February 18, 2006

Should Congress Investigate the ACLU?

Jay at Stop the ACLU is calling on Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to appoint a Special Counsel to investigate the activities of the ACLU. Among other things, Jay cites dissension within the ACLU ranks resulting in multiple resignations and ACLU spying on their own members.

One of the most troubling points is that in 2004 the ACLU refused to accept $1.15 million in grants from the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations because:

“The Ford Foundation now bars recipients of its funds from engaging in any activity that “promotes violence, terrorism, bigotry, or the destruction of any state.”

The Rockefeller Foundation’s provisions state that recipients of its funds may not “directly or indirectly engage in, promote, or support other organizations or individuals who engage in or promote terrorist activity.”

The ACLU was later successful in getting these minor requirements scrapped.

Why?

Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.

Posted by: Bluto at 12:01 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 158 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Uh, is that a trick question? Congress ya say. Hmmmmm.

Posted by: forest hunter at February 18, 2006 01:56 AM (Fq6zR)

2 >>>Why? Because to the ACLU those activities are "free speech".

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 18, 2006 07:46 AM (M3nr/)

3 The ACLU the Atheists.Communists and lawyers UNderground the al queda of america

Posted by: sandpiper at February 18, 2006 09:14 AM (162Hn)

4 No, Congress should not investigate them, the military should round them up and give them all a bullet in the back of the head.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 18, 2006 02:18 PM (0yYS2)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
16kb generated in CPU 0.0629, elapsed 0.2468 seconds.
118 queries taking 0.2322 seconds, 239 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.