November 10, 2005

Academic Freedom

Rusty wrote about this case the other day, but there's a new writeup here. This is the one where a tenured prof e-mailed a grad student blogger's faculty advisers to tell them he was pro life and get him in trouble.

Posted by: seedubya at 09:17 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 45 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Some are trying to put the focus on the two bloggers' dispute. That's not the real matter at hand here. People have disputes all the time. I can't see where Deignan was outwardly rude and BitchPHD was simply a weasel for deleting Deignan's comments. But that's business as usual on the web. It's the guy who called Deignan's advisors that should be the focus of the issue. The best comment there was the response BJS gave to Andrew Purvis: " .. how does tenure play a necessary role .." Why, of course, nothing. That is why the female (untenured faculty) in the matter is fighting to remain anonymous. And the PhD student (untenured) was reprimanded by his superiors. Subtle note of sarcasm there.

Posted by: Oyster at November 11, 2005 08:25 AM (fl6E1)

2 I screwed up my blockquote, but I think it's easy enough to figure out that I was tryng to blockquote BJS as well.

Posted by: Oyster at November 11, 2005 08:26 AM (fl6E1)

3 Let me reiterate for those who might not have gotten the memo: Liberals are scum and should all be shot.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at November 11, 2005 12:25 PM (0yYS2)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
17kb generated in CPU 0.0166, elapsed 0.1356 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.129 seconds, 252 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.