January 30, 2006

Another Jill Carrol Hostage Video Emerges

jill.carroll.aljazeera.second.hostage.video.jpgUPDATE 2/09/06: Third Jill Carroll hostage video here.

Scroll through for updates or check the MAIN PAGE here or our pages dedicated exclusively to Jill Carroll for the latest news on Jill Carroll and other hostages in Iraq.
----------
Disturbing news that al Jazeera has released yet another Jill Carroll video. This time, the massogonistic terrorists force Ms. Carroll to cover her head. Sickening.

UPDATE: While we continue to search for the unedited video, you can see the al Jazeera broadcast here (see right side of screen). As further evidence of al Jazeera's objectively pro-terrorist stance, anti-Americanism, and lies, earlier reports by the station itself that no audio were shown are not true. Al Jazeera does let this bit of audio slip by in the background:

their own government [inaudible] Iraq...let these people go home to their families
Undoubtedly a reference to the female Iraqi prisoners.

Roy Hallums, a hostage liberated by U.S. troops, related that when his terrorist captors wanted him to cry on his video, they first beat him. They said they wanted his tears to look 'believable'.

We pray for Jill Carroll's immediate release and for divine retribution to visit her captors. Hopefully in the form of the unpleasent end of an M16.

Al Jazeera:

Jill Carroll, the kidnapped US journalist, has appeared in a new video on Aljazeera, weeping and appealing for the release of women Iraqi prisoners.

The video, aired by Aljazeera on Monday, shows Carroll wearing a veil and weeping.

Jill-carroll-weeping.jpg
The video had no sound, but Aljazeera said she appealed for the release of women Iraqi prisoners. [Ed note: this is a deliberate falsehood on al Jazeera's part. Al Jazeera edited out most of Jill Carroll's pleas, but not a bit asking for the release of female prisoners]

Carroll is visibly crying in the video and wears a veil as she speaks to the camera. The footage has a time signature with the date 28 January.

Aljazeera's newscaster said in the video Carroll appeals to the US military and the Iraqi Interior Ministry to release all women in their prisons and that this "would help in winning her release".

More information and background about the Jill Carroll hostage situation can be found here.

UPDATE: Come to think of it, this is VERY good news. Jill Carroll's captors had given the U.S. a 72 hour deadline to release female prisoners in Iraq. That deadline expired 8 days before this film was time stamped. While it is still possible that her life is being threatened, the fact that they've let at least two deadlines pass without (apparently) harming her is a sign that perhaps their threats are idle.

Posted by: Rusty at 03:37 PM | Comments (74) | Add Comment
Post contains 418 words, total size 4 kb.

1 I'm not to sure what to make of the veil, she has in the past worn them willingly: http://www.here-now.org/content/2006/01/10/0110reporter100.jpg You know the 'radical' Islam types though, they were probably worried her hairstyle would give them a woody. Let's hope for her safe return.

Posted by: dave at January 30, 2006 03:43 PM (CcXvt)

2 Amen Rusty, the poor woman. Those bastards have not one ounce of humanity.

Posted by: Howie at January 30, 2006 03:44 PM (D3+20)

3 So why does al-jazeera leave out the sound? Seems like an effort to soften the video to me. Can any one else think of a reason her sobs were left out other than to show the terrorists slime in the best possible light.

Posted by: Howie at January 30, 2006 03:48 PM (D3+20)

4 I wonder what the ACLU has to say about this?

Posted by: Brad at January 30, 2006 03:49 PM (3OPZt)

5 They stopped running the sound shortly after the Polish hostage crisis. Remember that? The Arab world was outraged that al Jazeera ran that woman's sobs on the air. It made Muslims look like savages. Imagine that.

Posted by: Rusty at January 30, 2006 03:53 PM (JQjhA)

6 Savages indeed.

Posted by: Howie at January 30, 2006 04:03 PM (D3+20)

7 Seems like you should learn your lesson, but then again idiots never learn from their lesson. Free the Muslims all around the world.

Posted by: Abdul Wali at January 30, 2006 04:18 PM (lDj8F)

8 "Let me put it this way, you wimp: I DARE YOU to kill her!" -- Danny DeVito, "Ruthless People" http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091877/

Posted by: mojo at January 30, 2006 04:20 PM (U9foz)

9 The scary thing about Abdul Wali, is that he is in Lutton, U.K. You'd expect this kind of reaction from Saudi Arabia, but not a Briton. Traitor.

