mypetjawa v. 2.0 (beta) "<i>Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to ev

January 31, 2006

If Ted Kennedy Was in Animal House....

...as Bluto Blutarsky.

Posted by: Rusty at 08:06 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 17 words, total size 1 kb.

Kos Kids Reaction to Failed Alito Filibuster

THIS is how it happened in Nazi Germany, Its over.

More.

UPDATE: I'm registering Independent tomorrow. You're welcome to join me.

Even more.

Posted by: Rusty at 08:03 AM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.

Iran Will Face UN Security Council

The five permanent Security Council members have directed the International Atomic Energy Agency to remand Iran's case to them. From Reuters:

The foreign ministers from China, Russia, the United States, France and Britain as well as Germany and the European Union, said after a dinner in London that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) must decide to bring Iran's case before the Council when the agency meets on Thursday in Vienna.
A senior U.S. official said the statement meant Russia and China were now on board with the United States and the European powers that there must be strong action taken by the IAEA in Vienna to discourage Tehran from pursuing atomic research which could enable the country to build a nuclear bomb.
"This is the most powerful message we could have hoped for," said a senior U.S. official, who said the discussions over dinner had been animated.

Not, of course, that anything's going to happen right away:

British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said the ministers shared serious concerns about Iran's nuclear programs and agreed that an extensive period of "confidence-building" was required from Iran.
The Council could ultimately impose sanctions against Iran but there are many steps before this could happen.

The question is, how will Ahmanidejad and the mullahs react? And will the UN be any better at enforcing its edicts than it was with Saddam Hussein?

Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.

Posted by: Bluto at 12:10 AM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 249 words, total size 2 kb.

January 30, 2006

The Emperor's Clothes

OK, I'll just get this second post in under the wire if I'm lucky. And I wouldn't even bother were it not for the fact that I think the state of academia is important to the emergence of a New Liberalism (in the classic anti-statist sense). A friend of mine at the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions posted the following link to an article in Inside Higher Education that's about the details of a rather smarmy movement. I mean you really have to keep your wits about you to suss out what these folks actually intend, which is the educational establishment equivalent of selling a bullet-to-the-head as a cure for migraines. Excerpting:
more...

Posted by: Demosophist at 11:31 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 588 words, total size 4 kb.

All The Mahomet That's Fit To Print

Via email from Patrick al-Kafir who found it at the blog-grandfather:

Zombietime's Mohammed image archive.

While the debate rages, an important point has been overlooked: despite the Islamic prohibition against depicting Mohammed under any circumstances, hundreds of paintings, drawings and other images of Mohammed have been created over the centuries, with nary a word of complaint from the Muslim world. The recent cartoons in Jyllands-Posten are nothing new; it's just that no other images of Mohammed have ever been so widely publicized.

Note the images purchased off the street in Iran.

In 1999.

Man, wait 'til the Islamofascists see this. It'll be boycott city, baby!

Posted by: Vinnie at 11:21 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 119 words, total size 1 kb.

So, I Ain't No Freakin' Demigod

Rusty wrote nine posts today. Count 'em... 9. Oy. Which makes him the Blogging Demigod or Buddha or something. (Not as though I can keep track of that metaphysical stuff, mind you.) About all I can manage, in the midst of the maelstrom, are a few anemic bullet points:

* What made Hamas a threat was the fact that they provided "social services," suggesting that if their capacity to do the same is subsidized by the EU, etc., they'll just get more radical and more threatening. I mean, if bears do you-know-what in the woods.

* Zawahiri is only pretending to be a lapdog of the Western Left. Every ounce of his understanding of Marxist Theory is secondhand, through Qutb... so he's basically a Dentist with a Hammer. But, of course, no one really gives a hoot because he's such a charming thug.

* No one really knows how the Iran Dilemma will be resolved, which suggests that everything is actually just fine. I'd worry if it appeared MSM weren't typically clueless.

* Alito kicks ass.

I'll nuance these themes later, and apologize for the fact that I'm so seldom present (in comparison to the Blogging Buddha).

Posted by: Demosophist at 10:16 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 209 words, total size 1 kb.

Alito Filibuster Defeated, 72-25

Despite semi-coherent bluster from Senator Teddy Kennedy (how can anyone from Massachusetts stand the embarrassment of being represented by this blivit?), the vote for cloture on debate of the Alito nomination has passed. Certainly, this will be much to the consternation of the Left's lunatic fringe, which spent the weekend harrassing Senators in an attempt to garner support for a filibuster.

I'll let Cartman express my feelings to the moonbats.

Cartman: Yes! Yesss!! Oh, let me taste your tears, Libs! Mm, your tears are so yummy and sweet.

Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.

Posted by: Bluto at 07:36 PM | Comments (13) | Add Comment
Post contains 107 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Final vote due soon - my 72-28 looking gooooood!

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 07:39 PM (3aakz)

2 You're a genius, hondo!

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 07:45 PM (rUyw4)

3 Dunno, hondo, several of the Dems said that they would vote for cloture, but against confirmation.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at January 30, 2006 07:54 PM (RHG+K)

4 Its not the final actual vote yet - never get ahead of yourself - there's always room for Murphy's Law.

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 08:01 PM (3aakz)

5 >>>"Dunno, hondo, several of the Dems said that they would vote for cloture, but against confirmation." "Several" aint gonna cut it. Alito's as good as in. I was over at Kos a few hours ago "tasting" their tears. So sweeeet!

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 30, 2006 08:11 PM (8e/V4)

6 I don't see why you'd want to ban this moron. He's our best argument against muslim immigration. You should keep him around as exhibit A.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 30, 2006 08:58 PM (8e/V4)

7 >>>"I'm Catholic" That's a frightening thought. Ok, so why are you posting that garbage here? There are a billion blogs on the net, why are you haunting this one? Just curious.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 30, 2006 10:06 PM (8e/V4)

8 Is this Allito thing still all about abortion? I mean, they aren't even taking it away, they just want the children to have their parents consent. My god, you can't even get a beer or a pack of cigs at 17...why should you be able to decide on a major medical procedure? And while I'm on the subject...how come there's always like a million lesbians in front of abortion clinics...this has nothing to do with you...don't get me wrong...I like lesbians...but, you sleep with other women...that's the part I like!

Posted by: Bob at January 30, 2006 10:23 PM (EKMxC)

9 The boat to political irrelevancy is boarding, and the libtards are stampeding the gangplank. These are good time.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 30, 2006 10:56 PM (0yYS2)

10 I'm changing my final guess to 61-39. Hondo, you underestimate these ideologues on the left side of the aisle. Did anyone catch Kennedy blowing a gasket on the senate floor yesterday? It was drama at its acme. And Dingy Harry spent 20 minutes browbeating Bush making him sound worse than Foulmood Almondjeans and preaching doom and gloom. You could almost see black clouds and lightning forming over his head. Who needs soap operas when we have CSPAN?

Posted by: Oyster at January 31, 2006 05:29 AM (YudAC)

11 You smell that? Do you smell that? ...Liberal tears, son. Nothing else in the world smells like that. I love the smell of Liberal tears in the morning. The smell, you know that gasoline smell, the whole Senate. Smelled like... VICTORY. ...

Posted by: Brad at January 31, 2006 08:15 AM (BJYNn)

12 Good times, good times.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 31, 2006 10:10 AM (0yYS2)

13 ioezhab exiuqsjiuo

Posted by: Evan at February 27, 2006 07:33 PM (RaXUk)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

The Blog Sabbath Caption Contest: Endorsed By Jimmy Carter Edition

******FATWAS ISSUED******

Caption this photo of ~~Ham Ass~~ Hamas "political leader" Khaleed Said Salaam Shaheed Abdul ibn Fahd Derka Derka Mohammed Jihad Smith giving a speech to someone somewhere:

IMPORTANT NOTE: Entries containing the words "death," "to," or "Israel" will be automatically disqualified. C'mon peeps, there has to some challenge to this.

Fatwas will be issued when Mr. Venom submits an entry complaining that no fatwas have been issued.

Or Monday evening, before the new episode of 24, of course.

Fatwas issued! Man, this gets harder every week. These Islamotards are great for caption contests, eh wot?

Double fatwa with cheese, super-sized with a diet Coke:

"And then we're going to Syria, and we're going to Lebanon, and we're going to Yemen. Yeeeeaaaaarrrrrrgggghhhh!" - Steven L.

Fatwas:

"We need one more couple for the Virginia Reel!" - J Rob

"OH MY GOD!!!...Its Godzillaaaaa!!!!!.....WUN!!! WUN!!! Wun For youre lives!!!" - Thanos35

"Arafat! Pull my finger!" - Leovinius

Honorable mention fatwa for Star Wars reference:

"That's not a moon, it's a space station!" - Lawhawk

Gratuitous honorable mention so he doesn't fling poo at his owners:

"I am number one!
Number two is on my other hand." - Spacemonkey

And speaking of fatwas, how about another posting of the Danish caricatures of Mohammed under the fold!

Go ahead, suckers, boycott me!! more...

Posted by: Vinnie at 06:04 PM | Comments (50) | Add Comment
Post contains 239 words, total size 2 kb.

Another Jill Carrol Hostage Video Emerges

jill.carroll.aljazeera.second.hostage.video.jpg UPDATE 2/09/06: Third Jill Carroll hostage video here.

Scroll through for updates or check the MAIN PAGE here or our pages dedicated exclusively to Jill Carroll for the latest news on Jill Carroll and other hostages in Iraq.
----------
Disturbing news that al Jazeera has released yet another Jill Carroll video. This time, the massogonistic terrorists force Ms. Carroll to cover her head. Sickening.

UPDATE: While we continue to search for the unedited video, you can see the al Jazeera broadcast here (see right side of screen). As further evidence of al Jazeera's objectively pro-terrorist stance, anti-Americanism, and lies, earlier reports by the station itself that no audio were shown are not true. Al Jazeera does let this bit of audio slip by in the background:

their own government [inaudible] Iraq...let these people go home to their families

Undoubtedly a reference to the female Iraqi prisoners.

Roy Hallums, a hostage liberated by U.S. troops, related that when his terrorist captors wanted him to cry on his video, they first beat him. They said they wanted his tears to look 'believable'.

We pray for Jill Carroll's immediate release and for divine retribution to visit her captors. Hopefully in the form of the unpleasent end of an M16.

Al Jazeera:

Jill Carroll, the kidnapped US journalist, has appeared in a new video on Aljazeera, weeping and appealing for the release of women Iraqi prisoners.
The video, aired by Aljazeera on Monday, shows Carroll wearing a veil and weeping.

The video had no sound, but Aljazeera said she appealed for the release of women Iraqi prisoners. [Ed note: this is a deliberate falsehood on al Jazeera's part. Al Jazeera edited out most of Jill Carroll's pleas, but not a bit asking for the release of female prisoners]
Carroll is visibly crying in the video and wears a veil as she speaks to the camera. The footage has a time signature with the date 28 January.

Aljazeera's newscaster said in the video Carroll appeals to the US military and the Iraqi Interior Ministry to release all women in their prisons and that this "would help in winning her release".

More information and background about the Jill Carroll hostage situation can be found here.

UPDATE: Come to think of it, this is VERY good news. Jill Carroll's captors had given the U.S. a 72 hour deadline to release female prisoners in Iraq. That deadline expired 8 days before this film was time stamped. While it is still possible that her life is being threatened, the fact that they've let at least two deadlines pass without (apparently) harming her is a sign that perhaps their threats are idle.

Posted by: Rusty at 03:37 PM | Comments (74) | Add Comment
Post contains 418 words, total size 4 kb.

1 I'm not to sure what to make of the veil, she has in the past worn them willingly: http://www.here-now.org/content/2006/01/10/0110reporter100.jpg You know the 'radical' Islam types though, they were probably worried her hairstyle would give them a woody. Let's hope for her safe return.

Posted by: dave at January 30, 2006 03:43 PM (CcXvt)

2 Amen Rusty, the poor woman. Those bastards have not one ounce of humanity.

Posted by: Howie at January 30, 2006 03:44 PM (D3+20)

3 So why does al-jazeera leave out the sound? Seems like an effort to soften the video to me. Can any one else think of a reason her sobs were left out other than to show the terrorists slime in the best possible light.

Posted by: Howie at January 30, 2006 03:48 PM (D3+20)

4 I wonder what the ACLU has to say about this?

Posted by: Brad at January 30, 2006 03:49 PM (3OPZt)

5 They stopped running the sound shortly after the Polish hostage crisis. Remember that? The Arab world was outraged that al Jazeera ran that woman's sobs on the air. It made Muslims look like savages. Imagine that.

Posted by: Rusty at January 30, 2006 03:53 PM (JQjhA)

6 Savages indeed.

Posted by: Howie at January 30, 2006 04:03 PM (D3+20)

7 Seems like you should learn your lesson, but then again idiots never learn from their lesson. Free the Muslims all around the world.

Posted by: Abdul Wali at January 30, 2006 04:18 PM (lDj8F)

8 "Let me put it this way, you wimp: I DARE YOU to kill her!" -- Danny DeVito, "Ruthless People" http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091877/

Posted by: mojo at January 30, 2006 04:20 PM (U9foz)

9 The scary thing about Abdul Wali, is that he is in Lutton, U.K. You'd expect this kind of reaction from Saudi Arabia, but not a Briton. Traitor.

Posted by: Rusty at January 30, 2006 04:23 PM (JQjhA)

10 It's sad that someone almost "on their side" is being used in this exploitative way. Let's hope they turn her loose and that she smartens up.

Posted by: youngbourbonprofessional at January 30, 2006 04:29 PM (tdhAh)

11 Yes, free those Muslims who think for themselves and enslave them in the idology of jihad and salafacism. They should only think and feel what the prophet who married a nine-year old girl says for them to think. That will surely improve their lot in life.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 04:29 PM (rUyw4)

12 Abdul Wali, the NSA read your Hotmail.

Posted by: dave at January 30, 2006 04:36 PM (CcXvt)

13 We should all email him to be sure he qualifies.

Posted by: Howie at January 30, 2006 04:37 PM (D3+20)

14 Even with the sound off, the impact of those images is not diminished. I pray that she makes it out unharmed. I also pray that her captors, the people who Abdul Wali holds in such high esteem are quickly taken into custody, using mops, buckets and a pressure washer or two. Unfortunately there is no shortage of Abdul-esque types polluting the UK and elsewhere with their presence.

Posted by: Graeme at January 30, 2006 04:48 PM (+JGk2)

15 Ah but the Sith Master Paduan Jawa is on the case. You are banned so go away. M came back

Posted by: Howie at January 30, 2006 04:49 PM (D3+20)

16 Hey, Abdul Wali. Mohammad is the false prophet and Allah is his Beast. See you in hell.

Posted by: MandM at January 30, 2006 04:50 PM (/lpvu)

17 He will keep this up till his hands are too sticky - just ignore - he will past.

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 04:59 PM (3aakz)

18 This most recent kidnapping is further proof that Islam is a fundamentally de-humanising religion. The West should take the opportunity to act decisively against Iran's nuclear program and drop nuclear bombs on Iran. Abdul Wali: would that not free millions of muslims to become Shaheed and have 72 virgins? Your culture and religion sucks, and your odour could be much improved (by lethal radiation).

Posted by: seeker at January 30, 2006 05:06 PM (BNseL)

19 Weren't the Iraqi women prisoners released last weekend as scheduled? Or at least a number of them?

Posted by: MOG at January 30, 2006 05:16 PM (ClGDj)

20 MOG, Five of a total of eight were released. Which seems strange that in a country of 25 million only 3 women would have ties to the insurgency.

Posted by: Rusty at January 30, 2006 05:17 PM (JQjhA)

21 Deliberately editing out the sound! If that isn't the most blatant and amaturish form of tampering I've seen in a long time - then I don't know what is. So, is it going to be available to the MSM unedited? Does the MSM have any comment on this piece of work on the part of their esteemed fellow journalists?

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 05:25 PM (3aakz)

22 Are those hands sticky yet?

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 05:30 PM (3aakz)

23 MikeeUSA: Do you have anger issues?

Posted by: youngbourbonprofessional at January 30, 2006 05:36 PM (tdhAh)

24 Jesusland Joe, E-mail me when you get a chance. Rusty.

Posted by: Rusty at January 30, 2006 05:48 PM (JQjhA)

25 Look at her. She's all dhimmified. But hey, it doesn't compare to "Pat Robertson".

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 30, 2006 06:11 PM (8e/V4)

26 Start handing out death sentences to all of the terrorists in custody. Start up their trials and upon finding them guilty of terrorism, SENTENCE THEM TO DEATH AND PUBLICLY EXECUTE THEM! KILL THEM ALL DAMN IT!

Posted by: Andre at January 30, 2006 06:16 PM (bQ3vG)

27 It shouldn't be long now before muslims start disappearing in civilized countries. Of course then, they'll scream about their rights and such. We're just going to have to exterminate them like the vermin they are.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 30, 2006 06:24 PM (0yYS2)

28 MikeeUSA, what a complete moron you are.

Posted by: Oyster at January 30, 2006 06:30 PM (YudAC)

29 Mikee, so you're using a fake IP. WOW! you must be so impressed with yourself. moron.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 30, 2006 06:36 PM (8e/V4)

30 Mikee you are just another in a long line of fools; I see you are the moron for January. This hostage taking has to stop. I wonder why we can't plant trained people with tracking devices under their skin to be kidnapped, then send in the troops. It might take a while but after wiping out a few insurgent cells the muslims would probably turn chicken and lessen their attempts at abducting westerners.

Posted by: Jester at January 30, 2006 06:48 PM (QKZX5)

31 jill carroll is in real danger. her pain socks me right in the heart. hellums may have been beaten to induce tears, i fear carroll has been raped. a word about the missing audio though. is it possible that this is the one thing that al jazeera will cooperate with the authorities on? my understanding is that this is standard procedure for hostage situations to reduce false leads and controll for misinfo. al jazeera may be doing this not nessesarily at the u.s.'s request, but at the request of the quatar government, who have divided loyalties. another point, i don't believe their threats are idle. they may mke her execution part of the jihadist response to the sotu or are otherwise hoping to affix added signifigance to it. the taking of a woman and using her captivity to demand the release of women prisoners seems to me to be an act of premeditated symbolism. the "peace" activists in iraq, i'm certain, are advising them well also, improbulus maximus does not speak for me any more than a robert scheer or a cindy sheehan, and i reject his creepy, eliminationist reaction in the strongest terms.

Posted by: jummy at January 30, 2006 06:54 PM (kGfOr)

32 It's very sad. My understanding is that the woman is a liberal and was in Iraq reporting from basically an anti-American perspective. What we're seeing, sadly, is the reality of a liberal getting her wake-up call to the reality of the world. The world is not a place of sweetness and light where all cultures are equal and everything is relative and "context" is all-important. These Muslims couldn't care less about context and relativity and equality. They just want to saw off the heads of people who don't submit to them. And this poor liberal woman is finding this out the hard way. God Bless and keep her, I hope she is delivered to safety.

Posted by: MarkJ at January 30, 2006 07:23 PM (HECm6)

33 MikeeUSA going bye bye please stand by......

Posted by: Howie at January 30, 2006 07:38 PM (D3+20)

34 Stinky hands are the devil's mono-playground.

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 07:41 PM (3aakz)

35 Do some research about an Eyptian hostage who escaped after his hostage video was filmed. He claimed that a stringer who worked with Al Jazeera helped direct the hostage video prior to its filming. It might just be one of the many rumors floating around Iraq, but on two other occasions Al Jazeera was accused of paying protesters to riot against Americans, and another time they interviewed militants trucked in to an IED bombing to rail against Americans while the Iraq who lived in the house two doors down claimed he had never seen them before. The sad fact is, without the public distribution outlet Al Jazeera provides terrorists, many of these kidnappings would either not take place, or would be settled financially in a matter of days.

Posted by: Anon at January 30, 2006 07:57 PM (UxviT)

36 Rusty, I sent you an e-mail at 6:00pm. Have not heard from you yet. It's under heat Aaron.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 10:16 PM (rUyw4)

37 I truly hope Jill is safe and everything is OK. But, I hate myself when I say it, but, I just get the strongest feeling someone is trying to sell me a newspaper...

Posted by: Bob at January 30, 2006 10:36 PM (EKMxC)

38 Why don't we just start knocking off those precious Iraqi women terrorists in our custody, unless they let her free? We should start our videos by having the Iraqi detainees eating bacon or something. Filthy savages, with their backward culture, such as it is.

Posted by: benno at January 30, 2006 10:40 PM (tXsgc)

39 I'm not sure I'm ready to agree with offing unarmed women...but, I like the eating bacon video idea! How about Clinton, a cigar, a veiled muslim chick eating bacon?

Posted by: Bob at January 30, 2006 11:13 PM (EKMxC)

40 With the caption "I never porked that woman"

Posted by: Bob at January 30, 2006 11:16 PM (EKMxC)

41 I think the story would be much fuller if it were explained why women are being held by the US. This might be able to either justify the captivity of the Iraqi women by the US or show that their captivity is unjustified. This would in no way justify the terrorists' tactics, but would explain their position. I pray for the release of Jill and the release of all unjustly imprisoned people.

Posted by: Jason at January 30, 2006 11:29 PM (eLgNA)

42 It's sad that someone almost "on their side" is being used in this exploitative way. Let's hope they turn her loose and that she smartens up. Posted by: youngbourbonprofessional at January 30, 2006 04:29 PM She wasn't on the terrorists' side. She was on the side of honest law abiding Iraqis that want freedom. GD it! This most recent kidnapping is further proof that Islam is a fundamentally de-humanising religion. The West should take the opportunity to act decisively against Iran's nuclear program and drop nuclear bombs on Iran. Abdul Wali: would that not free millions of muslims to become Shaheed and have 72 virgins? Your culture and religion sucks, and your odour could be much improved (by lethal radiation). Posted by: seeker at January 30, 2006 05:06 PM seeker, you sound like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. http://www.president.ir/eng/

Posted by: Jason at January 30, 2006 11:42 PM (eLgNA)

43 Jason Of course the US & the Iraqi govt are unjustly imprisoning Iraqi women! For what reason? - none of course - but don't put it past those evil Americans to be using them for comfort girlees! This will of course 'explain" the actions of the "alleged" terrorists to you for your satisfaction. Clearly America has commited a crime against islam and must pay - so - sorry Jill Carrol - you are available. Jason can now feel better - and fake his concern and blame your death on America. BTW Jason - There is now a new job opening for a journalist in Iraq - you might like it - you write well enough - get out - meet the people - maybe come to understand them - get the truth out about the evil American Occupation. I'm sure they will welcome you with open arms.

Posted by: hondo at January 31, 2006 12:10 AM (3aakz)

44 ... and a videocamera.

Posted by: hondo at January 31, 2006 12:12 AM (3aakz)

45 "I think the story would be much fuller if it were explained why women are being held by the US. This might be able to either justify the captivity of the Iraqi women by the US or show that their captivity is unjustified." You don't really believe the kidnappers care one whit why these women are being detained - do you?

Posted by: Oyster at January 31, 2006 05:41 AM (YudAC)

46 The only difference between martyrdom and suicide bombers (or as i like to refer to them 'murderers for mohammed') is the press coverage.

Posted by: ibiubu at January 31, 2006 06:24 AM (qqbUc)

47 RE: Jill Carroll There's an old saying that a conservative is a liberal who's been mugged. If she makes it out alive, I wonder what she'll think of the poor widdle terrorists, er, freedom fighters. God grant that she is returned home safely.

Posted by: docjim505 at January 31, 2006 09:30 AM (MC8cP)

48 Has anyone researched her writing to determine who's side she's actually on?

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 31, 2006 10:09 AM (0yYS2)

49 I'll bet my testicles that she'll be released and go on to praise her kidnappers as perfect gentlemen. She might even pull a Yvonna and convert. She was wayyyy to sympathetic to them to assume she's actually being held against her will.

Posted by: Mus Zibii at January 31, 2006 12:18 PM (JG5R3)

50 Although I don't agree with the Muslim religion, i don't liken to hear Christians and/or Americans saying "The Muslims this.." and "The Muslims that.." We don't have to agree to get along and show love to one another, and I am sure there are plenty of Muslims who agree. If not, well ok then, but I am going to do what Jesus commanded, which is love one another. He didn't say, "unless they are Muslim." Pray for these men to have mercy on Jill. If they don't, pray for her soul to be united with the Lord in Heaven. Hey if you disagree-that is fine with me...

Posted by: RobbieKeane68 at January 31, 2006 01:17 PM (5838u)

51 Hey RobbieKeane68: why don't you go preach those views of yours in Saudi Arabia?

Posted by: dave at January 31, 2006 01:24 PM (CcXvt)

52 Ok, Dave...I'm not much of a preacher, but why is it that having a view is "preaching"? Just like I can have a viewpoint so can anyone else-- I am just saying that hope and peace lies in loving each other. If "over there" I would be beheaded for saying such a crazy thing, then at least I am at peace with how God would feel about it--I still have my hope and peace regardless of what anyone else says or does. Arguing about it, whether with words or with war, is not effective. If love is not effective here on earth, then, OK!

Posted by: RobbieKeane68 at January 31, 2006 01:40 PM (5838u)

53 robbie Nice try at sentimentality - doesn't work given your phony link - safe to assume your phony too - and looking to be coyly provacative with a holier than thou approach.

Posted by: hondo at January 31, 2006 01:47 PM (3aakz)

54 I'M holier than THOU? interesting, but all yours nonetheless. I wouldn't feel so safe in assuming anything. no one is holier than anyone except God, not even you--that is my point about these folks on here going on about "the muslims" when it is not their place to judge or make assumptions..excuse me for having such an outrageous opinion, hondo! what do you mean my link is fake-i didn't even add my link so how can it be fake?

Posted by: RobbieKeane68 at January 31, 2006 01:58 PM (5838u)

55 If you want to drop me a line why don't you write me at {deleted} ...that should be where my "link" takes you..

Posted by: RobbieKeane68 at January 31, 2006 02:13 PM (5838u)

56 Robbie- Dont' give out your addy. And don't worry about them saying you have a fake link. I don't understand much about ISP's and such, but there is a cerain kind that appears to be fake because it changes. Roams, so to speak. Don't get caught up in defending yourself. Make your statement, and let the chips fall.

Posted by: Righty-Tighty at January 31, 2006 02:32 PM (7a66P)

57 ok, R-T-thanks-yeah, i didn't realize about the link thing either-never has come up before. I don't mind anyone writing me- it's not like I give out any of my real info on the net anyway for safety reasons...oh, or that i am so fake! ha.it's cool.

Posted by: RobbieKeane68 at January 31, 2006 02:36 PM (5838u)

58 But you so obviously are.

Posted by: hondo at January 31, 2006 06:10 PM (3aakz)

59 I was very saddened to see Jill crying and suffering in her video. It is good to see that she is still alive. I hope and pray for her safe release to her family. I know the devastation they are feeling with the uncertainty of their sweet Jill. Free Jill and all the hostages in Iraq, Susan new website from Carrie Hallums Cooper hostagefamilymatters.com

Posted by: Susan Hallums at January 31, 2006 07:17 PM (OjS5b)

60 fuck it. fry them faggots. fuck em all

Posted by: poppa at January 31, 2006 08:24 PM (CEvk8)

61 Her writings, her website, indicate she went there to 'crusade' for the 'Iraqi people'... Her sister ran a web site calling her Â“Lady of ArabiaÂ” which suggests Lawrence of Arabia who was well known for his romantic illusions. I ask you... does this quote also reflect a bit of a 'martyr' complex? Â“There are more lucrative ways to work and faster ways to advance a career,Â” she wrote in March 2005 for the American Journalism Review. Â“But just as athletes do it for love of the game, freelancers in Iraq seem to do it for love of the story.Â” She wrote freelance for the Christian Science Monitor articles that were biased towards the 'worsening' situation: Â“The anger and violence have only gotten worse sinceÂ” April 2004, she wrote in AJR, and she specifically mentioned kidnapping as a threat. Like all the collaborators she actively participates and in so doing further reinforces her bona fides guaranteeing her eventual release. But just like previous staged 'events' she did seem to make it pretty easy: Carroll had reportedly been there to interview Adnan al-Dulaimi, the leader of the Iraqi Accordance Front, a Sunni political party. He wasnÂ’t there and she left after waiting between 20 and 30 minutes. According to the driver and witnesses, the gunmen forced the driver to stop, then pulled him out of the car, piled in and drove away with Carroll and her translator, Allan Enwiyah, 32. Â“All together, it didn't take 10 seconds,Â” Carroll's driver told the Washington Post Monday night. Later Saturday, Enwiyah was found dead on the side of a road in Adel, the neighborhood where they were taken. Anybody want to talk about Sunni leaks? This 'abduction' was hushed up because the newsies themselves decided they might be able to 'negotiate'. Or was that collaborate? She will pass the 'Islamic Witch Test' as only the innocent are burned. The guilty are released to burn us...

Posted by: DANEgerus at February 01, 2006 11:33 PM (EcDu5)

62 Wow, interesting comments. It must be nice to have a place where your bigoted and ignorant opinions are encouraged. I don't see any difference between those who want to "nuke Iran" or "kill Iraqi female detainees" and the terrorists holding Jill. You are all the same. Why don't you all go to an island so you can battle it out and leave the rest of us alone!

Posted by: kc at February 06, 2006 02:10 PM (6dAeG)

63 Wow, interesting comments. It must be nice to have a place where your bigoted and ignorant opinions are encouraged. I don't see any difference between those who want to "nuke Iran" or "kill Iraqi female detainees" and the terrorists holding Jill. You are all the same. Why don't you all go to an island so you can battle it out and leave the rest of us alone!

Posted by: c at February 06, 2006 02:11 PM (6dAeG)

64 The problems in the mideast started way before the U.S. From the crusades, to the Abassids, to the Ottoman Turks, WW1 and the breaking of the region into spheres of influence, the U.S. action is of little consequence. The issues run way further than Al Qaida and Iraq...it's a distrust of occupation and colonialism, and this is identified with the West. Few countries in the region accept the existence of Israel, and they hate America for supporting it. (Thanks to Britain and France in their colonial actions). Our military will not transform the region, and Jill Carroll is imply a pawn being used by cowards who believe they are men by kidnapping a woman. We should take care of the terrorists, and then leave for good. Jill Carroll is an American, we should all hope for her release, with the left and right crap aside.

Posted by: Chris at February 07, 2006 03:43 PM (ZVpQt)

65 The prophet has declared this slaves vagina to be used for allah. she is a sex whore. stop saying that liberals dont need to be slaves to allah.

Posted by: waheed at February 08, 2006 03:35 AM (KxPKJ)

66 THIS WHOLE THING IS A SCAM.. SHE IS JUST TRYNG TO GET A MOVIE AND A BOOK DEAL... IF SHE WAS REALLY CAPTURED THEY WOULD OF KILLED HER ALREADY... EITHER KILL HER OR STOP TALKING ABOUT IT... SHE DOESNT SEEM TO WORRIED ABOUT THE WHOLE THING... KILL ALL ARABS

Posted by: AMERICA at February 09, 2006 10:02 AM (t8I9m)

67 SHE COULD EASILY HAVE ARABS OVER THERE SET THIS WHOLE TV THING UP AND TAPE IT WITH NO INTENTIONS ON KILLING HER JUST TO MAKE HER FAMOUS AND GAIN MILLIONS FROM HER STORY WHEN THEY FINALLY RELEASE HER.... HER HEAD WAS SUPPOSE TO BE CUT OFF A MONTH AGO.. WHY IS HER HEAD STILL ATTACHED TO HER SHOULDERS???? WHY???

Posted by: AMERICA at February 09, 2006 10:05 AM (t8I9m)

68 Maybe my eyes are worse than I thought - but in looking at the side by side photos on today's CNN homepage, the two women do not look the same. Look closely at the nose on each of them. Also, the one on the right looks younger. Does anyone else notice that?

Posted by: Marilyn at February 09, 2006 10:53 PM (Y93ys)

69 KILL HER ALREADY... BET THEY WONT CAUSE ITS A SCAM... HOW MANY DEADLINES DO YOU GIVE THE UNITED STATES... SUCH BULLSHIT.. CHOP HER HEAD OFF NOW!!!!! AMERICA IS FULL OF IDIOTS

Posted by: AMERICA at February 10, 2006 03:06 PM (t8I9m)

70 I think that all you muslims are shit. how can you take a woman for a hostage? i cant wait intill we kill you all. rest in peace jill, for having hope.

Posted by: tha usa at February 11, 2006 06:03 PM (QtVWV)

71 Moslems kill each other over a cartoon but when a human being is beheaded not a word is said against it!! Why is the ONE who says you get 42 Virgins when you die for Allah ; Hiding out!! Osama Bin Laden to be specific!! That would show somekind of humanity if they released Jill Carroll!!

Posted by: Garryowen at February 16, 2006 12:07 AM (406FR)

72 That's plain insane. If you think that killing all muslims is the cure---you're an idiot. Jill Carroll is taking the punishment for people like you. Oh, and to the captors....grow some balls. Kidnapping a cute little american girl really isn't that intimidating dumbasses. Let her go.

Posted by: Mikey Fresh at February 16, 2006 11:21 AM (fFre4)

73 WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE THAT WOULD KIDNAP SOMEONE,ESPECIALLY A WOMAN,AND THREATEN TO KILL HER????? SHE WAS THERE TO TELL A FAIR STORY.THERE IS NO WAY SHE CAN DO IT WHEN SHE'S DEAD!!!! TO HER CAPTERS: YOU PEOPLE HAVE AN AGENDA,FINE.BUT, YOU WILL COME ACROSS AS COWARDS,NOT HEROS,IF YOU HARM HER.YOU DON'T HAVE THE BALLS TO "F" WITH OUR MARINES,DO YOU? THEY WOULD PUT A BOOT SO FAR UP YOUR ASS YOU'D BE CHEWING LEATHER!!!!LET HER GO !!!DON'T MAKE THE WHOLE U.S. COME AND "F" YOU UP!!!! JAMES WARREN PROUD AMERICAN....

Posted by: JAMES WARREN at February 26, 2006 10:42 PM (4nZcu)

74 LET HER GO,YOU COWARDS!!!!!!

Posted by: JAMES WARREN at February 26, 2006 10:45 PM (4nZcu)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Danish Paper Caves to Islamic Fascists, Apologizes

The newspaper which carried the originally 'offensive' cartoons has caved. My feeling is that the Danes will never cave. So, continue to buy your Danish pastries, beers, and porn. I'd lay off purchasing the latest copy of Jyllands-Posten, though.

Via Is Full of Crap this from JPOST:

A Danish newspaper on Monday issued an apology to the world's Muslims for publishing caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad that sparked a furor in the Islamic world.
The drawings "were not in violation of Danish law but have undoubtedly offended many Muslims, which we would like to apologize for," the Jyllands-Posten's editor-in-chief Carsten Juste said in a statement posted on the paper's Web site.

Meanwhile the cyber jihad continues with numerous websites that have defended Danish freedom of expression suffering under Denial of Service Attacks.

Posted by: Rusty at 03:25 PM | Comments (27) | Add Comment
Post contains 145 words, total size 1 kb.

1 DDOS? *heh* Not here, pal. Unless Allah can saturate 30+ gigabits with advanced DDOS defenses. I'm Jewish. I'm Texan. I'm Zionist. They already want me dead.

Posted by: Laurence Simon at January 30, 2006 03:31 PM (uBCxH)

2 So why are we not running this cartoon on all our blogs?

Posted by: Filthy Allah at January 30, 2006 03:35 PM (5ceWd)

3 Run the cartoon, Rusty. All day, all night, all the time. Piss on the pedophile prophet. I'm sick of their crap.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 03:36 PM (rUyw4)

4 Note the carefully worded response. They didn't apologize for the cartoons, but they apologized for offending Muslims who were outraged by the cartoons. Since when have we had to apologize for offending people?

