January 03, 2005
Pakistan Goes at it Alone to Aid Tsunami Victims
As I like to report good news from smaller nations directly effecting the GWOT, it is a pleasure to post on
Pakistan sending out aid packages and military equipment to the tsunami ravages areas of SE Asia.
ISLAMABAD, January 03 (Online): Pakistan stepping up its efforts to provide disaster relief assistance to the countries hit by earthquake and tsunami in South and Southeast Asia would send seven military planes to Indonesia and two naval ships to Sri Lanka today.
Six to seven sorties of two C-130 aircraft are being sent to Indonesia from Monday to deploy one composite engineering task force and one field hospital.
Two Naval ships carrying helicopters together with a Marine Expeditionary force as well as doctors, paramedics, medical supplies, relief goods and foodstuff to Sri Lanka would be dispatched on Monday as well.
The State Bank of Pakistan has also announced that all of its branches as well as the branches of National Bank, Habib Bank, United bank, Muslim Commercial Bank and Allied Bank will receive donations to the President Relief Fund for Tsunami victims. Donations and contributions from foreign countries, will be received at Pakistan Missions.
Pakistan, much like the U.S., Australia, Japan and India, have decided a "go at it alone" policy works best in times of a crisis. They have virtually shunned the United Nations due to the UN's failure to do anything worthwhile in terms of aid to the effected area and are sending aid themselves. Kudos to Pakistan and Pakistanis contributing.
Cross-posted at In the Bullpen
Posted by: Chad at
12:08 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 273 words, total size 2 kb.
1
but but but.. What about Moral Authority? Kofi assures us only he can bring relief!!
Posted by: Sharp as a Marble at January 03, 2005 12:24 PM (VxPRK)
2
As in "I'll relieve you of all those funds, thank you."
Posted by: Brian B at January 03, 2005 03:39 PM (CouWh)
3
I'll have to rethink Pakistan. Surprised me. Until now the only thing I liked about Pakistan was program karachi cops.
Posted by: greyrooster at January 04, 2005 03:28 PM (xRptl)
4
I think it's extractly smart to send your money to help thie people of the tsumani's by using the website that Bush named in the short press conference
Cindy
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at January 05, 2005 10:06 AM (D39Vm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Mess Hall Bomber was Saudi National
-
The Scotsman (via
Hyscience)
The suicide bomber who killed 22 people when he blew himself up in a US army mess tent the northern Iraqi city of Mosul, was a Saudi medical student, an Arab newspaper reported today.
Saudi-owned Asharq Al-Awsat identified him as 20-year-old Ahmed Said Ahmed al-Ghamdi, citing friends of the manÂ’s father.
The friends said members of an Iraqi resistance group contacted al-GhamdiÂ’s father to tell him his son was the suicide bomber who carried out the December 21 attack, the deadliest on an American installation in Iraq.
US officials have said their investigation indicates the bomber was dressed in an Iraqi military uniform – but was not an Iraqi soldier – when he slipped into a mess tent packed with soldiers eating lunch in northern Iraq.
The father refused to discuss the suicide bombing, but told the newspaper his son had gone to Iraq to fight the Americans and had died there.
Saudi nationals fighting a jihad while giving up their lives to attack Americans is nothing new, though that does not make is less disturbing. The man was reportedly recently married before he decided his wife must be too ugly not to want the 72 virgins promised by Jihadis when one martyrs himself.
For background information on the mess hall suicide bombing, click here for the initial news, here for an update and here for the communique relased by Ansar al-Sunna.
Cross-posted at In the Bullpen
Posted by: Chad at
10:41 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 254 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Was Kofi skiing for three days after the Tsunami or not? Why haven't people made more of that? I saw a Fox reporter ask the question and Kofi blow his top but this is the only article I can find.. http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/1/1/122440.shtml
Posted by: James at January 03, 2005 11:00 AM (rP4OC)
2
Kofi was skiing for four (4) days, he needed to work off his "Holiday parties" fat before worrying about victims. The bomber from Saudi show again how clearly this is a Muslim war on infidels. The Iranian embassy was the start of WW4 which should have been clear by the time the truck bombs went off in the Towers over a decade ago.
Rod Stanton
Cerritos
Posted by: Rod Stanton at January 03, 2005 12:26 PM (tHUgl)
3
I am left here once again wondering why the apathy toward this news? 15 of the 19 known 9/11 terrorists were also Saudi nationals, which has to make one ask just what are our policies and business dealings with other Saudi's? Are American interests in bed with our enemies over there, are American corporations counting cash profits from Saudi Arabia with one hand while wiping the blood of American GIs off with the other?
Posted by: Geoff at January 03, 2005 04:53 PM (6krEN)
4
Hey Rod: What happened to WW3? I must have been sleeping again. SF
Posted by: greyrooster at January 03, 2005 06:19 PM (XioYD)
5
My message to his father. I'm glad the sneeky little shit is dead. Couldn't hack it in raghead med school and couldn't hack it in marriage so he had to kill people. To cowardly to fight anyone while looking them in the eye. Not a hero, not a martyr. Just a cowardly little loser who couldn't handle the world. Shame on you for raising garbage.
Posted by: greyrooster at January 03, 2005 06:30 PM (XioYD)
6
Hey SF Ronnie won WW3 in the '80s
Posted by: Rod Stanton at January 04, 2005 06:49 AM (tHUgl)
7
I thought the peanut farmer won that one. I mean Iran gave up the hostages the day before Ronnie took over. Ha. WONDER WHY?
Posted by: greyrooster at January 04, 2005 03:38 PM (xRptl)
8
Like other thins,I told you this first.
Cindy
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at January 05, 2005 10:09 AM (D39Vm)
Posted by: greyrooster at January 05, 2005 03:59 PM (sqa1t)
10
I was talking to chad.
Cindy
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at January 05, 2005 04:54 PM (D39Vm)
11
Geoff- I am hoping questioning tone is sarcasm- because that is exactly what is happening- Bush is a couple hundred miles north of where he should have invaded.
Posted by: Max at January 13, 2005 12:27 PM (HFKAk)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Osama: Catalyst for Democracy
I'm a little late on linking to this, however better late than never. Jane at
Armies of Liberation has written a great post on how she feels Osama Bin Laden is becomming a
catalyst for Democracy, whether that is his intention or not. It is clearly a must-read and I urge all readers to go over and take a gander.
While you're thinking Democracy, Middle East and Iraq, read Arthur Chrenkoff's latest Good News from Iraq for the stories the MSM feels are not as newsworthy as the failures inside of Iraq. Chrenkoff continues to do amazing work in the area of sheding light on stories no one hears about.
Posted by: Chad at
10:21 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 118 words, total size 1 kb.
Syria to Open Iraqi Expat Polling Places
-
Associated Press
DAMASCUS, Syria - Iraqi expatriates in Syria will have the opportunity to vote in this month's Iraqi elections under an agreement signed Sunday between the Syrian government and the Geneva-based International Organization for Migration.
More than 250,000 Iraqis are believed to be living in Syria. Many of them fled here to escape worsening security conditions since the onset of the U.S.-led war that ousted former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein last year.
The agreement says Iraqis wishing to cast their votes in Syria must prove their eligibility and register at a Damascus election center from Jan. 17 to 23. Polling will take place over three days, from Jan. 28 to 30.
Anyone else see the problem with this? First off, Syria is not a Democracy therefore their "agreement" to offer polling places for those that have fled Iraq is a bit strange. Syria hasn't exactly supported Democracy in Iraq and is actually responsible for sending foreign fighters, weaponry and money to those that are killing innocent Iraqis and Coallition soldiers. What guarantees do Iraqis have that there will not be some kind of fishy results coming from the polling places in Syria?
Syria is controlled by the Baathist Party, very similar if not identical to the Baathist Party that used to run Iraq under Saddam Hussein. While the Syrian government is not as oppressive as Hussein's government, there are many similarties between the two. Hussein held elections in 1996 where he recieved 99 percent of the popular vote. Will the Baathists in Syria operate the Iraqi polling places in much the same way?
