October 31, 2005
Uh swamped.
Due to incredible demand for links and also due to my crushing will it never end schedule another linkfest. LetÂ’s see gotta do that and this and this and that too. IÂ’m also on Chili & Trick or Treater detail tonight. Whew!!! I swear I wonÂ’t do another one till Friday.
Israel vs Islamic Jihad.
FOXNEWS: Israeli forces encircled a house in the West Bank town of Qabatiyeh after sundown Sunday in pursuit of two militants linked to a deadly homicide bombing in central Israel last week. The two men opened fire on the troops and tried to flee the house, so the soldiers opened fire and killed them, the army said
Iranian opposition calls Mahmoud Ahmadinejad a Moron. Ok so I can agree with that.
FOXNEWS:Ahmadinejad's remarks harmed Iran. It was irresponsible and illogical," said Rajabali Mazrouei, a prominent reformer and former deputy. "We can't be more extremist than Palestinians themselves".
Paris Riots Continue. Nope Jihad Watch is not down.
UN Security Council passes resolution against Iran.
CNN:The resolution is under Chapter 7 of the U.N. Charter, which holds open the ultimate possibility of the Security Council considering the use of force with failure to comply. Speaking in Monday's meeting, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said the resolution "made it clear that failure to comply with these demands will lead to serious consequences from the international community." She called the Chapter 7 resolution "the only way to compel the Syrians" to cooperate
Yahoo trolls Howie to click on this with the title “Iraqi VP’s Brother Killed”. Actually it was a bunch of MSM whiny crap.
Michelle Malkin has a Trick or Treat bag full of Info and links on Judge Alito. See Balloon Juice on the upcoming debate that is going to happen like it or not.
In case you are wondering about the gang of fourteen He sure don't seem extraordinary to me so far.
Is Joe Wilson a lying troll? Up yep looks that way.
Hat Tip: Jawa Readers.
Scary!!
Califonia Conservative: a mighty coalition consisting of Jacques Chirac, Gerhardt Schroeder, George Galloway, Cindy Sheehan, Michael Moore, Sean Penn and Martin Sheen, all led by the U.N.’s Kofi Annan, would’ve written some very forceful correspondence using the strongest language known to diplomacy — maybe even produced an accompanying music video.
Really Scary.
Dear readers, itÂ’s a time to puke.
Posted by: Howie at
02:15 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 393 words, total size 3 kb.
October 28, 2005
Friday Link Dump & Open Thread.
And as last week a big thanks to all the guest posters and regulars who have helped out this week.
I linked you all here last week.
Well except Jane. If IÂ’ve missed anyone please email me. LetÂ’s all pat ourselves on the back. ItÂ’s hard to find people who will work for Republic credits. Did anyone else have problems with those at the bank? They ran me off. Something about they only take Imperial credits now.
If you have a post you want attention for link this post and send a trackback. The Jawa Report will issue a Fatwa on you and boom link city.
Woman Fired as Husband is Deployed.
How nice of you to relieve her of that silly job she had now she can worry about her hubby seven days a week 24 hours a day.
Nose On your face Halloween fun and why Harriet Myers wonÂ’t be trick or treating at the Whitehouse.
Eight lives left.
Hellvis, Rock & Roll!!
Sulu is bad gay. All those looks of fear were generated by forcing him to look at Nurse Chapel.
A must read from the La Times.
LA Times:Be warned, senator: If Democrats become the "let's treat Iraq as we treated Vietnam" party, the public will turn away in revulsion, and the Democratic Party will die. It's not in such great shape anyhow.
Halloween hanging.
Reader Love mail: A Turkey from Turkey ItÂ’s been a week or so lets surprise him if his email is valid.
f*ck u mother f*cke5rs sitting on ur fat pusssies thinking ur alll goood u know wat i f*ck u and ur muummma ikilll u jewish f*ccckers
more...
Posted by: Howie at
04:49 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 318 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Thanks a lot for the links Howie. I appreciate it!
Posted by: Buckley F. Williams at October 28, 2005 08:08 PM (O2fD/)
2
Yo, Howie
thats all i got to say
Posted by: Jane at October 28, 2005 08:19 PM (6krEN)
3
Is jihadwatch.org down?
Posted by: lonelysoul at October 28, 2005 08:56 PM (P2mQ8)
4
As to the LA Times article about Iraq being the same as Vietnam: It was refreshing to see a MSM report that correctly tells the public how we “lost” in Vietnam. Everyone seems to have forgotten that we had withdrawn and left the war in the Vietnamese’s hands, then cut them off. We did something somewhat similar in Iraq after the 1991 war. I’m amazed that we have the cooperation from the Iraqis that we now have. Had I been stabbed in the back as they had, I wouldn’t give the US any respect. President Bush has overcome that with his steadfastness in spite of the MSM and Left/Democratic attacks. However, I’m not so sure that a majority the American people would protest an abandonment of the Iraqis. I see the same thing happening as occurred during Vietnam. With the negative reporting from the media, the American people are being made to believe that the sacrifice is not worth the effort. Additionally, the Democrats are now trying to criminalize any action they can of any Bush Administration personnel to defeat the Republicans in the next election; then they can vote to cut the war funding as Senator Leahy and others want.
These people have absolutely no survival instincts as it relates to America and its citizens. But I do. While historians believe only 1/3 of the colonists supported the War of Independence, the Declaration of Independence was still issued and states: “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence . . . .” The Declaration is part of the United States Code. Therefore, some might believe that we the people have the right and obligation to protect ourselves from a government that will not. The 2nd Amendment was justified on that basis. As Jefferson said, “In a nation governed by the people themselves, the possession of arms to defend their nation against usurpers within and without was deemed absolutely necessary.” Something for us and our leaders to think about.
Posted by: AMR at October 28, 2005 10:40 PM (trr9q)
5
Concerning the "Woman Sees Husband Off to Iraq, Gets Fired" story...here's Clark Galloway home number.....616) 891-1616 . I'm sure he'd like to hear from all the supporters out there
Posted by: MOWHAMHEAD at October 29, 2005 04:46 PM (kmZ4I)
6
AMR: I'm with ya on all counts.
Posted by: Oyster at October 30, 2005 06:26 AM (YudAC)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Tony Blair Talks Back to Iran.
After Wednesdays display of stupid by IranÂ’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad followed almost immediately by Islamic JihadÂ’s bombing in Israel. Tony Blair has had enough.
Islamic Jihad is supported by Iran and has headquarters in Damascus Syria. Times of LondonTimes of London: Ending a one-day European Union summit, the Prime Minister called the explosive declaration by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Wednesday a disgrace. Promising discussions with Washington and other allies over how to react, Mr Blair said that he had often been urged not to take action against Iran. But he added: “If they carry on like this the question people will be asking us is — when are you going to do something about Iran? Can you imagine a State like that with an attitude like that having nuclear weapons?”
As Rusty just said Iran is raising the stakes. I think they are betting the US and Britain canÂ’t muster a response. With George W Bush and Tony Blair in the mix along with emerging democracy on two borders and an internal democracy movement I feel itÂ’s a bad bet. Yes itÂ’s time to deal with Iran and Syria. The struggle against intolerant nations will not be easily won. As you can see appeasement does not work. The EU has been trying that and Iran has thumbed their nose at all of us. If we fail to act they will only become more emboldened and dangerous.
Others: Captain Ed and USS Neverdock.
Posted by: Howie at
09:40 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 253 words, total size 2 kb.
1
It really is "send a message" time. Perhaps the US/UK should start by eliminating all the Pali military camps in Bekaa. A few well placed assassinations and explosions in various headquarters could provide a hint of our displeasure.
Posted by: Scott in CA at October 28, 2005 10:39 AM (LGdvw)
2
I saw a quote once, where Iran said they were not intimidated by the threat of a United States Military response; indeed the quote was something to the effect that they had already analyzed our failures in Iraq.
Of course Iran is basing our "military action" purely based on a the scenario of an invasion, and not a carpet bombing back to the stone age, I'm guessing their analysis did not include the "shock and awe" footage, nor did they realize the U.S did not even drop the second, nor first non-nuclear bomb in their inventory, nor deploy EMP based weapons.
It is looking almost certain this will not be settled with diplomacy.
Posted by: dave at October 28, 2005 10:42 AM (CcXvt)
3
This is why I love Tony Blair. That was the perfect statement.
Posted by: caltechgirl at October 28, 2005 10:42 AM (2i1hl)
4
The call by Iran to destroy Israel is, sadly, not new. In 2001, Ali Akbar Rafsanjani, a former president, suggested that the Islamic world annihilate the Jewish state with nuclear weapons, an attack that he claimed would "just produce damages" to the perpetrator. And the elimination of Israel has been a constant theme of rallies organised by the regime. Nevertheless, the speech by President Ahmadinejad in Teheran on Wednesday was shocking. He told a conference entitled "The world without Zionism" that Israel should be "wiped off the map", and expressed no doubt that the latest wave of Palestinian terrorist attacks would soon remove "this disgraceful blot from the face of the Islamic world".
Such remarks by a head of state about a fellow member of the UN are unprecedented. The nearest equivalent is China's refusal to renounce force in seeking reunification with Taiwan, a de facto sovereign entity; in July, one of its generals said his country was prepared to go to nuclear war with America over the island.
Mr Ahmadinejad's speech has been condemned by, among others, the EU, at its Hampton Court summit yesterday, America, Australia, Canada and Russia. Shamefully, there has not been a squeak from the Arab world. Do Egypt, Jordan and Mauritania, all of which have recognised Israel, have no riposte to a president who rants that they will "burn in the fire of the Islamic nation's fury" for having established diplomatic relations with Israel? Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestnian leader, condemned Islamic Jihad's suicide bombing in the Israeli coastal town of Hadera, but has had nothing to say about an existential threat by Iran, one of the movement's sponsors, to a state with which he is trying to reach a final status solution. And there has likewise been silence from governments such as those of Morroco, Qatar and Tunisia, which have sought to strengthen links with Israel following its recent withdrawal from the Gaza Strip.
Shimon Peres, who is a archetypal dove, has suggested that Iran be expelled from the UN. The proposal is pertinent. A member that calls for the destruction of another defies the purposes of the organisation's charter, and should be sanctioned by the Security Council. That body has seemed to court irrelevance over the past few years. It declined to grasp the nettle of Saddam's repeated challenges to its authority. It handed over North Korea's nuclear ambitions to six-party talks hosted by China. It has yet to take proper responsibility for a similar challenge posed by Iran, the issue remaining with the International Atomic Energy Agency, despite Teheran's cavalier attitude to repeated resolutions by the board of governers.
Mr Ahmadinejad's speeches to the UN General Assembly last month and to the Teheran conference on Wednesday have richly confirmed his reputation as a hardline ex-Revolutionary Guard. If the Security Council fails to confront such a rogue head of state, it does not deserve its name.
Posted by: Otocon at October 28, 2005 10:54 AM (PM/BC)
5
Otocon,
One shouldn't be too surprised by the president of Iran's remarks. After all, he was only repeating what most of the surrounding Arab states said when Israel was first established in 1948.
Posted by: Will at October 28, 2005 10:58 AM (PM/BC)
6
Will:
The recently elected President of Iran, has proclaimed his country's nuclear ambitions to be entirely peaceful. Yet, following his mentor, the late Ayatollah Khomeini, he declares that "Israel should be wiped off the map". He has inadvertently made manifest precisely why he needs nuclear power - at least to the Israelis and Jews, if not the bein pensants of "liberal" drawing rooms.
The attempted annihilation of Jewry, as you said, is hardly an original idea, but now, more than ever, it is likely to cost us all a good deal more than the world can afford.
Posted by: Otocon at October 28, 2005 11:05 AM (PM/BC)
7
Did anyone else see where Syria is now calling for dialogue with the US? Typical gutless arabs; they pick a fight then run.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 28, 2005 05:54 PM (0yYS2)
8
Exellent points, Otocon.
Posted by: Oyster at October 28, 2005 08:40 PM (YudAC)
9
Maybe a strongly worded memo will scare 'em to their senses.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 29, 2005 12:16 PM (0yYS2)
10
A message to IRAN if you destroy IREAL we will leave a smoking crater where TERAN is now and screw hanoi jane
Posted by: sandpiper at October 29, 2005 05:41 PM (EPfmS)
11
Tony Blair is finally getting some real balls. Shame about all the muslim vermin that have infested Britain. Next job is to kick them all out. I even heard that one insipid bank has stopped dishing out piggy banks because they may offend muslims...talk about selling out your own traditions to cow down to scum.
Posted by: Jester at October 30, 2005 05:04 PM (QKZX5)
12
Do ignore the Jester, we don't have "muslim vermin" in Britain, we don't even have a comparable level of racism save the Nationalist nutters. And I don't even care if he's jesting, those comments go beyond offending muslims. Grow up about the bank, don't you think they want some muslim customers? The gift is meant to be an incentive, not offensive. But I'll bet you can get a gorgeous piggy bank off ebay to shove up your arse you clown.
Posted by: Blimey at November 25, 2005 08:11 AM (vLzEJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 26, 2005
Iran says, “Israel, Wipe Them Out”
IranÂ’s new President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has dropped the Mr. Nice guy lately.
Yahoo News: Anybody who recognizes Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation's fury, any (Islamic leader) who recognizes the Zionist regime means he is acknowledging the surrender and defeat of the Islamic world," Ahmadinejad said. Ahmadinejad also repeated the words of the founder of Iran's Islamic revolution, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, who called for the destruction of Israel. "As the Imam said, Israel must be wiped off the map," said Ahmadinejad, who came to power in August.
So Mr. Ahmadinejad just how do you propose to do that with all peaceful nuclear technology you are working on that you just transferred to your military? The radical shift in Iran shows how much pressure having two democratic states on their borders added to the domestic cry for freedom is having. They must paint everyone as an enemy of Iran and create a struggle to maintain enough support to stop freedom. Current political problems in the US have left an opening for other nations to pour on pressure. Several have been taking advantage this week including Canada on timber and NAFTA.
Others : Captains Quarters and Jihad Watch.
Posted by: Howie at
11:03 AM
| Comments (25)
| Add Comment
Post contains 211 words, total size 2 kb.
1
It may already be too late to act.
if anyone doesn't think the attention will turn from "little Satan" to "big Satan" as soon as a inter-continental deliverable warhead is assembled, they're fooling themself.
I also saw an article in another person's blog that they may have already tested a EMP weapon.
Posted by: dave at October 26, 2005 11:12 AM (CcXvt)
2
The Israel Firsters are acting like this is a shocking development, and cause for immediate invasion, but considering how Israel has behaved towards its neighbors I find Iran's statements to be merely letting off steam and certainly no worse than the equivilent statements from Israel we have heard over the years.
1. "There is a huge gap between us (Jews) and our enemies not just in ability but in morality, culture, sanctity of life, and conscience. They are our neighbors here, but it seems as if at a distance of a few hundred meters away, there are people who do not belong to our continent, to our world, but actually belong to a different galaxy." Israeli president Moshe Katsav. The Jerusalem Post, May 10, 2001
2. "The Palestinians are like crocodiles, the more you give them meat, they want more".... Ehud Barak, Prime Minister of Israel at the time - August 28, 2000. Reported in the Jerusalem Post August 30, 2000
3. " [The Palestinians are] beasts walking on two legs." Menahim Begin, speech to the Knesset, quoted in Amnon Kapeliouk, "Begin and the Beasts". New Statesman, 25 June 1982.
4. "The Palestinians" would be crushed like grasshoppers ... heads smashed against the boulders and walls." " Isreali Prime Minister (at the time) in a speech to Jewish settlers New York Times April 1, 1988
5. "When we have settled the land, all the Arabs will be able to do about it will be to scurry around like drugged cockroaches in a bottle." Raphael Eitan, Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defence Forces, New York Times, 14 April 1983.
6. "How can we return the occupied territories? There is nobody to return them to." Golda Maier, March 8, 1969.
7. "There was no such thing as Palestinians, they never existed." Golda Maier Israeli Prime Minister June 15, 1969
8. "The thesis that the danger of genocide was hanging over us in June 1967 and that Israel was fighting for its physical existence is only bluff, which was born and developed after the war." Israeli General Matityahu Peled, Ha'aretz, 19 March 1972.
9. David Ben Gurion (the first Israeli Prime Minister): "If I were an Arab leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken their country. It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti - Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault ? They see but one thing: we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?" Quoted by Nahum Goldmann in Le Paraddoxe Juif (The Jewish Paradox), pp121.
10. Ben Gurion also warned in 1948 : "We must do everything to insure they ( the Palestinians) never do return." Assuring his fellow Zionists that Palestinians will never come back to their homes. "The old will die and the young will forget."
11. "We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are resigned to live here as slaves." Chairman Heilbrun of the Committee for the Re-election of General Shlomo Lahat, the mayor of Tel Aviv, October 1983.
12. "Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don't worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it." - Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001, to Shimon Peres, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio.
13. "We declare openly that the Arabs have no right to settle on even one centimeter of Eretz Israel... Force is all they do or ever will understand. We shall use the ultimate force until the Palestinians come crawling to us on all fours." Rafael Eitan, Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defense Forces - Gad Becker, Yediot Ahronot 13 April 1983, New York Times 14 April 1983.
14. "We must do everything to ensure they [the Palestinian refugees] never do return" David Ben-Gurion, in his diary, 18 July 1948, quoted in Michael Bar Zohar's Ben-Gurion: the Armed Prophet, Prentice-Hall, 1967, p. 157.
15. "We should prepare to go over to the offensive. Our aim is to smash Lebanon, Trans-Jordan, and Syria. The weak point is Lebanon, for the Moslem regime is artificial and easy for us to undermine. We shall establish a Christian state there, and then we will smash the Arab Legion, eliminate Trans-Jordan; Syria will fall to us. We then bomb and move on and take Port Said, Alexandria and Sinai." David Ben-Gurion, May 1948, to the General Staff. From Ben-Gurion, A Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte, New York 1978.
16. "We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population." Israel Koenig, "The Koenig Memorandum"
17. "Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you because geography books no longer exist. Not only do the books not exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahlal arose in the place of Mahlul; Kibbutz Gvat in the place of Jibta; Kibbutz Sarid in the place of Huneifis; and Kefar Yehushua in the place of Tal al-Shuman. There is not a single place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population." Moshe Dayan, address to the Technion, Haifa, reported in Haaretz, April 4, 1969.
18. "We walked outside, Ben-Gurion accompanying us. Allon repeated his question, What is to be done with the Palestinian population?' Ben-Gurion waved his hand in a gesture which said 'Drive them out!'" Yitzhak Rabin, leaked censored version of Rabin memoirs, published in the New York Times, 23 October 1979.
19. Rabin's description of the conquest of Lydda, after the completion of Plan Dalet. "We shall reduce the Arab population to a community of woodcutters and waiters" Uri Lubrani, PM Ben-Gurion's special adviser on Arab Affairs, 1960. From "The Arabs in Israel" by Sabri Jiryas.
20. "There are some who believe that the non-Jewish population, even in a high percentage, within our borders will be more effectively under our surveillance; and there are some who believe the contrary, i.e., that it is easier to carry out surveillance over the activities of a neighbor than over those of a tenant.
tend to support the latter view and have an additional argument:...the need to sustain the character of the state which will henceforth be Jewish...with a non-Jewish minority limited to 15 percent. I had already reached this fundamental position as early as 1940 [and] it is entered in my diary." Joseph Weitz, head of the Jewish Agency's Colonization Department. From Israel: an Apartheid State by Uri Davis, p.5.
21. "Everybody has to move, run and grab as many hilltops as they can to enlarge the settlements because everything we take now will stay ours... Everything we don't grab will go to them." Ariel Sharon, Israeli Foreign Minister, addressing a meeting of militants from the extreme right-wing Tsomet Party, Agence France Presse, November 15, 1998.
22. "It is the duty of Israeli leaders to explain to public opinion, clearly and courageously, a certain number of facts that are forgotten with time. The first of these is that there is no Zionism,colonialization or Jewish State without the eviction of the Arabs and the expropriation of their lands." Yoram Bar Porath, Yediot Aahronot, of 14 July 1972.
23. "Spirit the penniless population across the frontier by denying it employment... Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly." Theodore Herzl, founder of the World Zionist Organization, speaking of the Arabs of Palestine,Complete Diaries, June 12, 1895 entry.
24. "One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail." -- Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, Feb. 27, 1994 [Source: N.Y. Times, Feb. 28, 1994, p. 1]
25. "We Jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own." (You Gentiles, by Jewish Author Maurice Samuels, p. 155).
26. "We will have a world government whether you like it or not. The only question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or consent." (Jewish Banker Paul Warburg, February 17, 1950, as he testified before the U.S. Senate).
27. "We will establish ourselves in Palestine whether you like it or not...You can hasten our arrival or you can equally retard it. It is however better for you to help us so as to avoid our constructive powers being turned into a destructive power which will overthrow the world." (Chaim Weizmann, Published in "Judische Rundschau," No. 4, 1920)
Posted by: menenzes' ghost at October 26, 2005 12:01 PM (qBGkb)
3
Speaking of Iran...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20051026/ts_nm/iran_alqaeda_dc
By the way, the lumber dispute has been brewing for years. There's no "taking advantage" going on. Rice just happens to be visiting at the same time.
Posted by: Venom at October 26, 2005 12:34 PM (dbxVM)
4
That's not what a canadian official said on NPR yesterday. Where is that (rummage rummage)
Posted by: Howie at October 26, 2005 12:43 PM (D3+20)
5
Maybe all the antiwar activists should go to iran and urge them to sit around smoke dope and have a love in maybe they will end up with the heads off
Posted by: sandpiper at October 26, 2005 01:40 PM (U+eLg)
6
Hey greg, why don't you head on over to stormfront.org, you'd fit right in there with all the other Joooooo-haters.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 26, 2005 02:19 PM (0yYS2)
7
Greg,
If you want to make a point, ok, but drop all the cut and paste. No one has the time to read all that crap. Just make your point, argue on its merits, and see if anyone agrees or disagrees.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 26, 2005 03:31 PM (rUyw4)
8
Howie, are you sure? The Iranian article you quote said the Iranian president made those comments "Wednesday," as in today. You're saying that the Canadian official made comments on NPR yesterday. So, how could he make comments to "take advantage" of the Iranian presidents comments, when they hadn't even been said yet?
Despite how this might read, I'm not trying to be an asshole. I'm just saying, like before, I highly doubt Canada is using the Iranian president's comments to "take advantage" of anything. Condi was in town, that's why they're bringing it up with her.
Posted by: Venom at October 26, 2005 04:09 PM (dbxVM)
9
Sorry if you misunderstood me. I went over there and rummaged around. Crap. It's quite Ok Venom Good point. However I did hear a Canadian official say they thought they could get a better deal with the US than they could have otherwise with all the other stuff going on. Not taking advantage so to speak but they thought that the time was right to push the US. It got me to thinking about all the distractions with the Plame case Delay so on and so forth. I wonder how many other countries see that and think now is the time we can get away with stuff. Just a thought I had. If you don't agree thats fine. I felt we should consider that maybe we might get all distracted with some issues that while not totally bunk could take away from either the will or the time to effectively deal with bigger issues. I had never thought that another country would consider our internal problems as on opportunity to get a better deal or maybe a good time to get away with stuff. Seemed logical though with a weakened adminstation and a ruling party thats at odds with itelf so I wanted to put that out there for thought. Not so much that one was related to the other but maybe many countries see a crack in our armor due to domsetic squabbles. Like I said it was a new idea to me so I just tossed it in there.
Posted by: Howie at October 26, 2005 04:25 PM (xqi1g)
10
I have an arrangement with the local Mohel. The
Mohel saves the tissue collected during Bris for me. A big steamy bowl of circum-tips cooked menudo style, Yum, Yum! It's my favorite meal!
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 26, 2005 05:31 PM (qBGkb)
11
The best thing about diddling little boys is that once they've been assraped, they grow up to be liberals.
Posted by: greg at October 26, 2005 07:36 PM (0yYS2)
12
Actually, I intended to do a serious comment, but I'm laughing too hard. I got to go get a napkin and clean the computer screen.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 26, 2005 08:13 PM (rUyw4)
Posted by: Howie at October 26, 2005 08:38 PM (D3+20)
14
I wondered where all them damn liberals came from. Thanks for the info, Greg?
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 26, 2005 09:56 PM (rUyw4)
15
Actually I was wrong, the best part about cornholing little boys is that it brings back so many fond childhood memories when my uncle would take me fishing. At least I think we were fishing, he always talked about my worm and his rod.
Posted by: greg at October 26, 2005 11:29 PM (0yYS2)
16
It is dam right true that the Jews stole the land from the palastians with the help of the UN and America. It were first the British that were protecting the Jews. Then came WWII and their support shifted more to the Arabs for the need of oil against the Germans. In 1947 all that changed back. America was one of the first to recognize Israel as the first country without officially having any borders. The Arabs were furious. Then came the six-day war, unfortunately for the Arabs and the rest of the world they lost!
And up to this day they keep the world hostile!
Greedy Jews and stupid Arabs!
Posted by: Dan at October 27, 2005 02:10 AM (9lOIm)
17
Gee, Dan, that was a real gem you came up with there. Does Adolph ring a bell? Just curious.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 27, 2005 10:16 AM (rUyw4)
18
I M: Please don't send Greg to stormfront. Those boys are allready riled up enough.
Posted by: Greyrooster at October 27, 2005 12:25 PM (M7kiy)
19
Hi Jesus,
How is it hanging?
I just lay it out how the Arab world is looking at it. And they have a point.
I am calling the Arabs stupid for not recognizing the Jews by realizing that they have their history in Palestinia to (or maybe not. depends how well you can dig in it's history to make any solid comment if Abraham didn't make an geologically mistake!). And I am calling the Jews Greedy for taking the opportunity to take more land and enslave the Palestinians until they all wiped out. Hey! Why donÂ’t you give a Adolph ring! He probably has some tips for speeding up the process!!!
Dan
Posted by: Dan at October 27, 2005 12:43 PM (9lOIm)
20
Quothe Dan:
"It is dam right true that the Jews stole the land from the palastians with the help of the UN and America."
The Jews bought and paid for land that was deeded, and simply occupied land that wasn't deeded. It is a univeral common law that undeeded land is open to settlement.
"It were first the British that were protecting the Jews."
Wrong again. There was actually a strong anti-Jewish current in British society and government.
"Then came WWII and their support shifted more to the Arabs for the need of oil against the Germans."
The British had been in an alliance with the Arabs since WWI. Remember Lawrence of Arabia?
"In 1947 all that changed back. America was one of the first to recognize Israel as the first country without officially having any borders. The Arabs were furious."
Why were the Arabs furious?
"Then came the six-day war, unfortunately for the Arabs and the rest of the world they lost!"
Then they shouldn't have started it, should they?
"And up to this day they keep the world hostile!"
The sole talent the Arabs possess is to foment trouble.
"Greedy Jews and stupid Arabs!"
If the Jews were so greedy, why didn't they try to take the oil fields when they had the chance? They've only won three wars, defensive war, mind you, against the Arabs, and they could have taken Jordan and parts of Saudi Arabia easily, but they didn't. Go back to Stormfront and continue your fascist circlejerk there.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 27, 2005 03:01 PM (0yYS2)
21
Never heard of Stormfront?
Why is it that every time when you have critique about what is happening in the promised land (ahum!) they make you out for a racist? I have some idea why they do this, it is an easy way to change the subject and putt the other in the defensive. DoesnÂ’t work on me!
But why would you say that, if the Jews are treating the Palestinians as second-rate people.
The fact is that everything that is going on in the Promised Land had an affect on 9/11 – 7/11 – van Gogh – Madrid – Indonesia!
You have to give back the land you stole and that includes Jerusalem!
Anyway, as we speak Iran is playing political hardball by pointing his finger at the problem. Lets see where this is going.
From the land of the windmills
Dan
Posted by: Dan at October 28, 2005 02:55 AM (9lOIm)
22
Dan,
Looks like it will soon be the land of the burqa if most people think the way you do.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 28, 2005 05:18 AM (rUyw4)
23
Ha ha,
Don't worry that will wear off eventually!
Dan
Posted by: Dan at October 28, 2005 08:14 AM (9lOIm)
24
Dan,
I don't mean any disrespect, but the radical Muslims(including OBL) say that the driving force behind their movement is to reintroduce the Caliphate. Whether they think that the Caliphate may be in a better position to destroy Israel is a logical conclusion, but the Islamists have complaints that predate the birth of the nation of Israel.
The Sunnis want the Caliphate to recapture all the land that was lost to Christian Europe(Spain and much of the Balkans and the old Soviet Union) after it had been conquered by Muslim invaders from 670 through 1700.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 28, 2005 04:21 PM (rUyw4)
25
Those radical Muslims are a total different story to me! I know that they dream of the “green land” And their way of an ideal world just horrors me.
I just like to make a point about Israel, in my opinion they pushing the envelope in gaining more territory, and in doing so giving exactly those radicals fuel to rise up even more. It is that Israel is trying to gain more land and nobody is calling them back strongly enough, that means the US and the European union. That is what angers the Muslims! And I can understand that!
Dan
Posted by: Dan at October 28, 2005 08:20 PM (9lOIm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 25, 2005
CanadaÂ’s Engineering Marvel
Canada claims the
worldÂ’s tallest building
The CN Tower at 1815 ft. Soon to be surpassed by the
Burj Dubai under construction. ItÂ’s sturdy too, built like a brick shit house.
Hat Tip : Mark.
Posted by: Howie at
07:16 AM
| Comments (30)
| Add Comment
Post contains 41 words, total size 1 kb.
1
i wouldnt really consider that the worlds tallest "building"....its really just a tower, not an actual office building....lets see how long the Canadians can keep it standing with their oh so liberal ways of letting anyone into Canada
Posted by: THANOS35 at October 25, 2005 09:22 AM (IgomX)
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 25, 2005 09:59 AM (rUyw4)
3
Yeah I bet it won't be long until some 'slamotard takes offence at the Soviet Socialist Republik of Kanukistan's anti-sharia policies, (lame though they may be), and decideds that they aren't dhimmified enough and takes down the CN tower. I wonder if the Kanukistanis will get it then?
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 25, 2005 10:08 AM (0yYS2)
4
Oh, I almost forgot: BOIOIOIOIOIIIIINNNNNGGGGG!!!
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 25, 2005 10:11 AM (0yYS2)
5
probally not, IM...they dont seem very intelligent to me from what i know of them...well at least most....some of them are cool, but they seem to be a small minority...and send Mikey "fatass" Moore and most of the retards in Hollyweird to Canada, well there goes their national IQ, right down the crapper
Posted by: THANOS35 at October 25, 2005 10:28 AM (IgomX)
6
Didn't the U.S. let in all those terrorists back in 2001? Must have been their liberal ways....
Damn that George W.!
*rolls eyes*
Posted by: Venom at October 25, 2005 10:31 AM (dbxVM)
Posted by: Venom at October 25, 2005 10:32 AM (dbxVM)
8
Centcom news says Canada has 1500 troops taking over Anbar province in Afghanistan for us. Just so ya know. select bulletin 26.
http://www.centcom.mil/Operations/Coalition/joint.htm
Posted by: Howie at October 25, 2005 10:35 AM (D3+20)
9
Good point, Howie.
Fuck, if only those Canadians would get onside with the GWOT...oh wait, that only applies to places they aren't.
Posted by: Venom at October 25, 2005 10:39 AM (dbxVM)
10
I have nothing against the Canadian military, they are some damned good guys, it's just the liberals who have taken over the country that I hate. All liberals should be killed for the good of humanity.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 25, 2005 10:44 AM (0yYS2)
11
It's kinda hard when Canada doesn't have a second viable political party to challenge the Liberals. Too much regional voting.
Posted by: Venom at October 25, 2005 10:48 AM (dbxVM)
12
I'm sorry, was there something in the background?
Posted by: Ernie Oporto at October 25, 2005 11:34 AM (/lpvu)
13
my kind of woman....always have been a hooter man.....YEP YEP YEP!!!
Posted by: THANOS35 at October 25, 2005 12:45 PM (IgomX)
14
Man, you could do Shakespeare from that balconey.
Posted by: menenzes' ghost at October 25, 2005 12:45 PM (qBGkb)
15
Some of you guys amaze me with your commentary on the written story. I just couldn't read it. What tower?
Posted by: hondo at October 25, 2005 01:01 PM (ymtSt)
16
Actually, Howie, the first link to Wikipedia doesnt work.
Hilarious post by the way. A double entendre headline, informative, and visually interesting architectural presentation. None too shabby, pauan or padewan or however you spell it.
Posted by: See-Dubya at October 25, 2005 01:13 PM (1CKzL)
17
Thanks See-Dub... Link fixed. like everyone it ws hard to look at the code when..well never mind.
Posted by: Howie at October 25, 2005 01:31 PM (D3+20)
18
I was going to comment, but Mr. Venom scared me away.
Posted by: Vinnie at October 25, 2005 02:13 PM (Kr6/f)
19
There's the reason that tower stands erect.
Posted by: J at October 25, 2005 04:00 PM (/P1rH)
20
If itÂ’s not too much trouble, IÂ’ll take 75 virgins and that one in the picture.
Oh, and Death to America!!
Posted by: M'Balz Es-Hari at October 25, 2005 04:18 PM (3OPZt)
21
Sorry, M'Balz Matahari, you only get 72 raisins. Big joke Allah has played on you to get you to jihad for him. Sorry!
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 25, 2005 05:10 PM (rUyw4)
22
That tower thingie isn't taht tall, I mean ... the girl is taller. /TJ
Posted by: TJ at October 25, 2005 06:31 PM (PL7dL)
23
That tower thingie isn't that tall, I mean ... the girl is taller. /TJ
Posted by: TJ at October 25, 2005 06:31 PM (PL7dL)
24
Technically, the CN Tower is the world's tallest "Free Standing Structure". What that actually means I haven't the foggiest. Whatever it means, it's still not the tallest structure in the world.
Oh, and that's not a tank top. That's a gotdamn retaining wall! The Army Corps of Engineers should study it for future protectitive barriers.
Posted by: Graeme at October 25, 2005 06:46 PM (7+bcT)
25
Oh, what I would do for a peek under that retaining wall or tanktop, or whatever. Just one peek!
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 25, 2005 07:08 PM (rUyw4)
Posted by: Greyrooster at October 26, 2005 01:30 AM (ywZa8)
Posted by: Oyster at October 26, 2005 03:28 PM (fl6E1)
28
71 raisins and her would still be pretty good.
Posted by: M'Balz Es-Hari at October 26, 2005 06:53 PM (3OPZt)
29
Ya know, now that I've gotten around to looking at her face, (trust me, she has a face, look real hard near the top of the photo), she's gonna be a dog in about ten years. What the hell, I'd throw her a bone.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 26, 2005 07:48 PM (0yYS2)
30
Clinton did, bush sr. did, reagan did, carter did. When we opened our boarders we bent over for the world to take a shot. And scum took advantage of it, two towers destroyed and 3,000 dead for the folly.
Posted by: Andre at October 27, 2005 07:22 PM (bQ3vG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 23, 2005
Surfing with Howie.
Because I'm very sensitive to the fact that someone out there wants to saw my head off.
Saddam tied to Al-Qaeda by UN FOXNEWS:
New details of how dark the scandal could prove to be have emerged from the private sale of IHC on June 3, 2005, just as the procurement scandal was about to break. It now appears that while doing business with the U.N., IHC had links both to Saddam HusseinÂ’s old sanctions-busting networks, and to a Liechtenstein-based businessman, Engelbert Schreiber, Jr., known among other things for his ties to a figure designated by the U.N. itself as a financier of Al Qaeda
See: Dr Sanity.
So this explains why Saddam refused to give up old Zaqueery. IÂ’m very sensitive to the fate of those people in Iraq so Saddam should HANG after a fair trial. Also the trial should be blasted loudly day and night and be on Iraqi Nightline every freaking day for two years.
Michael Yon Reports on Iraqi Elections.
Yon:My dispatch entitled “Purple Fingers," covering the Iraqi Constitutional Referendum is finished. An excerpted version will be published in “The Weekly Standard” on Monday, 24 October 2005. The complete dispatch will be published here on the same day. On the evening before “Purple Fingers” is published, Sunday October 23rd, I will conduct a live radio interview from Iraq. Listeners can tune in over the Internet at 9:20 pm EST. For information about the program.
Hat Tip: Instapundit.
As you recall Michael is an embedded reporter in Iraq who reports on his blog. So donÂ’t miss that blog. Mr. Yon always has great photos and great stories. He's not one of those other kind of reporters whom IÂ’ll not link. Plus he seems kind of sensitive.
Religion of Peace targets comic strips wants piglet dead.
But come on he’s such a tiny animal. I’m so sensitive and stuff so those who hate piglet must DIE! Why you ask? I’ll tell you why, because they are not all sensitive like me. Speaking of me being all sensitive and stuff click here to see Howie in action. Select “Completely Understandable Breakdown”. Now if you will excuse me I'm going to go weld some stuff in the rain barefoot and shirtless.
Posted by: Howie at
09:14 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 376 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Brawnyman was fantastic.
Posted by: Oyster at October 23, 2005 11:21 AM (YudAC)
2
Michael Yon will be interviewed live tonight on Pundit Review Radio, 9pm est. All of the info you need to stram the show live, or call in with a question, is contained below.
When: Sunday, October 23, 9pm EST
Where: Streaming Live at BostonÂ’s Talk Station, WRKO.com
Contact: Call us toll free at 877-469-4322
About Pundit Review Radio
Pundit Review Radio is where the old media meets the new. Each week Kevin & Gregg give voice to the work of the most influencial thought leaders in the new media/citizen journalist movement. This unique show brings the best of the blogs to your radio every Sunday evening at 9pm EST on AM680 WRKO, BostonÂ’s Talk Leader.
http://www.punditreview.com
Posted by: Kevin at October 23, 2005 02:12 PM (ynIpo)
3
Every person who aided, abetted, assisted, conspired, or colluded with Saddam in any way related to the OFF scandal should be hanged for crimes against humanity.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 23, 2005 07:56 PM (0yYS2)
4
I'm pissed about the treatment Piglet has been getting from these radical Muslims. I think it is now time for every newspaper and blog to come to the rescue of Piglet.
I'm serious. I like Piglet and I don't know how I might react if some Muslim tried to have my Piglet removed from my office. I might have to start a jihad of my own.
And you know I'm a Southerner, and I love my fatback, dry salt meat, pig feet, ham, pork roast(the other white meat), bacon, and especially Jimmy Dean hot sausage, so any Muslim who tried to starve me to death would face my wrath in the form of a pig jihad.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 23, 2005 09:19 PM (rUyw4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 22, 2005
Burned Bodies, What Really Happened.
One of the big stories this week was the supposed desecration of enemy bodies in Afghanistan. See this interesting report on NPR from the photojournalist who filmed the shots. He says the report on Aussie TV was misrepresenting US soldiers. First
click on listen to see what the man who was there said. Next read the
transcript of the Aussie program to see if they jive. Let me seeÂ….. Uh nope.
NPR:Stephen Dupont, the photojournalist who shot images of the incident, says he believes the Americans were following orders to burn the bodies for hygiene reasons.
The way I see it we gave em all damn day. Also note he says what no one else does. After the Taliban left these men to rot the next day the Americans sent a party to assist with the burial. Also note he says the corpses were not arranged in any fashion they were burned just where they fell. Read the transcript as well. Our boys look pretty good. Note the media twisting and spin the photographer is complaining about in bold. Also the media has twisted the timeline to sensationalize this.
more...
Posted by: Howie at
10:07 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 252 words, total size 2 kb.
1
It wasn't the American's fault. The men spontaneuosly combusted! That part of Afghanistan is like the Bermuda Triangle, weird shit like that happens all the time. I swear on the Fuhrer's honor.
Posted by: menenzes' ghost at October 22, 2005 01:17 PM (qBGkb)
2
Greg, your are such a pathetic loser. Don't you realize you're not even irritating us? At best you are funny, but not in a good way, rather more like watching a drunk fall on ice.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 22, 2005 03:21 PM (0yYS2)
Posted by: menenzes' ghost at October 22, 2005 04:33 PM (qBGkb)
4
greg, i would love to introduce you to a 8 lb mallet....come a little closer so you can get a better look....there ya go, now just keep looking right here.....WHAMMMM!!!!!.....bye greg
Posted by: THANOS35 at October 22, 2005 07:02 PM (IgomX)
5
and besides,after reading the bs from the transcript, mostly about the soldiers playing music to flush out the terrorists, they should play some really loud music that the poor sensitive Muslim terrorists would find really aggravating...i would personally pick Slayer, Anthrax and my all time fave....Suicidial Tendencies....perfect for idiot Muslim terrorists who seem to have death wishes.....tell em, Cyco Miko!!!
Posted by: THANOS35 at October 22, 2005 07:36 PM (IgomX)
6
I am glad they got rid of the stench it must have been horrible. I doubt the Taliban freaks smell that great to begin with.
Posted by: Wild Thing at October 22, 2005 07:37 PM (tj1zH)
7
Uh that stench gets worse before it gets better when yer burnin flesh. I feel for the guys they gotta do it. It has to be done the order is pretty sound give em a day and then take care of it.
Posted by: Howie at October 22, 2005 08:41 PM (D3+20)
8
In the name of the Fuhrer, the Merciless Exalted One, the messenger of God, may God whisper sweetly in his ear, George W. Bush, may he triumph over the Evil Doers, if it be God's will, I send greetings from the front. I can report that our Holy Crusaders are delivering lethal blows to the Subhumans on a daily basis and march forward triumphantly. With God's help, through the messenger of God, may we boil them in a sea of mother's milk and feast on their steaming entrails as we celebrate the Dawn of Empire for the Bushian War Cult, as described by Baber. Our grandchildren will sing songs of our great exploits and will stand on the necks of the Subhumans and rule them as Masters and they obedient and grateful dogs. Long live the Fourth Reich. And, if you can spare it, please send $100,000.
Posted by: menenzes' ghost at October 22, 2005 08:48 PM (qBGkb)
9
Greg,
Read your comments, look in the mirror, and admit you need psychiatric help. That is the first step; yes, I know, little steps, baby steps, but you have to start somewhere. Quickly!
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 22, 2005 10:21 PM (rUyw4)
10
So who can trust the main-stream left-wing new smedia just look at what NEWSWEEKS rotten lie over the koran has done
Posted by: sandpiper at October 23, 2005 01:41 PM (XnXsx)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 21, 2005
October 20, 2005
Bush Meets With Abbas
Today President Bush met with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. After the one hour meeting short statements were made. President Bush called Palestine to confront the armed gangs that constantly cause problems there. IÂ’ve noted that this is a problem. The Palestinian forces have not been wiling or able to face Hamas leaving Israel with the rather nasty job of doing so. If you are going to have a state you canÂ’t depend on your neighbor to do the dirty work for you.
MSNBC:
President Abbas is a man devoted to peace and to his people’s aspiration for a state of their own,” Bush said. “And today, the Palestinian people are closer to realizing their aspirations.” But, Bush said at a news conference after a one-hour meeting in the Oval Office, “the way forward is confronting the threat armed gangs present to creation of a democratic Palestine.”
At the same time the President warned Israel to be also following the roadmap to peace.
Israel should not undertake any activity that contravenes its roadmap obligations... ... Without elaboration, the president said Israel would be “held to account” for any actions that hamper peacemaking or burden the lives of Palestinians.
So it appears the US is being fair and balanced to both sides. Contrary to the perception that Israel wags our dog Mr. Bush seems to have both these dogs by the tail. I would even go so far as to say that if these parties get out of line hit them in the pocket book. Palestine desperately needs the aid we have been giving. How the same thing will work on Israel needs no explanation. The US has invested many years and untold billions of dollars trying to clean up this UN mess. ItÂ’s time we stop holding hands and pussyfooting around and demand not ask for both sides to get it together.
Posted by: Howie at
01:35 PM
| Comments (30)
| Add Comment
Post contains 317 words, total size 2 kb.
1
All aid given to the so-called "Palestinians" only serves the PROVEN purpose of fueling the fire of hate and violence directed toward Israel.We would all be better off in the long term to cease all aid to the "Palestinians" till we can actually have control over where and what it is used for.Corruption within the leadership of the "Palestinians" has already pissed away the billions of $ they have been given.Its time to call a spade a spade and adjust our actions toward a more fruitful outcome.
Posted by: ROGER S HATCHER at October 20, 2005 03:01 PM (7vszL)
2
Yep got to call em on it. Got to pay a bit of lip service to Israel so's it don't look like were picking on Palestine. I think we have been puttng some pressure in Israel due to the whining about us pushing them out of the occupied areas. Heard some the US made us do that stuff, you bet we did. Now we just need to make the other side TKOB or else do it ourselves. Can't really fault Israel for taking out Hamas. But really we need to demand that Palestine do these things. When Israel has to it they turn and use it against them. And yes we may have to use the purse strings here and there. No sense getting nothing for our money. so I think I've been fair here. Hold both sides to it. Then publicly scold whomever fouls up and send that money to LA or Bama.
Posted by: Howie at October 20, 2005 03:17 PM (D3+20)
3
Does anyone in their right mind think Abbas has any control over Hamas? They flaunt their weapons right in front of the Palestinian Police, and have engaged in gun battles with the police.
As a matter of fact, Hamas is the real power in the Gaza strip and they have Abbas for their useful idiot to fool the EU and the US. FOR THE MONEY!
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 20, 2005 04:04 PM (rUyw4)
4
You are right JJ he has no control now. But if they want a state they have to act like one. So he had best get control in a hurry otherwise why spend another dime.
Posted by: Howie at October 20, 2005 04:09 PM (D3+20)
5
Howie: “So it appears the US is being fair and balanced to both sides.”
Howie,
Good topic.
You chose your words carefully, ”it appears”. That’s all it is - an appearance.
Look what we have given to Israel.
U.S. Financial Aid To Israel:
Summary
Benefits to Israel of U.S. Aid?Since 1949 (As of November 1, 1997)?
Foreign Aid Grants and Loans?$74,157,600,000??
Other U.S. Aid (12.2% of Foreign Aid)?$9,047,227,200
??Interest to Israel from Advanced Payments
?$1,650,000,000
??Grand Total?$84,854,827,200
??Total Benefits per Israeli?$14,630
Cost to U.S. Taxpayers of U.S.
Aid to Israel
Grand Total
$84,854,827,200
Interest Costs Borne by U.S.
$49,936,680,000
Total Cost to U.S. Taxpayers
$134,791,507,200
Total Taxpayer Cost per Israeli
$23,240
Not to mention the $2.6 trillion dollars that canÂ’t be accounted for by Dr. (and Rabbi) Dov Zakheim. Any guesses as to where that money went?
“As you know, the Department of Defense really is not in charge of its civilian workforce, in a certain sense. It's the OPM, or Office of Personnel management, I guess. There are all kinds of long- standing rules and regulations about what you can do and what you can't do. I know Dr. Zakheim's been trying to hire CPAs because the financial systems of the department are so snarled up that we can't account for some $2.6 trillion in transactions that exist, if that's believable. And yet we're told that we can't hire CPAs to help untangle it in many respects.”
HYPERLINK "http://www.dod.gov/speeches/2001/s20010716-secdef2.html" http://www.dod.gov/speeches/2001/s20010716-secdef2.html
The Pentagon is crawling with Israeli Firsters like Zakheim. So much so, that if we ever attempted to nuke Israel, the missiles would not launch, or if they did, they would make a U-turn and hit American soil.
Israel gets $billions per year from us, by contrast, the last I heard, we were giving the Palestinians about $50 million per year. Israel destroys more than $50 million in Palestinian property each year, so the Palis arenÂ’t even treading water. One of IsraelÂ’s major targets has been the Pali police force, which has been decimated. And Israel wonders why the Palis canÂ’t police effectively.
Abbas is no more responsible for the actions of Hamas, than the U.S. puppets in Iraq are responsible for the actions of the insurgents.
The Road Map has Israel giving the Palis the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. As soon as the Israelis abandoned Gaza they began building more settlements in the West Bank, which is contrary to the Road Map.
Good luck holding IsraelÂ’s feet to the fire. You canÂ’t out Jew, a Jew and you damn sure canÂ’t out Jew, Israel.
Posted by: menenzes' ghost at October 20, 2005 07:35 PM (qBGkb)
6
howie, perhaps you should look into exactly what the US receives for much of the money that is 'guaranteed loans' to Israel. It might change your mind about some of the rather unfair things you've written here about Israel.
Posted by: Bubbe at October 20, 2005 07:44 PM (cbAi4)
7
"Gauranteed loans to Israel" my ass. Gauranteed by the American Taxpayers!
Posted by: menenzes' ghost at October 20, 2005 07:55 PM (qBGkb)
8
"rather unfair things you've written here about Israel."
Howie didn't say anything unfair about Israel. But I will.
Fuck those bastards. We ought to just invade Israel and take care of this cancer that has metastasized into a GWOT once in for all.
First we've got to purge all those fucking Israeli Firsters and End Times wackos from the DOD so they won't fuck us up from within.
alright Bubbe Schwartsteingoldenstein?
Posted by: menenzes' ghost at October 20, 2005 08:04 PM (qBGkb)
9
Greg,
You are absolutely frickin crazy! Don't ever call anybody a fascist or Hitler again!
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 20, 2005 08:52 PM (rUyw4)
10
JJ,
Pull your head out of your ass.
Posted by: menenzes' ghost at October 20, 2005 09:06 PM (qBGkb)
11
Oh, Greg, by the way, how are you feeling about Jamie Gorelick right about now? It seems certain people in the Clinton Administration knew about Atta and the NYC terrorist cell, but prevented the news from reaching the FBI. Louis Freeh, the former FBI director said he would have acted on this information had it reached him, and the destruction of NYC and the GWOT would never have happened.
This should make you very happy, because I have seen you say many times that their was a 9/11 conspiracy, and I didn't believe you, but now I will have to say you were right in this case. Congratulations, Greg!
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 20, 2005 09:25 PM (rUyw4)
12
You're probably not even aware that AIPAC is currently being investigated in the biggest espionage case since John Pollard gave our nuclear secrets to Israel who promptly sold them to the Soviet Union in exchange for lax emigration rules for Russian Jews wanting to move to Israel. We're still paying for that one. It's embedded in that dinasour of a National Debt that we've all been yoked to.
Here's the pussy, Israeli, version of the story:
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/631009.html
And here is an honest to God analysis by Justin Raimondo, a conservative American.
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=7454
Both sides of the story. Take your pick.
Posted by: menenzes' ghost at October 20, 2005 09:34 PM (qBGkb)
13
Amen JJ and congratulations on your baby step.
Members of both parties are involved in that conspiracy and in the OK City bombing and the 1st WTC bombing, which were Clinton's. When you arruve at that conclusion, we can have an honest conversation.
Posted by: menenzes' ghost at October 20, 2005 09:40 PM (qBGkb)
14
arrive,
Damn, Damn, Damn.
Posted by: menenzes' ghost at October 20, 2005 09:41 PM (qBGkb)
15
After the first Gulf War, Bush (41) repatriated a couple of thousand Proletarian Gaurds to OK City. They had apparently been apart of a breakaway group that essentially surrendered before the war even started.
During the Clinton administration the bombing occured and a John Doe #2 was spotted who was reported to of middle eastern decent. There are two videos that Attorney David Schippers is after, either of which would corroborate this (Schippers, you'll recall, prosecuted Clinton during the impeachment hearings). He has been representing an OK City newswoman that has evidence that a group of OK City Iraqi's were involved since 1995.
Schippers was interviewed by Alex Jones. Jones does attempt to steer him in the interview, but Schippers is no lightweight. You don't have to read Alex's comments, but do read what Schippers has to say. Schippers has gone nowhere in the MSM. The OK City newswoman's station originally ran with the story, then abruptly fired the woman and cleaned their website of any reference to the story.
http://www.infowars.com/transcript_schippers.html
Posted by: menenzes' ghost at October 20, 2005 10:02 PM (qBGkb)
16
was he the smoking gun, on the grassy knoll greg?
Posted by: dave at October 20, 2005 11:07 PM (CcXvt)
17
Greg, we're ready to believe you.
Posted by: Ghostbusters at October 20, 2005 11:14 PM (6mUkl)
18
okay, this may be OT, but i recently read some editorials in a New York Post paper, it concerned the Israelie pullout in Gaza and sadly enough, but not too surprising to me as most of the writers are from NYC, they all blamed the situation on Israel...the Palisimians are innocent according to these idiots{probally all related to Greg....oh,a big Heil Hitler to you Fuhrer Greg, you lowly cellar dwelling C.H.U.D.}...i guess it ties in with the topic here as we see how Fuhrer Greg here tries to blame everything from Aids to the Fall of Rome on the Jews somehow....it must be a sad and lonely world down there in the sewers, eh Mein Fuhrer Greg???
Posted by: THANOS35 at October 20, 2005 11:16 PM (IgomX)
19
Greg has come undone.
Dude you have lost it.
Posted by: Brad at October 20, 2005 11:19 PM (6mUkl)
20
So let me ask you this, Casper the Ghost: What happened to all the money every other country, in Europe and elsewhere, gave to the Palestinians? Huh? So their chances of success in pulling themselves out of the stone age is based solely on how much money is given to them by the US? Get on Google and see how many countries have given aid to the Palestinians over the last twenty years and how many gave to the Israelis.
You're the one with your head up your ass. Nice how you phrased your statement based on US aid and never mention all the money squandered, stolen and otherwise misspent by the Palestinians that was given them by so many other countries. Oh and Suha! Don't forget her 60 million or so annual payments.
And before you start your useless twaddle again, let me tell you that no matter what you say, you have put forth too many whacked out conspiracies here for anyone to take you seriously. And your hate speech is abhorrent. Yes, I believe the Palestinian people need a state, they need an identity, but as long as the Hamas psychopaths are running the show, it's not going to happen. You need a serious dose of reality to understand that.
Your loyalties always seem to lie with the tyrants and psychos. While you gleefully berate the US for taking out Saddam, a murderous tyrant, you think it's a good idea to take out Israel and leave another tyrannical group in power. After your silly little,
"Fuck those bastards," outburst I have no desire to listen to another word you say. So cram it.
Posted by: Oyster at October 21, 2005 05:17 AM (YudAC)
21
Oh shuck Off, Oyster and the rest of you brain washed semitophiles.
You're too damn lazy to listen to Schippers, who has impeccable credentials.
Posted by: menenzes' ghost at October 21, 2005 08:05 AM (qBGkb)
22
Easy greg sorry I temped you with Israel. I don't feel I said anything unfair about Isreal. They are a state and should be treated like any other state. I don't hate em. Nothing of the sort but if you are going to mediate you have to take a balanced approach. There is already a perception that the US is Israels lap dog. I would much rather they be our lap dog. You can't let them by with stuff just because they are who they are. You got to be objective. Imagine they are russia or france or any other state and act in that manner. I'm not saying you have to be mean to em. On the other hand you have to keep the pressure on palestine. If we are unwilling to look objetively at the deal and be fair and even which means we might have to smack a hand or two now and then we should get out and let the UN try. Oh wait they made this mess by forcing the brits out before the time had come. Now of course greg hates em and can't resist going offf on em. I just want to see the shit fixed. Been going on 50 years as a waste of time and money if we are the worlds last remaining superpower we should fisk this. Not against the wall good idea worked in Germany. Not against Israel killing terrorists. My main point is that Palestine needs to TKOB and Isreal needs to be careful. Our President said so and I know lots of people don't quite agree with him lately but if he is working on this I'll support it. So if you want to say someone is being unfair to Isreal say it's Bush. I'm just going along with his game plan which is to put pressure on both sides.
Greg one post was too long. also do a percent if you are above 20 % on a thread get the idea. I'm watching. I knew you would be temped be good. and try and be somewhat civil.
Posted by: Howie at October 21, 2005 08:52 AM (D3+20)
23
What you don't understand, Greg, is there's a huge leap between saying, "The government knew about 9/11 before it happened," and saying, "The DIA or some in the Pentagon knew that Atta and possibly three others were in the country and up to something and if the proper attention were paid, something like 9/11 could have been avoided." And your mantra for some time now has been the former.
We all already learned, shortly after the fact, that there was a glut of information on many issues (not just 9/11) that hadn't been passed on from one department to another and that there was a possibility such information could have prevented 9/11, but to say all the dots had been connected beforehand and someone knew they would specifically fly planes into buildings and that there was a mass conspiracy to let it occur is a stretch.
That lack of cooperation between departments was, and still is, being addressed. That is something that has to be considered as well when delving into such issues. It's disingenuous and irresponsible to take such a complicated issue and shorten it to sound like something it simply isn't.
I apologize for being a twit, but you are so infuriating. You have a tendency to just leap off the conspiracy cliff without applying some common sense to the way you just repeat what you hear. Use your own head to glean fact from fiction. It's just like back in high school and hearing rumors about other kids and repeating it verbatim. As they say, there's always a little truth to rumor, but we must use our own powers of reasoning to understand how much of anything is really true.
Posted by: Oyster at October 21, 2005 09:28 AM (fl6E1)
24
I don't hate Jews, I hate Israel and the Israeli/U.S. relationship. I have plenty of Jewish friends, two of which are life-long friends.
Israel's Ziocons are the new fascist Nazis. They learned well from their German masters.
Posted by: menenzes' ghost at October 21, 2005 12:14 PM (qBGkb)
25
Hey how come the ghost guy can post as many numbers as he did ? I thought no one liked math ? what i would have liked to see is how much total aid per israeli verses per palestinian. MSM has always been pro israeli.
Posted by: john Ryan at October 21, 2005 12:26 PM (ads7K)
26
John R,
There about 5 million Palestinians in Israel, Gaza and the West Bank. We have been giving them $50,000,000 per year. That's $10 per Pali per year. Compare that to the $4 billion per year (conservative figure) that we give to Israel. That's about $1000.00 per Israeli Jew per year.
You're right about thhe MSM being pro-Israel. The NYT reports the deaths of Israeli children 7 times more than it reports the death of Palistinian children. Even though, 10 times as many Pali kids are killed per year than Isreali kids.
The bias is therfore quantifiable. It is a 70-fold bias.
Posted by: menenzes' ghost at October 21, 2005 12:52 PM (qBGkb)
27
Mr Ghost, Should they (Palestine) not also have to show thye do a good job with the money as well. I see your point but just giving them 4 bil all at once makes me a bit nervous. Can't let it backflow to Hamas or other terrorists. Still proably tough for Palestine to get after em without some help. My worrie is that the PA won't get the job done. Some idiot will blow himself up. Israel will over react knowing full well that's exactly what the terrorists want then boom right back where we started
Posted by: Howie at October 21, 2005 10:17 PM (D3+20)
28
Nope not going to edit that dude.
Posted by: Howie at October 21, 2005 10:19 PM (D3+20)
29
Howie,
There are those on both sides who don't want any compromise. Witness the assassination of Rabin. We should attempt to marginalize these elements.
Ironically, Hamas, which is loosely related to the Muslim Brotherhood, is a creation of Israel's meant to factionalize the PLO. Now the hens are coming home to roost (Doesn't that always happen?)
"Israel and Hamas may currently be locked in deadly combat, but, according to several current and former U.S. intelligence officials, beginning in the late 1970s, Tel Aviv gave direct and indirect financial aid to Hamas over a period of years.
Israel "aided Hamas directly -- the Israelis wanted to use it as a counterbalance to the PLO (Palestinian Liberation Organization)," said Tony Cordesman, Middle East analyst for the Center for Strategic Studies."
GO HORNS, GO STROS!
Posted by: menenzes' ghost at October 22, 2005 12:16 AM (qBGkb)
30
Ghost: The islamofacists of the muslim world are my enemy. The Jews are their enemy. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. For now.
Posted by: BigAl at October 23, 2005 06:03 PM (6krEN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 18, 2005
Vets Day Cancelled at Berkeley.
Ok if you are so far left that
Berkeley don't want you to speak. Well I guess that says it all.
SunHerald:
WALNUT CREEK, Calif. - (KRT) - Berkeley's Veterans Day ceremony, scheduled for Nov. 11, was abruptly canceled on Monday because the volunteer organizing committee split over the political content. At issue was a proposal by the chairman, singer/songwriter Country Joe McDonald, to have Bill Mitchell, a co-founder of Cindy Sheehan's organization, Gold Star Families for Peace, as the keynote speaker.
Others : California Conservative and Michelle Malkin.
Oh so this is Why CindyÂ’s in Berkeley. Also it looks like President Bush will have more than one Turkey this Thanksgiving.
Speaking of CC, What you really need to know to understand the Iraqi Elections and why the MSM doesnÂ’t tell you.
Related kinda Michael Yon is back in Iraq.
Terror hoax perp caught in Mexico.
CNN:
Mexican authorities arrested Jose Ernesto Beltran Quinonez, 34, early Saturday in Mexicali, a border city about 120 miles east of San Diego, the FBI said. A three-count indictment charges Beltran with perpetrating a terrorist hoax and making false statements about an alleged plot to smuggle a nuclear warhead into the United States from Mexico
The latest on the OK University bombing MSM VS blogs with Michelle and Mark Tapscott.
Jawa Report posts From Rusty on the subject here.
And that's the way it is or was or what I had time for.
Posted by: Howie at
07:57 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 247 words, total size 2 kb.
1
More from the peoples republic of berkeley americans own ho chi min city just what a disgracful place and its in the vertial same area as honoi on the bay
Posted by: sandpiper at October 18, 2005 08:33 PM (swaoX)
2
Country Joe? Is that smug, faux-populist, hippie dumba$$ still taking up space? I'd have thought that pot-cured ham would have perished in a half-way house trying to light a doobie over a gas stove long ago.
Posted by: D. Carter at October 18, 2005 08:41 PM (xT77+)
3
You know what's so funny here. The liberals actually think they are supporting the troops when they go out and get a bunch of crazies to call our troops baby killers and such. It's hilarious that they are so stupid and full of themselves. Yep, you can bet the troops feel the love they get from places like Berkeley!
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 18, 2005 08:50 PM (rUyw4)
4
The amazing thing about this Berkley thing is that a collection of nit-wits see Veterans Day (a non-partisan event to say the least) as an opportunity to USE (hi-jack, pimp, whore, whatever etc.) for their own purposes without batting an eye. Inappropriate is an understatement - they are oblivious to the fact that they are telling everyone else (like er - the veterans) to bend over or get lost.
Berkley is an extremely liberal town - for them to cancel indicates that a majority of the lib/left even recognized how stupid this left stunt was and bailed out to prevent personal embarrassment.
Posted by: hondo at October 18, 2005 11:18 PM (bayez)
5
I'm glad they dumped the idea, because as a veteran, I don't want any goddamn stupid filthy hippies to even breathe on Veteran's Day, much less have an event. God I hate liberals. They should all be puirged for the good of society. Maybe we could grind them up and ship them to Africa to feed the starving people there, solving two problems at once.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 19, 2005 06:16 AM (0yYS2)
6
I've never been a link whore,
BUT I'm pissed and it was too much to say here....
Posted by: Oyster at October 19, 2005 06:37 AM (YudAC)
7
The fact that Berzerkeley even allowed Joe on the committee is a clue to their seriously deranged messed-up-ness. Joe is a second generation Communist agitator, his radical-red parents named him after Joseph Stalin - a fact he proudly declared in a newspaper article years ago.
Posted by: -keith in mtn. view at October 19, 2005 10:35 AM (T85lV)
8
Mr. and Mrs. McDonald wanted to name their son after a man of Peace and an advocate of free speech. Joseph StalinÂ….what a great choice.
Not so peaceful, not so free with the speech, but the health care was great!
Posted by: Brad at October 19, 2005 11:25 AM (3OPZt)
9
tHEY CAN COME TO etna calfornia WERE HOLDING A VETERANS DAY PARADE and were not anything like the PEOPLES REBUBLIC OF BERKLEY
Posted by: sandpiper at October 19, 2005 08:48 PM (UwJcR)
10
Country Joe served a full 3 year hitch in
the regular Navy in Japan in 1959-1962.
He is an honorably discharged Petty Officer.
For years he has worked for Veterans rights.
He is a family man and father of 5.
His parents were communists he is not.
Posted by: Ron at October 20, 2005 12:15 PM (7k5kk)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 16, 2005
Umpires Strike Back.
LetÂ’s see here aside from the evil
McChimpy Hellibacon conspiracy with the JOOS to buy the umpires and catapult Houston to the Word Series.
Yes itÂ’s them. Or it could be like
my team sucks or the score at the
end of the game or some shit like that. The umpires sucked equally hard for both teamsÂ… Â…or did they?
La Russa yer outta here!!!!!! Hey thatÂ’s a good idea.
What else is going on hmmm...???
TerroristÂ’s have recruited about 70 from UK in the last year via online.
Jihad Watch & The Times of London.
Watch for the Transcript of the FNS DICK Durbin interview that is if they ever get round to posting it. DICK will explain his partyÂ’s plan to win the war which is.......AHHHHH.err... to shoot holes in someone elseÂ’s plan. Sounds like a winner there DICK. While you were thinking that up guess we have been doing? Also if they ever post it see why Condi Rice is the smartest person on DC.
Paraphrased “No I would never want to run for President”.
I canÂ’t freakin quote it till you post it if you have it must be in tiny little print Chris you puffed toad you. Actually if you think about it Durbin looks more like a toad. It was like two puffed toads in a debate each puffing a little bigger. Wallace won.
Updated: OK transcript up. And here too.
And now back to Baseball....
Posted by: Howie at
08:53 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 248 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 16, 2005 09:48 PM (rUyw4)
Posted by: Brad at October 16, 2005 10:10 PM (6mUkl)
3
Sorry, Brad, but you could move to Texas. We'd love to have you down here, and I bet your son could play football. Cross country isn't quite as big, you know, with the girls as high school football. That's probably the main reason my son plays. He ain't going pro, that's for sure.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 17, 2005 08:07 AM (rUyw4)
4
Joe, my son is not going pro either. For now, I am holding on to the dream of him getting a Catholic high school Baseball or cross-country scholarship. I stay awake at night dreaming of spending that $850 per month tuition on myself, greedy bastard that I am.
We are rooting for the Astros in my house. My son likes them for the killer bees and that crazy hump in centerfield of Minute Maid Park.
Posted by: Brad at October 17, 2005 09:36 AM (6mUkl)
5
Baseball blows monkey choade. If it were any slower it'd be agriculture. And what's up with baseball players' butts? They all have big butts. If I want to see a mind-numbing slow ballgame and big butts, I'll watch girls' fast pitch softball, which also has considerably less scratching and spitting.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 17, 2005 03:35 PM (0yYS2)
6
IM,
My #2 son calls baseball organized boredom, and he plays football and basketball, so you and he would get along great. My #1 son played football and baseball in high school, so I had to maintain an interest in baseball. Besides, even if baseball is boring on tv, it's great fun going to the actual games. Can't tell you why, but it's fun.
We have an out of town junior varsity football game tonight, so I won't be commenting until tomorrow. Greg, don't dis me while I'm away.
Brad,
That's not greed. You're sure to need a new rifle or shotgun, the 4-wheeler needs updating, the golf clubs are obsolete, and there are lots more very important things you can think of, I'm sure.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 17, 2005 04:04 PM (rUyw4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 13, 2005
Al-Zawahiri Disclaims Letter
Al-Zawahiri has posted a statement saying
this is a fabrication of the Black House.
Right Doc. So we would fabricate the best advice anyone could give Zaqueery. Nice try, of course you must disclaim it to raise doubt. Al-Qaeda is losing and you know it. Muslim public opinion is against you as they are seeing you for what you are, murderers. You bring nothing but suffering on those you say you fight for.
CNN:
Responding to al Qaeda in Iraq's denial, a spokesman for the U.S. director of national intelligence, John Negroponte, said top officials in the U.S. government are confident the letter is real. The spokesman said the letter was "verified by multiple sources over an extended period of time."
So Doc. Are you saying that Shia Slaughter in Iraq is just fine and dandy or what? That the murder of innocents and beheadings are exactly what Al-Qaeda should be doing? Or is the letter real? One or the other Doc.
Aso here on FOXNEWS
Also See Chad Evans' take at In the Bullpen.
Posted by: Howie at
05:01 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 180 words, total size 1 kb.
1
sounds like Zawahiri learned all about deniable culpability from DailyKOS.
Seeing as it looks like his advice has been ignored, and in theory he's been made to look irrelevant by the "young dog" I'd be denying that I sent it too.
Posted by: dave at October 13, 2005 05:28 PM (CcXvt)
2
It must suck to use snailmail these days, and you just know they hate not being able to swap goat prØn like in the good old days when they didn't have to live in caves and had all the boys they cared to bugger.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 13, 2005 09:43 PM (0yYS2)
3
Looks like the Moslems originally believed that the reports of the atrocities committed in the name of Allah were either lies or exaggerations.
I think they are learning otherwise through improved communications over the internet with corelegionists, as well as the personal experience of having to put up with the Taliban types.
Posted by: Phillep at October 13, 2005 10:37 PM (AYVCN)
4
Nearly every comment on Kos either denies the letter is real or has turned it around to poke fun (and be outright snide) toward the US. Why don't they all just take a one way trip east? Oh, because they like their freedom? That nasty little fact keeps popping up, dammit. Nevermind that the buggers are selfish with the concept of freedom. It's not good enough for others. I'll stop here before I start shouting epithets.
Posted by: Oyster at October 14, 2005 07:04 AM (YudAC)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 12, 2005
The USS Cole Fifth Anniversary
Today is five years since the Cole was bombed by Al-Qaeda while refueling at the port of Aden in Yemen.
Michelle Malkin Asks that we all note this on our blogs. Below find a quote form some of Michelle's work from 2001.
Malkin:
BEFORE 9-11, there was 10-12. On this dark day, one year ago, a bomb ripped through the U.S.S. Cole - and tore apart the lives of 17 American families who lost loved ones in the terrorist attack...
Posted by: Howie at
01:37 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 89 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I would go one giant step farther than Michelle. Muslims have hated all others forever. They have been killing Hindus, Buddhists, Baptists, Jews... for over 1,000 years.
Because in the past we had so few here and were so far away from them they did not seem a problem to us.
That notion should have left our minds 30 years ago. The year after Jimmy Carter stabed the Shaw in the back the Muslims took over our embassy in the Shaw's country. They only let the Americans free after Ronnie came in to office. They knew full well that Ronnie would destroy a lot of property and kill a lot of Muslims to get them out or bring justice for their deaths.
Thanks to the America hating MSM/DNC we pretended the problem did not exist. It has existed for over 1,000 years; and it is a very real world wid problem today. Ask a Limmie.
Posted by: Rod Stanton at October 12, 2005 03:47 PM (tplWd)
2
Right on the money Rod. Islam is hate, and it must be crushed.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 13, 2005 07:21 AM (0yYS2)
3
I just want to say that even thought my cousin Tim isnt here with us today, he will always be with us in our hearts. I love him so much and im very proud of him. I hope someday i will be up there in that great place he calls home now! We love and MISS you alot TIMOTHY!!**
Posted by: Samantha Gauna at October 18, 2005 01:47 PM (gIaCs)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 11, 2005
Full Traslation of Ayman al-Zawahri's Letter to Zaqueery
The US had released a full transcript of a letter to Al-Qaida in Iraq. The letter
intercepted last week spells out Al-Qaida's plans. They are counting on the US backing out of Iraq and then using Iraq as a base to spread westward to Syria and Lebanon and then to attack Israel.
Yahoo News:
"Things may develop faster than we imagine," Ayman al-Zawahri wrote in a letter to his top deputy in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. "The aftermath of the collapse of American power in Vietnam — and how they ran and left their agents — is noteworthy. ... We must be ready starting now."
Al-Zawahiri also worries that Zaqueery is screwing things up. My opinion is that Zaqueery has indeed hijacked the resistance and Bin Laden and Al-Zawahiri are no longer in control. The Al-Qaeda leadership realize they have a madman in Iraq and are desparate to control him. The recent beheading of hostages I feel is a thumb in the eye to the old leadership of Al-Qaeda and Zaqueery asserting his control.
We don't want to repeat the mistake of the Taliban, who restricted participation in governance to the students and the people of Qandahar alone. They did not have any representation for the Afghan people in their ruling regime, so the result was that the Afghan people disengaged themselves from them. Even devout ones took the stance of the spectator and, when the invasion came, the amirate collapsed in days, because the people were either passive or hostile.
Read the whole transcript here.
Posted by: Howie at
10:13 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 270 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Kinda sounds like the DLC vs Kos kids fight...
Posted by: MKL at October 12, 2005 01:07 AM (yJDqu)
2
You know sometimes you wish you had thought of something someone else posted. Well, this is one of those times, dammit, MKL, I should have thought of that, and I would have, too, if you weren't so dang quick witted.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 12, 2005 10:15 AM (rUyw4)
3
I had to dig to find it, but here is the DailyKosÂ’s view of the letter: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/10/12/01659/989
Summary: Bush/Rove, Inc. (et al) made it up to go along with his speech last week. They really tear it apart piece by piece. I donÂ’t know which is scarier, the letter itself or their take on it.
Now if youÂ’ll excuse me, I need to go take a shower to wash off all the filth from digging up that link.
Posted by: JohnMc at October 12, 2005 12:40 PM (y+I+a)
4
John Yeah I had a post worked up last week with a Kos links still may talk about it. But the jist was how several Dems were trying to talk some sense into the democratic party. Including Carville. Now Carville is a nut but if yer a Jawa ya gott a love the ornery bastard and he was right on target as usuall. Kos had reaction and I looked it over. It was basically lalalalalalalaal not gonna listen and then he suggested what the Dems needed was to dig up some old tricks from Lincoln's 1860 campaign. Yes thats right steal from a Republican candidate from 145 years ago and that would fix the Dems problems. Carville should go over there and slap him silly. Oh forgot he is already silly. Carville needs to got over there and slap some sense into him. Really these guys were trying to help and bring some common sense back the Dems but the moonbats wanted no part of it. They had better open up to what their own is telling them.
Posted by: Howie at October 12, 2005 02:31 PM (D3+20)
5
The more I learn about the thinking of these people the more I realize there is a Pol Pot moment somewhere around the corner if they get their way a bit.
Posted by: hondo at October 12, 2005 04:23 PM (/jH/1)
6
Ive just read the English translation, and it just doesn't
sit right. And no, I'm not a Kosian, quite far from it. If
we accept this letter was from July, it seems to have had
no effect as the mosque attacks on Shia have continued.
al-Zawahiri pretty clearly says stop that.
Many of the statements give me pause, but for each you can
easily make a case they are not fabricated. However, this
line near the end did make me scratch my head:
9-My greetings to all the loved ones and please give me news of Karem and the rest of the folks I know, and especially:
By God, if by chance you're going to Fallujah, send greetings to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.
Wasn't the letter purported to be meant for al-Zarqawi? He already gave extensive greeting and blessing at the start,
why this line near the end?
Kos I assume (its too late to read their rantings) are
implying a conspiracy of somekind with Bush. But I'm
wondering, if this is indeed fabricated, is it really
intended as disinformation for jihadists not in immediate
contact with Zarqawi or Zawahiri? In effect getting
word out that the big guys want you to ease up on the
attacks on Shia and beheadings and the like, while containing just enough material for the 'true believers' to accept it?
Posted by: mike at October 12, 2005 09:54 PM (FTk5R)
7
That rings true, if you believe al-Zarqawi is some subservient puppet of the Al-Qaeda high ups, that might have rang true two years ago, but now he has his own followings, and has almost made them irrelevant.
I think you'll find he'll be pushing his own agenda, and not Al Qaeda's, which includes the head cutting, Mosque bombing agenda which he has used to relative success.
The Hundred Thousand dollars almost sounds like a loyalty test, will he pay his dues?
Posted by: dave at October 13, 2005 12:45 AM (CcXvt)
8
Nice conspiracy theories Mike and Dave. Hey, did you hear that the JOOOOOOOOS were behind 9/11?
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 13, 2005 07:25 AM (0yYS2)
9
mine wasn't a conspiracy theory IMP, I believe the letter is legit, but I believe the motives are different.
I think it's likely that Al-Zarqawi will not follow directions from the inner circle of Al Qaeda, it was politically convenient to align his group with Al Qaeda when he was an unknown, one legged Johnny Jihad that needed funding and recognition to continue his campaign. I think Al-Zarqawi thinks he can surpass Bin Laden / Al Zawahiri, he may even challenge them for leadership of Al Qaeda.
Bin Laden was lionized by his "record" in the Afghanistan - Russia campaign, so far Al-Zarqawi has become as wanted as Bin Laden, he has also shown to be far more successful in the "Jihad" than Bin Laden and the Al Qaeda leadership.
Al Zawahiri has remained hidden, while Zaqawi has waged a one-man campaign against the United States, Bin Laden hasn't been heard from since November(?) 2004, who better to challenge for the leadership of Al Qaeda? now I think Zawahiri is wondering if he still has "control" over those who claim to be acting under him? If this letter was sent two months ago, and he hasn't followed it, has he sent the money? you see where I'm going?
Mike: the fact is these letters are passed between different fractions, using low tech couriers it's likely it passed through numerous elements before reaching it's target.
Posted by: dave at October 13, 2005 09:54 AM (CcXvt)
10
Of course he doesn't want to take orders. Terrorists are nothing more than criminal gangsters who will murder anyone who gets in their way. In a confederacy of rats, the only thing that matters is being the biggest rat.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 13, 2005 11:32 AM (0yYS2)
11
ummmm. Why all the talk about Kos ? Is he really important or significant ? What I think we should be doing is tying to analyze the letter. Are they really that confident of success ? If so we should be taking a second look at our own assesment of their morale. And how can we improve our own national morale: by being brutally honest about the situation (giving aid and comfort to the enemy) or delusionally optimistic (tactics of desperation,last throes of the insurgents etc). Myself I want to be told an accurate assesment, no sugar coating please, and thank you.
Posted by: john Ryan at October 13, 2005 12:55 PM (ads7K)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 10, 2005
Jesus Under Attack
See
California Conservative for the details. I've been so busy I have several things I wanted to blog but the time just is not there. So Sorry
CC better late than never.
"We need to attack Jesus..." - atheist Philip Paulson,
who filed a lawsuit challenging the presence of the cross
on city land in 1989.
Posted by: Howie at
10:08 AM
| Comments (23)
| Add Comment
Post contains 61 words, total size 1 kb.
1
>>>"The city has attempted twice to sell the property to the Mount Soledad Association,
but federal courts have overturned the sales because they said the transactions favored a buyer who would preserve the cross."
Wow. Now the activist courts are in the business of discerning people's hearts and motives. That's out of control.
Posted by: Carlos at October 10, 2005 11:35 AM (8e/V4)
2
As serious an issue as this may be, I couldn't help thinking, "Go ahead, Phil, attack Jesus, I think he can take you."
Posted by: Brian B at October 10, 2005 11:39 AM (rGfpg)
3
yep not a laughing matter cept how do you attack he in whom you don't believe. If you really don't believe why attack?
Posted by: Howie at October 10, 2005 11:46 AM (D3+20)
4
Yes, Carlos, that is one part of the business they are in. These activist judges will do whatever they can to destroy Christianity and whatever tradition might remain in the US. They know that the only way to destroy the US is to destroy the traditions and mores that unite us as a people. The wish to destroy Christianity I don't get, because what will ultimately take its place will utterly destroy the liberals and the Left.
I am mystified by the motivation of the Left. What do they think will be accomplished? It is truly one of the mysteries of this age.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 10, 2005 11:55 AM (rUyw4)
5
Jesus,
The Bible speaks of anti-christs, and in my view this Lefties fit the bill to a tee.
The Constitution restricts the GOVERNMENT'S acts and motives, not the people's. That's why that court ruling is so fucked up. It's basically saying that the citizen's motives (the buyer) are improper. The BUYER'S motives are unconstitutional. If he was instead an atheist, the sale coult have gone through! Unbelievable. Could these activistas in black robes be anymore transparent? I think not.
Posted by: Carlos at October 10, 2005 12:09 PM (8e/V4)
6
I just read an interesting (maybe) Instapundit co-analysis of Joe's question, the roots of this by a guy named
James C. Bennett: which speaks to me as byproduct of anti-Catholic Protestant elitism:
This is primarily an effect of the Calvinist Puritan roots of American progressivism. Just as Calvinists believed in the centrality of the depravity of man, with the exception of a minuscule contingent of the Elect of God, their secularized descendants believe in the depravity and cursedness of Western civilization, with their own enlightened selves in the role of the Elect.
HTH
Posted by: -keith in mtn. view at October 10, 2005 12:12 PM (T85lV)
7
Brian took the words out of my mouth. I'd only add that Paulson is being disengenuous. He's attacking a target closer to home.
Keith, while Calvinists and other Reformed thinkers believe in the depravity of man - and who can fault that kind of thinking?
- they believe that only God can regenerate the heart. This doesn't make them less the sinner; the Holy Spirit works in their life through discipleship in scripture and fellowship toward their sanctification.
It often seems that He's working faster in some of us than in others. Paulson could clearly benefit from a less-stony heart.
To complete your analogy, one must remove a personal God from the equation, putting human wisdom and understanding at the pinnacle. With that sort of equation, it's easy to see how some of us believe we should be in authority over others, like shephards and sheep. Democracy is much more respectful of the individual.
Posted by: tee bee at October 10, 2005 12:27 PM (q1JHF)
8
I don't believe that any government entity should promote or discourage religion in any way whatsoever, but these people are on an anti-crusade, but we shouldn't be surprised, because they're just a bunch of ACLU commies. I'm an atheist, but not like them, not at all; these people make me sick and are traitors to the prinicples of Liberty.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 10, 2005 01:44 PM (0yYS2)
9
IM,
you're the kind of atheist I can live with-- that we HAVE lived with since the founding of this country. But these anti-God types are out of control.
Posted by: Carlos at October 10, 2005 01:54 PM (8e/V4)
10
Carlos, the sentiments are mutual. I have nothing against Christians, and even think that Christianity is a necessary influence to the development of civil society, I'm just not wild about government involvement in religion. After all, do we want to look to the same government that gave us Amtrak and Social Security for our spiritual guidance?
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 10, 2005 02:01 PM (0yYS2)
11
Another wretched atheist trying to force himself on us all why should we be allow these jerks to force themselves on us they are your usial selfish self centered soclialists forcing the,selves on us and getting help from the supreume court and its band of idiots
Posted by: sandpiper at October 10, 2005 02:04 PM (U+eLg)
12
IM,
the Europeans do. Their churches are state-sponsored. Their pastors are paid by the State. Ironic, no?
Posted by: Carlos at October 10, 2005 02:06 PM (8e/V4)
13
Fuck it, I'm going to attack Buddha. I'm going to punch that fat bastard right in the nose and wipe that silly smile off his smug little face. Grrrrrr! A little off topic: Type "Failure" into google, then press "I'm feeling lucky" and see what comes up. Hmmmmm...
Posted by: osamabinhiding at October 10, 2005 02:12 PM (Ttija)
14
osama,
that's why I don't use google anymore. They can no longer be trusted.
Posted by: Carlos at October 10, 2005 02:13 PM (8e/V4)
15
Osama,
So that's where you bin hiding. You're a googlebomber. How cute!
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 10, 2005 02:48 PM (rUyw4)
16
Yeah, it kind of makes you wonder, eh? Their stock is hyped anyway...
Posted by: osamabinhiding at October 10, 2005 03:42 PM (Ttija)
17
Jesus... One man, huge damage to humanity for thousands of years and to the future.
The guy who inspired Muhammed who we all know led his masses to such a sofisticated and peaceful situation they are in today, the guy because of whom the Romano-Catholic church exists, most evil organisation of all times that had entire religions wiped out, peoples hunted to extinction, masses cowed to brainless lemmings and riches looted to it's replacement-of-Jesus-on-earth leader for 15 horrible, bloody, dark centuries.
Therefore I'm suggesting attacking Jesus now is absolutely useless, the Jews should have had him stoned before or right after he made a mess at their temple.
Posted by: A Finn at October 10, 2005 04:53 PM (lGolT)
18
they tried but he escaped. they also tried after he healed the blind man on the sabbath but again they could not see him although he was right there. Odd huh? so finn want a copy of John I got one for you too.
Posted by: Howie at October 10, 2005 05:00 PM (D3+20)
19
Yes Carlos, it is ironic, but it is also part of why Europeans no longer go to church.
And sandpiper, cut the "wretched atheist" crap. I don't go around saying "wretched Christian" every time a priest molests a little boy, do I? Watch your manners and remember, like I do, that it's acts, not labels, that are important.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 10, 2005 09:26 PM (0yYS2)
20
No thanks, Howie, I think I have a bible of some sort somewhere, or at least the New Testament in a little red pocket book (some preachers travel the country giving those to everyone... I've had 3 or so, they always manage to disappear, since they're leather coated and there's a dog in the house). So it was the inefficiency of fundamentalist Jews that allowed Jesus to live and preach on? Guess the J00s can be blamed for everything one way or another....
Posted by: A Finn at October 11, 2005 04:15 AM (cWMi4)
21
FWIW, IM, sandpiper, who makes me wonder if there are indeed commentbots, is best overlooked - and I think was just commenting on Paulson, not you. The bots rarely talk to other commenters.
Posted by: tee bee at October 11, 2005 08:58 AM (q1JHF)
22
Yes just like fin to be such a pigheaded fool. You woild think he would believe in God since it's a supernatural that some one has not bashed his thick skull in by now.
Posted by: Howie at October 14, 2005 10:02 AM (D3+20)
23
JESUS, IS GIVING EVERY MAN, WOMAN, & CHILD "ONE LAST CHANCE". NO MATTER HIS OR HER RACE, RELIGION, OR NATIONALITY; TO REPENT & TURN FROM THEIR WICKED WAY; CONFESS JESUS CHRIST, AS LORD AND SAVIOUR. AND DO HIS WILL. mcgdogm
Posted by: mcgdogm at November 28, 2005 02:54 PM (6krEN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 05, 2005
Army of Ansar al-Sunnah Murder Hostages by Beheading, Video Released (Images)
The Army of Ansar al-Sunnah, a well-known terrorist organization in Iraq with ties to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's al Qaeda forces, has released a video in which two hostages are beheaded. The Jawa Report has obtained a copy of the video. Gruesome images from the video are posted below (WARNING: GRAPHIC IMAGES BELOW).
The two innocent civilians are identified as Shaker Mahmoud Jassim and Riyadh Najim Abdullah. The timestamp on the video indicates it was made on September 12th of this year, but the video was not uploaded to the internet until today.
As in all such videos, the terrorists first force the victims to 'confess' to various crimes before they are murdered. Pronouncement of guilt is made on the victims under Islamic law. Thus, the murder and torture done by the terrorists is legitimized in the eyes of radicals as the legal execution of criminals for crimes against Islam. The beheading is done with a knife, is slow, and very painful.
Jassim is forced in the video to 'confess' that he works for the U.S. Army as an informant. As in all jihadi videos, American forces are portrayed as tools of a wider Jewish conspiracy.
The AP reports that Jassim urges in his 'confession':
I call on everyone who works with the Jews and the Americans to repent to God and leave this job.
In all previous hostage murder videos, similar statements are made. The second victim, Abdullah, said he helped the Americans with information about a group of Saudi insurgents and was paid a large amount of money:
"We have become slaves to money," he said before he was taken outside and decapitated.
SITE reports that the video also warns:
That those who do not “come back to your religion and repent” will also be slaughtered.
As Abdullah's head is placed on his back, the camera panned to a sign that read in Arabic: "Go to hell, this is a revenge for our brothers".
The Army of Ansar al-Sunna is an offshoot of The Army of Ansar al-Islam, a Salafist terror organization with roots in Kurdish Iraq. After the fall of the Hussein Regime, the former leader of Ansar al-Islam, Musab al-Zarqawi, took foreign elements to found Tawhid and Jihad--later pledging loyalty to Osama bin Laden and changing the name, once again, to al Qaeda in the Land of Two Rivers (Mesopotamia, or Iraq). Ansar al-Sunnah and al Qaeda are believed to operate seperately now, but occasionally announce collaboration with one another.
This is the first beheading video in many months. These types of videos are propaganda meant for domestic purposes. The reason the terrorists in Iraq stopped producing beheading murder videos, and instead turning to videos of IED and other attacks on U.S. forces, is because they believed that they were doing more harm than good. Such videos tend to turn off the great mass of the Iraqi people, and especially Sunni Muslims on whom the terrorists depend for support and anonymity.
This video can only mean one thing: the terrorists have run into a wall in Iraq, they feel they must resort to threatening the population once again. The terrorists are slowly but surely losing.
Graphic images from the video below:
WARNING: PROCEED AT OWN RISK.
Why show these images? This is the true face of the so-called insurgents in Iraq. They are nothing more than terrorists scum who have a vision for Iraq similar to that of the Taliban in Afghanistan. They are waging jihad not only against Americans, but against Iraqis. Most media outlets will not show you what the terrorists are actually doing in Iraq. We will.
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
03:44 PM
| Comments (26)
| Add Comment
Post contains 673 words, total size 6 kb.
1
Yes, Rusty, every American adult should view these images so they can see the barbarians we are up against. If we sit around and wait 20 years and do nothing, then this is what will be going on here in the US. God forbid it!
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 05, 2005 04:46 PM (rUyw4)
2
I choose not to watch the videos. Just the same shit as before. Why see them again. More proof these people are not civilized. ARE THEY WORTH SAVING?
Posted by: greyrooster at October 05, 2005 06:06 PM (ywZa8)
3
Rooster - I totally get your point. At the same time, when a beheading becomes "old hat," then something is wrong. Each one should shock us and spur us into action. The images should strengthen our resolve to complete the task and send the murderers to their deaths.
Posted by: RomeoDelta at October 05, 2005 08:00 PM (Srmrz)
4
RomeoDelta: You're right. I just figure if the bastards figure I'm not going to view them maybe someone will be saved.
Posted by: greyrooster at October 05, 2005 08:44 PM (ywZa8)
5
Rush Limbaugh says America is at war, He is right on that count. However, Rush is a draft dodging drug addict that has no concept of 'war'. His foolish war is about 'ratings' and disagrrement between political ideology.
Al-Qaeda and like MUSLIM organizations have sworn their life and children to the destruction of INFIDELS. That would be YOU, Mr. and Mrs. America!
Visit HERE=> http://www.angelfire.com/scifi/contact1/pg4.html
Posted by: Beheading Videos at October 05, 2005 09:48 PM (tX99K)
6
And these "insurgents" are heros to millions, huh? What is wrong with this picture? I wonder what would happen if the media all of a sudden started calling a terrorist a terrorist? Maybe the world at large would get the idea .. finally. Beheaders are brutal, savage terrorists, period!
Posted by: Bubbe at October 05, 2005 10:23 PM (cbAi4)
7
Iraq's population out of Iraq NOW! eh?
Yet again, the "root causes" of terrorism theory is completely blown by the senseless murder of their fellow Muslim neighbors.
As usual coerced "confessions" are used to make the citizen confess to being an apostate which reaches it's sickening crescendo when the cutting off another Muslims head stops.
I cannot comprehend the abject terror these men faced being lead out to their execution, knowing the brutal methods employed, and how long it takes to die, nor the pain inflicted upon them. may they find peace.
Funny how you never see these images at a leftard rally, declaring the victories of the "minute men"
Posted by: dave at October 06, 2005 12:20 AM (CcXvt)
8
bunch of idiots killing their own people...and the worse part is that this *army's of god** whatever they call themselfs still find support from muslins?? when they goin to wake up and realize that they just wan to see blood they kill like 200 iraqis just to kill one american who is really killing their people us or them??
Posted by: realtouch at October 06, 2005 01:25 AM (SDgrr)
9
Dave: they'd probably be in a state of shock as soon as they started that last walk. As for the amount of time it takes to kill: have you ever read up on how kosher beef is slaughtered? A cut to the throat takes only a short moment to kill any creature. They're most likely dead long before the blade hit the bone. Not to mention that the windpipe was likely severed, the body under those conditions isn't going to sustain.
And for all of those here that believe you're still alive for six seconds after being beheaded: consider that cutting off a finger can put a person into shock, getting your head cut off would probably do the same.
Also dave, who ever said the left wing says we're winning? If anything that's more of a right wing state of thinking. The left consider this continuing battle a loss, another Nam.
Realtouch: beheaded one's own citizenry is by no means new. The french (at the time considered the most civilized society) had beheadings. And yes, we're americans, we hate the french, but being intelligent americans we recognize that history repeats itself. The middle east is doing what all other societies have done in the past. This type of violence is infamous in history.
And for all of you who would berate me for what i've just said: I've served in the IDF in the reserve unit Sar-El. My first base being Anatot which lies right on the border of the West Bank.
Posted by: WizrdKing at October 06, 2005 02:50 AM (xxmfk)
10
WizardKing:
As you mentioned the French Revolution, You have most likely read the same litrature as I, that spoke of the head of the scientist that was rumored to have blinked thirteen times, after he said he would try to blink until he lost consciousness after decapitation. Truly a thought that kept me awake. Although your original assessment is correct, hypovolemic shock would most likely set in as soon as the head were severed.
As for the Left, I was mentioning Micheal Moore's reference to the terrorists as "Minute men" as some of the left call them, or the "Iraqi Resistance" and why they ignore the blatant barbarism, you will never hear them mention it!
Posted by: dave at October 06, 2005 07:01 AM (CcXvt)
11
Wizrdking: My problem with your blog is as follows. (1) I cut my left middle finger off in a boat propeller once. IT HURT LIKE HELL. When they reattached it it HURT LIKE HELL. And for 6 weeks afterward in HURT LIKE HELL. Try it.
(2) We slaughter animals all the time. Hogs and steers. Dead before the knife hits the bone. Bullshit! After trying the Jewish system I now shoot them between the eyes first to save the animal pain. Just Jewish propoganda to justify their cruel method of slaughter. What Jews do to animals is their business but don't feed me bullshit to justify it. I justify it as another cruelity brought about by religion. I don't fight against kosher butchering (butchering is a good word for it) because I figure mother nature is much more cruel.
If you guys choose to dress funny and not eat pork chops I will fight for your right to be as you are. But don't feed me bullshit. I could change my mind.
Posted by: greyrooster at October 06, 2005 07:02 AM (M7kiy)
12
Wizardking:
Just thought of something else that doesn't go down right.
"BEING AN AMERICAN" You served in the IDF. Have you served in the United States Military? Hmmmmm.
Is that like "being an American I served in the PLO".
WEIRD!
Posted by: greyrooster at October 06, 2005 07:12 AM (M7kiy)
13
oh, the Muslims were beheading people hundreds of years before France started, they've just never stopped. Mohammed himself was present at the mass beheading of a Jewish tribe in Medina. It will never be history to Islam unless they rewrite their Koran and the sections like:
"
Therefore, when ye meet the Unbeliever's in fight, smite at their necks; at length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind the captives firmly: therefore is the time for either generosity or ransom until the war lays down its burdens. "
To name but a few.
Posted by: dave at October 06, 2005 07:12 AM (CcXvt)
14
Beheading videos: Ah! But Rush tells it like it is. He is a tool and has much value.
Posted by: greyrooster at October 06, 2005 07:15 AM (M7kiy)
15
Well I for one am glad to hear that the the terrorists have run into a wall. Between turning the corner,last throes, acts of desperation, et al I was beginning to think that our side was running low on positive meraphors. Rusty the converse view of your analysis id that the Army of Ansar now believes that poblic opinion is now so strongly behind them that they now will accept such videos. The vote on the constitution is coming up very soon after all the great things that were said about it "historic" the odds (English bookmakers) are lookung lomg, and a civil/religous war looking more possible. Will these United States decide to support one side over the other ? or actlike a referee and just try and keep them apart.A noble effort,peacekeeping, but it may make us a target for both sides, As far as journalists being shot; Rusty the only way to win this war is to show our moral superiorty. Rusty if we do start executing politically incottect/anti war journalists for not toeing the party line should we do videos also? Tp deter others? What about bloggers who defame these United States? Or politicans who vote against abuse and torture? What about bloggers who link to sites that show propoganda coming from the enemy? What about .........YOU !!!
Posted by: john Ryan at October 06, 2005 08:00 AM (ads7K)
16
Ryan I have a better one. WHAT ABOUT YOU!
Posted by: greyrooster at October 06, 2005 08:23 AM (M7kiy)
17
Word of caution to the uninformed: these terrorists slowly behead their victims. They use knives. The victims can be heard trying to scream and breathe as the knife cuts and air rushes from their lungs. These are not men with swords who take the heads in one chop.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at October 06, 2005 09:18 AM (JQjhA)
18
John Ryan:
You know what wins wars better than "Moral Superiority" ? actual firepower, and weapon superiority and the willingness to use it.
The PC nature of this war, and the constant attempt to not offend delicate Muslim sensibilities, while allowing the label of "religion of peace" to be used constantly is really degrading the war effort.
Posted by: dave at October 06, 2005 10:03 AM (CcXvt)
19
Greyrooster, Sar-El is a multi-national volunteer reserve unit. It draws members from all around the globe. Sorry if i didn't clarify that earlier
Posted by: WizrdKing at October 06, 2005 12:00 PM (x8oLi)
20
John Ryan: fingers on home keys, please.
And your yammering is getting on my nerves. Your constant blathering about "we have to keep the moral high ground" is duly noted. Mkay? How many times are you going to keep repeating the same mantra? At this point, we could descend much farther down the ladder of "morality" and still be leaps and bounds above the enemy. We can never reach the level of morality others have set for us. We're human. We make mistakes. We try to correct them.
Morality will not win this war. They're idea of morality, and all those who support the "insurgency", is far removed from what ours is. They do not recognize that morality. What will win this war is killing the enemy and demoralizing all those who might consider joining the enemy. Period.
Take a step outside your perfect little bubble of idealism and have a good hard look at what's going on in the world. And since you're so good at preaching morals, why don't you just head right on over to the middle east and preach to the jihadis and their supporters what "morality" is.
Posted by: Oyster at October 06, 2005 12:05 PM (YudAC)
21
Thank you for posting those heinous pictures. We get way too comfortable over here in the USA, just seeing anti-American images on TV. And the vast majority of Americans totally forget about 9-11 and forget about the true nature of those with whom we are at war.
Posted by: reverse_vampyr at October 06, 2005 02:11 PM (Ns5kk)
22
America is at war with itself, fools.
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at October 07, 2005 05:57 AM (A5eqb)
23
Downing street Moron: I believe Al Sharpton 1st made that quote. Oh well! Birds of a feather say the same things together. What it be willie.
Posted by: greyrooster at October 07, 2005 10:19 AM (M7kiy)
24
The guy in the second picture looks like Downing Street Moron's daddy. His mommy has nappy hair. I guess he's what you call a black muslim.
Ha! I just discovered the reason for his hatred of white America.
Posted by: greyrooster at October 07, 2005 10:23 AM (M7kiy)
25
At least we can take comfort from the fact that they were beheaded in an introspective, peaceful inner struggle, culturally sensitive sort of way. I want to hear Bush talk more about this religion of peace I keep hearing about.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at November 19, 2005 11:02 AM (0yYS2)
26
colobration with invader that what they deserve
you forget that american killing thousand iraqi innocent and use the camical wapeon and use everything to take a free oil .that what they deserve die .....even no muslim japnees or comminist will make the same way to those colobration with invaders
safi
Posted by: foula at November 30, 2005 07:01 AM (jEsFz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Email a terrorist XXXIV
We seem to be having a lot of posters you know the kind that post on old threads and say stuff like this:
Falluja
gg@ww.com
victory to the islamic army and the army of the mujahedeen,,allahu akbar. good is great.
I doubt that email is a good one but I disagree good is just good not great.
Also a live one on this thread.
Although our motto is bit different he is still watching you.
Our contacts thread is also a good one.
Posted by: Howie at
12:35 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 91 words, total size 1 kb.
October 03, 2005
RINO Sightings, Little Piggies and Other Strange Happenings.
New RINO sightings is up itÂ’s unearthly strange.
No more little piggie stress relievers. Gees give me a break. I hereby vow to eat left over pork chops at lunch every day for the duration of Ramadan.
Hat Tip: Big thanks to Mike at Mr. Muffler for getting Howie back on the road again for cheap.
In other strange and paranormal news Howie gets a beyond the Grave visit and interview with Ben Franklin. Actually IÂ’ve been worried about buying propane and propane related accessories this year. Mainly the fuel, I mean IÂ’m sitting on bone dry empty and winter is coming on. I entered the FS(thatÂ’s farm service city slicker) drawing for 100 bucks worth of free propane. Turns out I won. I mean I freaking won is that weird or not. Even stranger than that, Mr. FranklinÂ’s ghost delivered the C note to my door. Below is a record of our exchange.
Updated: Ok no comment? Well let's try this. Scott Baio was on Arrested Development tonight as Lawyer Bob Loblaw. His lawfirm speicalizing in cool stuff like Fraud, Tax Evasion, money laundering. Hope you saw, it was good stuff.
Nipsey Russell has died Hat Tip: The Filthy One
Typhoone Longwang has struck China and 59 soldiers are missing. Aside from the name of the storm, not funny.
more...
Posted by: Howie at
01:36 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 483 words, total size 4 kb.
1
DEAR SWEET CHRIST! I MISSED IT!
Back to my flagellation room. Dammaaat
Posted by: Filthy Allah at October 04, 2005 07:44 AM (5ceWd)
2
THIS LITTLE PIGGIE WENT TO THE MARKET THIS LITTLE PIGGIE STAYED HOME THIS LITTLE PIGGIE HAD ROAST BEEF AND THIS LITTLE PIGGIE HAD NONE AND THIS LITTLE PIGGIE WENT WEE WEE WEE ALL THE WAY HOME
Posted by: sandpiper at October 04, 2005 02:45 PM (PObDu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
182kb generated in CPU 0.0384, elapsed 0.1426 seconds.
132 queries taking 0.119 seconds, 481 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