Posted by: Chad Evans at January 30, 2006 03:48 PM (+DXHJ)

5 Jyllands Posten may have apologised, but the citizens have not/will not. As a matter of fact, 'free speech' advocates are resisting in many creative ways . . .see http://viking-observer.blogspot.com/2006/01/danish-counter-attacks.html

Posted by: heroyalwhyness at January 30, 2006 03:48 PM (XU9K/)

6 We stand in solidarity with the Danish people and linked to the post you mention here http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/154563.php

Posted by: Rusty at January 30, 2006 03:55 PM (JQjhA)

7 I ran it on mine and here, Filthy.

Posted by: Vinnie at January 30, 2006 04:25 PM (f289O)

8 And you wonder why I sit back and watch on this one.

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 04:34 PM (3aakz)

9 "Going down! Going down, down, down, down" - whoa! and I gave them a week! Let's revisit this story in a couple of days (or hours).

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 05:03 PM (3aakz)

10 I think IÂ’m with Hondo on this one. IÂ’m not from Missouri, but I gotta be showed. Like I said, I would support the Danes if they stood up for themselves. But the paper caving in so early in this struggle is not good news. Rather it reinforces the image I have of a culture that will not stand up for itself because of political correctness. That same paper would run a derogatory cartoon about our President and would never, never apologize. IÂ’m afraid anyone leading this lefty crew of Europeans in the charge is going to look behind himself and find that he is alone. I hope IÂ’m wrong, but I need to see them do a little more fighting for Denmark.

Posted by: Brad at January 30, 2006 05:06 PM (3OPZt)

11 TBAC love americans. We didnÃ‚Â´t even know we had it in us... Or that you had it in you. So thanks for the support guys. Cheers!

Posted by: TCAB at January 30, 2006 05:24 PM (dgZEx)

12 What support? What are you talking about? Who the F*** are you?

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 05:29 PM (3aakz)

13 They didn't completely cave in. What they said is they were sorry for offending Muslims, they never apologised for publishing the cartoons.

Posted by: jonny at January 30, 2006 05:30 PM (nytWC)

14 What time is it?

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 05:37 PM (3aakz)

15 Prayer time for Danes?

Posted by: Brad at January 30, 2006 05:53 PM (3OPZt)

16 It's time for a whuppin.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 30, 2006 06:26 PM (0yYS2)

17 Thanks for posting on this topic. The Danish newspaper which published the original cartoons has been forced to apologize. The Brussels Journal blog which has led the reporting of this attack on free speech is now receiving threats. Given the state of free speech in Europe as evidenced by the Italian "prove Christ existed" case, I expect Brussels Journal to be forced to remove the cartoons and their reporting. To guard against that possibility, I have reposted the cartoons and the Brussels Journal reporting thread on my blog. I urge all bloggers who care about free speech to do the same. See Farenheit 451 Alert

Posted by: pbswatcher at January 30, 2006 06:43 PM (z32ww)

18 Maxie Whup who? Muslims or Danes? Watch the show - get a beer (American) and some popcorn.

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 06:50 PM (3aakz)

19 From a letter from a Dane to Charles at LGF: If you know the story of the Muhammed cartoons, then you would know that the Jyllands-Posten has ALWAYS said it regretted offending muslims feelings. Todays Â“apologyÂ” simply says Â“weÂ’re sorry for hurting your feelingsÂ”, but they do not apologize for publishing the cartoons. Your source is wrong in its understanding of what has happened. Here's a link to the entry: http://tinyurl.com/78b2v I don't think the paper caved over free speech at all: they were simply restating their position, (Nice blog, btw. I found it through LGF.)

Posted by: Anthony (Los Angeles) at January 30, 2006 07:52 PM (rqAqD)

20 This article from FrontPageMag says that a Pakistani Islamic party has put a price on the cartoonist's head. And here I was all set to make with the snark about how progressives were probably going to congratulate the mullahs for not issuing a Rushdie-style fatwa this time.

Posted by: The Sanity Inspector at January 30, 2006 09:47 PM (7U/tM)

21 I think some posters here have it correct... The "apology" was carefully worded... You know, "Dick Durbin Style", as in "I am sorry if I offended any of you who took offense."

Posted by: Son Of The Godfather at January 31, 2006 04:22 AM (maXzk)

22 I guarantee that in a year or two none of you will even remember this non-event. I have forgotten it already. So you can keep your freedom of speech and ram it up your religious asses. Not Interested.

Posted by: Not Interested at January 31, 2006 03:58 PM (uAF2Z)

23 These insulting cartoons were meant to emotionally harm Muslims, which they did and has made the racists/secular fundamentalists on this page happy. It was correct for Muslims to condemn and protest these filthy cartoons. Danes have forgotten manners and common sense. These cartoons have no connection to free speech and will make zero impact on Islam. The whole exercise is a complete waste of time and effort.

Posted by: Aamir Ali at February 01, 2006 11:56 AM (36qks)

24 These insulting cartoons were meant to emotionally harm Muslims, which they did and has made the racists/secular fundamentalists on this page happy. It was correct for Muslims to condemn and protest these filthy cartoons. Danes have forgotten manners and common sense. These cartoons have no connection to free speech and will make zero impact on Islam.

Posted by: Aamir Ali at February 01, 2006 11:56 AM (36qks)

25 I have been reading about these cartoons, but I haven't even been able to find them. Who cares what these people think about some idiot who ran a high fever in the desert and claims to have spoken to God. Poverty and dispare keep this people confused and clinging to a crude religion. We would all be safer and happier without the Koran!

Posted by: kent at February 02, 2006 07:52 PM (/1aP3)

26 Kent, You are so right!. Actually,I would say it a ittle less harshly...it's a tragedy that millions of people have been hoodwinked by Mohammed's game-playing , territory-conquering manipulations. He designed a new "revelation from God" to fit every new thing he personally felt like doing in his quest to seek revenge, and grab land. It's incredible that it has become a major religion, but Nazism was one too. They are actualy rather similar in nature. Mohammed cleary had copies of Jewish and Christian writings, and he obviously repeated/edited them, twisting them to his own self-serving ends. All people would indeed be better off without the Koran , and no one is helped by pretending to be open-minded about it in order not to offend.

Posted by: John at February 03, 2006 08:30 PM (17lnq)

27 Listen you political noobs, here's the distilled ejaculate: There have always been Muslim extremists, just like there have always been Christian extremists. If you gave Pat Robertson $1 billion in arms per year and told him to launch a holy war against all non-christian invaders, you'd end up with a spreading plague of Pat Robertson deciphals armed to the teeth, killing anyone who didn't agree with them or slighted them, spreading their form of totalitarian religious facism (all the while believing more and more that God must be with them since their gains are ever increasing) and keeping moderate Christians (95%)stomped down with intimidation and threats. So what's your point, Wart? Hello! This is EXACTLY what we did in Afghanistan. The CIA, through Pakistan, directly supported the overthrow of the Russian puppet government in Kaboool via huge shipments of arms to whom? Namby-pambi Afghani poppy farmers? No, dumbass, by supporting the extremist jihadis that came from all corners of the globe to kill infidel Rooskies. They networked. They trained at training camps using CIA help. They recruited with powerful messages and promises of virgins (I personally fucked all the virgins in heaven and gave them herpes, so jihadis are all dying for nothing). Then the raggedy Arab bastards won and drove Ivan out of the house! Yes, Allah is great, we won! Look what I said...Allah is great. Not the USA is great for supplying us with arms...Allah supplied us with arms. This is an important distinction, and we were very willing to go along with that Arab delusion in our attempt to camoflage from Russia who was supplying the arms. So, now you've got all these way extreme jihadis from around the planet with noting to do, all networked up, CIA trained and armed to the teeth. Mix well with a helping of Osama and Ayman who have been kicked out of every Arab country that wasn't prepared to accept their brand of extremism, and what do you have? Two sides of the fire triangle, dumbass. And then, what did the USA do? Got pissed off at Pakistan for nuclear arms proliferation and cut off all military and most economic aid. This highly insulted the Arab jihadists. Then we flat left Afghanistan with no government, no aid, no stabilizing force. Thanks Bill Clinton, you cheating cum stain. And guess what, we continued to buy arms for jihadis for several years after the Rooskies left! So ask yourself, what did we win? Well, I doubt that the USSR would have tumbled as soon without getting wiped out in Afghanistan. They still would have fallen as their military spending was even more unsustainable than ours. But now we have jihadis everywhere. What is a mother to do? The answer isn't to hate Muslims and the Koran, although I must say the Sharia law is unsustainable for a modern culture and is by and large a disservice to Islam. 90% of Muslims live in fear of the 10% of extremists, just like if Pat Robertson thugs ruled the Christian world. The Muslim extremists really do believe that they are right, and that anything short of Taliban or Wahabi lifestyle anywhere on the planet is unacceptable. Anywhere. They will call anyone, even fellow Muslims "infidels" if they don't practice the most extreme form of Mullah Omar branded whackoism. Now, in all fairness, we have supported oppressive, elitist, totalitarian, nepotistic Arab oil governments forever. This has done nothing but make the poor in these countries bitter at us, the ones stealing their natural resources and propping up their abusive, oppressive and repressive governments. These disenfranchised A-rab poor are ripe pickings for Wahabi-Talibani-Whackos. "So what is the solution, Oh Well-Read and Wise Uncle Wart? Please tell us what to do so we don't have to think for ourselves." The effort must be manifold my dear, lazy ignoramuses. 1. Get going on an energy policy that will make totalitarian A-rab governments less important to prop-up. Yes fatass, this means you will not be driving that SUV, that you will pay 15% more for an Energy Star home, and we will be burning sawgrass and corn ethanol in our tanks. All along, apply continuous pressure for fair and just elections in oil rich Arab nations while gradually removing our reason for having to prop them up, even if they refuse to change. 2. Fix the Isreal/Palestine problem. Of course, that is not possible with the current Hammas. But eventually Isreal will have to cede most of their West Bank settlements and give up on owning Jerusalem. Jerusalem must become a triumverate Christian, Jewish and Muslim city. 3. Work to assist the disenfranchised in the Muslim world and give them the tools and education they need to succeed or at least not be desperately poor. This is gonna be tough if the A-rab governments aren't changing in unison. 4. Propaganda. We don't use it enough or properly. 5. Eliminate maddrasses everywhere through support for education. The only book used in many of these schools is the Koran, and memorizing all 6666 lines of it is all many of them do-along with preaching extremism and intolerance. No longer will it be legal for male children to only get a madrass education in places like Pakistan. 6. Spies and intelligence. OMG. We are months to years behind in translating Arab intercepts, and have almost no spies in the Muslim world. We need these people to help us prevent extremist flare ups and identify and locate extremist Muslim leaders and 7. Kill them. Yes. Bloody and inhumane, but letting them live to terrorize is even worse.

Posted by: Rectal_Wart at February 06, 2006 09:58 PM (1iDKs)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Iraqi 'Militias' Capture 270 Al Qaeda

What was it that Zawahiri was saying today? That he was hiding among the 'Muslim masses'? That the U.S. is all but defeated? Right....

In The Bullpen reprints this from an MSM source:

Some 270 Arab and foreign fighters have been detained in Iraq's restive al-Anbar province in a 'defensive campaign' launched by the local population towards the al-Qaeda network, tribal leaders say. A source close to tribal chiefs told Adnkronos International (AKI) that "the Iraqi security forces, with the help of the local population, have managed to arrest terrorists and Iraqis who provided them refuge."
Most of them were Syrian, Saudi and Jordanian nationals. They have been transferred to Baghdad to be interrogated to discover how they reached the region and who is financing their terrorist activites" the source told AKI.
"The group of (Jordanian militant and al-Qaeda pointman) Abu Musab al-Zarqawi did not expect a similar campaign which has dealt them a serious blow," he continued, adding that "it won't be the last given that the population is determined to expel those who kill civilians in the name of resistance".
Regarding the nature of the tribal militias, the source explained that "all the operations are carried out under the auspices of the defence minister Saadun al-Dulaimi and coordinated with volunteers in the area."

I'd also recommend James Joyner's new TCS piece as further evidence AQ is far from winning the war.

