It's not so much that I blame CNN for not running the controversial Muhammed cartoon, as much as I wish they'd be just a tad bit more honest about it. They claim they won't run the picturs out of religious sensitivities,
. No, it's not
. It's called
.
1
I don't think it was fear, I think they just want everyone to know who's side they're on.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 06, 2006 02:12 PM (0yYS2)
2
It's funny how they always end up on the anti-American side of every dispute.
Liberal hypocracy has been on display quite a bit in the last few weeks.
First the Google - China issue. Now this cartoon fiasco.
Posted by: MarcoPolo at February 06, 2006 02:29 PM (dH8aR)
3
I remember the exibit very well here in NY. There were complaints and demonstrations - attendance was modest - exibit went on tour only to select cities (small number) in the US - bastions of the left no less.
It did however go on tour to Europe - with wide and great acceptance and applause.
Posted by: hondo at February 06, 2006 02:59 PM (3aakz)
4
CNN the Communist News Network and Big Bad Wolf Blitzer
Posted by: sandpiper at February 06, 2006 03:23 PM (as4nC)
5
And how many Christians called for the people who created the exibit to be killed. I personally didn't like it, but I recognize someone's right to do it, although it was juvenile. As long as these things aren't being done at the taxpayer's expense, I have no problem with them. Only an idiot would be enamored with such a thing, but heh, it's ok to be an idiot.
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 06, 2006 03:26 PM (rUyw4)
6
I'm sure there would be squeals from all these left wing media outlets if George Bush had asked them not to publish certain christian pictures, he'd get the 'freedom of speech' crap thrown in his face, there would be mass hysterics all round.
however in this case, its all sensitive and warm and fuzzy bending over, submission. hypocrites.
Posted by: MathewK at February 06, 2006 05:33 PM (pVHqF)
7
When the war comes to our streets, we will have to kill as many liberals as muslims, because they'll be helping them any way they can. Liberals are traitors to humanity and a scourge to civilization, and should be purged from amongst us.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 06, 2006 09:44 PM (0yYS2)
8
to those who claim the Christian Right is intolerant, here is some comparisons between the Bible and the qur'an
in the Gospels, where the founder Jesus speaks, hell is mentioned only in these verses
Matthew chapter 5 verse 22 5 v 29 5 v 30 10 v 28
11 v 23 16 v 18 18 v 9 23 v 15
23 v 33
Mark 9 v 43 9 v 45 9 v 47
Luke 10 v 15 12 v 5 16 v 23
also in the Gospels the term punishment is used in
Matthew 25 v 46
THUS THE GOSPELS USE THE TERMS HELL AND PUNISHMENT ONLY 16 TIMES. THE GOSPELS CONTAIN 3789 VERSES TOTAL
now for the qur'an. i will use the verses in surah 2 only
the qur'an uses the terms 'burned in fire', punished etc in the following verses
v 7 v10 v 24 v27 v 39 v 59 v 61 v 79 (these terms are used twice in this verse) v 80 v 81 v 85 v 86 v 89 v 90(these terms are used twice in this verse) v96 v 104 v114 v121 v126 v161 v165 v166 v 167 v 174(these terms are used twice in this verse) v 178 v191 v196 v 201 v 206 v 211 v 217 v 257 v 275
THEREFORE THE qur'an USED THE TERMS BURNED BY FIRE AND PUNISHMENT ON 36 OCCASSIONS IN SURAH 2 WHICH HAS A TOTAL OF 286 VERSES.
THEREFOR THE GOSPELS OF THE BIBLE USES WHAT SOME MAY CALL TERMS OF INTORLERANCE 16 TIMES IN 3789 VERSES
the percentage is 0.448 (thus less than one half of one percent)
WHILE THE qur'an USES WHAT SOME MAY CALL TERMS OF INTORERANCE 36 TIMES IN 286 VERSES (PROVIDED SURAH 2 ONLY IS USED)
the percentage is 12.58 percent
Posted by: hillary doesn't see the light at February 07, 2006 08:01 AM (Wbzhd)
9
To compare the Bible to the koran is just useless hand-waving, because words printed on paper ultimately don't matter; it's the actions of the people who read those words that matter. No more need be said.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 07, 2006 02:47 PM (0yYS2)
10
maximus improboulus
do not try to discourage me to present evidence.
if no one presents evidence, then you are like the liberals who just say what comes into their heads without regards to what the world of electrons, protons and nuetrons is like.
people are motivated by what you find in print
therefore the claims of critics of the religous right is intolerant can be proven FALSE by such evidence as comparing the Bible and qur'an since there is a set of people who do their best to follow the Bible, and there is a set of people who do their best to follow the qur'an
but liberals typically try to avoid providing evidence. example: there are those who call talk show host jay severn, and try to make a false claim, and when jay tells them to present their evidence, the caller rants on about other topics, so jay severn says that he will give the caller a second chance to provide the evidence, and when the caller fails to do it 3 times jay severn hangs up on the caller, because it was just another liberal trying to get propagnda out in the opening.
another example of the propaganda technique was when hitlers gestapo and other followers use to make the statements that jews and gypsys were useless eaters when the truth is it was gestapo and other followers of hitler who were the useless eaters.
so i will present evidence and announce where the information can be found
Posted by: hillary doesn't see the light at February 08, 2006 07:49 AM (Wbzhd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment