April 10, 2006
Make Your Own Taco Day
Today is supposedly when millions of illegal Mexican squatters are being told to stay home from work and not buy anything to show the omnipotent power they have over the U.S. economy.
No word yet on whether illegal Chinese, Saudi, or Haitians (or any other nationality) have been invited to take part.
Racism has nothing to do with it. Since the illegals agitating for attention are Hispanic, then it's the illegal Hispanics who will get the attention. And the mocking that goes along with it.
Here where I live, some businesses, mainly Mexican restaurants, are closing for the day in solidarity with the insurgents. Therefore, if your situation is similar, I'm marking this as Make Your Own Taco Day.
Just trot down to your favorite still-open market, purchase the delicious fresh ingredients (no box crap allowed! That's too easy) and make your own scrumptious Mexican-style meal. If you want a nice frozen adult beverage to go with it, swap the tequila for rum and have a Daquiri instead of a Margarita.
Or, if you are just lousy in the kitchen, find an authentic Mexican restaurant that is open and offer them your patronage and hard earned cash.
Our current open-border policy is a bona fide national security threat. Anyone can sneak over our border, nobody's sitting there qualifying Mexicans over Muslims to creep in.
Seal the damned border, we can figure out what to do about those already here later.
And fly your American flag proudly today, if you aren't already.
Posted by: Vinnie at
06:12 AM
| Comments (19)
| Add Comment
Post contains 261 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I'm as WASP as the come, yet my
chiles rellenos kick some major butt.
I can handle a walkout.
Posted by: Russ at April 10, 2006 06:39 AM (utsLN)
2
I'm as WASP as they come, yet my
chiles rellenos kick some major butt.
I can handle a walkout.
Posted by: Russ at April 10, 2006 06:39 AM (utsLN)
Posted by: Rusty at April 10, 2006 07:06 AM (JQjhA)
4
Seal the damn border NOW. We'll deal with the squatters later.
Posted by: n.a. palm at April 10, 2006 07:20 AM (ECLHt)
5
I keep trying to tell ya'll, it will be up to the citizens of the United States to seal the border. The government is just not interested. The Democrats want the illegals for their votes, and many Republicans want the domestic and yard help. If a terrorist slips through, so what? Neither of these groups really care about the US.
Posted by: jesusland joe at April 10, 2006 07:28 AM (rUyw4)
6
I have finally realized after all these years just what inept cowards we have running this country (USA). The bill they were going to pass was one of the stupidest things I've ever heard of. One provision would have required amnesty-seekers to "promise to be upstanding citizens". LOL. And just how were they going to figure out how long these people have been here? Less than two years and they would have to return to their country of origin. Between 2-5 years, they'd have to return briefly, get carded, and then return to the US. THIS is what our "leaders" came up with???? They actually expected to get the truth as to how long an illegal immigrant has been here? LOL. It's absolutely stupid. I want that border sealed and pronto. I had an RNC guy call me up and ask for money (like they always do). I told him, "Until you guys get this stuff under control, don't call me again". I hope they're getting the same response from millions of Americans.
Posted by: Richard at April 10, 2006 07:54 AM (7KF8r)
7
Great, now I'm hungry......
Chicken enchiladas w/sour cream sauce....mmmmmmmmmm....
(wiping drool from the keyboard)
Posted by: Lonevoice at April 10, 2006 09:44 AM (CvGtv)
8
There are many good, hardworking people who come here, both legally and illegally, to support their families and make a better life for themselves, and the shame is that those will be hurt by the actions of a few radicals who don't have such noble intentions. Meanwhile in the government camp, the band plays on...
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 10, 2006 09:50 AM (0yYS2)
9
Tacos???? I wish! I wish it was all (illegal immigration) coming from just one location! But its not. Mexicans may be number 1 but ....
Immigration advocates like to believe that the illegals are one big happy family - they actually think a stupid term like Hispanic denotes "natural unity".
Come the next recession - just watch how unified illegal Mexicans, Pervians, Guatemalans, Salvadorians, Haitians, Muslims, Africans, Chinese, Koreans, etc. etc. etc. are! - especially with an offical unemployment rate 12-15% amongst legals and citizens - and 30-40% amongst illegals.
It should be interesting - especially when illegals compete for jobs not only amongst themselves - but against legals and citizens too!
Posted by: hondo at April 10, 2006 09:50 AM (4mgfY)
10
We're screwed, you know. The Republicans don't want to punish the businesses who hire illegals and the Democrats don't want to punish the illegals for invading.
And I want Harry Reid to get his butt down here to Florida and MAKE ME SOME DAMN TACOS!
Posted by: Oyster at April 10, 2006 10:55 AM (w8kVd)
11
I wonder what the true number is for all the illegal aliens who now occupy our country. Suffice it to say that it tops the 10-11 million government estimate. I bet it is closer to 20 million, with no one either in or out of government able to get a hand on it.
After this amnesty, what do you think will happen next? The Democrats will return to power, no border patrol agents will be hired, an open borders policy will be encouraged, and the US will disappear as a nation.
The legislation before Congress right now will decide the future of the US. Will it be a French solution of appeasement, or will it be a solution that allows the nation to survive? Probably the French version, but one can still hope.
Posted by: jesusland joe at April 10, 2006 10:59 AM (rUyw4)
12
Cheap labor, good economy, rose-colored glasses over the implications and meaning of multi-culturalism and diversity.
No action will be taken at this time - gov only responds when severe crisis actually occurs - right now its tolerable.
Expect response in future when economy goes south - flash points with be urban areas where illegals compete against each other group, and especially African Americans - look to LA, Florida, areas with high black populations, and/or exceptionally diverse immigrant populations.
It will get ugly and violent - urban gov services will breakdown without massive tax increases on citizen population - current high national debt and budget deficits have removed any possible cushion.
How bad it gets - no one can tell - watch the business community - decentralization and relocation now completely possible due to communications revolution - they have been looking to make the complete jump out of central cities since the 60/70s.
Posted by: hondo at April 10, 2006 11:40 AM (4mgfY)
13
Does this apply to vertical tacos?
Posted by: memphis761 at April 10, 2006 12:33 PM (D3+20)
14
Why, yes memphis, it does.
Tuna flavored, even.
Did I just say that?
Posted by: Vinnie at April 10, 2006 02:15 PM (/qy9A)
Posted by: Oyster at April 10, 2006 03:28 PM (n/kLX)
16
What do you mean, "yeesh." You named yourself after an aphrodisiac, after all.
Posted by: Vinnie at April 10, 2006 04:20 PM (/qy9A)
Posted by: Oyster at April 11, 2006 06:01 AM (YudAC)
18
At least I didn't name myself "bearded clam".
Posted by: Oyster at April 11, 2006 06:07 AM (YudAC)
Posted by: jesusland joe at April 11, 2006 09:38 AM (rUyw4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Saddam Intended Suicide Missions Against US
Showing the sort of initiative that
should be coming from an alert mainstream press, Ed Morrissey of
Captain's Quarters has confirmed the translation of a captured Iraqi document asking for volunteers for a "Suicide Mission" against "American Interests".
Fearing that critics would claim the document had been mistranslated because the original translation had been done for the Free Republic, Morrissey hired two independent translators to confirm the original. Captain Ed has posted the results, both of which confirm the original translation:
The top secret letter 2205 of the Military Branch of Al Qadisya on 4/3/2001 announced by the top secret letter 246 from the Command of the military sector of Zi Kar on 8/3/2001 announced to us by the top secret letter 154 from the Command of Ali Military Division on 10/3/2001 we ask to provide that Division with the names of those who desire to volunteer for Suicide Mission to liberate Palestine and to strike American Interests and according what is shown below to please review and inform us.
This document, in and of itself, proves that Saddam had not only contemplated terrorism against US interests, but was actively recruiting martyrs for that purpose. The conclusion is obvious, as stated by Captain Ed: "...destroying Saddam's regime is an integral part of the war on terror, not a distraction."
The mainstream media has yet to report the existence of this document.
Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.
Posted by: Bluto at
12:40 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 253 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Interesting document. Translation certainly seems defensible. Next question - is the document real? Plenty of motive and opportunity for someone to have inserted a forged document into the mix. I'm not saying they DID, just that they might have, and that it will be very difficult to prove they did not.
Follow-up question - did this document address the INCEPTION of such a terrorist infiltration or was it just one more brick in the structure? There are still unanswered questions about possible Iraqi involvement peripheral to the OKC bombing years earlier, for instance.
Posted by: Glenmore at April 10, 2006 05:28 AM (gqMPg)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 09, 2006
MSM Steps Up Propaganda Campaign Against US Military
How else to explain the grossly offensive way that
Washington Post writer Thomas E. Ricks chose to phrase his
"exposé" disclosing that [gasp] the American military would like Iraqis to think badly of brutal terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi? [emphasis added to excerpt below]
The U.S. military is conducting a propaganda campaign to magnify the role of the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq, according to internal military documents and officers familiar with the program. The effort has raised his profile in a way that some military intelligence officials believe may have overstated his importance and helped the Bush administration tie the war to the organization responsible for the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
The idea that publicizing the undisputed terrorist acts of Zarqawi in an effort to cut off any support he has among the Iraqi populace is somehow nefarious is ridiculous. This is the man who sawed off Nick Berg's head.
Ricks is likewise outraged that the US "home audience" is part of the "propaganda operation". Horrors! Everyone knows that only mainstream journalists are allowed to target American citizens with propaganda. Actually, Ricks' outrage seems to be jealousy that a New York Times reporter, Dexter Filkins, was given a scoop that Ricks missed out on. Since it wasn't given to Ricks it's not a "tip", it's a "leak".
