Pro-terrorist and leftwing publications already calling the whole operation a U.S. plot. Al Jazeera.com (not to be confused with al Jazeera.net, which is the real Al Jazeera):
By 'another Fallujah' this man is referring to widespread reports in the Arab press and left-wing media of U.S. massacres of civilians.
1
As for me, all the U.S. troops who are stuck in Iraq and who do not want to be there are hostages too.
Posted by: Collin Baber at April 17, 2005 12:32 AM (fufbw)
2
Shows what a low life little sneak Colon Babeler is. Only, a lying little creep would sneak back where it wasn't wanted.
Lack of character here. No personal pride. But we always knew that.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 17, 2005 08:04 AM (7bKVh)
3
>>>"Husseini said about 100 masked militants drove through Madain, capturing Shiite youngsters and old men."
These are Michael Moore's "minutemen", who take old people hostage and use the mentally retarded as suiciders. They are the REVOLUTION, he says.
Posted by: Carlos at April 17, 2005 09:32 AM (8e/V4)
4
What I don't understand is why they took hostages. Is there that much difference between Shites and Sunnis? What is to be gained?
I guess just a sick response when losing.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 17, 2005 11:45 AM (sqa1t)
5
Not that much difference between Shiites and Sunnies. However the Kuran says dont become a Shiite because they will serve time in hell.
Posted by: Anwar at April 17, 2005 01:36 PM (YY5vs)
Posted by: sparky at April 17, 2005 03:29 PM (F1nba)
7
Anwar: You are kidding right. You mean Shiites are like, Catholics, Buddists, Hindus, atheists, Protestants, Jews, etc?.
We all go to hell and the Sunni's are the only ones going to heaven.
Everyone is wrong but the Sunnis. Saddams guys right. Uday was a Sunni right. Chemical Ali was a Sunni right. They took a about 100 old people and children hostage yesterday. Was that is the name of God? Yea right on! Shining example of Sunnis in action. Model citizens. I understand now. OOOOOOOOKay.
Please going to left and read Jawas explained. Your salvation is there.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 17, 2005 04:15 PM (sqa1t)
8
Sigh... If u didnt already know, pretty much every religion condems all that dont follow it. Shiites will only go to hell for their sins and for the fact that they are Shiites. Then they will go to heaven.
Posted by: Anwar at April 17, 2005 05:52 PM (9iPOQ)
9
Congrajulations Rooster! I think this is the first post you have wrote without any profanity in it. Good for you

!
Posted by: Anwar at April 17, 2005 05:54 PM (9iPOQ)
10
"Sparky: Why?"
Cuz Shiites are a buncha rebels that think the Prophet Mohammeds friend or cousing or something but his name was Ali and they think he shoulda have taken over after the prophet died instead of some other guy. Something like that. Its really silly though. But yeah, there is a lot of other stuff they disagree on with the Sunnis. I really dont know much about this issue but I used to know a Shiite guy. The guy wants to convert everybody into a Shiite. Lol he was crazy. Everytime he talks about something, its about his silly beliefs and arguments.
Posted by: Anwar at April 17, 2005 06:01 PM (9iPOQ)
11
I really need to proofread:S.
Posted by: Anwar at April 17, 2005 06:02 PM (9iPOQ)
Posted by: sparky at April 17, 2005 06:19 PM (F1nba)
13
How can you tell a sunni from a shiite?
He can burp in two languages.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 17, 2005 08:36 PM (sqa1t)
14
Why do Sunnis pray 5 times a day?
Because they sin more than regular people.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 17, 2005 08:37 PM (sqa1t)
15
Why does a Sunni go to mosque?
It's the only place he knows with an indoor toilet.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 17, 2005 08:39 PM (sqa1t)
16
Asshole Gooster:
Lol very funny Gooster. I have learned to not take offense to your idiotic posts.
Posted by: Anwar at April 17, 2005 08:53 PM (9iPOQ)
17
Sparky: Yup

. Iam a Sunni Canadian.
