September 23, 2004

Allawi sees hope in Iraq

Some thoughts from Iraqi Interim Prime Minister Ayad Allawi to the US Congress today. In it, he reminds us that just because the media did not broadcast the attrocities committed under the Hussein regime, they were real nonetheless. Fox News via Jane:

It's a tough struggle with setbacks, but we are succeeding.

I have seen some of the images that are being shown here on television. They are disturbing. They focus on the tragedies, such as the brutal and barbaric murder of two American hostages this week.

My thoughts and prayers go out to their families and to all those who lost loved ones.

More below.

Yet, as we mourn these losses, we must not forget either the progress we are making or what is at stake in Iraq.

We are fighting for freedom and democracy, ours and yours. Every day, we strengthen the institutions that will protect our new democracy, and every day, we grow in strength and determination to defeat the terrorists and their barbarism.

The second message is quite simple and one that I would like to deliver directly from my people to yours: Thank you, America.

We Iraqis know that Americans have made and continue to make enormous sacrifices to liberate Iraq, to assure Iraq's freedom. I have come here to thank you and to promise you that your sacrifices are not in vain.

The overwhelming majority of Iraqis are grateful. They are grateful to be rid of Saddam Hussein and the torture and brutality he forced upon us, grateful for the chance to build a better future for our families, our country and our region.

We Iraqis are grateful to you, America, for your leadership and your sacrifice for our liberation and our opportunity to start anew.

Third, I stand here today as the prime minister of a country emerging finally from dark ages of violence, aggression, corruption and greed. Like almost every Iraqi, I have many friends who were murdered, tortured or raped by the regime of Saddam Hussein.

Well over a million Iraqis were murdered or are missing. We estimate at least 300,000 in mass graves, which stands as monuments to the inhumanity of Saddam's regime. Thousands of my Kurdish brothers and sisters were gassed to death by Saddam's chemical weapons.

Millions more like me were driven into exile. Even in exile, as I myself can vouch, we were not safe from Saddam.

And as we lived under tyranny at home, so our neighbors lived in fear of Iraq's aggression and brutality. Reckless wars, use of weapons of mass destruction, the needless loss of hundreds of thousands of lives and the financing and exporting of terrorism, these were Saddam's legacy to the world.

My friends, today we are better off, you are better off and the world is better off without Saddam Hussein.

Posted by: Rusty at 01:17 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 479 words, total size 3 kb.

1 The attrocities of the Hussein regime were indeed real. Perhaps we should remember that most were committed during a long period of U.S. support for the dictator. Does remembering this make me a terrorist enthusiast like Chomsky?

Posted by: Professor Peter Von Nostrand at September 23, 2004 02:08 PM (62QDG)

2 Professor Peter Von Nostrand, You know the answer to that--YES!!!!!!!! ;-) Not directly, mind you, but by subscribing to the same heuristics as the terrorists do (ie, American foreign policy is evil) you do, indirectly, give them morol support for what they do. To condemn violence universally meaningless when you single out a particular side for condemnation and for linking cause and effect. If America is the "cause" of so much suffering in the world then the solution to the world's problems immediately become manifest: make war on America. It follows fromt he Chomskyian premise. Unless you hope to convert the world to passifism I suggest your position is not only untenable, but also dangerous. Not that your motivations are bad, only that the results of your theory are.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford, owner of this blog at September 23, 2004 02:40 PM (JQjhA)

3 Thanks for the link.

Posted by: Jane at September 23, 2004 03:32 PM (AaBEz)

4 Kerry's response to Allawi? "What do you know?"

Posted by: Brian B at September 23, 2004 04:49 PM (OnnW3)

5 Rusty, A) Chomsky doesn't condemn violence universally. He is not a passifist. As Frank Reynolds once said, "Will somebody here please get it right, Damnit!?" It really is important to know somebody's argument before you run around suggesting they promote terrorism. B) How rational is it to decide Chomsky's premise is wrong based in large part on how you think people will react to it?

Posted by: Professor Peter Von Nostrand at September 23, 2004 11:18 PM (NJzm6)

6 I thought Allawi's speech was excellent and exactly what the people of the United States needed to hear. When he was done, he got a standing ovation. He thanked us. It made me feel better about being in Iraq. ~Cindy

Posted by: firstbrokenangel at September 24, 2004 12:35 AM (D39Vm)

7 Hey all, you guys want to help a brotha out?? http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/047301.php

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford, owner of this blog at September 24, 2004 02:28 PM (JQjhA)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
22kb generated in CPU 0.0176, elapsed 0.1993 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.191 seconds, 256 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.