In his zeal to damage the Bush administration, reporter Ricks has betrayed his profession, as well as his country.
Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.
Posted by: Bluto at
10:16 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 256 words, total size 2 kb.
1
What a dirtbag this Ricks is..
When the insurgents kill a few hundred in Iraq, its all bloodshed, civil war, millions rising up against the infidel americans. When the insurgents are rightly blamed for murdering iraqis, then its suddenly, oh just a small part, no big fish.
One has to wonder where the loyalties lie, of someone who wants to defend the name of a child murdering bag of excretement.
Posted by: MathewK at April 09, 2006 11:46 PM (pVHqF)
2
Zarqawi.... a psyop? Gee.... I thought he was dead. Starting to look like flavor of the month is the new Goldstein... the object of the Two Minute Hate.
===
Iraq militants claim al-Zarqawi is dead
Al Qaida-linked extremist suspected of planning attacks
AP file Undated photo of suspected al-Qaida commander Abu Musaab al-Zarqawi.
Updated: 6:31 a.m. ET March 4, 2004
BAGHDAD, Iraq - A Jordanian extremist suspected of bloody suicide attacks in Iraq was killed some time ago in U.S. bombing and a letter outlining plans for fomenting sectarian war is a forgery, a statement allegedly from an insurgent group west of the capital said.
Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was killed in the Sulaimaniyah mountains of northern Iraq “during the American bombing there,” according to a statement circulated in Fallujah this week and signed by the “Leadership of the Allahu Akbar Mujahedeen.”
There was no way to verify the authenticity of the statement, one of many leaflets put out by a variety of groups taking part in the anti-U.S. resistance.
The statement did not say when al-Zarqawi was supposedly killed, but U.S. jets bombed strongholds of the extremist Ansar al-Islam in the north last April as Saddam HusseinÂ’s regime was collapsing.
It said al-Zarqawi was unable to escape the bombing because of his artificial leg.
Before the Iraq conflict began last March, U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell said al-Zarqawi received hospital treatment in Baghdad after fleeing Afghanistan. U.S. intelligence sources said he apparently was fitted with an artificial leg.
The statement said the “fabricated al-Zarqawi memo” has been used by the U.S.-run coalition “to back up their theory of a civil war” in Iraq.
In February, the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq made public an intercepted letter it said was written by al-Zarqawi to al-Qaida leaders, detailing a strategy of spectacular attacks to derail the planned June 30 handover of power to the Iraqis. U.S. officials say al-Zarqawi may have been involved in some of the series of suicide bombings this year in Iraq.
“The truth is, al-Qaida is not present in Iraq,” the Mujahedeen statement said. Though many Arabs entered the country to fight U.S. troops, only a small number remain, the group said.
A little over a year ago, Jordanian authorities named al-Zarqawi as the mastermind behind the October 2002 murder of Laurence Foley, a 60-year-old administrator of U.S. aid programs in Jordan.
In a German court last year, Shadi Abdellah, a Palestinian on trial for allegedly plotting to attack BerlinÂ’s Jewish Museum and a Jewish-owned disco, testified he was working for al-Zarqawi. He said they met in Afghanistan.
German authorities have reportedly said they believe al-Zarqawi was appointed by al-QaidaÂ’s leadership to arrange attacks in Europe.
Moroccan government sources said a group blamed for bombings last May that killed 45 people in Casablanca got its orders from al-Zarqawi. In Turkey, officials said he was believed to have played a role in bombings that killed 63 at two synagogues, the British consulate and a British bank in Istanbul in November.
Posted by: 8ackgr0und N015e at April 10, 2006 12:58 AM (K5Ko+)
3
noise,
so where's your actual evidence that Zarqawi is actually dead? Citing Baghdad Bob to that effect isn't very persuasive.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at April 10, 2006 01:56 AM (8e/V4)
4
Wasn't Zarqawi's successes a sign of Bush (US) failure in Iraq, and something he was trying to hide from? Now he is accused of blowing it out of proportion too. Looks like I picked the wrong day to stop sniffing glue.
Posted by: AbbaGav at April 10, 2006 04:36 AM (5XR09)
5
Two minute hate? Suggesting that we, or anyone, only has a two minute attention span and we'll just move on to someone else and forget about him? "Oh, look! Something shiny!" Please. The fact is, there are so many of these guys, it's only two minutes before the next one spouts off.
"In a transcript of the meeting, [Col. Derek] Harvey said, "Our own focus on Zarqawi has enlarged his caricature, if you will -- made him more important than he really is, in some ways."" The media has played Zarqawi up making him larger than life, reporting over and over on him and splashing his photo all over the place for how long now? But let the military campaign against him and it's,
"They're making him out to be too important." Ricks himself has reported on Zarqawi dozens of times as he often contributes to articles with many other reporters as well as writing some on his own.
The fact that there are military people who have disagreements on how any aspect of the war is conducted is nothing new. Col. Harvey thinks Zarqawi shouldn't be played up and someone else thinks he should. So what? But this reporter tries to make this into something it isn't and in effect implies Zarqawi is a bit player.
Posted by: Oyster at April 10, 2006 05:24 AM (YudAC)
6
Noise still hasn't apologized for his allegations that death squads linked to the Interior Ministry and trained by US contractors kidnapped Jill Carroll.
He has also had nothing to say about the Revenge Brigades, who took the credit for Jill's kidnapping, being part of the Islamic Army in Iraq, who are associated with Sunni terrorists. He should also apologize to Rusty for disputing Rusty's great reporting on this connection.
Posted by: jesusland joe at April 10, 2006 07:37 AM (rUyw4)
7
What else do you ever expect from these liberal birdcage liners?
Posted by: sandpiper at April 10, 2006 12:34 PM (I9Upt)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Playboy Launches in Muslim Indonesia on Hef's 80th B-Day

On Hugh Hefner's 80th birthday,
Playboy magazine went on sale in Muslim Indonesia.
From the BBC:
An Indonesian version of Playboy has gone on sale in the world's most populous Muslim nation.
A spokesman for the magazine, which has promised to tone down its erotic photographs, said copies would be available in major cities on Friday.
The launch has drawn criticism from Muslim clerics, who condemn the magazine as a corrupting influence.
Earlier this year there were street protests in many towns when the magazine announced its plans to launch.
As previously reported (
here and
here), everyone is not thrilled. There continue to be protests by Muslim groups demanding that the sellers of
Playboy be arrested and prosecuted under pornography laws. However, the magazine displays no nudity and is believed to be tamer than other magazines being sold in Indonesia.
Nevertheless, here's wishing Hugh Hefner a "Happy Birthday!" and congratulations on Playboy magazine's successful launch in the Muslim nation of Indonesia.
As an interesting side note, the last I heard, Playboy is still prohibited from being sold on military bases in the U.S. I guess this means that Muslim suppression of free speech doesn't hold a candle to good American political correctness. (H/T Pirate's Cove)
From Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
10:06 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 223 words, total size 2 kb.
1
To Islam, with Love.
Hef should be in charge of the Department of Pissing Off Imams.
Posted by: Kermit at April 09, 2006 10:32 PM (RTy2V)
2
I think it was banned from the bases and also by 7-11 stores because of the religous right. It is banned also in both Koreas,India,Taiwan,Singapore, and Malaysia. Also in that most sexually conservative of buddhist nations..... Thailand.
Posted by: john Ryan at April 09, 2006 10:33 PM (TcoRJ)
3
Dirka Dirka!! Alla RACKbar!!
Posted by: mrclark at April 10, 2006 06:16 AM (Na6eO)
4
Yep, the Religious Right threatened to kill or riot against those 7-11 stores that chose to sell Playboys. John Ryan, I wonder if you have any idea how you come across when you try to draw a moral equivalence between Christianity and Islam.
Posted by: jesusland joe at April 10, 2006 07:51 AM (rUyw4)
5
John is quite the philosophical contortionist, isn't he?
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 10, 2006 09:52 AM (0yYS2)
6
Will they put a FATWA on HUGH HEFNER?
Posted by: sandpiper at April 10, 2006 12:36 PM (I9Upt)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Blog Sabbath Caption Contest: More Than Walnuts on the Lawn Edition.

Or posted way late edition, whatever
Ap Via Yahoo : An unidentified intruder, right, shouts as he is approached by a member of the Secret Service Emergency Response Team on the North Lawn of the White House, Sunday, April 9, 2006 in Washington.
Er uh caption the nut! I like the God says, “You really owe me for this one!” But it will be hard to beat what he actually said.
Yahoo : Secret Service spokesman Eric Zahren identified the man as 40-year-old Brian Lee Patterson, "I have intelligence information for the president," he said, waving his arms in the air. "I'm not afraid of you!"
Update fatwa's issued should have titled this one "Not Much Response Edition". Therefore I will not bump it up.
Fatwa issued against the winner Improbulus Maximus for :
Time to up the dosage it seems.
Fatwa issued against Orlando for :
I will remain here until President Sheehan takes her lawful place.
Honorable mention to Venom becuase Vinnie says if I want to live a long life I'd better. And sorry Graeme you can't win very time.
Posted by: Howie at
08:20 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 200 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: mychimo at April 09, 2006 08:56 PM (uxuQL)
2
MORE COWBELL!
(my link will actually work on this one.)
Posted by: mychimo at April 09, 2006 09:13 PM (uxuQL)
3
"I am just a victim of being on the White House lawn while white!"
