Al Qaeda on the Run in Northern Iraq
Are things really all that bad in Iraq? Not according to those that are actually there. In a Pentagon press briefing today, a commander from Mosul, Iraq, described a much weakened al Qaeda presence in that region. At least 80% of al Qaeda fighters are dead or captured, and those fighting today are much less organized with far poorer training.
But how can things be getting better in Iraq when so much news--today's news--always seems so bad?
Flipping through the news this morning as I got ready for work, I noticed that CNN and Fox were reporting some very bad news from people who should know how things are going, reporters in Baghdad. However, one thing seemed rather odd to me--both reporters had the same background shot.
In fact, both reporters were at the same Baghdad hotel well inside the Green Zone. So, how are they getting their news? They are getting their news from the DOD just like I am, only they can broadcast their original news from Iraq and thus you get the feeling that they are more authoritative because they are, you know, there, even though there isn't really anywhere near where the stories are happening.
Journalists such as Michael Yon are the exception to the rule. He's embedded with military forces in Mosul, so when Yon reports that things are much better in Mosul today than last year, you better believe him. Yon is actually there where there is.
So, when Army Col. Robert B. Brown, commander of the 1st Brigade, 25th Infantry Division's Stryker Brigade Combat Team, reported from Mosul, Iraq, about conditions there you better listen, too. Remember, Yon is embedded with these guys. Stryker Brigade News has a great gallery of the men of the 1/25 here.
Here are some highlights from a DOD press release about Brown's conference. And by 'highlights', I mean pretty much the whole press release. But, as you read it, imagine that I am reporting from inside the Green Zone. I'm sure that will make it much more believable. Here's a visual, to help put you in the mood.

Brown notes that eighty percent of al Qaeda's network in northern Iraq "has been devastated" since January due to the capture or killing of key leaders and the outrage of Iraqi citizens.
The situation in Mosul is "improving on a daily basis," Brown said. "Normalcy has come back into the city."
That wasn't the case prior to the Iraqi elections held in January, Brown recalled, when his soldiers "faced a foreign fighter that was very well-trained." However, the situation has changed significantly since then, he said.
Several events caused the decline of terrorist influence in Mosul over the past year by, Brown said. For one, Mosul's citizens, who'd had enough of the murder of innocent women and children by al Qaeda-sponsored terrorists, began supporting their new government after the elections.
Carnage wrought by foreign terrorists also has caused Iraqis who used to favor the return of the defunct Saddam Hussein regime to change sides and support the new Iraqi government, Brown said.
Today, Mosul's citizens routinely identify insurgents and provide other information to U.S., coalition and Iraqi security forces, Brown said.
"People are fed up with the terrorists' acts," the colonel said, noting that Iraqis "want a brighter future."
Many key al Qaeda leaders in Iraq have been captured or killed in recent months, Brown said, affecting terrorist operations. Brown said enemy mortar attacks in his area have decreased to about six a month, compared to around 300 monthly prior to the January elections.
And "we have not seen well-trained foreign fighters" since the elections, Brown said. Foreign terrorists captured these days are poorly trained and "very young," he noted, ranging in age from 15 to 17 years old.
Al Qaeda is "clearly our biggest threat" in Iraq, Brown said. Of 550 terrorists killed during U.S.-coalition operations in northern Iraq during February and March, he estimated between 60 percent and 70 percent of enemy casualties were foreign fighters.
Brown said he's very proud of his hard-working soldiers. The brigade's victories against terrorists haven't come without cost, he noted, with 33 having lost their lives in Iraq over the past 11 months.
However, the brigade's trademark vehicle has "saved hundreds of my soldiers' lives," Brown asserted. He said 115 rocket-propelled-grenade rounds, as well as myriad machine-gun bullets, have failed to penetrate the Stryker's tough skin during his brigade's tour in Iraq.
The Stryker has "done a fantastic job here in Iraq," Brown said.
Check out Stryker Brigade News, which is very bloggy, for more info coming out of Northern Iraq.
Posted by: Rusty at
05:21 PM
| Comments (19)
| Add Comment
Post contains 786 words, total size 6 kb.
1
And then there is Baghdad...
Posted by: Ariya at September 14, 2005 08:08 PM (noCGr)
2
Yes, we'll always have Baghdad, but'cha can't go back to Constantinople!
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 14, 2005 10:27 PM (0yYS2)
3
As you know the greatest casualty in war is the truth. Propaganda wil be churned out on a daily basis by all sides. The mainstream media whom are treated with absolute derision in this blog and others, are accused of having an anti Bush and an anti war agenda. Yet you favour reading official Government Defense Dept presss briefings to independent accounts from international news agencies. Has it not occurred to that the few select journalists actually with the army might be there for one reason and one reason alone, that is, report on what the government wants to be reported? Personally I would prefer to read the MSM even if at times it is incorrect,than read what the government wants me to read.
It is one thing to read something which is incorrect, it is another to read state spun lies.
Posted by: Conor at September 15, 2005 04:44 AM (4PPsx)
4
Why do so many people think Michael Yon is a reputable source for information? Did it ever cross your mind that what he reports is first filtered through the US military censors? What he reports is just as sanitized as what the Pentagon feeds the reporters hiding in the Green Zone.
The casualty counts speak for themselves.
Posted by: OB Kenobi at September 15, 2005 05:10 AM (p8hE4)
5
I think more people would be open to the news from the mainstream media, if it were not one sided, everything is a disaster,with no progress made and "insurgents" in every ally.
The fact is that centcom and other military sources regularly make press releases about the rebuilding effort, about new schools, hospital repairs, individual units that have donated to causes to benefit the Iraqi people -- the msm ignore them and put out the latest threat from AQ in Iraq, or the story about "lawlessness" in city's overwhelmed by "insurgents"
I find it amusing that somehow you believe that international press are in Iraq for altruistic reasons, but the military press, well they're just Government mouth pieces? I think this blog has proven time and time again that the msm is one sided, even down to the google news article the other day that listed numerous success stories in Iraq that the military had published, not one had been picked up by any news outlet in google news.
Posted by: dave at September 15, 2005 06:49 AM (CcXvt)
6
So Dave
Whether you beleive it or not, Iraq is in a state of war, with atrocities being committed on a daily basis if not an hourly basis. Do you honestly think people will be fooled into thinking that things are going swimmingly well because allied troops have opened a hospital or are seen receiving a warm welcome by some villagers in an area say untouched by the fighting? Come on, smarten up, the real issues are the suicide bombs, the loss of life, the destruction.
Accusing the MSM of bias is a bit rich! How do you think blogs get their news if not the MSM? Look at the posts and you will see that most acknowledge the source, i.e a major news agency. The blogger's narration is just his spin.
Posted by: Conor at September 15, 2005 07:23 AM (4PPsx)
7
Actually Conor, what I believe is when the "boots on the ground" say that things are getting better in Iraq, and that significant progress is being made. There are numerous blogs that focus on stories from soldiers.
It seems however, you prefer to believe the reporters in their "Ivory towers" inside the relatively safe "greenzone" hotels have some better prospective? well I guess enough of them have hired people with links to terrorists to film footage for them -- so I guess point taken.
The homicide bombings are now at the point, where they mainly target civilians and Iraqi security forces, this is eventually weaking the support for the insurgency, even the Sunni's are beginning to get tired of it.
The focus is now on making the Iraqi security forces autonomous so they can deal with the terrorists themselves, they're also attempting to bring the weaker insurgents (nationals, non-baathists) to the political arena, while rooting the hardliners out of every safe haven they flee to. While the "back" of the Insurgency is not broken, it is obvious that the terrorists are now losing support from the people that once concealed them, now their relative safety comes from grouping together in border towns, rather than the strongholds they once held inside the Sunni triangle (Fallujah/Mosul/Najaf/etc.)
If you're not seeing progress, I'm not sure what I can say to point out the obvious.
Posted by: dave at September 15, 2005 08:25 AM (CcXvt)
8
Given the political climate, it is highly unlikely that you will read anything unsavoury about the war. I sincerely doubt that any soldier, rank or file is going to say anything that would counter the official line
However I am willing to concede that a vast number of the terrorists have been annihilated. Targetting the civillian population instead of the Allied forces is a sign of their desperation, but like an injured animal they will become more deadly. There seems to be no shortage of suicide bombers and to think that the threat is lessening is allowing yourself to fall into a false sense of security.
I dont believe for one moment that the administration is discounting the threat of the terrorists. In fact they might be more worried about further terrorist atrocities.
But the reportage of the war is always going to be a contentious issue. You read the news and make your own mind up. Or you accept what you're told by your leaders.
Posted by: Conor at September 15, 2005 08:56 AM (4PPsx)
9
When was the last time Fallujah was in the news?
My only dispute with the report is the 80% number. 80% of what? I have a hard time believing they have a good enough idea on the total number of terrorists in Iraq.
That said, we are making real progress in Iraq.
Posted by: Marcus Aurelius at September 15, 2005 09:08 AM (ERx6z)
10
Conor:
The fact is the MSM "doom and gloom" reporting potrays that there is no
good news from Iraq -- ever.
There is news of homicide bombings, ambushes, kidnappings and the like, but never the same airtime discussion is given to capture, or killing of terrorists, or their leaders, or even some of the good things that do happen in Iraq.
This causes the fear of uncertainty, and potrays Iraq as a Kennedy like "Quagmire", with the deaths of soldiers, civilians and contractors achieving nothing -- this undermines the War effort, I often hear the words of insurgents propaganda releases, more than I hear a command element discussing the War on the News.
I do not discount the terrorists, I believe the threat is not over, not even close but studies of Insurgency find the hardest part of breaking it, is the local support for insurgents --The terrorists themselves seem to be taking care of that by killing civilians enmass.
The problems that are left are cutting terrorist supply lines, while maintaining our own, destroying safe havens and establishing safety for the citizens.
Posted by: dave at September 15, 2005 10:03 AM (CcXvt)
11
It kills me how the leftards come on here and post their idiocy expecting to convince anyone of anything. Here's a tip, morons; not only are you not going to convince anyone with a brain with your idiotic, treasonous propaganda, you're only making things worse for yourselves. Especially you cocksuckers who automatically think that anything any military person says is a lie. Let me tell you worthless little shits something; one soldier is worth more than all of you combined, and the sooner you are all taken out and shot, the better. How you think you will be able to get away with taking the side of the enemy is beyond me; you are all traitors and pretty soon things are going to go very badly for you. Don't waste your time here, because your childish lies won't get you anywhere with us.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 15, 2005 10:06 AM (0yYS2)
12
Well Dave, I dont news what you get, but over here in London we get plenty of news. Good news and bad news.
Improbulus Maximus
Great post! When you learn to conduct yourself in an adult manner perhaps I will engage you in a debate. Until then take your cretinous remarks to another blog where they would be more appreciated. Have you considered changing your handle to Ignoramus Maximus? Beleive it would be more apt you pathetic little irk
Posted by: Conor at September 15, 2005 10:22 AM (4PPsx)
13
Well Dave, I dont news what you get, but over here in London we get plenty of news. Good news and bad news.
Improbulus Maximus
Great post! When you learn to conduct yourself in an adult manner perhaps I will engage you in a debate. Until then take your cretinous remarks to another blog where they would be more appreciated. Have you considered changing your handle to Ignoramus Maximus? Beleive it would be more apt you pathetic little irk
Posted by: Conor at September 15, 2005 10:23 AM (4PPsx)
14
Conor:
If it's anything like the reporting I saw from the Daily Mail on the Hurricane, I find it hard to believe the U.K press is any different!
Posted by: dave at September 15, 2005 10:43 AM (CcXvt)
15
I don't want to engage you in debate you piece of shit, I want to see you bleed out slowly.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 15, 2005 12:21 PM (0yYS2)
16
Ignoramus Maximus
What's wrong? Watching too many action movies? " I want to see you bleed slowly" Wow, I can see that you were a clever little boy at school, not!. Maybe you're a girl, because you bitch like best of them.
Posted by: Conor at September 16, 2005 02:16 AM (4PPsx)
17
Ignoramus Maximus
What's wrong? Watching too many action movies? " I want to see you bleed slowly" Wow, I can see that you were a clever little boy at school, not!. Maybe you're a girl, because you bitch like best of them.
Posted by: Conor at September 16, 2005 02:16 AM (4PPsx)
18
Dave
The Daily Mail is a tabloid rag. The other papers in the UK, both left and right wing were equally critical of the official response to the hurricane.
Posted by: Conor at September 16, 2005 09:21 AM (4PPsx)
19
So, Joseph Conor, do you think that you can't be found? Do you think that your muslim boyfriend will keep you safe? Tell me, does he do you before or after his goat, or does he make you blow the goat after he's done with it? You're a disgusting little dhimmi bitch, and I hope the next 'slamotard bomber gets you.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 16, 2005 10:03 AM (0yYS2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
33kb generated in CPU 0.0392, elapsed 0.1399 seconds.
118 queries taking 0.1116 seconds, 263 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.