The Da'wa Report
Via LGF, Jihad Watch is reporting that the letter Mahmoud Ahmagonnameetallah sent President Bush was more than just an invitation to sit down and settle our differences over tea and yellow cake.
Spencer says:
Both bolded statements suggest that the letter was indeed the call to Islam that must precede any attack, in accord with Muhammad's words (in Sahih Muslim 4294) about inviting the unbelievers to accept Islam or dhimmitude and fighting him only if he refuses both. We shall see.
The blog grandfather says:
Only a few blogs (and almost no mainstream media) have realized the truth about Iranian madman Ahmadinejad’s letter to President Bush. It was not an offer to negotiate, and it was not simply a lunatic’s rant. It was a calculated invitation to convert to Islam, a da’wa—an Islamic requirement (commanded by Mohammed) before waging war against unbelievers.
But whether or not Ahmadinejad (and the mullahs) are pragmatists playing chess, or else crazed religious fanatics poised to unleash some sort of devestating [sic] weapon on the world, what is unquestionable is that Ahmadinejad has positioned his pieces so as to appear ready to go to war.
So what to make of this?
I have questions, many questions.
I'm just too tired to answer them myself.
All I can think to do right now is to alert as many people as I can to the possibility that we are on the brink of a full-scale, all out war with Iran. In contrast with the small-scale, low-intensity war we've been in with Iran since 1979.
1
Time is running out fast. Unless we eradicate the entire arab population and the iranian/persian population--both subhuman filth undeserving of life, we will be mired in decades of intense holy war. American lives are precious, arabs, iranians, asians, mexicans, etc are not. Stop putting your head in the sand and start looking to Christ for guidance.
The end times are upon us, repent and take up arms as Jesus himself has commanded.
Posted by: Unashamed Patriot at May 12, 2006 12:23 AM (y+196)
2
Perhaps the Americans should reply to the madman's letter with a MOAB.
Stencilled on its tail fin -
Kind Regards
Dubya
Posted by: MathewK at May 12, 2006 12:55 AM (pVHqF)
3
Bingo....
War rides a fast horse.
The mullahs are coming for us.
I'd expect nuclear fireworks delivered by zombie.
Ahmadi-Nejad is radical not insane: HE BELIEVES.
Too scary!
Posted by: blert at May 12, 2006 01:05 AM (PipB8)
4
Look, "Patriot," if you're going to troll by pretending to be a conservative Christian, could you at least try and make it convincing? I mean, do you think conservatives are going to fall all over themselves agreeing with you? "YEAH! We should kill 'em all! YEE-HAW!!!" (bangbangbang)
Please get back to us when you have something useful to say.
Posted by: Evil Otto at May 12, 2006 05:16 AM (fcCt3)
5
This is shaping up nicely. We need an excuse to take down Iran, and they're working as hard as they can to provide us with one.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 12, 2006 05:58 AM (0yYS2)
6
Most people will never bother to read past the first page of this thing. It is a pretty shocking letter when you read through the whol thing. Now seeing this post, the letter makes much more sense as to why he bothered to write it at all.
Posted by: Fred Fry at May 12, 2006 07:13 AM (JXdhy)
7
Vinnie,
please ban that troll and delete every single one of his posts.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 12, 2006 07:37 AM (8e/V4)
8
Holy macaroni, He is indeed quoting the Quran that all believers of the book shall be united under Allah, and so, becoming a Muslim! If not, they (we) will bear the witness of the Muslims.
All right Ali Baba, so what you are saying is that, there is one God (Allah) and we must unite all under the same God (Allah) as long it is Allah!
"Do you feel lucky punk? Well, do you?"
Posted by: Dan at May 12, 2006 07:46 AM (Z2OsI)
9
Efficiency and progress is ours once more/ Now that we have the Neutron bomb / It's nice and quick and clean and gets things done... / Away with excess enemy / But no less value to property
And the other upside....... free oil !!!!!
Posted by: memphis761 at May 12, 2006 08:33 AM (D3+20)
Posted by: Vinnie at May 12, 2006 08:39 AM (/qy9A)
11
There are many in both Iran and the United States that seem to be working towards the same goal. Sports- wise we are in a slow season with only baseball teams to root for or against.
Posted by: john Ryan at May 12, 2006 12:00 PM (TcoRJ)
12
Both Washington and Tehran are having major poularity problems right now. The last Harris poll via the Wall Street Journal has Bush down to 29%. I am not sure that Tehran allows polls, but important parts of their population are not pleased with their government. War (or even talk of war) does tend to unify the masses tempoarily at least.WIthout the boogey man of the USA how long could Castro justify the condition of his country ?
Posted by: john Ryan at May 12, 2006 12:14 PM (TcoRJ)
13
Hi Vinnie. I linked to your post but keep getting trackback errors.
When confronted by a bully, sometimes it's necessary to punch him in the nose if he just won't back down and leave you alone. Negotiating with Ahmadinejad is ludicrous. The content of his letter to Bush proves there is no middle ground with him. We're gonna have to try something else in order to find a solution to America's problem with Iran (and jihadists). Maybe even something we haven't tried in about 61 years...
Posted by: reverse_vampyr at May 12, 2006 02:56 PM (Ns5kk)
14
This is truly scary. Sounds like they are going to throw the first nuke, but the sooner they realize that we have thousands to their dozens, the better.
Posted by: RepJ at May 12, 2006 03:29 PM (LRs9B)
15
This is crazy talk folks. From Iran, and those who are thinking about nukeing Iran now, before it is to late.
Don't get me wrong, I am on America's side. I just believe we should play out every last diplomatic chance we can. You see, there are problems on both sides. Iran supports Hamas, and Hezbolla, and have helped kill Americans.
We have invaded Panama, Grenda, Kosovo, Afganistan, and Iraq. We have them covered on all sides. We are at war around the world with Islamic crazys. Our special forces are hunting 24/7 for those who want to kill Americans. May G-d bless them, and their families.
What we should do, is go through the motions, and when it is all over, pull out of the U.N. Form a group of Democratic countries with trade ties, and get on white lighting for fuel.
The New World Order is dragging everyone into war. Out of chaos, order. Folks like us will suffer. Maybe, I am wrong, but I do not think so, and I do not think we will have to wait to long to find out.
Posted by: Leatherneck at May 12, 2006 04:36 PM (D2g/j)
16
No American life is worth the waste ... nuke Mecca! No American foot touch the God-forsaken soil!
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 13, 2006 11:46 AM (FCC6c)
17
It is cowardly and unconscienable to save
this fight for our children. Are there no
MEN left?
Put iran and islam down for the foreseeable future.
Haven't we learned from history that you
can not appease the nazis?? islam is the
nazis - do not be fooled and don't stand by
and be politically correct and delude
yourself as you, in your cowardice collude in the future subjugation and death of your
children......and mine
iran / islam not worth one American life.
I am willing to fight so my children can
grow up free.
What about you?
islam is clear - they want to dominate. So
lets call their bluff and kick their asses
once and for all and now
Fight Islam Now
Posted by: fight islam now at May 13, 2006 12:08 PM (Mx5AB)
18
I think you misconstrued my meaning fight islam now. I say there is nothing salvagable in the filthy holy land and we should save American lives by withdrawing all the troops and then nuking the whole area. No muss no fuss, presto chango!
