November 08, 2004

Whores for Bush?

Yeah, but what about the hooker vote? (via QandO)

Question Three, which sought to ban prostitution in the rural county, was defeated by a two-to-one margin in Tuesday's election. In 1974, county voters supported letting two brothels operate outside Fallon.

George Flint of the Nevada Brothel Association says the vote stunned him and he's never been so surprised in his life. Alan Perazzo of the Coalition to End Prostitution in Churchill County says he's also shocked that two-thirds of county voters rejected the measure.

The county is a Republican stronghold that gave overwhelming support to President Bush. Fallon, a ranching and military community, is 60 miles east of Reno.

Flint says he now thinks the shuttered Salt Wells Villa brothel 15 miles east of Fallon eventually will reopen.

Posted by: Rusty at 04:54 PM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 133 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Fallon is a lovely community on the Walker river. It has a Naval Air Station and Coast Guard base. Gotta keep them boys happy. The whole area around Fallon has less whores than in 1 city block of San Francisco. Don't believe me? Go to the tenderloin district and try to park your car on the street. The ones at legal brothels are given health checks weekly. The ones on the streets of San Francisco will give you aids. Never understood why a person would give their hard earned money to an overpriced whore. But, then again, I've given the casinos. What's the big deal? Republicans are pro business.

Posted by: greyrooster at November 08, 2004 06:51 PM (aq8Ok)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
16kb generated in CPU 0.0182, elapsed 0.1251 seconds.
118 queries taking 0.1185 seconds, 245 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.