In what's becoming a busy day for me and blogging (unusual for a Sunday) a new blogger friend of mine pointed something out to me that he knew would get me fired up.
1
>>>"Still Think Liberals Don't Hate Conservatives?"
who could think such a thing? Liberalism is defined primarily by it's hatred of conservatives. They hate us so much they would side with terrorists if it would serve to even embarrass us. See Iraq.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 27, 2005 03:07 PM (8e/V4)
2
Yeah wishing harm upon evil cunts is guided by hatred, but supporting an invasion and the murder of 100,000 innocent civs is like cool mmkay.
What makes someone get up in the morning and decide they are going to spew some shit on the net in defense of chimpy?
It's not that he can't open locked doors, it's that he doesn't know what to do after he finds a locked door. Mummy?
Posted by: ren at November 27, 2005 03:48 PM (MabZi)
3
"right wingnut echo chamber"
No one is banning you, Jazz, so it's not really an "echo chamber", now is it? By all means, though, don't let that inconvenient fact get in the way of using the phrase "echo chamber" over and over again until you pass out from exhaustion.
By the way, I neither know about, or care about, the post office issue that has started this little cross-blog war. My advice: do more cat-blogging.
Posted by: File Closer at November 27, 2005 04:51 PM (xvfRU)
4
Everyday the literary geniuses of the left like ren reveal themselves for what they truly are: hypocritical, unethical, arrogant, narrow minded, intellectually lazy vultures waiting to celebrate the death of innocents and those who help them and the collapse of states just to be able to say: "Ha! You failed!". You will not get that chance.
Posted by: Graeme at November 27, 2005 05:01 PM (xDLTi)
5
What I find amazing is that the point of my article is to detail the hate the left has for the right.
Jazz has turned into some kind of fact crusade. This is a typical liberal tactic and I'm not surprised by Jazz's use of it.
Oh well, if he wants to call a 16 year-old a nazi that's his business. But, it's still wrong no matter how you shake it.
Posted by: Chris Short at November 27, 2005 05:02 PM (0OCQY)
6
Yes, I am well aware that the neo-liberals hate conservatives and anyone or thing that seeks to overturn the gains they have made in the US over the past 50 years.
Actually, loathe is a better word to describe their feelings. After years of having everything go their way, they are like spoiled children who have had their toys taken away.
Posted by: knight templer at November 27, 2005 05:09 PM (rUyw4)
Posted by: joejo at November 27, 2005 05:11 PM (x/ibx)
8
So Jazz, you've taken the bait.
The true underlying fact is that you're okay with calling a child a nazi.
Thanks for that Jazz, you pinko-commie hippie.
Posted by: Chris Short at November 27, 2005 05:11 PM (0OCQY)
9
I wish these scumbag Liberals would try to "understand" us conservatives the way they always try to "understand" terrorists and rioters and criminals of every variety.
I won't hold my breath though. Their desire to "understand" the world's filth is driven purely by their hatred of conservatism.
That's because Liberalism is merely a foil to conservativism-- whatever conservatives are against, Liberals will try to "understand".
That's why they'll never try to "understand" conservatives, because that would rob them of their reason for being.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 27, 2005 05:18 PM (8e/V4)
10
Yeah wishing harm upon evil cunts is guided by hatred, but supporting an invasion and the murder of 100,000 innocent civs is like cool mmkay.
Hi Ren, when you make up a fictitious civilian body count, you could take a note from Doctor Evil, he would have said:
supporting an invasion and the murder of 10 bazillion civilians is like cool
Why stop there, it could be 100 trillion innocent civilians, why not 500 bazillion?
Posted by: dave at November 27, 2005 05:40 PM (CcXvt)
11
Hey, Jazz, are you going to use stamps with Mary and baby Jesus on those cards? I wouldn't get too complacent there, Jazz, about how the facts are skewed by one side or the other. Little effort would be required for anyone to come up with a bushel of lies told by the Left.
Actually, Jazz, that is just one of the reasons the Post Office did not issue a new Madonna and child stamp this year. Very few new stamps are being issued because there is an increase in the price of stamps scheduled for Jan. 7 and the postal service didn't want to be caught with excess stamps that had to be destroyed.
Posted by: knight templer at November 27, 2005 05:46 PM (rUyw4)
12
"Jazz over at Running Scared called Real Teen a Hitler Youth. That's civil discourse at its finest in a liberal's mind:"
More like lying youth. He's wrong. Christmas hasn't been cancelled. And neither has the wingnut victim complex.
Posted by: actus at November 27, 2005 06:06 PM (Zi15r)
13
Hmmm...more like lying youth, says Actus, and Christmas hasn't been canceled. Well, true, Mr. Actus, Christmas as a secular holiday is still here but go to the post office and see if you get a Merry Christmas. I've been there over the past few years and have not received such a greeting. Has anyone else here been greeted that way at their local post office? That's what I thought.
As a matter of fact, I would say that no post office other than in a very small town in a red state would dare do anything that might be construed as being Christian.
And actus has included himself in the hate column by his use of the "wingnut" meme. One would assume that is not complimentary.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 27, 2005 06:38 PM (rUyw4)
14
I wasn't trying to disprove your point, jazz, but was clarifying the reason that the Madonna and Child stamp was not issued this season.
And again, you totally missed the point of the post in the first place. It was the extremely vile reaction from the Left that caught everyone's attention. You see, even a child can't make a mistake before you neo-liberal attack dogs pounce. That is the point of the post. It is the vileness of your reaction that gave rise to the post.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 27, 2005 06:48 PM (rUyw4)
15
That's great, Jazz. You're still COMPLETELY missing the point.
Posted by: Chris Short at November 27, 2005 06:52 PM (0OCQY)
16
We're not talking about a debate, but the reaction of the Left. Why don't you take credit for your hate, Jazz? It's obvious for everyone to see.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 27, 2005 06:52 PM (rUyw4)
17
"Well, true, Mr. Actus, Christmas as a secular holiday is still here but go to the post office and see if you get a Merry Christmas."
What the hell do I care if I get a merry christmas out of someone? I'll just go get a madonna and child stamp. And the X-men and other make-believe people too.
Posted by: actus at November 27, 2005 06:55 PM (Zi15r)
18
I'll go ahead and join the frey. I'm willing to edit my comments because I don't want that type of left-wing propoganda on my site. If he wishes to continue spinning this, so be it. I am satisfied in his reaction because I obviously struck a nerve.
Posted by: RealTeen at November 27, 2005 06:57 PM (iE4Hw)
19
Actus,
You're proving in living color(or black and white, as the case might be) exactly what this post is all about.
Rest your case, Mr. Prosecutor, Mr. Actus is guilty as charged!
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 27, 2005 07:01 PM (rUyw4)
20
Jazz, read the post! It says that neo-libs are going over the top with their hateful ways. What part of that do you not understand?
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 27, 2005 07:03 PM (rUyw4)
21
Why don't we have an accurate count of the innocent civs killed? hmmm oh thats right cos the US military "doesn't do bodycounts". Why? Because it looks bad when there are numbers next to the WMD's used. Try and estimate for me the number of deaths that will occur over the next decade due to DU exposure?
What's it matter tho? you guys are cold heartless arrogant wankers that think the world should bow to the might of the US. If supporting the murder of innocents doesn't affect you then I don't see how my pissing and moaning will change a thing. You have made your bed now you gotta sleep with the bloody sheets.
Posted by: ren at November 27, 2005 07:06 PM (MabZi)
22
Jazz,
Come on... Just re-read this article and see if this is about the Post Office or your actions?
Posted by: Chris Short at November 27, 2005 07:08 PM (0OCQY)
23
OK, jazz, fine, but that does not excuse the hate you are displaying. You should chastise someone, but to call them a Nazi, fascist, etc. is wrong.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 27, 2005 07:08 PM (rUyw4)
24
ren,
You're off topic. Go start your own blog, or stay on topic.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 27, 2005 07:11 PM (rUyw4)
25
Jazz, I edited the comment because I think I gave you enough air time on my site in my posts to let you insert un-censored opinion in my comments section. I censored you because it was liberal garbage.
Posted by: RealTeen at November 27, 2005 07:15 PM (iE4Hw)
26
RealTeen,
You mean like his inability to stay on topic here?
Posted by: Chris Short at November 27, 2005 07:16 PM (0OCQY)
27
Chris, it's not only an inability to STAY on topic, he hasn't even seemed to find the topic yet.
Posted by: RealTeen at November 27, 2005 07:20 PM (iE4Hw)
28
Jazz, it's ok. You probably cut school the day they went over "main topic" in reading class. You might want to Google it.
It's one thing to debate or dispute another's opinion, point of view, etc. It's another thing to spread hate. You could have argued your point without the hate.
Posted by: Maureen at November 27, 2005 07:29 PM (ny5O/)
29
I take it that they have conceded.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 27, 2005 08:05 PM (rUyw4)
30
ren, I'll assume with your verbage, you're British.
If that's the case then you should know that the British also deploy Depleted Uranium in their shells too.
There isn't a bodycount because it's logistically impossible, for one; cultural reasons, the Muslims require expedient burial, that combined with the fact that it would be hard to determine deaths caused by insurgents or terrorists (would they count?) and the manpower that it would consume. Does the British keep a running count or any forces in the arena?
There is no bloodless war, the very fact that insurgents and terrorists both use civilians as meatshields is causing a lot of the problems, as are attacks against checkpoints all people not stopping when asked will be engaged, however I have a feeling you're not so worried about civilians that are killed by insurgents, or terrorists, just the ones you can smear the U.S with.
Posted by: dave at November 27, 2005 08:16 PM (CcXvt)
31
"You're proving in living color(or black and white, as the case might be) exactly what this post is all about."
lies about what you can get at the post office? Indeed, all your make believe is there.
Posted by: actus at November 27, 2005 08:21 PM (Zi15r)
32
Actus,
At least "act" like you have a brain. You know what the post is about. It's about hate and has nothing to do with the post office. Be a man for once and admit it.
Greg,
You're a turd.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 27, 2005 08:24 PM (rUyw4)
33
Rusty, ban Greg forever!
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 27, 2005 08:30 PM (rUyw4)
34
Chris, great post! You certainly proved your point.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 27, 2005 08:35 PM (rUyw4)
35
personally I hope that really isn't greg.
Posted by: dave at November 27, 2005 08:53 PM (CcXvt)
36
shock and bore is more like, I guess you made everyone's point.
Posted by: dave at November 27, 2005 08:57 PM (CcXvt)
Posted by: RealTeen at November 27, 2005 08:58 PM (iE4Hw)
38
Greg, you're still a turd!
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 27, 2005 09:09 PM (rUyw4)
39
An immature turd, at that!
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 27, 2005 09:12 PM (rUyw4)
40
Hey, Greg, all that garbage makes more sense than you do when you are trying to post. Hahaha!
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 27, 2005 09:25 PM (rUyw4)
41
wow greg. You've sunk pretty low with that one.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at November 27, 2005 09:29 PM (8e/V4)
42
Fart in his face again, Rusty.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 27, 2005 09:33 PM (rUyw4)
43
My, my, my haven't we been busy. I hate that I was late to the party. Pathetic and yet oddly entertaining...
Posted by: Laura at November 27, 2005 09:41 PM (ftixA)
44
Laura,
The neo-libs could not have proved Chris' post any better, had they tried. Hate has now consumed them, and excuse me I can't help but say this, they have succummed to the 'dark side'.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 27, 2005 09:48 PM (rUyw4)
45
Liberals can't even pull a Denial of Service attack against a webboard.
nice paste and copy attack there, we tremble at your power...... Help me Jebus!
Posted by: dave at November 27, 2005 09:51 PM (CcXvt)
46
I have found that liberals will, in few numbers, ignore facts (plausible deniability?), but the majority will start with the name calling. And no, for those liberals still reading the comments, I am not saying the post office story is true. I am stating that the point of the post,
the name calling and hatred, was overwhelmingly proven by several people in these comments.
Posted by: Anna at November 27, 2005 10:09 PM (GRCAh)
47
Saying that they have succummed to the 'dark side' is just giving them way too much credit. That would imply that they had some higher cognitive abilities and that they at one point had a conscious.
Posted by: Laura at November 27, 2005 10:09 PM (ftixA)
48
Chock these comments up to the 2006 ammo pile.
Posted by: Chris Short at November 27, 2005 10:12 PM (0OCQY)
49
I love how lefties rushed to prove your point. They can't admit their own hatred, so rush to fling feces. Ghost's tantrum was just icing on the cake.
