January 23, 2006

Amnesty International Workers Detained in (of all places) Sudan

This can't be the same Sudan that is on the United Nation's High Commission on Human Rights? That's some other Sudan, right? Because the savior of the world, the U.N., would never allow one of the worst violators of human rights in the world to help police human rights violations. That's simply not possible.Amnesty International:

At 5:55 pm local time yesterday, security forces in plain clothes entered the building where the NGO Forum was being held. The security forces -- their number varying from six to 15 during the occurrence -- ordered all delegates to switch off their mobile phones. They said that the meeting was "unauthorized" and demanded the names of all participants. Participants, numbering approximately forty, were ordered to hand over all documents and laptops. Some resisted; the security forces forced upon their bags. Some small scuffles broke out. At this point more security forces entered and surrounded the room. Still and digital photographs, along with recorded video, were taken of all the participants. Some participants were pushed, threatened, and told "you better do what we say or you will face problems later". There were repeated demands to participants to hand over their belongings.

Security forces attempted to divide the participants into international and national groups. Attempts were also made to separate women from men. Many refused both requests.

Charming. Before we begin oppressing you, you will be happy to know that you will be gender segregated.

Posted by: Rusty at 11:02 AM | Comments (15) | Add Comment
Post contains 255 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Damn George Bush, damn Karl Rove, and damn Halliburton too! Seriously, I can't wait to see how the leftards pin this on everyone from Ronald Regan to Pat Robertson.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 23, 2006 11:08 AM (0yYS2)

2 Don't forget, treatment at Guantanamo is far, far worse.

Posted by: Graeme at January 23, 2006 11:18 AM (j0Fnw)

3 True, Graeme.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 23, 2006 12:07 PM (0yYS2)

4 I have no idea why any sane person would go willingly to the Sudan.

Posted by: tee bee at January 23, 2006 12:17 PM (q1JHF)

5 Sudan is a "valuable member in the War on Terror". The oft sited offer of handing over Osama bin Laden was an early example of their cooperation. Certainly on that basis alone some alleged mistreatment of Amnesty International and the long standing ummm unpleasantness in Darfur should be overlooked.

Posted by: john Ryan at January 23, 2006 12:38 PM (TcoRJ)

6 And you're surprised that Sudan is chairing the Human Rights Commission? What's funny (okay - not funny) is that when the war started in Iraq, Lybia was slated to take the human rights chair and Iraq was to chair the disarmament committee.

Posted by: Oyster at January 23, 2006 03:42 PM (osKlJ)

7 Ya know, at times like this I would trot out the old chestnut about foxes and henhouses, but it would just be trite.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 23, 2006 04:00 PM (0yYS2)

8 I've no desire or interest in getting involved with anything Sudan - Im pulling an actus on this one. If the Lib/Left or any human rights group wants to involve themselves - then form up your own "Lincoln Brigades" like the '30s and march off to righteous glory. They can start recruiting at their local Universities - I might even donate 20 bucks and some old Army Training Manuals. Suspect big problem would be that any leftists interested, will all want to be Colonels and Generals and argue over the color of their berets. Biggest problem however is that none would be interested in getting their hands dirty - when there is a perfectly good rally nearby with a cute cafe available across the street for later gatherings of righteous indignation and lattes.

Posted by: hondo at January 23, 2006 04:06 PM (3aakz)

9 Yep, hondo, I can see it now, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King brigade. Volunteers are needed from the Left to go to the Sudan and clean the mess up. I can just imagine the number of volunteers. None.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 23, 2006 05:25 PM (rUyw4)

10 JJ Be honest! They will probably get a few naive fools probably believing THEIR PRESENSE as human shields between the Sudanese and the oppressed with ALTER THE COURSE OF HUMAN HISTORY. Once the Sudanese stop laughing, it may dawn on them that their target practice.

Posted by: hondo at January 23, 2006 05:41 PM (3aakz)

11 Inquiry to Lead at Headliner Search just moments ago re: Sudan, "Jeopardy@Iraq"

Posted by: Cheryl@StateInterests at January 23, 2006 05:50 PM (zta0g)

12 Inquiry to Lead at Headliner Search just moments ago re: Sudan, "Jeopardy@Iraq"

Posted by: Cheryl@StateInterests at January 23, 2006 05:51 PM (zta0g)

13 Inquiry to Lead at Headliner Search just moments ago re: Sudan, "Jeopardy@Iraq"

Posted by: Cheryl@StateInterests at January 23, 2006 05:51 PM (zta0g)

14 Uh, Cheryl... What? What? and, What?

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 23, 2006 09:49 PM (0yYS2)

15 I just can't understand why Karl Rove would dare say that some people around here are still thinking in a pre-September 11th fashion. I just don't get it. Why can't I go to Sudan and everything be happy, fuzzy, and warm?

Posted by: Dr. Zubov at January 24, 2006 12:46 PM (zrSt3)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
23kb generated in CPU 0.0245, elapsed 0.4063 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.3936 seconds, 264 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.