I've been gone all week, so I saw little news. I do remember seeing a snippet about a suicide bombing, but didn't read anything about it.
If I end up in Hell, I only hope it's in the same cell as Zarqawi.
1
Michael Moore would be proud.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 28, 2005 01:35 AM (8e/V4)
2
It is almost incomprehensible the evil that men do, yet daily the United States is accused of killing civilians without remorse; however the enemy targets even softer targets -- women and children.
Tell us - where is the outrage?
Posted by: dave at November 28, 2005 07:24 AM (CcXvt)
3
Dave,
There is no outrage because the neo-libs are not concerned about the murder of innocents in Iraq, but the death of Americans soldiers. For them, the more soldiers that die, the better. They should be ashamed, and when the soldiers get back, they should be confronted for the traitors they are.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 28, 2005 09:23 AM (rUyw4)
4
we shouldn't use children as human shields.
Posted by: actus at November 28, 2005 09:42 AM (CqheE)
5
Damn, Actus, after your comments on neo-lib hate last night I thought you couldn't sink any lower. I was wrong.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 28, 2005 10:01 AM (rUyw4)
6
That's actually kinda sick actus - on an obvious note - you do acknowledge Iraqi children are not an effective shield from the insurgents - they really don't give a damn - do they?
Posted by: hondo at November 28, 2005 10:03 AM (Jvmry)
7
Actus, of course, would loudly proclaim that he "supports the troops". Never mind his accusing them of a war crime.
Posted by: Robert Crawford at November 28, 2005 10:09 AM (1j9aH)
8
I think we should take steps to keep kids away from military targets.
If we are attracting them to military targets, we shouldn't bemoan the fact that the terrorists are killing them.
Posted by: actus at November 28, 2005 11:30 AM (CqheE)
9
Actus,
You're kidding, right.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 28, 2005 11:48 AM (rUyw4)
10
Rectus you are a slimy, lowlife piece of shit, and I would gut you alive if we could just meet. Your glee at the deaths of these children comes through though you try to hide it, and I hope you burn to death very soon.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at November 28, 2005 11:49 AM (0yYS2)
11
"If we are attracting them to military sites, we shouldn't bemoan the fact the terrorists are killing them"
I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU JUST SAID THAT! THAT IS SICK AND STUPID!
"shouldn't bemoan"?????????
Posted by: hondo at November 28, 2005 12:04 PM (Jvmry)
12
See, hondo. And you said he was intelligent.
Posted by: Oyster at November 28, 2005 01:48 PM (fl6E1)
13
Oyster,
I hope he(hondo) has now changed his mind.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 28, 2005 02:19 PM (rUyw4)
14
See, this is what I'm talking about. Liberals have no problem with children getting killed as long as it can be used against the US or Bush. Liberals are subhuman scum.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at November 28, 2005 03:02 PM (0yYS2)
15
"Your glee at the deaths of these children comes through though you try to hide it, and I hope you burn to death very soon."
Oh no. No glee. I think its awful that these kids are near military targets. I think we should be keeping them away, rather than attracting them.
"See, this is what I'm talking about. Liberals have no problem with children getting killed as long as it can be used against the US or Bush."
Then you're misunderstanding. I do have a problem with it. this shouldn't happen.
Posted by: actus at November 28, 2005 05:32 PM (CqheE)
16
Oh no. No glee. I think its awful that these kids are near military targets. I think we should be keeping them away, rather than attracting them.
Those "targets" happen to be your fellow citizens, employed in the U.S Military.
Evidently according to your statement, you do not have a problem when its just the Soldiers getting killed?
"But, but, I support the troops, I just don't support the War!!"
Liar.
Posted by: dave at November 28, 2005 06:21 PM (CcXvt)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
