September 09, 2004
Crow on fork, inches from mouth
I've tasted it before. It's not good. The waiter and chef seem nice enough even if the dish washer did a lousy job. Desert? Something in civilized bar form, deep fried of course. Sprinkles on top.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Posted by: Rusty at
04:05 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 48 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Expressing skepticism is no reason to eat crow. A critical faculty is, hopefully, something that separates the VRWC from its opponents.
So, any guesses how CBS is going to spin this?
Posted by: Flea at September 09, 2004 04:25 PM (gEp3s)
2
Makes me wish I'd ignored your advice and blogged on it. Oh, well, maybe next time.
Posted by: Brian B at September 09, 2004 04:39 PM (OnnW3)
3
Whooaa. I said, "fork approaching mouth" not fork in mouth. Let's keep our metaphors straight here!!
Posted by: RS at September 09, 2004 05:05 PM (JQjhA)
4
Of course, CBS is denying that they're forgeries.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=40376
Posted by: Brian B at September 09, 2004 06:19 PM (OnnW3)
5
Hey it was nice to have a tempering voice to be honest, plus it shows we don't just all nod at each other and spread stupidity.
Anyway, this story isn't fully written yet...
Posted by: James at September 09, 2004 07:39 PM (rl/jf)
6
Rusty, when I saw the title of your post on a trackback somewhere, I almost choked, I was trying so hard to suppress my belly laugh at work. Keep it up, man! LOL
Posted by: Johnny Walker Red at September 09, 2004 09:41 PM (RWewD)
7
Flea is correct--you've no reason to apologize for not counting your chickens. You withheld judgement until there was a reasonable doubt in your mind. That''s A-OK with me.
Posted by: Victor at September 10, 2004 01:00 PM (L3qPK)
18kb generated in CPU 0.0162, elapsed 0.1647 seconds.
118 queries taking 0.1574 seconds, 251 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
118 queries taking 0.1574 seconds, 251 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