Posted by: Graeme at April 10, 2006 09:39 AM (PgW7o)
4
Time to up the dosage it seems.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 10, 2006 09:53 AM (0yYS2)
5
I will remain here until President Sheehan takes her lawful place!
Posted by: orlando at April 10, 2006 11:30 AM (qLdYL)
6
Throw your hands in the air...
And wave 'em like ya just don't care
And if you're mind's gone
While on the White House lawn,
Then give me a big "Oh Yeah!"
Posted by: Venom at April 10, 2006 01:14 PM (dbxVM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Terrorists Release Video of Two German Hostages

I hope they are returned and the criminals who took them face justice soon.
BBC : In an internet statement, their captors issued a threat to kill them if US forces did not release Iraqi prisoners.
Describing the men as "German agents", they said they would be killed if men and women were not freed from the "occupation prisons".
Bareknucklepolitics has a link to the video as well as the Reuters dispatch.
BERLIN (Reuters) via Bareknucklepolitics : - Two German hostages held in Iraq since the end of January have appeared in a video pleading for help, German media reported on Sunday.
The two men appearing in the video were identified by German broadcasters as Rene Braeunlich and Thomas Nitzschke.
The German government stopped short of identifying them, but confirmed it had received a video showing the hostages.
Looking distraught and exhausted, Braeunlich and Nitzschke were shown in front of a black banner with white Arabic writing on it.
One of the men, thought to be Nitzschke, could be heard saying in German: “We have been here for more than 60 days. We are at the end of our nerves. Please help us. We cannot bear this any longer. Please help us.”
The video has a March 28 date stamp on it and is believed to be the fourth video message showing the Germans.
Al Jazeera television also aired a brief portion of the tape, showing the two bearded men standing in front of a black banner bearing the name of the Ansar al-Tawhid Wa-Sunna group.
Hat Tip Orgish : Hosting the video here.
Posted by: Howie at
07:52 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 275 words, total size 2 kb.
1
"Describing the men as "German agents", they said they would be killed if men and women were not freed from the "occupation prisons"."
Where were these "freedom fighters" when Saddam packed his jails with men and women who simply didn't like him?
Posted by: Oyster at April 10, 2006 05:27 AM (YudAC)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Iraqi Shia Protest Against Bombings/Violence.
Gateway Pundit has a great post showing reaction to yesterdayÂ’s bombings. It seems they dislike al-Qaeda.
Gatewaypundit : As the media paints a picture of Civil War, the terrorists in Iraq continue to murder innocent civilians. The worst massacre of the year on Friday was blamed on Al Zarqawi and his thugs and NOT on sectarian division.
After the suicide bombings yesterday at the Buratha mosque in Baghdad that killed over 70 people, Shiites protested for unity today in Iraq..
Al-Qaeda = Failure
Posted by: Howie at
07:31 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 91 words, total size 1 kb.
Oh Where Oh Where Are The Moderate Muslims?
They are not hiding here in the stove! No really guys where are you?
Instapundit : We need to make the moderates feel safer -- and the extremists much more nervous. That's why things like the pandering response to the Cartoon Wars by everyone from Borders to the Bush Administration, are exactly wrong. Plus, there's this:....
Posted by: Howie at
07:24 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 71 words, total size 1 kb.
Secretary of Defense on Iraq Anniversary

Donald H. Rumsfeld talks about what we have gained in the last three years. HeÂ’s not been fired yet so what the hell.
Secretary Rumsfeld Via Centcom :Some have described the situation in Iraq as a tightening noose, noting that "time is not on our side" and that "morale is down." Others have described a "very dangerous" turn of events and are "extremely concerned."
Who are they that have expressed these concerns? In fact, these are the exact words of terrorists discussing Iraq -- Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and his associates -- who are describing their own situation and must be watching with fear the progress that Iraq has made over the past three years.
The terrorists seem to recognize that they are losing in Iraq. I believe that history will show that to be the case.
Donald H. Rumsfeld
Posted by: Howie at
06:52 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 150 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You may be interested to know what Gen. Newbold had to say re: Mr. Rumsfeld:
He points the finger at Rumsfeld and says the planning "was done with a casualness and swagger that are the special province of those who have never had to execute these missions — or bury the results."
The "consequence ... was that a fundamentally flawed plan was executed for an invented war, while pursuing the real enemy, Al Qaeda, became a secondary effort."
=
beware wary of warplans when the only generals endorsing them are general electric and general dynamic.
Posted by: 8ackgr0und N015e at April 10, 2006 01:15 AM (K5Ko+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Brothers Kill Sister for "Honor"
(Lod, Israel) Nineteen-year-old Rim Abu Ganem, an Israeli Arab, was allegedly
choked to death by her brothers in an "honor killing." Rim had fallen in love with a Palestinian man who wasn't the family's choice for her mate. Shortly before she was murdered, police had warned that her life was in danger and referred her to a shelter. Tragically, Rim didn't heed the warning.
Rim's brother Suliman, a pediatrician at Assaf Harofeh Hospital, allegedly gave the other brothers an anesthetic to put her to sleep. While Rim dozed, they choked her. Rim's body was later found in a well.
The five brothers were arrested and they may actually face legal consequences since the crime was committed in Israel. I hope so. More here.
From Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
05:36 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 135 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Here's where some Liberal says honor killing isn't in the Koran.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at April 09, 2006 07:10 PM (8e/V4)
2
Thanks for the link, most kind of you.
Posted by: AbbaGav at April 09, 2006 11:09 PM (eiYHi)
3
Easiest way to curb these honor killings, make an example of these loving brothers, firing squad for each of them, followed up burning the body in pig fat.
I'll bet the practice of Honour Killings will vanish into the dustbin of history very quickly.
Posted by: MathewK at April 10, 2006 12:10 AM (pVHqF)
4
I suspect that honor killings are being committed much more often than is being reported and, if the public knew the actual frequency and scope of the practice, there would be general outrage.
Posted by: Mike at April 10, 2006 07:15 AM (Kjxf6)
5
Mike, I doubt whether the public could work itself up to an outrage about anything. If there is no outrage over the beheadings and suicide bombings in the ME, I doubt whether these honor killings will even raise an eyebrow with the cable-TV set.
Posted by: jesusland joe at April 10, 2006 08:33 AM (rUyw4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 08, 2006
9 April 2003

Gratitude:
World opinion says that this war was illegal because the Coalition found no weapons of mass destruction. What have been found, however, are heaps of bodies, buried in mass graves, which would not have been discovered otherwise. Five-hundred thousand people — men, women and children — had been executed or buried alive. Saddam Hussein and many of his henchmen were captured alive and, in contrast to the way they treated people, are being treated humanely. Saddam Hussein's 35-year war against the population of Iraq cost over two million people their lives, and this campaign is not over yet. Now, however, we are no longer alone in this war. We have the United States on our side. We know that we can win this struggle.
Posted by: Vinnie at
11:54 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 131 words, total size 1 kb.
1
World opinion be damned!
Posted by: Rod Stanton at April 09, 2006 03:10 AM (NX6Xx)
2
your blogroll is overlapping your post on the right side and people can't read the post.
sorry I tired to ppost there and couldn't.
http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/063369.php
Posted by: sam at April 09, 2006 05:17 AM (dNYpA)
3
That's right Rod; damn them all. World opinion just shows that the vast majority of people are willing to put up with any amount of suffering in the name of peace, as long as it's someone else who is doing the suffering.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 09, 2006 06:52 AM (0yYS2)
4
Developing resource: Prewardocs New Evidence
>>March 17, 2001____Saddam Targeted American Assets For Terrorism:
>>Saddam Hussein's regime was planning suicide attacks on U.S. interests six months before 9-11
>>Hans Blix presented a report called, Unresolved Disarmament Issues. For those who don't trust or believe the Bush Administration's claims about WMD, this report is a much better description of the alleged threat that Saddam's Regime posed.
Much more: Videos, audios, transcripts, orders, reciepts, memos, thousands upon thousands of records to come..
Posted by: Rubin at April 09, 2006 07:17 AM (NJCwf)
5
The whole world depents too much on the same reptiles that runs the New York Sewer
Posted by: sandpiper at April 09, 2006 12:42 PM (XGDTE)
6
OK, IM summed that up better than I could. excellent.
Posted by: davec at April 09, 2006 03:51 PM (CcXvt)
7
And IM and davec, I'm ashamed to say that the majority of Americans fit into that same category. Rather than "Give me liberty or death", the new motto in America is "Give me cable-tv or People magazine". Disgusting!
Posted by: jesusland joe at April 09, 2006 09:33 PM (rUyw4)
8
I have always hated that picture. Da da da da daaaaa "we have saved the day again!!!!"
Its amazing how much money our government will spend a day in another country for "humanitarian" reasons when it struggles to meet the needs of our own. Are the foreigners we are trying to keep out more important that the citizens that are here and under the flag?
Posted by: Hill-billy bob at April 10, 2006 06:51 AM (vx4R9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Use of Tactical Nukes Considered Against Iran
From the
Telegraph:
The Bush administration is planning to use nuclear weapons against Iran, to prevent it acquiring its own atomic warheads, claims an investigative writer with high-level Pentagon and intelligence contacts.
The
Telegraph is referring to this
article by Seymour Hersh in The New Yorker. Unnamed sources quoted by Hersh say that the Iranian nuclear facilities are dug in too deep to be taken out with bunker busters using conventional explosives.
The Iranian nuclear program must be taken out, and if the vicious current regime goes with it, so much the better. The risk, not only of the mad mullahs using nuclear weapons, but of their providing them to one of the terrorist groups they sponsor is too great. If it takes tactical nuclear weapons to accomplish the destruction of the Iranian nuclear threat, so be it.
