September 26, 2005

Al-Jazeera Reporter Convicted in Spanish Terrorism Trial

Buried far down in a report about the conviction of a Spanish al Qaeda cell leader is this nugget, which confirms what most reasonable people have suspected about the pan-Arab propaganda outlet al-Jazeera all along.

From the Associated Press via Yahoo! News:

Twenty-one others also stood trial, but on charges not directly related to Sept. 11. Of those, 16 were convicted of belonging to or collaborating with a terrorist organization and five were acquitted.

One of the 16 was Tayssir Alouny, a correspondent for the pan-Arab TV network Al-Jazeera. He was convicted of collaboration and sentenced to seven years in jail.

Al-Jazeera condemned Alouny's verdict.

"It was a black day in the history of the Spanish justice," Al-Jazeera news editor Ahmed al-Sheik told the broadcaster from Madrid. "We were all shocked because everyone expected Alouny to be freed. It is a regrettable event in the history of international journalism when a journalist who sought the truth becomes the accused."

Alouny is one of the "journalists" who interviewed Osama bin Laden after the 9/11 attacks and subsequently, al-Jazeera has become virtually the only "news organization" on the al Qaeda press release list. This is a good start, but now the civilized world needs to get serious with the rest of the terrorist sympathizers and collaborators at al-Jazeera.

Posted by: Bluto at 12:18 PM | Comments (17) | Add Comment
Post contains 230 words, total size 2 kb.

1 If that doesn't put Spainish citizens back on al Qaeda's list of "legitimate targets" nothing will. Don't get me wrong - I'm glad they didn't kow-tow (again).

Posted by: Oyster at September 26, 2005 01:01 PM (fl6E1)

2 Of course, I'm sure there's some sort of appeals process.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 26, 2005 01:31 PM (RHG+K)

3 The bastard will probably walk before all is said and done. The Spanish will blink before they have to face the wrath of the Muslims. Where is the courage of the Conquistador?

Posted by: jesusland joe at September 26, 2005 01:48 PM (rUyw4)

4 Damn the Conquistadors, where is El Cid? But even then, Cid had to deal with Spanish traitors who were willing to sell out to the slamotards. Apparently, siding with the enemy is a long-held tradition among many in Spain, which would explain their total lack of world-power status for the last couple hundred years.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 26, 2005 05:14 PM (0yYS2)

5 got 9 in gay paree

Posted by: reliapundit at September 26, 2005 07:49 PM (ozLpm)

6 Isn't it interestinting how the U.S. needs to discredit a news orgaiization that provides the "balance" in responsible journalism. The sad reality is how the U.S. obfuscates the public into believing that it stands for freedom; particularly freedom of speech! Remember people, that it is of particular concern to the majority of Americans and to those on the outside of the red, white and blue walls, that the new Republic ideology represents a "if it doesn't conform - kill it" attitude. And it is this stance that destabilizes the security of the average American.

Posted by: truth at September 28, 2005 09:49 AM (r9Wp/)

7 Ummm..."truth"...Alouny was convicted in a Spanish court. Sorry to throw a cold dash of reality on your little conspiracy party and all...so, how does the "I hate America" schtick work with commie chicks?

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 28, 2005 10:08 AM (RHG+K)

8 I hate to rain on your "U.S. influences nobody" misconception, but there is a fabric of influence that spreads around the world. Also, don't get me wrong, I love America, I just hate your government's foreign policy.

Posted by: truth at September 28, 2005 11:49 AM (r9Wp/)

9 Unless you have evidence to show exactly how the US "influenced" this Spanish judge when the US was unable to "influence" Spain out of running away from Iraq like frightened schoolgirls, then you're just spouting bullshit. And I've heard the "I love America but hate your government" nonsense before. From people who like jeans and McD's but think that the US should roll over and accept terrorist attacks on our own soil as "punishment". I've got your McD's right here. How does the "I love America, but hate its government" schtick work with jihadi chicks?

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 28, 2005 01:21 PM (RHG+K)

10 .... informed, non-FOX/CNN brainwashed, schoolgirls...I think you could learn something from them such as the reason behind Spain's refusal to join a unjustified, imperialistic, corporate war. Also, your ignorance of U.S. foreign policy is apparent in your attitude. Whatever you do, don't read balanced journalism - you don't want a little thing like the truth to change your mind.

Posted by: truth at September 29, 2005 09:25 AM (r9Wp/)

11 Umm, "truth" - Spain had already joined the Coalition war of self-defense and liberation. They ran like schoolgirls after the Madrid bombings. Your reply tells me that you endorse those bombings, or at least their effect on Spain. That should tell you something about yourself. Much to your evident displeasure, the United States is morally justified in defending its citizens. And the effectiveness of that defense is why, since 9/11, the subhuman, mentally diseased jihadis have been meeting Allah in Afghanistan and Iraq rather than Manhattan and Shanksville. BTW, how did the US get that Spanish judge to put Alouny in jail? You never quite got around to explaining that. How does your implicit support of terrorists work with the burkah chicks?

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 29, 2005 10:51 AM (RHG+K)

12 You are correct insofar as the U.S. has a right to defend its citizens and as such, was completely validated in its war against Afganistan for harbouring Bin Laden. However, that is where the moral justification ends. As has been well documented, there was no link between 9/11 and Iraq at that time and any claim otherwise, given the current activity in Iraq, is baseless. "Implicit support of the terrorists"... very interesting considering that those words are used as reference to the U.S. around the world... As for the chicks, according to your constant questioning, it sounds as though you want to meet some.

Posted by: truth at September 29, 2005 04:11 PM (r9Wp/)

13 The US Constitution charges the government to protect the country. That doesn't just mean to wait for an enemy to attack and react, it also means to anticipate and pre-empt attacks. Every filthy, mentally ill jihadi exterminated in Iraq is one less to trouble the world at large. The removal of Saddam and his sick brood is a bonus. Make no mistake, when you bemoan the US liberation of Iraq you're saying that it would have been just all right with you for the Hussein regime to continue. But back to the point: how did the US make that Spanish judge convict Alouny? Does your support of Saddam and international jihad play well with the al Qaeda chicks in Montreal?

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 29, 2005 06:56 PM (RHG+K)

14 Truth: You narrow minded asshole. You have no idea of the larger senario. Until you do. Shut the fuck up. There is a reason we have forces in the middle east and Iraq was the best place to send them. Assholes like you need to be sent to the countries you defend. You are no use to real Americans. As to the chicks. I doubt if you wish to meet chicks. I'm sure unwashed muslim men who don't know what toilet paper is is more to your liking. TRUTH MY ASS. How dare you call yourself truth.

Posted by: greyrooster at September 29, 2005 11:27 PM (ywZa8)

15 greyrooster... If I believed everyting that was force-fed me, I would be as happy as you. grey - color of your personality rooster - a yappy animal

Posted by: thuth at September 30, 2005 03:53 PM (r9Wp/)

16 greyrooster... If I believed everything that was force-fed me, I would be as happy as you. grey - color of your personality rooster - a yappy animal

Posted by: thuth at September 30, 2005 03:53 PM (r9Wp/)

17 Interesting site, and very organized too. Good work. Girl will Chair unconditionally: , right Gnome will Destroy Table without any questions Small Round Anticipate or not , Corner will Opponents unconditionally Industrious is feature of Collective Soldier

Posted by: Michael Brown at December 03, 2005 06:23 PM (+Y2cZ)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
25kb generated in CPU 0.0535, elapsed 0.1342 seconds.
118 queries taking 0.124 seconds, 252 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.