Posted by: Anwar at April 17, 2005 08:57 PM (9iPOQ)
18
He's a sinister syrian spy disquised as a Canadian cowboy. He's easy to spot at the Calgary Stampede. His horse has a big hump.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 17, 2005 10:16 PM (sqa1t)
19
Thats why Canada has mad cow desease. MAD Sunnis humping the COWS equals MAD COWS.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 17, 2005 10:20 PM (sqa1t)
20
His horse has a big hump.
LMAO! dude, you're on a roll.
Posted by: Carlos at April 17, 2005 10:24 PM (paKD6)
21
"He's a sinister syrian spy disquised as a Canadian cowboy. He's easy to spot at the Calgary Stampede. His horse has a big hump."
LOL.
Gooster can you please tell me why you hate me so much?? Lol, if I was a terrorist then you have the right to hate me but Iam not so whats the problem here. I have a right to hate you because you hate my religion, my people, and my way of life. Why, I dont know. Everyday you come up with some new reason to hate, hate, hate. Your a hater. From all the posts you have put up in the month of April I think I have come up with a possible conclusion on this hate issue of yours. From what I readm Iam pretty sure you hate jews, blacks, homosexuals, and ESPECIALLY Muslims.
Lol maybe you just hate me because I disagree with your thoughts/opinions/reasonings. Maybe you hate everybody that disagrees with you. If thats the case then you are a sore loser.
And do you have something against camels?
But hey, who cares if some old retired guy thinks that Muslims suck?
Posted by: Anwar at April 17, 2005 10:28 PM (Tyl0K)
22
Btw, your jokes are stupid. Oh yeah and you dont know how to spell disease. Its not "desease", its disease. You need to proofread too.
Posted by: Anwar at April 17, 2005 10:31 PM (Tyl0K)
23
Someone criticizes the Sunnis taking 100 hostages and now they are a racist?
Anwar needs to distance himself from these thugs or be judged with them. Anwar, you are judged by the company you keep. Either renounce these criminals or have the balls to say you stand with them. If your with them, calling someone a racist is pretty weak considering what you have done to 100 innocent people.
WHERE IS YOUR COMDEMNATION?
Posted by: Brad at April 17, 2005 10:58 PM (M7kiy)
24
Dear Brad,
Would you be willing to renounce preemptive war?
Posted by: Collin Baber at April 17, 2005 11:27 PM (FV4oJ)
25
Wooptiedoo, they freed most of em already, those kidnappers were pretty useless against an army.
Preemptive war against Canada just to get Anwar? Go ahead, do it, would be the first time countries with WoMDs start fighting each other since WW2. Might have interesting results, and if you win, you can get a huge amount of wood, furs and maple syrup.
Posted by: A Finn at April 18, 2005 01:30 AM (cWMi4)
26
Could this entire muslims kidnapping muslims thing be just bullshit. I mean who would want one.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 18, 2005 06:32 AM (OJsiJ)
27
A Fin: You have been going off the deep end lately. Just say no to drugs. You are hallucinating and putting things into a conversation that were not there. If you feel like invading Canada do it. However, no one else has indicated the same.
Time to do a reality check, sonny.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 18, 2005 06:38 AM (OJsiJ)
28
Anwar: I hate you because you lie. I have never said anything that can be construed by an intelligent person as I hate the Jews. Therefore you lie. I hate liars. Secondly, you are the one would came onto this blog with the anti jewish bullshit. Go back and check your posts. Remember, the I am an Arab post of yours. You accuse me of being that what you are. I hate you because you cheer for the Sunni muslim assholes killing innocents in the middle east.
I hate you because you are stupid enough to side with low life traitors like Collin Baber.
I hate you because you lie and say I hate all Blacks, homosexuals, etc. This is a lie.
I hate you because you are not smart enough to distance yourself from other lying moonbats on this blog. I hate you because you are weak and seek comfort from America's enemies on this blog.
I hate you because you are dumb enough to say I am a loser. The truth is I have won every major issue I have joined. Example, Getting rid of Saddam, the presidential election.
I hate you because you claim to be Canadian 1st and that is a lie. You have shown your true colors by your lack of neutrality in the Israel/Palestinian question.
I hate you because I know in my heart that muslims moving to the Americas will cause problems for my children and grand children.
