March 18, 2005

US Revokes Indian Officials Visa After Muslim Objections

The State Department has revoked the visa of a leader of one of India's province's, citing his role in the massacre of Muslims in Gujarat. New Kerela:

In a major embarrassment to the Chief Minister of Gujarat, Narendra Modi, the United States on Friday revoked the visa to him in wake of the allegations of ignoring widespread anti-Muslim killings in 2002 in Gujarat.

About 1,000 people, mostly Muslims, were hacked, burned or beaten to death in the state, after 59 Hindu kar sevaks died in the S-6 coach of Sabarmati Express, because of fire breaking up.

Modi has denied accusations that he deliberately did nothing to stop the killing of Muslims during the riots in early 2002, and said police took firm action.

Witnesses and survivors said police did nothing to stop Hindu mobs attacking Muslims and in some cases herded victims into the hands of their killers. Human rights groups put the death toll as high as 2,500....

The US decision came after some Muslim and liberal groups campaigned in the United States against the planned visit and petitioned the State Department to revoke his visa on the ground that he used his position in government to violate religious freedom.

India had this response:
The Indian Foreign Ministry called in the U.S. deputy chief of mission in New Delhi on Friday for consultations.

"This action on the part of the U.S. embassy is uncalled for and displays lack of courtesy and sensitivity towards a constitutionally elected chief minister of a state of India," the ministry said in a statement.

"The reasons that have been advanced are entirely unacceptable," BJP leader Yashwant Sinha, a former finance and foreign minister, told reporters.
Modi, known for his fiery nationalist rhetoric, lashed out at the United States.

"This decision of the American government is an insult to the Indian constitution. It is their way of casting aspersions on the sovereignty of India," Modi told a news conference in Ahmedabad, Gujarat's main city.

Before you go crying dhimmi, New Kerela also reports this Indian News Service piece of what seems pretty relevant information:
Almost two years before the US denied Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi a visa, a State Department report on global human rights had held him responsible for the 2002 sectarian violence in his state.

The 2003 edition of Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, prepared annually by the US Department of State, had found Modi guilty of fuelling violence that it claimed had resulted in the deaths of "an estimated 2,000 Muslims".

It was on the basis of this report that the US invoked against Modi a law that makes any foreign government official guilty of serious violations of religious freedom ineligible for a visa.

Citing allegations by civil society groups, the US report had said the Gujarat police and government did little to stop the violence promptly and at times even encouraged or assisted Hindu fundamentalists in perpetrating violent acts.

"Human rights activists reported that the Gujarat police received specific instructions not to take action to prevent a possible violent reaction to the Feb 27 attack by Muslims on a train in Godhra," the report said.

"These observers asserted that Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi personally told Ahmedabad police officials on Feb 27 to allow Hindus two days to react 'peacefully' to the Godhra incident.

"The police reportedly told Muslim victims, 'We don't have orders to help you'," it said.

The US report also quoted extensively from the findings of India's National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) to substantiate its charges against Modi.

"The NHRC held the Gujarat government responsible for the riots and accused it of a complicity that was tacit if not explicit," the US report said.

Posted by: Rusty at 08:27 AM | Comments (13) | Add Comment
Post contains 631 words, total size 4 kb.

1 And Moslems have killed Hindus. Are we going to revoke Muslim visas now as well if the Hindus lobby our government?

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at March 18, 2005 08:35 AM (x+5JB)

2 How come the US government does nothing at all when Muslims kill "Infidels" (any non-Moslem must die!)??? Duh!

Posted by: Lil Hawaii at March 18, 2005 11:15 AM (F3aKm)

3 And now the United States starts acting like Europe. Giving in to the muslim, LIBERAL cry babies.

Posted by: greyrooster at March 19, 2005 08:57 AM (CBNGy)

4 WTF, there is no proof that he was directly involved in the violence. We cannot deny him a visa simply because he was the leader of the area where the violence occurred. It would be the same as if India started denying our citizens visas because of some of the sh*t that happened at Abu Grahib prison.

Posted by: Matt at March 19, 2005 12:36 PM (veh/v)

5 If you do some research on the story, you will discover that the riots (in which many muslims were killed) were a reaction to a fire that some rogue muslims started on a train carrying hindu pilgrims. Geee... is there anywhere in the world where these muslims aren't causing trouble? It's an internal India affair. Why are we trying to make political statements by issuing/denying visas???

Posted by: mermaid at March 19, 2005 12:43 PM (WkS42)

6 Good point

Posted by: greyrooster at March 19, 2005 04:56 PM (CBNGy)

7 supposedly some "rogue muslims" started this right? wht the hell does that have to do with this at all? are you trying to say that just because muslims started it, modi had the right to ignore the pleas of innocent muslims? The United states should be very proud of this desicion. I applaud them. We dont need any terrorists like modi in this country.

Posted by: ams at March 22, 2005 11:19 PM (wTj5e)

8 "How come the US government does nothing at all when Muslims kill "Infidels" (any non-Moslem must die!)??? Duh" 1. it was terrorists 2. do you get the news, iraq and afghanistan ring a bell? 3. and lets see if any of you support saddam hussein getting a visa to america

Posted by: ams at March 22, 2005 11:23 PM (wTj5e)

9 "And Moslems have killed Hindus. Are we going to revoke Muslim visas now as well if the Hindus lobby our government?" yes, if a muslim leader lets muslims kill innocent hindus, then that leader should have his visa revoked

Posted by: ams at March 22, 2005 11:24 PM (wTj5e)

10 "WTF, there is no proof that he was directly involved in the violence. We cannot deny him a visa simply because he was the leader of the area where the violence occurred. It would be the same as if India started denying our citizens visas because of some of the sh*t that happened at Abu Grahib prison." i guess police officers testifying that they had orders NOT to help muslims and orders NOT to stop hindus arent proof enough. I guess this guy modi is as innocent as hitler. since hitler himself never killed jews, he just got others to do it.

Posted by: ams at March 22, 2005 11:26 PM (wTj5e)

11 AMS owned the Modi-lovers... I lived in India at the time... Modi was guilty as hell... I hope he tries to visit England instead...

Posted by: Defkhan1 at March 27, 2005 11:21 PM (n+Scz)

12 I find it hard to believe that anyone can make excuses for such an action, let alone justify the killings, rapes, burning of thousands Muslims in gujarat. The allegation that Muslims have killed Hindus, what exactly does that mean? Are you referring to Pakistan-India war, or Kashmir Indepenedence movement? Name one incident in India where Muslims rioted and killed Hindus by the thousands like Hindutvas did in Gujarat. It seems that animosity towards Muslims blinds some of you. There is even a baseless justification about some muslim starting it, that is ridiculous. The fact is the police forces did nothing to stop the genocide and ethnic cleansing, and even encouraged it. What we must also remember is the inhumane treatment of other minorities in India. Christians, Sikhs, and Dalits have also been the target of communal violence similar to that of the Gujurat massacres. Anyone who supports such an action should not even be allowed to call themselves human.

Posted by: Ammar at August 02, 2005 10:25 AM (6VPQh)

13 Ammar, Yes muslims didnt do riots caz they cant with less strenghth.Instead they planted bombs in bombay,dont u know that?when writing something read the history and then write.Why do the muslims cleansed 4,50,000 hindus from kashmir?What does kafir means?wat does infidels means?does christianity or buddisim or hinduism or jews or any religion asks to kill their non belivers?First there is something wrong in Islam or something wrong u guys intrepeted.If we change or understand that all problems will solve.Say a place where thers peace when muslims are there. Inidans or Hindus arent enemies of any religion nor we convert other people to our religion.Unless ur born nobody can become a hindu.It has historys and civilizations beyond the west.Nalanda is the first university in the world which has science n technology before 2000 years.Hindus hv ethics of war but now to protect ourself we are forced to take swords which we dont like. I am not a fanatic but if u study indias history ull know. Reagards, Royal Hindu

Posted by: royalhindu at August 17, 2005 02:34 PM (o6Vsl)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
25kb generated in CPU 0.7275, elapsed 0.8276 seconds.
118 queries taking 0.8158 seconds, 249 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.