Posted by: Rusty at January 30, 2006 04:23 PM (JQjhA)

10 It's sad that someone almost "on their side" is being used in this exploitative way. Let's hope they turn her loose and that she smartens up.

Posted by: youngbourbonprofessional at January 30, 2006 04:29 PM (tdhAh)

11 Yes, free those Muslims who think for themselves and enslave them in the idology of jihad and salafacism. They should only think and feel what the prophet who married a nine-year old girl says for them to think. That will surely improve their lot in life.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 04:29 PM (rUyw4)

12 Abdul Wali, the NSA read your Hotmail.

Posted by: dave at January 30, 2006 04:36 PM (CcXvt)

13 We should all email him to be sure he qualifies.

Posted by: Howie at January 30, 2006 04:37 PM (D3+20)

14 Even with the sound off, the impact of those images is not diminished. I pray that she makes it out unharmed. I also pray that her captors, the people who Abdul Wali holds in such high esteem are quickly taken into custody, using mops, buckets and a pressure washer or two. Unfortunately there is no shortage of Abdul-esque types polluting the UK and elsewhere with their presence.

Posted by: Graeme at January 30, 2006 04:48 PM (+JGk2)

15 Ah but the Sith Master Paduan Jawa is on the case. You are banned so go away. M came back

Posted by: Howie at January 30, 2006 04:49 PM (D3+20)

16 Hey, Abdul Wali. Mohammad is the false prophet and Allah is his Beast. See you in hell.

Posted by: MandM at January 30, 2006 04:50 PM (/lpvu)

17 He will keep this up till his hands are too sticky - just ignore - he will past.

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 04:59 PM (3aakz)

18 This most recent kidnapping is further proof that Islam is a fundamentally de-humanising religion. The West should take the opportunity to act decisively against Iran's nuclear program and drop nuclear bombs on Iran. Abdul Wali: would that not free millions of muslims to become Shaheed and have 72 virgins? Your culture and religion sucks, and your odour could be much improved (by lethal radiation).

Posted by: seeker at January 30, 2006 05:06 PM (BNseL)

19 Weren't the Iraqi women prisoners released last weekend as scheduled? Or at least a number of them?

Posted by: MOG at January 30, 2006 05:16 PM (ClGDj)

20 MOG, Five of a total of eight were released. Which seems strange that in a country of 25 million only 3 women would have ties to the insurgency.

Posted by: Rusty at January 30, 2006 05:17 PM (JQjhA)

21 Deliberately editing out the sound! If that isn't the most blatant and amaturish form of tampering I've seen in a long time - then I don't know what is. So, is it going to be available to the MSM unedited? Does the MSM have any comment on this piece of work on the part of their esteemed fellow journalists?

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 05:25 PM (3aakz)

22 Are those hands sticky yet?

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 05:30 PM (3aakz)

23 MikeeUSA: Do you have anger issues?

Posted by: youngbourbonprofessional at January 30, 2006 05:36 PM (tdhAh)

24 Jesusland Joe, E-mail me when you get a chance. Rusty.

Posted by: Rusty at January 30, 2006 05:48 PM (JQjhA)

25 Look at her. She's all dhimmified. But hey, it doesn't compare to "Pat Robertson".

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 30, 2006 06:11 PM (8e/V4)

26 Start handing out death sentences to all of the terrorists in custody. Start up their trials and upon finding them guilty of terrorism, SENTENCE THEM TO DEATH AND PUBLICLY EXECUTE THEM! KILL THEM ALL DAMN IT!

Posted by: Andre at January 30, 2006 06:16 PM (bQ3vG)

27 It shouldn't be long now before muslims start disappearing in civilized countries. Of course then, they'll scream about their rights and such. We're just going to have to exterminate them like the vermin they are.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 30, 2006 06:24 PM (0yYS2)

28 MikeeUSA, what a complete moron you are.

Posted by: Oyster at January 30, 2006 06:30 PM (YudAC)

29 Mikee, so you're using a fake IP. WOW! you must be so impressed with yourself. moron.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 30, 2006 06:36 PM (8e/V4)

30 Mikee you are just another in a long line of fools; I see you are the moron for January. This hostage taking has to stop. I wonder why we can't plant trained people with tracking devices under their skin to be kidnapped, then send in the troops. It might take a while but after wiping out a few insurgent cells the muslims would probably turn chicken and lessen their attempts at abducting westerners.

