September 24, 2005
Galloway Supporters Want Your Children Dead
I just received an e-mail from the patriot who is
raising money for U.S. troops by auctioning off George Galloway's treasonous book. You can
participate in the auction here. Would it shock any of you to know that he has received a slew of hate mail and fake bids?
Two bidders, I am told are especially guilty of abusing eBay policy and have bid up the price to over 9 million dollars (screenshot below is evidence). They appear to be from the U.K. What do Galloway supporters in the U.K. think of British and American troops in Iraq? Your friends, brothers, and children are, and this is a direct quote, "people who kill women and children for a living."
Ladies and gentleman, your average Galloway supporter! They don't want the troops out of Iraq because they care about your sons and daughters. They want the troops out of Iraq because they hate your sons and daughters. Baby killers, that is their view of the American soldier.
If that weren't enough, our patriot friend continues:
Not only have they found my auction "disgusting", which is quite the compliment coming from those who find suicide bombers as glorious, but they have also expressed to me their wish for every American and British soldier to find their end in Iraqi soil.
These are British citizens, mind you, wishing their own countrymen dead and their troops defeated.
Of course, most of those against the war say they support the troops. There is actually a fair argument to be made that we should end the war because we cannot win, and we should not fight any war where we cannot attain victory. However, this is not the argument being made in D.C. this weekend by these protestors. What they are arguing is that the U.S. is bad, mmmmkay, and then try to dodge their own logic which inevetably leads one to conclude that if the U.S. and its allies are really the bad guys then it is perfectly acceptable to support those that murder them.
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
02:05 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 373 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Yeah, but you know -- they don't support the mission, but they do support the troops.
Posted by: dave at September 24, 2005 02:08 PM (CcXvt)
2
Hmm, count me as unafraid. I can't speak for my comrades, but I can be fairly certain that they, like myself, wouldn't be all that frightened by a handful of anemic British buttstabbers.
Posted by: File Closer at September 24, 2005 02:51 PM (pgXsZ)
3
F--k Galloway, Fonda, Biaez,Pelosi, Reid,Boxer, Durbin and all the other America hating as-holes. Why dont they all go live in Iran if they hate freedom so much? I admit to bias - I have been wanting Fonda and Biaez to leave for 42 years; have always hated both of em, still do.
Posted by: Rod Stanton at September 24, 2005 02:54 PM (tplWd)
4
Frankly we should tar and feather this skunk
Posted by: sandpiper at September 24, 2005 03:22 PM (rAMmL)
5
I saw that email (jayjaychef) somewhere recently. Maybe it was here.
Posted by: Oyster at September 24, 2005 03:24 PM (YudAC)
Posted by: Oyster at September 24, 2005 03:56 PM (YudAC)
7
why does Tony Blair, or even the Queen, put up with George Galloway???...the man practically screams that he is a traitor to his country, and yet they do nothing to stop him....i find it amazing that he still breathes
Posted by: THANOS35 at September 24, 2005 05:13 PM (FMsU7)
8
No, George Galloway is not the traitor, Tony Blair is. He is the one who lied to Parliament and the people of Britain and took them into an illegal war. He is the one who should be tried for treason.
Posted by: Joon Flowers at September 24, 2005 05:18 PM (+/NwA)
9
Joon: please cover your mouth when you talk. Americans aren't used to seeing the results of good English dentistry, and some of us have just eaten.
Posted by: DaveP. at September 24, 2005 07:38 PM (6iy97)
10
go take youre X-Files mentality and crawl back under that rock you came from under, there Joon...and go to Iraq and hold hands with those Religion of Peace terrorists and see how long you live, than tell me who the liar is...oh yea, you wont be able to as you wont have a head anymore...ooops, i looked over that one small thing, hope you would forgive me
Posted by: THANOS35 at September 24, 2005 09:39 PM (FMsU7)
11
Its too bad that they no longer have capital punishment in england george gallaway deserve to be beheaded in the tower of london
Posted by: sandpiper at September 25, 2005 09:24 AM (u2whF)
12
i am the bidder that bid 9 million, after constant pressure the book is now de-listed, so sorry, thanks a bunch but no thanks, have a coke,have a smile and fuck right off!!
Posted by: jay at September 27, 2005 07:09 AM (L1kao)
13
What are you all lathered up about? British and American troops ARE people who kill women and children for a living. It's just a fact.
Posted by: redpecker at September 28, 2005 10:33 PM (FVsHr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Lando, Chewbacca Join Anti-Bush Protest
In a move that has delighted Star Wars enthusiasts and enraged Republicans everywhere, famed intergalactic heroes Lando Calrissian and Chewbacca recently turned up at an anti-war protest in Washington, DC.
Information and images here.
Posted by: Rusty at
01:45 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 44 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Thanks once again for your "link generosity"
Rusty!
Posted by: Buckley F. Williams at September 24, 2005 01:50 PM (O2fD/)
2
I think I would vote against anything or anyone M. Moore supported just on general principle. I put him in the group with the Fondas and Cindy. As-holes all.
Posted by: Rod Stanton at September 24, 2005 03:05 PM (tplWd)
3
You shouldn't insult Chewy that way. I mean come on Moore is hideous.
Posted by: Howie at September 24, 2005 03:23 PM (D3+20)
4
More like Jabba the Hut
Posted by: Howie at September 24, 2005 03:37 PM (D3+20)
5
i never knew that God could pile shit that high...and in TWO, count em, TWO, piles
Posted by: THANOS35 at September 24, 2005 04:54 PM (FMsU7)
Posted by: Lonevoice at September 25, 2005 05:10 AM (+IZZj)
7
Is it my imagination, or has Moore gotten even more slovenly?
Posted by: Oyster at September 25, 2005 08:52 AM (YudAC)
8
ive seen homeless people down at Penn Station in Newark that look better than Mikey Moore
Posted by: THANOS35 at September 25, 2005 09:38 AM (FMsU7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Rita Runs Aground
Rita Has come ashore just east of the TX/LA border. Rita was downgraded to a category 2 about 7:00 CDT. Some damage reported. I also have recieved reports of winds near 100 mph near Beaumont. Several Tornado warnings have also been issued. It's just a wait and see game now.
CNN has a pretty good update this AM.
The NHC said the storm made landfall at 2:30 a.m. (3:30 a.m. EDT) at Cameron Parish, on the extreme southwest coast of Louisiana between Sabine Pass and Johnson's Bayou. Cameron Parish, is a flat marshy area stretching along the coast eastward from the Texas state line...... .....all but a few of the 10,000 residents of the parish evacuated. Damage from the storm was already reported in several locations, particularly Lake Charles, La.
Update:
Good news Rita has been downgraded to a tropical storm and initial reports are good considering. ZERO deaths reported so far and Damage has been less than expected. Reports after Katrina were good too, let's hope this one stays that way.
more...
Posted by: Howie at
08:26 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 279 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Texas dodges a bullet. Rita finishes the job in Louisiana.
Posted by: Carlos at September 24, 2005 09:57 AM (8e/V4)
2
but how much will you bet that the MSM will count those elderly killed in the bus fire as being caused by the Hurricane and blame them on Bush
Posted by: THANOS35 at September 24, 2005 04:56 PM (FMsU7)
3
I win in the battle against the big machine again. Well it took a while. Off the the house Yall have a good night.
Posted by: Howie at September 24, 2005 06:49 PM (D3+20)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Just Step Over The Homeless Guy
I hope Rusty doesn't mind, but I'll be posting here full time on a part-time basis until I get my mu.nu digs.
Or is that part time on a full time basis?
Whatever, I quit the old space.
Don't worry, I won't clutter your monitor with my mindless drivel, because if I can't come up with something like this every day, why, it's not worth posting at all.
*Sigh* I put my site back up.
Posted by: Vinnie at
12:49 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 87 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hey, Vinnie, welcome to Rusty's basement. It's kinda dank and moldy down here and there's all these old Star Wars figures but at least you can post in peace.
DSM swings by sometimes but we can just ignore him.
Posted by: See-Dubya at September 24, 2005 02:07 AM (Z+hKW)
2
Let's go get a bottle of ripple I made 6 bucks panhandling
Posted by: Howie at September 24, 2005 07:09 AM (D3+20)
3
6 bucks? Dude, we can get TWO bottles for that! I'm in.
Posted by: Vinnie at September 24, 2005 07:10 AM (Kr6/f)
Posted by: Howie at September 24, 2005 08:05 AM (D3+20)
5
You guys are such slobs. Boone' s Farm or Old English, please. We gotta keep some standards around here.
PS Vinnie I usually delete DSM when he goes off topic like that. Just a suggestion.
Posted by: See-Dubya at September 24, 2005 08:47 AM (Z+hKW)
6
Why is DSM here but not greg? I would appreciate an explanation. Greg offered unreasonable arguments, but they were arguments. DSM offers verbal shit. What gives?
Posted by: Carlos at September 24, 2005 10:01 AM (8e/V4)
7
Oh, let him bleat. I could care less. Besides, I gotta run out and try and roust up a few bucks so that me, See, and Howie can share a crack whore for the night.
Posted by: Vinnie at September 24, 2005 01:46 PM (Kr6/f)
8
I think DSM's available.
Posted by: See-Dubya at September 24, 2005 04:10 PM (Z+hKW)
Posted by: Howie at September 24, 2005 04:18 PM (D3+20)
Posted by: Oyster at September 25, 2005 08:48 AM (YudAC)
11
Who let the idiot DSM back?
At some point. Someone should mean what they say.
Posted by: greyrooster at September 25, 2005 11:41 AM (jwCcw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 23, 2005
Hurricane Rita hits: Adult Entertainers, Single Mothers Disproportionally Affected
Things were just about getting back to normal in New Orleans. The lushes were out in force, transvestyte hookers were trickling back into the city, and a strip club had reopened to service the needs of armies of insurance adjusters and lonely FEMA workers. There were even rumors of a new
Girls Gone Wild: Hurricane Victims edition about to begin production work. Alas, it will all have to wait. Damn you Rita! Damn you to hell!!!
If you want to see the picture accompanying this story, better check out Riehl World View--and yes, that picture actually was part of a news story. Because journalists are after the important scoops. Notice that both the Reuters story and the pic that Dan Riehl have is of the same stripper. Why do I have the feeling that one Reuters reporter is a very satisfied customer? Reuters :
In a sign that things may be returning to normal in New Orleans, strip shows are back in the city's famous French Quarter.
Erotic dancers and strippers are entertaining crowds of police, firefighters and military personnel instead of the usual audiences of drunken conventioneers and tourists in Bourbon Street's Deja Vu club, which reopened this week.
It's the first strip joint to resume business, three weeks after Hurricane Katrina struck in the worst natural disaster ever to hit the United States.
"It's nice to get back to work, and all these men need some entertainment," Dawn Beasley, 27, a dancer at the club, said on Tuesday night. "They haven't seen anybody but their buddies for two weeks."
The crowd hooted and hollered as women peeled off their tops and gyrated, as customers tucked tips into their G-strings.
But don't you worry. FEMA cards are accepted for lap dances. Via
QandO this
Times Online story entitled
Vote Republican for Free Lap Dances. I knew there was a reason I voted for that guy!:
Interviewed by a reporter for the local TV station, Abby over at Baby Dolls said she had seen many clients using their debit cards. She had nothing but praise for this exercise in government largesse. “A lot of customers have been coming in from Louisiana and they’ve been real happy about the $1.75 beers and they’re really nice.” It was only fair, she added that they should get a little publicly funded help. “You lost your whole house, then, why not?” she said. “You might want some beer in a strip club. There are a lot of guys out there that like to do that.”
With the mandatory evacuation of Houston's adult entertainment establishment, what will thousands of single mothers do to feed their children? Just one more way in which in Bush's America, single mothers are once again affected more deeply by natural disasters. ;-)
Posted by: Rusty at
02:16 PM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
Post contains 478 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Notice, too, that if you click on the pic in Rueters, at the bottom is the clickable link "Buy Pictures".
Posted by: Oyster at September 23, 2005 02:21 PM (fl6E1)
2
Reuters=journalism at its best.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at September 23, 2005 02:31 PM (JQjhA)
3
WTF... is she wearing tube socks?
Posted by: Ariya at September 23, 2005 03:55 PM (noCGr)
4
Bushie is running around there, promising not to get in the way - potemkin loser off-the-wagon punk
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 06:45 PM (VhNDM)
5
SCREECHING DRUNKEN MONKEY!
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 07:16 PM (VhNDM)
6
Tube socks are hot on a girl. I used to have a girlfriend who would wear her softball socks and hat. And nothing else. YEAH BABY!
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 23, 2005 08:52 PM (0yYS2)
7
Potemkin, as in fake prop, Homer
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 10:05 PM (VhNDM)
8
ADULT PSYCHO-ENTERTAINMENT!! I LOVE WAR!!!
New reports of the 82nd Airborne TORTURING IRAQIs surfaces:
"Murderous Maniacs" attacked and tortured!! It was Sport!!
"On their day off people would show up all the time. Everyone in camp knew if you wanted to work out your frustration you show up at the PUC tent.1 In a way IT WAS SPORT. The cooks were all U.S. soldiers. One day [a sergeant] shows up and tells a PUC to grab a pole. He told him to bend over and broke the guy’s leg with a mini Louisville Slugger, a metal bat. He was the fucking cook. He shouldn’t be in with no PUCs."
"Military Intelligence personnel, they said, directed and encouraged army personnel to subject prisoners to forced, repetitive exercise, sometimes to the point of unconsciousness, sleep deprivation for days on end, and exposure to extremes of heat and cold as part of the interrogation process. At least one interrogator beat detainees in front of other soldiers."
SSSSMOKIN!!
The torture of detainees reportedly was so widespread and accepted that it became a means of STRESS RELIEF for soldiers. Soldiers said they felt welcome to come to the PUC tent on their off-hours to “Fuck a PUC” or “Smoke a PUC.” “Fucking a PUC” referred to beating a detainee, while “Smoking a PUC” referred to forced physical exertion sometimes to the point of unconsciousness. The soldiers said that when a detainee had a visible injury such as a broken limb due to “fucking” or “smoking,” an army physician’s assistant would be called to administer an analgesic and fill out the proper paperwork. They said those responsible would state that the detainee was injured during the process of capture and the physician’s assistant would sign off on this. Broken bones occurred “every other week” at FOB Mercury."
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 10:22 PM (VhNDM)
9
Rusty, this piece of shit moron is giving aid and comfort to the enemy and lying about our troops. If you insist on letting him continue, I will not be back.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 23, 2005 10:48 PM (0yYS2)
10
Impy, DSM is your only truthful FRIEND in all the Bushie-Chimpie swirling madness:
http://hrw.org/reports/2005/us0905/ and http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1108972,00.html
They were being beaten by mini-sluggers and more!
You can't get awaaay! You can't get awaaay! Woo-hoo!
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 11:00 PM (VhNDM)
11
DSM, I just shed a tear for the terrorists who got "tortured" by the 82nd Airbourne, no --- I did really.
Did you forget the part where they stepped up the torture to include chinese rope burns, nipple twisters, camel bites and atomic wedges, or will I have to read more later?
Posted by: dave at September 23, 2005 11:57 PM (CcXvt)
12
Davie,
It's all fine and dandy to beat detainees until their friends decide it's fine and dandy to torture Americans back, right?
What goes around comes around?
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 24, 2005 12:21 AM (VhNDM)
13
"It's all fine and dandy to beat detainees until their friends decide it's fine and dandy to torture Americans back, right?" You got your argument backwards, DSM. It was the other way around.
I read your links. TIME, being the anti-American publication they've become, is bound and determined to keep old news alive regardless of what corrective measures have been taken to curb or stop abuse. What you and they want are public hangings. Nothing less would shut you up. Isn't that a little hypocritical?
You won't
EVER see a TIME article outlining any of those corrective measures. It's the same old mantra in their headlines "Abuse!" - never "20 New Iraqi Hospitals Open". You'll never read the word "terrorists" in their stories. It would dilute their message. They prefer "insurgents" or "resistance" to describe them and soften the blow of their horrendous acts committed against soldier and civilian alike. And HRW uses moral equivalence to an astounding degree. Unless they start documenting and condemning Palestinian human rights infractions, they are just mouthpieces. Until HRW takes a stance on the murder and maiming committed by terrorists instead of whether they're being treated kindly enough when caught, they can climb up my arse and fight for air.
From the mysterious "former Captain":
"We had these new high-speed trailer showers. One guy was the cleaner. He was an Iraqi contractor working on base. We were taking pretty accurate mortar fire and rockets and we were getting nervous. Well one day we found him with a GPS11 receiver and he is like calling in strikes on us! What the fuck!? We took him but we are pissed because he stabbed us in the back. So we gave him the treatment. We got on him with the jugs and doused him and smoked and fucked him."
All this from a guy who gleefully participated? This guy's not a whistle blower. He's trying to save his own neck.
And your "chickenhawk" arguments are nothing but empty insults because you, yourself, seem to have plenty to say about something you have no firsthand experience of, so you can't say what you'd do. Just what
would you have done? Give the guy a massage? I think they should have put a bullet between his eyes.
You are so single minded and hell bent (not to mention the fact that you NEVER contribute a coherent message because you hate everyone and everything equally) that no one here can take you seriously. You're an absolute joke. How long have you been spouting off here and have yet to win a single convert with your nonsensical, regurgitated crap?
It really scares me that you're out there walking around among sane people. [shudder]
Posted by: Oyster at September 24, 2005 07:36 AM (YudAC)
14
Hey Oyster,
Common sense says don't torture or they'll torture back. Want an all-out mob war over there with no friggin rules? Mad Max rules? Want captured American soldiers burned alive in front of video cameras? Hell No! War is hell and we are becoming frigging barbarians beating people to death. Want war? Go pick up a 16 and go over to that rotten place.
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 24, 2005 07:47 AM (VhNDM)
15
Wow, Oyster. I've never seen such dissembling in the name of supporting torture. To wit:
1. It's a liberal media outlet. (Ignores the fact it's information provided by a credible source, a participant and troop member.)
2. He participated and is trying to cover his butt. (What precisely does this do in terms of making the story true or untrue? There's more than one whistleblower. Whether they participated or not, they are still a whistleblower and pretty damnhonest to admit they were involved.)
To use your own wording against you: it really scares me that people like YOU are out there walking among sane people. Soulless ghouls should only be out on Halloween.
Just cut the crap and say it: you support torture as long as it furthers your goals.
Posted by: Anne at September 24, 2005 08:47 AM (ERpL1)
16
I guess you'll say it for me, Anne. Since I said no such thing.
Posted by: Oyster at September 24, 2005 03:28 PM (YudAC)
17
Oyster does everyone just like fith with you or what? I've not noticed you being too radical but then again this is the Jawa Report.
Posted by: Howie at September 24, 2005 03:34 PM (D3+20)
18
People seem to put words in my mouth a lot lately, Howie. They have their own ideas and unless I shouted from the rooftops exactly what they want to hear then they'll take my words and make them into something they can spout their indignance at.
It's the recognition of their selective reasoning that gets them upset. These are the people who quickly and vocally condemn anything the US military does and don't just as openly give, at the very least, equal voice to wrongs done "to" the US military. But they support the troops! In a nut shell, if we do something wrong, it's bad, if they do something wrong, it's because of something we did.
Anne "assumes" too much. She assumes I endorse torture because I disapprove of TIME'S efforts to keep alive issues that have been and are being addressed without saying that they are, in fact, being addressed. I never said the Captian was lying, but because I question his motives and point out his own guilt (which he pointed out himself) she assumes many things. One, that I imply his story is untrue and then she goes on to defend him for his "honesty". That's fine. But, it doesn't erase his guilt and it doesn't make it right for TIME or anyone else to continue to beat that drum which emboldens their "insurgents" and feeds the flame of anti-American sentiment. But heaven forbid if "I" defend anything. Becuase
"I'm wrong".
I guess I have to spell out in elementary terms that I believe torture is wrong. But let me add that I think it's wrong for ANYONE, not just us. The double standards just don't cut it.
Regarding my above post and the story of the guy who was caught with the GPS - Anne was indignant over the fact that the guy was beat up, but didn't have anything to say about him directing mortar attacks on the soldiers?
These people don't realize that our defense of the military or anything American didn't spring out of a void. It was born out of incessant verbal attacks that focused on one thing; America bashing to the exclusion of all else. And I'm just one of those people who are sick of it.
Posted by: Oyster at September 25, 2005 08:46 AM (YudAC)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Hamas Blows Up Hamas?
Be careful don't step on the bo.........
ABCNEWS.
A pickup truck carrying masked Islamic militants and homemade rockets blew up at a Hamas rally Friday, killing at least 10 Palestinians, including children, and wounding 85, hospital doctors and witnesses said
Uh, Can you say Natural Selection?