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 14, 2006 08:30 AM (FCC6c)
1
Howie:
That's so unexpected, and so darn nice, I don't know what to say. Thankyou so very much. My sense of loss, though painful, is nothing to my sister's. He was a really wonderful guy and always seemed to have just the perfect balance between sobriety and humor (well, a little weighted toward the humor side actually). His name was Bill.
There probably won't be an actual funeral, but a rolling series of wake-like parties at various locations and times... which is something to look forward to. That would be the way he'd want to be remembered.
Posted by: Demosophist at May 11, 2006 03:05 PM (Zcruy)
2
Deep down I'm a big softy. Just like the other guy on that thread. I was really impresseed by him. He represents Muslims very well don't you think.
I agree when I go I want loud music and a keg.
Posted by: Howie at May 11, 2006 03:23 PM (D3+20)
3
Oh I try to read eclesiase chap 3 when stuff like that happens. Remember the time spend here was a gift. Hang in there andtake care of your sis and tell her we're thinkin of y'all.
Help Troops Keep It Cool
Found this on Conservative Thinking this morning. Adopt a soldier, help out buying cool scarves for our boys and girls sweating it out in Iraq.
Soldiers Angels We have heard from many deployed troops this week, everyone has the same thing to say,
IT IS HOT!! It is hard to think...
I would like to get cool scarf to every hero on our list, THE TEMPERATURES IN IRAQ ARE WELL OVER 100 DEGREES, and will stay that way till SeptemberÂ….
Â…We have over 12,000 heroes on this fourth deployment.
The scarves cost 1.20 and the shipping is 1.12, about 2.50 ea.
So in order to do this we need 25,000 dollars, not a small feat but these scarves help to keep their brains cool and offers comfort to our heroes.
Drop a picture of Mr. Lincoln and that covers two of our fine soldiers.
1
What they want Howie is a cold beer and a cool pond to go skinny dippin' in - neither of which is readily accessible ( I'm not even touching the subject of "fraternization").
This is one incredible hardship posting in ways you can't imagine!!!
Hell with the scarf - when the guys come home - show them a good time!
Old story - years ago got stuck on a long deployment in the Sinai .... desolate hellhole - boring!!!!
3 R&R options ...
a controlled tour of the pyramids
a controlled tour of the Holy City of Jeruselem
an uncontrolled visit to Berlin
needless to say ... I have never seen the pyramids or the Wailing Wall ... but I have seen n' done things .... WHOA!
Posted by: hondo at May 11, 2006 01:51 PM (SeBrl)
2
Hi I am a blogger from malaysia and I was wondering if you could put me in touch with your co-worker from Malaysia whos son served in Afghanistan. It would indeed be a proud honour for me to highlight someone from my country who has done us proud by helping to liberate the people of Afghanistan. Our governments conduct in allowing the innocent people there to live under the boot of the Taliban has been inexcusable and I am glad at least someone with a relation to our country is making things right.
Cheers
Carry-on Bag Update: Pork Leather?Packing update: In response to the many suggestions made by readers here about what I ought to take with me in my carry-on bag, just in case the fit hits the shan, the following thought occured to me:
Do they make a pig-skin leather?Because if they did, that would solve a lot of problems.
1
Take Last Gasp Human Shield Larry .... PLEASE!!!!
Posted by: hondo at May 11, 2006 11:09 AM (SeBrl)
2
Just carry a football (American version) on board, if trouble happens tell the Islamofacist to go deep, broke back mountain deep. Then when he comes storming through your offensive line to defend his shamed sheep humping manhood, Burt Reynolds the old pig skin into his shriveled goat aides infected planters nut sack. Then yell Ahman Green fumbles the ball (again) and let the Packers fan's pile on.
4
Just go ahead and carry a knife- my wife this morning forgot her's was in her purse and didn't discover it until AFTER passing through screening...
The flight was delayed and she returned the knife (Kershaw folding full sized) to her car during the wait for the flight.
Sure glad we beefed up security.
Posted by: J Parker at May 11, 2006 06:49 PM (YK5fv)
5
I wish I could point you to my archives. This is an idea I had years ago. I also pointed to an article where Jerusalem rabbis had permitted taking a pig on buses to use the fear of swine shrapnel as a deterrent.
CafePress censored one of my designs for shirts. But this and this design got through.
And I've gone on the counter-offensive on my blog, putting something up until my blog is secured.
Posted by: Aaron's cc: at May 11, 2006 11:26 PM (ov6Vw)
6
How about a pig skin jacket with the "hood" left on, ears and all? With the hood thrown back it would look like an ordinary leather jacket, pull up the hood and no jihadist would want to face PigMan!
Posted by: HD Wanderer at May 12, 2006 07:40 AM (nA9AR)
Personally, I'm not a fan of Chick tracts. They are usually offensive, always simplistic, and often highly innacurate.
Far worse than Chick's idiotic tracts, though, are laws prohibiting their distribution. There is not a single Islamic country on the planet which allows open proselyzing of Muslims. Not. A. Single. One.
So, is it a good thing that some of these Christian tracts were found on windshields in Dubai? Absolutely. Free speech means nothing if idiots aren't allowed to distribute their garbage. And no man is truly free unless he can openly convert from one faith to antoher.
1
At this time, my goal is NOT that Dubai be "truly free". I understand the sentiment - and fundamentally agree - but I've leave that one alone for a later time - we have bigger issues to deal with. These tracts are an unnecessary distraction/provocation. Sorry.
Posted by: hondo at May 11, 2006 11:46 AM (SeBrl)
2
How are CHICK tracts offensive? They are 100% truth. However they need new tracts showing valiant and patriotic Christians slaughtering filthy arab children in this Holy war of the end times.
Posted by: Unashamed Patriot at May 11, 2006 12:10 PM (y+196)
3
Crawl back in your hole you useless piece of human crap!
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 11, 2006 02:07 PM (8e/V4)
5
Hondo,
I have read several phd papers on allah. Most agree allah is one of many gods the Arabs prayed to at one time. Mohammed made the moon god allah the only god to worship, according to the papers I read.
I realize a lot of people do not believe as I do, but I would not cut off someone's head for it, as it appears Islam at this time would. Does the cartoon offend them, or do you just think it is not needed at this time? I am tired of Christians having to wear a card in an Islamic country, or getting killed over Mohammed cartoons.
Islam can have their religion here, or in the West, but in their countries Christians have to stay inside their homes during Ramadan.
So, I guess what I am really trying to say, is to heck with how the enemy is feeling about a cartoon that tells the truth as a lot of people see it.
Posted by: Leatherneck at May 11, 2006 02:17 PM (D2g/j)
6
Dubai ain't the enemy! Fuck the enemy! Dubai has been a friend - OK, so we don't see eye to eye on somethings - so what! You accept that and do right by a friend!
Pick your fights one at a time according to your needs and timetable! That's what victory is - anything else is dumb!
Posted by: hondo at May 11, 2006 02:25 PM (SeBrl)
7
Chick is 100% accurate? Then all Catholics worship statues and are bound for hell.
Posted by: YBP at May 11, 2006 03:03 PM (42Ghj)
8
hondo: Muslims have the right to be offended over cartoons - and because we are "friends" we must recognize and respect their hypersensitivities. And yet, if Christian, we merit no reciprocal respect? This seems like a pretty pathetic "friendship" to me. Call it a strategic alliance, but don't kid yourself by calling it a friendship.
Posted by: Heroic Dreamer at May 11, 2006 03:55 PM (aH6Zf)
9
The fact Allah may have been a moon God in pre-Islamic polytheistic Arabia sounds like those who point out Yahweh was a minor storm god in pre-Abrahamic Hebrew society.
The argument cuts both ways and is in fact not a real serious blow to ones faith.
As far as the Chick pubs go they are full of the usual fundy stuff, in general I find there much theology in those things that is rubbish and some that is good.
As I have said the best preaching is by ones actions.
10
>>>As far as the Chick pubs go they are full of the usual fundy stuff,
Not sure what you mean by "the usual fundie stuff", but even most evangelicals think Chick tracts are way out there. Only hardcore Pentecostal types take that stuff seriously.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at May 11, 2006 08:18 PM (8e/V4)
11
There are good ideas and there are bad ideas. Sometimes people with good ideas mock people with bad ideas by taking their bad ideas to their logical conclusion. And sometimes, very rarely, people have such bad ideas that they are indistinguishable from mockery. Chick tracts embody this badness.
I kid you not. The first time I saw a Chick tract I thought it was a joke. I thought it was the work of some puerile atheist ridiculing Christians. It was only later, after browsing some internet buzz, that I discovered to my horror that this idiot is actually serious. If I were a Christian, I would consider offing this nutcase for setting back the missionary cause 50 years.
Posted by: ShannonKW at May 11, 2006 08:19 PM (dT1MB)
12
That pamphlet is "reality" based I see.
In reality, some guy pulled that in front of some Arab Muslims as shown, they would have beheaded him where he stood and then took his son behind a Palm tree for some group buggery.
Posted by: davec at May 11, 2006 08:46 PM (CcXvt)
13
ShannonKW - point noted and agreed
Heroic Dreamer - you know damn well what I meant. Yeah, your right! So what! Your interested in scoring points - I'm interested in winning - winning isn't everything - it is the only thing!!!!!
Posted by: hondo at May 11, 2006 08:47 PM (SeBrl)
14
hondo - maybe you're right - I'm no expert - the point I'm trying to make is that while I don't think it's wise to walk around intentionally offending I don't see how we win anything by walking on eggshells, ignoring the truth - and the truth is that Muslim countries do not tolerate our freedom of religion. But maybe you're right... placing these little comic strips on windshields in Dubai is like teasing the alligator while still in the middle of the river, and therefore not a good idea.
Posted by: Heroic Dreamer at May 11, 2006 10:40 PM (aH6Zf)
15
It´s good that you can display such tracts can be displayed in Dubai without having your windshield broken. Dubai has one of the highest GDPs per capita so their progress doesn´t really come as a huge surprise.
Posted by: Highroller at May 12, 2006 03:30 AM (2mstS)
16
I love the Chick tracts; they make great toilet reading when you have to pass the time in a gas station restroom.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 12, 2006 06:01 AM (0yYS2)
Posted by: To frustrated hate mongers at May 14, 2006 06:29 AM (CyaU5)
25
Kill those who are not Christian or Jewish:
You must kill those who worship another god. Exodus 22:20
Kill any friends or family that worship a god that is different than your own. Deuteronomy 13:6-10
Kill all the inhabitants of any city where you find people that worship differently than you. Deuteronomy 13:12-16
Kill everyone who has religious views that are different than your own. Deuteronomy 17:2-7
Kill anyone who refuses to listen to a priest. Deuteronomy 17:12-13
Kill any false prophets. Deuteronomy 18:20
Any city that doesnÂ’t receive the followers of Jesus will be destroyed in a manner even more savage than that of Sodom and Gomorrah. Mark 6:11
Jude reminds us that God destroys those who donÂ’t believe in him. Jude 5
Posted by: HAHAHAHAHAHAH at May 14, 2006 06:32 AM (CyaU5)
26
HAHAHAHAHAHAH, you sound like a muslim enabler. Don't you realize the Old Testament ( Holy Q'uaran ) is filled with that sort of kill the infidel rhetoric? If God had a right to wipe out everyone but Noah and his entourage, then why not a village here and there?
God finally gave up trying to purge as He realized everytime he pulled a weed that 3 more would grow in it's place. Realizing His error of judgement, He went into retirement, became a kinder, gentler God and sent Jesus Christ to finish the job ... is it inconceivable that God evolves and grows along with His creation?
Wisdom in a nut-shell.
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 14, 2006 08:42 AM (FCC6c)
27
I concede--IM, you are a master at this. It was laugh out loud funny, too.
Britain Can't Extradite Hijackers
If these men arrived in a stolen plane there should be some criminal law in Britain they could use? Certainly the plane was still hijacked when it arrived in Britain therefore they should be charged. But today they are walking around free.
BBC: The government has said it will appeal against a decision to allow nine Afghan hijackers to stay in Britain because it was unsafe for them to return home.
Home Secretary John Reid said it was important to challenge any ruling which may "appear inexplicable or bizarre to the general public".
A High Court judge ruled the nine, involved in a four-day stand-off at Stansted Airport in 2000, could remain.
Prime Minister Tony Blair had said the ruling was an "abuse of common sense".
In a statement in Downing Street, Mr Reid said: "When decisions are taken which appear inexplicable or bizarre to the general public, it only reinforces the perception that the system is not working to protect or in favour of the vast majority of ordinary decent, hard-working citizens in this country.
"That is a perception that should worry all of us and it is a perception that all of us should be working to put right."
'Abuse of justice'..
..."We can't have a situation in which people, who hijack a plane, we're not able to deport back to their country," Mr Blair said on Wednesday.
"It's not an abuse of justice for us to order their deportation; it's an abuse of common sense...
We feel for you Mr. Blair. This is the second story in two days where terrorists have used British law to provide themselves protection at the expense of the safety of the people of Britain.
1
Abuse of common sense? It would appear to me to be an absolute lack of common sense.
Posted by: memphis761 at May 11, 2006 08:52 AM (D3+20)
2
IT MAKES MY BLOOD BOIL EVERYDAY WERE OUR LEFT WING JUDGES WHO LIVE IN A CUCOON AND DONT SEE THE REAL WORLD MAKE A JUDGEMENT THAT DOES NOT REPRESENT THE OPINION OF THE BRITISH PEOPLE AND THE TAX PAYER. I WORK HARD PAY TAXES ONLY FOR A JUDGE TO ASK ME TO PAY FOR HIM {HIM BEING THE HIJACKERS AND PASSENGERS} AND HIS FAMILY FOR BENIFITS AND HEALTH CARE AND THE COSTS FOR HIS COURT CASE, SOLICITOR AND HIS BRAND NEW ACCOMADATION IN SLOUGH. GRRRR IF THE HUMAN RIGHTS JUDGES WERE AROUND IN WWII THEY WOULD BE HUNG FOR TREASON.