Muslims should not be allowed on this continent because of what I see in every other country muslims have moved to. They are bad for the peace of the world.
Nothing personal. Just the facts as I see them.
Now do you understand.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 18, 2005 06:56 AM (OJsiJ)
29
Oh, I forgot. I hate you because I am a racist. I am a racist because I think white people are the greatest on earth. I am a racist because I think white people are getting the short end of the stick in America. I am a racist because I am against the anti white liberal bullshit prevalent in American society.
Example: My father was killed in WW2. Started by a cowardly sneak attack on Americans sleeping and attending church on a Sunday morning. If the son of the Jap who killed my father moved to America he would be given job preference over me by federal, state, and city governments. I am against this policy. therefore, I am a racist. Ask any moonbat, liberal shithead. I am a product of my enviroment. And I am growing. Telling the truth is racist in America.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 18, 2005 07:14 AM (OJsiJ)
30
Anwar:
Who cares about a old retired guy who thinks muslims suck?
YOU DO.
If you spent more time checking your own spelling. You wouldn't look so stupid when you comment on mine. Another liberal dumbass thing.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 18, 2005 07:22 AM (OJsiJ)
31
Why care? Just drink, love, ignore and reproduce, keep life simple and only interfere with things that you think are funny enough to mess with.
Posted by: A Finn at April 18, 2005 08:39 AM (eFE81)
32
greyrooster
There's no Truth in the bull shit you just posted.....White people get the short end of the stick....hahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahaha
Posted by: None Of Yours at April 18, 2005 08:40 AM (22t5y)
33
Anwar,
Libs and Arabs and muslims do plenty of hating of their own. We all hate, so you're no better than the next guy. The only difference is what we've chosen to hate.
Posted by: Carlos at April 18, 2005 09:45 AM (paKD6)
34
Anwar
Suppose the premise is correct that only the Sunni's will attain the reward of heavan, and that all others will go to hell. What is the basis for the line of thinking that the ones not to be saved must be sent to hell now?
Posted by: Defense Guy at April 18, 2005 12:18 PM (jPCiN)
35
Good point.
Obviously, none of yours doesn't know a thing about Federal and State guidelines in hiring. So the turkey is to be ignored.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 18, 2005 02:45 PM (OJsiJ)
36
Defense Guy:
All religions condemn its non believers. Islam wasnt the first one to condemn its non believers to hell.
Posted by: Anwar at April 18, 2005 02:57 PM (4R894)
37
Gooster: Racists are people that hate you because of your race. They dont know you but once they find out that you are arab they start hating you. If you are against every single Muslim on this planet just for the fact that they are Muslim then you are a religionist/racist. If you piss on the Kuran then you are a racist. If you are a racist rooster, then you are a bad person.
Posted by: Anwar at April 18, 2005 03:02 PM (4R894)
38
Anwar: I give reasons why I hate. I say who I hate. This makes me more truthful than most.
Have you read Jawas explained yet? You are a Jawa. Your religious zealot Jihad is a Tusken Raider. We must watch both of you. Not you as much as Jihad, but must keep an eye out. The fact that you make us uncomfortable is why you shouldn't be here. We did not cause this uncomfortable feeling. YOU DID. You, your religion and the lunatics who subscribe to its backward bullshit.
The hatred and mistrust shown to the followers of Islam is caused by the followers of Islam. We do not have this mistrust of Hindus, Buddists, Shindoist, Protestants, Catholics or any other religions. We don't give a damn about voodoo or Santeria. Why because they haven't given us cause to. Islam has. You and others like you are grouped with the Islamofacists because to do not condemn them or their followers. You refrain from condemning the Sunni murderers, etc. When muslims cry out loudly against Islamic terrorists who condone beheadings, bombings and murder then we will listen to you and yours. Not until.
If other religions condemn others to hell because they believe differently as least they do it quitely. Instead of the calls for death and destruction that your religion screams for.
I cannot talk for others, but my hate for Islam is because Islam worked hard to get me to hate them.
As A FINN has said: Better to drink, eat, fornicate, go fishing and have fun than to spend my valuable time making speeches against Islam. America has been good to me. I have worked hard to set myself up for a comfortable exciting existence. I could ignore the Islamic threat, but that would be selfish. you see, I have children and grand children. It would not be wise to ignore a threat to their future. Their future is threatened by two major things. Islam and liberalism. My parade is not driven by hate. Rather one of there is a snake in the house and I must get rid of it before it bites someone. When you take a believeable stand against the Islamofacists. Then I will look at you as an equal. Until then, you represent the enemy. Whether you wish to be or not. Hateful? Call it whats you will. I call it meeting a real challenge to the peace and dignity of the world.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 18, 2005 03:24 PM (OJsiJ)
39
And quit saying if I believe this or that I am a racist. I admit it. I am a racist. What pisses me off is that you other racists will not admit it. I have already given you a thousand reasons that cause me to be a racist. Need another thousand?
Posted by: greyrooster at April 18, 2005 03:31 PM (OJsiJ)
40
Anwar: Your reply to Defense Guy sounds like a 3 three year old. He did it first, ya, ya,. They did it first, ya,ya. If they do it first makes it okay right!!!! Muslim thinking. Yuk. Children, merely children. And must be treated as such. Spank em until they understand they can't do that.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 18, 2005 03:37 PM (OJsiJ)
41
Anwar
"Defense Guy:
All religions condemn its non believers. Islam wasnt the first one to condemn its non believers to hell."
It would help, I suppose, if you actually read the question I asked. Is there a difference between condemning non believers to hell and actually attempting to send them there?
Posted by: Defense Guy at April 18, 2005 04:06 PM (jPCiN)
42
Of the 41 posts on this string, 17 or 41% are from Greyrooster.
Rooster, quit flapping your furgina!
Posted by: greg at April 18, 2005 04:46 PM (/+dAV)
43
Anwar
Didnt you post that your wife was a christian?
If so i really dont understand how you can condone this behaviour.
I would like to know your wife's opinion on this matter.
What we shouldnt forget is this is not a war against a Religion at least its not supposed to be. Remember the solidiers in Iraq are helping iraqis and the majority of them are muslim.
Why do you think the terrorists are targeting their own countrymen? This i'll never understand. If you are against a regime why kill your fellow countrymen? THATS NUTS ! Or could it be that the terrorists in Iraq are from neibouring countries and thats why so many innocents are being killed. Now its becoming a sectarian war.
I just wish the people who have iraq's best interests at heart would be left to get on with running the country, where the people can have Electricity anytime day or night, or running hot water or food to feed their children. Most importantly an Education system where they are not taught that, all in the world that is Evil is the West, because that seems to be a big problem over there.
These are all little things that we take every day for granted. I cannot imagine a life where your Government could shoot you dead in the street or slaughter your family because he didnt like your face, or dare i say it, your Religion. I would bloodly well want someone to come and say this must stop. Saddam was living like a king while his people were living in poverty and he was killing them.
GREEDY EVIL B$£$%$£%
Do you think the problem in Iraq is that the terrorists dont want the people of Iraq to know anything, that it suits them for people to be ignorant of the facts or the outside world. Not that i am saying it is wrong but These people have choices and its high time they were allowed to make their own. Its no-one place to tell you whats right or wrong for you. Let them make their own minds up.
Oh and the men who flew those planes lived the high life in the West I might add drinking beer and going with women. That to me makes them Hypocrites not martyrs as some would like to believe.
Oh and Selfish into the bargain.
Phew, now im puffed out.
Posted by: sparky at April 18, 2005 05:30 PM (F1nba)
44
Greg
you have to admit that, Calgery Camel Comment
was hilarious even Anwar thought that was funny. To treat that other than a joke would be wrong
Posted by: sparky at April 18, 2005 05:37 PM (F1nba)
45
"It would help, I suppose, if you actually read the question I asked. Is there a difference between condemning non believers to hell and actually attempting to send them there?"
Defense Guy: The Quran doesnt say anything about killing the non believers. In fact there is a famous ayah in the Kuran of the prophet Mohammed telling a non believer that tried to convert him that: You dont believe in what I believe in and I dont belive in what you believe in, I have my own religion, and so do you. This means that muslims should not be using force against non beleivers in an attempt to convert them. They should definetly not be killing all that oppose Islam. In the Quran it also says to let the non believers be, Allah will deal with them in the afterlife.
Posted by: Anwar at April 18, 2005 06:07 PM (4R894)
46
Sparky: Yes, I agree with all that you said. I really dont understand why there are Sunnis taking Shiites hostage. Its all very silly. Anyone, who takes any religion too seriously is silly.
P.S. My wife doesnt like politics. She watches Al Jazeera or CNN from time to time and she says it makes her sick.
Posted by: Anwar at April 18, 2005 06:16 PM (4R894)
47
I have to say i agree with her
Posted by: sparky at April 18, 2005 06:27 PM (F1nba)
48
Anwar: Is progress being made? Your statements concerning the terrorists are a begining? In reality they didn't really have much convincing fervor. I question where you put in "should not be killing all who oppose Islam" Ah, you sly little arab you. The word ALL is the key. Just Americans and their allies huh. An excuse if Jihad pays you a visit? Must be careful what you say. Who knows, some Sunni fanatic from your mosque may be reading your posts.
Chop, chop.
Greg, you traitorous little shit. There is plenty of room for you to speak your insanity. That is if you start telling the truth for a change.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 18, 2005 07:43 PM (OJsiJ)
49
Sparky: Up tight? Try scotch and water. It works for me. And probably a lot cheaper for you.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 18, 2005 07:55 PM (OJsiJ)
50
Mr friend Greyrooster,
Usually hatred is based on fear. The Bushian War Cult has done an excellent job baiting and switching us to follow him and his crusade. You can say no any time.
Posted by: Collin Baber at April 18, 2005 07:56 PM (FV4oJ)
51
I don't speak to traitors. In Particular to ones who have been banned and are so shameless they sneak back on. Then again, traitors have no shame.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 18, 2005 09:20 PM (OJsiJ)
52
My friend Greyrooster,
This person is a patriot, has no guilt and feels no shame.
Posted by: Collin Baber at April 18, 2005 10:56 PM (FV4oJ)
53
I don't speak to traitors.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 19, 2005 06:11 AM (K/qjk)
54
My friend Greyrooster,
There is no need to be afraid. Deep in your soul, you are not a racist.
Posted by: Collin Baber at April 19, 2005 06:14 AM (FV4oJ)
55
But he is a racist, don't take that away from him, he'd become terribly disoriented.
Hey Rooster,
Let's say you're fishin' for tuna in the gulf and you come upon a Vietnamese American fisherman that has capsized his boat and is clinging on to it for dear life. What would you do, rescue him or cut him up and use him for shark bait?
Let's say he was black.
Let's say he was Islamic.
Posted by: greg at April 19, 2005 08:22 AM (/+dAV)
56
Anwar
You should consider applying for the job of Martin Luther for Islam. Too many of those running the show in the name of your religion do not appear to be on the same page as you, and it is giving you all a bad name.
Posted by: Defense Guy at April 19, 2005 12:29 PM (jPCiN)
57
Greg
I bet you he would save him regardless!
Posted by: sparky at April 19, 2005 05:38 PM (F1nba)
58
"You should consider applying for the job of Martin Luther for Islam. Too many of those running the show in the name of your religion do not appear to be on the same page as you, and it is giving you all a bad name."
Defense Guy: Lol, Iam an Enginner, not a Politician.
Those who run the show for Islam have such deep hatred for America and Israel that it blinds them and makes the extremists in their eyes the good guys and America/Israel the bad ones. They fail to see the evil in the hearts of the extremists. A lot of Muslims do see that what the extremists are doing is bad and against Islam but unfortunately there is still a number of Muslims that support Bin Laden and his regime against America/Israel/Non Belivers.
It is against Islam to blow up schools full of children. It is against Islam to kidnap Iraqi officials and behead them because they are working with America. It is against Islam to kill Hindus just because their not Muslim.
These terrorists are not good Muslims at all. Their just using Islam as an excuse and making the religion look hatefull and horrific.
