September 28, 2005

Did Castro Kill Salvador Allende?

Interesting theory. I'd love if it were true. Any conversation with a Leftist longer than 10 minutes and Salvador Allende's name will come up in the long list of bad things America has done in the past. Usually inserted somewhere between 'East Timor' and 'illegal bombing of Cambodia', but always right before 'support for the Shah'--meant to prove that policy X (insert policy here) is also bad and therefore America 'is the real biggest terrorist in the world'--yada, yada, yada.

From Swimming Against the Red Tide:

The fact is that Allende was not a suicide, he was not killed by the military that took the power in september, 1973. During their assault against La Moneda palace, Chilean president was cowardly murdered by one of the Cuba agent that were in charge of his protection
Go check out the full translation of the original article that he has posted here.

He also links to this article about a new book by Christopher Andrews and Vasili Mitrokhin The World Was Going Our Way: The KGB and the Battle for the Third World. The book claims that now open Soviet archives show that the much of the right-wing paranoia about self-proclaimed indigenous movementes really being directed from Moscow were, in fact, not so much paranoia as based in fact.

The book claims:

• The KGB documents record actual and proposed payments to Chile's Salvador Allende totaling $420,000 both before and after his election as president in 1970.

• Costa Rica's José ''Pepe'' Figueres received $300,000 from the KGB for his 1970 presidential campaign and $10,000 afterward.

• The KGB ''trained and financed'' the Sandinistas who seized the National Palace in Managua and dozens of hostages in 1978. A senior KGB official was briefed on the plan on the eve of the raid, led by Edén Pastora, also known as Commander Zero...

The book describes Allende as ''by far the most important of the KGB's confidential contacts in South America,'' because he was a democratically-elected Marxist and Castro's ally. In KGB lexicon, a confidential contact is more like a friendly source, not an agent.

But Allende's KGB file says the agency maintained ''systematic contact'' with him since 1961, the book adds. One report says, "He stated his willingness to cooperate on a confidential basis . . . since he considered himself a friend of the Soviet Union.''

So while the Nixon administration and CIA were working diligently to prevent his election in 1970, and to oust him afterward, the KGB also was working hard to put him and keep him in power, the book says.

This is surely going to ruffle a few feathers!

To be honest, I'm not up to speed on the Pinochet junta. Too many people I respect seem to think that toppling Allende was not a good thing. So, regardless of who pulled the trigger, the fact remains that the U.S. actively helped in the overthrow of a democratically elected President. Just because he was a Commie does not mean he was a threat to the U.S. Remember, during the same period Italy had communist governments yet remained loyal to NATO.

I'm open, though, to hearing opposing viewpoints.

Hat tip h0mi who found the link at Babalu Blog.

Posted by: Rusty at 05:18 PM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 544 words, total size 4 kb.

1 Dear Rusty: A fact that you don't know is that the Chilean congress made a official announcement to the military to do something to stop Allende's government to be a proxy of Fidel Castro: many Cuban agents were in Chile (more than thousand of them) to lead the civil Chilean society to a burst. It will make possible to turn a democratic government into a leftist dictatoship. The information is right here. You see: Pinochet followed orders from the Chilean Chamber of Deputies!!! Don't blame it on CIA or USA. http://www.economiaysociedad.com/carta11_ingles.html "In effect, President Allende became a tyrant when he broke his solemn oath to respect the Constitution and the Chilean laws. There are numerous evidences to that effect (including a clear statement of the Supreme Court), but the most important one--and widely unknown outside of Chile--is the momentous Agreement of 23 August 1973 of the Chamber of Deputies (the Lower House of the Chilean Congress), which I have translated and posted as "The Declaration of Breakdown of Chilean Democracy". In this Agreement, it is presented a list of the legal and constitutional violations of President Allende's government, and it is agreed to "make representations" of this "grave breach of the legal and constitutional order of the Republic" to, among other authorities, "the Armed Forces". At the same time it agrees to "make representations to them that, by virtue of their function, of their oath to remain faithful to the Constitution and the law, ... it is up to them to put immediate end to all the situations referred to above, which infringe the Constitution and the law"

Posted by: luis afonso at September 28, 2005 06:42 PM (5rO9J)

2 So, in effect, are you saying that the overthrow of Allende was good? Since Pinochet put the country under martial law for--how long? ten years?--wouldn't that be a more clear case of abuse? Like I said, though, I'm not 100% up to speed on this.

Posted by: Rusty at September 28, 2005 06:49 PM (JQjhA)

3 Castro is responible for the shoot down of two unamred aircraft of BROTHERS TO THE RESCUE and still liberals including that idiot JIMMY CARTER wants better relationship with CUBA SCREW CASTRO AND SCREW CARTER

Posted by: sandpiper at September 28, 2005 08:12 PM (as4nC)

4 all democracies are not equally good. Like when Islamists win an election in Algeria. That is part of the reason that we do not live in a democracy, the founding fathers felt (rightly in my view) that there was too much danger in allowing rule by a simple maiority of the mases. So that is why our government is a republic not a democracy.

Posted by: john Ryan at September 28, 2005 09:24 PM (ads7K)

5 Dr Shackleford, At no time in the history of Italy has it had a communist national government. There have been, it is true, regional governments and cities dominated by the Reds, but the old joke was that the PCI didn't want power, because then THEY would be blamed for all the problems!

Posted by: Jovan-Marya Weismiller, T.O.Carm at September 29, 2005 02:58 AM (vrziv)

6 What am I missing? Castro and Allende were both communist. So, what was Castro's motive? Seems Pinochet and the US both had a greater motive than Castro.

Posted by: Doug Purdie at September 29, 2005 04:14 PM (00DOn)

7 Primacy Doug, primacy. Castro, like all other megalomaniacal psychopath dictators, brooks no rivals. He liked being Russia's main Latin American lackey, because it made him Important, but now, he's just pathetic, so he's letting his own houseboy Chavez play the dictator for a while.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 29, 2005 07:49 PM (0yYS2)

8 I linked this story to my Russian History Blog at http://russian-history-blog.blogspot.com/2005/12/mitrokhin-ii-other-revelations.html

Posted by: John Potter at December 06, 2005 03:52 PM (SfS9v)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
24kb generated in CPU 0.0119, elapsed 0.1116 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.1053 seconds, 257 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.