August 19, 2004
Why I am Basically Pro-Life
This. That is more than mere
potential life--it is a human being.
Posted by: Rusty at
01:05 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 22 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Only opne post after declaring yourself a "neolibertarian," huh? A neolibertarian prioritizes the willful control of the woman's body (at least until viability or other subjective standard) over the government's ability to mandate her decision.
Or at least, that's what it says right here in my neolibertarian handbook ...
Posted by: Bill from INDC at August 19, 2004 07:46 PM (LrsAD)
2
I said 'basically'. But dude, let's be real for a second. If a fetus is viable after 3 months, what is the argument for being TOTALLy pro-choice. It makes no sense. Speaking of 'subjective', why not just advocate 52nd week abortions like Mrs. Cartman? As a matter of fact, if 'life' is somehow tied to self-awareness than that would be a sensible alternative.
Posted by: RS at August 19, 2004 08:13 PM (JQjhA)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I'm a neolibertarian
Kenneth Silber has an interesting piece over at TCS in which he proposes a new word to describe libertarian leaning conservatives--
fusionists:
Fusionism is the idea, named and developed decades ago by Frank Meyer of National Review, that conservatism and libertarianism share a common agenda. Thus, the fusionist believes that conservatives and libertarians ought to be allies -- and indeed that their respective philosophies are largely or essentially combinable into a coherent body of thought.
John Henke, over at QandO, agrees with the general gist of Silber's article but prefers the term
neolibertarian over the awkward sounding
fusionist.
Might I second the motion for neolibertarian? The term flows better than fusionist, which makes me think of the music of Kenny-G or Chuck Mangione more than any thing else.
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
12:33 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1003 words, total size 7 kb.
1
One of the reason's I can't be a true libertarian (or an anarchist) is because of my theology. Viewing Mankind as flawed and tainted by sin, I view our species as capable of committing far too much meanness towards each other to be left ENTIRELY to our own devices. On the other hand, this is also the reason I am opposed to totalitarianism -- I can't trust our choice of leader enough to give him absolute power. In the middle, I tend to believe we should be protected from each other, but not so much from ourselves. Difficulties in deciding my position on an issue arise when the line between behavior that is only self-harmful and that which has collateral effect on innocent bystanders gets blurred. The Devil is in the details.
Hmmmm..... sounds like a Blog entry.
Posted by: Brian B at August 19, 2004 01:32 PM (OnnW3)
2
Rusty -
Brilliant. Extra-double brilliant.
Yeah, I agree, the Republican party gets under my skin, but the Democratic party should be dragged out into the street and
shot.
Posted by: Bravo Romeo Delta at August 19, 2004 01:53 PM (9X/fX)
Posted by: RS at August 19, 2004 01:54 PM (JQjhA)
4
I gave up on the Libertarian Party when my friends in the local chapter attacked me for supporting school vouchers. In the world as it exists, their position is effectively a defense of the government school monopoly. I understand that in their theory, they are a violation of seperation of school and state, but the perfect is the enemy of the good.
Posted by: triticale at August 19, 2004 04:24 PM (YmQkS)
5
Why can't people talk in plain, normal, everyday speech anymore?
So we all can understand what the hell is being said?
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at August 24, 2004 11:31 PM (t0rjm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 16, 2004
Paul Krugman's Credibility: RIP
Mr. Henke over at
QandO rips Paul Krugman a new one. An incredible
Thou Sayest piece that used Paul Krugman's own words to condemn his extreme punditry. Go
read it.
Posted by: Rusty at
04:03 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 38 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Given how many new ones he's already had ripped, and how big the one O'Reilly ripped him was, did Krugman have any space left to accomodate another?
Posted by: Brian B at August 16, 2004 04:58 PM (OnnW3)
2
Krugman is brilliant. O'Reilly is a jabbering head. Fox Network is the opiate of the masses.
Chuck (0)
Posted by: Chuck Zero at February 25, 2005 09:53 PM (iDiwK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
What's wrong with this headline?
Michael Jackson in face-off with prosecutor at court
Sorry. Back to our regularly scheduled programming.....