Posted by: Rusty at 03:02 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 243 words, total size 2 kb.

New Video: What is that gross thing on Zawahiri's head?

A new video tape from al Qaeda's number two man, Ayman al-Zawahiri, has most Americans wondering exactly what that gross little mark on his head is?

In the new video aired by the Arab world's number one pro-terrorist satellite television station, Zawahiri taunts the President for missing him in an air strike in Pakistan saying, "Bush, do you know where I am? I am among the Muslim masses."

The Muslims masses, for their part, deny knowing where Zawahiri is. Because, as we are reminded nearly every day by the MSM, it is only a small minority of extremists in the Islamic world that support terrorism. Therefore, by definition, the Muslim masses can't know where Zawahiri is hiding, can they?

Word on the street from the Muslim masses regarding Zawahiri's funny head mark vary. Some claim it is a birth mark, however such marks are common among those wishing to seem incredibly pious in the Muslim world. Such marks come about when the pious one genuflects often during prayer, touching the forehead to the ground five times daily.

tattoo.target.jpg A source particularly close to Ayman al-Zawahiri, though, tells us that the mark is, "really a bullseye...kind of the equivalent of the tattoo in the small of a chick's back...if you, er, get my drift."

No, we at the Jawa Report do not get your drift. What is it, exactly, that you are implying?

Zawahiri continued from his hiding place somewhere in the caves along the borders of Pakistan-Afghanistan, "Butcher of Washington, you are not only defeated and a liar, but also a failure. You are a curse on your own nation."

One wonders if that forehead thingy isn't some kind of mark of the beast symbol? Like, maybe Zawahiri is really Gorbachev? You've never seen the two in the same room have you?

The man with the mystery forehead mark also says in the video, "My second message is to the American people, who are drowning in illusions." No word yet on the more realistic illusion of creating a global Caliphate from a cave in Waziristan.

"I tell you that Bush and his gang are shedding your blood and wasting your money in frustrated adventures," says Zawahiri.

So, what is that annoying mark any way?

Hat tip to Tim from Opninion Bug.

Related from Counterterrorism Blog, who has extensive analysis.

More at Michelle Malkin, In The Bullpen, Protein Wisdom, Stop the ACLU and others....

Posted by: Rusty at 02:34 PM | Comments (20) | Add Comment
Post contains 422 words, total size 3 kb.

Cyber Attacks Against Danish Websites, Counterattacks Against Arab Sites

An interet war is brewing between a small minority of hackers who happen to be an even smaller subset of misunderstanders of Islam and Danish geeks. Viking Observer at AIR passes this translation on from the Danish media:

A large number of Danish papersÃ‚Â´ web versions have crashed. Suspicions immediately center on the hacker attacks being because of the Mohammed-drawings in Jyllands-Posten. ..
All the web media hit are hosted on the same servers at the internet company Metropol Online, owned by Berlingske (Danish publishing house). ..
Among the media hit is the homepage of Jyllands-Postens, www.jp.dk, which creates suspicions, that hackers are trying to hit the paper as part of the row over the papersÃ‚Â´ Mohammed-drawings.

And Danish geeks respond in kind to the cyberterrorism coming from the Muslim world. Again, from Viking Observer:

A Danish chain-mail that is circulating by email urges people to take part in a web-based attack on arab media. This happens in reaction to the hacker-attack on Danish papersÃ‚Â´ websites over the weekend....
he email starts out with the headline "Denmark under attack by moslem hackers" and contains an attached program, that starts a so-called denial-of-service attack on five arab media, among them Al-Jazeera, Arab News og Gulf News.
In the letter the recipient is urged to let the program run on his computer to bombard the arab media with data and thus block their homepages.

Wait. They're attacking al Jazeera? Good on you. As I've argued countless times in the past, al Jazeera is part of the enemy propaganda machine and is therefore a legitimate target in the war-on-terror. It is high time the Western world employed these cyberterrorists to our own advantage. The model of the privateer comes to mind.

And for a great non-dhimmi Danish blogger, visit Enough!

Posted by: Rusty at 01:29 PM | Comments (26) | Add Comment
Post contains 313 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Death To women's Rights. Death To women's Freedoms. Death To women's Liberties. Destroy feminism. Marry your daughters off at menarchy. Rape your wives. Death To women's Rights. Question: why do the europeans worship women? Are they faggots?

Posted by: m at January 30, 2006 01:49 PM (MXWyj)

2 I wonder what M is getting the little woman for Valentines Day.

Posted by: Brad at January 30, 2006 02:05 PM (3OPZt)

3 Roofies?

Posted by: Brad at January 30, 2006 02:06 PM (3OPZt)

4 m has a woman? I think he more likely has a goat.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 02:11 PM (rUyw4)

5 M has been banned.

Posted by: Rusty at January 30, 2006 02:12 PM (JQjhA)

6 Oooooookaaaaay then. I'm not sure what point M was trying to make, but I am sure he completely missed.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 30, 2006 02:12 PM (0yYS2)

7 M who?

Posted by: Oyster at January 30, 2006 02:32 PM (5pqct)

8 I'm sure it made complete sense to m - which is a scary thought in itself.

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 02:37 PM (3aakz)

9 He sounded like a British 'father's rights' advocate, as odd as that may sound.

Posted by: Rusty at January 30, 2006 02:49 PM (JQjhA)

10 Hey, M. Mohammad is the false prophet and Allah is his Beast. See you in hell.

Posted by: MandM at January 30, 2006 03:11 PM (/lpvu)

11 this is a really outrageous act on the danish behalf; it is a lame excuse to protect the freedom of expression by insulting the thoughts and beliefs of others. This will testify to the Danish inability to grasp the importance of being responsible to the so-called freedom ; becaues a vital part of freedom is realising one's own boundries.

Posted by: rajeh al-rajeh at January 30, 2006 04:23 PM (v811s)

12 Ha Ha Ha - you have a rather odd definition of freedom - speech, expression etc. But your presence in the West far from your islamic utopias essentially betrays your ideals and exposes you as a fraud.

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 05:12 PM (3aakz)

13 "becaues a vital part of freedom is realising one's own boundries." Yep - now you just need to realize YOUR boundries. "by insulting the thoughts and beliefs of others." Typical. It's all about you and your religion, isn't it?

Posted by: Supernaut at January 30, 2006 06:07 PM (P/mhs)

14 There is a town in central Java, called Kudus. Back in 15th century, it was still a Hindu majority. Then came a muslim wali name Sunan Kudus, who establish a school and preach about Islam to the town inhabitant. Gradually the number of muslim increase. One interesting thing was, in order to respect the Hindu beliefs, Sunan Kudus prohibited his disciples and followers from eating cow meat. Even though there is nothing in Islam that prohibit so. Up until today 600 years later, with Kudus as a muslim-majority town, many of the people still restraint from eating cow. Another story, there is a church called Gereja Jawi Wetan (East Java Church). Since its establishment in 19th century, it has prohibited its congregation from eating pork, to respect their muslim neighbour. What do you think ?

Posted by: jarot at January 30, 2006 07:14 PM (6Xjty)

15 jarot, I think that people who come to Europe should respect the traditions of Europe, just like Sunan Kudas respected the tradition of the Hindus and Gereja Jawi Wetan respected the tradition of the Muslims.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 07:26 PM (rUyw4)

16 jarot I think your full of bull - nice parable though for a sermon.

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 07:30 PM (3aakz)

17 You mean someone is spreading some .exe or script among Danes and asking them to use it to attack Al Jazeera, et al??? Maybe this script is actually a nasty virus created by the Islamo-Fascist Cyber-Terrorists and it is gonna do something mailicious to the poor Danes who thought they were attacking someone else??? You don't know what kind of twisted minds they have in the Middle East.... P.S. If the Islamists want THEIR religion respected by others, they should respect OTHER religions, as well. Instead, they destroy other houses of worship (e.g. Jewish Temple Mount in Jeruslem, Hindu Temple at Ayodyah, and more with Christian churches and Buddhist temples....). As it is, the rest of the world has tolerated Islamic intolerance for so long that the Arabs/Muslims get upset when their own intolerance is not tolerated.... The M.E. is a very strange place...

Posted by: Jake at January 30, 2006 10:59 PM (M4Fn3)

18 jesusland joe, i think to respect someone's faith or values can be done be it in Europe or anywhere. when i spoke to my Dutch guest, I can talk openly and addressing him with his name directly without worry of offending him. i accept the openness as part of the values hold by my Dutch guest. in the other hand I won't use the same openness to my fellow countrymen, because many of them will find it offesinve. another case, asking "where are you going", or "where have you been" to a complete stranger are considered to be a part of polite conversation by my fellow countrymen. while the same questions to my Dutch guess, get a reply "that's none of your business".

Posted by: jarot at January 31, 2006 07:55 AM (tN4d5)

19 It is coordinated dos attacks and dos tools that are affecting the Danish sites. More information can be found here regarding the boycott and the cyber attacks: http://www.wincoast.com/forum/showthread.php?p=527904#post527904

Posted by: Casey at February 01, 2006 12:10 PM (c0QDg)

20 The Danish cartoons are nasty and repulsive. Muslims are right to condemn them and boycott filthy Danish products.

Posted by: Aamir Ali at February 01, 2006 01:20 PM (tKxm6)

21 Strange that we don't see bands of marauding buddhists threatening to kill anyone who eats meat ?? Or bands of guerilla pig farmers parachuting into Syria forcing the faithful to eat pork ?!

Posted by: cartoon lover at February 03, 2006 10:07 AM (VrREW)

22 Where was all the protests when the crazy muslims were blowing up all the staues of budda ?

Posted by: TJ at February 03, 2006 03:55 PM (9Uqlj)

23 Feck them rag wearing fagots, I say its all a load of tosh, don't believe any of that shite. fredom to garfield, Fcuk the prophet Mohammed with some pork sausages.

Posted by: Fcuk Mohammed at February 04, 2006 06:50 PM (7vXIb)

24 My best friend said I had to visit your site. She was right,thanks!

Posted by: Lora at February 04, 2006 11:30 PM (+uNoj)

25 These cartoons have raised, according to me, the question of the freedom of speech's boundaries. Are we stepping on other's freedom by publishing these cartoons? (and don't tell me it's just a cartoon, critics may have more impact than acts) Example: If you share a flat with a jewish friend for instance and you hang posters in your room of Hitler or Mussolini(cuz your a fan, it's your right to be fan of whoever you want). There's no law or legal act that prohibits you from having these posters in your room because it's the freedom of thoughts and beliefs. But you will not gain the sympathy and the friendship of your flat mate obviously. Therefore, if we want to live together in peace with our muslim neighbors, we have to be careful not to offense them. Of course, in a hypothetic utopia of freedom of speech these cartoons should be allowed. But learning to live together is more than just saying "i can say whatever i want cuz it's freedom of speech", it's also to be careful to what you say and what we do according to OTHER'S beliefs and thoughts. I would prefer the phrase "HOW TO LIVE TOGETHER" rather than "FREEDOM OF SPEECH". "Freedom of speech", as much as "democracy", have been overused by media and have been uprooted from their social-economical-historical initial context, to end up as an political oriented instrument.

Posted by: Khaled at February 10, 2006 08:03 AM (6ygiN)

26 Why don't people start waking up to the real world instead of believing in instituions some created over 1500 years ago. Religion in any form was in those times a system of law which worked well when there was no form of organised policing, as time went on eventually religion become nothing more than a reason to go to war and break those very rules that they were created to police. People who still believe in religion, the after life etc should face up to the truth, they are believing in no more than a story, and as everyone knows stories change with time until they fade away completely. The various religious texts have all been manipulated with time to suit those in power at the time. During the times that they were written very few could even read or write therefore relying on the preaching and word's of others, they may as well be hear-say rather than evidence of actual history. On a side note- If the goal as preached by many of the religious fanatics is for a united Muslim nation, Palestine nation, or any other such claim why are all these groups still in fighting amongst them selves. If you cant even unify as groups do you really think you can unify the world all under one religion. At least the west doesnt preach happiness, freedom and love all for changing faith, the west has already experienced the difficulties of unification and has still never managed to get it right. Along the way one critical lesson has been learnt that violence, war and terrorism will not acheive anything even if you declare it in a holy way as was done with the Crusades and now with Jihad.