Syria is also housing Saddam loyalists who are working with terrorists entering Iraq. You might have heard of some of the terrorists the loyalists are working with. They include those who strap bombs to their waist and shout out Allah Akhbar before detonating their explosives belt in a crowded group of Iraqis. Why would the international community want these types of people to vote in an election that could help bring freedom to millions accross the region?
Cross-posted at In the Bullpen
Posted by: Chad at
10:16 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 361 words, total size 2 kb.
1
The only way this is a good idea, is if we (that is to say, the US military) use the opportunity to snatch a couple of high-value targets in Syria. Otherwise I'd say: If you want to vote in the Iraqi elections, get your ass back to Iraq!
Posted by: Dutch Expat at January 03, 2005 06:01 PM (FXmdX)
2
When you cast your vote, you explicitely state your support for the system you are voting under. There were a lot of arguments during undergrad years about whether one chooses to be a member of the society he was born in without an explicit declaration of that membership. I think it can be argued that without that explicite declaration of membership in one's society that one can argue that he is not bound by the rules of that society. Perhaps this is why some wackos on both sides can argue about civil disobedience allowing for the death of innocent employees of a bank, the destruction of capitalist owned buildings...or refusal to pay federal income taxes. I agree with Locke in his 2nd Treatise that society has a right to impose rules over those living within that society's borders. Willingly or not.
But when one votes, one makes an explicit declaration of inclusion within one's society. Whether an Iraqi ex-pat lives in Iran, Syria, Jordan or the US, even if they vote for the "most horrible" of all available choices, they become explicity enfranchised, and a willing participant. It's one more step in gluing together society in Iraq.
If one believes in conspiracies...and I've been a member of the vast right-winged conspiracy even before we were outed by Hillary...then this block of votes in Syria "might" vote en bloc and have some impact on the current election. But, if such a conspiracy is like all other conspiricies I've been told existed over the last, what, centuries? then not even the supposed members of the conspiracy probably know that it's going on.
Posted by: OregonGuy at January 04, 2005 03:51 PM (kztF0)
3
Excuse me! This really should have been updated. There are at least 7 different countries INCLUDING THE UNITED STATES that are setting up voting places for all the expats of Iraq.
Get your heads out of the sand.
Cindy
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at January 05, 2005 05:00 PM (D39Vm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 02, 2005
Immigration Reform Needed
-
Washington Post (via
Hyscience)
Smith is part of an effort to track down 370,000 "absconders" -- illegal immigrants who have disobeyed orders to leave the country. As part of a get-tough approach after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, the Homeland Security Department has deployed 18 fugitive squads to catch these immigrants, including a team in Maryland.
[snip]
At the top of the list were 6,000 absconders from Muslim and Middle Eastern countries, officials announced.
But by early 2003, authorities had resolved only 38 percent of those cases, either by detaining the immigrants or by confirming that they had left the country or gotten legal status, according to the 9/11 Commission. In a report on terrorist travel, the commission concluded: "It is very difficult to find alien absconders without extraordinary effort or pure luck."
The absconder program started after 9/11 and is directly responsible for tracking down illegal aliens. While I agree with this program, it should prove far easier as well as far more efficient to prevent as many illegals from entering the U.S. instead of hunting down those who have defied orders to leave.
Our lax border policy, which is borderline attrocious under President Bush, is a primary concern of mine since numerous reports of people of Middle Eastern descent have crossed our pourus border with Mexico. Our Border Patrol is both undermanned and tied up with full jails and restrictions upon apprehending illegals crossing for them to do anything.
When the Intelligence Bill passed in December, the crisis of immigration was put off until 2005 with a promise to re-visit the topic to put the best policy in place. While the passing of the Intelligence Bill by Congress was neeeded, there is a further need to actively enforce our immigration policy and patrol our borders with more than unmanned drones and stationary Border Patrol Agents.
Digger's Realm has led the blogger front in combating immigration issues with more ferver than anyone else concerning this topic. While he has written too many posts to link to, check out his archives and you will see illegal immigration is a threat to our national security.
Cross-posted at In the Bullpen
Posted by: Chad at
10:03 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 365 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Whoever ended the requirement for all aliens to register annually has a lot to answer for.
Posted by: Gene 6-Pack at January 03, 2005 08:59 AM (7XPVo)
2
I'm gonna say it again . . . You have to create laws that will give Illegal Aliens no reason to come . . If no one would hire an "Undocumented worker" for fear of having a $100k fine levied against him if caught . . economics would rule.
Deny citizenship to anyone who cannot read, write and speak english. And if you are born to an Illegal Alien in this country . . You're still an Illegal Alien . . Go Back whare you came from, submit the paperwork . . we'll look into it!
Posted by: large at January 03, 2005 11:36 AM (VRK2g)
3
Here is one issue that our president is totally wrong on; and his proposals to make legal pretty much all of the current illegals along with making things easier on those wishing to come here is way off base as to the best interests of the future of the USA. While our country is based on free, open immigration policy, we cannot sustain this in the long term and hope to preserve anything the likes of you and I know and love about America. This is one place it is best to defy the Bush policy and demand that the legislation from those looking to prevent this from happening is what gets passed this year. Bush would probably veto the bills but it would send him a message that he needs to listen to.
Posted by: Geoff at January 03, 2005 06:36 PM (6krEN)
4
LARGE: I agree with you accept. When I lived in Miami, I know several Cubans that escaped to America that were simply to old to learn a new language. In particular, with them living in an American community that only speaks spanish. I would like to see these people live out their days in freedom.
Most cities have locations where people can choose from many day laborers at minimum wage for a few days. I don't believe this is exploitation has the workers seem to be happy to get a few days wages. The equal of weeks of hard work in their home countries. This supplies a need on both sides. My heart goes out to them.
On the other hand, the wife soon has a baby at a welfare hospital. This makes it a U S citizen. This means we cannot send the parents back if we wanted to. They then sponsor the grandparents back whereever watching the rest of the kids. who again since they cannot speak the language or have marketable skills end up on the tax payers backs. The babies brothers and sisters (left behind while daddy jumped the border to find work) are permitted to come here to live because it would be cruel to separate the family. They then enroll in school and need special tutors (paid for by guess who) because the cannot speak english. Then American kids are told about cutbacks in school due to finances.
I believe illegals should be sent back and never have the privilege of applying again. If they cannot follow our immigration laws then why would they follow any other laws. Remember the LA riots. The blacks were doing the burning but who was emptying the stores.
Of course saying this makes me a RACIST as the vast majority of illegals are not white.
Posted by: greyrooster at January 03, 2005 07:35 PM (XioYD)
5
GEOFF: Granted but remember cheap labor for the super wealthy and super corporations is always on the republican agenda. As a republican I am well aware of this. The democrats may claim to be the saviors of the poor but ask the Unions (100 democrat) if they favor immigration.
Myself. I do not wish to pick the lettuce, carrots, onions, etc: I don't do well with a mop and bucket.
What ever happened to the bracero program? Where people could come, work, earn money and then return home. I guess that was degrading to workers with hungry families back home.
I thought that was the best thing since the long legged blond. (Whoops, racist remark again, left out short legged brunettes).
Remember the main rule of political parties.
When Republicans are in office they will do something greedy.
When Democrats are in office they will do something stupid.
Posted by: greyrooster at January 03, 2005 08:03 PM (XioYD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Saddam Speaks with His Lawyers
Saddam Hussein has met with his lawyers. DEBKA has learned some of the topics of the dicsussion between Hussein and one of his lawyers. It is interesting to say the least.
He had two main gripes. One was that the Americans will not let him shave his beard despite his repeated requests. He even offered to let a US military barber shave him, but they refused. His theory is that the Americans want to make sure that whenever he appears in public, as he did on June 30, 2004 before an Iraqi investigating judge, he will look confused, unkempt and too low in spirits to bother to shave.
His second complaint was against the Red Cross workers. He wanted their visits stopped because he said they are neither polite nor respectful.