Posted by: DAVE at May 11, 2006 09:43 AM (JmO6f)
3
JC always says that "liberalism is a mental disorder". Everyday his words get proven to be more and more true.
Posted by: Graeme at May 11, 2006 09:59 AM (cbHkp)
4
At least it shows that Nu Labour does have limits when it comes to forcing diversity on Britain.
Posted by: Graeme at May 11, 2006 10:06 AM (cbHkp)
5
Go home and help re-build your new country!!! They had the balls to hijack the plane to escape ... now have the balls to go back and build a new Afhganistan!!!
Posted by: hondo at May 11, 2006 11:52 AM (SeBrl)
6
Liberalism is a mental disorder was coined by Dr. Savage from the Savage nation.
This type of headline makes me sometime think I might be on the loseing side in this war.
Posted by: Leatherneck at May 11, 2006 02:52 PM (D2g/j)
7
You Brits need to grab your pitchforks and head on down to the High Judges' Chamber. And grab a rope too. Time for a hanging.
Posted by: jesusland joe at May 11, 2006 06:42 PM (rUyw4)
Two Iraqi Journalists Found Dead
(Baghdad) Witnesses saw two Iraqi journalists, Laith al-Dulaimi and Muazaz Ahmed Barood, abducted on Sunday southeast of Baghdad. Their bodies were found on Monday.
Al-Dulaimi, a reporter for the privately owned TV station Al-Nahrain, and Muazaz Ahmed Barood, a telephone operator for the station, were kidnapped by men disguised as police officers at Diyala Bridge while driving home to Mada'in, a town 12 miles (19 kilometers) southeast of Baghdad, Abdulkarim al-Mehdawi, the station's general manager told CPJ.
Their bodies were discovered at al-Wihda district, 20 miles (32 kilometers) south of Baghdad. Both men, in their late 20s, were shot in the chest, al-Mehdawi told CPJ.
Al-Dulaimi became a reporter for Al-Nahrain four months ago. Barood worked at the station since it was established just over a year and a half ago. The motive behind the murders is unclear. Al-Mehdawi told CPJ that neither the station nor the journalists had ever received threats.
According to the Committee to Protect Journalists, nearly three-fourths of all journalists killed in Iraq since 2003 have been Iraqis. These were brave men as are all the Iraqis in the journalism profession. In my opinion, evidence indicates that Iraqi journalists are at highest risk of being targeted by the scum murderers infesting the country. Condolences to their families and friends.
1
It's a shame, but it's also too bad the same sort of thing doesn't happen to some of the scumbag liars in our media. I would love to see a video of Dan Rather getting executed in the street.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 11, 2006 08:06 AM (0yYS2)
2
Yes IP the insurgents have killed about 3 or 4 times as many journanlists as have the coalition forces. Here is a link to the Committee to Protect Journalists page about Iraq.http://www.cpj.org/attacks05/mideast05/iraq_05.html Only 13 have been killed by coalition forces
Posted by: john Ryan at May 11, 2006 09:50 AM (TcoRJ)
3
John - you never cease to confuse me - what is your point?
Of the 13 - how many have been "executed" - as opposed to "friendly fire".
I know - friendly fire is a goofy term - but as a soldier I understand it (and alert to it!!!). In a fire fight, I have (and taught) soldiers to "GET DOWN - STAY DOWN - EAT DIRT - KEEP LOW - CRAWL - ETC ETC ETC.
Funny thing - journalists have this rather stange habit of doing just the opposite - kinda dumb if you ask me - opps there goes another journalist!
I am aware of some of the 13 and the circumstances - there are a lot of morbid jokes told about them - in a perverse kind of way - it happens.
Note - the insurgents target journalists - which is why the MSM stays holed up in their safe hotels - and hire Iraqis to do their leg work.
Posted by: hondo at May 11, 2006 12:10 PM (SeBrl)
4
John -
Let's just once agree on something ...
The MSM in Iraq hire Iraqis to do their actual job for them - and take all the risks - which accounts for the hugh discrepancy in killed journalists.
The Post Where *I* Defend Jeff Goldstein's Honor
I've had panic attacks.
For some reason, although I know what's causing it, I swear I'm having a heart attack.
The root cause is my screwed up shoulder and back. If I move a certain way, or do a certain thing, it causes pain in my chest muscles.
Since my left shoulder is a constant source of misery to me, thanks to chronic tendinitis, the combination of of chest pains with left arm pain triggers the attack.
I haven't seen a doctor about it, nor even mentioned it to anybody but my wife until now. Mainly because the first couple of times it happened, I ended up realizing that I really wasn't having a heart attack, and that it was my screwy left shoulder causing the pain.
I still get the pain in the chest, and in the left arm, and the first thought in my head is "heart attack!" Which, of course, causes the heart to start racing. And the brain to start irrationalizing. I must be a mild case, though, I can usually talk myself out of it.
I will always get great mirth out of a group of people who will lambast a Conservative for ingesting a legal substance, be it Klonopin, alcohol, or nicotine, but will defend to the death a meth addict who robs and murders.
Maybe they should be reminded that Liberalism is a mental disorder, and far more people suffer from it than those who have panic attacks.
1
Given the conditions in which we live, the occasional panic attack is just a sign of sanity.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 11, 2006 08:08 AM (0yYS2)
2
Yep, I would expect most bloggers are "high energy people". If you live that hard and productive and have all those irons in the fire it happens. Those who have nothing to do or nothing to loose hardly ever have panic attacks.
Posted by: Howie at May 11, 2006 08:32 AM (D3+20)
3
I can FIX your shoulder, or teach you over the phone how to have your wife fix your shoulder. Power stretching....and I've got the perfect stretch for you. Email me. You'll feel better in 10 minutes. Promise.
Posted by: suemac at May 11, 2006 08:44 AM (1fK6i)
4
Sounds to me like Sue is offering a *tantric* cure (wink wink, nudge nudge, say no more)
5
I thought we were supposed to be beyond looking down on a person because they seek help to maintain mental health. Isn't that what the liberals taught us years ago? Seems there are a bunch of them who missed school that day. Would they make fun of a cripple?
Posted by: Retread at May 11, 2006 10:16 AM (mtsTe)
6
I have a very amusing right knee, which will "pop" if I have it bent in just the wrong way, as happens when I am squatting down. I am invariably left writhing on the ground in agony for a few seconds until the knee corrects its position and the pain stops.
Good for laughs at parties, restaurants, in the office, and especially at home while doing yard work, my trick knee is well-known to my family. So if I do have an actual hear attack, they will see me writhing on the floor and think I'm only showing off my knee again....
Posted by: austin Mike at May 12, 2006 11:06 AM (X2/XB)
7
Ever had any tests for tachycardia? Sometimes it can cause the same sensations of pain.
Posted by: The Babaganoosh at May 12, 2006 06:37 PM (v1W1X)
At the same time, the Americans and the Government were able to absorb our painful blows, sustain them, compensate their losses with new replacements, and follow strategic plans which allowed them in the past few years to take control of Baghdad as well as other areas one after the other. That is why every year is worse than the previous year as far as the MujahidinÂ’s control and influence over Baghdad.