Posted by: Rusty at
03:48 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.
1
At least you still have a good sense of humor.
~C
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at August 16, 2004 03:52 PM (t0rjm)
2
What do you mean 'still'?
:-)
Posted by: RS at August 16, 2004 03:53 PM (JQjhA)
3
Well, if Mr. NAMBLA's faux-nose-tip falls off during the meeting, the headline will actually be correct in its prognostication, and THEN who'll look silly?
Posted by: ccwbass at August 16, 2004 03:57 PM (qg4dU)
Posted by: Brian at December 21, 2004 04:17 PM (ss/3N)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Carter endorses Chavez win in Venezuela
You know, when Jimmy Carter speaks I am always reassured.
Seattle Post Intelligencer:
Directing his remarks at opposition figures, Carter called on all Venezuelans to accept the results.
"Now it's the responsibility of all Venezuelans to accept the results and work together for the future," said Carter.
Never mind the strong-arm tactics employed by Chavez to silence his opposition....you know, like
shooting people.
Posted by: Rusty at
01:30 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 73 words, total size 1 kb.
1
or like not allowing Carter's collegues to observe voting and ballot counting. No need to, Chavez won the old Stalinist/Fascist way!
Posted by: Michele at August 17, 2004 10:54 AM (2c9qq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Arab? No man, I'm from East L.A.
Just in case you didn't catch the link from my earlier post, there was a report out in the
Telegraph (UK) that caught my attention (hat tip: whoever it was that sent me the link---oops, forgot, sorry!!):
President Bush has launched a drive to halt illegal immigration across America's porous southern border, amid growing fears that terrorists may be using Mexico as a base camp before heading to Arizona, Texas and California.
A string of alarming incidents has convinced Bush administration officials that lax immigration rules, designed to cope with the huge numbers of illegal entrants from Mexico, have become a significant loophole in the war on terror.
Over the past month, border agents from Arizona and Texas have anonymously reported recent encounters with dozens of Arab men, who have made their way across the 2,000-mile Mexican border.
The good news is it appears we have begun to crackdown on the border. The bad news is that for every illegal caught, another one gets in unnoticed. More in extended entry.
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
01:17 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 883 words, total size 6 kb.
1
This is the main reason I scoff at those who say they're voting for Jorge Bush out of national security concerns. If Bush's priority was security (not reelection) he would have cracked down on this problem two years ago.
Yes, I scoff ...
Posted by: Professor Chaos at August 16, 2004 10:44 PM (PT9Fx)
2
Here is my problem with that statement: you treat this as a dualistic choice--either your for security or against it. I see it as a continuum. More security or less security. We have tightened the borders up since 9/11. Not nearly as much as you and I would like, but still MORE. While always hoping that government will do the best possible job, I think the most we can EXPECT is better.
Posted by: RS at August 17, 2004 08:11 AM (JQjhA)
3
Both the federal government and the southern border state have done a tremendous job at improving immigration. The problem come in with 2 large muslim communities which have been established in the remotest of regions not far from the texas and california borders. They have been converting hundreds of poor mexicans, abandoned by their government. The lure? Financial compensation for those who choose to join their communities by way of employment in the community's various industries and from no-interest loans to small businesses.
What I'm hoping for, perhaps naively, is that someone is following the money trail back, to see where it leads to. Any guesses?
Posted by: Michele at August 17, 2004 11:05 AM (2c9qq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Oops, one last thought
Just a reminder that
Gordon is pretty funny. Now go to bed!!
Posted by: Rusty at
12:07 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 20 words, total size 1 kb.
August 15, 2004
UN Expresses Outrage At Massacre: Sends help in form of condolences
I wish it were a joke. It sounds like a joke. It's not. Remember, this is the same U.N. that John Kerry wished to wait for approval from before invading Iraq. All italics are mine.
VOA:
The U.N. Security Council has strongly condemned the massacre of ethnic Tutsis at a U.N. refugee camp in Burundi. The Council issued a statement during a rare Sunday evening session.
France called the emergency session to express outrage at the massacre, which took place Friday night at a refugee camp not far from Burundi's border with Congo.
More in extended entry.
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
11:02 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 403 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Pathetic beyond words. Pretty soon the term "yellow belly" will be replaced by "blue hat."
Posted by: Jane at August 15, 2004 11:34 PM (b/7hi)
2
And country singers will be writing songs about the 'blue hat of the county' and such.
Posted by: RS at August 16, 2004 12:04 AM (JQjhA)
3
Is the defunct, all words but no action UN which is a joke, do something for a change? or are they just condemnng but not acting on this situation?
~C
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at August 16, 2004 01:47 AM (t0rjm)
4
You post ought to be a full page, glossy four-color ad in the New York Times. The ad should say something like, "What's so wrong with unilateralism?"
Posted by: Gordon at August 16, 2004 08:41 AM (3SUt8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Chavez Recall: 1 Dead, 13 Wounded
Please, please, please be on your way out Mr. Chavez. I know a family from Venezuela. In their opinion the Chavistas are nothing more than Chauvanistas. Bullies who use paramilitary tactics to force their will on the rest of the country. If Chavez survives the recall effort, it will be largely because of his army of Brownshirts in the slums. More in extended entry. (hat tip:
Instapundit)
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
10:03 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 698 words, total size 4 kb.
1
... the Chavistas are nothing more than Chauvanistas. Bullies who use paramilitary tactics to force their will on the rest of the country. If Chavez survives the recall effort, it will be largely because of his army of Brownshirts in the slums.
Yeah, just like the Bush administration.
Posted by: Professor Chaos at August 15, 2004 10:10 PM (9lxbA)
2
Man, just replace "Chavez" with "Bush" and "Venezuela" with "America" and you've got an Eric Alterman post!
Posted by: Johnny Walker Red at August 15, 2004 10:11 PM (N59dJ)
3
Sweet, do you think the NY Times will syndicate a fiction character who blogs?
Posted by: RS at August 15, 2004 10:13 PM (JQjhA)
4
Ever heard of Jayson Blair?
Posted by: Johnny Walker Red at August 15, 2004 10:25 PM (N59dJ)
5
USA polocy is to kill or overthrow all popular
president or prime minister . We don't like US
president George W.Bush.
May God bless the president of Venezuela.
I thank Mr.Johnny Walker Red
Dr. Shitu
Posted by: Dr.Shitu at March 06, 2005 08:43 AM (k9pvv)
6
Gee, Dr. Shitu, your speech sounds quite coherent and impressive, especially the bit about US policy.
You make Europe and Japan sound like tyranny.
Get a grip on your words.
Posted by: Piotr at April 04, 2005 12:01 PM (b9bnR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Kerry/O'Neill Debate on C-Span
C-Span ran a 1971 episode of
The Dick Cavett Show earlier this evening. The show featured a young John O'Neill, looking like a clean-cut young man fresh out of the military, debating a young John Kerry, looking just a little too rich to pull off the long hair. C-Span ran the show several months ago and I caught most of it. Tonight, I only caught about five minutes. What struck me most about the show, this evening, was not so much John Kerry's smug patrician tone as he spoke to the obviously much less-educated John O'Neill, but rather Kerry's pronunciation. I'm not sure exactly how to describe what he sounded like. But think
Hanoi Jane meets Thurston Howell III. Yeah, something like that.
If the Bush campaign could use that footage in an advertisement......well, think landslide. Kerry does not come off as anything but an arrogant prick. That would be before the "W" campaign ran any of the slander and anti-war BS. Include that, and Kerry might just carry MA and NY. Maybe.
PS-Look at pic in extended entry....now imagine the voice I described....that is John Kerry.
(Salute: Slant Point)
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
09:38 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 198 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I saw the replay twice already (cspan addict) and I agree: Kerry is revolting and clips in a TV ad would be the tipping point. When I saw some of it tonight, it just renewed by respect for O'Neill.
