What does it even mean to be 'stingy' with the Constitution? That's what Ted Kennedy is hoping to ask John Roberts at his confirmation hearings. Tom at Scared Monkeys has
.
Is that kind of like, "Hey John Roberts, stop being so 'stingy' with the Constitution and pass it around on the left hand side"?
Man, that Constitution is giving me the munchies. Big time.
1
I've never heard anything so stupid as someone being accused of bogarting the Constitution, but given the rye-fueled source, it's not really a shock. I can only imagine the ridiculous crap Teddy-boy has said to cops every time he gets pulled over and is found to be driving with no pants on.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 12, 2005 07:04 PM (0yYS2)
2
Hey, stop being stingy with those DUIs!
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at September 12, 2005 07:35 PM (JQjhA)
3
stop being stingy with those female corpses in vehicles driven by drunk idiots.
Posted by: Henry at September 12, 2005 07:40 PM (NdKxH)
4
This is comming from one of this nations spoiled rich brats who wants gun control and gun bans while surrounded by his armed body guards what a jackass chapaquedic ted is
Posted by: sandpiper at September 12, 2005 08:09 PM (AFJdY)
5
Stingy with the Constitution means Democrats don't get to invent phony "rights" on a whim or whenever they pull some stupid idea right out of their ass.
Posted by: Carlos at September 13, 2005 12:12 AM (8e/V4)
6
People like Kennedy and Schumer and Pelosi think it's okay to legislate from the bench. Even when decisions like the Kelo case come down they don't get it. Pelosi compared Supreme Court decisions to decisions God makes. Notice how whenever a really big one like Kelo vs New London comes down, states have to scramble to enact new legislation to protect their citizens' interests? No one in their right mind would have said, "Gee, I'm pretty sure our founding fathers would have wanted it this way." And they still support their liberal judges. In fact, they want more. If we want a bunch of liberal judges, then what do we need them for at all?
Posted by: Oyster at September 13, 2005 05:42 AM (YudAC)
7
Dangit, IM, I wanted to be the first to say "bogart." Here's hoping that we're not the last.
Few things more ironic than a Kennedy excoriating someone else for being stingy. Too bad those Mass investigators were stingy with the law back in '69.
Posted by: tee bee at September 13, 2005 10:15 AM (q1JHF)
8
"Too bad those Mass investigators were stingy with the law back in '69."
It was because old Joe Kennedy wasn't stingy with his bootlegging fortune, and bought the cops off. The entire Kennedy family is scum and should be given the Romanov treatment, since they think of themselves as royalty.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 15, 2005 12:34 PM (0yYS2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment