January 21, 2005

'Cool Mom' Has Sex-Drug Parties for Teen Boys

(Denver, Colorado) A 40-year-old woman, Sylvia Johnson, has been charged with sexual assault and contributing to the delinquency of a minor for hosting weekly sex-drug parties for teenage boys. According to the affidavit, she gave them marijuana, methamphetamines, and alcoholic drinks and then had sex with some of them. Eight boys got drugs and drinks and five boys got sex. The jig was up when one of the Johnson party boys told his mommy who called police.

The media seems to be reporting more and more instances of adult woman engaging intimately with young boys and one wonders how much of this type of behavior remains hidden.

Companion Post at Interested-Participant.

Posted by: Mike Pechar at 10:43 PM | Comments (32) | Add Comment
Post contains 127 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Lots is my uninformed guess. Remember the school teacher in Wash who while maried had two kids with her students went to jail and just four months ago was a precinct captain for their new woman govenor. It is becoming the new "progressive" womans role model.

Posted by: Rod Stanton at January 22, 2005 07:19 AM (IcheV)

2 Probably a lot more than we will ever know. Maybe because some boys and men look at it as some sort of rite of passage?

Posted by: Maureen at January 22, 2005 09:58 AM (ny5O/)

3 Diff'rnt Strokes I guess . . . Down the street from our home is a duplex that has it's share of questionable people . . Several years ago a lady and her High School age daughter rented one side. The Daughter would bring home several High School age boys at a time and Mom would "Do" 'em all . . Weird! Th' daughter was the bait, mom was th' shark! Didn't seem to bother th' boys . . Cops came an' broke it up . . Lot's of boys really dissapointed! heh, heh . . . And as an old guy told me once . . Just as many people screwin as there ever was, Just different people doin' it! Years ago I used to hear a lot of jokes about the Rural Teachers and Johnny . . and the jokes about the Pastor's rapport with all the old maids . . Hmmm, guess they was just humorous truths . . . based on what we see now . . .

Posted by: large at January 22, 2005 01:35 PM (VRK2g)

4 Man, it's like my adolescent dreams come true!!!

Posted by: Rusty at January 22, 2005 02:22 PM (JQjhA)

5 LARGE: You forgot about the preacher's daughter.

Posted by: greyrooster at January 23, 2005 08:16 AM (MU+F1)

6 The little snitch needs an ass whipping. Probably will get one from classmates who missed out.

Posted by: greyrooster at January 23, 2005 08:19 AM (MU+F1)

7 I don't think it's "hidden" as much as if its not reported by 'media' we don't think its happening. Since I work at a DA office, I won't say we see this all the time, but often enough that yes, adult women do exploit/assault underage boys (we even have had instances of female pedophilia). But its out of the stereotype of male adult/juvie female that it garners does garner attention of the media. Can we just please not pretend that sexual exploitation of young males has no detrimental effect? The difference between fantasy and reality is profound. Most women have had what can be described as "rape" fantasies, but no one seriously thinks the reality of rape is an enviable instance.

Posted by: Darleen at January 23, 2005 12:32 PM (FgfaV)

8 There were some friends' moms from my high school days that I wish had molested me...some teachers too. I am having a hard time seeing how that would have been detrimental to me.

Posted by: Mr. K at January 23, 2005 02:02 PM (+aU16)

9 None of my friends had hot moms, and only a couple of teachers were marginally acceptable. In the airport the other day, I met a damned fine high school teacher, maybe 24 years old. Life is unfair, I never had a teacher like that.

Posted by: Joe R. the Unabrewer at January 23, 2005 10:02 PM (wISdR)

10 DARLEEN: You make me laugh. Sexual exploitation of young males by females. Yea right. I'm cracking up, you obviously don't understand the primary thing on young mens minds. Go find a group of young teenagers and ask them if they would feel exploited if a woman had sex with them. Ha, Ha, Ha. You've got to be kidding. heh,heh. excuse me I just spilled my drink laughing so hard. Have a blessed day. Ho, Ho, Ha, Ha.