Via Signal 94 and Stop the ACLU.
Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.
Posted by: Bluto at
11:29 PM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 169 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I think I read this in the American Conservative last summer. Why is anybody surprised? I'm only surprised the Iranian threat has been allowed to drag out this long.
Posted by: Homeland Stupidity at April 09, 2006 12:02 AM (FVbj6)
2
Seymour Hersh is a Leftwing tabloid journalist. Take anything he says with a grain of salt.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at April 09, 2006 12:41 AM (8e/V4)
3
Why limit it to tactical nukes? The
Teheran Memorial Glowing Glassworks would make a fitting object lesson for the rest of the third-world subhumans who think they can tweak the tiger's tail.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 09, 2006 06:54 AM (0yYS2)
4
Well, things are going so well in Iraq we have plenty of troops to deal with 100 million pissed off Irans and 1.5 angry, murderous Muslims around the world--some of whom have nukes of their own. Good plan, guys.
Posted by: Voice of Reason at April 09, 2006 07:43 AM (LNSpI)
5
Make that 100 million pissed off Iranians and 1.5 billion angry, murderous Muslims.
Posted by: Voice of Reason at April 09, 2006 07:46 AM (LNSpI)
6
I dunno. Bad idea I think.
Posted by: Howie at April 09, 2006 08:05 AM (D3+20)
7
So the concensus is for more cowardly appeasement and permissiveness then? Anyone who is not willing to fight an enemy who has openly vowed to destroy them is a gutless coward.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 09, 2006 09:39 AM (0yYS2)
8
>>>>Anyone who is not willing to fight an enemy who has openly vowed to destroy them is a gutless coward.
lol! Fighting the enemy is good, but not with nukes.
Nukes should be reserved for MADD, nothing more.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at April 09, 2006 11:47 AM (8e/V4)
9
Nukes are our only option. Furthermore if we do not eradicate a minimum of 80% of the iranian population they will continue to pose a grave threat to the United States and world population.
No mercy for the wicked.
Posted by: The Vicious Truth at April 09, 2006 02:24 PM (y+196)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at April 09, 2006 02:34 PM (8e/V4)
11
You do realise they're talking about bunker busters with a nuclear warhead that is used to destroy fortified bunkers buried deep in the ground, that cannot be destroyed with the conventional bunker busters explosive warhead.
They're not talking about Nagasaki here.
Posted by: davec at April 09, 2006 03:56 PM (CcXvt)
12
Dave yes but people won't make that distinction I'm afraid. The goal I heard today was the change the govt. Now if that happens we have to hold out for unconditional surrender. tough in the short run on everyone but when it's over it's over. I'm afrid we can't say we are going small to lessen the motivation of an insurgency. No there
will be one and you had better not let it have room to breath. That being said we are in a long war have to think about pace so we have some left at the end. Balance that with no draft and the politics.
Posted by: Howie at April 09, 2006 08:44 PM (D3+20)
13
Part of me thinks Bush spent all his capital in Iraq, but then the other says -- well he isn't running for re-election.
He said he would not allow Iran to have Nuclear weapons, I think we can take that at face value, at what he is willing to do to stop it.
Posted by: davec at April 09, 2006 09:16 PM (CcXvt)
14
But Nagasaki and Hiroshima worked so well.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 09, 2006 10:36 PM (0yYS2)
15
Improb.. LOL.. I love your posts. I tend to think along the same lines. I think I come across as extreme sometimes, but it's an extreme world we're living in and I have no problem with extreme measures to put the sociopaths in their place. The very idea of the Tehran Memorial Glowing Glassworks is hysterical! Of course, some think I've got a bit of a twisted sense of humor.. go figure.
Posted by: Richard at April 09, 2006 11:00 PM (7KF8r)
16
Thanks Richard; it's good to be appreciated.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 10, 2006 06:28 PM (0yYS2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
"Divorce Court" Judge Plays Race Card
It seems that playing the race card is just as popular as always. This week we had Cynthia McKinney and now Mablean.
Mablean Ephriam, television's "Divorce Court" judge, claims her firing by FOX was because of racial and ethnic issues. FOX stated that Ephriam wanted too much money and reportedly turned down a contract for $2 million a year.
Since FOX replaced Ephriam with ex-Ohio Judge Lynn Toler, also an African-American, her racism charge seems baseless. I suggest that she try claiming FOX is sexist.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
06:46 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 97 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Nobody believes these bogus racism charges anymore. Ignore the stupid biatches. People like them is why I'm not a Liberal anymore.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at April 09, 2006 12:17 AM (8e/V4)
2
A**holes, idiots and fools come in all colors, but you sure can't convince some people of that. Makes you wonder if it's self-loathing or an unusually high regard for themselves that makes them think others can't see past their skin color.
She'll find a lawyer who'll gleefully use it to sue on her behalf. Anything for a buck.
Posted by: Oyster at April 09, 2006 04:07 AM (YudAC)
3
I think they've played this hand plumb out. It's time for a new deal.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 09, 2006 06:55 AM (0yYS2)
4
Once again, the free market systen has spoken. Ephraim thought her services to Fox were worth more than 2 million a year. She was mistaken.
Posted by: Nightfighter at April 09, 2006 11:28 AM (k/2Hv)
5
More of the usial lies by the liberal minority fools i guess their loking for JESSIE JACKASSON to get involved
Posted by: sandpiper at April 09, 2006 12:44 PM (XGDTE)
6
As a presumed impartial, objective judge in the legal system, Mablean sure whipped out the race card with lightning speed. As such, one might believe that some of her judicial opinions were biased.
Posted by: Mike at April 09, 2006 05:17 PM (Kjxf6)
7
Mike, that's probably why she's just a TV judge.
Posted by: Oyster at April 10, 2006 05:40 AM (YudAC)
8
While I agree that the race card is used as the trump far too often, in this case I have to agree. Check out this article< http://eurweb.com/story/eur25782.cfm, for the complete story of what she said at the press conference. Often times, editorial "decisions” don’t allow for the full story to be told. I have searched the net and seen way to many versions of the same story where only one part of what the judge said during her conference was quoted. Her complete explanation, which breaks down her reasoning behind the accusation, was left out in almost every article I found.
In regard to Judge Toler being black, I wonder if she is fair skinned with good hair. Like it or not racism and intra-racism in the black community still exists. In our history, you once had the brown paper bag test. If you were darker that the paper bag and had curly - "nappy"- hair, you were considered less than other members of your race. And, although Jim Crow law refered to everyone with a drop of black blood as a n***a, if a choice was to be made of selecting one black over the other, the one with the fairer skin would be selected, unless of course it was field work.
I wrote all this to point out that the racism Judge Ephram described is still alive today and it is reflected in the unequal pay and ridiculous requests made by Fox as described by the judge in an article reporting the full story.
Ayana
Posted by: Ayana at April 10, 2006 06:33 AM (p2vSu)
9
If you've never been discriminated against you certainly would feel that the race card no longer has basis. Although some may abuse it please know that racism in America is still alive.
Posted by: Jay at May 03, 2006 10:09 AM (Qa0Pn)
10
If you have never been a victim of racism, if you you are not a "person of color," certainly you find it difficult to believe in the existence or reality of racism. If you could only walk in "our" shoes, you WOULD understand.
Posted by: ME at May 10, 2006 03:05 PM (b7xxK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Kurd Tortured to Death by Syrian Army
We're often told by the media that it's the seriousness of the accusation that matters. If that is the case, how come there is no press coverage of the accusation that Syria routinely totures and kills their own Kurdish citizens?
A Kurdish website run out of Holland is reporting that 19 year old Mohammed Wayso was recently tortured to death by his commanders in the Syrian Army because he couldn't speak Arabic well enough. Syria is run by the Arab nationalist Ba'ath Party.
The Kurdish political party in Syria, Yeketi, claims that at least 5 others Kurds have been tortured to death in Syria in the past two years because of their ethnic identity.
You can see a translation of the Azady story here (warning: graphic images). More images of the murdered Kurd here (graphic)
Posted by: Rusty at
11:54 AM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 149 words, total size 1 kb.
1
So wheres AMESTY INTERNATIONAL where the usial liberal wussies where the usial birdcage linners that are always making comments?
Posted by: sandpiper at April 08, 2006 01:40 PM (qMAo+)
2
Horrible news. A Kurds serves in the Syrian army and is killed by Syrian troops. Horrible.
Posted by: pka at April 08, 2006 03:07 PM (UA1kS)
3
Sandpiper here is the link to the Amnesty International webpage devoted exclusively to Syria. I found it by googling Amnesty Internatioal Syria. There most recent item was April 3rd.
Posted by: john Ryan at April 08, 2006 03:08 PM (TcoRJ)
4
http://www.amnestyusa.org/countries/syria/news.do AMNESTY INTERNATIONA SYRIA
Posted by: john Ryan at April 08, 2006 03:10 PM (TcoRJ)
5
Arab nationalists? Barbarians?
I totally didn't know.
Anyway, yes,
the entire middle east is run and populated by barbarians*. This is not news. Scan some news items for Africa some time - ho-hum and other comments.
The silly part that nobody realizes is that even dictatorships do not govern without the consent of the governed. Through a combination of force, fear and moralistic stances, the powers-that-be in Arabia have gotten the
de facto consent of the (vast?) majority of the arab population.
Yes, the choice is to leave the country, rebel or give your support (through tax dollars, or just contributing to the economy, or whatever) to the government. The plain fact of the matter is this kind of stuff cannot (currently) happen in the USA - the people here would not tolerate it.
