February 09, 2006
A Sense Of Humor Helps
Things that make me go DUH!
From WebMD:
Getting older is the main risk factor for Alzheimer's disease.
I've also heard it's a risk factor for wrinkles, gray hair, and saggy things. But that hasn't been proven yet.
From Yahoo! News:
Health Tip: There's No Cure for Alzheimer's
Please, change your name to Yahoo! Olds, if you're not going to, ya know, post actual news.
Oh, and then there was this comment left on my home blog:
"LOL at your mom and her shitty brain"
I didn't have the heart to tell the poor sob that even now, my mother could kick his ass and make him like it.
Posted by: Vinnie at
05:55 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 119 words, total size 1 kb.
1
My first reaction to Mr LOL would be to want to reduce him to a puddle of hair, guts, and eyeballs but if there is karmic justice in the world(and I believe there is)there is a bus out there waiting for him to step off of the curb.
Posted by: Dadzilla at February 09, 2006 10:39 PM (ofjte)
2
The level some would stoop to is just astounding.
Posted by: Oyster at February 10, 2006 05:13 AM (YudAC)
3
That jerk wasn't stooping. It was workin' its way up!
Posted by: forest hunter at February 10, 2006 09:15 PM (Fq6zR)
4
You can't be 57775 serious?!?
Posted by: Max Ballstein at June 22, 2006 09:03 PM (wOAGc)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Muslims Demand Prophet Muhammed Sex Doll Ban

Image right from the Ann Summers adult store of the 'Mustafa' inflatable 'shag' doll. Muslims are upset because the Prophet Muhammed (swt) is often given the title
al-Mustafa--or, the chosen one.
Apparently there is a large demand for Arabic looking sex dolls with seven inches of love in London at so-called 'hen parties'--the female equivalent of 'stag parties' or bachelor parties. For her part, the proprieter says she was unaware that Mustafa was a name given to the Prophet Muhammed (swt), and only seems to have used the name to make here mustached sex doll seem more Arabic. She claims she will happily change the name.
The Sun:
But the Muslim Association — based at Manchester’s Central Mosque and Islamic Cultural Centre — branded him “obnoxious”.
Yesterday a spokesman said: “This is the name of our Prophet and it’s very upsetting. This thing should be banned.”
In a letter to the store, the Association said: “You have no idea how much hurt, anguish and disgust this obnoxious phrase has caused to Muslims. We are asking you to have our Most Revered Prophet’s name ‘Mustafa’ and the afflicted word ‘shag’ removed.”
First they came for your Muhammed cartoons, and you did nothing. Next they came for your Muhammed sex dolls.....
Mac at In the Bullpen has more.
UPDATE: If Muhammed was al-Mustafa--the chosen one--then what the hell what Eddie Murphy?
Posted by: Rusty at
05:07 PM
| Comments (28)
| Add Comment
Post contains 242 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Banned? That's it?
Hey, IÂ’ve been reading up on this stuff for quite some time and IÂ’m pretty sure this is grounds for beheading.
Posted by: Brad at February 09, 2006 05:23 PM (3OPZt)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 09, 2006 05:24 PM (0yYS2)
3
Those Euros are really into some weird stuff! Maybe the muslims should forget about bannings, boycotts, or beheading - and tell these Euros to get some therepy!
Posted by: hondo at February 09, 2006 05:28 PM (3aakz)
4
There was a character named "Mustafa" in the Dirty Harry movies.
So...will they fatwa Dirty Harry Callahan?
Posted by: Vinnie at February 09, 2006 06:01 PM (f289O)
5
The below link details the shuttting down of a shop in the Ras Al Khaimah (one of the seven Emirates in the United Arab Emirates) that used inflatables as a prostitute!
http://secretdubai.blogspot.com/2006/02/hello-dolly.html
Posted by: Marcus Aurelius at February 09, 2006 06:05 PM (zdcna)
6
Should'nt they be proud of 7" worth being named after their misgyonist? A harem of 30(?) women and a 9 year old main wife.
Just gotta admire those prophets.
Posted by: KurtP at February 09, 2006 06:24 PM (BkiKe)
7
Eddie Murphy is a guy that likes tranvestite prostitues. Also there was a mustafa in the Lion King. LOL
Posted by: Max at February 09, 2006 06:40 PM (5E0ex)
8
At this rate, journalists can start making up a form letter to save time:
Today, members of *insert islamic lobby group name here* said that they were offended by *insert perceived offense here* and called for *insert government department here* to ban *insert perceived offense here* out of respect for the world's muslims. The spokesman of *insert islamic lobby group name here* says that this is one more sign of the growing islamophobia facing muslims in *insert country name here* and urged understanding and respect between all religions.
Posted by: Graeme at February 09, 2006 06:56 PM (FB00D)
9
I had no idea Arabic inches were only one tenth of American inches.
Posted by: JohnJ at February 09, 2006 07:35 PM (o+bjE)
10
They're just mad it's not a blow-up doll of a nine-year-old girl.
Posted by: Insomniac at February 09, 2006 07:47 PM (wZLWV)
11
If they do make a kiddie doll, greg'll be the first to get one, but probably only if it's of a little boy, since he's not into girls.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 09, 2006 08:50 PM (0yYS2)
12
LOL!
Might be a good theme for the caption contest!
Posted by: jonny at February 10, 2006 12:40 AM (nytWC)
13
Did anyone read that book - "stop in the desert" by Mustafa Crap.
Posted by: jonny at February 10, 2006 12:42 AM (nytWC)
14
Well first of all, some Muslim likely went into the shop to find this thing. What's their excuse?
"Me and Abu went to the sex shop just to make sure they weren't doing anything to offend us." ??
Posted by: Oyster at February 10, 2006 05:22 AM (YudAC)
15
LOL!
It's getting funnier everyday...
- Max
Posted by: Max at February 10, 2006 07:44 AM (WM45z)
16
I read recently that the largest per capita consumers of boner pills are men living in the KSA!
At least with the dolls you don't have to go fix snacks when he is done only to come back and find out he is already asleep!
Posted by: Babs at February 10, 2006 08:44 AM (iZZlp)
17
Yep, Max, you just can't make this stuff up. When you think these muslims can't get any crazier, they go and show you that yes, they can. What a religion! Where's the moon god?
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 10, 2006 10:22 AM (rUyw4)
18
That's right JJ. I don't know if you got an equivalent proverb in English, but in French we say: "Une chance que le ridicule ne tue pas." Free translation: Some people are lucky that ridiculiousness doesn't kill.
- Max
Posted by: Max at February 10, 2006 11:19 AM (+kFf8)
19
Max, the equivalent here is:
"Too bad stupidity isn't a terminal disease."
Posted by: Oyster at February 10, 2006 11:39 AM (YudAC)
20
You're biggotry is disgusting. Oooh I bet you're white.
Posted by: Fuck you bigot. at February 10, 2006 11:24 PM (eiKli)
21
"You're biggotry is disgusting. Oooh I bet you're white."
Your spelling is disgusting. And I bet you don't see the irony in your comment.
Posted by: Rich at February 11, 2006 01:10 AM (djcTC)
22
This is just more nonsense, they call their own sons mohammed and mustafa, those islamic warriors that forcefully spread islam across the middle east and India, and africa, they held this name whilst they raped women, and tortured their husbands unless they converted...why were those people not opposed against then, yet a doll embarrasses Mohammed more.
Mohammed was not the prophet of god, he just copied the religions that were most prosperous to gain his own power. He was illiterate, why would god send a man that can not even verify his own words? this makes no sense for someone as wise as god. Mohammed was a business man, an Alan Sugar, who desired power just like all business men and did what ever he had to do get it.
over 20 women, wives and sex slaves he kept.
Bukhari one of Muslims most respected Islamic scriptures tells us he took a 9 year old girls virginity, he took his adopted sons wife, his best friends daughter, and even his own first cousin, such was the hornieness in his personality, Cicrcumcision ensures optimum performance, and muslim women are encouraged to shave just like in american porn films so
if anything Mohammed is the perfect Sex doll..
he had nothing to do with god...just used his name for his own personal desires that is all
Posted by: Disciple at March 06, 2006 04:52 PM (zwOSl)
23
Also devious muslim man "your best friend" says you are Christian only because your parents are.
But what Devious mohammadin man, (history records this as Cheating Arab, a timeless truth) doesnt mention is that he mutilates with great delight his sons genitals to scarr the parents vicious religion upon the child..so maybe that why child muslim.
Devious muslim man also doesnt mention how he allows his sons to marry Christian/Jewish women, but not his daughters too. again this goes to the child taking the parents religion in islamic thought so why "your best friend" so devious, who teaches him such lies and deceit
Bukhari:V4B52N270 “Allah’s Messenger said, ‘Who is ready to kill Ashraf? He has said injurious things about Allah and His Apostle.’ Maslama got up saying, ‘Would you like me to kill him?’ The Prophet proclaimed, ‘Yes.’ Maslama said, ‘Then allow me to lie so that I will be able to deceive him.’ Muhammad said, ‘You may do so.’”
here we see the truth, where Mohammaned the power hungry maniac endorses lying, and please do not tell me god is so bad like Mohammed that he condones it. Also see how he winds up others for his own protection. God was just a mechanism for his own glorification.
Science makes a fool out of islam!!! Inbreeding is rife in their backwards societies yet science tells us how dangerous it is for the offspring of two first cousins having children. But muslims ignore gods warning like god is a joke. Muslim man only thinks of lust like mohammed did when he took his first cousin.
How can anyone say that a sex doll isnt appropriate, after all muslims always say that you can have many wives as long as you are equal to all, and if Moham really was he must have been made out of plastic if you knwo what i mean ;-)
Vicious and ruthless in his quest for domination of land yet always made time to take what he wanted if you know what i mean!!
Posted by: Disciple at March 06, 2006 05:20 PM (zwOSl)
24
www.prophetofdoom.net
This will tell you more about Mohammed and his perverted teachings. one has to wonder if he was sent by the devil trying to tarnish gods name!
at the very least it gives you another side of the coin to what Mohammeds footsoldiers will give you.
