1 As a member of the 9-11 Truth Movement, I've always been skeptical of the "no 757 hit the Pentagon" angle, thinking it a government strawman that could easily be nocked down with a video from the Pentagon, the Sheraton Hotel, the Virgina Dept. of Transportation, or from the CITGO station, across the street. This video didn't do that. I can't see a 757 in it. Lame, lame, lame!

2 Not as cool as the hype was it.

3 Errr, Knocked.

4 Action: Terrorists in Iraq put out grainy video of something not clearly visible being blown up. Reaction: Further evidence that Iraq is another Vietnam Action: US government puts out video of explosion at the Pentagon on 9 / 11 Reaction: Prooves nothing - still no evidence that a terrorist attack actually occured.

5 As a member of the 9-11 Truth Movement Classic.

6 No video needed for proof, we all know it was a 757. Look at the similarity of the explosion to that of the twin towers. Large amounts of jet fuel, very different to a rocket explosion on a non-flammable target. Then there's also the aircraft debris.

7 Fox news made fools of themselves hyping this thing,it is the same video shown in loose change and other conspiracy films,its been out there for years and it does not show a 757 hitting the pentagon."it"caused only a 16 foot hole in the building,there was no sign of any plane wreckage anywhere,and the outer wall of the pentagon didnt collapse for 20 minutes.This was directed at the few sheep that still follow bush on fox news.go to hunttheboeing.com and see for yourself.ha...ha...ho...ho...hee..hee..ha

8 Tim you are dim.

9 ABC actually has pretty fair coverage of this. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=1968996&page=1

10 Here are the 2 films received by Judicial Watch. The projectile can be seen on frame 126 of film 1 and frame 24 of film 2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L75Gga92WO8 Film 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAaP4Z3zls8 Film 2 Requests were made for some 50 videos that exist.

11 can anyone say pWn3d!!!!11 thats riighht. So much for this conspiracy crap.

12 This is what I would have expected the video to look like: http://www.checktheevidence.com/911/pentstrike-fake-example.gif

13 funny. Greg labels 'fair' as being any site/media that engages his crackpot theories. Hey Greg, how does it feel that your "staunchest" Hollywood supported as been outed as a wife beating, [prescription/underage|gay porn/gambling/prostitution] addict who not only has paranoid beliefs about 9/11 but also inoculations given to his children and feels the need to keep weapons under his coffee table? http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen1.html damn, he's almost as credible as you.

14 [tin foil cracked pot hat perched high and cockeyed] breaking: Video of DOD Stealth Vehicle with Invisible Cloaking Device Seen. Watch the 911 video till almost half way, then just before white barrier gate lifts look just to the left for the streak of atomized "free" energy "leaking" from the DOD cloaking device then "streaking" from left to right. The "free" energy then goes right along in front of the Pentagon toward the fire and smoke, then just in front of the fire and smoke its invisible disapears because the cloaking device is turned off and you can actually see the classified vehicle as it turns away from the building. Leaking Cloaking Device Reveals Secret 911 Plot This is Bullet Proof Proof, the CIA/DOD Bush, Cheney and Halliburton are behind 911 attacks. [/tin foil cracked pot hat perched high and cockeyed] [artifact]

15 I don't get all the hype over the film either. I've seen one like it dozens of times. And the frame-by-frame was much, much better than what Foxnews showed. Pictures of the BMW engine just inside the wreckage didn't convince greg and his gullible friends either. Oh yeah, the military (or is it the DoD? Oh well, who ever it was...) must be using BMW engines to power their missles that they send flying over busy highways and office buildings and then they send in Obe Wan Kenobe to tell everyone, "This is not the missle you're looking for. It is only a plane. Move along." Oh yeah, and I forgot to mention that they painted the missile with American Airlines colors and logos to fool people: http://media.popularmechanics.com/images/0305911-flight77-sm.jpg

16 Actually, 757s have either Rolls Royce or Pratt and Whitney engines, not BMW. I'm not saying I buy into the "no 757 hit the Pentagon" angle, though.

17 I stand corrected. It was Rolls Royce, not BMW. For some reason I had BMW on my mind. This particular one was not Pratt or Whitney though. Its my understanding that they even identified the particular engine by its serial numbers.

18 Oyster:"Its my understanding that they even identified the particular engine by its serial numbers." No. You stand corrected again. If you have this info, please produce it. I'm not going to defend the "no 757" angle, but I won't tolerate BS either.

19 Watch the 911 video till almost half way, then just before white barrier gate lifts look just to the left for the streak of atomized "free" energy "leaking" from the DOD cloaking device then "streaking" from left to right. The "free" energy then goes right along in front of the Pentagon toward the fire and smoke, then just in front of the fire and smoke its invisible disapears because the cloaking device is turned off and you can actually see the classified vehicle as it turns away from the building. Leaking Cloaking Device Reveals Secret 911 Plot It was a security car you boob.

20 YOU won't tolerate BS? That's a laugh. I don't know if I'll ever find that info again but I'll try.

21 thanks for that wow!

22 Oyster:"I don't know if I'll ever find that info again but I'll try." Save yourself the trouble. It doesn't exist. You confabulated it.

23 In the link posted by "Oyster", with the picture of the debris... My question about that picture is how the entire plane pretty much vanished except for that piece of 'not so sturdy' aircraft skin, which landed a couple hundred yards from the building. I understand that you did not take the picture and you aren't required to defend it, but isn't that a little bit curious?

24 Brown, it's only one of likely thousands of pictures taken that day. I'm sure more will be declassified as time goes by. And no, I don't find it curious. Why? Do you? They planted it, didn't they? Those conspiratorial rascals!

25 Finally!! The proof needed to shut up these conspiracy theorists has been released, the video showing the plane. Now these nuts can go back to questioning the moon landing! Uh-oh. Might be losing my mind myself. Now that I see the video, I'm not sure what I see. It is a ways back from the camera, but it seems small. Wish we could see more of the plane. Seems awful level too, didn't it just make some crazy descending turn that these nuts said was impossible? Guess the guy was a pretty decent pilot to level that thing out after such a quick descent. Looks to be pretty low too. Low enough that the engines would of dragged in the lawn? Nah, there weren't any marks on the lawn, those nuts were quick to point that out. Remember? Now I'm really thinking about what these nuts have been saying. That 757 made a tight, spiraling descent at 400-500 mph, leveled off just a few feet from the ground, just high enough not to damage the lawn, and then struck the very bottom of the pentagon. Again, keeping the lawn intact. When the plane hit the building the wings vaporized, and the fuselage went through the infamous 16-foot hole. The fuselage then continued on through 2 more rings of the pentagon where it made another 16-foot hole, and then it also vaporized. WTH are these nuts questioning anyway???

26 whatever happened to the 2 trillion dollars donald rumsfeld lost on september 10th 2001 but after the attacks it got swept under the rug explain that this is a well documented case 2 many people had 2 much to gain for this not 2 be an inside job because the worse thing is if 1 percent is true were in a lot of trouble,and besides that a former member of bushs cabinet named morgan reynolds has come out and said this was an inside job so if anyone can explain this rationally without name calling and discrediting something our government has become good at after 9/11 let me know and at least look up the info ive included i just want a better future hopefully you want the same.