Posted by: Jester at January 30, 2006 06:48 PM (QKZX5)

31 jill carroll is in real danger. her pain socks me right in the heart. hellums may have been beaten to induce tears, i fear carroll has been raped. a word about the missing audio though. is it possible that this is the one thing that al jazeera will cooperate with the authorities on? my understanding is that this is standard procedure for hostage situations to reduce false leads and controll for misinfo. al jazeera may be doing this not nessesarily at the u.s.'s request, but at the request of the quatar government, who have divided loyalties. another point, i don't believe their threats are idle. they may mke her execution part of the jihadist response to the sotu or are otherwise hoping to affix added signifigance to it. the taking of a woman and using her captivity to demand the release of women prisoners seems to me to be an act of premeditated symbolism. the "peace" activists in iraq, i'm certain, are advising them well also, improbulus maximus does not speak for me any more than a robert scheer or a cindy sheehan, and i reject his creepy, eliminationist reaction in the strongest terms.

Posted by: jummy at January 30, 2006 06:54 PM (kGfOr)

32 It's very sad. My understanding is that the woman is a liberal and was in Iraq reporting from basically an anti-American perspective. What we're seeing, sadly, is the reality of a liberal getting her wake-up call to the reality of the world. The world is not a place of sweetness and light where all cultures are equal and everything is relative and "context" is all-important. These Muslims couldn't care less about context and relativity and equality. They just want to saw off the heads of people who don't submit to them. And this poor liberal woman is finding this out the hard way. God Bless and keep her, I hope she is delivered to safety.

Posted by: MarkJ at January 30, 2006 07:23 PM (HECm6)

33 MikeeUSA going bye bye please stand by......

Posted by: Howie at January 30, 2006 07:38 PM (D3+20)

34 Stinky hands are the devil's mono-playground.

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 07:41 PM (3aakz)

35 Do some research about an Eyptian hostage who escaped after his hostage video was filmed. He claimed that a stringer who worked with Al Jazeera helped direct the hostage video prior to its filming. It might just be one of the many rumors floating around Iraq, but on two other occasions Al Jazeera was accused of paying protesters to riot against Americans, and another time they interviewed militants trucked in to an IED bombing to rail against Americans while the Iraq who lived in the house two doors down claimed he had never seen them before. The sad fact is, without the public distribution outlet Al Jazeera provides terrorists, many of these kidnappings would either not take place, or would be settled financially in a matter of days.

Posted by: Anon at January 30, 2006 07:57 PM (UxviT)

36 Rusty, I sent you an e-mail at 6:00pm. Have not heard from you yet. It's under heat Aaron.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 10:16 PM (rUyw4)

37 I truly hope Jill is safe and everything is OK. But, I hate myself when I say it, but, I just get the strongest feeling someone is trying to sell me a newspaper...

Posted by: Bob at January 30, 2006 10:36 PM (EKMxC)

38 Why don't we just start knocking off those precious Iraqi women terrorists in our custody, unless they let her free? We should start our videos by having the Iraqi detainees eating bacon or something. Filthy savages, with their backward culture, such as it is.

Posted by: benno at January 30, 2006 10:40 PM (tXsgc)

39 I'm not sure I'm ready to agree with offing unarmed women...but, I like the eating bacon video idea! How about Clinton, a cigar, a veiled muslim chick eating bacon?

Posted by: Bob at January 30, 2006 11:13 PM (EKMxC)

40 With the caption "I never porked that woman"

Posted by: Bob at January 30, 2006 11:16 PM (EKMxC)

41 I think the story would be much fuller if it were explained why women are being held by the US. This might be able to either justify the captivity of the Iraqi women by the US or show that their captivity is unjustified. This would in no way justify the terrorists' tactics, but would explain their position. I pray for the release of Jill and the release of all unjustly imprisoned people.