Posted by: Robert Crawford at November 27, 2005 10:18 PM (Gn9tM)
50
Shocking thread. Jazz's arguments were well taken and backed by evidence. What follows in response is a senseless shouting match and a host of tired anti-liberal smears. You found his one weal spot, the fact that he jokingly (and thus the strikeout) referred to the "Bush Youth," and then, sean Hannity-style, you used that weak spot to hide behind, while evading jazz's essential points. Smooth, slick and cowardly.
Posted by: richard at November 28, 2005 03:06 AM (tG1eq)
51
We have been running a search on Bush's brain and have found nothing of value in his primitive cerebrum.
Posted by: Agent Smith at November 28, 2005 05:46 AM (OM64d)
52
I'm staying out of this one. However - I would have invoked Godwin's Law a good while back.
Posted by: Oyster at November 28, 2005 06:41 AM (YudAC)
53
Jazz's arguments were well taken and backed by evidence.
Perhaps, but they had nothing to do with the subject at hand. The original post talked about A, Jazz argued about B.
Posted by: Robert Crawford at November 28, 2005 07:10 AM (1j9aH)
54
I took part in an argument similar to this after Hurricane Katrina when someone over at Bradblog posted that he wouldn't send any help to NO because it was in a red state.
He said he changed his mind because most of the people in NO voted blue, yet he was apparently unable to see that his logic would have denied aid to a city that voted red, such as Houston.
These are the people we are dealing with. They are truly people without a soul, mean spirited beyond belief, with no sympathy or humanity for someone who thinks differently.
The neo-libs have taken hypocrisy to a new level.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 28, 2005 09:34 AM (rUyw4)
55
There seems to be an increase in name calling.
Posted by: john ryan at November 28, 2005 07:46 PM (ads7K)
56
Jazz is probably a spook.
Posted by: greyrooster at November 29, 2005 07:18 PM (ZaAd/)
57
What I find amusing is that one can easily see that leftists who have screeched and made personal attacks on me must have been educated recently in government run schools.
Their reading comprehension is nil. Or they just read what they want.
My post was two-fold. 1 - My mother was told,
unsolicitied by the PO employee that no new "religious" stamps would be issued and 2 - employees had been instructed to say "Happy Holidays" instead of "Merry Christmas". I believed her
anecdotal experience was significant enough, not only to share, but to ask others to check out for themselves.
I even posted that last year's religious stamps were STILL AVAILABLE. I
did mock the wording of the "Cookies" press release because it was so damned tortured.
Jazz lost at his Godwin Law's violation AND he can't even spell my name right.
meshugga schmuck
Posted by: Darleen at November 29, 2005 10:12 PM (FgfaV)
58
I've never posted here before, and I'm not sure I will again just because of all the name calling, but I thought I would raise a question. This is somewhat off topic (as in it is not about anyone being nasty to anyone else), but it relates to Jazz's assertion about "facts."
What facts, exactly?
I've searched the USPS's website, and I haven't been able to find any statement whatsoever about why there isn't a Madonna and child stamp this year. From what I can determine (someone else can correct me if I'm wrong), this information came from some other website and was a quote from a postal worker simply stating that they still had the stamp from last year in stock.
Okay... but that didn't stop them from printing brand new stamps just for the holiday this year, so the idea that they don't want to stock something new when they've still got the old ones doesn't make any sense. It's just paper and ink and a little bit of nasty-tasting sticky stuff.
How about the "fact" that there are going to be new Madonna and Child stamps in 2006? Well, I couldn't find that information on the USPS website at all. Rather, I found a tiny comment at the bottom of the press reports for last year, in the standard blurb, that there were not going to be any postage increases until 2006. That doesn't relate to the Madonna and Child stamp at all, and to suggest that this may be why they didn't print a new one doesn't make any sense, since they have issued numerous new stamps quite recently (not only the holiday ones, but a series on Distinquished Marines, the Muppets, and a single stamp depicting Greta Garbo). Furthermore, the only news about upcoming new stamps listed on the site is for one called "Washington 2006" which is scheduled to be released in May of next year.
I don't know why the post office didn't print new Madonna and Child stamps this year... and from what I've been able to find on the USPS post office, it seems that there is no way that anyone else can determine those "facts" either. Except maybe to ask a postal employee... and those responses are listed on the website of the people others are choosing to call "liars."
Just the facts???
Merry Christmas, all.
Diana
Posted by: DianaLee at November 30, 2005 10:36 AM (g/qK/)
Posted by: taylor drake at December 07, 2005 07:15 AM (4elwz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