Posted by: Howie at
01:00 PM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Why am I giggling?
That's just wrong, but funny.
Posted by: elliott at September 23, 2005 01:11 PM (XlQVK)
2
Evolution in action.
Darwin would be proud.
Posted by: Lonevoice at September 23, 2005 01:48 PM (KeO+G)
3
"Um, can you say Natural Selection?"
I'll try. "Give them a state."
How'd I do?
Posted by: Defense Guy at September 23, 2005 01:50 PM (jPCiN)
4
DG that ws good but is that not like handing a two year old boy a stick and saying, "Now don't hit your Sister with that!!".
Posted by: Howie at September 23, 2005 01:55 PM (D3+20)
5
They were the smart ones too.
Dirk Dirk Allah....
Posted by: Filthy Allah at September 23, 2005 02:07 PM (5ceWd)
6
Monkeys don't have guns because they never evolved far enough to invent the concept of the gun, and I don't think too many people would think that it's a good idea to give guns to monkeys, because if they don't understand the concept, they can't be expected to use it responsibly. By the same reasoning, arabs should not be allowed access to anything more dangerous than rocks and sticks, because they obviously haven't evolved much farther than monkeys in the area of personal responsibility.
The difference between a peaceful arab and a fanatical jihadi is that the peaceful one simply lacks the means to cause harm, but if you get enough peaceful, unarmed arabs together, they become a raging mob, burning and murdering as they go for no reasons other than ability and opportunity. Given all the above, I'm amazed that some psychopathic goathumper hasn't touched off one of Pakistan's nukes yet, but I don't think we have long to wait.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 23, 2005 02:55 PM (0yYS2)
7
Those, my friend, are the essence of Islamotards.
Posted by: Vinnie at September 23, 2005 03:24 PM (Kr6/f)
8
"Give them a State" - Now that they have one we know where they are, and how many MOABs to send over.
Posted by: -keith in mtn. view at September 23, 2005 06:42 PM (T85lV)
9
Impy, you racist twistnutsack violence-mongering chimp-worshipper, the Arabs were studying in university when your ancestors were using rocks as skin scrubbies. Monkeys do have guns, look at the Chimp-in-Chief, a drunken sod simian loser who only knows how to divide people and break things. You're a worshipper of a Chimp!
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 08:01 PM (VhNDM)
10
Obviously the work of Zionists! They must have created a device to remotely detonate the Palestinian's...uh...protest devices.
Posted by: kbiel at September 23, 2005 08:08 PM (sKedi)
11
DSM we had guns before them though. Barbarians had iron before the egyptians.
Posted by: Howie at September 23, 2005 08:18 PM (D3+20)
12
Evolution sveletion its what happend when one lives by the bomb they die by the bomb
Posted by: sandpiper at September 23, 2005 08:45 PM (2cLBb)
13
I think it's about time to ban this ignorant fuck before I have to hunt him down and gut him like a fish.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 23, 2005 08:51 PM (0yYS2)
14
Impy, you fish-gutter and rage-in-a-cage, you gotta calm down before the worms squirming through your rattler brain start viciously fighting each other. All the pills prescribed but not taken are swirling about in a pharma-cloud ghost like in flying baloney: you can't get away! You can't get away! woo-hoo! Chimpety-drunk is dancing about left and right on your tin foil hat, crinkly crinkly.
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 10:04 PM (VhNDM)
15
bwahaha! I love breakfast in the morning to headlines like this. Makes the rest of my day. I can't honestly say I feel that bad about the children either given they were probably just terrorists in training.
Posted by: Carlos at September 24, 2005 10:11 AM (8e/V4)
16
DSMoron claims others are worshiping Bush. But in truth he sticks up for and worships the muslim dogs. He is lower than shit and should be tried and hung for his traitorism. Maybe when this war is over we can call the DSMs to task for their crimes against this country. Perhaps they are writing their own death warrents. It is called aiding and abetting the enemy and that is exactly what the dog is doing.
Posted by: greyrooster at September 26, 2005 10:17 PM (6krEN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
An Evening With President Bush
Hello America, I'm Larry King. My guest tonight is President Bush who is with us to talk about emergency preparedness and the federal government.
Mr. President, I noticed that the federal agencies have managed to respond much more quickly to Hurricane Rita than they did to Hurricane Katrina. Is that because they learned their lessons during Katrina? Or is it possibly because of the firing of Michael Brown?
President Bush: Well, Larry, I really don't think it's either. We just wanted to get there faster this time. After all, I can't let all those innocent people get killed right there in my home state. I might decide to run for Governor again.
King: So you're saying that you have more sympathy for the people caught in Hurricane Rita?
President Bush: Why heck yes. Didn't you hear my interview with Wolf Blitzer? And not only did we manage to get rid of all the Negroes, but did you know that New Orleans was filled with fornicators? That's a biblical word for people having sex. And according to my buddy Jerry, we can't let people do that. As a matter of fact, I'm going down to Florida next week to have a talk with my brother about why he evacuated all those homosexhuals from the Keys. Why he let the perfect opportunity to rid his state of most of the rif-raf slip straight through his fingers.
more...
Posted by: Drew at
12:23 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 741 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Do you sub for Scrappleface? You should!
Thanks for the afternoon chuckle.
Posted by: Retread at September 23, 2005 02:17 PM (mtsTe)
2
Dude, someone is going to happen on this post and think this blog is a Soros subsidiary.
Posted by: Oyster at September 23, 2005 02:29 PM (fl6E1)
3
You finally found a way to read Bushie Drunken-Chimp's mind!
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 06:47 PM (VhNDM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Terror Suspect Arrested at U.K. Airport

A man was arrested today at the Manchester, U.K., airport under Britain's new tougher anti-terrorism laws. Reports are conflicting at this point as to the exact circumstances of his arrest.
This report claims the man was 'Asian', which in England usually indicates some one from the subcontinent--Pakistan or Indian.
[Image: AP]
Fox News reports that the man was arrested for acting suspiciously and apparently resisting the quesioning--a stun gun had to be used to subdue the man (hat tip Confederate Yankee for e-mailing me):
According to SKY News, a man was seen acting suspiciously at the airport, and was subsequently approached by authorities, who used a stun gun to arrest him after he resisted.
Army bomb units were then called in to investigate the suitcase, and the BBC reported that a controlled explosion was carried out.
This report indicates that the man might have been on the runway with the package:
Greater Manchester Police said the man had been seen acting suspiciously in the area where aircraft were parked.
The British Broadcasting Corporation reported that a man with a suitcase had been seen walking under an aircraft.
This report indicates, though, that the man was caught after he ran through a security checkpoint:
A man was arrested by police today after he ran through a security post at Manchester Airport and got within 60 metres of an aircraft.
While the man was initially arrested under the Terrorism Act, he is now being held under the Mental Health Act. So, either he's crazy or a crazy terrorist.
Posted by: Rusty at
11:57 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 260 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Different news outlets implying different scenarios? Say it isn't so!
And we're to accept their word as gospel. Mkay.
Posted by: Oyster at September 23, 2005 02:32 PM (fl6E1)
2
Ah, the religion of the peaceful inner struggle strikes again.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 23, 2005 02:56 PM (0yYS2)
3
"So, either he's crazy or a crazy terrorist" ... or both!
Posted by: Don Miguel at September 23, 2005 05:44 PM (UAn5X)
4
A lost tourist trying to get home
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 10:06 PM (VhNDM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Hostage Forced to Bash Bush
Roy Hallums will be on 60 Minutes this Sunday. Here is some of what he says in the interview, from a CBS Press release (thanks to
Tall Glass of Milk):
I didn't like the videos going out," says Hallums, "because I knew my family would probably see them and I hated for my daughters to see me in that situation," he tells Stahl.
His captors also sought his family's telephone numbers to ask for a ransom, says Hallums, putting a pistol barrel in his mouth and threatening to kill him. "I knew if I gave them the number, they would call them and ask for moneyÂ…and I didn't want [my family] to deal with a call like that."
Hallums was kept in a crawlspace below a farmhouse for most of the 10 months, a space he estimates at 9 feet by 11 feet and just over 4 feet high. At times there were several other hostages. "Most at any time is about nine people....You've got nine people and their breath and humidity, just living with nine people you don't know," recalls Hallums. He was blindfolded and bound the entire time.
And this from the
NY Post, from the same interview (thanks to
lawhawk):
A civilian contractor who was kept in a stifling crawl space by his Iraqi abductors for more than 10 months was beaten before being forced to make videos slamming President Bush for being indifferent to hostages, he says in his first interview since his rescue.
You will recall that Susan Hallums had said that the Bush-bashing didn't seem like Roy at all. His family always believed Roy had been forced to make those statements.
For past coverage, visit the Roy Hallums Archive.
Posted by: Rusty at
11:26 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 289 words, total size 2 kb.
1
So, this means that the terrorists who abducted Roy Hallums share the political views of NBC, ABC, and CBS?
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 23, 2005 12:14 PM (RHG+K)
2
Very funny. Anyway, You don't need Einstein to figure out that roy was forced to bash Bush. The same thing happened to Douglas Wood. If a terrorist tells you to either bash Bush or die, you will naturally bash Bush.
Posted by: George at September 23, 2005 01:21 PM (hrpbg)
3
Fabrizio Quattrocchi didn't. Of course, he's not alive anymore either. But that man had steel ones.
Posted by: Oyster at September 23, 2005 02:35 PM (fl6E1)
4
Yes Bluto, that's EXACTLY what it means; the terrorists, the worldwide media, the dhimmicratic party, and the world socialist/communist movement are all on the same sheet of music.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 23, 2005 02:58 PM (0yYS2)
5
Over half of America calls Bush on his blunders, no guns needed.
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 06:48 PM (VhNDM)
6
Thats the only way they,ll let him on 60 minutes TICK TICK TICK TICK TICK KABOOM
Posted by: sandpiper at September 23, 2005 08:47 PM (2cLBb)
7
Over half of America? Gee, who elected him then? Oh, that's right, it was the JOOOOOOOoooooOOOooooOOOOOOOOooooozzzzz! Liberals are just stupid fucktards who should be killed to prevent them from further contaminating the gene pool with their diseased DNA.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 23, 2005 08:54 PM (0yYS2)
8
Join Kooky Klanrooster Impy and chomp down on da Gubbamint cheese pie.
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 10:07 PM (VhNDM)
9
Who allowed the piece shit Downing Street Moron back on this blog? Thought we got rid of that America hating faggot.
Posted by: greyrooster at September 24, 2005 09:02 AM (jwCcw)
10
Mr. Hallum's story really resonates for me at the moment.I'm trying to imagine being in a crawl space like he was.It's particularly vivid at the moment since there are people on all fours slithering around our crawl space to fix the mold problems we've been having. They tried to start a couple of days ago but were confronted by HUGE spiders, some the size of your fist so they had to bomb the space first and have now returned. Unlike Mr.Hallums, they take lunch breaks and are paid 25.00 an hour -- not enough to lure me under there.
I sure hope they get to see his story.
As for bashing ol' Bush, he's become inured to whatever anyone can dish out. Bet he reads Lincoln biographies to maintain.
Posted by: dymphna at September 24, 2005 03:02 PM (H0GVm)
11
If a re-election was held tomorrow. George Bush would again be elected. The leftist dogs make a lot of noise, but thats all.
Posted by: greyrooster at September 25, 2005 12:37 PM (jwCcw)
Posted by: ryan baumann at December 03, 2005 10:10 AM (v0chN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
World of Wind Too
I just wanted to clarify my earlier post, so that people don't get the idea that "those people" are all in the same category. I got another call from an elderly black woman who said that she had registered for financial assistance under her old address because she had been told to do so by the call agent. Apparently her old address was the one on her driver's license. She was eligible for assistance under her new address, but her call wasn't to apply for assistance again. She just wanted to correct her record in case the person living at her old address might be prevented from applying for aid because of the double count. She gained nothing from the call. She was simply concerned about someone else, and about fairness.
There are also a lot of people in the "affected area" who would be in pretty dire straits were it not for the Red Cross assistance. It's not as though there's much of a functioning economy there, and believe it or not landlords are ejecting people onto the street if they don't pay their rent on time. There are others with acute medical problems. One woman had a dental problem that had become abscessed because the dentist she went to wouldn't treat her until he had been paid in advance. We arranged to pay her bill through a local Red Cross chapter, but the abscess had already advanced nearly to the point of becoming systemic. Yet this dentist just couldn't bring himself to do any pro bono work. I'm afraid I don't understand that language very well either.
Also, the main reason Red Cross doesn't have any Service Centers in Louisiana is that the state and local governments refuse to invite us in. They don't want to "look bad" because they can't provide their citizens all the services they need, even though... you know, they can't. We have feeding centers and shelters, but no Service Centers to dispense financial assistance in Louisiana, although there are Centers in Mississippi and Alabama. This fact drives people in Louisiana nuts, because they think it's our fault we're not in their state.
Selfishness and goodwill both have many faces.
(Cross-posted by Demosophist to Demosophia)
Posted by: Demosophist at
11:14 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 379 words, total size 2 kb.
1
So this would in part account for why some people bash the Red Cross when aid doesn't arrive. So they aren't letting you guys in? That's just plain sick. The state government has been telling them for so long that they'll take care of them, when they really don't, and now that federal funds are pouring in almost unchecked they want to look good to make up for lost time. It also provides a cover and a reason for why they haven't been doing what they said they would do all along. They can always just say they never got enough funds before. I don't know if it's FEMA or Blanco who is trying so hard to hang on to power they won't let other agencies help as much as they're capable of.
Posted by: Oyster at September 23, 2005 02:47 PM (fl6E1)
2
Yes, Yes - the principle of profits over people - free markets and spoils to the victors - how's that for trickle-out-of-ReaganBush's screes and Screeching Monkey's compassionate NEGLECT OF THE PEOPLE!!!
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 07:20 PM (VhNDM)
3
This further illustrates why it's 99% of blacks/liberals/muslims, et al, who give the other 1% a bad name.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 23, 2005 08:56 PM (0yYS2)
4
Um, DSM, I wasn't talking about Bush or free markets. I'm talking about humanitarianism as well as Demosophist is. Dude, what planet do you commute from? Sometimes your comments are entertaining and sometimes you're just a mindless twat. Feck off.
Posted by: Oyster at September 23, 2005 09:00 PM (YudAC)
5
Bush's levee robbery and drunken delays led to humanitarian disaster, get it?
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 24, 2005 12:22 AM (VhNDM)
6
Red cross is every where in Mississippi except the right places. They have old ladies driving $100,000 rescue vehicles up and down the road asking if we want some cold pasta and peas. Meanwhile we are cooking hogs and steaks on the outdoor barbecues. Getting low on beer. We tell red cross they are in the wrong neighborhoods. We are fine. We take care of each other. We tell them to go to Pass Christian, Gulfport or Bay St Louis. They are not needed here. They just stare back with unbelieving eyes. Blacks in this area (very few of them and fixing to be less of them) are all to busy standing in lines for FREE MONEY to work. We are paying $250.00 per day to workers and need hundreds. Not one black from New Orleans has accepted a job. We now have 9 crews out and not one black needs a job as long as de govment hands them food and money.
Poor management here. I am transferring to St Louis, Mo today to help the coast guard. Will be staying ate the mansions across from the arch. Any locals the needs a beer on me just answer. This has been a very hard three weeks. I have lossed my home totally, my dream boat is gone. Fema is burning the bodies of my dead cows. Hundreds of large live oaks are down on my farm. All fences torn apart. But still we are blessed. A COUNTRY BOY CAN SURVIVE. No hotels, motels in hundred miles. All elderly and young children stay in my motor home for reasons of comfort. The rest of the gang are camped out in whatever at my place. We have allready built some 8 by 12 cabins that are powered by generators. Humitity is unbelieveable. Only solution is drink lots of cold beer. Kids staying cool by swiming in my catfish ponds. I am sending out scavengers for beer this after noon. No looters here. Problems allready taken care of.
Posted by: greyrooster at September 24, 2005 09:24 AM (jwCcw)
7
Rooster good to hear you are OK. We was a bit worried well cept for DSM. Welcome to the midwest enjoy yer stay I suggest a trip to Deirdorf and Hearts for a big old steak while you are in St. Louie.
Posted by: Howie at September 24, 2005 10:04 AM (D3+20)
8
http://www.dierdorfharts.com/
Posted by: Howie at September 24, 2005 10:09 AM (D3+20)
9
Very good to hear you're okay Rooster. Sounds like you lost a lot though. I'm sorry to hear that part. Thanx for some real insight into what's happening. Must of been hard to get to an internet connection, but I'm glad you tried.
Posted by: Oyster at September 25, 2005 07:40 AM (YudAC)
10
Oyster and all. No telephone service, power in my area. Nor are we expecting any soon. I am at the mansions in St Louis, Mo. Immediately across from the arch. The hotel has internet connections in the lobby. Very handy.
Going to try and purchase computer today.
Any computer geeks out there that can help me as to what to buy. Computers are my son's bag and he's still in Iraq.
I know nothing. Purchased some computer mags but don't know what they are talking about.
Suddenly decided to wait a day or so to purchase new one as I know my friends out there will help me.
I will try DIERDORF'S AND HEARTS for a steak. Thx Howie.
Looking out the window I see thousands of people passing by on fourth str headed for the Rams game. I will give St Louis a 9 on good looking ladies. Particularly, the ones in Tee shirts walking in the rain.
My friend Mark Johnson of Vinton, Louisiana took my boat (Dream Machine) to Sabine Pass, Tx for safe keeping the day before Katrina hit. Turns out to be another bad move.
Don't know which is worse, losing my pride and joy fishing boat or finding out that someone has allowed the Downing Street Moron back.
Today is Sunday. Hard to believe that last Thursday I was out in the Mississippi Sound looking at bodies in the water near Sand Island.
Miss my family and my precious dogs. Still haven't located big Bubba, my angus bull. Fema says some of my cows may be in holding facilites in Tylertown, Ms. I have ear tags so perhaps some can be salvaged. Fema hired local cowboys to catch loose livestock. Fema has done a better than expected job in my area. They immediately started gathering dead animals and burning the bodies.
Many horror stories coming from New Orleans. The news media has been ordered not to show to worst of it. My neighborhood pulled together. I am most proud of them. Estimated time to hire a contractor to rebuild. 1 year. Insurance companies showing how heartless big business can be. I suspect some hard time for those in catch 22 situations. Insurance companies inventing excuses you cannot believe to avoid paying. My heart goes out to those who haven't had the ability to save.
Later.
Posted by: greyrooster at September 25, 2005 12:15 PM (jwCcw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Antisemetism and Soft Bigotry Against Muslims
I listened to George Galloway on Michael Medved's show the other day. While he seemed indignant when Medved was about to accuse him of antisemetism (which Medved never got around to doing) it is clear the Galloway, and many on the Left are, in fact, antisemites. He kept obsessing about 'Israeli publications' and went on and on about Sharon's Zionism--without ever mentioning that Zionism has historically been a Leftist movement and that Israel's wars with its neighbors have invariably been led by Labour. Zionism, then, is not a right-wing movement.
George Galloway is an antisemite, plain and simple.
One does not need to believe in the 'Final Solution' to be an antisemite. The core of antisemetism is not 'hatred of Jews', rather, it is the belief that Jews are responsible for the ills of the world. Read Mein Kampf and it becomes apparent that Hitler actually believed in a Jewish conspiracy. Speaking of the Social Democratic Press of his time Hitler writes:
From publishers on down, they were all Jews.
Hitler could not accept democratic liberalism because it was just a front for Jews. How is this different than George Galloway who now believes the Labour Party is a front for Zionism? That wars are fought for Zionism? That the reason the Arab world has made so little progress is Zionism?
Galloway may not wish the final solution, but at his core he hates the thought of Jews with any amount of power. Jews are fine, if they know their place.
There is another way in which world wide antisemetism raises its ugly head: the double standard. Jews are expected to be paragons of virtue.
Every. Single. One.
When a single Jew commits an act of terrorism, for instance, the state of Israel is blamed--even when Israel arrests the man and there are mass protests against him. At the same time, when a Muslim commits an act of terrorism in Palestine, and the Palestinian Authority does not act against him, and there are mass rallies to support him, the world turns the other way or worse--condemns Israel as the 'root problem'.
The world's antisemetism has an inverse corollary: the soft bigotry of low expectations from Muslims. Muslims, it is believed, are incapable of acting like civilized human beings.
Charles Johnson made a similar point yesterday:
IÂ’m reading this again, and wondering where the hell is the worldÂ’s outrage about this? Newsweek prints a false rumor that a Koran was dunked in a toilet, and the entire planet goes nuts. Hamas announces that theyÂ’re going to turn a Jewish house of worship into a memorial to mass murder ... and the silence is absolutely deafening.
Today,
The Astute Blogger opines:
The fact that the world EXPECTS Muslims to go nuts and run amok in a violent rampage based on a RUMOR about a Koran being flushed down a toilet, AND that the world says NOTHING when Muslims torch and descecrate synagogues and then publicly announces that they'ee gonna turn them into a museum glorifying genocide, PROVES that most people are CONVINCED that most Muslims are uncontrollably violent, racist gencodial maniacs. They've come to expect the worst from Muslims.
He is absolutely right. To hold Muslims to a lower standard is a form of bigotry. It is the bigotry that assumes that Muslims are something like children, not capable of proper behavior.
Let us not fall victim to this soft bigotry against Muslims. We should not hold them to a higher standard than we hold ourselves, but neither should we hold them to a lower standard.
UPDATE: More on George Galloway's possible perjury before the U.S. Senate here.
Posted by: Rusty at
09:02 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 612 words, total size 4 kb.
1
So Galloway hates da JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSsssssss!
All lefties despise da JOOOOOOSSSssss ! What else is new.
Lefties hate America, Jooooos, Walmart, Capitalism, Jooooos, Bush, Blacks, NASCAR(Fuck Yeah),rednecks, COORS Lite, ToBy Keith, Bruce Willis & Steak. Oh, and JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSsssssssssssAH! And Christiansssssssss....
Is it any Suuuuprise that Galloway is a lefties wet dream? Huffington is all moist in the diaper with the prospect of having this "hero" to her home for dinner, fawning and lite petting.
Posted by: Filthy Allah at September 23, 2005 09:21 AM (5ceWd)
2
I also heard the interview. Galloway was no different than a comment troll, throwing insults and weird conspiracies, and then when Medved would start to strike back, going all contemplative and wondering why Medved "was so hostile".
A real bag of human filth.
As to whether Galloway wants the final solution...
Maybe not today, but when he gets his wish and the Jews "know their place", maybe he decides an even better place would be the inside of a cattle car. I think it's happened enough times that we can call it a trend.
Posted by: a4g at September 23, 2005 09:42 AM (2GSc/)
3
OT:
Am I the only one getting tired by the conspiracy nuts who think the WTC were destroyed by Bush & Co?
I can't even read the comments about movies on IMDB without idiots constantly putting forth theories, each one wackier than the last?
It would be all well and good if they ever stuck to a theory, but the same people that claim the U.S Government can pull a plan worthy of "Dr. Evil" with the destruction in plain site of the WTC / Pentagon on one board, then go to another and complain about the gross incompetence of the Hurricane relief, and talk about how the Government cannot deal with an emergency on the scale of September 11th? which is it retards?
/rant off.
Posted by: dave at September 23, 2005 10:40 AM (CcXvt)
4
Wait, you mean there are theories that DON'T attribute the WTC collapse to Bushitler? /sarcasm
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at September 23, 2005 11:18 AM (JQjhA)
5
These quotes by Galloway and some postings on DU following his testimony before the Senate are really alarming. Is the mainstream left really embracing the kind of trash people like Galloway are dishing out? If so this really is a cause for concern. Not just in this country, but more so in Europe. Mainstream liberalism is going off the deep end.
“Of course, the past masters of government sponsored terrorism were the Zionists, who created the condition in the Arab countries, and in some European countries to stampede the Jewish populations out of the countries they had been living in for many hundreds years and get them into a Zionist state.” Galloway
“The Zionist movement, as it is well documented, funded Hitler before World War Two and many of the figurehead of Zionism were not and are not Jews.” Galloway
And these commemts On Democratic underground regarding Galloway”s testimony before the Senate:
Can We Make This Man A Citizen? - Unbelievable
mhr May-17-05 12:46 PM #1
This is the most beautiful thing I've heard in years.
Warpy May-17-05 01:04 PM #16
Would he want to be one?
NewJeffCT May-17-05 01:21 PM #31
I nominate that we make Galloway an honorary American citizen.
brainshrub
May-17-05 04:44 PM #105
Better yet make him an honorary DUer. He is our kind of
jwirr May-17-05 06:00 PM #132
I Second
Snotcicles May-17-05 08:13 PM #161
Don't think he'd want to
tavalon May-17-05 11:51 PM #197
seriously...
imax2268 May-19-05 12:01 AM #275
Thanks for the link !
REACTIVATED IN CT May-17-05 12:47 PM #2
Ditto! I just sent him the following e-mail:
mom cat May-18-05 08:26 AM #237
Posted by: Brad at September 23, 2005 11:30 AM (3OPZt)
6
So let me get this straight. Zureikat is Galloway's "friend", in fact, he runs Galloway's charity org, Miriam Appeal. But he has to call his "friend" to whom he has bequeathed much responsibility and ask a very basic question,
"Well, I'm trying to reach him to ask him if he's [Fawaz Zureikat] ever been involved in oil deals because I don't know the answer to that." He doesn't know? Trying to reach him? [*coughbullshitcough*]
Then he says,
"I certainly know that he has been a supplier of very many things to very many ministries in Iraq, in the old regime through the Oil for Food programme from the Agriculture Ministry to the Trade Ministry and many others." But he doesn't know if Zureikat had any deals in oil?
Yet, he told Senator Coleman that not only did he know that, he was quite public about that fact? And now Seixon has uncovered that he "didn't" emblazon it in his literature?
He also admits to Jerry Paxman of the BBC,
"I had access, as you very well know, at the highest level of Iraq's political leadership."
Sounds to me as if he was likely in the cookie jar up to his gorgeous elbows.
And the leftward kooks want to make him a citizen?
I know, I ask too many questions. If it wasn't so serious, I'd laugh.
Posted by: Oyster at September 23, 2005 03:39 PM (fl6E1)
7
Galloway punishes Senators and other Gimps like you.
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 07:21 PM (VhNDM)
8
Rusty it's time to ban this moron. He's gotten stupider than greg.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 23, 2005 08:57 PM (0yYS2)
9
Impy, join the 82nd in Iraq and have fun on a torture spree!
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 10:27 PM (VhNDM)
10
George Gallay gose to PLEASURE ISLAND he plays pool he somes cigars he eats and eats he throws away hsi school books he burns the US flag and he turns into a donkey he has made a ss of himself thats becuase he always has been a ass it just took him to do something this dumb to realise it
Posted by: sandpiper at September 24, 2005 08:15 AM (ciw10)
11
Downing Street Moron: You are an outright liar.
Posted by: greyrooster at September 25, 2005 12:33 PM (jwCcw)
12
We don't believe that Israel is responisble for all the world's ills. Just Palestinian's.
Posted by: Odelisk8 at September 26, 2005 05:33 PM (JC1vU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
B!*ch Rita Update
The landfall point has become well defined this morning.

The good news is that the traffic situation has appeared to have improved. I dug through a few traffic cams in Houston and didn't notice the sea of red lights like I've seen the past two mornings. This map shows vast improvements:

According to Fox News this morning the oil industry has popped smoke from the region. They are out of there and for good reason too:
AT 4 AM CDT...0900Z...THE CENTER OF HURRICANE RITA WAS LOCATED NEAR LATITUDE 26.8 NORTH...LONGITUDE 91.0 WEST OR ABOUT 290 MILES SOUTHEAST OF GALVESTON TEXAS AND ABOUT 250 MILES SOUTHEAST OF CAMERON LOUISIANA.
RITA IS MOVING TOWARD THE NORTHWEST NEAR 9 MPH...AND THIS GENERAL MOTION IS EXPECTED TO CONTINUE FOR THE NEXT 24 HOURS. ON THIS TRACK...THE CORE OF RITA WILL BE APPROACHING THE SOUTHWEST LOUISIANA AND UPPER TEXAS COASTS LATE TODAY OR TONIGHT.
MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS ARE NEAR 140 MPH...WITH HIGHER GUSTS. RITA IS AN EXTREMELY DANGEROUS CATEGORY FOUR HURRICANE ON THE SAFFIR-SIMPSON SCALE.
May God bless the Gulf Coast.
Originally Posted at
Posted by: Chris Short at
05:59 AM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 185 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Boom shaka boom shaka boom shaka boom - - Rita is coming for Harken and Spectrum 7 - God says to skip Houston, swipe Sugarland and rain hard on Crawford...
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 07:03 AM (VhNDM)
2
Still haven't shown me the dead white guy floating in New Orleans - couldn't find one.
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 07:41 AM (VhNDM)
3
BUSH is drinking again!! He's fallen off the wagon.. "Stop, George, Stop! It's Jim Beam or Me! What about the twins??"
Screw it Laura, the dry drunk is wet again, lickin the scotch off his salty lips and leering at Bianca most lecherously - "Bianca, Bianca?"
http://news.baou.com/main.php?action=recent&rid=20531
Slammin' back the Hellibacon Sling, the wildass drunk rages on and on!!!!!
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 07:51 AM (VhNDM)
4
Always amusing when the Commie dogs come in and piss up every thread they find, is it territorial thing DSM? don't forget to wipe the foam flecks from your chin retard.
Posted by: dave at September 23, 2005 08:50 AM (CcXvt)
5
And you can bet that the eco-freak green nuts at wacko groups like GREENPEACE will say its americas punishment from GAIA for not wanting any part of the junk science inspired KYOTO TREATY what a bunch of jerks GREENPEACE is i will have nothing to do with these eco-wacko green nuts
Posted by: sandpiper at September 23, 2005 08:56 AM (uPdgJ)
6
DSM,
Did you forget to take your medicine?
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 23, 2005 10:02 AM (rUyw4)
7
Hey DSM
You certifiable dickhead, go to this website. About halfway down there sure as shit looks like a dead white guy from Katrina but the bigger question is are you suggesting the hurricane is racist or are you pissed off because your miserable unhinged ass thinks not enough white people died.
And you call the Rooster a racist.
http://cryptome.org/katdead-01/katrina-dead-01.htm
Posted by: disgruntledinca at September 23, 2005 11:49 AM (IpG/2)
8
Still haven't shown me the dead white guy floating in New Orleans - couldn't find one.
Still haven't shown me your airline itinerary for your trip to Texas to help out.
Chickenhawk.
Posted by: Brian B at September 23, 2005 05:04 PM (CouWh)
9
Disgruntled Pinka,
Gubbamintrooster is still on the loose and RAGING MONKEY is slinging back the hooch, drunkenly ruining America.
