August 29, 2005

So, where's the questionable content in this?

I posted the following comment to Rusty's post about academia, and it was rejected for "questionable content." I tried changing "tittering" to "confusion" but it was still rejected. Maybe I shouldn't have said: "Seriously..."

Rusty:

Too late for me, I guess. Seriously, there are a number of academically oriented blogs that are couched toward giving "constructive advice" to the Bush administration, like Democracy Arsenal. They aren't the "looney left," but sometimes I wonder if they aren't just camouflaging schadenfreude behind a lot of opinionated complexity. Their ideas have the force of... words.

It's simple. We meet the vanguard of Islamofascism with our vanguard of liberal democracy, and keep at it until we win. Knowing this apparently disqualifies me from academia; at least until the power of my ideas drowns out the confusion of their words.

That's the hope, anyway.

Posted by: Demosophist at 11:05 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 153 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Just tried to post her about the "gosh" storm and it was rejected for "questionable content" too.

Posted by: NOTR at August 29, 2005 11:55 PM (izx0t)

2 Spam control I might guess. We have been gettign loads. So links might be suspect as well as the words enhance Mortgage so on and so forth.

Posted by: Howie at August 30, 2005 10:14 AM (D3+20)

3 It's clear that the questionable word was "liberal."

Posted by: IO ERROR at August 30, 2005 01:39 PM (HaVXj)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
17kb generated in CPU 0.0212, elapsed 0.2202 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.2008 seconds, 252 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.