December 27, 2005

An Intra-Generational Clash

This article, from the Chicago Sun Times explains why so many of these folks seem like such brats:

Harris, 19, is in her second year at Loyola University. But she has no desire to distance herself from her parents now that she no longer lives at home. Nor does she plan to rely less as a college student on her parents for help or advice.

"Something happens, your first thought is call Mom,'' she says. "Mom will fix it.''

The record number of students now at colleges and universities are bringing with them something not seen as much on campus in generations past: their parents. The current generation of students, experts say, increasingly chooses to maintain strong bonds with their parents. With cell phones and e-mail, they're able to stay in touch to a degree not seen among previous generations. The strings are so tight some experts have come up with a name for these college students -- the "coddled generation.''

I'm sure there are some good things about remaining close to your parents, but the contrast with the folks in this LA Times article by Robert Kaplan (who are from the same generation, ironically) could not be starker:

Regardless of whether you support or oppose the U.S. engagement in Iraq, you should be aware that that country has had a startling effect on a new generation of soldiers often from troubled backgrounds, whose infantry training has provided no framework for building democracy from scratch.

At a Thanksgiving evangelical service, one NCO told the young crowd to cheers: "The Pilgrims during the first winter in the New World suffered a 54% casualty rate from disease and cold. That's a casualty rate that would render any of our units combat ineffective. But did the Pilgrims sail back to England? Did they give up? No. This country isn't a quitter. It doesn't withdraw."

I see trouble brewin' when Group I clashes with Group II. More at The Belmont Club.

Posted by: Demosophist at 04:30 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 333 words, total size 2 kb.

1 The Pilgrim casualty rate is a bad comparison, I think, because they didn't exactly bring round-trip tickets. The options were survive or die in the colonies. I should leave it to the ground-pounders to say what kind of casualties they could tolerate today, but historically it's been civilian, more than military, morale that gets tossed by U.S. casualties. So far as I can make out the last time our ground forces suffered a large-scale rout was in the Korean War. Since then our deployments have been restricted not by any lack of courage in our soldiers, but by TV-watching civilians who lack any educated idea of the sort of casualties to be expected.

Posted by: ShannonKW at December 27, 2005 06:22 PM (dT1MB)

2 Agent Smith searched the archives and found a tidbit: The so-called "Pilgrims" were dangerous Eurasian religious fanatics who secretly hatched up their mono-maniacal theocratic schemes in Northern European port cities. Once they excecuted their social upheaval campaign, they were discovered and ruthlessly hounded by the security services. On the run from the European authorities, they lashed out to invade the Americas in their fast-flying vessels. It gets worse: once their unrestrained plague of god-violence hit the American shores, the religious zealots laid the groundwork for a multigenerational war of conquest and never-ending conflict against the unbelievers. Agent Jones says they exchanged baloney for turkey. Agent Brown says we must do whatever we can to find those so-called "Pilgrims" and smoke 'em out of their New England holes!

Posted by: Agent Smith at December 27, 2005 07:33 PM (Gy73I)

3 I guess the point I was making wasn't so much about the pilgrim allegory, but about the stark difference in character between the "coddled generation" and the campaign-crucible-tested citizen soldiers. Or rather, it's about what happens when the insufferable brats meet the warriors in a contest for power. My money is on the warriors.

Posted by: Demosophist at December 28, 2005 04:42 AM (lH8jm)

4 And in these colleges, how many of these "coddled children" will be taught by their professors to hate everything their parents stand for while they gleefully take the parents' money?

Posted by: Oyster at December 28, 2005 06:11 AM (YudAC)

5 She calls her parents becuase they know better then all those mindless collage administartors

Posted by: sandpiper at December 28, 2005 09:53 AM (6rkkO)

6 I call these trustfund babies the "rage against your allowance" generation.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at December 28, 2005 11:29 AM (0yYS2)

7 Agent Smith calls Improbulus the "rage against himself" anomaly.

Posted by: Agent Smith at December 31, 2005 02:12 AM (HuVhz)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
21kb generated in CPU 0.0236, elapsed 0.1178 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.108 seconds, 256 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.