No dead whitey seen, as everyone photographed face down in Bushsludge is black. Not one dead whitey - Kanye was right - those poor enough to be compassionately left behind to drown were almost exclusively black. Shame on Bush.
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 07:39 PM (VhNDM)
10
Shame you aren't face down in a puddle.
Posted by: Oyster at September 23, 2005 09:06 PM (YudAC)
11
Oyster,
was that yer blog I ran across today?
Posted by: Howie at September 23, 2005 09:14 PM (D3+20)
12
Oh wow we have you linked, duhhh
Posted by: Howie at September 23, 2005 09:31 PM (D3+20)
13
What goes aroung come around.
Posted by: Lester Lewis at September 23, 2005 10:06 PM (zaiMD)
14
What goes around, comes around.
Posted by: Lester Lewis at September 23, 2005 10:07 PM (zaiMD)
15
Torture, lester, torture
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 24, 2005 12:23 AM (VhNDM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Indictment in Lodi Islamic Terror Probe
(Sacramento, California) In the ongoing three-year probe of the alleged Lodi, California, Islamic terrorist cell, five people have been implicated and, of those, three have been deported for immigration violations and two are being held in federal custody without bail.
Last month, 47-year-old Islamic cleric Muhammad Adil Khan and his son were deported for overstaying their visas. On Wednesday of this week, 39-year-old Islamic cleric Shabbir Ahmed was deported for the same reason. The three were deported without being charged with any crimes, however, the government alleged that they intended to set up a terror training camp in Lodi. It's noteworthy that both Ahmed and Khan are allegedly linked to Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda.
The two being held in custody, charged with lying to federal agents, are 23-year-old Hamid Hayat and his father, 47-year-old Umer Hayat. In a development yesterday resulting from a federal grand jury hearing, prosecutors charged Hamid Hayat with providing material support to terrorists.
From MercuryNews.com:
The federal indictment alleged that Hamid Hayat, 23, provided material support and resources for carrying out international acts of terror between March 2003 and June 4, 2005, when he was arrested days after returning to the United States from Pakistan. Hayat faces multiple charges for which the combined maximum sentence is 31 years in prison.
"Today's charge centers around the fact that Hamid Hayat attended a terrorist training camp in Pakistan in 2004, returned to this country with the intent of committing jihad against America, and by doing so provided material support to terrorists," U.S. attorney McGregor Scott said.
more...
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
03:56 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 494 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Sup man? You don't love my blog anymore?
Posted by: Chris Short at September 23, 2005 06:05 AM (0OCQY)
2
As I said here 4 months ago in the discussion of "the religion of peace". When the Muslim community and its "leaders" come out against the terrorists in Lodi I *may* give some credence the the MSM/DNC bull shit about "religion of peace".
Of course NoCal's most famous muslin is the son of a PG+E executive VP, the murderer of Johnny Spaim, the darling of Nancy Pelosi - Johnny Walker. Who BTW is not Scotch.
Posted by: Rod Stanton at September 23, 2005 06:15 AM (tplWd)
3
How many countries has he invaded and bombed???
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 07:04 AM (VhNDM)
4
How many has Bush invaded and bombed?
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 08:02 AM (VhNDM)
5
DSM,
How many countries did Ted Bundy invade and bomb? Is that supposed to be an excuse for murder? Oh, judge, I didn't invade or bomb any countries, so you have to let me go.
Whatever you say about Bush, it doesn't justify terrorism against anyone. And yes, if you come to the US and try to practice the jihad shit, we are going to get your ass.
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 23, 2005 10:15 AM (rUyw4)
6
DSM wrote: "How many countries has he invaded and bombed???"
Invaded: 1 (he's here with hostile intent)
Bombed: 0 (because they caught him beforehand)
"How many has Bush invaded and bombed?"
Answer: 0
I helped invade Iraq, and I didn't see the President anywhere. Henry Rollins came to visit our camp, though. How evil does that make him?
Posted by: File Closer at September 23, 2005 02:26 PM (pgXsZ)
7
Seems like Khan is a bad name all around. Genghis Khan, AQ Khan, Muhammad Adil Khan, Chaka Khan, ...
Posted by: Oyster at September 23, 2005 03:43 PM (fl6E1)
8
C'mon Jesusland and Mind-closer
Drunken Monkey is a screeching terrorist, playing bomb-and-seek with the people of Iraq. Why not bomb Boston to wipe out the Irish Nationalists there who openly fund the IRA? Your BushGod is a criminal drunk, an indefensible weasel.
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 07:43 PM (VhNDM)
9
Resorting to name-calling, DSM? Since you started it, here's one for you: DSM = Double Stupid Moonbat.
Having got that out of the way, I would like to address one of your "points":
"bomb-and-seek with the people of Iraq."
Sigh.
So how much time have you spent in Iraq, then? Just wondering, since you seem to be such an expert.
PS: I'd love to bomb Boston, but just to make sure the hated Patriots don't dominate the AFC again this NFL season!
Posted by: File Closer at September 23, 2005 10:28 PM (pgXsZ)
10
File Cruiser,
You want to bomb Boston?! Why, why - that's a 'Terra'ist' statement... and now, you....you must call Cherty and Brownie's DHS and report yourself! Pack a toothbrush and learn Navy Hospitality!!
Iraq is a twistnut place: http://www.thedossier.ukonline.co.uk/video_iraqwar.htm scroll down to "Secret US Plans for Iraq's Oil" and for sick laughs, Bremner Byrd and Fortune's fact-based skits.
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 11:48 PM (VhNDM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Larry King Isn't the Smartest Guy I Know
I was having my midnight meal earlier and sat down to watch TV while I was eating. The Weather Channel was on a commercial break as was Fox News. I decided to put it on CNN and there was a nice graphic showing projected path and strength data for Hurricane Rita. Turns out the weather expert was being interviewed by none other than Larry King. Larry King is a journalist and rumors are abound about how much of a jerk he is but the only thing I have against him is that his show is on CNN.
I wasn't really paying attention to what Larry King was saying; I was studying the map. Then out of nowhere Larry King says something to the weather expert that's being questioned that really got my attention:
I thought mountains stop a hurricane. I don't see any mountains there.
Yes, Larry; mountains will stop a hurricane but it certainly isn't the only thing that will stop a hurricane. This is for you Larry King.
Originally Posted at
Posted by: Chris Short at
03:19 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 189 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Where is Klanrooster? Gubbamint Cheese eatrin' racist whacko
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 07:42 AM (VhNDM)
2
Unholy Screeching Monkeys!! BUSH is DRINKING AGAIN!!!
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 08:18 AM (VhNDM)
3
Yeah all you have to do is listen to LARY KINGS LIES to know that
Posted by: sandpiper at September 23, 2005 08:53 AM (uPdgJ)
4
what a sad post.Truly
not to side with LK or another person,does Dr.Rusty think he know everyting..He still surely doesn't know one main truth of this decade..-->that Mr.Bush is going dumber and dumber day by day
Sorry to say
**************
Not a democrat/republican.Just an outside view.
Posted by: Rocker at September 26, 2005 06:08 PM (YxeqH)
5
It's too bad you're blaming Rusty for something he didn't write.
Speaking of intelligence...
Posted by: Chris Short at September 26, 2005 06:59 PM (0OCQY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
A World of Wind
I'm working at a Red Cross call center and got a couple of calls today that I found upsetting. They struck me the same way Patrick McGoohan's character in
The Prisoner must have felt when he drank a mug of ale and, just as he was draining the last few dregs, the words "You have been poisoned" appeared on the bottom of the tankard. The first of these incidents involved a call from a girl who said her brother had been dropped off in some Texas coastal city by the crew of the boat he had been a seaman on, and the people who were supposed to pick him up to evacuate him away from the dock didn't show. I spent about half an hour attempting to track down telephone numbers for state and private services in Texas who her brother might be able to contact to get a ride out of the city, but the problem was that she hadn't talked to him in well over an hour, and for all we knew he'd alreadly been evacuated. She said that she'd talked to the State Police who had refused to help. Anyway, it was clear that she wasn't satisfied with what I was able to do, so I asked her whether she expected the Red Cross to launch a helicopter to rescue her brother. This was my best imitation of the Jack Nicholson character in
As Good As It Gets, so I expected at least a little break in the solemnity, but from her outraged response it was clear that I had inadverntently hit upon exactly what she expected. She called me every name she could think of and then suggested that I needed to think about what I'd have thought had it been one of
my family who was stranded. Then she hung up before giving me time to say that my sister had already been through Rita.
more...
Posted by: Demosophist at
02:05 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 781 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Hayek said we're on the road to serfdom. Seems like you've talked to people who have always been there. Sheesh! I couldn't imagine a more frustrating job than to have to respond to those folks all day long.
Posted by: mike at September 23, 2005 04:06 AM (M7kiy)
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 07:31 AM (VhNDM)
3
Gone with Bush's wind and down the hatch with the Margeritas..
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 08:19 AM (VhNDM)
4
So what have you done to help, DSM?
Posted by: Brian B at September 23, 2005 09:03 AM (CouWh)
5
Hey Brian Bubba,
DSM knows what not to do to help - don't loot millions in levee money to pay for imperialist war, steal national guard troops and cop a drunken "Don't George!" vacation when Category 5 hurricanes destroy America's cities. Don't hire numbnuts for FEMA and especially, don't divert critical rescuers and helicopters to serve as mission accomplished backdrops when people are DYING. Your BushGod is a gutter sod.
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 07:48 PM (VhNDM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NY NewsDay Poll Regarding IFC
Just received an e-mail from my friends at
Take Back the Memorial regarding
a poll at New York NewsDay. The poll asks:
Freedom Center backers say it will help people understand 9/11 sacrifices. VictimsÂ’ families say controversy surrounding the museum will dishonor the dead. Do you think it belongs at the WTC site?
Do the 9/11 families a favor and vote no when you get a chance.
Posted by: Chris Short at
01:17 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 77 words, total size 1 kb.
1
NO! Unless they plan to throw it in the hole and use it for base fill. I'm getting tied of looking at a hole in the ground.
Posted by: hondo at September 23, 2005 01:27 AM (4Gtyc)
2
Got the same email, I also have the article
that comes with the poll up as well
http://www.angelfire.com/ky/kentuckydan/CommitteesofCorrespondence/index.blog?entry_id=1088994
Posted by: Dan Kauffman at September 23, 2005 03:17 AM (hxRR8)
3
Give it back to the indians!
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 07:32 AM (VhNDM)
4
We could fill the hole with liberals, throw a tarp over it, and tap off all the hot gas to power an eternal flame sort of monument.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 23, 2005 09:06 AM (0yYS2)
5
I honestly believe that DSM alone puts out enough hot gas to do the job. Ha!
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 23, 2005 03:47 PM (rUyw4)
6
Maybe a gigantic bronze statue of a cowboy hat-wearing, vacationing Bush flipping both birds to rows upon rows of upright coffins of the Americans he let die. Shameless, blindered bastard!
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 07:50 PM (VhNDM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 22, 2005
The Duty to Support the Troops and Their Mission

There are things worse than losing a loved one in war, although that may be hard to imagine. Victory gives meaning to the death of a loved one. Their death becomes sacrifice when something noble is built out of the ashes of war.
The great tragedy that was Vietnam was that so many died. And for what? To see South Vietnam fall to a Stalinist dictatorship, hundreds of thousands rounded up for re-education, and the spread of communism (or worse) in Southeast Asia. The vanity of their deaths cannot be laid at the feet of the soldiers they fought with. No, we are to blame.
There is an unwritten pact between soldier and citizen in a democratic nation. The soldier puts his life at risk and the citizen supports the soldier and his mission and gives him whatever tools are necessary to win it. Whatever remains of what was once referred to as 'the glory of war' is still found in victory. The purpose of war is still to win.
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
10:55 AM
| Comments (28)
| Add Comment
Post contains 639 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: Chris Short at September 22, 2005 09:11 AM (0OCQY)
2
Me too. Well put, Rusty.
Posted by: Oyster at September 22, 2005 11:13 AM (fl6E1)
Posted by: Howie at September 22, 2005 12:40 PM (D3+20)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 22, 2005 03:38 PM (0yYS2)
5
How sad that this needs to be said at all. We're fortunate to have you say it so eloquently.
Posted by: justamomof4 at September 22, 2005 05:26 PM (7auSQ)
6
so now they're pulling a switheroo on that good ol' wartime sloganry design that's served us well for so long? I think you fellas better find something that rolls off the tongue a bit better. support the troops
and their mission! That just doesn't flow, boys. And it's simply too much to remember amid all the flying emotions of an anti-peace rally. I venture to suggest my own magnanimously conceived bit of sloganry that encapsulates the entire 'MO' of diffusing US-style democracy & liberation throughout the middle-east, and makes good symbolic use of the brotherhood lingo--this is it: "FREEDOM ROCKS!" There! Don't you see this is all you need as far as slogans go! Whatever it is, "Freedom rocks!" has it covered--patriotism, primacy of liberty, Islamic oppression sucks, brotherhood of man, no religion too, all that. I urge you to take my advice and dispose of your complicated propagandistical appeals to men and their missions. Your main concern is selling a idea, and my superior symbol encompasses everything and more, and it can of course be easily altered to suit the tastes of your particular target demographic. The hip-hop subculture might prefer something in the vein of "Freedom is da' bomb," or "Freedom got game!" for the urban playground ballers. Or "Freedom ain't wack!" for the shot callin skeptics. As for the liberal elite, im afraid you've already lost the battle there, what they need is guilt. Your ". . .and support their mission" is just gonna breed more self-destructive cynicism, so that's probably a positive outcome from your perspective. So I'll make one final suggestion for the ones working so hard to orchestrate our downfall: "Freedom is the shit." A bit coarse and crude, but that's what appeals to the liberal elite right? KISS principle, right? Keep It Sexy Shithead.
Posted by: mustafaak at September 22, 2005 08:10 PM (jWaQK)
7
Thank you, Rusty. Well said. The weasels, traitors, and defeatists will be out in force soon, so we must be prepared to defend our troops.
We MUST NOT EVER let our troops be disrespected like they were during the Vietnam War. If I ever see one of those weasels disrespect one of our troops, I swear I won't be responsible for my actions. I will hurt the weasel, male or female, it matters not to me.
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 22, 2005 08:13 PM (rUyw4)
8
Here's Mustafaak in his own words on 6-7-05:
...but all the bullshit about peace and non violence-that's just to keep the overseers off our back.
Rusty, I believe you have a good chance to get that fatwa you've been wanting for so long. I believe we have one of the little jihad wanna-be shits right here on the Jawa.
Rusty, you mean old dude, I didn't know you were an overseer. LOL!
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 22, 2005 08:42 PM (rUyw4)
9
Mustafaak wins the prize!
I thought that DSM or one of the new guys, like BushPig, might have had a shot at being the first to vomit up a long-winded, nearly unintelligible respone to this post, but the dark horse came from behind to win it! Go Mustafaak!!!
Posted by: File Closer at September 22, 2005 08:51 PM (pgXsZ)
10
overseers yes! sharade! you pinned the tail right on the camel! I'm glad somebody's with me
Posted by: mustafa at September 22, 2005 09:15 PM (jWaQK)
11
Mustafa,
Please tell me that English is not your first language. What the hell did you say? And please, be precise.
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 22, 2005 09:58 PM (rUyw4)
12
" ...twas brillig and the slithy toves did gyre and gimble in the wabe..."
That makes far more sense than mustafa's insensible rant, but I guess that's the price you pay for goat-borne syphilis. They say senility comes before the chronic incontinence.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 22, 2005 11:11 PM (0yYS2)
13
I couldn't agree more with this:
There is an unwritten pact between soldier and citizen in a democratic nation. The soldier puts his life at risk and the citizen supports the soldier and his mission and gives him whatever tools are necessary to win it. Whatever remains of what was once referred to as 'the glory of war' is still found in victory. The purpose of war is still to win.
But I can't help but notice that you don't define "win" in this post. What is a "win" in Iraq in 2005? Establishing a democratic (and Islamic) republic? Allowing the breakup of the state into squabbling and weak fiefdoms?
How long might we stay to achieve this "win?" How many more soldiers must be killed and maimed to do it? How do you propose to keep troop levels where they need to be to secure -- if not a victory, then at least security? How do you propose we pay for it?
And in a democratic Republic, any such mission must rest on the consent of the citizenry. Are they still behind this mission?
Posted by: stickler at September 23, 2005 01:22 AM (hZJsR)
14
legally licensed to issue fatwas in 7 states and abroad. diggit.
Posted by: Mustafa at September 23, 2005 01:57 AM (jWaQK)
15
Greetings Jawa Readers,
Perhaps there is some grave and deep semantic misunderstanding about the concepts of supporting troops and supporting the ongoing Iraq war.
Simply put, troops are people and war is a state of armed conflict. One may support or not support one with or without the other, as they are independent variables, i.e. support of y is not a function of support for x.
Two short questions from this vet:
Is it wrong to say that troops can be supported by those working hard to make it politically possible for them to return safely to America?
Is it wrong to be honest with them about the real reasons they have been sent to fight in Iraq?
I would like to see them come back to America forthwith.
Posted by: Collin Baber at September 23, 2005 05:01 AM (uRNNR)
16
We all want to see them come back. But if you do not support the cause, you cannot give your support wholly to the troops.
Not supporting the mission gave rise to the abuse the troops recieved when they arrived back home from Vietnam. That and the massive propaganda that was fed by the machine about supposed atrocities. Troops recieved NO SUPPORT from the gov't or the people (the ones who spoke up, anyway) and look at the resentment it gave them towards their country when they returned...and who could blame them.
Ask that question again Collin.
Posted by: kermit at September 23, 2005 06:37 AM (DX+fh)
17
Yeah BABLLLAR!!!! Answer the goddamn question you twisty-head numnut! BUSHIE hates the troopers and feeds'em into the flying zarqawi shrapnel - GET REAL - Screw Vietnam, we're buying stuff from 'em even after we bombed'em for 15 years and let Klanrooster shoot 'em up in the jungle. Death is death and victory is bullshit for those who die because they can't enjoy it. THEY'RE DEAD!! Stop believing Bush's BIG LIE!!!
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 07:37 AM (VhNDM)
18
Quothe mustafa, Valentino of goats: "legally licensed to issue fatwas in 7 states and abroad. diggit."
Great! I'm licensed to hunt down rabid dogs, feral pigs, and muslims, we should get together sometime.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 23, 2005 09:04 AM (0yYS2)
19
"There is an unwritten pact between soldier and citizen in a democratic nation."
Why only soldier and citizen? That leaves out the people making decisions. The people in the Pentagon Papers.
Leaving them out is a great way to avoid accountability.
Posted by: actus at September 23, 2005 09:59 AM (y/f3P)
20
Collin,
Here's the deal. In almost every instance with very few exceptions, the people who support the troops also support the war. People who don't support the war rarely ever support the troops.
There's a reason for this. The liberals who oppose the war oppose war period, no matter the provacation. They were against the war on the Taliban, mainly because they somehow think they can manipulate these people. I could go on, but why? You get the picture.
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 23, 2005 10:31 AM (rUyw4)
21
" They were against the war on the Taliban, mainly because they somehow think they can manipulate these people."
that war had a 90 some percent approval rating. the one we're fighting in has nowhere near that support.
Posted by: actus at September 23, 2005 10:57 AM (y/f3P)
22
Actus,
I doubt it. I don't think you could get 90% of the people in this country to agree that the sun comes up in the East, and I'm not trying to be obtuse.
The Left was against the war in Afghanistan from the start, and although some liberals did half-heartedly support the war, as soon as a few Taliban were killed they opposed it. The liberals and leftists here in the US see the jihadists as their natural allies against Christianity and conservatives. The problem will come for the Leftists if and when their allies attain a level of success. Britain and Europe are good examples of this, as Muslims have reached a level of success that allows them to murder and bomb their fellow citizens with little or no repercussions.
A good example of what I'm talking about: The Left attacks Christians who oppose gay marriage but align with Muslims who support the execution of homosexuals. Go figure!
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 23, 2005 04:03 PM (rUyw4)
23
actus: I think it's mostly because some people can't "connect the dots". Our attackers were clearly defined after 9/11. But must we wait to be attacked before taking action? Who would have been happy had thousands more died from another attack in say Los Angeles, and afterwards we find that Iraq had a hand in it? Why must we only do something "after" American citizens are killed?
We were damned if we invaded Iraq and damned if we didn't. At least now we aren't counting the dead in our streets. Not to say that soldiers lives aren't precious, but they took on the job of protecting the homeland. And regardless of what "you" believe or what "you" argue, personally, I believe something far worse on our own soil has been averted as a result of the invasion.