- DEBKA
While the Red Cross has consistently make statements trying to get access to the most secretive captives held by the U.S. military for humanitarian reasons, I find it more than funny that Saddam does not wish to meet with them. Saddam, who is reportedly in better health now than he was prior to the war, has recieved good treatment and is even
writing poetry while in prison.
The nature of the strategic military role of Iraqi forces has been revealed. While the Coallition is facing insurgency coupled with terrorism, it was Saddam who ordered a switch to guerilla tactics.
Two days later, he called together the military commanders serving in the capital and its environs. They informed him they had run out of troops for conducting the war. It was then, Saddam said, “I ordered the transition to guerrilla warfare. I told the commanders: the Americans will stretch out full length across Iraq like a viper. That will be the moment to attack and lop off each section one by one.” The deposed president bragged: “All the insurgency and guerrilla operations in progress are the fruit of my decision and my pre-planning.”
While Saddam has made numerous statements in the past which are neither credible or accurate, the full extent of Saddam's call for a more guerilla style of warfare is not known. In all liklihood the above did occur however which is why many former Baathist Party and Saddam loyalists are leading the insurgency accross Iraq. There has been that transition into guerilla warfare, though any Saddam loyalists are being aided by terrorist groups and visa versa.
In Fallujah there were hundreds of Saddam loyalists fighting the United States as the U.S. cleared out the city. Many of the terrorists left the city prior to the invasion, but what was left was many of the old Iraqi army.
Saddam has never recognized Israel's right to exist, which is not entirely new in the Middle Eastern world. According to DEBKA's sources however, a deal from the Israelis and some Western sources would have centered upon Saddam recognizing Israel. This type of deal would not have detered the U.S. and allies who believed Saddam had WMDs, however this act would have sent shockwaves throughout the Middle East.
Cross-posted at In the Bullpen
Posted by: Chad at
12:53 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 524 words, total size 3 kb.
January 01, 2005
Iraqi Interest in Elections on the Rise
-
Washington Post
BAGHDAD, Jan. 1 -- The number of Iraqis making sure they are properly registered to vote has surged dramatically, officials said Saturday, calling the rise evidence of enthusiasm for the Jan. 30 elections despite continuing security concerns that have blocked the process in two provinces.
After a slow start to the six-week registration process that began Nov. 1, the number of voters making corrections to official voter lists more than doubled in the final week, according to a final tally quoted by election officials Saturday.
Officials said that more than 2.1 million people went to local election offices to assure that eligible members of their households could vote. About 1.2 million forms were submitted to add names to the voter lists, an involved process that requires providing proof of identification and residence.
Despite the constant threats by the terrorists inside of Iraq against Iraqis voting, Iraqis are eagerly awaiting January 30, the day of the scheduled elections. Iraqis do not have to register to vote, therefore there will of course be more than 2.1 million people voting on election day.
Signs of Democracy inside of Iraq are slow showing, however they are there. While terrorists and countries surrounding Iraq are actively fighting against the idea of Democracy in the Middle East, they are being aided by many of the media organizations based in the Middle East as well. Al Hura is perhaps the only exception, though they are funded by the U.S. government.
Al Jazeera has yet to run a piece on any of the candidates in Iraq and has only mentioned Democracy in passing. Iraqi newspapers have reported on the elections, however with over 200 daily newspapers in Iraq there are a few papers who are anti-Democracy. Of course a free press is crucial in a Democracy therefore any view is welcomed in a Democratic society.
News of increased interest in the elections as well as increased awareness is crucial in trying to quell the views expressed by both the world-wide media and several world leaders' opinions regarding what percentage of people voting would constitute a legitimate Democracy. While these views may not be accurate considering some of the comments have come from leaders in tyrannies and dictatorial regimes, there are others who need to recognize the election as legitimate in order for Democracy to succeed in Iraq.
Cross-posted at In the Bullpen
Posted by: Chad at
11:47 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 411 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I hope they have a good turnout. I do believe the attacks on voting places, personnel, etc: will slow down to nothing come voting day. Once the Islamofacists see its going to happen anyway there's not much they can do.
If election goes well and Iraqis show some courage it may well be the beginning of the end for terrorism in Iraq.
Where will they go next? Perhaps a very rich kingdom next door. One with 98% of the wealth controlled by a few thousand members of an extended family? Seems ripe for the picking.
Posted by: greyrooster at January 02, 2005 07:21 AM (eLjJa)
2
They will continue, probably to a lesser extent. The "Insurgents" are for a good part, Sunnis who wish to remain in power, and will forment civil war until the Iraqi Sunni Minority sucks it up and refuses to allow these people into their neighborhoods. It's a "native" thing, something all the Marines we send can't change!
Currently, WE are fighting their Civil War for them. (the Kurds and the Shiites)
Posted by: large at January 02, 2005 11:17 AM (VRK2g)
3
Could be: Just seems to me that once they realize they will not be in power they will not wish to give the Shias a reason to retaliate. I hope they do. Payback.
Posted by: greyrooster at January 03, 2005 08:28 PM (XioYD)
4
I don't think the Shias have the means to retaliate. It's pretty much, as large mentioned, the US that's doing the fighting for them. As was mentioned at the start of the invasion, until Iraq can support its own effective army, coalition troops will have to stay. And, I think, the only way Iraq can get its own army in decent shape will be when the insurgency is gone. Training them now might produce a few good soldiers, but their lack of experience pretty much makes them sitting ducks.
Posted by: Venom at January 05, 2005 03:47 PM (dbxVM)
5
chupence un culo forros
Posted by: facundo at January 09, 2005 12:33 PM (DFOHf)
6
por que no se van un po a la mierda y en vez de matar irakires matan los bolitas de argentina que estan akl pedo...
Posted by: nicolas at January 09, 2005 12:35 PM (DFOHf)
7
groxas mutilasiones eh!!
Posted by: krillin at January 09, 2005 12:38 PM (DFOHf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Two Beheaded Bodies Found in Baghdad
-
News.com.au
IRAQI police found beheaded two bodies in western Baghdad today along with a note that said they were truck drivers killed because they were working with the US military.
It was not yet known whether the two men were Iraqis or foreigners, police said.
"This is the punishment for all those working with the Americans," read the note left with the bodies, which were both inside bags and dumped on the street.
No group has yet to claim credit for this act, however there have been many terrorist groups inside Iraq who have targeted truck drivers and later beheaded them. While the "reasoning" the terrorists gave sounds familiar to that of Al Qaeda in Iraq and Ansar al-Sunnah, it is important to note the many terrorist groups in Iraq have copied tactics, targets and statements from other groups in a sort of copycat fashion.
Cross-posted at In the Bullpen
Posted by: Chad at
07:55 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 163 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Seems the terrorists are alive and well. Sorry to say their victims aren't.
Why can't we get all these bastards? And where the hell IS Zarqawi and Osama?
Posted by: Laura at January 01, 2005 10:41 AM (ptOpl)
2
They are being supported and hidden by the locals (Sunnis) or they couldn't exist. A good example is the large Bomb they set off in a house, Nobody saw them unloading explosives for a week but somebody called the cops after the fuses were set . . . I say, bring in the Kurds, let them police the Sunni Areas . . Keep the press out . . That shit will come to a screeching halt in about a month!
We cannot do what needs to be done, with our social structure and oversight. This is a way of letting them "settle their differences" without killing all of them. The Kurds will deal with them in a manner the locals understand, and there'll be no "Religious" differences.
If we were to let the Shiites deal with 'em, they'd kill 'em all! Simple as that, and that's what will eventually happen if the Sunnis don't have a voice in the new Government . . Oh, How the Europeans will cry if that happens . . Personally I don't give a shit, as long as it isn't Americans dying in their "Civil War" and right now, We're fighting it for all of the Iraqi's.
Posted by: large at January 01, 2005 11:30 AM (VRK2g)
3
It's a da-- shame we did not have two (2) Marine divisions 20 months ago as the Navy said we needed. Thousands have lost their lives due to incompetent leadership. The war is right. Rummy is wrong. And to make matters worse he refuses to make things right.
Posted by: Rod Stanton at January 01, 2005 03:49 PM (tHUgl)
4
Large has a good point on how do the terrorists place tons of explosives in a highly populated area without anyone seeing. Of course many of us know and have repeated talked about the colusion with the local population. Why do we care about these people? When we have problems with these 3rd rate, silly countries we should go over, kick the shit out of them and come home. Kicking the shit out of them and then hugging them is to no avail. They take it as weakness. If they haven't the courage to stand up to religious fanatical killers they deserve them.
Posted by: greyrooster at January 01, 2005 03:55 PM (VsBCt)
5
Too bad there aren't any tsunamis in Iraq.
Posted by: Laura at January 01, 2005 06:11 PM (ptOpl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Al Qaeda in Iraq Executed Five Iraqi National Guardsmen
-
Reuters
DUBAI (Reuters) - Militants from a group led by al Qaeda ally Abu Musab al-Zarqawi said they had killed five men and warned those who work with the U.S.-backed government they faced the same fate.
Video footage showed five men in civilian clothes lined up and shot repeatedly in the back. It was posted on the Internet Saturday from the Al Qaeda Organization of Holy War in Iraq.
Five men in civilian clothes were found shot dead in Ramadi, capital of Anbar province, Monday. A note said they were policemen killed by guerrilla fighters.
A masked militant on the video Saturday said: "These apostates are ... allies with (Iraqi Prime Minister Iyad) Allawi's apostate government and support the American enemy. They are attacking Muslim homes in Ramadi under the pretext of preventing terrorists from entering Iraq. Anyone who follows them will face the same fate."
"To the families of civil defense forces, the National Guard and the police we tell you to say your final goodbyes to your sons before you send them to us. Our reward to your sons is slaughter," he added.
Iraqi National Guard and Iraqi policemen have been a favorite target of terrorist groups, however Ansar al-Sunnah has been the primary terrorist group targeting such individuals beforehand while Al Qaeda in Iraq seemed to center on foreigners and innocent Iraqis who were in the market areas.
Three roadside bombs were detonated near Iraqi National Guardsmen killing one and injuring six.
Update:
The video of the execution of five Iraqi National Guardsmen can be downloaded here (courtesy of Ogrish).
Hat tip to Hyscience who found the video link and also has some great commentary.
Cross-posted at In the Bullpen
Posted by: Chad at
07:40 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 302 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at January 01, 2005 01:39 PM (D39Vm)
2
I'm confused! Didn't someone request that Venom not reply to so many subjects? Is that a two way street?
Posted by: greyrooster at January 01, 2005 03:30 PM (VsBCt)
3
As you have noticed the Greyrooster is back from 4 wonderful days of fishing in beautiful Costa Rica.
First things to hit my mind. (1) Tidal wave hits Somalia. Wasn't Somalia the country who defiled and dragged the bodies of dead Marines though the streets a few years back? We need to send help to these people quick. NOT!!!!!
(2) Indonesia: Worlds most populous muslim nation. I know they pray for us every night. Mixed feelings here. Any celebrations after 9/11?
Racist that I am. I stopped at a local barber shop in South Mississippi on the way home to check up on the local Klan. (a) They still think I'm a spy. Probably, because I'm from San Francisco. Almost as bad as New York. (b) They're understanding people and willing to give me a chance. (c) Black people no longer have to worry about the KKK. The N word was never brought up. From now on the N word is preceded by the word sand. (d) The reason they wear rags on their heads to keep the camel dung out of the facial orifices during sand storms. Always wondered what they were for. Only in south Mississippi could anyone explain why.
Gotta go. We are having a big bomb fire down on the river tonight.
Posted by: greyrooster at January 01, 2005 04:17 PM (VsBCt)
4
Too bad a tsunami could have hit Iraq..sigh. Would've taken out several Mid East locations, probably Osama too.
Glad to have you back, Roost. How's your son doing?
Posted by: Laura at January 02, 2005 02:12 PM (ptOpl)
5
i will kill all the crusaders
signed al qaeda in england
Posted by: nothin at March 12, 2005 09:08 AM (wy7Vc)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
63kb generated in CPU 0.0234, elapsed 0.1619 seconds.
123 queries taking 0.1482 seconds, 298 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.