Posted by: prophetofdoom at March 11, 2006 03:16 PM (zwOSl)
25
It is strange how many people claim be educated, yet they don't anything about islam except from few source that have their own agenda. Should it you do some research to enlighten yourself and then make your own conclusion. Read from different source; not those that just fell within your comfort zone.
you can start here
http://mohammad.islamway.com/
Posted by: David at March 15, 2006 05:28 PM (psSJm)
26
It is strange how many people claim be educated, yet they don't anything about islam except from few source that have their own agenda. Should it you do some research to enlighten yourself and then make your own conclusion. Read from different source; not those that just fell within your comfort zone.
you can start here
http://mohammad.islamway.com/
Posted by: truthflash at March 15, 2006 05:31 PM (psSJm)
27
If a muslim will only advertise what he wants to about his religion i.e has his agenda, then to counter balance this you must also learn from sites that havbe their agendas. yon and yang.
Why do the muslims when trying to convert a woman not tell them about the strict rules until later. tell them how they are too dirty to enter Mohammeds mosque whilst they have preiods, and tell them how husbands can through islamic scriptures beat the wife. and choose her friends for her etc etc, why do you not be honest and mention these things at the same time as talking of your religion of peace.....
well one reason...deviousness!! deceit...as long as Islam grows the victims ability to make a rational choice is irrelevant. (proven by circumcising young boys before an age that they can become strong enough to fight back or run.
It is muslims that tell us of these vicious ways. Muslims women trying to escape, muslim men crying for infidel blood whilst quoting the Quran. This is not western propoganda, this is Quranic truths...
Posted by: prophetofdoom at March 16, 2006 03:23 PM (zwOSl)
28
If a muslim will only advertise what he wants to about his religion i.e has his agenda, then to counter balance this you must also learn from sites that have their agendas. yon and yang.
Why do the muslims when trying to convert a woman not tell them about the strict rules until later. tell them how they are too dirty to enter Mohammeds mosque whilst they have preiods, and tell them how husbands can through islamic scriptures beat the wife. and choose her friends for her etc etc, why do you not be honest and mention these things at the same time as talking of your religion of peace.....
well one reason...deviousness!! deceit...as long as Islam grows the victims ability to make a rational choice is irrelevant. (proven by circumcising young boys before an age that they can become strong enough to fight back or run.
It is muslims that tell us of these vicious ways. Muslims women trying to escape, muslim men crying for infidel blood whilst quoting the Quran. This is not western propoganda, this is Quranic truths...
Posted by: prophetofdoom at March 16, 2006 03:24 PM (zwOSl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Third Jill Carroll Hostage Video

A new video has appeared on a private Kuwaiti television station of American hostage Jill Carroll. This is the third video released of Jill Carroll. The Kuwaiti TV station did not play the full video and did not release copies of a note which is said to have accompanied the video.
The segment of the video aired can bee seen here (right side). In the video, Jill Carroll does not appear to be in distress. In fact, of the dozens of hostage videos I've seen, this is the first time where the hostage actually seems completely fine. However, only a portion of the tape has been released to the public so we don't know what else is on it. (Hat tip to Tim at OpinionBug for link)
Oddly, this is the first time a hostage video has been delivered to any one other than al Jazeera. Also, several deadlines have past since Jill Carroll's hostage takers threatened to murder her. Perhaps these are good signs that her captors are only after money and not like the hardcore jihadis who have murdered hostages in the past? We pray for Jill Carroll's immediate release.
For more information about Jill Carroll and the previous hostage videos click here.
Reuters:
An American journalist being held hostage in Iraq appeared in a new video tape aired on a private Kuwaiti TV station on Thursday appealing for help in securing her release.
Jill Carroll, 28, was wearing a headscarf and appeared in good health in the brief video aired by Al Rai TV.
"I'm here with the mujahideen. I sent you a letter written by hand. I'm here, I'm fine. Please just do whatever they want," she said. "Give them whatever they want as quickly as possible. There is very short time. Please move fast."
She said the video had been recorded on February 2, but did not say what was in the letter that the TV station received along with the tape.
Jassem Boodai, the chairman of Al Rai TV, told Reuters that the station did not plan to broadcast the contents of the letter. "Because of the sensitive matters mentioned in it, we handed it over to Kuwaiti authorities," he said.
Posted by: Rusty at
04:02 PM
| Comments (22)
| Add Comment
Post contains 376 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I would say those savages need to be shot
Posted by: mynewsbot at February 09, 2006 04:59 PM (5IAeC)
Posted by: hondo at February 09, 2006 05:07 PM (3aakz)
Posted by: Rusty at February 09, 2006 05:13 PM (JQjhA)
4
This is looking more and more like she's a willing participant rather than a hostage. I have been suspicious from the start, but we'll see.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 09, 2006 05:25 PM (0yYS2)
5
Again - it that all there is?
It sounds weird - more like the kiddnappers are more desperate than she - alright - I'll say it - What the hell is going on here?
Posted by: hondo at February 09, 2006 05:43 PM (3aakz)
6
>>> "I'm here with the mujahideen. I sent you a letter written by hand. I'm here, I'm fine. Please just do whatever they want," she said. "Give them whatever they want as quickly as possible. There is very short time. Please move fast."
That sounds so vague it's very suspicious. The big floral background also seems a very out of place in a hostage video meant to instill fear. Could it be that (I'm assuming that she really was taken hostage since her translator was killed) she's been secretly free for some time and is now faking captivity as part of the anti-war effort?
Posted by: Graeme at February 09, 2006 06:09 PM (FB00D)
7
I doubt she's a willing participant. That's just ridiculous. She was crying her eyes out at the last tape. What do you want her to do? Beg for mercy. She knows the United States isn't going to release the prisoners. She's trying to be brave in a dangerous situation. Crying isn't going to make it better. She knows these bastards don't care about women and will kill her at any time.
Posted by: Robert Savage at February 09, 2006 06:10 PM (5E0ex)
8
Grame it's not unusual for for a hostage to be forced to write a letter to the negotiators. Many hostages that are held for ransom do it. If you had a gun to your head and were told to do something, you would do it. Just like when Roy Hallums had a gun to his head and said Bush put him in this hellhole. The terrorists are getting desperate. They know the media is fighting for one of their own. As I said Jill is making the best of a bad situation. She cried her eyes out at the last video and those were not fake tears. Give Jill some dignity. I'm praying for her and I hope she lives. Saying she might have faked her own kidnapping is crazy. Thank you for your time. God bless
Posted by: savageG@msn.com at February 09, 2006 06:16 PM (5E0ex)
9
I'm here with the mujahideen??????
I mean - loosely translated it means warriors/struggle - or say resistance fighters
That's a very generic term isn't it. Didn't this group have it's own moniker when this all started? It that part of the world your "Name" has some signaficant meaning - a statement in itself.
What the hell is going on here????
Posted by: hondo at February 09, 2006 06:27 PM (3aakz)
10
Robert I was merely speculating. It is not my intent to be disrespectful to her or her family. Just like a detective does not have the intention of being disrespectful towards the parents of a missing child when he asks if the child may have run away from home. Based on the evidence presented in Rusty's post I was putting forward a theory. That's all.
Posted by: Graeme at February 09, 2006 06:30 PM (FB00D)
11
All the insurgents call themselves mujahideen. They consider themselves freedom fighters. I don't know why you are jumping the gun. Also the floral background is not unusual. Two Iraqis were sitting in front of a floral background before they were beheaded. They don't want the viewer to know they are in a residential home I guess. Calm down Hondo. The woman's life is in great jeopardy. I don't want the woman to die. My guess is the kidnappers are after money.
Posted by: Robert at February 09, 2006 06:32 PM (5E0ex)
12
Sorry Hondo. It's just I'm a little sensitive when It comes to hostages. These people fear for their lives. They never know when they will die. I feel for Jill. She's a good person who was trying to inform us of Iraq's progress. She's just doing what her captors want her to do. Seeing her cry on video disturbed me. These bastards have no respect for women. And they say they care about Iraqi woman. Sorry for my temper. God bless
Robert
Posted by: Robert at February 09, 2006 06:36 PM (5E0ex)
13
Robert
Understood. I was just thrown a bit by the vague moniker (I am aware of its usage and full meaning) under the circumstances. I am aware also the names choosen in that culture do in fact have significant meaning to them and others, and identifies the various groups from one another. From my perspective - it is odd.
Posted by: hondo at February 09, 2006 07:32 PM (3aakz)
14
mu-jihad-in
The prefix "mu-" means "person who does [x]" and functions like the suffix "-man" in English words like repairman and radioman. Attached to the root "jihad" it means "person who does jihad." The suffix "-in" makes it plural.
Notice that the the word "muslem" is derived the same way from the root "slm" meaning "to submit," hence Muslem literally means "submissive person." (That's their story anyway.) It is left vague, but in context the speaker implies submission to God. What few people appreciate is that "jihad" (lit. "striving") is equally vague. When someone calls himself a mujihad he likewise implies that he is striving to enact God's will, although he only really called himself "one who is striving."
The upshot of all this is that Carroll's captors believe they are being extra pious by keeping her in the back rooms of the house to be fussed over by the family females (which is probably where she got the scarf.) She's flattering them by calling them mujihadin, which is a wise thing to do for someone in her position. Real zealous Muslims don't hang around with women to socialize. Maybe she's getting sex (whether or not she wants it) but apart from that I'd bet she's probably not seeing much of the bad guys lately and has been adopted by the womenfolk.
Posted by: ShannonKW at February 09, 2006 07:56 PM (dT1MB)
15
I agree it sounds suspicious. "Please move fast"??? It just doesn't sound like she's all that desperate. I guess it wouldn't be out of the question for someone sympathetic to muslims' self-imposed plight in the world, to allow herself to be used for muslim political gain. That really would not surprise me at all if that were the case here.
Posted by: Richard at February 09, 2006 08:40 PM (W8EsU)
16
I don't care what anyone says, she looks like she's warming to her role now.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 09, 2006 08:50 PM (0yYS2)
17
Certainly, Jill is not "faking" her own kidnapping. As for the stilted and strange speech, I think that she was probably told exactly what to say.
Posted by: JMS at February 10, 2006 03:30 PM (/ph3F)
Posted by: Robert at February 10, 2006 05:03 PM (5E0ex)
19
I'm wondering if her execution will be televised? It is clear she won't be given the slip, she knows too much, she could trace her whereabouts very easily. Her kidnappers have nothing really to gain by releasing her. They want to offend the US and her citizens and it is clear from all the publicity that her execution will be felt throughout the world.
Sure, she's reporting on the pain and suffering of the Iraqis but remember she's making lots of money off of it too. She is making money off their suffering or she wouldn't be there. She wears a head scarf that is easily put on, a fake head scarf as it were. It is nothing more than a costume. She is pretending to be who she is not. There are risks associated with the job and these were weighed by her decision to stay.
I suppose that following her execution the fees paid to freelancers will increase some to keep them at ground zero.
Posted by: Ray Chavez at February 17, 2006 09:33 PM (UQQOR)
20
To Ray Chavez, I'd like to know how you think she is making "lots of money". You have no idea. These journalists barely scrape by and have to pay for everything ( translators, photographers, drivers etc.) themselves when they are independants. The only reason she is there is to tell the truth about this awful war. If she and others are "making so much money" as you say, then go over there and do it yourself before you pass judgement on them.
Posted by: whoever at February 22, 2006 01:48 PM (vP0TL)
21
I very much wish to see Ms. Carroll freed unharmed, but think we need to put this in perspective. Each year about 800,000 people, 80% of whom are female, become victims of human trafficking. It is believed that about 70% of these people are forced into the sex industry while the rest end up as forced labor in sweat shops or on farms. Those who won't "perform" are often killed or abandoned. It is well documented that Ms. Carroll knew the risks of her profession and chose to remain in Iraq. These other victims, many of whom are very poor, young, or naieve, often have little or no choice and must endure their hellish existence alone and forgotten. Where is the outrage or media coverage for these other victims while there is always so much focus on young, white, middle-class victims like Jill Carroll, Laci Petterson and Natalee Holloway? Not to minimize the suffering of these latter three, but shouldn't we try to help all women in distress?
Shameful.
Posted by: Mogman at February 23, 2006 10:57 AM (3aCNQ)
22
I re-read my last posting and realized it sounds pretty sanctimonious. I apologize for the tone but not the content.
Posted by: Mogman at February 23, 2006 12:26 PM (3aCNQ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Abu Ghraib and Cartoon Jihad
Ladies and gentleman, I am proud to call Dr. Leopold Stotch a
good friend:
there are many people in America and elsewhere in the West are making statements about how the media should self-censor and not publish the Danish cartoons that have sparked several days of Muslim rioting. ThatÂ’s fine, and their argument isnÂ’t completely without merit.
However, it seems to me that these same people are precisely those who said that censoring the Abu Ghraib prison photos would be an unacceptable restriction on freedom of speech and a betrayal of the mediaÂ’s allegiance to the truth.
Posted by: Rusty at
02:08 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 106 words, total size 1 kb.
1
All these comparisons revealing hypocrisy are pretty much the same. If there's any sensitivity their not posting because they care about Muslims but because they fear Muslims. In bigger part tho, it goes against their liberal/Leftist ideology. Muslims, those making the noise, already have a disposition against America and our traditional values. The Left has allied itself with their disposition. Of course Christian and Jew bashing and freedom of the press will remain.
Posted by: Javapuke at February 09, 2006 02:32 PM (2lWdb)
2
The battle lines have been drawn and are obvious to most of us.
Posted by: Chief RZ at February 09, 2006 03:14 PM (MgfPv)
3
Thats a pretty darned good point from Dr. Stoch.
Posted by: Jane at February 09, 2006 03:24 PM (wZLWV)
4
What is missed here in all the confusion is that the cartoons were part and parcel to a valid news story. The story was about self-censorship being practiced by news organizations because of fear of radical Muslims. The newpaper commissioned the illustations to see if cartoonists would be willing to draw cartoons of Mohammed, risking the ire of Muslims. You have all seen the results. The story itself is coming true.
The reaction of the West should have been full support of the cartoonists. When Western governments and even Bush criticized the publication of what was and is a valid story, the reaction was seen as more weakness. Had the reaction been strong and forceful, this situation would have already calmed down. But now the radicals see that violence and protests work, so what do you think they will do now? Exactly, every time these people want something, no matter how unreasonable it is, they will resort to violence, because the West has rewarded violence.
By encouraging violence and protest, the West, including the US, has gone way down the appeasement road. You know what happened with Hitler. A world war with tens of millions killed was the result, and we seem hellbent on having another.
Oh, yeah, just as an aside, illustations of Mohammed have been around for hundreds of years, including the cartoons in question recently published in an Egyptian newspaper and other images sold in Iran. Muslims lie if they say that images of Mohammed are forbidden, or even uncommom for that matter. But, you see, the Koran gives Muslims the right to lie to the kufirs and infidels. Great religion you have there.
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 09, 2006 04:06 PM (rUyw4)
5
Yeah the left wing media outlets and politicians only have the balls to give free kicks to America, Conservatives, Christians and Jews.
Posted by: MathewK at February 09, 2006 09:24 PM (pVHqF)
6
[snif], you had me at Shackleford ... [hug] [/bad gay]
But I'm seriously, how have we not made this connection before ...
Posted by: Leopold Stotch at February 09, 2006 11:31 PM (MnZD9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Pot Meet Kettle
The Canadian Islamic Congress, which supports sharia law in Canada and elsewhere, is
claiming that the new Conservative government is about to usher in a police state.
Ironical.
Posted by: Rusty at
02:05 PM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 34 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Funny - if I saw a police state coming - I would be packing my bags. Are they?
Posted by: hondo at February 09, 2006 02:21 PM (3aakz)
2
Where'd they go? If Canada is a 'police state' what the hell is Pakistan?
Posted by: Rusty at February 09, 2006 02:29 PM (JQjhA)
3
They are (CIC) indeed the people who are the most affraid of those changes in the Canadian Law. In fact, the vast majority of the people I know wants these amendments to be made!
You know what, these modifications will protect us much more than the disastrous gun control policy àla Paul Martin...
- Max
Posted by: Max at February 09, 2006 02:34 PM (WM45z)
4
Very ironical indeed, Rusty.
These people are supposed to know what means a police state. By saying that Canada could possibly become one, just because the conservative have been elected (as a minority!) makes me wonder how can they be so stupid...
- Max
Posted by: Max at February 09, 2006 02:42 PM (+kFf8)
5
If you check out their website you see just how radical they are.
Posted by: Rusty at February 09, 2006 02:46 PM (JQjhA)
6
I think the Canadian people need to pack the bags of these Islamists and send them back to wherever they came from. That's exactly what Canada and the US and Europe should do before these people cause any more devilment(as my grandmother used to say).
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 09, 2006 03:18 PM (rUyw4)
7
Well...
Shouldn't they be happy then?
Posted by: Brandon at February 09, 2006 04:59 PM (CzSs6)
8
Bravo, Canada. If your security measures are worrying the CIC, you're doing something right. Yeah JJ. Making them pack their bags would be sweet. If they want to live under sharia law, it's not like there aren't lots of countries with it already to choose from. They could save themselves alot of time and effort this way.
Posted by: Graeme at February 09, 2006 05:15 PM (FB00D)
9
For libtards, the sky is in perpetually imminent danger of falling any minute.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 09, 2006 08:34 PM (0yYS2)
10
Canada is becoming a police state?!?!?
I'll need *Well Over* a dozen Bradors -- the old 12% alcohol kind -- to believe that one!
And then, the next day, I'll wake up around the crack of noon, and...
Bill
Posted by: Bill at February 09, 2006 10:46 PM (Sz2GJ)
11
Leftists and muslim extremists both squeal and cry foul when any government tries to curb their so called civil liberties, i.e. the right to hate and actively undermine their own society and country.
Look at it this way, the greater the intensity of leftwing/muslim extremist protestation to a piece of policy/law/legislation, the better that policy/law/legislation is.
Posted by: MathewK at February 09, 2006 10:55 PM (pVHqF)
12
Oh darn! Their momentum towards Sharia law has had the brakes put on it. Poor dears.
Does anyone know the outcome of talks about allowing Sharia Law in their civil courts late last summer? I can't remember which part of Canada it was.
Posted by: Oyster at February 10, 2006 05:47 AM (YudAC)
13
You're damn right Mathew; all one need do is read Marx and Lenin, then compare activist groups and historical events with their plans to destroy civilization, and you'll see that nothing liberals have ever done has been for the good of civilization of humanity, regardless of the situation. They have managed to be on the winning side in many issues, and thereby can claim to have been right, and every time we've let them win, our society slips a little closer to oblivion.
It all started with the womens' suffrage movement, which was a valid cause that they tried, and partially turned to their own use, which was erosion of the established power structure. Then was collectivism, which succeeded more than we realize, because it gave us Socialist Security and the labor unions, both of which still impede our economy today, and threaten future generations with economic collapse. Then they infiltrated the civil rights movement, and steered it toward what it is today; an establishment of racist demogoguery run by con artists and scammers like Sharpton, Farrakhan, Jackson, et al, who by rights should be relegated to hustling three card monty on streetcorners and pimping, but who instead, thanks to liberalism, wield considerable power in our society, which in itself is a telling fact.
Nothing liberals have ever touched has turned out for the better, but quite the contrary, everything they take an interest in only results in the degredation of society to the point that we have now, when citizens of formerly great nations won't even stand up against a savage, primitive invader because they just don't care enough. Liberals should all be killed before it's too late.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 10, 2006 06:00 AM (0yYS2)
14
Oyster,
It is Ontario. They are still in court debating about this, I think. But from what I heard, there's no chance they'll get it. People in Québec have already said no, for sure...
