January 31, 2005

Have You Stopped Beating Your Wife?

So how racist are you, exactly?  Harvard thinks they have a way of figuring that out, via the Harvard Implicit Association Test (Courtesy Tim Blair.)

This test purports to discover what hidden biases you might have on race, gender, sexuality or any one of a number of things.  The methodology the test seems to use is based largely on what appears to be the Freudian Slip methodology.  Take it and you'll see what I mean.

The part that I found supremely interesting was that I took the test to determine whether or not I was biased in favor of Kerry or Bush.  Now, I am going to wait a minute for you all to look back through my posting history and form your own judgment on where I stand.  Don't worry, go ahead - I'll wait.

Back?  Good.  The Harvard folks told me that I have somewhere from a slight to moderate bias in favor of ...  Kerry.

Yup.

So, all I can figure is that the test is a good mechanism for telling you what word associations have been seared, seared in your memory by a mind-numbingly relentless media assault.  In other words, after hearing the 4.9 million assertions that Bush = Hitler, it seems that the word association game gets weighted a bit to go along with whatever the dominant saturation message of the day happens to be.

Now, just for a flight of fancy, suppose that we assume that Harvard is a bastion of the leftist liberal elite intelligentsia, and that the media establishment is heavily biased towards the left, wouldn't this then make the Harvard test a measure of how effective the media is in telling us what we think?

Personally, I think that argument is a bit tin-foil hattish.  Nonetheless, I still stand by the assertion that the test is a better measure of what reflexive word associations have been impressed upon us by our environment, rather than any latent bias.

And I was kind of hoping that anything of this magnitude that Harvard chose to roll out wouldn't have produced such contrary results so very easily.

But then again, I'm not an Ivy Leaguer.

(Simultaneously launched by Bravo Romeo Delta from Demosophia, The Jawa Sun-Times, & Anticipatory Retaliation)

Posted by: Bravo Romeo Delta at 04:46 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 385 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Maybe you're simply a "compassionate conservative?" If so, there's nothing wrong with that. George W. described himself as such when he was campaigning back in 2000.

Posted by: Venom at February 01, 2005 09:00 AM (dbxVM)

2 I'd add that if you align yourself with GW you will still come off left-of-center, like most of the fiscal policies he's signed off on (with the main exception of the personal income-tax reduction). not to mention the bigger government vis a vis Homeland Security and a new intel reorg/czar.

Posted by: tee bee at February 01, 2005 10:53 AM (q1JHF)

3 The thing is that the Bush v. Kerry test has precious to do with actual political views, but is seeking to determine what visceral bias one has towards the gentlemen.

Posted by: Bravo Romeo Delta at February 01, 2005 11:11 AM (kiA+F)

4 Rusty, how did you find the Kerry - Bush test? I didn't see an option for U.S. nationalities.

Posted by: SteveL at February 01, 2005 12:16 PM (HBkVS)

5 "Your data suggest a slight automatic preference for Bush relative to Kerry " This test is wrong. My preference is/was not slight! Shrinks need to desing a better test than this! Ask anyone who knows me. Slight my as-!

Posted by: Rod Stanton at February 01, 2005 12:23 PM (gVJtb)

6 Good point, BRD.

Posted by: Venom at February 01, 2005 12:27 PM (dbxVM)

7 SteveL, When you get to the page, just hit the section that says Demonstration - that's the default for US users, and will have the whole raft of American tests.

Posted by: Bravo Romeo Delta at February 01, 2005 01:08 PM (kiA+F)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
20kb generated in CPU 0.0474, elapsed 0.1403 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.1313 seconds, 256 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.