Posted by: greyroooster at January 24, 2005 05:00 PM (MHr0+)

11 I only wish there was a woman like that when I went to school. I would have been there every friggin day like clock-work pounding her. Sheesh, like greyrooster said that's whats on all teenage boys minds. Heck, I bet even the gay guys think more about sex than anything too. Lets face it, guys love sex.

Posted by: Vorchatwo at January 25, 2005 03:47 PM (2exy8)

12 Sylvia Johnson was just copying VENOM.

Posted by: greyrooster at January 25, 2005 08:40 PM (pSK/I)

13 SEX..SEX...SEX!!!!!!!!! SEX IS GOOD!

Posted by: NAME at February 02, 2005 08:02 PM (ywZa8)

14 If the gender was different and it was your younger sister with a "cool" dad I wonder if people would be so willing to excuse it.

Posted by: Disgusted at February 19, 2005 04:34 PM (EvCHq)

15 Sex is every where whether it be "moral" or "immoral". We just hear about it more because of better communication. It is the best pleasure in life and I don't know why we are forbidden to experience it... Are we saving it for the next life?

Posted by: Blue at April 01, 2005 04:30 PM (0TUWQ)

16 that is gay

Posted by: stephanie at April 20, 2005 12:08 PM (8BLEU)

17 Sounds funny when it is some boys fantasy, what if the teacher were male and it were you would it be ok then? Abuse has a negative impact, sex should be sharing with someone you love an extremely personal experience a symbol of the relationship you share, not a perverted fantasy. How is mutating it in to some pathetic fantasy a wonderful thing. Sex does have boundries, they call them laws. These laws are created by society based on examples of what is considered acceptable, sex is ok within those boundries and abnormal outside. Just because your mind can think it, or evil parts of man's nature may embrace it, that does not make it right. Look at the destruction caused in the form of marriages destroyed, families broken, and young lives altered forever. With this truth, tell me this is a victimless crime, cool, and a joke. Tell that to the children who's families were destroyed. Be a real man and tell them its ok because you would have enjoyed tearing their family apart for your own gratification. Real men have the fortitude and self control to do what is right, not what feels good in some cases. They think about something other than themselves.

Posted by: Assulted at July 18, 2005 01:06 PM (p+aus)

18 She can bang me all day long. I don't care if I'm 9 years old, I'd bang that.

Posted by: Josh at July 20, 2005 07:15 AM (Z0LFy)

19 the big question is, did she do her own kid??

Posted by: fred at July 21, 2005 06:40 AM (7dD0C)

20 I'd like to know which little fag told his mommy

Posted by: Rob at July 26, 2005 03:01 PM (tXv5y)

21 When it comes to female pedophelia, I'd love to be the victim. I'm also getting a little T.O.'d because I still haven't seen a full body shot of this "cool-mom". Geeez...

Posted by: Matti at July 26, 2005 03:20 PM (F9Upy)

22 Dispensing drugs is of course a problem; making a teenage kid feel like a pimp daddy for a brief moment is nothing of the sort. I love these people that declare boundaries and standards for sex and claim that these are somehow set in stone; laws were created in America by our puritanical forefathers. Go talk to people in other nations and see what they think. My bet's they'll laugh their asses off at you for being a prudish, self-righteous idiot who claims to be the authority who they can or cannot bone. The only reason it's a problem is because our society is conditioned to make it so. We are quickly approaching a medical age where pregnancy and STDs will no longer be a significant concern; sexual conservativism has outlived its value. Admittedly, being penetrated against one's will (or conned into accepting it) is one thing; giving a horny adolescent an opportunity to nail something besides his hand is something else entirely.

Posted by: Protocult at July 26, 2005 07:48 PM (3BUrJ)

23 I would actually pay good money to tap that fine ass. I wish that was my mom, and I got to have 3 ways with me and my friends.

Posted by: Tap It at July 27, 2005 06:15 AM (qo1SU)

24 Regarding your post, lady, let's think about this some more... "Sex does have boun[a]dries, they call them laws. These laws are created by society based on examples of what is considered acceptable, sex is ok within those boundries and abnormal outside. Just because your mind can think it, or evil parts of man's nature may embrace it, that does not make it right." Have you ever given a bj or had a guy go down on you? Is it legal in your state? I bet you real money it isn't. Do you know that it's illegal in the military to have sex in anything other than the missionary position? Should they all be arrested, fined, convicted? Careful what you wish for, lady.

Posted by: sane person at July 27, 2005 08:03 AM (MFxh5)

25 I love how when hearing about this story it always comes back to sex. She gave the kids drugs including meth (right up there with heroin and crack as far as i'm concerned) and what do we come back to talking about every time: Ohh noOOOO highschoolers are having the SEX!!! Just be glad these guys were taking it out on a 35 year old slut, and not your teenage daughter.

Posted by: perspective at July 27, 2005 12:04 PM (fgqCq)

26 Do you jackasses not get it? Sex between an adult and a minor is illegal, regardless of the two peoples' gender, or whether or not it was mutually consensual. It's real easy to say, "Hey, cool, I'd tap that ass, blah blah blah," but if they were underage, it's still molestation, and I don't believe for a second that it won't have a negative effect on how these guys think of women. They'll probably grow up to view them as a piece of meat, like you all do. Geez, grow up, you bunch of oversexed dickheads.

Posted by: Lisa at July 27, 2005 02:51 PM (qzD74)

27 It is ridiculous, the drugs are bad, but sex is great, when I was that age it wouldn't have been molestation, everything except missionary, including oral sex, etc, and anything outside of marriage is techincally illegal almost everywhere in teh United States, but I think the age of consent is just that, and different for everyone, i easily could have consented to sex at 14, i knew what I wanted and i went after it. Its people like you who made sex such a bad and dirty thing when its something we can enjoy, that is certainly here and exsisting rather than the paradise i will supposedly be shunned from if I abstain, sex and love for everyone! Men and women both want sex equally, but we are on different time tables, women want sex say 15 minutes after a man, so if you can hold out for 20... she will be chasing you for 5, boom goes the dynamite!

Posted by: Louie at August 05, 2005 02:34 PM (Fmjkv)

28 Kids may think about sex, we all did, but the act changes everything. Kids think about being Superman and flying, does this mean we should let them junp off the house roof. Drugs just make it worse. How does a person give drugs to a child and then use them for sex. Kids are looking for exceptance and want to do what adults do. The 60's showed us that the open use of drugs and sex does not build good adults. What it does is add years to the growing up process and some do not ever make it. Most adults remember the freedom they had as children. Yet, some of you praise a person for robbing someone of their childhood. I find it interesting that it is adults who would like to have had these experiences when they were kids, but they are adults wishing it. For those that think it is ok to give kids drugs or have sex with them, try being Superman first and if you survive the roof then think about what you have learned. Self control builds character, doing things just because they "feel good" does not lead to sefrespect or make for someone who understand cause and effect.

Posted by: Joseph at September 18, 2005 12:25 PM (b/Xgq)

29 See badjocks.com for their 'Desperate Housewives Effect' essay. I'm sure this stuff has been going on way before then, but it appears that along with a generally more sexually inclined female populace, various forms of not-so-healthy behavior is starting to take place. Guys have been doing screwed up crap for forever. I'm sure women have too, but now it seems like it's going up exponentially.

Posted by: Brett at September 20, 2005 02:22 PM (OV5ZJ)

30 As for your superman comment--you made a terrible analogy. You don't let your kids jump off the roof because it would kill them. Sex will rarely kill anyone. There are some STD concerns, and it may have emotional and mental consequences, but those certainly won't kill or cripple you with as much certainty as jumping off your house. On the contrary, sex is a HEALTHY THING, the benefits of which have not even been fully grasps by repressed America (Good for the heart, mentally energizing, good for the skin complexion, good for hormone levels)... I'm not saying it's good to have sex at 14, nor is exploiting anyone for sex. And the drugs are the main problem with Mrs. Johnson's scenario. But putting sex on the same level as something stupid, suicidal, and ridiculous (like jumping off your house) is not only silly and puritanical, but an incredible detriment to society and the health of Americans, young or old.