You're entitled to your opinion and no one would dream of denying you that. I can even understand why you may feel the way you do. Why can't you extend the same courtesy? You understand your own thought processes which brought you to your own opinion, yet, you cannot understand why someone else may come to a different conclusion. Your process of reasoning is merely different, not necessarily correct.
Your comments are terse and unrevealing. They are rarely, if ever, defended with facts, links or reasonable discourse. And I see more often how you "don't" comment when facts are presented in a cogent manner with references and back up. You wait until you can take a statement out of the context of the entire post and bring up some obscure point that wasn't made clear enough to you, but everyone else seems to get it. When was the last time you vocally agreed with anything here at all? Or are you afraid you'll dilute your negative message with something positive? Your M.O. is clear. Every time it's different with you so no one can really communicate clearly with you.
Posted by: Oyster at September 23, 2005 04:17 PM (fl6E1)
24
'I doubt it. I don't think you could get 90% of the people in this country to'
sorry. its true. look it up.
"Why can't you extend the same courtesy?"
What the hell are you whining about?
Posted by: actus at September 23, 2005 09:00 PM (Zi15r)
25
Ah, just as I thought. Terse and no content. Good job, actus. I pegged you right.
Posted by: Oyster at September 23, 2005 09:14 PM (YudAC)
26
"Ah, just as I thought. Terse and no content. "
some of us get to the point. sorry.
Posted by: actus at September 23, 2005 10:02 PM (Zi15r)
27
Mr. Actus:
I'm not talking about some dumn poll. You know as well as I that these polls don't measure support in a meaningful way. Please tell me that you are not that shallow.
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 25, 2005 03:13 PM (rUyw4)
28
"I'm not talking about some dumn poll. You know as well as I that these polls don't measure support in a meaningful way."
There were lots of polls and indications that the war in afghanistan had overwhelming support. But its not as meaningfull as your 'doubt.'
Posted by: actus at September 25, 2005 08:07 PM (QPrcU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Houston & Galveston Webcams, Traffic Conditions, & Evacuation Routes
The following are a list of resources for those in the Galveston or Houston area. They include an evacuation map, weather information, traffic conditions map, traffic cams, and other live webcams. Expect the webcams to go off air as wind speed increases.
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
10:26 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 152 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Your first link to the Houston area traffic map brings up a map of San Antonio..............
Posted by: justin at September 22, 2005 09:52 PM (mJbsy)
Posted by: ! at September 23, 2005 07:00 AM (hif5L)
3
http://blog.mu.nu/cgi/mt-tb.cgi?__mode=view&entry_id=122122
Posted by: Angalee at September 23, 2005 07:29 AM (SiXjf)
4
Mother Nature is a mother.
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 07:38 AM (VhNDM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Iraqi Journalist Murdered
(Mosul, Iraq) Another Iraqi journalist has been killed, bringing the total number of murdered journalists to
over 40 since counting began in March 2003.
From AlertNet.org:
A journalist from Radio Nineveh was gunned down on Wednesday night in Mosul, 390 km (240 miles) north of Baghdad. Hospital and police sources said Ahlam Younnis was driving in a car with her husband, who was also killed, and her son, who was wounded in the attack.
In the past week, two other journalists were also
killed in Mosul. Firas Maadidi, Mosul bureau chief for
As-Saffir newspaper and chief editor of the daily
Al-Masar was gunned down, and Hind Ismail,
As-Saffir reporter, was found with a single gun shot to her head.
These were brave people murdered by criminals. Yet the mainstream media (MSM) continue to characterize these heinous crimes as valueless deaths by sanitized 'insurgents.' Where's the outrage? These people were journalists! Civilians doing their jobs! And, all along, the MSM ignore the horrible crimes and avoid attaching responsibility to any group other than the nebulous ill-defined 'insurgency.'
more...
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
10:15 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 309 words, total size 2 kb.
1
An excellent point. Van Gogh redux. From another chattering class. Where are those journos who were decrying U.S. "assassinations" of journalists? What is the principle they stand for? Evidently it is not press freedom. The principle is opposition to the U.S.
Posted by: slickdpdx at September 22, 2005 11:22 AM (MjGRu)
2
Oh dear, you are just raging to the choir... It reminds me of the part of the book Watership Downs when the intrepid band of rabbits come across a very healthy and well fed colony of fellow rabbits. Only problem was that some left the hutch and never came back but, they never speak of it because, after all, the ones that remain are still healthy and well fed...
Posted by: babs at September 22, 2005 11:44 AM (hrGMt)
Posted by: Howie at September 22, 2005 03:54 PM (D3+20)
4
That's just how them rabbits are.
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 22, 2005 04:01 PM (rUyw4)
5
Well over here in blighty it made the news. As mike said "These people were jounalists. Civillians doing their job" However when two Reuters journalists were killed by US troops their deaths were almost lauded. In fact they were lauded. Double standards, dont you just love them.
Posted by: conor at September 23, 2005 03:39 AM (4PPsx)
6
Conor,
"Over here in blighty it made the news". Well, ok, how much criticism was evoked at the "Michael Moore Minutemen" for the murder of these two journalists. Hmm...I can see it now. It was all the fault of Chimpy McBushhalihitlerBurton.
That's what I thought. Yep, them double standards are hell!
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 23, 2005 04:11 PM (rUyw4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Air America Begs For Bucks
It seems that Air America is in real trouble now. Ladies and Gentlemen The Jawa Report will be taking predictions on just how long they will last. Post your prediction below. First prize will be your choice of an original R5D4 or Death Star Droid action figure. No you canÂ’t have Yoda, Luke, Power Droid or the original Darth Vader carrying case they are mine all mine.
more...
Posted by: Howie at
09:11 AM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
Post contains 118 words, total size 1 kb.
1
They'll be off the air by Christmas.
Posted by: Captain Ed at September 22, 2005 09:22 AM (EqQmC)
2
Libs and tote bags go together like Tim Burton and Johnny Depp.
Gone by St. Patrick's Day.
Posted by: Mr.Flix at September 22, 2005 09:26 AM (2M6YL)
3
I'm predicting a Soros bail out. They will not go off the air.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at September 22, 2005 09:26 AM (JQjhA)
4
I'm going to predict that Soros will try to bail them out, realize they're a money hole, and bail out of the bail out. Their last day on the air will be on April 1st, and the last remaining stations to go off the air that day will be here in Eugene, New York, and Austin, Texas. Garobuffalo will cry, Frankenliar will rage, Randy Rhodes will take a final potshot that goes over the line into sedition and find her ass in Gitmo, and the boradcast day will end with Barbara Streisand's rendition of "Nearer my Gaia to Thee".
Posted by: Brian B at September 22, 2005 09:48 AM (CouWh)
5
Umbrage, Rusty. "Umbrage," I say!
I smacked Air Idiot's copping NPR's fundraising schtick
yesterday afternoon.
I sent a note to Maloney and the clown turned around and ripped me off.
Posted by: TC@LeatherPenguin at September 22, 2005 10:00 AM (kiH79)
6
Na Na Na Na
Na Na Na Na
Hey Hey
Goodbye!
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 22, 2005 10:03 AM (rUyw4)
7
I hope Soros bails the goofs out. That will be more wasted money by him, and less to spend on the next campaign.
For some reason campaign laws don't apply to Soros. Go figure.
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 22, 2005 10:31 AM (rUyw4)
8
Furious George will keep it up and running at least throughout the '06 elections. Then when they lose miserably, and only then, will he pull the plug.
Posted by: Oyster at September 22, 2005 11:08 AM (fl6E1)
9
I think Air America will get a big shot in the arm from the Peter, Paul and Mary fundraiser. After Puff the Magic Dragon, Mary will put down her Bratwurst and double fudge chocolate cake and choke out “Blowin in the Wind” one more time.
The combination of her huge girth and complete physical decay will force Mary to struggle to get the words out and breath in enough air to keep her massive frame oxygenated. This scene will leave even the most hardened conservative in a true state of giving.
The same people who poneyed up in the 80Â’s to support the Sandinistas will throw their change in the guitar case once again. This shot in the arm should keep Air America going until Â….Jan 27th 2006.
Posted by: Brad at September 22, 2005 01:43 PM (3OPZt)
10
Isn't it amazing how communist propaganda cannot survive when subjected to the democracy of the market? And yet, idiots like Perfesser Nostril Von Peckersnout refuse to see this. Could it be because liberals are anti-democracy? Naaahhh...
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 22, 2005 01:57 PM (0yYS2)
11
That tote bag is sucky-looking. This is really just wishful thinking, but I think November 9th is a good day for AA to go teets up.
Posted by: Maureen at September 22, 2005 02:59 PM (ny5O/)
12
Maureen,
I was thinking face down, and six-feet under!
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 22, 2005 03:14 PM (rUyw4)
13
Limbaugh said it best, conservatives
earn money, Libs
raise it.
Posted by: Carlos at September 22, 2005 06:17 PM (8e/V4)
14
Big mistake on my part:
Peter, Paul and Mary sang “Where Have All The Flowers Gone. Ole yellow teeth Bob Dylan sang Blowing in the Wind. Sorry BOB and PPM.
I can almost hear the strumming guitar and the beautiful voices at the fundraiser Â…..
Where have all the accounts payable funds gone?
Long time passing
Where have all the cash on the warehouse credit line gone?
Long time ago
Where have all the money from the Boys and girls club gone?
Gone to graveyards every one
When will they ever learn?
When will they ever learn?
Posted by: Brad at September 22, 2005 06:47 PM (3OPZt)
15
Not to rip on Dylan at all, because Desire is one of my all time top 20 albums/CD'S
Posted by: Brad at September 22, 2005 07:44 PM (6mUkl)
16
Brad, I would caution against eating any brownies purchased at an Air America Back Sale.
Posted by: V the K at September 23, 2005 07:55 AM (kZVsz)
17
Will they start those annoying pledgebreaks like they do on PBS? OH PLEASE SEND US A COOL MILLON DOLLAR OR WE WILL DISAPEAR AND FOR YOUR COOL MILLION DOLLAR DONATION YOU WILL GET A YEARS SUPPLY OF GRANOLA BARS AND GARDEN BURGERS PLUS DVDs OF BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE AND FARINEHT 9-11 AND A COPY OF STUPID WHITEMEN
Posted by: sandpiper at September 24, 2005 08:21 AM (ciw10)
Posted by: christopher williams at December 03, 2005 10:08 AM (v0chN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
161kb generated in CPU 0.0506, elapsed 0.0695 seconds.
41 queries taking 0.0357 seconds, 275 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.