Posted by: S J at February 14, 2006 05:47 PM (UOLR0)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Something Rotten in Denmark

Two very related stories. First, the Danish Left has been funneling money to terrorists for years. I guess paying tthe jizya hasn't helped the Danish Left one bit.

Second, why are the tiny minority of extremists calling for a boycott of Denmark? Could it be that Denmark currently chairs the U.N. Security Council and the Islamic Republic of Iran is about to receive that bodies censure?

Posted by: Rusty at 11:09 AM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 74 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I'll go out and buy some Danish beer for the cause. I don't think I've ever tried either of the brands they listed but I'm willing to take one for the team.

Posted by: slug at January 30, 2006 11:19 AM (wcNc2)

2 Rusty, I imagine that the Left in the US has also been sending money to terrorists either through so-called Muslim charities or indirectly through other channels. The media in the US will not investigate these kinds of actions, but will moan and whine about terrorist's wives being questioned about the activities of their husbands. And, of course, the US government has been funding terrorists through its aid to the Arabs living in the Gaza and West Bank. One wonders how much of that aid has purchased Kassam rockets, RPGs, Ak-47's and the like, or has freed up other funds to purchase them.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 11:49 AM (rUyw4)

3 - yeah, and a address to email that newspaper that has published the cartoons would be nice - all the muslims in Denmark need to boycott the free benefits and welfare they get from the Danes - that'll fix 'em good!

Posted by: goesh at January 30, 2006 12:41 PM (vX0fY)

4 Death To women's Rights. Death To women's Freedoms. Death To women's Liberties. Destroy feminism. Marry your daughters off at menarchy. Rape your wives. Death To women's Rights. Question: why do the europeans worship women? Are they faggots?

Posted by: m at January 30, 2006 12:50 PM (MXWyj)

5 m, there is a village in Pakistan missing an idiot. They await your return. And so do we. Begone, troll.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 01:05 PM (rUyw4)

6 I suppose it boils down to all the world's Christians, Jews, Hindus and Buddhists who do not regard mohammed as a prophet. The next line of attack will be these blogs.

Posted by: TheoldJew at January 30, 2006 01:33 PM (1w6Ud)

7 False Prophet I consider him. Jesus warns of the false prophet many times.

Posted by: Howie at January 30, 2006 01:57 PM (D3+20)

8 Anyone who sends money to terrorists should face the firing squad

Posted by: sandpiper at January 31, 2006 03:47 PM (uTBPj)

9 One of the 12 drawings shows the prophet mohammed with a bomb in his turban. When different groups of islamic terrorists cut necks of Christians they do it in mohammed's name. When people in western countries make a link between mohammed and terror it doesn't surprise me. In my opinion the 11 other cartoons are rather innocent. Why burn embassys and threaten innocent people and boycot products of Danish companies who don't have the slightes influense over the situation or anything, what so ever, to do with the FREE AND INDEPENDENT newspapaer Jyllands-Posten?

Posted by: a Dane at February 05, 2006 11:49 AM (q/adn)

10 This site is made by idiots who do not know what they are talking about.

Posted by: The Voice of Reason at February 18, 2006 03:29 PM (7LBaz)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Fight Back Against Muslim Fascists, Buy Danish!!

A billion misunderstanders of Islam are set to boycott Denmark. How should the civilized world respond? Buy Danish, or the terrorists have already won. (Via Tanker)

Posted by: Rusty at 10:34 AM | Comments (35) | Add Comment
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I've made a list of Danish products and will be shopping after work today.

Posted by: Oyster at January 30, 2006 10:54 AM (5pqct)

2 Death To women's Rights. Death To women's Freedoms. Death To women's Liberties. Destroy feminism.

Posted by: m at January 30, 2006 10:58 AM (MXWyj)

3 Death to death.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 11:00 AM (rUyw4)

4 To show solidarity with the Danish, the other big dairy producers of the world: New Zealand, Canada, USA, Italy, etc should pull their products from Middle Eastern shelves. Let them use their own cows. Oh wait, they can't.

Posted by: Graeme at January 30, 2006 11:10 AM (+JGk2)

5 Excellent idea, Graeme, and every right-thinking(hehe) person in the world should boycott any products from the Muslim world. It is now time to join up with Canada and start maximum production of the oil tar sands and begin drilling in previous unavailable areas of Alaska and make the free world energy independent. The West should begin an immediate program similar to the Manhattan Project in an effort to rid ourselves of our dependance on imported oil. Most of the problems in the World could and would be solved by the success of just such a program.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 11:27 AM (rUyw4)

6 Buy Danish? Will a danish and coffee suffice? What exactly is Danish anyway? I know IKEA carries some Danish stuff too - but do I have to mingle with the Will & Grace crowd over this? Danes are Europeans - and very liberal ones at that. Why do I have to express support for them in their internal domestic bruha? Would a Dane "Buy American"? I prefer to sit back and watch the show.

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 12:26 PM (3aakz)

7 I am Danish and I drive an American car. My last car was American, my current car is and my next car will probably also be an American one.

Posted by: Mk at January 30, 2006 12:37 PM (hWJvj)

8 I'm buying some Gevalia coffee today, and some Danish ham(seems appropriate). As long as the Dane's stand up to these Islamic fascists, I will stand beside them. We will either stand together or we will see Europe lost, and I do not want to see that. My ancestors are from France, Ireland and Scotland. I would like them to remain the way they are, imperfect as they might be, rather than become Muslim cesspools.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 12:43 PM (rUyw4)

9 I donÂ’t need any anal lube or pornography, but I may buy a beer or two. I would be willing to help out the Danes if they show some sign of putting up a fight. We shall see. This has been a long time coming. The Western European left has been so busy bashing Bush and the US they didnÂ’t realize the barbarians are at the gate.

Posted by: Brad at January 30, 2006 12:45 PM (3OPZt)

10 Death To women's Rights. Death To women's Freedoms. Death To women's Liberties. Destroy feminism. Marry your daughters off at menarchy. Rape your wives. Death To women's Rights

Posted by: m at January 30, 2006 12:49 PM (MXWyj)

11 I will go out of my way to buy Danish products

Posted by: goesh at January 30, 2006 12:50 PM (vX0fY)

12 I'll have a Carlsberg or two...or 3.

Posted by: Jester at January 30, 2006 12:50 PM (82gkA)

13 m, go somewhere you are wanted. Like Pakistan.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 12:51 PM (rUyw4)

14 JJ My ancestors too were European - who voted with their feet - for good reason lest we forget. Grandfather had a funny story from Ellis Island - he was from Tyrol - a Tyrolian. Some confusion over his "papers" - asked if he was Austrian or Italian - he said neither - fuck them both - I come here to be an American. Danes have a long history and a are tough people - but a lots changed in 50 years. I'm not prepared to stand behind anyone if I remain unsure if they will stand for themselves.

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 01:05 PM (3aakz)

15 Mmmmm, Danish porn......

Posted by: Rusty at January 30, 2006 01:12 PM (JQjhA)

16 IÂ’ve HEARD thatÂ’s the good stuff.

Posted by: Brad at January 30, 2006 01:19 PM (3OPZt)

17 Good point, hondo, and I stand beside them, with my hand on my gun, just in case.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 02:09 PM (rUyw4)

18 Hondo, Breitbart posts on an opnion poll in Denmark indicating they are standing up okay. Much more than the Norwegians have. Danes back their Prime Minister's position with 79% supporting. They back the newspaper with 62% supporting. http://www.breitbart.com/news/na/060128125615.51rhwazo.html This is not, wholly, an internal domestic bruha and the Danes have supported us considerably since 9/11. At least buy a Carlsberg or two if you plan to sit and watch.

Posted by: Dusty at January 30, 2006 03:29 PM (8RfU1)

19 Initial polls are encouraging - but initial - the feeling of the moment. Lets see how it stands the test of time and a lil' pressure. My gut tell me they will fold - then expect a group hug with their immigrant muslims. Expect words like dialog, education, cultural understanding etc to be bandied about in about a week or so. They will seek something they can agree upon - like the evil in the world is the USA - something like that - something safe. Spend a good number of years in Europe - as both a soldier - and later as a carefree drifter. This NYC boy ain't some naive fool - I can see it in those Western European eyes - they don't know who they are anymore - they dislike their past and fear the future - their only comfort is in their comfort and maintaining some strange form of status quo - of which even they are uncertain.

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 04:54 PM (3aakz)

20 Sadly, I think you are right, hondo.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 06:27 PM (rUyw4)

21 Looks like a pair of kneepads is the new fashion trend sweeping Western Europe. Only question is which nation puts them on faster - Danes giving the French a run for their money ... (shot). (sorry for the nasty imagery)

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 06:57 PM (3aakz)

22 Thx for the support..:O)

Posted by: d at February 01, 2006 04:14 AM (cwbRS)

23 here is a satirical picture of muhammed, send it around http://www.spread-it.com/dl.php?id=94d579fa1491704a2d6036fba3ca1f483089d70b

Posted by: theprophet at February 02, 2006 08:12 AM (9geKR)

24 time to fight back

Posted by: deadeye at February 03, 2006 04:49 PM (ntCeu)

25 I'm british, these f**kers blew up my tube, we need to recognise that their whole belief system is evil. It aint America versus islam it is anyone in their right mind against it The French by the way reprinted the cartoon

Posted by: cityboy@lycos.co.uk at February 03, 2006 04:56 PM (ntCeu)

26 Denmark will stand up for the freedom of speech. At least because no Dane seriously believes any terror organization would waste a bomb on such a small and unnoticeable country. Not even after the Mohammed cartoons. By the way Hondo: We have no trouble "finding our selves"(but perhaps America have trouble finding us?), and I believe only Germany dislikes its past Â– but please, we are not one nation and can not be considered as such. Denmark and France is not more alike, than the U.S.A. and Denmark.

Posted by: Nadia at February 03, 2006 07:58 PM (To19j)

27 Hey, Respect is part of freedom, and everybody should do the same from all religions. Freedom is not 100% open, ethics is a limit to freedom, Manners is a limit to freedom, cloths is a limit to freedom, law and rules are limits to freedome, but they are a fundamental part of FREEDOM. As someone says: The crazy man is the only REALLY free human.

Posted by: AAA at February 04, 2006 07:28 PM (GRa8u)

28 The Danish certainly helped us in our "war on terror" by sending troops. The least you can do is support them now.

Posted by: buy_danish at February 06, 2006 08:28 AM (eFM8r)

29 THem Arabs seem jes look for somethin to stay pissed about, and now they are mad at our Danish friends. I'm gonna be sure to buy a bunch of stuff from the Danish, jes to show them ragheads we don't need em. Wish they'd leave us all alone. Would'nt hurt my feeling's none to see a purple glow in that part of the world. Things would be alot more peaceful without them folks makin so much trouble fer every wun else... If'n they wanna stay mad at their house that's ok with me, but they don't need to comeover stirrin up trouble at mine....or at my good friends and neighbors. Buy Danish, Buy Danish, Buy Danish,,,, I love the Danish people so....

Posted by: RAD-Neck at February 06, 2006 03:27 PM (HVWjZ)

30 Why dont we have a movement in support of freedom. I stay in NH and i cant find a single Danish produce in any store here. Help!!

Posted by: Freedom at February 11, 2006 11:14 PM (dI1Ko)

31 Blogger "The Dissident Frogman" actively maintains a posting with some very high quality "Support Denmark" graphics in multiple languages (the list of which is growing) such as English, French, Italian, Polish, German, Simplified Chinese, Spanish, and Romanian: http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/dacha/001580.html I recommend downloading and using these banners on our blogs.