Posted by: Jane at August 15, 2004 11:39 PM (b/7hi)
2
WHERE CAN I PURCHASE THIS SHOW Kerry O'Neill Debate ? anyone have it saved cspan does not have it anymore online
Posted by: sgtdrake at October 30, 2004 08:24 AM (wl7mn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Swiftboat Meme Intercepted from Politburo
Most of you know I am guest blogging over at the
Politburo Diktat while the Commissar is off to the gulag. Checking the Commissar's daily e-mail, I came across the following meme. Proceed at your own caution. Posession of this meme is said to carry an instant death sentence.
__________________________________________________________________
XXXXXXXXXX Top Secret XXXXXXXXXX
From: Atrios, MiniTru Undersecretary for Propaganda
To: Commissar, Washington Post, NY Times, CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS, Reuters, AP Affiliates Listserv
CC: Kos, Drum, Marshall, Jesse Taylor, Oliver Willis,
BCC: AS (aka, The Mole), DA (aka, The Costa Rican), JG (aka, The Moderate)
RE: New Kerry Campaign Photo.
Comrades,
Fraternal Socialist Greetings! It has come to MiniTru's attention that counter-revolutionary elements have been distributing unapproved memes on the life and times of a high placed sleeper agent (codename: Manchurian Candidate). While MiniTru's crack legal team is doing all it can to stop this reactionary propaganda and other lies about Manchurian Candidate's efforts to further worldwide peace, we believe more can be done on this front.
Therefore, with the assistance of tavarisch emigre, Mini Tru has produced the following meme. It should be distributed immediately:
PS-The following is an example of Trotskyite propaganda. All copies are to be destroyed immediately.
(via reactionaries at Iowa Pres Watch)
Please include appropriate support in weekly editorials discrediting reactionary Swift Boat Veterans. These veterans are Party approved, are more representative of veterans in general, and may be used for guest editorials.
Your fraternal socialist brother,
Atrios, MiniTru Undersecretary for Propaganda
XXX Destroy all copies of this meme after receipt XXX
__________________________________________________________________
Clenched fist salute: emigre. He designed the meme. In spite of his tireless efforts at producing Party approved photo, he is right-wing reactionary. Do not inspekt his site!
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
08:44 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 306 words, total size 5 kb.
August 14, 2004
Typhoon Rananim vs. Hurricane Charlie
Typhoon Rananim: 115 killed; 16 missing; 1,800 injuries; 40,000 buildings down
Hurricane Charlie: 'significant' loss of life=one mobile home park destroyed: $15 billion in property damage.
The difference? Wealth via capitalism.
Posted by: Rusty at
09:56 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 41 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Rusty,considering how dangerous the world is today,I've decided I need Dale-Tech Security.How do I sign up,and how much is it?
Don't make me sic William Fontaine DeLateure D'auterrive on you.
www.swornenemy.org
Posted by: mike at August 15, 2004 02:42 AM (g/f6A)
2
That's not fair either Rusty, our country has STRIVED to be the best. We are a very privileged people and WE made it that way. When I read what the our soldiers write as they go about their sometimes and other times very dangerous lives in Iraq and Afghanistan and how the people have absolutely NO dignity, throw trash out side of the house and it just piles on up and they smell and the air smells and their buildings smell, these people are NOT doing a damn thing to help themselves!!!
It's like that ALL over the world. They may be hundreds of thousands of years old, we're not but look how far we've come!! They know they get typhoons, they should be building things if anything and have preparedness ready to go in plenty of time to stop that kind of death and damage and injuries. And the reason it keeps happening is because THEY have not made any changes to make LIFE for THEM better!! So you can't compare the two, I'm sorry, I do not agree with that.
~C
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at August 15, 2004 03:39 PM (t0rjm)
3
Mike. Shhhhhhhhhhh. Loose lips sink ships.
C. I think of it differently. Chinese culture has everything needed for a country to thrive--work ethic, delayed gratification, saving, education ethic. So why is it only in the last 15 years or so that China's economy has taken off like a rocket? It's not the people, it's the system they live under. Our system of liberty plus our culture has given us the material goods we have. China has the culture, but only as the system changes will they reach first world status.
Posted by: RS at August 15, 2004 06:23 PM (JQjhA)
4
That's what I said, Rusty.
~C
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at August 16, 2004 01:59 AM (t0rjm)
Posted by: EmptyHed at September 09, 2004 03:25 AM (91USc)
6
im sorry guys but this is auful. look we need to set up an organisiation a group which people can give money to. we won't spedn this on ourselfs it will all go to help stop these volcanoes and to people who have been injured anoes and so and so forth. If anyone would like to join this community which i have just explained/sugested i would be grateful to be the leader. everyone will be as important as each other and we will each listen and share everyones idea's and hopefully and sucessfully carry them out . so if you'd like to join and help the world pls email me at lottebloom92@hotmail.com and a big or small community we will sort this out. so pls email me and share your comments and be part of this group. dont forget! bye!!
Posted by: lotte bloom at November 30, 2004 10:58 AM (kNCT7)
7
your all wrong.
ill blow em out of the sea.
Posted by: president bush at March 08, 2005 09:35 PM (wyA3u)
8
Have you realized how stupid you are after looking at the New Orelands afterwards?
Posted by: bob at September 02, 2005 11:59 AM (du/N9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
160 killed in UN refugee camp
John Kerry wanted to wait for
THIS UN's approval? Maybe he meant some other UN. In related
news: Rwandan's Say They Will Protect Sudanese Villagers.
Right. Stories in extended entry.
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
09:37 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 645 words, total size 4 kb.
1
"Rwanda says the world's slow response to the Darfur crisis" Wait a minute here; the world has NOT been slow in their response to this crisis. THEIR GOVERNMENT said this was NOT happening, that they did not want the UN in there, they wanted NO US Forces in there, they did not need help, there was no genocide going on..bullshit!! Finally they are accepting BLACK footsoldiers from the African Nations. Remember it's the whites in Sudan that are killing the black people of Darfur, many of them have gone over the border to Chad. And they DARE say WE and the rest of the WORLD was slow to respond?? They won't let anyone in!!!! Fact is fact! I've been watching this for awhile now and those reports are bullshit!
~C
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at August 14, 2004 10:42 AM (t0rjm)
2
Dude, you're knockin' 'em outta the park lately.
Posted by: Johnny Walker Red at August 14, 2004 12:25 PM (TLLNn)
3
The UNITED NATIONS is a waste of everyone's time; they are not doing their job and fulfilling their purpose for which it was made to do. We should break it apart and get people who really give a damn!!
~C
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at August 15, 2004 03:42 PM (t0rjm)
4
Johnny, thanks man.
C. Amen...I might add, though, that the UN can be useful to our interests at times. I don't think we necessarily ought to get out, just not put any faith in it for solving many international problems.
Posted by: RS at August 15, 2004 07:08 PM (JQjhA)
5
I would blame the "Arab" government of Sudan, but not too much. Polical and economic disparities between the "Arabs" and the "Africans" are the result of British colonial policies that were meant to divide the nation to prevent a unified revolt and employ the "Arabs" in keeping the "Africans" 'under control.' There is not that much of a phisical difference between the "Arabs" of Sudan and the "Africans." The UN is a tool in the hands of the "Western world" that allows them to retain their resources and dignity while getting somebody else to clean up their mess!
Posted by: Cleat at December 14, 2004 03:06 AM (XPlsW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Hostage List
Via
Slant Point I found this
Guardian Article attempting to list hostages held or killed in Iraq, something I have been trying to do for awhile. Unfortunately for them, the list of hostages killed is incomplete. For a complete list, see my
post on the subject. If I am missing any names, please e-mail me or drop a comment.
Posted by: Rusty at
09:18 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 63 words, total size 1 kb.
Oppressed Iraqis Show Hate of Great Satan
"The new Iraq looks just like the old one....We replaced one brutal dictatorial regime with another brutal dictatorial regime."--
kos.
Proof below.
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
08:45 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 41 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I don't get it.
But then I don't believe Kos have ever made a reasonable statement worth anything!
~C
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at August 14, 2004 10:55 AM (t0rjm)
2
"And then when we're done here, we're going to take your oppressive Yankee asses out for drinks and dancing! Take that, you imperialist dogs!"
Posted by: Brian B at August 14, 2004 12:06 PM (PuHU/)
3
and we care what Kos thinks why?
his positions and point of view are proof he is in his own little world denying the greater good for the attention that comes from is friends on the left.
Screw 'em.
Posted by: jcrue at August 14, 2004 02:30 PM (CGqKc)
4
The reason Kos pisses me off so much is he get's close to 100k hits a day. That makes him dangerous because so many people take him seriously.
Posted by: RS at August 15, 2004 06:57 PM (JQjhA)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 13, 2004
It's All About the Hidden Hands, Man
I think Noam Chomsky would say something like, "Find out who benefits, and you'll find the motivation."
So, who is behind QandO's Jon Henke? I bet it's GE's War Making Division.
Posted by: Rusty at
04:47 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 45 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I can no longer sit back and allow liberal infiltration, liberal indoctrination, liberal subversion and the international liberal conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.
....I have my orders.
Posted by: Jon Henke at August 13, 2004 06:09 PM (BB4w6)
2
I agree. That's why I only drink rainwater or distilled water, and pure grain alcohol.
Posted by: Dale Franks at August 13, 2004 09:37 PM (aMUW/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 12, 2004
Kerry Half Way Across Country
5 miles, 50 miles....what does it matter?
Kerry now claims he was not in Cambodia, but near it on Christmas. Near being 50 miles away. Pretty close if you're in Texas, but not in Vienam. Sa Dec, where Kerry was stationed, is LITERALLY halfway across the country!! (Source)
Captain Ed has the complete story.
QuandO also spanking the Kerry campaign.
UPDATE: The Instapundit ripped off my idea...but has a better map.
Posted by: Rusty at
10:48 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 81 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The story is seared, seared into my memory.
Posted by: Jane at August 12, 2004 11:21 PM (PcgQk)
2
In my memory, this story is seared, then roasted and served in a red wine sauce and garnished with a sprig of rosemary.
Posted by: Brian B at August 13, 2004 11:07 AM (OnnW3)
3
That map reads like a seating chart for an Alexandria (VA) public school.
Posted by: Professor Chaos at August 13, 2004 11:11 AM (ZlQcy)
4
I must confirm, based on my own personal experiences day to day in that hostile environment, with incidents too numerous to count and with recollections as fresh as if they were yesterday -- in fact, it WAS yesterday -- that 50 miles within Texas is "close".
Hauled the kids up from Lancaster to Flower Mound for a playdate to swim with some friends of theirs. Didn't think a moment about the dangers, the expense, the weather. I had a mission, and I accomplished it.
Posted by: Pouncer at August 13, 2004 11:25 AM (wSBsc)
5
Heck, anywhere in the US east of the Mississippi, 50 miles is nothing!
Posted by: Brian B at August 13, 2004 12:14 PM (OnnW3)
Posted by: Brian B at August 13, 2004 01:06 PM (OnnW3)
7
A trip around the DC beltway is 66 miles. Rockville seems halfway across the world from Alexandria.
Posted by: Dick at August 13, 2004 03:10 PM (xNyES)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
ORTHODOX Christmas in Cambodia
Did you know that the Orthodox church celebrates Christmas two weeks after we do? That's what John Kerry meant by Christmas in Cambodia.....Orthodox Christmas
Drudge flash: Kerry has turned to author Brinkley for a "modification" after it was exposed that Kerry was not in Cambodia during Christmas of 1968, as he once claimed from the Senate floor.
The Brinkley piece for the NEW YORKER will now say that Kerry was not in Cambodia during Christmas, but rather in January, publishing sources tell DRUDGE.
This gets stranger and stranger.
Capatain Ed has the lowdown on it.
Posted by: Rusty at
10:09 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 103 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Actually Christmas in the same in the Orthodox Church...it's Easter that's messed up.
Unless we're talking two different Orthodox Churches. Or living in parallel universes. Or something.
Forgive me. I'm still in shock that we spawned a blogchild together and I don't remember that special moment. (Honestly, I've never blacked out like that before.)
Posted by: Da Goddess at August 13, 2004 11:30 AM (FZwoG)
2
The original post is correct. The western, or Roman, christian churches celebrate christmas on 25 december. The eastern, or Orthodox, christian churches celebrate christmas on 7 January. Easter is the same date for all christian churches.
It may be that senator Kerry was with a group of orthodox christian Cambodians for christmas 1968 (january 1969). This is not likely as less than 1% of cambodians are western christians, and there are no orthodox churches in the country. However, it is possible.
It is not likely they would celebrate loudly during a covert operation in a hostile country.
A lucid and interesting discussion of the julian and gregorian calendars can be found at www.goarc.org/en/ourfaith/
Posted by:
Bob
Posted by: bob at August 13, 2004 05:12 PM (G2MZm)
3
thanks for clearing that up! I've been having a screaming match with her via e-mail all day long!!
Posted by: RS at August 13, 2004 05:14 PM (JQjhA)
4
You've been having a screaming match with who??
Certainly not me.
Now, the difference for us - regarding Christmas - is that my Orthodox church celebrates December 25.
Easter? I gave up trying to explain it to people. I always offer to work Western Eastern and ask for Orthodox off and get it.
Posted by: Da Goddess at August 13, 2004 06:32 PM (FZwoG)
5
Screaming? I meant 'lovers quarrel'. You must go to one of those liberal Unitarian Orthodox churches.......
Last time I checked, the OFFICIAL stance of Orthodoxy was that Christmas is in January. It may be that most Orthodox Christians celebrate on Dec. 25, but theologically Orthodoxy goes by the Julian Calendar.
On this point I'm pretty positive. You can check this article if you don't believe me: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/1105210.stm
Posted by: RS at August 14, 2004 08:14 AM (JQjhA)
6
I'm Orthodox and I will explain.
Pascha (Greek for Passover) is what the Orthodox call the Feast of the Ressurection, known as Easter in the Occident. It varies from year to year because we date it using the Julian Calendar. All Orthodox jurisdictions do this! Every four years it is the same as the western Gregorian Easter, such as 2003 when all christians celebrated it on April 11, yet in 2004 the Orthodox will celebrate it on May first while the West will celebrate it March 27.
The Orthodox Church is split on the calendar issue for non-Paschal feasts, such as Christmas. In 1920 Patriarch Meletios Metazaxis of Constantinople, whose rumored to have been a freemason, un-canonically changed to the Gregorian calendar and many jurisdictions followed suit after several years, including the jurisdiction I belong to. However the majority of Orthodox Christians who belong to jurisdictions such as Russia, the largest by far, Serbia, Jerusalem, Bulgaria, and others maintained using the Julian Calendar for all feasts. Some local parishes and diocese broke off from their jurisdiction when it accepted the Gregorian Calendar and are known as Old Caledarist.
By the way, this is not a 'theological' issue, in fact such disputes are commong in church history. Personally I think my jurisdiction should return to celebrating Christmas according to the Julian calendar, but whether we do or not does not matter because no one knows when Our Lord Jesus Christ was really born!
The reason why this is a big deal to Orthodox is Unity! Many like me believe that Patriarch Metazaxis was trying to unify the Orthodox with the West and that's why he changed the calendar.
He instead should have been concerned about the Unity of the One True Orthodox Church.
With regard to Cambodia I cannot help you, maybe it was an Orthodox mission? I don't know.
If you're still confused go here:
www.orthodoxinfo .com
Asking your prayers
Augustine
Posted by: Christian at December 04, 2004 05:43 PM (Dk7wS)
7
Greek Orthodox Christmas = Dec 25th
Every other Orthodox chruch = Jan 7th
Orthodox Easter is celebrated using the old calender and can't come before Jewish Passover so the Orthodox Easter is on the same day as the western Easter every few years, but usualy is after.
Posted by: Anastasi at January 03, 2005 05:33 PM (q4UOm)
8
how do they celebrate christmas?
Posted by: bob at April 16, 2005 05:04 AM (tLojP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
War Looms Between Russia and Georgia
From
Xinhuanet:
Three people have been killed and several others wounded in an overnight shelling in Georgia's separatist region of South Ossetia.
Irina Gagloyeva, head of the South Ossetian Information and Press Committee, says Tskhinvali, the capital of Ossetia, and surrounding Ossetian villages were heavily shelled by Georgians the previous night.
Earlier on Thursday, the leadership of self-run South Ossetia issued an ultimatum to Georgia, demanding that it stop the shelling at Tskhinvali within 30 minutes, or they would eliminate the armed forces that had filtered into the conflict zone between South Ossetia and Georgia.
Tension has been high between Tbilisi and South Ossetia since late May over the status of the breakaway region.
Remember this word:
Ossetia. Ossetia is a province of Georgia (the country,
dumbass) that is ethnically Russian--a result of Tsarist Russian Imperialism, Stalin's Russification policy (ironic, because Stalin was a Georgian not a Russian), and borders drawn under the Soviets. Ossetia has been functionally free from Georgia since the collapse of the USSR.
I went to college in Russia for a year and can tell you that there is a deep feeling of solidarity between citizens of Russia and Russians living abroad. Russian nationalism is not based entirely on ethnicity. Rather, to be truly Russian you must be Orthodox as well. One can be ethnically Russian, and still be considered an outsider. This is why Jews never really fit in. In fact, Russians feel a much deeper solidarity with Serbs, who are also Slavic and Orthodox, than they do with Jews, Gypsies, and Asians living in Russia proper. This explains why Russia would not allow approval of a UN resolution authorizing force in Yugoslavia. To Russians, an attack on Yugoslavia is nearly an attack on the motherland itself.
So, the fact that a tense ceasefire has been broken in Ossetia's civil war with Georgia, means that a broader regional war could break out. Georgia also has had long standing border disputes with it's other neighbors. This is bad.
More info below.
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
09:39 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1096 words, total size 7 kb.
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at August 12, 2004 10:50 PM (t0rjm)
2
Wait, I know you said Georgia the country, but when did we make Georgia a country? Was this some kind of 40 acres deal with Spike Lee? Sounds like some kind of Mr. Garrison plan to me.
Posted by: Professor Chaos at August 12, 2004 11:12 PM (i8pVB)
3
Quite informative post. Thank you.
Posted by: Jane at August 12, 2004 11:28 PM (PcgQk)
4
I'd say this is more the work of Mr. Hat than Mr. Garrison.
Posted by: RS at August 13, 2004 10:02 AM (JQjhA)
5
Friggin' Jimmie Carter . . !
Posted by: ccwbass at August 13, 2004 10:28 AM (qg4dU)
Posted by: Vlad at September 02, 2004 09:57 AM (Ce0SV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Not All the Way Gay
I just had to get
that out. (apologies to Silent Bob)
Posted by: Rusty at
04:23 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I took the liberty of compiling a list of things that, in hindsight, should have clued everyone in on how "all the way" gay the Gov was. Since you are an expert in this area, let me know if I forgot anything.
Posted by: Senator PhilABuster at August 12, 2004 04:35 PM (UHfuz)
2
So Rusty,
to be a bit smarmy, remember your friend who was so upset about Alexander down in Louisiana? When can we expect him to blog his outrage that McGreevy won't step down till after the election?
Posted by: Brian B at August 12, 2004 07:12 PM (OnnW3)
3
When? Right about _____________________.
That's when.
Also, I don't think they understood the gist of what I was saying. Alexander's ad was a perfect example of politicians using symbols that could be interpreted in multiply ways. He's a great politician, but I don't like politicians much.
Posted by: RS at August 12, 2004 08:45 PM (JQjhA)
4
Didn't Twain say something about a Statesman being a dead politician? Or was it WR?
Posted by: Brian B at August 13, 2004 11:10 AM (OnnW3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
83kb generated in CPU 0.0448, elapsed 0.2604 seconds.
133 queries taking 0.2332 seconds, 353 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.