5. The role that the Islamic party and the Islamic Scholars Committee play in numbing the Sunni people through the media is a dangerous role. It has been proven from the course of the events that the American investment in the Party and the Committee were not in vain. In spite of the gravity of the events, they were able to calm down the Sunni people, justify the enemy deeds, and give the enemy the opportunity to do more work without any recourse and supervision.
1
This is really bad news for the leftards, and they will redouble their propaganda efforts to make us surrender.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 11, 2006 08:11 AM (0yYS2)
2
As a "leftard", let me just note that Centcom might not be the most objective observer of conditions on the ground.
As I've pointed out a couple of times, whatever the situation in Iraq, even the government admits things are worsening in Afghanistan.
3
Theo, I don't expect you or any other liberal bedwetter to understand anything about warfare, insurgency, counter-insurgency, guerilla strategies, etc., but I do expect you to piss your pants and try to surrender to every enemy that comes along, if not join them; and you never disappoint.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 16, 2006 04:25 AM (0yYS2)
1
How about a doormat to wipe his feet on, as he departs England?
Posted by: davec at May 10, 2006 06:58 PM (CcXvt)
2
A rolled-up magazine for jamming into someone's adam's apple is always handy.
Posted by: jason at May 10, 2006 07:31 PM (yZ81L)
3
I carry a large umbrella. Useful in England, in crowds, and for keeping distance between you and an armed assailant. A sealed bottle of whiskey is nice, too.
Posted by: See-dubya at May 10, 2006 07:36 PM (ieyQx)
4
How about Last Gasp Larry as a human shield - you can duct tape his mouth shut and dump him when your done with him.
Posted by: hondo at May 10, 2006 07:38 PM (SeBrl)
5
A flask and sensible shoes. Something you can stomp with.
Posted by: Howie at May 10, 2006 07:39 PM (D3+20)
6
Howie, that sounds more like a night out with Rosie O'Donnell, Ellen Degeneres, and Kim Gandy.
hahahaha
Posted by: Vinnie at May 10, 2006 07:48 PM (/qy9A)
7
Almost any kind of ballpoint pen makes an excellent stabbing weapon, you know when you ask Joe MoHamid for his autograph? Hell just ram that pen thru his temple. Ouch!
Or more elegant and high tech, take a laser pointer along for the ride, some look just like a ball point pen, either way they can blind at close range.
Other ideas include porno magazines. Something that distracts our MoHammids like toe jam does to a dog.
Extra socks, then can be stuffed with previously mentioned rolls of quarters. Excellent club.
Hairspray and a lighter. Makes a great torch.
Walking Cane, its allowed and can be used to beat the fleas out of Mr MoHammid's hair.
Posted by: changehappens at May 10, 2006 08:03 PM (hGibF)
8
The cord from headphones can be used to strangle someone, and the plastic knife and fork from the chicken Cordon Bleu hobby kit hurt like hell when stuck into the eyes.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 10, 2006 08:24 PM (0yYS2)
10
A stack of "Mohammid Comix". Brazenly reading these will send the meteor worshippers into a rage and blow their cover. They can then be quickly killed with the guitar strings.
Posted by: Richard at May 10, 2006 09:00 PM (7KF8r)
11
Audio recordings of conflicting, odd instructions in Arabic to confuse and disorient attackers.
Posted by: Heroic Dreamer at May 10, 2006 09:03 PM (aH6Zf)
12
Get a can of soda, and if need be you can tear it apart, and use it as a slicing weapon. Also good to use the sharp edge to cut the seat belt off and use it as a poor man's morning star.
ASW
Posted by: Alpha Sierra Whiskey at May 10, 2006 09:04 PM (A0+Ea)
13
Rusty, condoms might make a handy addition. They are not a dual use item, nor recyclable, but are a must when you travel overseas. If you know what I mean. You never know when you might get lucky.
Posted by: jesusland joe at May 10, 2006 09:22 PM (rUyw4)
Posted by: Vinnie at May 10, 2006 09:33 PM (/qy9A)
15
The roll of quarters is much closer to brass knuckles if you're wearing at least a couple of rings, 4 rings are better though.
Posted by: owlish at May 10, 2006 10:12 PM (JLwmt)
16
Hondo: Maxie owes me two keyboards (or is it three? I lost count) Now you owe me one. That was priceless!
Personally I think Rusty would look smashing in a pair of those shoes at bamapachyderm. Do they come in Oxford Brown to match the belt with the big buckle?
Posted by: Oyster at May 11, 2006 05:38 AM (YudAC)
17
There's a Mrs. Rusty. Who knew? But he might get lucky with her. Ok, ditch the condom.
Posted by: jesusland joe at May 11, 2006 06:00 AM (rUyw4)
18
Personally, I travel a lot. I wear socks, good boots, and listen to a 2nd generation iPod, even though I have a Nano. A stretchy belt is good too. Why?
2nd Gen iPod in a sock is one good weapon, each boot is a good thrown stench bomb. Get 'em gagging, and whack 'em up side the head.The stretchy belt makes for a weak slingshot, or is good for hitting enemies that thought they were out of range...
On a side note: Load a few c130's with vats of bacon grease and a few crop dusting parts and make Muslum countries glisten with a nice coat of grease? I suppose that would violate some kind of ethics barrier wouldn't it? How about a nuke with bacon wrapped around it?
Eh. A little extreeme? How about we inject captured terrorists with bacon grease?
Hm.. No fun. Still unethical.
Darn it.
They better be glad we play nice...
Posted by: corporealthud at May 11, 2006 06:23 AM (rVdFA)
19
Simple get cans of soda from the stew and put them in a pillow case ala Sean Penn in Bad Boys. Or purchase a CIA letter opener, it's a carbon fiber knife that can't be detected by metal detectors. I wore one for many years and even when I got pat down because my boots set of the detector it wasn't found. Guitar strings and two nice steel ball point pens for making handy garrotes, Tube sock with a roll of guarters makes and excellent sap. OK enough for now, I don't wnat any one to think that I've done any planning on this before. OK one last one specifically for Muslim terrorists, a string of pork sausages that you can use as a nunchuck.
Posted by: SPO at May 11, 2006 07:03 AM (OZn2O)
20
"...a string of pork sausages that you can use as a nunchuck."
Wow, great idea, just like a cross works against vampires. I like it. Now I gotta go get some link sausages. To have on hand just in case.
Posted by: jesusland joe at May 11, 2006 09:18 AM (rUyw4)
21
Pork rinds. Paper clips - straighten out to nice shives. Car keys between fingers. Put car rings on one of those coiled rubber keyrings - they stretch out into a nice whip-lash weapon with the keys at the end. If you had as many keys as I, you'd have a serious weapon. ;-) A few quarters or dimes sharpened into fine cutting at the edges - mixed in with other change their virtually undetectable. Ball point pens could always have ink replaced with some nasty concoction and wouldn't be detected - take cap off, stab and enjoy their cries of pain. Or better yet, a fountain pen - inkwell painted black on the inside filled to disguise noxious chems - instant projectile weapon. The possiblities are, unfortunately, are limitless. Terrorists could easily get crap on board.
Posted by: Ansar al-Kufir at May 11, 2006 07:04 PM (y7gpG)
I'm a news junkie, you're a news junkie. I surf MyWay news, Google news, Yahoo news, Fox News, Drudge, and our local news looking for stuff to post on.
And I won't even list the number of blogs I hit each day. Yeesh.
I hadn't heard of this, have you?
Annika makes an interesting observation. This incident happened the week of the United 93 premiere.
4
That some Flight 93 passengers "fought like warrior poets" is encouraging for our future. For surely “we the people” are able (but are we willing?) to recapture the bridge of the ship of state, and seize the helm from postmodernist hijackers. See: www.tell-usa.org/flight93
Any one in London?
I'll be heading to London on Saturday. Last call for any London readers who might want to hang out. E-mail me at contact information above directly.
Spaghetti Eating in Burka: Lady and the Tramp Remix (video)
Jason is on a roll and sets this woman in a full burka eating spaghetti, which we brought to you earlier here, to the appropriate music. Did you think it was funny the first time? This takes the funny up a notch (WARNING: screen spewage alert, drink liquids at safe distance)
1
I like how the one lady tries to go over the top. At least the chick with her back turned had enough sense to go under the burka.
You know it is probably quite convenient to have a napkin strapped right to your face. In fact if you get get these chicks a foam dome they'd be all set. It appears they may be on to something.
Posted by: TexAg03 at May 10, 2006 03:51 PM (3qF8P)
2
that's hilarious. I'd like to see them eating ice cream next.
Posted by: elmers brother at May 11, 2006 11:39 PM (U2MGT)
3
And here at last is all the evidence you will ever need to know why Islam will never dominate the world.
Posted by: Dave at May 12, 2006 09:37 AM (wZLWV)
4
Very funny! It looks like the guy reading the paper is checking them out, too.
Posted by: Little Mickey at May 12, 2006 10:57 AM (7vlGK)
5
It's actually tragic. These poor women! It's humiliating. Away with burkas.
Posted by: Nancy at May 12, 2006 11:32 AM (2gNJ2)
6
The holy Koran says, "Let women be modest, and cover their breasts." And this has devolved into covering all their parts or getting acid thrown on their faces. And who do you imagine decrees this? God? Or the men?
Posted by: Carol Wolf at May 12, 2006 12:22 PM (xnoT9)
7
The comments here are offensive and culturally ignorant. Too bad ladies in burkas can't sue your asses.
Posted by: Ashley at May 12, 2006 01:09 PM (61die)
8
Yes it is too bad they don't have any rights. What a fine point you just made.
Posted by: Howie at May 12, 2006 01:14 PM (D3+20)
9
HA! That is hilarious! Ladies in Berkas, get thee to Southern California and gets a tan!
Posted by: The CarpetMuncher at May 12, 2006 02:06 PM (MoBQw)
10
In traditional countries, they'd eat in an all-women setting with no face veils. Less entertaining, even more oppressive.
Posted by: jb at May 12, 2006 04:54 PM (9omtA)
11
This is one of the funniest videos I have seen...ever. Brilliant.
Posted by: bonethrob at May 12, 2006 08:43 PM (LyYk4)
12
You guys need to get out of your inner Burkas of Ignorance. You probably never seen anyone eating veiled in a Nikaab in public. Nor have people in the muslim world seen patrons walking, unconcerned, buck naked in a locker rooms.When novelty is hilarious,intellect gets disheveled . Getting around a Nikaab,there are a dozen ways. Hats off to them for their ingenuity, who desire to follow the rules as they redeem being the right for them.
Posted by: MZ at May 13, 2006 03:19 AM (BJYNn)
13
Wowww How nice this video, I just ate my spaghetti's dish and I try to took them with an scarf, really difficult my folks.
Posted by: Suetonius at May 15, 2006 07:16 AM (3oTon)
14
I didn't find this hilarious at all...just disturbing. It makes me wonder whether "the rules", obviously made by men, are only followed by women out of fear.
Are these rules "right" for them because they know what their society would do to them if they went without one?
Tchaikovsky's Dance of the Sugar Plumb Mujahidin (Video)
Jason presents his mashed version of this Mujahidin training video set to Tchaikovsky's Dance of the Sugar Plumb Fairies. Kind of puts it in a whole new perspective.
Incidentally, I've seen the Nutcracker at the Bolshoi. Would have been much more interesting had the above Muj played Clara.
UPDATE: Jason tells me his video was posted earlier by Misha.
1
Just so's you know, this was 1st posted over at nicedoggie.net, but I appreciate you spreading it around. It makes me giggle every time I see it!
Jason
11 Year Old Somali Girl Gives Birth in Britain
Echo's of Aisha, Mohammed's 6 year old wife? Muslims defend Mohammed's alleged honor by pointing out that a) Aisha was 9 when Mohammed finally had sex with her, and b) back in Mohammed's day girls matured faster.
Matured faster? Right.
The third option, of course, is just to deny that Mohammed ever did this and claim the hadiths are wrong. Which would solve a lot of problems. Or, maybe Mohammed was just a pedophile, in which case......
A MAN aged 37 has been arrested after an 11-year-old girl gave birth to a baby boy....
The man and the girl are thought to be visitors to the UK from Africa, possibly from Somalia.
The baby was kept at the hospital in a special care unit, and the girl was taken into the care of Hillingdon Borough Council. The man was not held immediately.
However, police arrested him in Uxbridge yesterday and he was questioned about the pregnancy. He was released on bail until July while cops investigate.
1
I don't know about the Arab culture, but in Indian subcontinent, early marriage was a widely practiced affair (even in the mid twentieth century). Girls were married off as early as 6 or 7 usually to a boy of 16-17. This practice did not depend on girl's puberty.
The government had to enact special law to ban early marriages and the ban is also sometimes violated in this century by some superstitious people.
If we were to compare medieval social practices in todays context, yes many Indian Hindu/Muslim/Christian/Buddhists were pedophiles too in earlier days. It doesn't have anything to do with religion.
Posted by: Rezwan at May 11, 2006 03:33 AM (4tUkB)
2
It has plenty to do with religion when it is claimed that Allah willed it that Muhammed should marry Aisha. It has plenty to do with religion when a "prophet's" actions are used to justifiy it in the present. When any action is attributed to a culture or tribal tenet wihtout bringing their God and prophet to bear as justification, it's one thing, but this is an action that is sanctified because their prophet did it. When any cult or sect goes back to a holy book to justify the action - whatever it is - it has plenty to do with religion. When that holy book is accompanied with other texts (ie. the Sunnah) that mandate that others should follow the example, it has plenty to do with religion.
People have been killing each other since the beginning. Sometimes for greed, sometimes for hate, sometimes for love. But would we say that the jihadists killing of the infidel has nothing to do with religion because it's been done by others? Maybe not a perfect analogy, but close enough.