Posted by: Russell Whitaker at February 12, 2006 05:31 PM (bWAWp)

32 u are all a bunch of sick twisted puppies

Posted by: dmk at February 15, 2006 07:33 PM (ubIY5)

33 the truth is thaty we the west r a finished people . we r the most fuycking spine less bastards on earth .i hope the muslims kill all danish males so we can purchase their mothers and daughters.enjoy

Posted by: lovbe at February 27, 2006 08:32 AM (SA/90)

34 i dont need the support of fucking americans. u r responsible for all this shit. and we wont even buy ur whorish mothers and incestuous daughters. bloody USA ios fucking europ[e with the help of bastard brits. may more buildfings fall and tubes burst.enjoy, i will

Posted by: dane at February 27, 2006 08:37 AM (SCKIc)

35 omsslf fschugez

Posted by: Howell at February 27, 2006 07:35 PM (vCUTm)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Interview with U.S. General

In addition to figthing along side his troops 3 or 4 days a week, Brigadier General Daniel P. Bolger has this to say about our Iraqi allies:

Patriotism brings Iraqi troops to the recruiting station. Often, I ask them: Â‘Why did you join?Â’ The most common answer I get is, Â‘ItÂ’s my duty.Â’ Many have lost family members to terrorists. The Iraqi rifleman makes about $300 equivalent a month, but a terrorist can make that in a night planting one roadside bomb. The guys who fight for money work for the other side. We have the patriots, and thatÂ’s why we have the popular support.

Kewl.

Posted by: Rusty at 09:07 AM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 113 words, total size 1 kb.

Muslim Fascists Want U.N. Resolution Squelching Freedom of Speech, Sanctioning Denmark

In addition to threatening to blow themselves up in Denmark and actually murdering Christians in Iraq, the tiny minority of misunderstanders of the Prophet Muhammed's specific injunction to kill blasphemers is calling on the U.N. to condemn Denmark because a few newspapers chose to run cartoons poking fun at Islam.

Meanwhile, the Left continues to compare the Christian Right with these fascists calling them the 'American Taliban'. Soooooo, when is Pat Robertson going to issue a fatwa against Kanye West?

AKI:

The Muslim worldÂ’s two main political bodies have said they are seeking a UN resolution, backed by possible sanctions, to protect religions, in the wake of the controversy caused by publication by a Danish newspaper of cartoons which many Muslims believe denigrate the prophet Muhammad. Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, head of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, said in Cairo the OIC would "ask the UN General Assembly to pass a resolution banning attacks on religious beliefs." Ahmad Ben Helli, secretary general of the Arab League, confirmed contacts were under way for such a proposal to be made to the UN.

The interesting question raised by all of this: is Islam inherently unable to support freedom of speech and have radical fascist Muslims found their greatest allies in the Western Left which is often game for passing 'hate speech' laws?

Posted by: Rusty at 08:00 AM | Comments (40) | Add Comment
Post contains 240 words, total size 2 kb.

1 This was bound to happen. But they had better be careful, they might get what they wish for. This could easily be used against the Muslims, as they constantly attack the religious beliefs of people who belong to other faiths. But, of course, the Muslims would be allowed to say and do what they want, and the rest of us would be silenced. In a pig's eye, I say. I want to make this clear. For the sake of my children, and the sake of the free world, I will never, ever give in to these people, no matter what they say and do. Every man and woman who is committed to living in freedom should make the same committment. These Islamists must be stopped or the world will be returned to the Dark Ages.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 08:42 AM (rUyw4)

2 Assuming the wording will be as broad as to impose sanctions "to protect religions", then every Islamic nation on the planet will be shooting itself in the foot.

Posted by: Graeme at January 30, 2006 08:47 AM (+JGk2)

3 Considering that blowing themselves up is a hobby, shooting themselves in the foot is like breathing. Muslim culture is primitive, backward, and self destructive, and must be put down for the good of humanity and civilization.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 30, 2006 08:55 AM (0yYS2)

4 The Funny thing is when a Muslim exercise the freedom of speech goes to jail example (I love what happened on sep 11), and when a Christian does Nooooooooooo it's a "freedom of speech". And let me ask this. lets say a Muslim newspaper publish a cartoon of a Muslim shitting on a cross or a church. Would you consider that to be a "freedom of speech?!"

Posted by: blackmummy at January 30, 2006 08:57 AM (X9qqF)

5 I don't expect that the UN, as moronic as they are, agreeing to this. Sanctions are too serious to be used just because someone's feelings were hurt. Instead I expect that behind the scenes, the UN will try to pressure Denmark into caving and bending over to end all the complaining. Hopefully Denmark will stand firm. For a religion that's supposed to be so great and all-powerful, Islam always seems to need some new regulation to hide behind. Almost as if confidence in its strength isn't as high as we're all expected to believe.

Posted by: Graeme at January 30, 2006 08:59 AM (+JGk2)

6 This is the strategy of fanatical muslims. They do it in the US with organizations such as CAIR. They go on the offensive and claim they're being treated with "intolerance" and "suspicion". DUH. The world cannot tolerate their fanaticism but everyone is so far back on their heels, they're afraid to call radical islam what it is. The fear of being branded as intolerant or racist or somehow "against" diversity keeps everyone quiet.. even our OWN PRESIDENT. Bush is STILL not ready to publicly conceded that the world has a major problem.. in the form of radical islam.

Posted by: Richard at January 30, 2006 09:00 AM (W8EsU)

7 Black Mummy, What the hell are you talking to? Incitement to join terror organizations has always been considered illegal in the U.S. (For instance, the famous KKK hearings of the late 19th Cent). And, to my knowledge, no person has ever been jailed for religious blasphemy in the U.S. EVER. Calling someone a jerk or worse for being a religous bigot is one thing, putting them in jail or fining them is far different

Posted by: Rusty at January 30, 2006 09:04 AM (JQjhA)

8 BUY DANISH! Spread this around. http://hnn.us/blogs/entries/21097.html

Posted by: Ariya at January 30, 2006 09:09 AM (uxW3N)

9 Rusty, What the the hell are YOU talking about?!, who says anything about terror group? read what I wrote AGAIN!

Posted by: Blackmummy at January 30, 2006 09:12 AM (X9qqF)

10 Yes, blackmummy, if you knew anything about the West you wouldn't make such a statement. Jesus was depicted in one art piece a few years ago covered with urine, and yes, I was angry but I did not call for international sanctions or violence. If your religion is good and you are confident in your beliefs, then you should not be worried about what other people say. And violence should never be an option.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 09:13 AM (rUyw4)

11 "And let me ask this. lets say a Muslim newspaper publish a cartoon of a Muslim shitting on a cross or a church. Would you consider that to be a "freedom of speech?!"" Why, yes - yes I would.

Posted by: Oyster at January 30, 2006 09:22 AM (5pqct)

12 Joe, I lived 10 years in the states. and just because you didn't do anything to protect your belives don't expect me to do the same. By the way, ask your self why does this newspaper make funn of our prophit? why can't you just say its wrong to make funn of peoples bleives?!

Posted by: blackmummy at January 30, 2006 09:23 AM (X9qqF)

13 blackmummy, then you should know that there is nothing you can do to keep people here in the states from making fun of your religion. And it is bad, not wrong, to make fun of someone's religion. I don't think you should do it, but if you have a commitment to freedom, then you must allow it. You don't have to like it, and you can criticize it, but you cannot stop it.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 09:35 AM (rUyw4)

14 Insulting my religion is about the same level an insult to me as dissing my favorite sports teams.

Posted by: john ryan at January 30, 2006 09:38 AM (TcoRJ)

15 joe, if someone spits in your face is it bad or wrong?!

Posted by: blackmummy at January 30, 2006 09:47 AM (X9qqF)

16 Tell me, blackmummy, how do you feel about your prophet's denigration of Jews and Christians calling them "pigs"? Clean up your own act before you start demanding that others do so.

Posted by: Oyster at January 30, 2006 09:50 AM (5pqct)

17 blackmummy, spitting in someone's face is a physical act, whereas making fun is not. If you spit in my face, I'm going to whip your ass. You can make fun of my religion all you want to, because you have not physically assualted me.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 09:55 AM (rUyw4)

18 Hey blackmummy, STFU and go be a good dhimmi you piece of shit.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 30, 2006 10:16 AM (0yYS2)

19 Joe, By your law, if I spit in your face and you whip my ass then you would have to pay the damages for my ass! because spitting is not considered as a physical act in a court of USA law.

Posted by: blackmummy at January 30, 2006 10:26 AM (X9qqF)

20 For the record--I am pissing on the Koran as I write this. Issue a fatwa. I dare you. The same Constitution that protects the right of a Communist to burn the flag protects my right to piss on your Koran. And, for the record, people make fun of my religion ALL THE TIME. I've been offended over it, but I've never threatened legal action, a boycott, or threats of violence. Being able to say negative things about religion without a resort to violence is one of the things that seperates civilized people from the backwards tribalism of Islam.

Posted by: Rusty at January 30, 2006 10:26 AM (JQjhA)

21 I'm taking my copy of the Koran to the shooting range this weekend. They don't just make fun of our religion, they actually blow up our houses of worship. So, yeah, blackmummy, we don't freak out when some idiot puts a crucifix in a jar of urine or throws crap at a picture of the Virgin Mary. Get over yourself blackmummy, 84% of the world is non-Muslim, and we're working to make sure it stays that way.

Posted by: Vinnie at January 30, 2006 10:39 AM (f289O)

22 You're wrong, blackmummy.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 10:46 AM (rUyw4)

23 10 years in the states didn't do much for blackmummy's command of the english language, nor his understanding of the law. That's because as a Muslim he never ventured beyond the narrow constructs of his religion and its demand that he not fraternize with the infidel. Wouldn't want him to be tainted with the silly ideas of such things as the meaning of freedom, now would we?

Posted by: Oyster at January 30, 2006 10:46 AM (5pqct)

24 Interesting concept - going to the Unitied Nations in an attempt to stiffle free speech in another country - wonder where they got that idea? Next thing you know people will be running to the UN to control the media and the internet - oooopppppps. Damn! Is blackmummy the best we can hope for now for argumental discourse? Makes even John Ryan look good! Where has all the lib/left talent gone? If this keeps up, I may end up playing Devil's Advocate and go OPFOR.

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 10:54 AM (3aakz)

25 Hondo, you're assuming that the left ever had any talent, other than bullying and intimidation, of course.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 30, 2006 11:17 AM (0yYS2)

26 By the way, isn't the term "muslim fascist" kinda redundant?

Posted by: Imprbobulus Maximus at January 30, 2006 11:19 AM (0yYS2)

27 blackmummy crawled back under his bridge.

Posted by: Oyster at January 30, 2006 12:05 PM (5pqct)

28 because you didn't do anything to protect your belives don't expect me to do the same. Ah, so what should we expect your action to be? I'm assuming an angry letter, or stop buying Danish products, you're a follower of the religion of peace, so that is what I EXPECT you to do, but you nutjobs will probably burn/kill something/someone and claim it's justified.

Posted by: dave at January 30, 2006 12:49 PM (CcXvt)

29 It's amazing that these people always think in terms of violence when responding to criticism of their religion. ROPMA!

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 01:02 PM (rUyw4)

30 Maxie They got some talent - but blackmummy isn't one of them - which is why I never bother to respond to the drop-bys.

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 01:14 PM (3aakz)

31 I like to call them out for what they are, but I won't waste any higher brain functions on them.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 30, 2006 02:18 PM (0yYS2)

32 Where's the cartoons from this morning? Afraid you'll get a real fatwa issued?

Posted by: Arthur teel at January 30, 2006 05:13 PM (H05by)

33 My Socom trumps all fatwas.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 05:45 PM (rUyw4)

34 Feed muslim children gummy bears. It works for me. Guess what is in the gummy bears?

Posted by: Andre at January 30, 2006 06:20 PM (bQ3vG)

35 Also buy used copied of the Koran and store it in your bathroom. When you run out of toiletpaper just reach for the Koran.

Posted by: Andre at January 30, 2006 06:27 PM (bQ3vG)

36 If you own a copy of the koran, why buy TP at all?

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 30, 2006 06:31 PM (0yYS2)

37 Well, not everyone will know to wipe their ass with a Koran now will they? one use of the word for backside keeps within the PG-13 guidelines of this webpage. Kind of like how one bad word in transformers the movie made it go from G to PG.

Posted by: Andre at January 30, 2006 10:35 PM (bQ3vG)

38 Also, you have to remember liberals and other assorted talking heads keep babbling "religion of peace" and they might get offended by having to use the "religion of peaces'" text as toilet paper. But needless to say, it is now time to teach muslims a trick. AND THAT NEW TRICK IS FOR THEM TO DROP DEAD VIA M16 ROUNDS TO THE HEAD! They constantly say "war against Islam" this attitude by these filthy animals shows it is a war by Islam against the West, so they better get ready for some real casualties real soon! I hope we nuke Mecca and Medina!

Posted by: Andre at January 31, 2006 04:55 PM (bQ3vG)

39 "just because you didn't do anything to protect your belives don't expect me to do the same." Good, I'm glad you feel this way because... Just because you don't believe in free speech doesn't mean we have to stifle free speech. Just because you claim to value Jesus as a prophet doeesn't mean we have to value Mohammed as a profit. And, by the way, it's ridiculous to value Jesus while dispising Christianity.

Posted by: J.M. at February 01, 2006 06:15 PM (tJz/y)

40 Re Blackmummy's question about cartoons about Jesus. Here's what happened. http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,1637111,00.html?gusrc=rss

Posted by: B Chesser at February 02, 2006 07:09 PM (Y1ykG)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Oil Workers Freed

(Yenagoa, Nigeria) Earlier today, Briton Nigel Watson-Clark, American Patrick Landry, Bulgarian Milko Nichev and Honduran Harry Ebanks were released by their kidnappers. They were flown to the Nigerian capital, Abuja.

The men were taken hostage earlier this month (See here, here, and here) when about 40 armed men attacked an oil industry service vessel named Liberty Service. A previously-unknown group called the Movement for the Emancipation of Niger Delta (MEND) claimed responsibility for the attack and the kidnappings.

A source said that 100 million Nigerian Naira ($771,000) was paid as ransom for the hostages release.

Companion post at Interested-Participant.

Posted by: Mike Pechar at 04:50 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 105 words, total size 1 kb.

Smooth Operator

Wow. Look at Venezuelan Socialist strongman and number one fan of Fidel Castro put the moves on newly-back-on-the-market anti-war shrillster Cindy Sheehan. I haven't seen Latin suave done so well since Ricardo Montalban. more...

Posted by: Bluto at 01:21 AM | Comments (12) | Add Comment
Post contains 110 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Oh how she has broadened her agenda! Even the MSM has started to treat her like a leper. The left will never figure it out. If you think you have a point to make - don't make 30 points - if you got excess "baggage" - hide it in the closet and not put it on display.

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 01:43 AM (3aakz)

2 Holy shit this just keeps getting better and better! Hahahahaha!

Posted by: LC CanForce 101 at January 30, 2006 02:03 AM (3smJS)

3 Any particular reason why Cindy doesn't take her anti-war world tour to the streets of Bagdad or Kabul? She is an advocate for peace, isn't she? - and that's where the action (WAR) is! NO ONE IS STOPPING HER - SO WHAT'S THE PROBLEM?

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 02:35 AM (3aakz)

4 CINDY! GO TO IRAQ! ESTABLISH A "DIALOG" AND TALK TO THE SUNNIS, THE SHIA, THE KURDS, THE SADDAMIST INSURGENTS, THE ISLAMIC EXTREMIST FUNDAMENTALISTS, TO AQ, TO THE TALIBAN ... GIVE PEACE A CHANCE HONEY! GET OUT THERE WHERE ITS REAL! MAKE A DIFFERENCE! Yeah! Right!

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 02:57 AM (3aakz)

5 Those two kissing should be banned for safety reasons. Smash those noses together and you'll trigger some kind of devastating nuclear reaction.

Posted by: Graeme at January 30, 2006 04:23 AM (VOCa6)

6 I read about her bid to run against DiFi yesterday morning. I'm still laughing. Does she know Dianne got 70% of the vote last cycle? Does Cindy have any ideas on how to balance California's billion dollar debts, how to solve serious districting issues, how to enforce the border with Mexico? What are her plans for education, drugs, abortion, environment, gun control, infrastructure? What's she gonna do ... cry for votes and make peace signs with her fingers?

Posted by: Oyster at January 30, 2006 05:23 AM (YudAC)

7 Well, at least she's looking good.

Posted by: Thirdee at January 30, 2006 08:02 AM (BH9sQ)

8 Can we not revoke the citizenship of this bitch and make her stay in Venezuela with her new beau?

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 30, 2006 08:44 AM (rUyw4)

9 I think he is pokin her whiskers

Posted by: Filthy Allah at January 30, 2006 08:50 AM (5ceWd)

10 I hope Cindy runs and wins; she, the dhimmicraps, and Mexifornistan deserve one another.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 30, 2006 08:59 AM (0yYS2)

11 I think I just threw up.

Posted by: Brian B at January 30, 2006 11:36 AM (rGfpg)

12 I wonder if CINDY SHEEHAN will get her picture in the museum in HO CHI MIN CITY there in veitnam just like HANOI JANE and JOHN KERRY has

Posted by: sandpiper at January 31, 2006 03:52 PM (uTBPj)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

January 29, 2006

ACLU Having Another Cow

Jay at Stop the ACLU is covering the latest hissy fit and innuendo campaign from the champions of brave jihadi babyhunters everywhere, cross-posted from ACLU Watch/Republican Voices.

It seems that in one or two cases, the wives of terrorist insurgents were taken in for questioning as possible accomplices and/or material witnesses. The ACLU is trying to conflate this into some sort of organized campaign to kidnap innocent Iraqi women, and has managed to plant a story in that other bastion of objectivity and patriotism, the LA Times:

WASHINGTON Â— U.S. forces in at least two cases have detained wives of suspected insurgents in Iraq in an attempt to pressure the men into surrendering, documents obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union confirm.
"This is not an acceptable tactic," ACLU lawyer Amrit Singh said Friday.
In one instance, members of a military task force seized a mother of three young children "in order to leverage" her husband's surrender, according to an account by a civilian Defense Intelligence Agency officer.

"I certainly had no idea what Mahmoud was doing with those batteries, wires, digital watches, and 155mm artillery shells. He's always loved to putter around in his workshop. And he said that the AK-47s and SAMs were for duck hunting."

The ACLU's attempt to portray these women as innocent lambs being roughed up by the Coalition would be laughable, if the consequences of failure weren't so grave.

The only thing that the military has done wrong is to release these terrorists and terrorist enablers prematurely.

Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.

Posted by: Bluto at 07:51 PM | Comments (13) | Add Comment
Post contains 270 words, total size 2 kb.

1 The general public has no idea of the depravity of the terrorists. Our military is keeping the dogs off and they don't even care.

Posted by: Chief RZ at January 29, 2006 08:30 PM (i8rIJ)

2 So now they are the American/Iraqi Civil Liberties Union? And what amendment of the Iraqi constitution was violated? Maybe they should have said something when Sadam drained the marshes. Then I would've listened.

Posted by: RicardoVerde at January 29, 2006 08:40 PM (NWGd4)

3 If they are representing a foriegn government they have to register under the foriegn agents act passed in 1933 and still is law to this day. After they do register as foriegn agents they should be disbarred from the ABA and everything they publish be considered propaganda of a foriegn government.

Posted by: Andre at January 29, 2006 08:45 PM (bQ3vG)

4 http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode22/usc_sec_22_00000611----000-.html <-- the law that I speak of. I hope the ACLU gets told to stuff it.

Posted by: Andre at January 29, 2006 08:51 PM (bQ3vG)

5 Attorneys Conflatiig Lies Unlimited .................Camel Poop does not ring true............. "This is not an acceptable tactic," ACLU lawyer Amrit Singh said Friday. OR "BDS Attorneys charge that the US Army routinely runs wife snatching torture cells all over the world." ..................*Tactics* *Smacktics*................ The tell-tale kibble & bits Â“leveragingÂ” Â“secretive task forceÂ” Â“locked up the young mothers of a nursing babysÂ” [must be a rookies, they left out Bambi & Bunnies] Â“Iraqi human rights activist Hind al-Salehi contends that U.S. anti-insurgent units, coming up empty-handed in raids on suspectsÂ’ houses, have at times detained wives to pressure men into turning themselves in.Â” LOL! US Army comes up Â“Empty HandedÂ”!! = Full blown agit-prop BS. Â“American Civil Liberties UnionÂ” = Full Blown ENEMIES of the UNITED STATES MSM Â“storiesÂ” and "legends" raise more questions than supply satisfactory answers. Accuracy, context, agendas, facts left in, facts left out, etc. who trusts the ACLU or the MSM anymore? Our Military folks are intelligent, brave, street smart, well trained, well equiped, etc. NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES THESE ASSHATS CLAIM DIFFERENT! WeÂ’re at war, the WOT. Back here in the States, Police Forces, [local: Fed: State:] sometimes have to exert pressure on Spouses and families in garden variety and famous crime cases. for example: All capitol cases generally involve long interviews with suspects and their families. Serial Killers Dennis RaderÂ’s [BKT killer] wife and family were held for extensive questioning and depositions and called back time and again. Gary Leon Ridgway [Green River Killer], 3rd wife the same. Or the Mafia families etc.

Posted by: Rubin at January 29, 2006 09:40 PM (OfB5J)

6 Terrorists have wives too. I know I saw one on TV after she was arrested, when her suicide belt did not explode in Jordan -- after her husband's killed a vast number of a wedding party guests (Lions of Allah?) Some of the wives are involved in the operations, and as such they should be held. They are not harmed, this is a justified tactic. The only people that can sympathize with this action, is those who feel sorry for the terrorist, who has to make the choice of turning himself in or letting his family sit in jail. Terrorist sympathizers should be in there with them -- in my opinion.

Posted by: dave at January 29, 2006 10:24 PM (CcXvt)

7 Do they not realize that we are watching their acts of treason as they are being committed, and that we will remember these things at a time in the future when the ropes come out? It's almost like they all want to get a hemp necktie.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 30, 2006 12:31 AM (0yYS2)

8 ACLUs only interest is to bring down current administration and hopefully replace it with a leftist leaning one to assist them in furthering their domestic agenda. Iraq - these "wives" - are just available props - which they down really give a damn about anyway. Detain - arrest - same thing ... perfectly legal and acceptable here in USA for spouses of wanted fugitives suspected of providing assistance and obstructing justice. Happens all the time here - just 2 cases there???? You can do better ACLU! Left has failed miserably to date in coming up with a real knockdown issue - has clearly settled for the tactic of "death by a thousand pin pricks". Dream on pinheads!

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 02:02 AM (3aakz)

9 If the LA Times was really interested in this type of tactic/action ... they could have easily taken a trip down to LA County Lock-up for firsthand experience or consulted any halfass criminal attorney! But that's not what this is all about, now is it?

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 02:09 AM (3aakz)

10 Oh.... I'm not Jay.... For the sake of accuracy - Jay added the last two paragraphs to the thread, but this originally appeared on ACLU Watch and was requested that I cross post it to Stop The ACLU.

Posted by: Gribbit at January 30, 2006 02:34 AM (eN1nw)

11 Just noticed something. ACLU (with all its resources) is doing its investigative searches HERE - AND LOOKING FOR DOCUMENTS/PAPER ETC. What! No field work? No office in Iraq? No investigators on the ground? No firsthand interviews, no personal photographs? Always did that in the past. No balls?

Posted by: hondo at January 30, 2006 02:44 AM (3aakz)

12 The ACLU is our biggist enemy this buinch of socialists want it safe for terrorists to be able to blow up a school full of kids and teachers the ACLU is the best freind the terrorists could ever get

Posted by: sandpiper at January 30, 2006 09:23 AM (A2P9P)

13 Gribbit, I've added links to ACLU Watch.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at January 30, 2006 09:29 AM (RHG+K)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

220kb generated in CPU 0.0609, elapsed 0.1921 seconds.
137 queries taking 0.1512 seconds, 640 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.

Search Thingy

Monthly Traffic

Pages: 14535
Files: 52
Bytes: 214.7M
CPU Time: 10:01
Queries: 1545505

Content

Posts: 5690
Comments: 76633

Feeds

January 31, 2006

January 30, 2006

January 29, 2006

Search Thingy

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Blogroll

Monthly Traffic

Content

Feeds