- Max
Posted by: Max at February 10, 2006 08:24 AM (Ol+Ma)
15
So what will they say next to get attention from the New York Pravda?
Posted by: sandpiper at February 10, 2006 09:33 AM (U+eLg)
16
All you need to do is type Alex Jones in a google search or go to infowars.com and see all the hours of documentation they have on what is really going on in the US, and then you can wonder how our Canadian government is following suit. Hey, our farmers know how the government is slowing taking away our property rights and controlling our firearms. Want to get an idea of what is coming next? www.infowars.com Do not take my word for anything, check it out yourself!
Brant
Posted by: Brant at February 17, 2006 10:46 AM (QsSNO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Apologies For Cartoon Jihad and the 'Moderate' Muslim
Via
Dean and
INDC, he're is
a website in which Muslims say they're sorry for the cartoon jihad. The problem with the website is that a) it assumes collective guilt b) it is registered
anonymously through Domains by Proxy.
a) All of us should reject the primitive notion of collective guilt. The cartoon jihadis are holding an entire country, Denmark, responsible for the act of a single newspaper. This is collectivism at its worst. Similarly, we should not not hold all Muslims responsible for the acts of the religious fascists wishing to impose their system on the West. Muslims who believe in freedom of expression have nothing to apologize for.
b) If it is so important for a group of moderate Muslims to apologize for what other extremists are doing, why cover the domain's registration information? One only pays a third party to cover your registration information when one has something to hide. Could it be that they are afraid of revealing who they are? I think that it is very likely.
But, besides this website, there is also a serious problem in the way other Muslims are reacting. The main problem is in differentiating between moderate Muslims and radical, extremist, or conservative Muslims. What is the definition of a moderate vs. a radical? And in Islam, is there no such thing as a liberal Muslim?
Dorkafork and Dean Esmay have been trying to argue that there is nothing inherently antiliberal in Islam. I address that here. Their other point, that Muslim countries are becoming more liberal is well taken and spot on--especially given that this liberalization comes after the Bush Presdency, negating criticisms that the Islamic world would be better if America retreated from the war on terror.
However, if there is no connection between Islam and repressivenes, then how do they explain the statistic that
for each increase of 1% in the percentage of Muslims in the population the level of freedom goes down by 0.031 points on a scale of 7. (Roughly 1 in 200.) The relationship is also highly significant
But really the debate is over how one distinguishes between the liberal, moderate, and extremist Muslim.
For instance, much of what Dorkafork links to here, is a rejection of violence as a reaction to the Danish cartoons. Should I consider a Muslim who rejects violence, yet who still believes that such cartoons should be banned based on Islamic law a moderate?
And if a moderate Muslim can believes that the press ought to be censored so as not to violate Quranic injunctions, then what do we call a Muslim who disagrees and is fully secular in legal orientation? If the former is the mainstream view, wouldn't this make that the moderate view? And if the latter is the minority view, would not this mean that the secularist is a liberal among the greater Muslim community?
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
01:21 PM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1762 words, total size 12 kb.
1
>>>"Could it be that they are afraid of revealing who they are?"
Yes. My understanding is that they are actually located in a middle eastern country, so their lives would be in danger if they were placed physically.
Give credit where it's due. These are precisely the people we don't want to alienate. There is no winning the war on terror without them.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 09, 2006 01:53 PM (8e/V4)
2
True, but one cannot alienate 'allies'. Alliances are formed out of mutual interests. It is only when those mutual interests diverge that we can expect our alliance to end.
Posted by: Rusty at February 09, 2006 02:19 PM (JQjhA)
3
A couple comments:
a) I lived in Saudi Arabia for about 5 1/2 years working for the oil company there, and I must say this about the collective guilt: While as an Westerner (American) I certainly reject the notion of collective guilt, it's not likely they will anytime soon. The Middle East is very much a group culture in a way that just defies Western analysis. I had to see it and live in it to really get it.
b) J. Carlos above I think is quite right. If they really are Muslim moderates living in the Middle East right now, they would have every reason to hide their identity. I know I certainly would.
I think the larger and more long-term bottom line is this: If that culture can't adapt to modernity better than it's doing now, eventually, it'll be destroyed in the same sort of way more primitive cultures always are destroyed by the more advanced ones. Not because anyone will purposefully set out to do so at first. They'll just ankle bite long enough that the West will turn around and finally stomp them out.
I think the only hope for anything different is something like the experiment going on in Iraq today.
Posted by: gp at February 09, 2006 03:07 PM (6lRNE)
4
Beth, I can't find much to disagree with in your post. Great job, everyone should read it and perhaps they would understand, but maybe your insight comes from living in Turkey and watching the radical tide roll in. In any event, it is obvious you are familiar with Islam.
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 09, 2006 04:18 PM (rUyw4)
5
Good job Beth!
Glad you brought up the part about Islam is an" ideology, not a race" or religion by the terms I understand religion to be. (I had my ass handed to me over at Protein Wisdom-I think-these things happen sometimes as I try to educate myself and I lose track of who gave me the last shelacking).
In talking (I'm living in Japan) with my Jordanian and Turkish "friends/customers", who none of them claim to be Muslim for reasons to many to mention, they have explained a lot of history to me about the Islamic practices and the region. They really don't like each other much and both privately tell me,"As your friend you should not trust the (Turk/Arabs-depending on who's doing the talking)." Oddly or not, the business I've conducted with both peoples has not been in my favor as each chisels away at the end of the deal, in spite of no complaints on a job well done. Which is why I add 20% to both in the estimates-gotta admire the humor. Something about forewarned is forearmed, I think.
I do 99% of my business with the Japanese and have NEVER had any problem getting paid and additional orders. The true irony enters when the ONLY foreigner that I've done business with (a self-proclaimed Anarchist), has gone above and beyond the contract and payments for services, unsolicited and immediately. A Frenchmen, an honorable Anarchist.
You should've seen the seething fury a few years back when the war was getting underway. I was surrounded by three Brits, a Frenchmen, two Aussies and another American, trying to find out "Why George Bush.....yadda yadda yadda". Inside I was deep in my memory banks in search of an actionable response-I love pressure, really, but not idiocy. I came across a memory of Chesty Puller and started smiling. Before long I was laughing like Strother Martin (as Liberty's lacky ) when Edmond O'Brien was getting the beating of his life, in that classic "The Man who shot Liberty Valance". (BTW-A movie replete with some very interesting symbolisms applicable even for todays unfolding events.) At any rate the one sided verbal assault on yours truly, dried right up. I wonder if any of that has to do with the Frenchmens honorability.
Posted by: forest hunter at February 09, 2006 08:32 PM (Fq6zR)
6
I keep forgetting to ask- please to forgive unknowing FNG for dumb questions, but that's why they callem' FNG's. I should sign in as humble dummy, but I here pride is one of the first things to go and based on what I got left, I clearly missed something, somewhere along the way! What's the meaning of TPS REPORTS-LOL and I forgot the others already-too much preamble, but it was a good year, so I bought three jugs. Now don't be laughing at me!
Posted by: forest hunter at February 09, 2006 09:45 PM (Fq6zR)
7
Forest,
Oyster here, reporting for dummy duty. I've asked that myself and no one's yet told me. So you're not alone there!
We demand some one clue us in NOW!
Posted by: Oyster at February 10, 2006 06:05 AM (YudAC)
8
I don't even know what FNG is. I'm so ashamed.
Posted by: Oyster at February 10, 2006 06:07 AM (YudAC)
9
A TPS report refers to a movie called Office Space. If you haven't seen the movie you should do so right away! It is one of the funniest movies of all time IMHO and, it just gets funnier with each new viewing (I have watched the movie at least 4 times).
So, in the movie, this poor shlub is working a worthless job, filling out (or not) worthless forms. One of the forms that he is repeatedly harrassed about is a TPS report. Go immediately and rent the movie.
Posted by: Babs at February 10, 2006 09:13 AM (iZZlp)
10
I've seen the movie. But I don't understand what it has to do with a blog, as Rusty used to have at the comment prompt "No TPS Reports, Please". Because if he means "no useless or worthless comments", we could eliminate a bunch of jerks that come here.
Posted by: Oyster at February 10, 2006 12:05 PM (YudAC)
Posted by: lucia at February 10, 2006 12:21 PM (9+UeS)
12
Oyster: FNG means ....ing New Guy
But now we've got an hihthee and IMHO to deal with!
As Insanetor Kennedy put it, when he asked about terrorism, being a Senator for the "US", why is the booze tax as high as it is, who's Olds is that, breathing without lying...... "WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?"
Posted by: forest hunter at February 10, 2006 07:51 PM (Fq6zR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Creeping Fascism in Europe: Press Regulation Coming
What is the lesson to be learned here?
1) Muslims threaten Europe with boycotts and violence and demand press regulations.
2) Europe begins the process of outlawing images deemed offensive to Muslims.
Lesson: If you want Europe to adopt sharia (Islamic) law, simply threaten then.
My guess is that next Muslims will demand an end to public displays of pornographic material, something common in Europe. Also expect a demand for the prohibition of Christian missionaries trying to convert Muslims in the near future, sex-segregates schools, and tax supported mosques.
In fact, European Muslims are already demanding all of the above. Given that native Europeans have a very low birthrate, Europe has high numbers of Muslim immigrants (legal and illegal), and that Muslim immigrants have a very high birth rate, it is only a matter of time before Europe once again becomes part of Dar al-Islam. But I had always supposed this would be a hundred years or more in the future. But if Europeans are willing to cave to the fascistic demands of a minority that is still rather small, it seems inevetable that as that minority becomes larger they will cave even faster.
Could Europe adopt Islamofascist sharia law long before Muslims become a majority on the Continent? It seems more likely every day.
LGF:
The European Union may try to draw up a media code of conduct to avoid a repeat of the furor caused by the publication across Europe of cartoons of the Prophet Mohammad, an EU commissioner said on Thursday.
Sure, the code will be 'voluntary'. We believe you.
