April 05, 2005

Pakistani Nuke Maker A.Q. Khan met Osama bin Laden

Holy freaking schneike! No, this doesn't mean bin Laden has the bomb. What it does mean is that state sponsors of terror, like Pakistan was (and to a lesser extent still is) have (or had) the motivation if not the means of passing on WMD to terrorist organizations.

Via Chad at In the Bullpen who has more analysis here. Sifi (Indian website):

Pakistani scientists Abdul Qadeer Khan and Sultan Bashiruddin Mehmood had held meetings with Osama bin Laden and other Al-Qaeda leaders, exchanged letters with militant organisations like the Lashkar-e-Toiba and attended their gatherings and rallies, a media report said.

Posted by: Rusty at 04:43 PM | Comments (14) | Add Comment
Post contains 117 words, total size 1 kb.

1 This is not good.

Posted by: Collin Baber at April 05, 2005 06:16 PM (FV4oJ)

2 No it's not. But it's a new revelation about a very old meeting. So, we shouldn't get too uptight about what we cannot change. In the future, though, let's not take such revelations as lightly as we did in the past 20 years.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at April 05, 2005 06:37 PM (JQjhA)

3 A.Q. Khan went to the DPRK thirteen times.

Posted by: Collin Baber at April 05, 2005 07:14 PM (FV4oJ)

4 Not. Good.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at April 05, 2005 08:50 PM (ywZa8)

5 Mike Scheuer, who knows Osama better than anyone, said that invading Iraq has been a godsend to Bin Laden's groupies. The British Parliament echoes Scheuer's sentiments in saying, "Excessive use by the U.S. forces of overwhelming firepower has also been counterproductive, provoking antagonism toward the coalition among ordinary Iraqis". Basically, we, the United States are funding and operating a massive terrorist training camp over there, drawing in violence and chaos. Zarqawi, motivated to avenge Abu Ghraib's sickening prisoner abuse, has attacked the prison twice in two days. Stories of the G.I. scooping brains out of a skull with a spoon is not helping matters, especially when such deviant behavior is unpunished.

Posted by: Collin Baber at April 06, 2005 01:04 AM (FV4oJ)

6 Is this Khan fellow still walking free? He should be in a dungeon.

Posted by: Carlos at April 06, 2005 07:45 AM (tFXpR)

7 He is under house arrest in Pakistan and kept from talking to U.S. investigators.

Posted by: Collin Baber at April 06, 2005 07:46 AM (fufbw)

8 >>>"Stories of the G.I. scooping brains out of a skull with a spoon is not helping matters, especially when such deviant behavior is unpunished." Collin, because they are precisely that, just stories. Stories propagated by fools. Sorry, I don't mean to insult you, it's not my style. But there's no better word for someone who believes and then propagates such nonsense. And by stating that GIs should be "punished" you go beyond merely passing on hearsay. You're claiming the truth of the matter.

Posted by: Carlos at April 06, 2005 07:51 AM (tFXpR)

9 >>>"He is under house arrest in Pakistan and kept from talking to U.S. investigators." Collin, this sounds very likely. Do you have a link?

Posted by: Carlos at April 06, 2005 07:54 AM (tFXpR)

10 I can verify that A.Q. Khan is under house arrest in Pakistan.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at April 06, 2005 08:05 AM (JQjhA)

11 Rusty, can you verify that U.S. officials have been kept from talking to him? That's what you said.

Posted by: Carlos at April 06, 2005 08:09 AM (tFXpR)

12 sorry Rusty, that was to Collin.

Posted by: Carlos at April 06, 2005 08:09 AM (tFXpR)

13 Colon Babler the traitor continues his lying. This dog will lie with anyone against the U.S. Garbage, pure garbage.

Posted by: greyrooster at April 06, 2005 06:07 PM (CBNGy)

14 Per the New Kerala of India: "United States intelligence agencies have attempted to interview Khan about his activities but Musharraf - who pardoned Khan in 2004 for illegally selling the nuclear goods and put him under house arrest - has refused to allow the US access to him. Even publicly, Musharraf has acknowledged that he cannot allow this questioning as it would jeopardize his own position considering the esteem in which Khan is held by the general public."

Posted by: Collin Baber at April 06, 2005 06:24 PM (FV4oJ)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
21kb generated in CPU 0.0155, elapsed 0.1139 seconds.
118 queries taking 0.1069 seconds, 258 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.