Posted by: Oyster at May 11, 2006 06:10 AM (YudAC)
3
At what age did Joseph marry Mary ? Many believe that the translation of the Hebrew young woman" to be pre 13 years of age. http://www.udayton.edu/mary/questions/faq/faq02.htm lhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary%2C_Mother_of_Jesus#Mary.27s_age Here are a couple of links. Of course everyone always wants to look harshly at the fools who worship the other false religions, but do not like their own examined too closely.
Posted by: john Ryan at May 11, 2006 07:32 AM (TcoRJ)
4
John, as usual you're being an idiot. Mary's age is immaterial to the topic, because it was never mentioned, and isn't used by Christians as an excuse to marry young girls. Stop being stupid if you can possibly help it.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 11, 2006 08:13 AM (0yYS2)
Posted by: sandpiper at May 11, 2006 12:55 PM (stdEd)
6It has plenty to do with religion when it is claimed that Allah willed it that Muhammed should marry Aisha
Surely we are taking much heed to such claims. In the same way we also stereotype the Jihadists ideologies as ideologies of 25% people of the world.
You will see that Muslims brought up in different regions and cultures act and behave differently. It is wrong to think that a Muslim's thought in Afghanistan and a Muslim immigrant's thought in US would be the same. It all depends on the person's education, upbringing, exposure and freedom to define how one takes one's religion.
The real problem is with those Muslims who in the 21st century want to clutch to his religion, and want to define him/herself by the religion. Instead of regarding religion as a pathway with rational reasoning, he/she is more interested in interpretation of a 1500 old text according to his preference.
We need to identify those areas and work towards bringing freedom, democracy and enlightment to these people, not indulging in the discussion of Ayesha's age or the medieval practices. We need to raise our voices against those apologists who support the jihadi ideologies.
"Religion is the idol of the mob; it adores everything it does not understand." -
Posted by: Rezwan at May 12, 2006 02:37 AM (tX8En)
7
Rezwan, I think you're being a little contradictory in your last paragraph. By indulging in this very discussion we are in fact raising our voices against what jihadists fight for and that a glut of others apologize for. Aisha's age and the fact that this behavior is still commonly practiced is but one aspect of the ideology among so many that go against the very fabric of the rest of the world's advancements in the area of human rights.
And you proved my point in regards to those who are brought up in other more advanced cultures. While they may see it as wrong, most do not speak out against it. They are more compelled to keep their head down and their mouth shut and when cornered on the issue they may admit quietly that they would not do such a thing, but will invariably quote the Koran and say others who do are within their rights.
The day we cannot indulge in a discussion about the systemic abuse of children is the day we give up.
Posted by: Oyster at May 12, 2006 05:29 AM (YudAC)
Saudi Teens Sodomize Boy
(Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) Four Muslim youths in their late teens abducted a boy on Sunday and took him to a remote desert location where they raped him. It's not clear how frequently this type of crime occurs, but my guess would be that it happens more often than is reported.
A police source said the youths had found the boy in the company of another boy in the neighborhood.
They stopped their car beside one of the boys and asked him to get in. When he refused to comply, one of the youths pulled out a knife and threatened to stab him. The frightened boy got in and the youth took him to a lonely place away from the town.
According to the report, the suspects allegedly sodomized the victim and recorded the crime on a digital camera.
The perpetrators were arrested at a checkpoint after police sent out an all points bulletin with a description provided by the victim's friend.
Notice how the young followers of the religion of peace were thoughtful enough to record their assault on the boy on video. Maybe they were planning on reliving their demented excitement.
Posted by: Leatherneck at May 10, 2006 01:47 PM (D2g/j)
2
Not more than a few weeks ago a co-worker told me about a friend of his that worked in Saudi Arabia some years ago with a 20-something fair-haired, fair-skinned Brit who was warned to refuse any invite to go camping made by any Saudi males. The poor fellow didn't heed the warning and was found dead (and violated) in the desert some while later.
Posted by: Retread at May 10, 2006 02:06 PM (mtsTe)
3
It's rather ironic what happens to gays in the ummah, considering how many of them are probably closet flamers.
Posted by: MegaTroopX at May 10, 2006 08:00 PM (yT/Rw)
4
I think the average IQ of the people who write on this website is less than 3.
Posted by: jew schmuck at May 11, 2006 04:42 AM (bSOXE)
5
Hey, schmuck, I can see your own IQ has left you bereft of any meaningful thought yourself. Don't project your own shortcomings onto others.
Posted by: Oyster at May 11, 2006 06:18 AM (YudAC)
Posted by: sandpiper at May 11, 2006 07:31 AM (U+eLg)
7
And this kind of thing doesn't happen all over the world every day? Even in -- gasp -- the United States?
And the genius assertion that this happens more often than is reported... wow. Thanks for pointing out the obvious, Dr. Criminologist.
Posted by: smarty jonestown at May 11, 2006 07:57 AM (W1Gbi)
8
And how about the dozens and dozens (does that number even do it justice?) of Catholic priest pedophiliacs repeatedly molesting young children? Would you mock Catholicism for this?
Or would you rationally point out that it's a tragic situation that is not representative of the Church as a whole.
Posted by: smarty jonestown at May 11, 2006 08:02 AM (W1Gbi)
9
I love how the leftards always come out to defend the actions of their pets when they're caught in some heinous act. Liberals must all be killed.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at May 11, 2006 08:15 AM (0yYS2)
10
Smarty, you don't understand how things work here. When Muslims do bad things, it is because of their religion, not because of history, economics, human nature, globalization, or colonialism. When bad things happen here, it is because of LIBERALS. (in fact, many Catholic conservatives blame the priest scandal on liberals in the church) If you keep that simple mantra in mind, the posts here make perfect sense.
Posted by: jd at May 11, 2006 08:22 AM (aqTJB)
11"Would you mock Catholicism for this?"
Smarty: I guess you missed the part where the church condemns this and just because you weren't here to gauge reactions on this particular blog does not mean that any of us didn't have strong feelings about it. In fact the church was ridiculed and condemned for turning a blind eye to it.
Sorry to disappoint you.
Posted by: Oyster at May 11, 2006 12:17 PM (+tpTD)
12
But his point is that if we use the kidnapping and sodomization of a boy as a cudgel against Islam, as if somehow this was okay under Islam, or that violent non-consensual sex was the fault of their religion, than why doesn't the same logic apply to Christianity? I actually think it likely (although I haven't studied the question) that there is more violent gay sex in Islamic countries than here, not because of the Koran specifically, but because any system that teaches hatred and abhorrence of the sex drive will not conquer it, but redirect it in unhealthy ways. This is why there are many more gay bathhouses, escort services, and strip clubs in Texas per capita than in Massachusetts.
But to imagine that child rape is characteristic of Islam is to engage in a fantasy where our putative enemies are so evil that any actions against them is morally justified.
Posted by: jd at May 11, 2006 12:49 PM (aqTJB)
13
jd,
Your analogy of Muslims, and Liberals on this blog is extreme, and not correct. There are some parallels, and more than a few posts have shed some light on that subject.
Posted by: Leatherneck at May 11, 2006 07:59 PM (D2g/j)
14
Get real, jd.