And if the EU doesn't adopt 'the code', Muslims in the U.K. are pressing for one. Clarity and Resolve:
Muslim scholars holding emergency talks called for a change in the law to stop insulting pictures of the Prophet Muhammad being published.
Officials from the Muslim Action Committee (MAC) meeting in Birmingham also called for the Press Complaints Commission code to be tightened to restrict British newspapers from following European media in printing the caricatures.
A protest march from Trafalgar Square to Hyde Park on February 18 involving around 50,000 Muslims would be staged, Shaikh Faiz Saddiqi, spokesman for the MAC, said.
Birmingham, I would note, is home to a notoriously radical group of followers of Omar Bakri Mohammed.
Bakri has said that the cartoon blasphemers should be executed. It was
Bakri's followers who staged the London demonstration where signs such as 'behead those who insult Islam' were seen.
Posted by: Rusty at
11:24 AM
| Comments (27)
| Add Comment
Post contains 424 words, total size 3 kb.
1
The larger their muslim population becomes, the more repressive those countries will become-- just like in the rest of the muslim world. Today press restrictions, tommorrow sharia.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 09, 2006 11:30 AM (8e/V4)
2
JC
Er, Duh! Like, I didn't see this coming! JC - the muslims may have been the match for this - but the fuse has always been there.
Rusty - I think I did point this out (difference between rights and state regulations) a day or so ago in another comment.
Everyone should be a little "Christian" and not completely blame the muslims for all this - the Euros will be Euros, and they are not like us.
Posted by: hondo at February 09, 2006 11:40 AM (3aakz)
3
>>>...and not completely blame the muslims for all this - the Euros will be Euros, and they are not like us."
That might be true. The Left tends to be censorious by nature, so it's a natural "progression" for the Europeans. They are merely enacting PC speech codes into law-- something the American Left would also love to do here in the States.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 09, 2006 11:45 AM (8e/V4)
4
doc: dhimmitude is IMPOSSIBLE without fascism; it is a necessary precondition. and as you point out: the eu is making the first steps in this direction. just what the enemy wnats/needs.
Posted by: reliapundit at February 09, 2006 11:47 AM (XPOQn)
5
Well, Europe was under the bootheel of nazis for a few years, so I suppose they are entitled to sharia law too, being so stupid as to ignore history. It's only fair. Back then, the Jews had to wear the Star of David, this time around, women will have to wear burqas and veils. To be totally selfish about it, it couldn't happen to a better bunch of people - I mean if people can't and won't defend themselves, they need to be slaves - sounds like the will of allah to me. Who am I to argue with Fate??
Posted by: goesh at February 09, 2006 12:14 PM (vX0fY)
6
"T-Shirt Alert, Code Red, Code Red!!!
Swam, Swarm, Swarm!"
White House Security Detail
Talking about creeping fascism!
Posted by: greg at February 09, 2006 12:57 PM (q5wwn)
7
Greg's back! Missed ya - if it's the same greg.
Fascism is such a worn out word, I thought most would have learned that by now after the Soup Nazi.
BTW - fascism is actually a derivative of socialism with a populist nationalistic flavor. Chuckle chuckle.
Posted by: hondo at February 09, 2006 01:03 PM (3aakz)
8
You missed me?
I thought you all wanted to kill me.
Posted by: Greg at February 09, 2006 01:05 PM (q5wwn)
9
greg,
wiretaps won't keep me from saying anything I wouldn't say otherwise-- unless I'm conversing with overseas Al Qaida. So I've lost no freedom whatsoever. Yet European speech laws would indeed gag me and deny me my freedom. See the diff? Yet Lefties are cool with the latter, but not with the former. Are you people insane? The former protects us, the latter protects THEM. You people ARE insane.
I totally missed you by the way!
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 09, 2006 01:11 PM (8e/V4)
10
That's Maxie - and he's been in a funk ever since you left. Kill you? Never! It's no crime to bore people.
Posted by: hondo at February 09, 2006 01:12 PM (3aakz)
11
Carlos,
It's nice to be missed, even by someone who calls me insane.
I've been on Europe's case for imprisoning Holocaust revisionists, who doubt the 6,000,000 figure.
Where is your outrage?
Posted by: greg at February 09, 2006 01:14 PM (q5wwn)
12
Big news from Montréal, QC, CA.
I've just heard over the radio that the local musulman leaders had asked muslims living in the province of Québec to boycott protest over the Danish cartoons, saying that it would ternish their image...
- Max
Posted by: Max at February 09, 2006 01:23 PM (+kFf8)
13
>>>Where is your outrage?
Personally, I think it's ridiculous. The Euro "humanists" censor free speech, but christo-fascistic America doesn't. Telling, no?
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 09, 2006 01:28 PM (8e/V4)
14
goesh: The only trouble is, once (before?) the Islamic supremacists have finished conquering Europe, guess where they'll set their sights next?
And I have the distinct impression that it will indeed come well before Muslims actually reach majority status in Europe, because they are already near a majority in the younger age groups, and revolution has always been a young man's game.
Posted by: Joshua at February 09, 2006 02:11 PM (2c7xL)
15
JC
Saw an interview with the Danish newspaper editor who started all this - he said his purpose was not to mock islam, but to mock the concept of religion in general - in keeping with "enlightened" Danish and Euro modern tradition. (I am serious!)
He/they are the very same people who would put Piss Christ on the cover of a magazine - as a mocking joke and social commentary.
The artists covered the Danish political spectrum - from what passes as conservative in Denmark to the left.
This was done in Sept with no visible outrage. Later, a Danish iman took the 12 cartoons along with 3 additional very offensive ones (that he would say where they came from)to show around the ME.
The reaction today is staged - deliberately fanned by islamists as a pep rally.
the Danes and Euros didn't expect this - it caught them by surprise.
Screw them both! They deserve each other.
Posted by: hondo at February 09, 2006 02:19 PM (3aakz)
16
Hey, I've got an idea. We seem to have a plethora of rednecks and red staters, so let's colonize Europe. A redneck reverse invasion/colonization of Europe. Brilliant!
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 09, 2006 03:27 PM (rUyw4)
17
"T-Shirt Alert, Code Red, Code Red!!!
Swam, Swarm, Swarm!"
Where is your outrage?
Don't start throwing out the accusations before you know what anyone has said about it.
Just for the record, I didn't miss you.
Posted by: Oyster at February 09, 2006 04:20 PM (sMLtC)
18
Oyster reveals that he can't think rationally.
What accusations do you speak of, Oyster?
I've reread my two posts and I don't find any accusations within them other than to accuse Europe of criminalizing thought in regards to their policy of imprisoning Holocaust revisionist, for example, Ernst Zundel.
So shuck of Oyster. I didn't miss you either, you effeminate dweeb.
KOOOWWWWHHHHAAKKKK TWOOOOEY, there's yer oyster.
Posted by: greg at February 09, 2006 04:56 PM (q5wwn)
19
That's the greg I know - back to being a dick! - and insulting one of the few around here who doesn't engage in hyper-tirades of death, destruction , and violence.
Way to go greg!
Posted by: hondo at February 09, 2006 05:12 PM (3aakz)
20
It is now obvious. There will be another dark ages in our lifetimes. All that really matters is birthrates. And what the pro-choicers don't realize is that by lowering our countries birthrates by allowing abortion they are handing us over to a society much more patriarchal than our own.
Posted by: craig at February 09, 2006 07:35 PM (b3fZv)
21
Who let the moron back in?
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 09, 2006 08:36 PM (0yYS2)
22
It may be a lot closer than a 100 years rusty, check this out -
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110007760
Remember what Rumsfeld said about feeding a crocodile, it'll only eat you later.
Europe's days are numbered, they are busy finding things to hand over to the extremists, like more laws to accomodate Islam, later they will have nothing else to hand over and it'll be flee or be eaten and dissappear.
Posted by: MathewK at February 09, 2006 11:11 PM (pVHqF)
23
I admit it. I'm effeminate.
Posted by: Oyster at February 10, 2006 06:31 AM (YudAC)
24
I feel pretty,
oh so pretty,
I feel pretty and witty and gay!!...
Posted by: oyster at February 10, 2006 07:23 AM (q5wwn)
25
We have the BALD EAGLE as our symbol of our country and the COWBOY is distictly american so for europe they can have a chicken and a coward as theirs
Posted by: sandpiper at February 10, 2006 09:36 AM (U+eLg)
26
Oyster, I think you are all those things and more. And we all love your mind!
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 10, 2006 10:34 AM (rUyw4)
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 10, 2006 10:35 AM (rUyw4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Yemen Exploits Cartoon Controversy to Close the Yemen Observer
The Prime Minister of Yemen has revoked the license of the English language online and print newspaper, The Yemen Observer. Technically he doesnt have the authority to do that, but its Yemen.
The despotic, corrupt, anti-democratic, terrorist supporting Yemeni regime finds it in its interests to discourage moderation. And further, it may be looking to shut down this English language source of information about Yemen.
YO "I am very surprised by this development," Mohammed Al-Asadi, editor-in-chief of the Yemen Observer said. "They want to close the newspaper in response to our efforts and continuous calls for understanding, tolerance and accepting the apologies of the Danish people, officials, and editors. We have received dozens of apologies from Denmark.
"We are totally against the publication of cartoons and at the same time we should accept apologies that have been several times made by the Danish editors. We should.
We, at the Yemen Observer, believe in dialogue if misunderstanding takes place anywhere on any issue and believe in co-existence," Al-Asadi added.
Here's their current editorial, "The Art of Losing Opportunities."
This is an outragous abuse of power and manipulation of popular sentiment to target those advocating dialog.
Update: Khalid Solman, the editor of the opposition paper al-Thoury, and several writers were found guilty of the offense of insulting President Saleh. The editor received a two year suspended jail sentence. Two writers got a one year suspended jail term, and all of them are not allowed to write for 6 months.
So now if the Yemen Observer (whose license was revoked for publishing the insulting cartoons) is allowed to republish while al-ThouryÂ’s staff's sentence remains in force, it will mean that in Yemen, its a bigger crime to insult Saleh than to insult Mohammed.
Posted by: JaneNovak at
09:43 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 308 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Keep showing the cartoons! Burn baby Burn! About 30 down, only a billion more to go!
Posted by: Andy at February 09, 2006 10:22 AM (tMU4W)
2
Posted by ????? Sounds like Jane. If so, an opportunity for the Yemen govt - should have seen it coming.
Posted by: hondo at February 09, 2006 11:28 AM (3aakz)
3
lol, yes of course its me. hey hondo how are ya? i lost my password when i got a new computer and I had to get a new one. ill fix that.
do you believe this? they are targeting the moderates?
Posted by: Jane at February 09, 2006 12:34 PM (Ffvoi)
4
A target of moderate opportunity.
Posted by: hondo at February 09, 2006 12:36 PM (3aakz)
5
According to the White House Yemen is a valuable ally in the Global War on Terror. http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/achievement/chap1.html
Posted by: john ryan at February 09, 2006 01:32 PM (TcoRJ)
6
I haven't heard them say that lately, they used to say that a lot, but once the 23 al-Qaeda escaped, they may be rethinking that position.
Yemen has accomidated some US requests for cooperation, they are not outright opposed, but the cooperation is sporatic and in response to pressure. And then every once in a while, they escape.
Posted by: Jane at February 09, 2006 02:04 PM (Ffvoi)
7
Its called diplomacy - being diplomatic - John - or being polite in public. But you know that.
Posted by: hondo at February 09, 2006 02:27 PM (3aakz)
8
Dear Jane
As a journalist in Yemen Observer, we are not like tools to do what other want from us.
We have wrote a report, which reflected anger of Yemen people toward cartoons that insulted Prophet Mohammed (PUBH).
The decision of shutting down the paper was due to policies of the paper to report reality about corruption in the poor Arab country, and suffering of the Yemeni people.
During three years ago, the paper became a key window for world to see Yemen and know its real economic, social and political situations.
Posted by: Adnan at February 10, 2006 06:36 AM (moHXf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Meanwhile, Somewhere in Dar al Islam....
Another Jawa Report editorial cartoon. Click for larger image and feel free to reproduce and distribute.

Related from the Islamic Republic: Rape Victim Receives Death Penalty. More here and here.
Related: French newspaper with another blasphemous cartoon and I guess we have to boycott Egypt since the cartoons were published there as well.
Posted by: Rusty at
09:42 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 65 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The Iranian cases bare close watching - seperate from all this bruha that has been happening over islam. It goes to the very heart of the internal domestic goings-on inside that country.
Iran is slowly inching towards a cliff (internally) which will forsee where Iran goes externally - internationally.
This is one of the reasons (clues) that I've not been overly interested in a confrontation with Iran at this time. Something is going to happen inside Iran that will dictate the future of that country - and it ain't the nukes I'm talking about.
Posted by: hondo at February 09, 2006 11:51 AM (3aakz)
2
Iran is a backwards country and why isnt the UN objecting to the exicution of a inocent girl the way they objected to the exiction of a convicted muderer like ROGER COLEMAN?
Posted by: sandpiper at February 10, 2006 09:39 AM (U+eLg)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
American Among al-Qaeda Escapees in Yemen
Jaber (Gaber) Al-banna (Elbaneh), one of the Lackawanna, New York al-Qaeda cell is in the wind with the (now twice escaped) Cole bombers and the Lindburgh tanker bombers.
Elbaneh had a 5 million dollar pricetag on his head before he turned himself in in Yemen in January 2003.
Other interesting facts about the escape:
The mosque they tunneled to is one where Judge Hamoud al-Hittar regularly preaches. al-Hittar is the judge in charge of Yemen's Dialog program which aims to rehabilitate AQ through dialog, and over 200 have been released from jail under this program. Only a few have shown up in Iraq with Zarchawi after that.
The prisoners were in the custody of the Political Security Organization (which answers directly to President Saleh) at a high security prison in the middle of the capital city, Sanaa.
News Yemen "there were previous reports received by the prisonÂ’s outside guards pointing out to hearing sounds of digging at unknown places and intermittent times."
The tunnel was one and a half times the size of a football field, took two months to build and required nearly two tons of earth to be removed.
The Yemen Times reports today that some of the terrorists may have been recaptured in Yemen.
Why I'm not surprised: lots of preliminary indications of al-Qaeda support at the upper levels of the Yemeni government, either from sympathy or corruption.
Posted by: JaneNovak at
08:52 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 243 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Why did he turn himself in you ask- to collect the reward of course , plus the three hots and a cot was real head turner. "Hand me another brick al-Acccchput, we're still quite a few short."
Posted by: forest hunter at February 09, 2006 06:29 PM (Fq6zR)
2
I started watching the TMC miniseries "Sleeper Cell", and one of the early episodes features an imam clearly modeled after the whole "Dialog" idea. The idea was taken seriously, to the point the show had the sleeper cell murder the peace-preaching imam.
I found the whole thing odd, because if the writers had been paying attention to the news, they'd know that the "graduates" of the Dialog program tend to go right back to slitting throats for Allah. Given this latest news -- that the people running the Dialog program are involved in breaking the jihadis out of prison -- the whole episode has become a joke.
Posted by: Robert Crawford at February 10, 2006 12:31 PM (Gn9tM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Image of The Prophet Muhammed (sawt) Found on Tortilla
Did I say tortilla?
I meant in cow dung.
UPDATE: Better make that a pancake.
Posted by: Rusty at
08:51 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.
1
This reminds me of the news story several years ago where people were coming from all over the country to see the image of Jesus slowly beginning to appear on the side of a wall here in Texas - near Austin or San Antonio I think. People flocked to town for about week before someone remembered that there had once been a painting on that wall advertising Willie Nelson's Fourth of July concert and the old image was bleeding through the newer layers of paint. Even as a devout Christian, I never get tired of hearing of people standing in line for hours to see images of Jesus or Mary in reflections of glass or tortillas. I feel pretty comfortable with my knowledge that if Jesus were going to give me a sign, it would be something a bit more profound than some flat bread. I wonder if poor people in India ever see Vishnu or Ganesh on a plate of naan.
Posted by: slug at February 09, 2006 01:48 PM (wcNc2)
2
I didn't even try to go out and find Jesus in a pancake but it came to me anyway.
If you look long enough, it's kind of like those hidden pictures at the mall kiosk. He's got this listed on ebay and will probably make a couple of thousand off of it.
http://www.click2houston.com/family/6881020/detail.html
Looks a little like Willie.
Posted by: slug at February 09, 2006 04:10 PM (wcNc2)
3
I just left the head and no,REALLY, I swear "the head"! Damned if it don't....
Posted by: forest hunter at February 09, 2006 06:35 PM (Fq6zR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
E-Bay Auctions Cindy Sheehan's Brain
I'll start the bidding at
two-bits. But if this is Cindy Sheehan's brain, how come the jar says it belongs to someone named Abbey Normal?
UPDATE: Cindy Sheehan not running for Senate, cites lack of funds to buy own brain on eBay.
Posted by: Rusty at
08:49 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Cindy Sheman's brain? So they are basically selling a bucket of shit?
Posted by: Andy at February 09, 2006 10:47 AM (tMU4W)
2
Proceeds go to nonprofit, eh? Did you read who the nonprofit is? I guess the hungry children these people care so much for take a backseat to partisan activities. Better to fund politician's and their supporters who seek to force more taxes out of us which the bulk of will go to "administrative costs".
Funny I didn't see any pictures there of her smooching Chavez.
Posted by: Oyster at February 09, 2006 11:28 AM (sMLtC)
3
So she finally figured out the left was using her for all they could, no intention of supporting her or voting for her.
The fiery end is getting closer.
Posted by: MathewK at February 09, 2006 04:36 PM (pVHqF)
4
"E-Bay Auctions Cindy Sheehan's Brain"
This is not true. E-Bay won't try to sell something that has never existed.
Bill
Posted by: Bill at February 09, 2006 11:33 PM (Sz2GJ)
5
So whats her problem anyway looks like her ambitions are as big as a walnut and her rediclous whinnings why dont she just go home
Posted by: sandpiper at February 10, 2006 09:43 AM (U+eLg)
6
I thought it was the democrats that are the party of hate (sarcasism). Seems like some people that blog on this site hate this woman. If any of you would like to sign up for this war and are under the age of 42, please email me, I have some recruiter friends that would love to get you over there. If your too old or you have an injury, how about a family member?
Posted by: SSG Jeffrey Peskoff at February 10, 2006 04:47 PM (IHPdr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Google's Blog Censorship Hypocrisy
I've contacted Google (which owns Blogger and .blogspot) about dozens of terrorist websites run from .blogspot accounts. They have NEVER taken down those largely Arabic websites advocating the murder of Jews and Christians, yet, if you go to
The Study of Revenge website which lampoons Islam they feel it necessary to warn you of offensive material. So, first Google caves to the Chinese and then they cave to thin-skinned Muslims.
Hat tip: Tim at OpinionBug.
Posted by: Rusty at
08:42 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 83 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I wonder if this isn't also a thinly disguised shot across the bow to other Blogger blogs that criticized the censorship of Google China?
Posted by: Joshua at February 09, 2006 02:03 PM (2c7xL)
2
So what are the addreses of these terrorist websites? You know Google, unless it's got a high hit count, it doesn't count.
So lets get together and flag these sites... a lot. I suspect that is what happened at The Study of Revenge.
Posted by: Jeff at February 09, 2006 02:22 PM (yiMNP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Atheists to the Left of Me, Religious Fanatics to the Right
I actually
disagree with Danny on this one. Intentionally offending people is often (but not always) legitimate discourse. Especially during times of war. I would suggest readers recall all of those wonderful Bugs Bunny cartoons vilifying the Japs and Germans during WWII. For some odd reason we hold the conflicting idea that these intentionally offensive cartoons were somehow wrong, yet killing those who were lampooned was ok.
And speaking of Bugs Bunny: What do you think the wascally wabbit said in order to get his fatwa, depicted below?