Posted by: Jason at January 30, 2006 11:29 PM (eLgNA)

42 It's sad that someone almost "on their side" is being used in this exploitative way. Let's hope they turn her loose and that she smartens up. Posted by: youngbourbonprofessional at January 30, 2006 04:29 PM She wasn't on the terrorists' side. She was on the side of honest law abiding Iraqis that want freedom. GD it! This most recent kidnapping is further proof that Islam is a fundamentally de-humanising religion. The West should take the opportunity to act decisively against Iran's nuclear program and drop nuclear bombs on Iran. Abdul Wali: would that not free millions of muslims to become Shaheed and have 72 virgins? Your culture and religion sucks, and your odour could be much improved (by lethal radiation). Posted by: seeker at January 30, 2006 05:06 PM seeker, you sound like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. http://www.president.ir/eng/

Posted by: Jason at January 30, 2006 11:42 PM (eLgNA)

43 Jason Of course the US & the Iraqi govt are unjustly imprisoning Iraqi women! For what reason? - none of course - but don't put it past those evil Americans to be using them for comfort girlees! This will of course 'explain" the actions of the "alleged" terrorists to you for your satisfaction. Clearly America has commited a crime against islam and must pay - so - sorry Jill Carrol - you are available. Jason can now feel better - and fake his concern and blame your death on America. BTW Jason - There is now a new job opening for a journalist in Iraq - you might like it - you write well enough - get out - meet the people - maybe come to understand them - get the truth out about the evil American Occupation. I'm sure they will welcome you with open arms.

Posted by: hondo at January 31, 2006 12:10 AM (3aakz)

44 ... and a videocamera.

Posted by: hondo at January 31, 2006 12:12 AM (3aakz)

45 "I think the story would be much fuller if it were explained why women are being held by the US. This might be able to either justify the captivity of the Iraqi women by the US or show that their captivity is unjustified." You don't really believe the kidnappers care one whit why these women are being detained - do you?

Posted by: Oyster at January 31, 2006 05:41 AM (YudAC)

46 The only difference between martyrdom and suicide bombers (or as i like to refer to them 'murderers for mohammed') is the press coverage.

Posted by: ibiubu at January 31, 2006 06:24 AM (qqbUc)

47 RE: Jill Carroll There's an old saying that a conservative is a liberal who's been mugged. If she makes it out alive, I wonder what she'll think of the poor widdle terrorists, er, freedom fighters. God grant that she is returned home safely.

Posted by: docjim505 at January 31, 2006 09:30 AM (MC8cP)

48 Has anyone researched her writing to determine who's side she's actually on?

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 31, 2006 10:09 AM (0yYS2)

49 I'll bet my testicles that she'll be released and go on to praise her kidnappers as perfect gentlemen. She might even pull a Yvonna and convert. She was wayyyy to sympathetic to them to assume she's actually being held against her will.

Posted by: Mus Zibii at January 31, 2006 12:18 PM (JG5R3)

50 Although I don't agree with the Muslim religion, i don't liken to hear Christians and/or Americans saying "The Muslims this.." and "The Muslims that.." We don't have to agree to get along and show love to one another, and I am sure there are plenty of Muslims who agree. If not, well ok then, but I am going to do what Jesus commanded, which is love one another. He didn't say, "unless they are Muslim." Pray for these men to have mercy on Jill. If they don't, pray for her soul to be united with the Lord in Heaven. Hey if you disagree-that is fine with me...

Posted by: RobbieKeane68 at January 31, 2006 01:17 PM (5838u)

51 Hey RobbieKeane68: why don't you go preach those views of yours in Saudi Arabia?

Posted by: dave at January 31, 2006 01:24 PM (CcXvt)

52 Ok, Dave...I'm not much of a preacher, but why is it that having a view is "preaching"? Just like I can have a viewpoint so can anyone else-- I am just saying that hope and peace lies in loving each other. If "over there" I would be beheaded for saying such a crazy thing, then at least I am at peace with how God would feel about it--I still have my hope and peace regardless of what anyone else says or does. Arguing about it, whether with words or with war, is not effective. If love is not effective here on earth, then, OK!

Posted by: RobbieKeane68 at January 31, 2006 01:40 PM (5838u)

53 robbie Nice try at sentimentality - doesn't work given your phony link - safe to assume your phony too - and looking to be coyly provacative with a holier than thou approach.

Posted by: hondo at January 31, 2006 01:47 PM (3aakz)

54 I'M holier than THOU? interesting, but all yours nonetheless. I wouldn't feel so safe in assuming anything. no one is holier than anyone except God, not even you--that is my point about these folks on here going on about "the muslims" when it is not their place to judge or make assumptions..excuse me for having such an outrageous opinion, hondo! what do you mean my link is fake-i didn't even add my link so how can it be fake?

