September 13, 2005

Reconstructing Terrorists

Our success in the War on Terror has created an ethical and logistical problem. What do we do with the hundreds of terrorists who have been captured? What is the most just way to deal with pure Evil?

Warehousing them at Guantanamo Bay is, at best, a temporary solution. At worst, not only are our soldiers exposed daily to twisted, malevolent subhumans, but traitors and fools within our own society seek to use their captivity for political profit. We can't transfer custody of many of them to their countries of origin because they might be tortured (though that would be justice for many of the brave jihadi babyhunters). And some of their homelands simply allow them their freedom, so that they can go back to plotting and executing the murders of innocents. We can't (horrors) execute them, because that would be a "waste" of "human life".

So what do we do with the sort of creature who enjoys planning assaults on children?

The Dread Pundit Bluto has a solution. A solution that not only tackles the problem of captured terrorists, but applies it to the solution of another serious, but unrelated, problem, and addresses a secondary evil peripherally. Three birds with one stone. We have a surfeit of captured terrorists. We have a shortage of healthy organs available for donation. I see a connection.

I see a vast supply of healthy organs of all types, just waiting to be harvested to save the lives of innocent and deserving people. I see terrorists at last being given an opportunity to redeem a small part of their evil by giving back to the world community. I see the market for illegal organs destroyed.

What better way for a terrorist to (partially) redeem himself than by having his organs used to give worthwhile humans a chance at life?

One final note. You may think this is a tongue-in-cheek essay. If I had the power to enact organ donation as the legal form of execution for those convicted of terrorism, it would begin today.

Hat tip to one of the world's finest science fiction authors, Larry Niven, who first used the idea of organ donation as a form of capital punishment decades ago as a story element.

Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto.

Posted by: Bluto at 11:53 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 384 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Very easy. Kill them. Hang 'em en masse. I would be happy to assist.

Posted by: Filthy Allah at September 13, 2005 12:13 PM (5ceWd)

2 Pelosi wonÂ’t even let us pee on their Korans, how are we going to harvest their organs?

Posted by: Brad at September 13, 2005 12:28 PM (3OPZt)

3 Ummm, yuck. Perhaps some of the more devout livers would be in better shape than mine, but I'm still not ready to go cutting on people. I'll endorse a ticking-bomb exception to the no-torture rule, but come on, this ain't communist china.

Posted by: See-Dubya at September 13, 2005 12:51 PM (jV2ep)

4 See-Dubya: The PRC crack is a red herring. If you're willing to have convicted terrorists executed, then why should they be allowed to carry valuable resources to the grave with them?

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 13, 2005 04:02 PM (RHG+K)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
17kb generated in CPU 0.0132, elapsed 0.101 seconds.
118 queries taking 0.0936 seconds, 239 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.