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
08:34 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 110 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Intentionally offending muslims is not going to help us in the war on terror. Speak your mind, stand on principle, YES. Gratuitously offend just for shits and giggles, NO. Shits and giggles could very well come with American lives as the price.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 09, 2006 08:48 AM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Howie at February 09, 2006 07:25 PM (D3+20)
3
Don‘testosterone try overtime, the proper information arrive as you the very least , be prepared the crooks to.
chine destock chine destock
Posted by: chine destock at February 01, 2013 11:47 AM (3CX6N)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Iranian Holocaust Cartoon Competition: An Essay Concerning Common Sense, And Those Who Fail To Adhere To It
Let's look at this from the point of view of an abbreviation:
B.F.D.
The full sentece rhymes with Dig Trucking Real.
Okay, now for some hard headed realism.
The Iranians are calling for a cartoon contest depicting the Holocaust in response to the current Mohammed Is A Pedophile, Pimp, Goat Humping, Wife Beating, Masturbating To Wilbur (he did have visions you know) cartoons printed in, well, everywhere.
Fact: Studies have shown that 100% of the people that died in the Holocaust are still dead. Studies have also shown that 100% of them are incapable of being offended by Iranian Holocaust cartoon contests.
Fact: There are still many people in the world who survived the Nazi death camps (referred to in the above as The Holocaust). All of whom, I would surmise, after surviving said camps, would hardly be offended by said cartoons.
Fact: I actually quantified this using a complicated algorithm. Using verified sources, I completed an exhaustive study of the noted above death camp survivors, factored in the expected responses from same to the threatened Holocaust Cartoon Contest, and came up with a solid percentage. 74%, had they actually known about the referred to contest, would, given the parameters of the algorithm, would have said: BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
10% would have said "Cartoons? You're worried about cartoons? Your mother has had her boils lanced and you're worried about cartoons?"
5% would have said "Mohammed is MY bitch!"
The remaining 19% would have said, "I did my time, fatwa Vinnie!"
Conclusion: While the Ummah continues to rage about the Mohammed cartoons, no one will give a spit in the wind about the Iranian ones. That is not a bad thing. The civilized world has gone far to heal the wound that is the Holocaust, while the uncivilized are still unable to heal the wounds inflicted upon them by the birth of Mohammed.
Addendum: I would love it if the Iranian press would submit images of Christ as a trannie midget porn star, Buddha as a elephant humping bestialitist, and any other various and sundry defilements of world religions that they can muster. Because if they stay on the road they're on right now, soon they'll be printing their effluvium using one sharp stone against another, heiroglyphics style.
Addendum II: If you think I'm mocking the Holocaust, and those who endured it, I'm not. I'm mocking those who think that mocking the Holocaust would actually offend. Let's face it, peeps. If YOU had survived the death camps, would some lame cartoons in a Muslm newspaper offend you? As for those of you who think that the Iranian deal is offensive, treat yourself like a Jew in the death camps for a week. Starve yourself, beat yourself, and give your address to a known serial murderer. After that, nothing printed in any newspaper would offend you.
Nice try, Iran.
Posted by: Vinnie at
01:55 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 509 words, total size 3 kb.
1
This is more complicated than you allude to. I know most of this was tongue-in-cheek, but the Iranians position is, "If Europe is so free let's see them prove it and print these cartoons." Now you know they will make cartoons which explicitly deny the holocaust and there are European countries which have made it against the law to deny it. So it's not likely, unless they promise amnesty, that anyone would be print at least those specific to denial.
I understand that freedom of speech also includes the freedom to "choose" whether to speak, but this is going to give them ground to stand on and show that there is a bit of hypocrisy going on in Europe.
Nevermind that this really has nothing to do with cartoons and everything to do with the freedom to choose what one will or will not say, but the Iranians and many others won't see that.
Posted by: Oyster at February 09, 2006 04:08 AM (YudAC)
2
Among the few things that offend me are the facts that it isn't legal to kill muslims, liberals, and other useless parasites on sight. Yet.
Civilization has never been saved by those who didn't want to get their hands dirty. I like getting my hands dirty.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 09, 2006 04:32 AM (0yYS2)
3
IM:
As do I! As do I! But this parasite analogy falls short of the shit that is sloppin'n floppin' around us. This is a highly "educated" breed of ...how do you say -things found in nappy's. Chesty'd be right at home-ammo or no. This is an aggressive viral form of State and Government funded incoherent slobs incapable of feeding themselves-hence the parasitical form. I don't care which planet they escaped from but here, lets just say, it's not going to be there homecoming party!
Posted by: forest hunter at February 09, 2006 05:13 AM (Fq6zR)
4
The Iranian cartoons will get no reaction worldwide except for a few complaints from prominent Jewish goups. Although they do fall under free speech, don't expect to see them printed outside the Middle East, not because the West thinks them too inappropriate to print, but becuase it would be a colossal waste of resources:
1) the headline "Islamic cartoons ridicule Holocaust, Jews" is about as shocking as: "Saudi Arabia found to contain vast quantities of sand, oil" and will help to sell about as as many newspaper copies. Okay, they may sell a few more Guardians, but that's it. After the first day, these new ones will disappear into the sea of anti-Jew cartoons already out there.
2)There will be no newsworthy reaction to this. A rabbi or two may say how insensitive the Iranians are, but there won't be any riots, destruction or bloodshed, so there's nothing to attract viewers / readers.
Posted by: Graeme at February 09, 2006 06:35 AM (FB00D)
5
You're right, Graeme. What I'll find interesting is CNN's response (as well as some other news sources). They won't print the Mohammed cartoons. Will they print the Iranian ones?
Posted by: Oyster at February 09, 2006 06:57 AM (YudAC)
6
We know by now that elections are a necessary but certainly not sufficient condition for producing free, stable societies. If you were to let a class-room of seven-year-olds vote on how they should be allowed to run their lives, you know the result. They would end school, legislate for compulsory chocolate and ice-cream, liberalise fussy rules on TV-watching and computer-game playing and institute a more relaxed approach to bedtime.
If you give the vote to a few million Palestinians in their current state, they will vote for the equivalent of chocolate, TV and ice-cream. They will endorse the annihilation of Israel, the mass murder of Americans and a holy war against infidels everywhere.
That's not to say that Palestinians have puerile minds. But in political-historical-cultural terms they are like children. They have been conditioned entirely for decades by an environment of repression and poverty, pushed around by corrupt leaders poisoning their minds with hateful bile for decades and decades.
That's why the US is surly right to force the pace of democratic change in the region. Fomenting a political revolution in the Middle East is the only real way to the world's long-term security.
Posted by: Paul -uk- at February 09, 2006 07:52 AM (PM/BC)
7
Holocaust cartoons would offend me. Any one mocking the Holocaust would offend me. They SHOULD offend any reasonable person.
There is a big difference between mocking a public figure and between mocking millions of average people who died at the hands of the Nazis.
Offended or no, freedom must include the freedom to be offended. Even when such offenses are disgusting and immoral.
Also, if a Newspaper offends the proper recourse is to boycott the newspaper or advertisors in it. My family got rid of the L.A. Times because it was a liberal rag. A rational person does not boycott an entire country for the acts of an individual newspaper.
Posted by: Rusty at February 09, 2006 08:13 AM (JQjhA)
8
"Also, if a Newspaper offends the proper recourse is to boycott the newspaper or advertisors in it. My family got rid of the L.A. Times because it was a liberal rag. A rational person does not boycott an entire country for the acts of an individual newspaper."
Good point. I should adjust my thoughts about this now. While I considered their boycott of Danish products a reasonable reaction and while they are free to do so, I realize that maybe it's not so reasonable at all.
Posted by: Oyster at February 09, 2006 08:50 AM (sMLtC)
9
Oyster, it's not reasonable, but it is a hell of a lot better than murder and mayhew, that's for sure. And a boycott passes for rational behavior in the cesspool of the ME and Muslim-dominated ...nations, for lack of a better word.
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 09, 2006 10:11 AM (rUyw4)
10
That's true too JJ. And if I had to make a choice between a national boycott and bombings, I guess you know which I'd take. Rusty's point is still valid in thinking it through.
It seems these people only behave in degrees of unreasonablness rather than entertain the idea that there might be an actual "right way" to do something. If the idea is to boycott all Danish products, it kinda puts a crimp in the buying practices or the export of goods of Muslims in Denmark doesn't it? They don't think things through to their logical conclusion. They could be bankrupting a Muslim owned dairy in Denmark who exports to the Middle East. Or a Muslim cheese manufacturer.
The Danish ham business shouln't be in much of a pinch because they don't buy those anyway. On the other hand, the Danish flag business is probably booming!
Posted by: Oyster at February 09, 2006 11:51 AM (sMLtC)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Wow
Thank you all so
very much for your support.
I'm not alone in this, so if you can spare a moment, say a nice thing or two for her.
And, if you're an imam, throw her a fatwa. After all, since we're married, and you're an imam, all of her property is mine, right?
I now return you to your regularly scheduled intifada.
Posted by: Vinnie at
01:00 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 65 words, total size 1 kb.
Details of NSA Surveillance Coming Soon to a Newspaper Near You
The White House has released highly classified details of the NSA program to intercept communications between terrorists and people within the US.
From the Associated Press via Breitbart.com:
After weeks of insisting it would not reveal details of its eavesdropping without warrants, the White House reversed course Wednesday and provided a House committee with highly classified information about the operation.
When asked what prompted the move to give lawmakers more details, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said the administration has stated "from the beginning that we will work with members of Congress, and we will continue to do so regarding this vital national security program."
But the AP says that pressure from RINOs was the reason:
more...
Posted by: Bluto at
12:02 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 275 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I want credit and a cheezeburger for calling this some time back. The game is afoot starting now for '06 and '08.
Posted by: hondo at February 09, 2006 12:22 AM (3aakz)
2
How did we ever win WW1 and WW2? News took weeks, months and in some cases years to get stateside. Of course there were lots of people worrying about their loved ones, but practically EVERYONE was busy, WINNING the war. None of this wimpy whiny ass hand wringin' and especially about enemies (now TERRORIST PUKES) being tracked. Following the last French bailout, the media has learned how to destroy us, if I had to sum up what passes for concern and a "right to know" in the name of news. AP says RINO, but it's the AP so.....
Posted by: forest hunter at February 09, 2006 12:29 AM (Fq6zR)
3
And tomorrow they're sharing highly classified information with the Senate intelligence committee! Oh, the horror! How dare anyone in Congress ask for intelligence oversight?
Posted by: IO ERROR at February 09, 2006 12:30 AM (YVC2I)
4
IO ERROR
They have always been given information of on the overall program - some tend to forget.
What they will get now (which is extremely unusual) is detailed specifics on specific cases (their successes I grant you) - which will in turn somehow manage to be leaked to the MSM & general public.
Posted by: hondo at February 09, 2006 12:40 AM (3aakz)
5
IO ERROR - hondo is essentially correct, except for where hondo says "detailed specifics" read: "rope to hang themselves with".
forest hunter: "RINO" was my word.
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at February 09, 2006 02:14 AM (RHG+K)
6
IO ERROR, before you get your panties in a wad, read up a little on WWII. Particularly do a google on "enigma" and "purple". Ponder what effects the leaking of that information would have had on the war effort. Perhaps then you will understand why some (ie: anyone with half a brain) are livid that these details are being provided to a group that leaks like a collander which has been used for shotgun target practice...
Posted by: Cybrludite at February 09, 2006 05:02 AM (XFoEH)
7
Yep, Hondo's right. There HAS been Congressional oversight. There was a committee selected for this, as in every other aspect of government there are oversight committees. And these committees are comprised of those on both sides of the aisle out of fairness. However, this is a little more sensitive to national security that picking a judge or haggling over which taxes to raise. Revealing sensitive details of this program to them is akin to mapping out troop positions in the Middle East. Pelosi had better tread very carefully. I trust her less than anyone on the committee.
Posted by: Oyster at February 09, 2006 05:14 AM (YudAC)
8
The Dread Pundit Bluto
Sorry bout that! I promise to you use both eyes in the future. This is me walking out on a diseased limb with a sack of spuds attached to a safety line in the hand of my Ex-wife and in her other, a saw. Love you baby ! Thanx for the triiiiiiiiiip!
RINO means?
Posted by: forest hunter at February 10, 2006 09:31 PM (Fq6zR)
9
You guys are forgetting to spit your tobacco juice. Do you think terrorists are so stupid that they don't know they are being listened to? Of course not. The secrecy was to keep the American people from knowing our dear elected officials are illegally spying on us!
Posted by: Joe at February 12, 2006 09:14 AM (1QjKa)
10
There's a lawful way to
compel the Congress to
investigate, even if they don't want to, or are convinced "they don't need to": [
Click ]
Posted by: Constant at February 15, 2006 10:13 PM (ZZCJg)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 08, 2006
Unpaid Taxes
(Boston) Here's today's tip. If you plan on running for public office, try to pay your taxes.
From Myway.com:
Marie St. Fleur was a candidate for lieutenant governor for less than 24 hours before she had to drop out over unpaid taxes and student loans, leaving voters to ask how a key player in crafting the state budget could make such a mess of her own checkbook.
It is a question Massachusetts voters have asked themselves before.
Massachusetts, dubbed "Taxachusetts" years ago for its tax-happy ways, seems to churn out scofflaw lawmakers unable or unwilling to pay their own taxes on time.
St. Fleur, a state lawmaker who is the vice chairwoman of the budget-writing House Ways and Means Committee, was late in repaying $40,000 in federally backed student loans, failed to pay automobile excise taxes in 2005, and had a $12,711 tax lien placed against her by the IRS.
In fairness to Rep. St. Fleur, not paying taxes seems to be common among Massachusetts lawmakers so she's not unique in that regard. In fact, voters complain that lawmakers in Massachusetts only know how to raise taxes, not pay them.
However, Rep.St. Fleur had a novel explanation for why she didn't pay her taxes. She indicated that "she did not file because she had received a death threat and had to hire bodyguards, leaving her with no money to pay her taxes."
Evidently, if one lives in the Bay State and receives a fatwa, prevailing logic is that a person can avoid paying taxes. Strangely, I fail to see anything odd about death threats and unpaid taxes being related. Death and taxes -- just like peas and carrots.
From Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
10:57 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 282 words, total size 2 kb.
1
What a beeeuuuteefool reason! I wonder if she said it with a straight face. It's a given she's a dhimmi, based on the "perfect" excuse. Say, she's not Dirty Harry's kinfolk is she? That would explain the death threats. Well in your case miss uh (I just looked again-Oh Christ another French name) St. Fleur of Taxachusetts we'll make an exception cause you, you, you....cut to BJ Clintons quote"It depends on what the definition of "is" is. Tax is due . Oh I thought they meant taxis and is is in there and I is so confused, cause you know them death threats is coming.....
Posted by: forest hunter at February 09, 2006 12:03 AM (Fq6zR)
2
She's one of those "do as I say, not as I do" type of Liberals.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 09, 2006 01:05 AM (8e/V4)
3
It's not her fault, Whitey was keeping her down.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 09, 2006 04:33 AM (0yYS2)
4
It's no wonder people are fleeing MA in droves. The sad thing is that many are coming here to Florida and some of them still can't seem to make the connection between their voting practices and the mess their state is in. If they start screwing up Florida, I might have to move back to Texas. Florida is one of only a handful of states without a state income tax. I'd like to keep it that way.
Posted by: Oyster at February 09, 2006 05:21 AM (YudAC)
5
You forgot to mention the fact that she was pushing for "tuition breaks" for illegal aliens while legal out of state residents have to pay full price for an education in MA. While she is a "naturalized citizen" from Haiti who owes tens of thousands in student loans, doesn't pay her taxes, has several liens and foreclosures and wants us to pick up the tab for her and every other illegal in the state. But according to our AG who is running for Gov. she the perfect choice for Lt. Gov.
Posted by: Nick at February 09, 2006 07:48 AM (OqZ3M)
6
>>>But according to our AG who is running for Gov. she the perfect choice for Lt. Gov.
Of course she is. She's a Liberal Democrat female African American cripple. Given she's from Haitin, it's likely she has AIDS. Perfect.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 09, 2006 08:14 AM (8e/V4)
7
And, let us not forget Kennedy and Kerry and all the other liberal Democrats. I have to wonder if the voters in Massachusetts will ever come to their senses.
Posted by: Mike at February 09, 2006 09:13 AM (rsE8d)
8
"I have to wonder if the voters in Massachusettes will ever come to their senses."
Let's see. The voters of Massachusettes elected Ted Kennedy and John Kerry numerous times. Hell man, the people of Massachusettes never had any sense to come to.
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 09, 2006 10:18 AM (rUyw4)
9
JJ
They have come to their senses. The only state I believe with decling popluation. People vote with their feet. Where one goes, you can bet there are 9 others who wish they could follow - but homes, mortgag*, jobs stuff like that prevents walking out that easily.
This does however stengthen the Kennedy's and Kerry's.
Posted by: hondo at February 09, 2006 12:05 PM (3aakz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Academic Freedom (Except to Criticize Islam)
Guest commentary by Inigo Montoya: Freedom. You keep using that word. I do not think it means, what you think it means.
American professor fired for showing cartoons to students in UAE. Here is the money quote:
Shaikh Nahyan emphasised that there is freedom of opinion and expression in the UAE, as well as academic freedom enjoyed by all educational institutions, but what happened in Zayed University does not relate, in any sense, to any relevant concept of freedom.
In all honestly, it's not like American universities are much more free.
Posted by: Rusty at
04:39 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 102 words, total size 1 kb.
1
If there is no freedom to criticize Islam, there is no freedom. Simple, that!
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 08, 2006 06:05 PM (rUyw4)
2
JJ there is freedom to criticize islam, it's just that a billion people don't like it. Sticks and stones etc, except when talking about muslims; they are superior to us if we are to believe their preachings.
Posted by: Jester at February 08, 2006 06:39 PM (2FYdV)
3
Hmmmph! Yeah, well, I don't believe their teachings, and frankly, why should I? They come to the West from their hellholes and want to tell us what to say or do. My answer is for Muslims to go back to the hellholes they came from. It wouldn't take the deportment of 100 of these guys before we heard them singing a different tune. I'll bet you on that.
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 08, 2006 06:48 PM (rUyw4)
4
Offcourse there is freedom of speech in the Middle East, they are also free to criticise, insult and mock all other religions.
They are also free to call jews and americans, pigs and/or apes.
I'm surprised that there are female students in the UAE, oh my, things have changed, Arab women have brains, they are allowed to learn, truly shocking.
Posted by: MathewK at February 08, 2006 07:29 PM (pVHqF)
5
Another paradox of this ongoing - how to say this - educational bias/prejudice. If one wishes to gain access to gainful employment, it has been/will be required to have spent considerable time and money in these American Universities. For without the entitlement granted in exchange for the substantial financial support contributed to these brainwashing specialists, the employment options narrow to a disparaging level. The option to feed the Jaba's at the top and everywhere in between seems non-existent.
Posted by: forest hunter at February 08, 2006 07:49 PM (Fq6zR)
6
Check it out guys, apparently the cartoons were published in Eygpt in Oct 2005, with no reaction from anyone, also the newspaper running the holocaust cartoons already has pictures of Mo on its website, so much for not having pictures of him.
http://egyptiansandmonkey.blogspot.com/2006/02/boycott-egypt.html
http://www.hamshahri.org/vijenam/javan/1384/841115/panke3.htm
Posted by: MathewK at February 08, 2006 10:56 PM (pVHqF)
7
Shall we burn the Egyptian embassy down? Or should we demand they burn their own down? I mean, fair's fair, right?
Posted by: Oyster at February 09, 2006 05:26 AM (YudAC)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
155kb generated in CPU 0.1038, elapsed 0.2135 seconds.
135 queries taking 0.1865 seconds, 462 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.