Posted by: RobbieKeane68 at January 31, 2006 01:58 PM (5838u)

55 If you want to drop me a line why don't you write me at {deleted} ...that should be where my "link" takes you..

Posted by: RobbieKeane68 at January 31, 2006 02:13 PM (5838u)

56 Robbie- Dont' give out your addy. And don't worry about them saying you have a fake link. I don't understand much about ISP's and such, but there is a cerain kind that appears to be fake because it changes. Roams, so to speak. Don't get caught up in defending yourself. Make your statement, and let the chips fall.

Posted by: Righty-Tighty at January 31, 2006 02:32 PM (7a66P)

57 ok, R-T-thanks-yeah, i didn't realize about the link thing either-never has come up before. I don't mind anyone writing me- it's not like I give out any of my real info on the net anyway for safety reasons...oh, or that i am so fake! ha.it's cool.

Posted by: RobbieKeane68 at January 31, 2006 02:36 PM (5838u)

58 But you so obviously are.

Posted by: hondo at January 31, 2006 06:10 PM (3aakz)

59 I was very saddened to see Jill crying and suffering in her video. It is good to see that she is still alive. I hope and pray for her safe release to her family. I know the devastation they are feeling with the uncertainty of their sweet Jill. Free Jill and all the hostages in Iraq, Susan new website from Carrie Hallums Cooper hostagefamilymatters.com

Posted by: Susan Hallums at January 31, 2006 07:17 PM (OjS5b)

60 fuck it. fry them faggots. fuck em all

Posted by: poppa at January 31, 2006 08:24 PM (CEvk8)

61 Her writings, her website, indicate she went there to 'crusade' for the 'Iraqi people'... Her sister ran a web site calling her “Lady of Arabia” which suggests Lawrence of Arabia who was well known for his romantic illusions. I ask you... does this quote also reflect a bit of a 'martyr' complex? “There are more lucrative ways to work and faster ways to advance a career,” she wrote in March 2005 for the American Journalism Review. “But just as athletes do it for love of the game, freelancers in Iraq seem to do it for love of the story.” She wrote freelance for the Christian Science Monitor articles that were biased towards the 'worsening' situation: “The anger and violence have only gotten worse since” April 2004, she wrote in AJR, and she specifically mentioned kidnapping as a threat. Like all the collaborators she actively participates and in so doing further reinforces her bona fides guaranteeing her eventual release. But just like previous staged 'events' she did seem to make it pretty easy: Carroll had reportedly been there to interview Adnan al-Dulaimi, the leader of the Iraqi Accordance Front, a Sunni political party. He wasn’t there and she left after waiting between 20 and 30 minutes. According to the driver and witnesses, the gunmen forced the driver to stop, then pulled him out of the car, piled in and drove away with Carroll and her translator, Allan Enwiyah, 32. “All together, it didn't take 10 seconds,” Carroll's driver told the Washington Post Monday night. Later Saturday, Enwiyah was found dead on the side of a road in Adel, the neighborhood where they were taken. Anybody want to talk about Sunni leaks? This 'abduction' was hushed up because the newsies themselves decided they might be able to 'negotiate'. Or was that collaborate? She will pass the 'Islamic Witch Test' as only the innocent are burned. The guilty are released to burn us...

Posted by: DANEgerus at February 01, 2006 11:33 PM (EcDu5)

62 Wow, interesting comments. It must be nice to have a place where your bigoted and ignorant opinions are encouraged. I don't see any difference between those who want to "nuke Iran" or "kill Iraqi female detainees" and the terrorists holding Jill. You are all the same. Why don't you all go to an island so you can battle it out and leave the rest of us alone!

Posted by: kc at February 06, 2006 02:10 PM (6dAeG)

63 Wow, interesting comments. It must be nice to have a place where your bigoted and ignorant opinions are encouraged. I don't see any difference between those who want to "nuke Iran" or "kill Iraqi female detainees" and the terrorists holding Jill. You are all the same. Why don't you all go to an island so you can battle it out and leave the rest of us alone!

Posted by: c at February 06, 2006 02:11 PM (6dAeG)

64 The problems in the mideast started way before the U.S. From the crusades, to the Abassids, to the Ottoman Turks, WW1 and the breaking of the region into spheres of influence, the U.S. action is of little consequence. The issues run way further than Al Qaida and Iraq...it's a distrust of occupation and colonialism, and this is identified with the West. Few countries in the region accept the existence of Israel, and they hate America for supporting it. (Thanks to Britain and France in their colonial actions). Our military will not transform the region, and Jill Carroll is imply a pawn being used by cowards who believe they are men by kidnapping a woman. We should take care of the terrorists, and then leave for good. Jill Carroll is an American, we should all hope for her release, with the left and right crap aside.