RE: your comment at May 11, 2006 08:22 AM
Your simplistic and generalized characterization is unwarranted. Frankly, you seem to have a problem with everyone here - not just those who may deserve it. There isn't one person who comments here regularly that you haven't tried to prove wrong or argued with. You have a point about this particular subject, but I'll lay odds against you being be right all the time as you seem to think you are.
In fact the subjects of discussion here are often problems that arise out of extreme liberalism and leftist ideology. That's partly what this blog is about. If you don't like it, and if some still aren't seeing things your way, maybe you're wasting your time here.
Occasionally you remain silent on an issue and only pipe in when you're in disagreement. By this measure we can only guess that either you agree when you're quiet or that the subject just isn't on your radar. So when the only time we hear from you the message is negative, we are left with a negative feeling about your motives for being here at all. That's the feeling I get. Regardless of your motives, that's the impression you leave behind. Surely there has been something, anything, you can agree with here over this time you've been hanging around, but one would never guess it by your actions.
Perhaps you could learn a lesson in human nature as well. Keep coming at someone with an air of censure and soon enough you'll be rejected out of hand whether you're right or wrong. I've reached the point where I'm inclined to just skip your comments, but I'm always amazed at your ability to be so hypercritical.
Posted by: Oyster at May 12, 2006 06:11 AM (YudAC)
15
Oyster--I pipe in when I have something to say. I've agreed with some of the things I read here, and I think I've said so. I do think there is a lot of anti-Muslim prejudice on this site. Some people pass around hysterical falsehoods against Islam, some of which date back to the 14th century (old lies are not more true by age, but simply musty libels, much like anti-Semitic ones).
I don't think I'm always right. I frequently make mistakes. In fact, I think on another post here, Leatherneck, through a link, taught me about the nature of John Adams' unitarianism, and I promptly posted "I was wrong." I don't see enough of that here, or many other places on the blogsphere. It seems people are unable to learn from anyone but their ideological soulmates, and they are also unable to concede error, even on comparatively minor points.
I've also praised posts by John Ryan and others. And in fact, I think I wrote in once to call a post of yours "smartest thing I've read here in weeks". We can presume that I was including my own posts in that category. If that's hypercritical...I wonder what you'd call praise.
Posted by: jd at May 12, 2006 08:12 AM (aqTJB)
16
jd - If I've been guilty of hysterical falsehoods, I'd appreciate you telling me what they are.
17
By JD:
This is why there are many more gay bathhouses, escort services, and strip clubs in Texas per capita than in Massachusetts.
Me:
What?! That is so not true....cuz if it was the Gay Marriage would be allowed in Texas....Massachusetts is made up of gay people so thats why its allowed there.
I doubt that Gay Sex(gay rape) is supported in the Koran. These teens seem to be Pedofiles, or are "in the closet", so they'd figure kidnap a little boy, rape him and leave him......
Posted by: Kouga at May 12, 2006 05:16 PM (XC0E0)
18
Hi Kouga,
I agree on the Koran. Here's the anecdotal source on TX/MA. Turns out gay bathhouses are illegal in Mass, but legal and common in TX. When I travel to TX, I see a lot more titty bars than I do in Mass, as well. Massachusetts is not the den of sin you seem to imagine it. Ted Kennedy is just one man....he can't support an entire industry (and of course, he doesn't have to...)
****
If you think Massachusetts is permissive, you've been spending too much time in Provincetown. You need to get out and see the rest of the state. Massachusetts is socially tolerant, but certainly not permissive. Let me give you a couple of examples. Let a straight man try to find a "tittie bar" here. They are few and far between. Boston has spent the better part of two decades closing down all but a couple of holdouts, and they are constantly harrassed. Texas, by the way seems to have a "tittie bar" or a suggestive ad for one on every street corner. Let a visiting gay man try to find a bath house. There are none in the state. They are illegal. The closest are 45 miles away in Rhode Island (the parking lots are full of Mass plates). Texas has gay bath houses in every major city. Want a drink? Better get to the bar before 1am. It goes on and on. Tolerant? Yes. Permissive? Definitely not.
Terrorists Confess to Beheading Schoolgirls
(Jakarta, Indonesia) Many people may recall last October's barbaric beheadings of three Christian schoolgirls in Indonesia. Well, here's the latest news on the case.
Seven suspected Islamic terrorists have confessed to beheading three Christian schoolgirls on Indonesia's Sulawesi Island, police said Wednesday.
The seven detained suspects confessed under questioning that they planned and carried out the Oct. 29 beheadings in the Central Sulawesi town of Poso, police chief Adj. Sr. Comr. Rudi Sufahriadi told The Associated Press.
Another girl was wounded but spared by the assailants, he said.
Two of the suspects also say they have ties to Noordin Top, regarded as a key leader of the al-Qaeda-linked group Jamaah Islamiyah (JI), according to Central Sulawesi police chief Brig. Gen. Oegroseno.
The girls were killed only because they were Christians. It's beyond me how anyone could assert that Islam and Christianity are not at war when attacks of this nature frequently occur. Maybe most Christians want to deny there is a war with Islam, but many Muslims appear to have a murderously different opinion.
Let's hope that the murdering criminals are treated harshly but, if history is an indicator, they likely won't be. Indonesia is a Muslim nation and it has customarily given jihadists insultingly lenient punishment.
Good News/Bad News From Egypt.
Egypt is on the front burner today. The nation suffers from al-Qaeda inspired terror and is fighting hard. ThatÂ’s a good thing. WAPO :
ROME — One day after police killed a man described as the mastermind of an attack last month at the seaside town of Dahab, Egyptian authorities claimed to have all but broken up a group that bombed several Red Sea resorts.
The bad thing is that Egypt has also jailed several bloggers and Democracy activists. Between a rock and a hard place I reckon. Increased democracy may allow a crack for the Islamists to gain more power. However, jailing pro democracy non-terrorist bloggers is not the answer. Big Pharaoh reports the response in support of the bloggers has been good. Keep up the pressure people.
Big Pharaoh :Just got information that the Egyptian embassy in DC was bombarded with e-mails demanding the release of Alaa and the others. Good job.
Update: There is a blog dedicated to Alaa and the others who were detained during the demonstration on May 7th. As I stated before, the Egyptian embassy in DC got bombared by emails from concerned average Americans. We are also suggesting you to contact David Welch, Assistant Secertary and head of the State DepartmentÂ’s Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs. His email is: nea-ela@state.gov
Well, 2 years ago I was told that a blog was just something you use to write stuff in and pray that people might be kind enough to spend 1 or 2 minutes reading your rantings.
Egyptian government and US state department!! That's not what I had in mind 2 years ago!
Egyptian Mufti Takes Page From Taliban Playbook.
When the Taliban first blew up the statue of Buddha in Afghanistan I thought, “These people are going to be a problem. Now in Egypt the rise of the Islamists in politics threatens that nation’s deep heritage.
BBC : A religious ruling condemning the display of statues has angered Egyptian liberals and intellectuals who fear it could encourage religious zealots to attack the country's pharaonic heritage.
the ruling was issued by the Mufti, the most senior religious scholar in Egypt.
Islam has always been wary of representations of the human figure.
Anything which could even remotely suggest idolatry is frowned upon.
But sculpture in Egypt is as old as the pharaohs.