March 16, 2006

A Familiar Face

The Pentagon has just released to the public documents captured in Operation Iraqi Freedom. They can be accessed here in Adobe Acrobat format.

This one's interesting; the synopsis describes it this way:

ISGZ-2004-019920
2002 Iraqi Intelligence Correspondence concerning the presence of al-Qaida Members in Iraq. Correspondence between IRS members on a suspicion, later confirmed, of the presence of an Al-Qaeda terrorist group. Moreover, it includes photos and names.
The document hasn't been translated into English; many of the documents released are available only in Arabic. This one consists of photocopies of handwritten notes and photos, presumably of the al Qaeda members that Iraqi intelligence had listed as being in Iraq in 2002. Here's a detail from page 6: zarq1.jpg

I think the guy on the right looks better in this shot:

zarq2.jpg

This is a photo of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.

Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.

Posted by: Bluto at 01:03 AM | Comments (13) | Add Comment
Post contains 153 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Nice biography on Zarqawi. It makes him out to be a saint.

Posted by: Oyster at March 16, 2006 04:04 AM (YudAC)

2 Holy freakin schneike!

Posted by: Rusty at March 16, 2006 08:17 AM (JQjhA)

3 Yup that's Zaqueery.

Posted by: Howie at March 16, 2006 08:29 AM (NUh+w)

4 Check the shirt collar. The Zark suffers from the Arab national allergy to soap and water.

Posted by: david72 at March 16, 2006 09:36 AM (0WQCz)

5 Will the main stream press be as eager to get this info to the public as they were about touting "no weapons" or 'Abu Graib photos'? I don't think so!

Posted by: Ron Ruckman at March 16, 2006 12:55 PM (icxd8)

6 Can someone please explain why information like this has taken so long to reach the public, and why it is in the interest of the Bush administration to withhold it? Why do we question the mainstream media on this, after all they haven't had the information. However the White House has. What's going on?

Posted by: Mike at March 16, 2006 04:42 PM (lsVU/)

7 You guys have very short little memories. The administration had a chance to take out Zarqawi when he was a sitting duck in northern Iraq at the beginning of the war but the idea was shot down by the NSC. His camps were there, we knew where they were, but some bright guy in the Pentagon decided not to get him. According to several sources, the Pentagon had pushed to "take out" Zarqawi's operation at least three times prior to the invasion of Iraq, but had been vetoed by the National Security Council. The council's decision was made because they thought it would make it harder to convince other countries to join the US in a coalition against Iraq. "People were more obsessed with developing the coalition to overthrow Saddam than to execute the presidentÂ’s policy of preemption against terrorists," said former National Security Council member Roger Cressey.

Posted by: Jerry at March 16, 2006 08:30 PM (R5ka6)

8 Mike - information like this has to be properly vetted and when information of this import has been passed to the media inthe past, they don't run with it.

Posted by: Tim at March 17, 2006 02:34 PM (O+1/6)

9 It's the same picture. Isn't that odd?

Posted by: Regret at March 17, 2006 03:07 PM (OhVLZ)

10 No, it's not really that odd at all. There are few photographs of Zarqawi in circulation. The mug shot of him is probably the one that best shows his facial features, so it probably gets passed around the most.

Posted by: Darkmage at March 17, 2006 09:01 PM (It1I5)

11 Quote: "Will the main stream press be as eager to get this info to the public as they were about touting "no weapons" or 'Abu Graib photos'? I don't think so!" Posted by: Ron Ruckman at March 16, 2006 12:55 PM Are you that eager ? You notice how the photo looks rather mug-shot-ish ? That is because it is. The report states Saddam had that photo issued to his forces so they could identify and arrest Zarqawi. Yeah talk it up guys. That the link between Saddam and Zarqawi was that he was taking the same action against him in 2002 that the US is in 2006. Yeah that REALLY helps. If you were smarter you might notice your foot is missing from an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound.

Posted by: Geoff at March 17, 2006 11:35 PM (aOeXm)

12 Geoff, Mug Shots are taken AFTER you are arrested. You might be correct, but other terrorists also were allowed into Iraq and even had offices there. Check out Michael Totten's web page where he talks about the Kurdish town where Zarqawi was before the war. So, we could have possibly taken him out in the beginning.

Posted by: Aaron at March 18, 2006 08:22 AM (IwRtX)

13 It's possible that these mug shots were taken when Zarqawi was in Jordanian custody before being released in a general amnesty after King Hussein died in 1999.

Posted by: lawhawk at March 20, 2006 02:45 PM (eppTH)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
22kb generated in CPU 0.0227, elapsed 0.1214 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.1079 seconds, 262 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.