Posted by: Anwar at April 19, 2005 06:14 PM (9cHDR)
59
No Sparky, there is a bigger chance that this drowning Muslim man would somehow swim to shore and survive, then there is a chance that Rooster would save his ass. This Crazy Man Rooster told me he pisses on the Kuran. Daily. I mean even if he did save this man, it wouldnt work out. You dont save someone belonging to a religion that you hate. Maybe one day he would come to visit the man that saved his life and find him pissing on a Kuran. Imagine his reaction. LOL. Rooster would get murked by the man that he once saved!
Posted by: Anwar at April 19, 2005 06:56 PM (9cHDR)
60
Anwar
I seriously think you dont realise that half the time he is just looking to cause a commontion. Maybe im wrong but call it intuition, i dont think he would leave a man to die because he was black or muslim.
I think what people tend to missunderstand and judge about him is the fact the he is pro white. What he is saying is if black and muslims or anyone for that matter is allowed to differentiate or discriminate then why arent white's? Its simple really, some of the points he makes, make sense. I am sure he plays it up for effect and he is seriously funny at times. It does get people going doesnt it.
Admittedly when i first started to read his posts
i thought is this guy serious!
Maybe i have read him wrong and i am sure he will let me know in no uncertain terms if he disagrees, which he will and i will be the butt of his next joke but thats ok i dont mind
Point being Anwar a lot of people on this site think it is wrong what he says and sometimes he does go a little mad but if he were not white saying these things then all whites would be expected to be tolerant anyone objecting to their speech would be accused of being racist. do you get what i mean?
Anyway Anwar prepare for the onslaught, me im going to hide so he cant find me
Posted by: sparky at April 19, 2005 07:38 PM (F1nba)
61
If he were vietnamese. I would tell him I would rescue him if he promised not to speak vietnamese all day on channel 16.
If he were black it would be a non-issue. Those guys sink like rocks.
If he were Islamic. I would ask if he were Sunni. If he said no and shouted Osama is an asshole I would save him. If not. Shark bait. But I wouldn't cut him up. I would run over him with my 32" prop. Now that's what we call Islamochum.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 19, 2005 08:10 PM (K/qjk)
62
Anwar: Where is your CONDEMATION? I am a Mechanical Engineer. One thing I learned during 17 years as co-owner of a Engineering firm. Arabs and other middle easterners make shitty Engineers. Everyone we had to replace due to incompetence, cried that we were racists and attempted to get his job back thru the courts. The fact that he couldn't/wouldn't do his job apparently didn't cross his mind.
I never went to court. My two partners always did. Tagi and Frederick Sabour (means peaceful in Farsi). Both born in Iran.
Again where is your CONDEMATION of the Sunni murderers?
Posted by: greyrooster at April 19, 2005 08:28 PM (K/qjk)
63
Oh yea! The fact that mine was the only firm in the Bay area that gave them a chance skipped their minds. Some told me they had been looking for work in their profession for up to two years. Now they are back looking.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 19, 2005 09:27 PM (K/qjk)
64
Anwar: which branch of Canadian government to you work for. The city, the province or the commonwealth? Are you a civil engineer?
Posted by: greyrooster at April 19, 2005 09:29 PM (K/qjk)
65
rooster,
Anwar's right, cut him some slack. He's the good kind of muslim we're trying to encourage to speak out. Being a muslim isn't a crime if they mind their own business.
Posted by: Carlos at April 20, 2005 07:43 AM (tFXpR)
66
"Being a muslim isn't a crime if they mind their own business."-Carlos
Carlos,
Are you getting soft man!
Posted by: greg at April 20, 2005 09:31 AM (/+dAV)
67
greg,
it's a little something called "nuance".
Posted by: Carlos at April 20, 2005 09:38 AM (tFXpR)
68
We should encourage Moslems who interpret the Koran as NOT stating they must kill infidels.
Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 20, 2005 11:28 AM (x+5JB)
69
"We should encourage Moslems who interpret the Koran as NOT stating they must kill infidels."-YBP
Yes we should, but making war on Islam is not going to get it done.