Posted by: Healthy Younng Guy at September 27, 2005 08:52 PM (D+Gew)

31 There seem to be three mindsets regarding the subject of consensual sex between underage boys and adult women; men, women, and prudes. Women think it’s horrible, men think it’s wonderful, and prudes don't count because they don't think sex can be a legitimate activity except between a man and his wife. That is not the issue here, although I basically agree that this is the best arrangement. Reality is that we cannot rationally expect girls/boys/men/women to wait until they are twenty-five or thirty and married to experience their first orgasm. Sorry, but that isn't a rational expectation. Nature will not allow it. So, since we know that both males and females have their first sexual experiences at very tender ages, typically well before the onset of puberty, the question is not whether "children" have sex but what the quality and content of that sexual activity may be. The legal question has been decided and set in law, but there is significant disagreement among reasonable people regarding the fairness of existing law on this issue. The moral question underlying this discussion regards the effect of sex on children (anyone below the age of consent). Since all normal children have sex, whether masturbatory or with others, we can conclude that sexual activity is normal and even beneficial, and cannot be avoided without imposing extraordinary and potentially harmful restrictions. Well, it appears that we are left with sexual activity for children being normal and even beneficial, assuming that there is no coercion (force or unusual persuasion, such as administering drugs) employed in the process. What about age? If a, say, ten-year-old boy and a ten-year-old girl have sex with each other, should they be indicted, convicted and locked up? Of course not. What about a ten-year-old boy and an eleven-year-old girl? Of course not. So, what about a seventeen-year-old boy and an eighteen-year-old girl? Hmm. Now we have a legal issue and the girl is potentially in serious trouble. Barring legal considerations, is this sexual coupling wrong? No, of course not. How about the seventeen-year-old boy and a nineteen-year-old girl? Nope. Twenty and fifteen? Nope. So, is there some magic age point at which normal, consensual sex between a male and a female of different ages becomes harmful? Probably not. The effect of sex between consensual partners of different ages is a matter of their mutual desire for each other and a perception that is primarily formed as a result of social customs, which vary greatly between different cultures. It has nothing to do with the people having sex. It has everything to do with the people judging them. Apparently, in our society, women have been conditioned to believe that such sexual contact implies that the younger participant is a “victim” of the older. Men have not accepted this concept, especially with regard to the version with which they can readily identify of an adult woman with an underage boy. What we have in the Sylvia Johnson case is a woman and some boys having fun, doing what they all wanted to do ... having sex. With the possible exception of the kid who ratted her out, the boys were having a good time and so was Sylvia. Maybe he was one of the boys that she wasn’t taking to her bed and he was angry for being shut out. Who knows? It is reasonably certain, however, that his motivation for informing was not his altruistic concern for his friends. If anyone believes that, I have a bridge in Brooklyn I’d like to sell them … cheap. The drug issue is a whole other question. Drugs are deadly dangerous and known to screw up kids' lives with predictable certainty. If the nasty bitch gave drugs to my son, I'd kill her. Strong memo to follow.

Posted by: Nono Namo at September 28, 2005 12:47 AM (Jf28C)

32 No, all u guys can say what u want but you guys want to know more of the story??? Well I'm a Juinor at Ralston Valley HS and it is very close to where she lived and I know people that live around her, anyways shes got like 3 daughters the oldest one I think already graduated but the other ones are like 8 and like 14, well she is sentenced to life in prison and while drivingf ot either court or jail she was drinking and let her 14 year old daughter drive and crashed on I-70 and broke her and her daughters back, and all these people saying o yea Milf and shit man no one liked that lady she was a freak and not that hot by the way.

Posted by: MSizzle at October 28, 2005 08:06 AM (usSZd)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
38kb generated in CPU 0.1754, elapsed 0.3538 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.3359 seconds, 281 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.