Posted by: Chris at February 07, 2006 03:43 PM (ZVpQt)

65 The prophet has declared this slaves vagina to be used for allah. she is a sex whore. stop saying that liberals dont need to be slaves to allah.

Posted by: waheed at February 08, 2006 03:35 AM (KxPKJ)

66 THIS WHOLE THING IS A SCAM.. SHE IS JUST TRYNG TO GET A MOVIE AND A BOOK DEAL... IF SHE WAS REALLY CAPTURED THEY WOULD OF KILLED HER ALREADY... EITHER KILL HER OR STOP TALKING ABOUT IT... SHE DOESNT SEEM TO WORRIED ABOUT THE WHOLE THING... KILL ALL ARABS

Posted by: AMERICA at February 09, 2006 10:02 AM (t8I9m)

67 SHE COULD EASILY HAVE ARABS OVER THERE SET THIS WHOLE TV THING UP AND TAPE IT WITH NO INTENTIONS ON KILLING HER JUST TO MAKE HER FAMOUS AND GAIN MILLIONS FROM HER STORY WHEN THEY FINALLY RELEASE HER.... HER HEAD WAS SUPPOSE TO BE CUT OFF A MONTH AGO.. WHY IS HER HEAD STILL ATTACHED TO HER SHOULDERS???? WHY???

Posted by: AMERICA at February 09, 2006 10:05 AM (t8I9m)

68 Maybe my eyes are worse than I thought - but in looking at the side by side photos on today's CNN homepage, the two women do not look the same. Look closely at the nose on each of them. Also, the one on the right looks younger. Does anyone else notice that?

Posted by: Marilyn at February 09, 2006 10:53 PM (Y93ys)

69 KILL HER ALREADY... BET THEY WONT CAUSE ITS A SCAM... HOW MANY DEADLINES DO YOU GIVE THE UNITED STATES... SUCH BULLSHIT.. CHOP HER HEAD OFF NOW!!!!! AMERICA IS FULL OF IDIOTS

Posted by: AMERICA at February 10, 2006 03:06 PM (t8I9m)

70 I think that all you muslims are shit. how can you take a woman for a hostage? i cant wait intill we kill you all. rest in peace jill, for having hope.

Posted by: tha usa at February 11, 2006 06:03 PM (QtVWV)

71 Moslems kill each other over a cartoon but when a human being is beheaded not a word is said against it!! Why is the ONE who says you get 42 Virgins when you die for Allah ; Hiding out!! Osama Bin Laden to be specific!! That would show somekind of humanity if they released Jill Carroll!!

Posted by: Garryowen at February 16, 2006 12:07 AM (406FR)

72 That's plain insane. If you think that killing all muslims is the cure---you're an idiot. Jill Carroll is taking the punishment for people like you. Oh, and to the captors....grow some balls. Kidnapping a cute little american girl really isn't that intimidating dumbasses. Let her go.

Posted by: Mikey Fresh at February 16, 2006 11:21 AM (fFre4)

73 WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE THAT WOULD KIDNAP SOMEONE,ESPECIALLY A WOMAN,AND THREATEN TO KILL HER????? SHE WAS THERE TO TELL A FAIR STORY.THERE IS NO WAY SHE CAN DO IT WHEN SHE'S DEAD!!!! TO HER CAPTERS: YOU PEOPLE HAVE AN AGENDA,FINE.BUT, YOU WILL COME ACROSS AS COWARDS,NOT HEROS,IF YOU HARM HER.YOU DON'T HAVE THE BALLS TO "F" WITH OUR MARINES,DO YOU? THEY WOULD PUT A BOOT SO FAR UP YOUR ASS YOU'D BE CHEWING LEATHER!!!!LET HER GO !!!DON'T MAKE THE WHOLE U.S. COME AND "F" YOU UP!!!! JAMES WARREN PROUD AMERICAN....

Posted by: JAMES WARREN at February 26, 2006 10:42 PM (4nZcu)

74 LET HER GO,YOU COWARDS!!!!!!

Posted by: JAMES WARREN at February 26, 2006 10:45 PM (4nZcu)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
53kb generated in CPU 0.0197, elapsed 0.1387 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.1278 seconds, 323 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.