1 Death To women's Rights. Death To women's Freedoms. Death To women's Liberties. Destroy feminism. Marry your daughters off at menarchy. Rape your wives. Death To women's Rights. Question: why do the europeans worship women? Are they faggots?

2 I wonder what M is getting the little woman for Valentines Day.

3 Roofies?

4 m has a woman? I think he more likely has a goat.

5 M has been banned.

6 Oooooookaaaaay then. I'm not sure what point M was trying to make, but I am sure he completely missed.

7 M who?

8 I'm sure it made complete sense to m - which is a scary thought in itself.

9 He sounded like a British 'father's rights' advocate, as odd as that may sound.

10 Hey, M. Mohammad is the false prophet and Allah is his Beast. See you in hell.

11 this is a really outrageous act on the danish behalf; it is a lame excuse to protect the freedom of expression by insulting the thoughts and beliefs of others. This will testify to the Danish inability to grasp the importance of being responsible to the so-called freedom ; becaues a vital part of freedom is realising one's own boundries.

12 Ha Ha Ha - you have a rather odd definition of freedom - speech, expression etc. But your presence in the West far from your islamic utopias essentially betrays your ideals and exposes you as a fraud.

13 "becaues a vital part of freedom is realising one's own boundries." Yep - now you just need to realize YOUR boundries. "by insulting the thoughts and beliefs of others." Typical. It's all about you and your religion, isn't it?

14 There is a town in central Java, called Kudus. Back in 15th century, it was still a Hindu majority. Then came a muslim wali name Sunan Kudus, who establish a school and preach about Islam to the town inhabitant. Gradually the number of muslim increase. One interesting thing was, in order to respect the Hindu beliefs, Sunan Kudus prohibited his disciples and followers from eating cow meat. Even though there is nothing in Islam that prohibit so. Up until today 600 years later, with Kudus as a muslim-majority town, many of the people still restraint from eating cow. Another story, there is a church called Gereja Jawi Wetan (East Java Church). Since its establishment in 19th century, it has prohibited its congregation from eating pork, to respect their muslim neighbour. What do you think ?

15 jarot, I think that people who come to Europe should respect the traditions of Europe, just like Sunan Kudas respected the tradition of the Hindus and Gereja Jawi Wetan respected the tradition of the Muslims.

16 jarot I think your full of bull - nice parable though for a sermon.

17 You mean someone is spreading some .exe or script among Danes and asking them to use it to attack Al Jazeera, et al??? Maybe this script is actually a nasty virus created by the Islamo-Fascist Cyber-Terrorists and it is gonna do something mailicious to the poor Danes who thought they were attacking someone else??? You don't know what kind of twisted minds they have in the Middle East.... P.S. If the Islamists want THEIR religion respected by others, they should respect OTHER religions, as well. Instead, they destroy other houses of worship (e.g. Jewish Temple Mount in Jeruslem, Hindu Temple at Ayodyah, and more with Christian churches and Buddhist temples....). As it is, the rest of the world has tolerated Islamic intolerance for so long that the Arabs/Muslims get upset when their own intolerance is not tolerated.... The M.E. is a very strange place...

18 jesusland joe, i think to respect someone's faith or values can be done be it in Europe or anywhere. when i spoke to my Dutch guest, I can talk openly and addressing him with his name directly without worry of offending him. i accept the openness as part of the values hold by my Dutch guest. in the other hand I won't use the same openness to my fellow countrymen, because many of them will find it offesinve. another case, asking "where are you going", or "where have you been" to a complete stranger are considered to be a part of polite conversation by my fellow countrymen. while the same questions to my Dutch guess, get a reply "that's none of your business".

19 It is coordinated dos attacks and dos tools that are affecting the Danish sites. More information can be found here regarding the boycott and the cyber attacks: http://www.wincoast.com/forum/showthread.php?p=527904#post527904

20 The Danish cartoons are nasty and repulsive. Muslims are right to condemn them and boycott filthy Danish products.

21 Strange that we don't see bands of marauding buddhists threatening to kill anyone who eats meat ?? Or bands of guerilla pig farmers parachuting into Syria forcing the faithful to eat pork ?!

22 Where was all the protests when the crazy muslims were blowing up all the staues of budda ?

23 Feck them rag wearing fagots, I say its all a load of tosh, don't believe any of that shite. fredom to garfield, Fcuk the prophet Mohammed with some pork sausages.

24 My best friend said I had to visit your site. She was right,thanks!

25 These cartoons have raised, according to me, the question of the freedom of speech's boundaries. Are we stepping on other's freedom by publishing these cartoons? (and don't tell me it's just a cartoon, critics may have more impact than acts) Example: If you share a flat with a jewish friend for instance and you hang posters in your room of Hitler or Mussolini(cuz your a fan, it's your right to be fan of whoever you want). There's no law or legal act that prohibits you from having these posters in your room because it's the freedom of thoughts and beliefs. But you will not gain the sympathy and the friendship of your flat mate obviously. Therefore, if we want to live together in peace with our muslim neighbors, we have to be careful not to offense them. Of course, in a hypothetic utopia of freedom of speech these cartoons should be allowed. But learning to live together is more than just saying "i can say whatever i want cuz it's freedom of speech", it's also to be careful to what you say and what we do according to OTHER'S beliefs and thoughts. I would prefer the phrase "HOW TO LIVE TOGETHER" rather than "FREEDOM OF SPEECH". "Freedom of speech", as much as "democracy", have been overused by media and have been uprooted from their social-economical-historical initial context, to end up as an political oriented instrument.

26 Why don't people start waking up to the real world instead of believing in instituions some created over 1500 years ago. Religion in any form was in those times a system of law which worked well when there was no form of organised policing, as time went on eventually religion become nothing more than a reason to go to war and break those very rules that they were created to police. People who still believe in religion, the after life etc should face up to the truth, they are believing in no more than a story, and as everyone knows stories change with time until they fade away completely. The various religious texts have all been manipulated with time to suit those in power at the time. During the times that they were written very few could even read or write therefore relying on the preaching and word's of others, they may as well be hear-say rather than evidence of actual history. On a side note- If the goal as preached by many of the religious fanatics is for a united Muslim nation, Palestine nation, or any other such claim why are all these groups still in fighting amongst them selves. If you cant even unify as groups do you really think you can unify the world all under one religion. At least the west doesnt preach happiness, freedom and love all for changing faith, the west has already experienced the difficulties of unification and has still never managed to get it right. Along the way one critical lesson has been learnt that violence, war and terrorism will not acheive anything even if you declare it in a holy way as was done with the Crusades and now with Jihad.