Now, ask yourself this: if these people are more than willing to submit to dictatorships, whats preventing them from just voting in next week's flavor of islamism or arab nationalism into dictatorial power?
But democracy is democracy, right?
*There are exceptions. Most of them reside in the US or are getting here as quickly as possible.
Posted by: MiB at April 08, 2006 03:26 PM (2hPsb)
6
Yes but ABU GHRAIB! GUANTANAMO! DOMESTIC WIRETAPPING! DICK CHENEY SHOT SOMEONE!!!
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 08, 2006 03:35 PM (0yYS2)
7
Dick Chaney shot someone? Are you sure, IM?
Posted by: jesusland joe at April 08, 2006 07:55 PM (rUyw4)
8
Well done, John Ryan. Nice to see facts introduced to counter rhetoric. Anyone that knows anything about Amnesty knows that they would be on Syria like white on rice. Just because they don't always support violent overthrows of government doesn't mean they don't criticize those governments. And just because they criticize our human rights abuses doesn't mean they are blind to Syria's.
As for this unfortunate Kurd: the Kurdish people's dream for a Kurdistan is one of the great unsolved problems of the region. It was the same at Versailles. They are, along with the Palestinians, one of the largest stateless ethnic groups in the world--and they have a much more distinctive "nation" than the Palestinians. Yet, in their own "kurdistan" of N. Iraq, they are behaving with increasing brutality and authoritarianism. Meanwhile Kurdish extremism is on the rise again in Eastern Turkey. When Iraq falls into a bigger civil war, I think Kurdistan goes up in flames. This has security implications for Turkey, Iran, and Syria...won't be pretty.
Posted by: jd at April 08, 2006 07:56 PM (uT71O)
9
just because they don't always support violent overthrows of government doesn't mean they don't criticize those governments.
Yes, just imagine how many world problems have been resolved by criticizing Governments, with strongly worded letters, or scathing speeches in front of a microphone, I hear Iran trembles when Kofi gets out his pen.
Posted by: davec at April 09, 2006 12:02 AM (CcXvt)
10
"The silly part that nobody realizes is that even dictatorships do not govern without the consent of the governed."
Uh, royal families that inherit thrones without a vote? Fraud at the polls? Military coups? I wouldn't call that "consent".
Posted by: Oyster at April 09, 2006 04:19 AM (YudAC)
11
So JD, you support the brutal repression of the Kurds then?
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 09, 2006 07:05 AM (0yYS2)
12
No, IM, I don't. In a perfect world, the colonial powers would have carved a Kurdistan out of the collapsing Ottaman empire at Versailles, or in the upheaval of British departure from Iraq. Now, the millions of Kurds are spread out among Iraq, Turkey, Iran, and Syria (fewest in Syria, incidentally). They deserve to live under governments that allow them to speak their unique language and practice their unique culture. I've met many Kurds in my time, and I respect their aspirations for freedom. In fact, when I was in Istanbul, I really pissed off some Turkish friends by pressing too hard for Kurdish freedoms.
But what is the solution? Kurds want to take land from all four of those nations. The maps of Kurdistan they fly in N. Iraq are not just Iraqi Kurdistan. They include huge chunks of each of those nations, as well as Kirkuk and Mosul, cities in Iraq with large Turkomen or Arab populations.
We, the US, have fucked over the Kurds several times, abandoned them in 73 and then again in 85, when we deepened our relations with Saddam, and then again in 91, when we encouraged a revolt and then stood back (although we eventually did hte right thing). But what is the right policy on Kurdish aspirations? I have some ideas. What do you think?
Posted by: jd at April 09, 2006 08:38 AM (uT71O)
13
"Uh, royal families that inherit thrones without a vote? Fraud at the polls? Military coups? I wouldn't call that "consent"."
If you do not rebel or leave, you are consenting to live under their rule. The choice is certainly less easy than casting a ballot - indeed, it often entails putting your life in danger - but that is certainly no excuse to passively accept a despot.
There are no "innocent civilians" in Iraq. They
all contributed their share to the problem - in fact, their own cowardice and complacency is the reason that we're there in the first place.
Similarly, there are no "innocent civilians" in any other mideast dictatorship. Bush ought to remember that these people have all chosen that silent suffering under a dictator is better than standing up for freedom, the next time he tries to pass around his nonsense about how democracy will make everything better.
Posted by: MiB at April 09, 2006 08:46 AM (2hPsb)
14
This is very interesting, MiB. I agree that even the most brutal dictatorship relies on the submission and consent of the governed. This goes back to Hobbes. But I must say that there are innocent civilians in Iraq and throughout the Arab world. Here are some examples:
1. Those who were not yet adults when Saddam fell (A large percentage of the population, incidentally). You can't ask a 15 year old to understand that rebellion is the only option, when every adult he knows tells him that those who rebel against Saddam end up getting their parents and family killed.
2. Those who were living in our no-fly zones from 92-2003. They had no reason to rebel, since they were not under Saddam's direct control anymore. This is particularly true in the North, since it was the great dream of Kurdish nationalism to establish their own (unfortunately corrupt and authoritarian) regimes.
3. Those who were, in fact, rebelling against Saddam. There were many domestic opponents of his regime, who lost tongues, ears, limbs, and yet lived. Surely they are "innocent" by your definition.
Call it 20-30% of the population. That's a lot of innocents, millions of them.
Finally--I myself am not so quick to judge those living under one of the world's most brutal dictatorships. It would be nice to think that we would all be Patrick Henry's, bravely saying "give me liberty or give me death". But at the cost of seeing your mother raped and killed in front of you? Then your daughter? Then your son? While electrodes are put on your genitals? It's easy for us, in the US, where liberty has not been seriously under threat in that fashion EVER, unless one were black in the age of slavery or Jim Crow, to criticize them for not resisting. But I just don't know, sitting amid easy wealth and freedom, that I would possess that kind of heroic courage.
Posted by: jd at April 09, 2006 09:19 AM (uT71O)
15
Mib:
You did hear that the Iraq desert is full of mass graves of 'dissidents' who did rebel in some form or other right? some of them didn't even pick up a weapon and had themselves and their immediate family wiped from the genepool.
To sit back and say that if you didn't try and fight Saddam's regime they're all cowards is an arrogant point of view.
Posted by: davec at April 09, 2006 04:22 PM (CcXvt)
16
I think his point, such as it is, is that the living ones are cowards, and only the dead had courage. Surviving Saddam is prove of pusillanimity.
Posted by: Jd at April 09, 2006 05:26 PM (uT71O)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Shame on the Blogosphere for Jill Carroll Reaction
Last word on Jill Carroll kidnapping.
Jeff Jacoby:
To some people hearing this, it was plain that Carroll could only have been speaking under duress. "Jill Carroll forced to make propaganda video as price of freedom," the Monitor headlined its story the next day. Anyone tempted to accuse Carroll of some other motive, cautioned Ellen Knickmeyer of The Washington Post, "should think about what they would do (after) three months with machine guns held to their heads."
What did I say about it? I hate to quote myself, but:
In it Jill Carroll seems more than eager to give the 'correct' answers asked by her captors. It's quite sickening some of the answers she gives, but understandable under the circumstances. But, before you accuse Jill of being a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, keep in mind that she was under duress....
Very scripted, very much what you would expect the terrorists wanted to hear.
And here:
What would you say to your captors after months as a prisoner? You'd tell them exactly what they want to hear. Remember, the only video we have of Jill Carroll are two segments taped while she was still a prisoner--under a considerable amount of duress. The second video we have is one taped in the offices of The Islamic Party of Iraq--the political front for the same terrorists who had victimized her!
Which Jill Carroll confirmed here:
"During my last night in captivity, my captors forced me to participate in a propaganda video. They told me I would be released if I cooperated. I was living in a threatening environment, under their control, and wanted to go home alive. So I agreed," she said in a statement read by her editor in Boston.
"Things that I was forced to say while captive are now being taken by some as an accurate reflection of my personal views. They are not."... ...In the statement, Carroll also disavowed an interview she gave to the party shortly after her release. She said the party had promised her the interview would not be aired "and broke their word."... ..."At any rate, fearing retribution from my captors, I did not speak freely. Out of fear, I said I wasn't threatened. In fact, I was threatened many times," she said. "Also, at least two false statements about me have been widely aired: One — that I refused to travel and cooperate with the U.S. military, and two — that I refused to discuss my captivity with U.S. officials. Again, neither statement is true."
Jill Carroll was the
victim here, and the class which she showed upon her release should put many to shame. Unlike Giuliana Sgrena, she has so far refused to use her personal ordeal to push her political agenda and has forcefully spoken out against the barbarians who held her hostage!
Jim Geraghty also chimes in against both the Right and Left, but since we've already discussed the Right's reaction:
There was much ugliness on the right, but there was plenty of the same nastiness to go around on the left. Shortly after her initial remarks, John Podhoretz predicted on National Review Online's group blog The Corner that there would be a lot of talk about Stockholm Syndrome. Shortly thereafter, a contributor to the liberal blog ThinkProgress demanded an apology (presumptuously speaking for Carroll) and other commenters on that site wished for Podhoretz to get kidnapped himself, labeling him a "Reichwingnut" and so on.
No matter how much you may disagree with a network anchor, reporter or columnist, it's unheard of for a professional writer to say in published work, "I hope that guy gets kidnapped." Even on his worst day, it's unimaginable that Rather (or Bob Schieffer, or any new anchor) would label, on-air an opponent a "Reichwingnut." (Okay, maybe Bryant Gumbel. But when he called Robert Knight "a ****ing idiot," he at least thought he was off the air. ) Nor is any columnist likely to speculate in print that abducted prisoners are in cahoots with their captors, at least without evidence....
The Pajamahadeen have gone from fact-checking Dan Rather to speculating that Jill Carroll faked her tears on her hostage tape. This is not progress.
No it is not.
Posted by: Rusty at
09:19 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 711 words, total size 5 kb.
1
Bullshit. She's no different now than she was before or during her captivity, except that maybe she realizes that she's been caught. She should be deported back to whatever middle eastern hellhole will have her.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 08, 2006 09:24 AM (0yYS2)
2
IM,
Jill Carroll may be a moonbat at heart, but she has dissavowed the statements she made under duress, and that's enough for me.
There's plenty of things the moonbats say of their own volition without us having to pick on them for the things they didn't say of their own volition.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at April 08, 2006 09:27 AM (8e/V4)
3
I agree, Carlos. From the way the moonbats were reacting to her over at DU and Kos, it seems that she's getting it just as hard from them. (She's a CIA plant, blah, blah, blah...)
Another factor that makes me lean toward believing the duress angle was that it's got be harder to be a female hostage, given Muslim attitudes on raping the infidel.
Posted by: Lonevoice at April 08, 2006 09:51 AM (V3Smz)
4
Tell that to Debbie Schlussel, who is still trashing Carroll.
Posted by: rightwingprof at April 08, 2006 11:24 AM (hj1Wx)
5
Tell it to me, who's still trashing Debbie Schlussel for trashing Jill Carroll
:-)
Posted by: Vinnie at April 08, 2006 11:49 AM (/qy9A)
6
I don't care about her recanting her statements made under duress, I want her to recant herself on everything before she climbed in bed with the enemy. She is a traitor in word, thought, and deed.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 08, 2006 03:37 PM (0yYS2)
7
>>>>I want her to recant herself on everything before she climbed in bed with the enemy. She is a traitor in word, thought, and deed.
On that part we do agree.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at April 08, 2006 04:31 PM (8e/V4)
8
none of you know. none of you have a clue. go and watch the final moments of mr berg with his captors. while that's fresh in your memory tell us all about what caroll should or should not have done.
Posted by: darryl at April 08, 2006 06:31 PM (PL/5X)
9
Jill Caroll deliberately placed herself in harms way. Her abject stupitity cost her driver his life and made her a useful tool of the enemy.
She was / is a featherheaded idiot / idealist that went out to coddle the enemy and got raped and used for doing it.
She was cindy sheephand with journalist credentials.
I'm glad I raised kids that aren't that stupid.
Should I feel sorry for her or should I just pray we wake up, get some common sense and testicles and Nuke the camel fuckers before more jill carrolls have their way with the hearts and minds of my peers and our childrens peers?
Fight islam Now
Posted by: Fight islam Now at April 08, 2006 06:56 PM (/sF8v)
10
I must agree with Dr. Shackleford on this one. I'm just not gonna second-guess what anyone did with a gun to her head. Would I break down under those circumstances? Probably. Does that make me a coward? Maybe it does, but probably not anymore so than your average blogger.
Posted by: Ragnar Danneskjold at April 08, 2006 08:01 PM (sg325)
11
Yes but how did she end up with a gun to her head in the first place? She was looking for a story to make her country look bad, and sided with the enemy to do so. She's a traitor, so I say damn her, and it's too bad she didn't get the chop.
Are there really so many people who are automatically willing to give treason a pass just because the traitor got doublecrossed? You'll all make good dhimmis.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 09, 2006 07:03 AM (0yYS2)
12
She was looking for a story. Reporters like stories with angle and flash, even reporters from the the CS Monitor. People blame hotel reporters and embedded reporters for sequestering themselves in a biased environment. She did what she believe to be right. She may be naive, but she is not evil. She was abused by evil people. Americans are allowed to hold any opinion they want without being treated as traitors, as long as they are loyal to the country. There is no reason to believe she was selling state secrets or arranging for the ambush of American soldiers.
Posted by: jj mollo at April 10, 2006 12:23 PM (3/hbN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
King of Nepal Orders Protesters Shot on Site
One of the stories being widely circulated right now is that the King of Nepal has ordered that protesters would be shot on site. What the headline does not say, is that Nepal is in the midsts of a civil war with Maoist rebels. And that no protesters have, in fact, been shot on site!
Guardian:
Protesters demanding a return to democracy postponed a rally that had been expected to draw thousands on Saturday, after the king imposed an all-day curfew and ordered violators shot on sight.
One person was killed and at least two wounded when security forces fired at demonstrators in Pokhara, a resort town 125 miles west of the capital, Katmandu, said Gangadhar Baral, who was among those wounded.
"We were protesting and some of us were throwing stones at the soldiers. Suddenly, the soldiers fired shots at us. One of my friends was killed instantly,'' Baral said. He spoke from the town's main hospital.
Wait a minute...you were throwing stones? What exactly did you think the response of the soldiers would be? Throw stones back?
And why the imposition of the restrictions?
The rebels bombed government buildings and attacked a jail in the southwestern town of Taulihawa on Friday night, freeing 104 prisoners, officials said. Insurgents also attacked security bases in the nearby town of Butwal.
Officials said the curfew was in response to information that the rebels would try to infiltrate the rallies and wage terror attacks against government targets.
I don't have enough information to make a judgement whether of not the King of Nepal was justified in overthrowing the government there--my gut feeling is that he didn't--but since when have Maoists ever respected democracy? Overthrowing a pro-Western King and replacing him with an anti-Western Maoist dictator is never a good move.
Impending geek alert: Interestingly enough, last night's episode of Dr. Who featured a Prime Minister of England ordering the Doctor shot on site. Which is neither here nor there, but I just figured you ought to know a little about Macktastick Rusty Wicked's geek factor. It's off the scale.
Posted by: Rusty at
08:57 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 360 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Why shoot curfew violators? Why not just arrest them. If they resist, THEN shoot them.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at April 08, 2006 09:31 AM (8e/V4)
2
Shot on
sight... on
sight.
Please feel free to delete this comment. I'm pedantic.
Posted by: Russ at April 08, 2006 10:43 AM (utsLN)
3
Will AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL say anything with the UN get involved? im not holding my breath waiting
Posted by: sandpiper at April 08, 2006 01:48 PM (qMAo+)
4
Better question: Since when has maoism/communism been justified by any number of people wanting to commit collective suicide and taking everyone who disagrees with them?
Posted by: MiB at April 08, 2006 02:51 PM (2hPsb)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NASCAR Fatwa?
If
NASCAR gets a fatwa before me, I swear I'll sue!
Posted by: Rusty at
08:37 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Were did they put the "Death 2 Amerika" sticker?
Posted by: Cindy at April 08, 2006 09:22 AM (yaOey)
2
Wring the NBC peacocks neck more from DATELIES
Posted by: sandpiper at April 08, 2006 01:51 PM (qMAo+)
3
I've gotta say that the Dateline, Jyllands-Posten Taurus ran pretty good today. We were at little loose at the start of the run, but things tightened up real good at the end.
Posted by: Jim at April 08, 2006 03:30 PM (YkmII)
4
I'd like to see a show where they send a NASCAR fan through the NBC studios and see what kind of bigoted snickers he elicits from all the elitists there. If NBC was looking for bigotry they need not have looked any further than their own studios.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at April 08, 2006 04:35 PM (8e/V4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 07, 2006
US, EU Shut Off Money Tap to Palestinian Authority
As I pointed out
here after the Hamas election win, it is
illegal for the US to give aid to a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization.
From Reuters:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States and the European Commission suspended aid to the new Hamas-led Palestinian government on Friday, pushing the Palestinian Authority closer to financial collapse.
The State Department, making its announcement, said it would boost humanitarian aid to the Palestinians through U.N. agencies to avoid widespread distress in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, but the United States would not fund an organization committed to the destruction of Israel.
But surely, their Muslim brothers will rush in to fill the gap?
Hamas has appealed to Arab states and Iran to fill the shortfall, but has not even been able to find a bank willing to handle its finances.
Maybe because its chief (only) export is terrorism.
Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.
Posted by: Bluto at
10:58 PM
| Comments (24)
| Add Comment
Post contains 172 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Well it's about damn time. Now to start killing them.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 08, 2006 05:57 AM (0yYS2)
2
I've got some money for those heathens.........it's wrapped around a 20 kiloton nuclear warhead.
Posted by: n.a. palm at April 08, 2006 08:26 AM (eXs2X)
3
Much of that money will instead go to U.N. relief programs in the palestinian territories...which means the actual palestinians will see little of it themselves.
Hamas was elected by an overwhelming majority of the paleostinian people, proving that indeed the paleostinians never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at April 08, 2006 08:41 AM (8e/V4)
4
Good, though it took them long enough.
OT: looks like
aarons.cc got hacked
Posted by: RC at April 08, 2006 08:48 AM (PgcbG)
5
Screw the paleostinians. The only help they need is in the form of a nuclear missile to send them straight to hell. They are verminous animals and should be exterminated.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 08, 2006 09:25 AM (0yYS2)
6
Atheists are America's least trusted group, according to a national survey conducted by university sociology researchers. Based on a telephone survey of more than 2,000 households and in-depth interviews with more than 140 people, researchers found that Americans rate atheists below Muslims, recent immigrants, homosexuals and other groups as "sharing their vision of American society." Americans are also least willing to let their children marry athEISTS ..... The best way to understand the nature of atheism is to understand its author. Satan is its author.