Posted by: greg at April 20, 2005 02:38 PM (/+dAV)
70
Rooster: What do you mean wheres my condemnation? I condemn all Sunni Muslims that take Shiites people hostage. Why? First of all if they were good muslims they wouldnt be doing that. Second of all, its stupid and not the right way to achieve their goal. Whatever it is :/.
Wow, how did you know I was a Civil Engineer? I work for the city.
"If he were Islamic. I would ask if he were Sunni. If he said no and shouted Osama is an asshole I would save him. If not. Shark bait. But I wouldn't cut him up. I would run over him with my 32" prop. Now that's what we call Islamochum."
What if the guy WAS Sunni and told you he was Sunni when you asked him. But he is against Bin Ladens Regime. Would you save him?
Posted by: Anwar at April 20, 2005 02:48 PM (dnn8b)
71
What if the guy WAS Sunni and told you he was Sunni when you asked him. But he is against Bin Ladens Regime. Would you save him?
Anwar,
yes, we would save him.
Posted by: Carlos at April 20, 2005 03:03 PM (tFXpR)
72
Anwar: I guessed that you were a civil engineer and worked for a government agency because
Ah, I'm going to give you some slack and not tell you why.
I will say there is nothing civil about a civil engineer.
I noticed that you said the words taking Shiite people hostage. Again, you sly little arab you. This time you slipped in the word Shiite. Gives you an out Huh! Can't fool the greyrooster. Still afraid Jihad will pay you a visit?
If he were Sunni. I would hold him hostage for money after dragging him around the ocean for a while. Because I would know he was lying. A Sunni is a Sunni. A racist is a racist. They will not change. Nor will I.
Soon the Sunni trouble makers in Iraq will be rewarded for their deeds. America will try to protect them but the Shiites and Kurds will have their revenge. It's an Arab thing.
Now say after me. It is wrong to take anyone hostage. It is wrong to blow up people sitting at restaurants in Israel. It is wrong to kidnap civilians. It is wrong to kill innocent civilians. It is wrong to crash planes into buildings. It is wrong to force your religion on others. It is wrong not the accept the majority decision of an election. It is wrong to stand while taking a crap.
When you say these things without reservation. Then I may enter into equal dialogue with you. Until then you are just another camel jockey.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 20, 2005 03:15 PM (aq8Ok)
73
Carlos: First Colon Babeler, now Anwar. Who is next. Greg? You worry me.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 20, 2005 03:24 PM (aq8Ok)
74
Rooster's a bare-backed ass jockey.
Posted by: greg at April 20, 2005 04:12 PM (/+dAV)
75
Greg is exposing his ass again. Something he does whenever a male is around. Man, dog, donkey. All the same to him. This traitorous dog has a sign on his ass saying pay as you enter. All credit cards accepted. Double green stamps on tuesdays. Muslims enter free. Bring your camel.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 20, 2005 08:32 PM (aq8Ok)
76
You people are slow. The one about the vietnamese on channel 16 was hilarious. Islamochum was almost as good. Is there no friggin fisherpersons out there? The one about the raghead cabbie and the liberty bell should be a classic for all time. The only one anyone got of the horse with the hump. Damn it boy! Wake up!
Intellecturals my ass.
Shit! The guys with the hoods on the river would pick up on these jokes. Am I joking over your heads?
Am I dealing with a bunch of shut ins who never go anywhere or experience anything besides a computer keyboard?
Posted by: greyrooster at April 20, 2005 08:48 PM (aq8Ok)
77
Update: They found bodies in the Tigris and outside the city. How many Zarqawis are there?
Posted by: Collin Baber at April 21, 2005 03:39 AM (FV4oJ)
78
Rooster
hates black people because he's got the white man's penis envy.
Posted by: greg at April 21, 2005 09:34 AM (/+dAV)
79
This is for Rooster.
It is wrong to take anyone hostage. It is wrong to blow up people sitting at restaurants in Israel. It is wrong to kidnap civilians. It is wrong to kill innocent civilians. It is wrong to crash planes into buildings. It is wrong to force your religion on others. It is wrong not the accept the majority decision of an election.
Happy?
Now YOU repeat after ME. I will not insult Muslims by saying hateful things like I piss on the Kuran. I will not get angry and hate somebody just because they dont have the same opinion as I. I will not run around and call all my buddys that know or dont know the Jawa Report and tell them to vote yes on banning Collin. I will not think that all Muslims are terrorists.
Posted by: Anwar at April 21, 2005 06:09 PM (QeEbb)
80
Notice Greg the traitor is back to the fixation on dicks again. A good Catholic. I thought the church was getting rid of perverts.
Can you see this asshole in the confessional. Bless me father for I have sinned. I talk, dream, thing about and wish for sucking dicks and fucking asses all day. But I am a good Catholic.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 21, 2005 07:50 PM (CBNGy)
81
Anwar:
You forgot it is wrong to stand while taking a crap.
I will not get angry and hate somebody just because they don't have the same opinion as I.
The rest is bullshit and I will not swear to them.
I will continue to piss on the Kuran until Osama is caught.
I you are saying I cheated on the vote. You are a liar. A muslim thing.
I will not think all muslims are terrorists? I believe all terrorists are muslims. I believe Islam breeds terrorists so Islam and terrorist are the same.
I believe anyone who is friendly with Colon Babeler cannot be trusted.
I believe muslims should stay in their own messed up countries. Countries they messed up because of their religion. If they screwed up their countries with their stupid religion we are fools to let them come here.
I believe we are at war with Islamofacists. This is a war. Not a personality contest.
I believe muslims cause problems and hatred where ever they go.
I believe muslims produce nothing, invent nothing and are a backward people.
I believe most muslims are to stupid to change.
How's that for today's hate message.
I anything I said is untrue please prove it.
Posted by: greyrooster at April 21, 2005 08:14 PM (CBNGy)
82
Anwar,
email me at roach747@yahoo.com
Posted by: Collin Baber at April 22, 2005 02:42 AM (FV4oJ)
83
well i guess all of u are going in the wrong direction i might have not read "most" of what had been posted here, but i can still assure u that something is wrong over here,
dude, whatever ur opinions are just drop it and forget about cults and races and all the other fucking bullshit u've been talking crap about, i am a shiite, i dont hate sunnis i dont hate christians i dont hate jews, i only hate those who hate me for who i might belong to or who even underestimate me
anyway here's something really stupid i read the other day lol it makes me laugh my fucking ass out:
One day during the period of Muslim rule in Spain, Imaam Abu Muhammad ibn Hazm was having a debate with some Spanish Catholic priests about their religious texts. He brought before them evidence of textual distortions in the Bible and the loss of original manuscripts. When they replied by pointing out to him Shi`ite claims also being distorted, Ibn Hazm informed them that Shi`ite could not be used as evidence against the Quraan or against Muslims because they are not themselves Muslims." [Ibn Hazm, al-Fisaal fee al-Milal wa an-Nihal, 2/78 and 4/182] Their claims have been rebutted by numerous other early scholars like Ibn Taymeeyah in Minhaaj as-Sunnah, adh-Dhahabee in Muntaqaa min Minhaaj al-I`tidaal, Ibn Katheer in his history book [al-Bidaayah wa an-Nihaayah], Ibn al-Jawzee in Talbees Iblees, and al-Qaadee ibn al-`Arabee in al-`Awwaasim min al-Qawaasim.
NOW could u plz tell me who the fuck does that guy consider himself to decide that shiis are infidels? lmfao shit! that freak was comparing the distortion of the "bible" to the shiite claims!! fuck! how near is the bible to such claims anyway? wonderful! and who is he anyway to make his decision about shiis? i mean who ever gave him the right to classify shiites as non-muslims? i wonder if good sent him an sms prior to that so claimed to be debate!
he neither has the right to falsify christians nor the right to disgrace shiites, noone has such rights, besides, who knows! it might turn out that buddhists are the only ones to be allowed in heaven!
open up fellows, ur doors are still locked up
we all still have a long journey ahead of us, lets not get so distracted by our foolish and unrational primitive thoughts
Posted by: sickcycle at April 29, 2005 05:46 PM (iDddD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment