January 22, 2005

Zarqawi or bin Laden: Who is the bigger threat??

Two must reads: Professor Chaos and James Joyner.

Posted by: Rusty at 02:32 PM | Comments (9) | Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Both need to be hogtied and quartered...slowly....whenever they're caught. But, of course, they will be jailed and treated oh so nicely...not like the prisoners of Abu Ghraib.

Posted by: Laura at January 23, 2005 10:10 AM (ptOpl)

2 I guess I don't grasp the motivation to "rank" these terrorists. During WWII were there arguments ranking Hitler, Hirohito and Mussolini? Indeed, right after Pearl Harbor, we through the bulk of our war effort at Europe (for all the faux-whining from the usual leftists about the US not focusing exclusively on OBL)

Posted by: Darleen at January 23, 2005 12:11 PM (FgfaV)

3 oh shoot... grammar error ... should be "we threw the bulk of our war effort" must.get.more.coffee.

Posted by: Darleen at January 23, 2005 12:17 PM (FgfaV)

4 They rank as equally evil to me. We have to exterminate them all. But how? The libs keep crying, "we can't kill innocent civilians". Didn't most of them flee their countries when they knew there would be attacks? Can't they make a general announcement of some sort, to evacuate the areas? Surely there are safe places for them to go, let other countries worry about them! Then, we can snuff out Zarqawi, Osama, etc.

Posted by: Laura at January 25, 2005 02:28 PM (ptOpl)

5 Well, if the Iraqi election doesn't work out, Hmmmm, does the term GENOCIDE mean anything . . Just kill 'em all, let God sort 'em out! If they can't vote themselves a Democratic government, there's no hope of peace, no matter how many troops we keep over there as peacekeepers. Let 'em keep their obsolete religion till the last . . And may the last come quickly! geezzzz . . I'm really getting to be a hardass . . .

Posted by: large at January 26, 2005 06:30 PM (VRK2g)

6 Zarqawi is the biggest threat. ~C

Posted by: firstbrokenangel at January 28, 2005 07:41 AM (D39Vm)

7 Hey did we catch another Zarqawi aide? I saw a news flash on the TV, saying we are "closing in on Zarqawi"...of course, the lib's would have you think we wouldn't be in this "mess" in the first place, had Bush not invaded Iraq. Same old shit.

Posted by: Laura at January 28, 2005 02:50 PM (ptOpl)

8 Zarqawi, Bin laden or both. Doesn't matter. Islam will produce more just like them. Islam must be held responsible for what it produces. Then it will stop. Modern, civilized societies must make the Muslim world understand this behavior will not tolerated. The governments, families, cities, parties, mosques or whatever that produces these killers must be held responsible. If the regions of the world producing these killers will not or cannot stop it, then it is our job to stop it. We are the victims of terror. We have a right to protect ourselves. Nations that don't believe this should be made to believe it. CAREING MORE ABOUT THEM THAN THEY CARE ABOUT US IS STUPID and will only prolong the inevitable. Better a few missles now than the big one later. When we bombed Germany and Japan into submission did anyone realize that there were good anti war people in those countries? So don't give me that good muslim shit. Good muslims correct bad muslims. 25 million Iraqis could control a few thousand terrorists if they really wanted to. Nations/peoples are responsible for what comes from them. The good people of Germany and Japan died along with the bad because they didn't control the bad. It was their responsibility. They didn't take care of their business so we did. We should not be fighting their civil war for them. Americans should not be dying for Iraq. Iraqis should be. To many of us have already died for ours. Know something else. The bastards still dance in the streets whenever an American is butchered. The Shites are not voteing because they care for America. They are voteing to take control so the Sunnis don't. Then it will be back to hating America. They will tell us to get out. Then the Clerics will move in. Then Iraq, Iran and others will sit down and discuss how truly terrible the infidel America is.

Posted by: greyrooster at January 30, 2005 12:19 PM (gvOyZ)

9 The World War II analogy is not appropriate. The Japanese people surrendered because their God-Emperor Hirohito surrendered, while the Islamic world has no single leader (the Caliphate was abolished by Kemal Ataturk in 1924). As for Germany, the Americans arrived there not so much as conquerors, as saviors from Communism. Better become friends of the Americans and British than be abandoned to the murder, rape and pillage of a vicious, vengeful Red Army.

Posted by: George Carty at October 04, 2005 04:14 AM (ZZQbd)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
21kb generated in CPU 0.1063, elapsed 0.1849 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.1757 seconds, 258 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.