It’s important to remain conscious of the fact that Satan had his origin in heaven, and is thoroughly familiar with the fact of the existence of God, heaven, the angels, hell and etc. Thus despite what you have been previously deceptively taught and despite the deceptive dictionary’s meaning of atheism, atheism is properly defined as a denial of the existence of God in the midst of full knowledge that the true God does indeed exist. Atheism knows God exists; it is quite familiar with that fact, but it says “under no circumstance or situation will I admit to God’s existence.”
Atheism clearly perceives the fingerprints of God on all of creation, but refuses to admit He is the Creator. Atheism perceives the divine authorship of the TEN COMMANDMENTS, but refuses to admit that God is their Author. Atheism perceives the decorousness and perfection of the TEN COMMANDMENTS, but refuses to admit they are superior to all other laws. Atheism clearly perceives the divinity of the Lord Jesus Christ, but refuses to admit His divinity. If an atheist could see the wounds in the body of Christ and actually feel them with his hands, he would deny that the wounds are there. Atheism is deliberate effort to never admit the existence of God.
Atheism is the ultimate of Satanism. Ask Satan does God exist and he will deny it. Ask him does Satan exist and he will deny his own existence even while in your presence. Atheism holds the Bible in one hand, but deny its existence by denying its truth with the other.
Posted by: The Dutch Guy at April 08, 2006 10:29 AM (zqsRN)
7
Maybe it's just me, but why is the US sending money to the PA?? Is there really NOTHING else for us to spend our tax dollars on? I never have understood this. Why would the US support in any way an entity that appears to be the mortal enemy of Israel? What did I miss?
Posted by: Richard at April 08, 2006 02:10 PM (7KF8r)
8
you missed your brains thats all!
Posted by: The Dutch Guy at April 08, 2006 02:25 PM (zqsRN)
9
Jews Avoid Paying Taxes
A report, "House Agrees to Extend Holocaust Tax Break" (Associated Press, June 5, 2002), states that a bill proposing yet another tax break for Jews passed the house by a vote of 392 to 1.
The following comes directly from the Internal Revenue Service web page, www.irs.gov, and quite frankly, it speaks for itself.
"Any restitution payments made to holocaust victims and their heirs are excluded from gross income. Therefore, taxpayers should not include these payments as income when filing Federal tax returns.
"A victim of the holocaust is anyone who was persecuted on the basis of race, religion, physical or mental disability or sexual orientation by Nazi Germany, any other Axis regime or any other Nazi-controlled or Nazi-allied country."
Did you hear that, America? More special privileges for Jews and homosexuals. Don't you just have to ask yourself the question - Why should Christ-hating Jews get special tax privileges when white Christian Americans don't? In the near future, the Jews will give themselves more special privileges to include special tax exemption and "restitution payments" if they have ever been "persecuted" by any Christian Church. Wouldn't it be great for the Jews to get several billion dollars a year from the Southern Baptists? Let's not forget the Catholics and those mean old Mormons.
You better stand up now, decent white man and woman.
Posted by: The Dutch Guy at April 08, 2006 02:28 PM (zqsRN)
10
U.S. Aid to Israel: What U.S. Taxpayer Should Know
This morning as I was walking down Shuhada Street in Hebron, I saw graffiti marking the newly painted storefronts and awnings. Although three months past schedule and 100 percent over budget, the renovation of Shuhada Street was finally completed this week. The project manager said the reason for the delay and cost overruns was the sabotage of the project by the Israeli settlers of the Beit Hadassah settlement complex in Hebron. They broke the street lights, stoned project workers, shot out the windows of bulldozers and other heavy equipment with pellet guns, broke paving stones before they were laid and now have defaced again the homes and shops of Palestinians with graffiti. The settlers did not want Shuhada St. opened to Palestinian traffic as was agreed to under Oslo 2. This renovation project is paid for by USAID funds and it makes me angry that my tax dollars have paid for improvements that have been destroyed by the settlers.
Most Americans are not aware how much of their tax revenue our government sends to Israel. For the fiscal year ending in September 30, 1997, the U.S. has given Israel $6.72 billion: $6.194 billion falls under Israel's foreign aid allotment and $526 million comes from agencies such as the Department of Commerce, the U.S. Information Agency and the Pentagon. The $6.72 billion figure does not include loan guarantees and annual compound interest totalling $3.122 billion the U.S. pays on money borrowed to give to Israel. It does not include the cost to U.S. taxpayers of IRS tax exemptions that donors can claim when they donate money to Israeli charities. (Donors claim approximately $1 billion in Federal tax deductions annually. This ultimately costs other U.S. tax payers $280 million to $390 million.)
When grant, loans, interest and tax deductions are added together for the fiscal year ending in September 30, 1997, our special relationship with Israel cost U.S. taxpayers over $10 billion.
Since 1949 the U.S. has given Israel a total of $83.205 billion. The interest costs borne by U.S. tax payers on behalf of Israel are $49.937 billion, thus making the total amount of aid given to Israel since 1949 $133.132 billion. This may mean that U.S. government has given more federal aid to the average Israeli citizen in a given year than it has given to the average American citizen.
I am angry when I see Israeli settlers from Hebron destroy improvements made to Shuhada Street with my tax money. Also, it angers me that my government is giving over $10 billion to a country that is more prosperous than most of the other countries in the world and uses much of its money for strengthening its military and the oppression of the Palestinian people.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by: The Dutch Guy at April 08, 2006 02:31 PM (zqsRN)
11
NOTE TO THE DUTCH GUY:
You may have noticed that I changed the "posted by" on all your posts to the same name. That's because I don't allow sock puppets or posers on my threads. If you want to play that way, go somewhere else.
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at April 08, 2006 03:07 PM (RHG+K)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 08, 2006 03:40 PM (0yYS2)
13
Wow, two genocidal maniacs in one post--Our neonazi dutch guy, and the guy who thinks ALL Palestinians should be annihilated like vermin. Even the toddlers and babies, my little Hitler-in-training? What a gem you are, IM, a sparkling example of humanity. You and Dutch guy should set up a competition to see who can eliminate more of the groups you hate.
I'm glad we aren't funding Hamas, as they are killers without remorse. But I do have a serious question. Now that they are in government, are they terrorists? Every definition of terrorism that the US uses that I've seen has "non-state" actor in it. This is how things like mining Nicaraguan civilian harbors don't count as terrorism. They can be state sponsors of terrorism, for sure. But if a government commits an act of violence against civilians of another country...that's war, not terrorism. Right?
Of course, we could avoid this for some time by saying that there is no Palestinian state, just an embryonic authority.
And to answer the question--we have been funding the PA since its formation, in the hopes (perhaps vain ones) that it would contribute to peace emerging. We spend upwards of 3 billion a year for aid to Israel, about 2 billion and change to Egypt, and a nice chunk (used to be a billion, but it is down now) to Jordan, along with about 500k (?) to the PA in the hope that if we pay enough, the four of them can be bribed not to kill each other. If, someday, peace comes, think of the cost savings! But more seriously, the poverty under the PA is unbelievable, and without foreign aid, there would be a vast humanitarian crisis. A Somalia, next to a strategic ally.
Posted by: jd at April 08, 2006 07:48 PM (uT71O)
14
Yesterday, it was reported, "US freezes aid to Palestinian government."
If only, look closely at the statement from the State Department - "while increasing humanitarian aid to the Palestinians through U.N. agencies."
Thursday, Abdul had to worry about beans OR bullets. Thanks to those compassionate conservatives, now he only has to worry about bullets. Sweet.
How clever was this of Dr. Rice, and on a Friday afternoon. Not just another pretty face.
Posted by: allen at April 08, 2006 10:58 PM (n8vUh)
15
JD, you're either with civilization or with the islam, and all mulsims are enemies of civilizations. We must exterminate them or they will destroy us.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 09, 2006 07:08 AM (0yYS2)
16
Maybe it's just me, but why is the US sending money to the PA??
Because we're sappy dumbasses.
People need to understand the consequences of their actions. The Palestinians are about to get a dose of hard financial reality.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 09, 2006 08:33 AM (l6Jdw)
17
Uh, IM--you do realize that the vast majority of Kurds are Muslims? The people you are defending on the other thread are the ones you want to genocidally eliminate here.
I'm not one of those liberals that looks on with happy smiles at Islam, and imagines that there are not huge problems with even moderate Islamists. At the same time, it is worth noting that prior to the Renaissance, it was a better deal to be a Jew in most Islamic cities than it was to be a Jew in the West. We underwent a historic shift in our views of the intersection between temporal and religious authorities, our views on the rights of individuals. The Islamic world is in desperate need for such a reformation. What is needed is not a war on Islam, a war of extermination like you propose. What is needed is a war within Islam, a war sometimes fought with bullets and bombs, and sometimes fought with words and ideas. In that war, given our current image, we will sometimes hurt the side we want to win by allying too closely with it. But with deft actions, we can assist Islam to come into the 21st century.
Are you really serious that all Muslims must be killed? I'd like to think you are just being bombastic and extreme for effect.
Posted by: jd at April 09, 2006 08:42 AM (uT71O)
18
How are the Kurds our unconditional allies that we should trust them? They are allies of convenience, nothing more. As long as one muslim lives, civilization is threatened.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 09, 2006 09:47 AM (0yYS2)
19
I'll take that as a yes to the question of whether you support genocide against the Muslims. I can't tell you how sick I think that idea is. Islamic civilization has produced many things of beauty and utility. Read the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam sometime. Many works of Islamic literature have inspired writers in the west and elsewhere. Islamic jurisprudence was influential on many Talmudic scholars when Islam was far more open to Jewish discourse than anywhere in the West. Islam for centuries best-preserved the learnings of the greeks. And there is great humanity in Islam, amid the activities you and I both abhor. Read Bernard Lewis for a neo-con account of the good, great, and awful in Islam. There have been architectural and scientific contributions as well.
But more importantly, even without all those contributions, advocating genocide is morally repugnant. I cannot think of a worse thing to advocate. It is Hitlerian in its moral outlook. You are the mirror image of bin Laden, although even he does not go as far as you. He has not called for the killing of Christians and Jews all over the world. That sick bastard wants to kill us until he can set up his caliphate, but he doesn't want to kill us in New Jersey after that happens. You, apparently, want to kill all Muslims, everywhere. That makes you worse than bin Laden...congratulations!
Posted by: jd at April 09, 2006 10:16 AM (uT71O)
20
For example: Muslims saved my ex-girlfriend's family in 1991. They were going to be killed by Saddam, trapped in the invasion of Kuwait. They disguised themselves, and fled north. Only with the assistance of Kurds did they make it Turkey. The Kurds refused payment, saying it was a religious obligation to aid the persecuted. Islam is not the monster you make it out to be. It is a religion in need of a reformation, not in need of genocidal eradication.
Posted by: jd at April 09, 2006 10:19 AM (uT71O)
21
I agree with jd on the point of a Muslim Reformation being preferable to a war of extermination against Islam.
And the way to bring about that Reformation is...exactly what we have been doing; promoting liberal (in the classical sense) democracy in the Middle East so that Fundamentalist regimes suffer by comparison.
More has been accomplished in the past four years of active engagement than in the past forty of misguided
laissez-faire and realpolitik non-action.
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at April 09, 2006 10:59 AM (RHG+K)
22
"Now that they are in government, are they terrorists? Every definition of terrorism that the US uses that I've seen has "non-state" actor in it." Yes, they're still terrorists. Palestine is not a state.
Posted by: Oyster at April 10, 2006 06:01 AM (YudAC)
23
I can't believe it, my co-worker just bought a car for $11703. Isn't that crazy!
Posted by: Betsy Markum at May 31, 2006 10:22 AM (o1lEG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Helicopter Pilot Video(Updated)
In a cheap attempt to break our will the enemy in Iraq has attempted to copycat the Somalia incident that broke Bill ClintonÂ’s will. The US military has called the video despicable. Our thoughts and prayers go to our fine pilot and his family.
CNN : "We are outraged that anyone would create and publish such a despicable video for public exposure," military spokesman Lt. Col. Jonathan Withington said in a statement. "The terrorists continue to demonstrate their immoral disregard for human dignity and life."
The U.S. military reported Sunday that an Army AH-64D Apache Longbow helicopter went down, likely from enemy fire, west of Yousifiah on Saturday evening while conducting a combat air patrol.
The video shows what appears to be a helicopter ablaze -- and later with no flames -- and insurgents dragging what appears to be "part of" a burning body away from the wreckage.
Hat Tip : Bareknucklepolitics for the video (
available here). I (
that's me Howie) have a copy and will send by email request at the address on the contacts page. ER uh I would if could my email clients all refuse to send a file that large.
Update : Al emails to question the last part of clip that shows the body. It's not very clear exactly what it is. Possibly a dummy? Right above the belt where the hips meet the waist it does not look quite right to me either.
Update II : Darcey also is hosting the Video here and a Hat Tip too for the frame grabs below the fold.
Update III 04/07/06 Hat Tip Infovlad: I saw this over at MSNBC today .
Military analysts have authenticated the terrorist videotape released this week that militants said showed the burning wreckage of an Apache helicopter and the body of a U.S. Army pilot being dragged, U.S. military officials have told NBC News.
So IÂ’m not sure, real or really staged? I'm not convinced that this is a body I suppose it could be, but I thought I had seen fire that behaved like that before. Just burns on and on, smoking and never consuming anything.
Reminds me of this video on Infovlad.net. You can find
VladÂ’s entry here and scroll till you see the Feb 15th entry
Vlad : Recipe of flammable liquid? Whose logo is this? The video looks bit old though.
The fire in the new Video looks very similar to VladÂ’s entry. Just thought I'd expose their little magic trick.
more...
Posted by: Howie at
10:27 PM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
Post contains 559 words, total size 5 kb.
1
The military may feel compelled to make such a response knowing the media will show it but there really is no shock, to me. It is disgusting but what's new? I don't know of any people throughout history who've proven more creative, time and again at being despicable. They have absolutely no conscience.
Posted by: Javapuke at April 05, 2006 11:39 AM (MhOES)
2
The video is a sign of weakness and desperation.
Posted by: Venom at April 05, 2006 12:13 PM (dbxVM)
Posted by: jac at April 05, 2006 01:17 PM (29GlF)
4
My respects to the fallen Americans, and their families.
Today brings us another example of what we are up against. We give them Gitmo with three hots, and a cot. While our dead get the treatment. Moon god worship is the greastest trick Satan has ever pulled. But, it is the religion of peace.
ROPMA
Posted by: Leatherneck at April 05, 2006 04:22 PM (D2g/j)
5
Where is the ALSE vest? Do they make nomex uniforms in the digital camo pattern? I haven't seen one. There are several things wrong with this picture.
Posted by: REMF at April 05, 2006 08:25 PM (7RMSi)
6
This scene is the future of the world if we don't stop the spread of islam now. All muslims must be exterminated.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 05, 2006 11:20 PM (0yYS2)
7
The thing that worries me the most: what took that Apache down?
As I'm been told, this is a powerful fighting machine, heavily armored and capable of almost everything. In the video it looks as if it was totally destroyed on impact! Unless the scene is an aftermath where the Army destroyed the Apache after leaving the crash site. In that case the dragging is staged!
But what took that Apache down. Could a simple RPG do this? Maybe, with a lucky shot! Or are other countries testing their hardware out on American military?
If the video is not an aftermath, and they have weapons that can destroy an Apache in a way the video shows, we have a problem!
Posted by: Dan at April 06, 2006 01:26 AM (Z2OsI)
8
Duh. Of course we have a problem. Yes, they shot it down. No, it wasn't staged. Yes, that was a body. And yes, we should kill 'em all, then dig 'em up and kill 'em again.
Posted by: RangerRuss at April 06, 2006 01:57 AM (cbhJK)
9
Haha! You stupid American think you safe. Ha! Well we have the anthrax. You catch the anthrax. No cure for anthrax. You die slow, painful death, American sadist pig! Haha! You think you catch us? We go to Switzerland! What you do? declare war on Switzerland? Stupid American. You can't declare war on Switzerland kill em all. kill em alkill em alllkill em allkill em allkill em allkill kill em allkill em allem allkill em allkill em allkill em kill em allkill em allallkill em allkill em allkill em allkkill kill em allem allillkill em all emkill em all allkill em allkill em all
Posted by: without war america is useless. at April 06, 2006 06:00 AM (zqsRN)
10
time to take care of things in iraq bring the troops home and retake the mexico/u.s. border and round up all the illegals
Posted by: shane at April 06, 2006 06:09 AM (Dp7Sn)
11
Good plan Shane, but we need to invade Iran and Syria first.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 06, 2006 06:28 AM (0yYS2)
12
Ohh anthrax how scary. You seem to forget we have that and so much nerve gas wer are burning it off. Enough bombs to destroy the entire world several times over, intelligence.
ssssssssssstupid.
Posted by: Howie at April 06, 2006 07:26 AM (D3+20)
13
Dan they have a few stingers and once in a while they find a guy that can work em. We had a video a while back. Probably shoulder fired missle.
Posted by: Howie at April 06, 2006 07:31 AM (D3+20)
14
My mind can still not comprehend how someone would want to produce a video like this, real or not. It's just unhuman.
Posted by: Muslihoon at April 06, 2006 07:45 AM (Q8UK2)
15
Muslihoon:
Lots of people pay $ to see worse than that at the theater.
Posted by: Mark Ferguson at April 06, 2006 01:27 PM (CMScO)
16
For a second there I thought it was a George Clooney movie.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 06, 2006 01:33 PM (0yYS2)
17
Without war America is useless, you seem insane.
Posted by: Leatherneck at April 06, 2006 02:10 PM (D2g/j)
18
Mark,
the fakey stuff in the theater is just that, fakey. The real stuff isn't pleasant to watch at all, no matter who's being killed.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at April 08, 2006 08:53 AM (8e/V4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The New Math
I look forward to Friday, not because it's the start of the weekend (I work most Saturdays) but because it's Victor Davis Hanson day at NRO. And this Friday, like most,
fails to disappoint:
So far the Iranian president has posed as someone 90-percent crazy and 10-percent sane, hoping we would fear his overt madness and delicately appeal to his small reservoirs of reason. But he should understand that if his Western enemies appear 90-percent children of the Enlightenment, they are still effused with vestigial traces of the emotional and unpredictable. And military history shows that the irrational 10 percent of the Western mind is a lot scarier than anything Islamic fanaticism has to offer.
10% > 90%
Mark it down, it's the only time it will ever make sense.
Posted by: Vinnie at
05:38 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 136 words, total size 1 kb.
1
A greater truth was never expressed.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 07, 2006 07:49 PM (0yYS2)
2
I love Hanson. He has a great mind. If I wasn't happily married, I'd be batting my eyelashes furiously at him.
Posted by: Oyster at April 08, 2006 04:49 AM (YudAC)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 08, 2006 05:59 AM (0yYS2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
148kb generated in CPU 0.0543, elapsed 0.2071 seconds.
135 queries taking 0.1774 seconds, 445 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.