1
Liberals are brilliant morons.
Brilliant because most PhDs are Liberals, and morons because they're so fucking stupid.
Posted by: Carlos at May 09, 2005 09:33 AM (8e/V4)
2
So why was MG being named jackass of the week? I read what she said and it sounded more like she's making sure everyone thinks about why 9/11 happened and why America is so hated. It's pretty dumb to assume terrorists are 'jealous' of freedom. There are many other issues that motivate them... Either way, worldwide polls don't lie, most of the world hates our ass, justified or not.
Carlos: are you maybe 'jealous' of intelligent people? I know plenty of PhD's who are quite liberal and they aren't 'fucking stupid'. They are kick ass, motivated people with balls who do what they say and don't take shit from people who say 'fucking stupid' things like you just did.
Posted by: steven baber at May 09, 2005 07:03 PM (ruF1Q)
3
I know plenty of PhD's who are quite liberal and they aren't 'fucking stupid'.
steven,
I know you do, that's what I just said.
And by the way, being "motivated" doesn't impress me if you're motivated to do jackass things, like be a more effective Liberal, or a more ignorant Hollywood actor. Hitler and Stalin were motivated. "Motivated" is therefore a neutral thing. It can be good, or bad. In your case, probably bad.
And I'm a fucking lawyer starting my own practice so don't talk to me about balls and motivated, idiot.
Posted by: Carlos at May 09, 2005 09:30 PM (8e/V4)
4
Terrorists aren't jealous of our Freedom, they are afraid of it. If everybody in the middle east were free of tin pot dictators and religious fanatics, the middle east would be as rich as we are, both culturally and financially. Women would be free to walk the streets, wearing whatever they wanted, and there would be tourism through the sacred thoroughfares.
If people were free in the middle east, they could follow their dreams, and might even stop praying 5 times a day.
Hopefully someday, the people of the middle east will rise up and tell the mullah's to vamoose and go back to their caves.
Posted by: A Texan at May 10, 2005 01:28 AM (LtbPK)
5
Hahaha! Carlos, you're a LAWYER? You're trying to impress me with THAT? Oh, man. You must not win many cases because I don't find your posts very convincing. Starting a practice doesn't have anything to do with having balls or being motivated: Congrats, you are trying to do what a million other dishonest people have done to line their pockets. Oh yeah, and if 'motivated' is neutral, why do a million lawyers use the word LIBERALLY on their resumes? Why do you brag about your silly little practice using the word?
Posted by: steven baber at May 10, 2005 04:41 PM (NT+s0)
6
Texan:
"If everybody in the middle east were free of tin pot dictators and religious fanatics, the middle east would be as rich as we are, both culturally and financially."
--So our culture is richer than theirs because you say so? They aren't RICH? Who do you think rips us off for oil? Don't be ignorant too long or they'll finally get a nuke and turn Texas into a parking lot. I do agree with you about hoping they stop all that praying...I think everyone should stop talking to imaginary friends in the sky and wake the fuck up. That goes for any religion with fuckwad extremists...here and everywhere.
Posted by: steven baber at May 10, 2005 04:47 PM (NT+s0)
7
Oh yeah, and if 'motivated' is neutral, why do a million lawyers use the word LIBERALLY on their resumes?
hahaha! what a maroon. If anybody puts 'motivated' on his resume he's either a high school kid, a college drop out, or a PhD without any real world work experience. No wonder you hippies can't find real jobs, no wonder all you do is bitch and moan about how bad capitalism is-- you put 'motivated' on your resumes and nobody hires you. And of course everybody knows you aren't motivated, you're mooches, whiners and losers. I'd rather hire a my blind, 3-legged dog than some Lib PhD who puts 'motivated' on his resume.
Posted by: Carlos at May 10, 2005 08:01 PM (8e/V4)
8
Carlos, I've never needed a resume since I'm my own boss. I'll never be a rank-and-file corporate whore, or defending one like you might be. I don't bitch and moan about capitalism, just greedy fools like yourself who only care about....YOURSELF! Your greed fits the punishment of being rammed up the ass by Hilary Clinton with a gigantic unlubricated strap-on! *sound of gavel dropping*
Posted by: steven baber at May 11, 2005 06:00 PM (UcHGM)
9
What a joke being called selfish by a Lib, when it's a proven fact that Red staters-- CONSERVATIVES-- give more to charity even though they make less money. NJ-- a Blue state-- is tops in salaries but 47th in charitable donations. So now you know where to put selfish, right up your ass.
Posted by: Carlos at May 12, 2005 12:13 AM (8e/V4)
10
Carlos, I'm not a fucking 'lib' or a conservative, so your labels fail to define me. If the red states stopped giving money to the Christian insanity TV drive, then your charity numbers would fall flat on their former slave owning asses. Also, who the fuck are you calling 'conservative' when Bushie spends our future out of existence? How many 'conservatives' really conserve anything? (natural resources for example) How many 'red staters' drive economy cars instead of huge SUVs/Trucks that compensate for their tiny puds? What's up with all the flyovers buying trucks and not hauling anything but their obese McDonalds ass around? If the West and East coast kicked the midwest out of the USA, you'd be Mexico's bitch in no time. The midwest is a joke...a joke that you don't get because your brother is your father too!
Posted by: steven baber at May 12, 2005 11:15 AM (WfZ6a)
11
steven,
if you kicked the red states out you'd starve to death. What are you going to eat, your stocks and bonds? That's all you've got now anyway. You don't even have industry anymore. China and Mexico got all that. And for thr record, I believe the elites of BOTH parties have sold us down the road. I don't give a shit about George Bush. I'm a conservative, not a Republican.
Posted by: Carlos at May 12, 2005 12:56 PM (8e/V4)
12
Nah, Carlos: California would keep us alive with it's agriculture, fishing, wine and the boatloads of money to be made if pot was legalized! Not to mention the TV and movie industry...I agree with you that both parties have fucked over the USA. What defines a conservative to you?
Posted by: steven baber at May 12, 2005 05:44 PM (WfZ6a)
13
Steven,
Well Texas aint so bad either. We got it all here.
Conservatives in my book are anybody who opposes the atheist soci alists, the culture destroyers, the moral relativists-- today known as Liberals. Heck, even religious muslims are cool in my book compared to you people.
Posted by: Carlos at May 12, 2005 06:14 PM (8e/V4)
14
I hope in 'you people' you aren't lumping my ass in with any of that that crap. I've only been through Northern Texas and all I remember was the smell of cow shit!
Posted by: steven baber at May 12, 2005 08:58 PM (WfZ6a)
15
steven,
you're a Liberal, and assume you're fully on board with their agenda for overturning the established order, and with it the traditions and values that the regular folks you claim to care about hold dearest. But you don't care for them. You hold them in contempt-- that's why you try to socially engineer them. But as long as you feel it's your duty to socially engineer them, they'll never be your ally against the economic elites. Regular folks hate you more than they fear the economic elites. They hate social engineering far more than they hate economic engineering.
Northern Texas does blow because it's cattle country. East and central Texas is good for forests and hills, and West Texas is good for dessert. Southern Texas blows too though.
Posted by: Carlos at May 13, 2005 09:40 AM (8e/V4)
16
Overturning the established order? Last time I checked, it is our American duty to make sure that 'order' isn't abused like it is now. My thoughts that our government and corporations are corrupt does not make me a liberal, it makes me a patriot who cares how this country is run. As far as 'regular folks'...if you're referring to rural Americans: They are often under educated, underpaid and easily manipulated by our media/govt./corp. I grew up in rural America and I'm a city dweller now...I notice these differences like night and day. I don't feel threatened by traditions and values as long as they aren't racist, suppressive or harmful to others. I am harsh and pointed with my insults, but I don't really hold 'regular folks' in contempt. I think most people are lazy and ignorant, but I don't blame them...it's human nature! As long as everyone's water runs, food is on the table and the TV buzzes away, everyone is comfortable. That's why 9/11 was such a spank. People usually don't take action unless their way of life is threatened. Yes, our nation's poorest elect our nations' richest...and those leaders say one thing, do another and the poor keep getting poorer. What do you think is a solution? Maybe I'll venture into other parts of Texas someday. Maybe my next road trip?
Posted by: steven baber at May 13, 2005 01:41 PM (WfZ6a)
17
Steven,
not easily manipulated, as your failure to make any inroads amongst them bespeaks. They just happen to know what they believe, and they aren't going to change in order to please the very Libs who obviously hold them in such contempt.
And where the hell is Collin these days? Miss the little guy.
Posted by: Carlos at May 13, 2005 03:19 PM (8e/V4)
18
I don't think it's about me trying to make inroads, I'm talking about 'regular folks' who believe everything they hear/see on TV, which we all know is a bit removed from reality and always biased. I know you don't care about Bushie, but according to the polls, 'regular folks' aren't too pleased with him. Collin? I dunno...I'm sure he's lurking around somewhere. Maybe him and Gayrooster are out having a Zell Miller style duel?
Posted by: steven baber at May 13, 2005 05:24 PM (WfZ6a)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment