February 16, 2006

Only 325,000 Names on U.S. Suspected Terror List

The MSM is spinning the fact that the U.S. has placed over 325,000 names on the suspected terrorist list as an affront to civil liberties. However, because many of the names are simple variations of spelling, the actual list is closer to 200,000. And U.S. Citizens comprise "only a very, very small fraction" of that number.

So, you're going to tell me that there are only 200,000 potential terrorists in the world identified by the NSA's National Counterterrorism Center? In Britain alone 37% of Muslims agreed that Jews in the U.K. are "legitimate targets as part of the struggle for justice in the Middle East."

50,000 people in Pakistan rallied to suppress free speech in the world today. 3,000 Muslims in the Philippines were at a rally in which cartoon blasphemers were beheaded in effigy today. And you're telling me that 200,000 is a large number? Are you people out of your effing minds!?!?

It's simply amazing the depths of the denial going on in the world about the nature of Islam and the gravity of the threat it poses to Western liberalism. Alleged 'civil liberty' groups express outrage at this number as if there is no relationship between between Islam and terrorism.

For instance:

Timothy Sparapani, an expert on privacy rights at the American Civil Liberties Union, said the ACLU's response was one of incredulity, and alarm that many people are likely to be on the list by mistake, with serious impact on their lives and few, if any, means of getting themselves off it.
Okay, so the ACLU is 'incredulous' and 'alarmed' that some Muslims might be inconvenienced by the fact that they are being watched. Personally, I'd like to express my incredulity and alarm that so many Muslims support terrorism, the murdering of Jews, and the fascism that is Islamic law!

It's true, as Mr. Sparapani notes, that there probably needs to be a better vetting process so that innocent Muslims can be taken off the list quicker, but the solution to that problem is in increasing the NSA budget by leaps and bounds. I wonder how the ACLU would react should some one propose to double the NSA budget? Let me predict that they would be 'incredulous' and 'alarmed' at the potential impact on civil liberties.

While the list is problematic and should cause us some concern, 'Outrage', another word used by the ACLU, should be saved for those who support jihad and terrorism, not directed at those trying to prevent another 9/11.

More over-reaction:

LA Times: Names on U.S. Terror List Quadruple

San Francisco Chronicle: Roster of alleged terrorists swells to 325,000 names

The Standard: Fears over US terrorism list

Al Jazeera.com: 325,000 names on US “terror” list - Report (quote marks in original)

Posted by: Rusty at 09:32 AM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 473 words, total size 4 kb.

1 Ya gotta love a lib/left story that has absolutely positively no legs whats-so-ever! I'm shocked! I'm shocked I tell ya! The Govt actually complies lists of suspected foreign national terrorists in foreign countries! Oh the horror!

Posted by: hondo at February 16, 2006 09:50 AM (fyKFC)

2 325,000-The number of Americans killed when one of these terrorist groups pops off a nuclear device in a major city. That is the number I'm worried about, not how many terrorists the NSA has on a list. It's much better to err or the side of too many rather than not enough.

Posted by: jesusland joe at February 16, 2006 10:03 AM (rUyw4)

3 wow that is a whole lot of names. I didn't even realize that there that many different names. Do you think that you get placed on this list for advocating killing Americans? like hanging them ?

Posted by: john ryan at February 16, 2006 10:32 AM (TcoRJ)

4 Only if you want to hang them for, you know, blasphemy as opposed to convicting some one of murder and then hanging them.

Posted by: Rusty at February 16, 2006 11:27 AM (JQjhA)

5 OK, now the FISA Court should get to work and issue those easily-obtainable warrents so that the NSA can listen in on their phone calls. Should have them all issued by...2010, maybe.

Posted by: Fred Fry at February 16, 2006 11:39 AM (JXdhy)

6 I hope the next terror bomb hits the ACLU's headquarters. Highly unlikely since the terrorists and the ACLU are the same people, but a nice thought!

Posted by: Andy at February 16, 2006 11:44 AM (tMU4W)

7 325,000 out of a world population of some 6.5 billion people... How dare we!!!

Posted by: Keith, Indy at February 16, 2006 12:36 PM (pVUxX)

8 That would be about 1% of the US population or about 5/1000 ths of 1% of the world population of the world. Not bad. Lets "zero-in" on the bad guys and leave us law abiding citizens alone.

Posted by: Chief RZ at February 16, 2006 02:17 PM (iNTGz)

9 Actually it is 00.01% or America's population. Or 99.99& or us are not on it. But the real point is that the America hating MSM/DNC would fault the # no matter what it was; 35,000,000 or 150.

Posted by: Rodney A Stanton at February 16, 2006 03:14 PM (lwdxR)

10 Rod Whats up Marine! Ya got that right! whatever figure - they will bitch. Hell, call their hand! Don't think there should be a list - or one with just a couple of names .... THEN FUCKIN' SAY SO! As we have all learned - they don't actually have the balls to take a definitve positioned specific stand .. not until they get the results from about 300+ polls and focus groups.

Posted by: hondo at February 16, 2006 05:47 PM (fyKFC)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
21kb generated in CPU 0.0627, elapsed 0.15 seconds.
118 queries taking 0.1428 seconds, 246 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.