October 19, 2005
Karl Who? Scooter Who? Tom Who? Harriet Who?
Able Danger is heating up.
I'm going to make this an open comment thread. I would like to know what the Jawa faithful have to say about it.
Posted by: Vinnie at
11:38 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 44 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: See-Dubya at October 19, 2005 11:44 PM (6S0VS)
2
Anyone over the age of 12 shouldn't be called 'Scooter.'
Posted by: Mike at October 20, 2005 05:26 AM (ywZa8)
3
If it turns out that all Schaffer says (and others) is true, then they can't continue to blame 9/11 on Bush and Condi's "bumbling incompetence" and inability to "connect the dots". If true then the blame would lie squarely with a long standing problem in the defence hierarchy. The divulgence of Able Danger fits in with the revelations after 9/11 that these departments (CIA, FBI, etc.) were not communicating - even worse than we thought. It can't simply be ignored now and be portrayed as a new problem that came about only since the Bush Admin.
These petty accusations and threats against Schaffer are astounding though and instead of using the opportunity to clean out a rat's nest the pompous bureaucrats at the Pentagon are sweating under their collars and bungling this badly. Wheldon was right. It's become a big CYA game.
Posted by: Oyster at October 20, 2005 06:18 AM (YudAC)
4
Able Danger? what's that - - can't we just watch some more footage of Natalie Holloway?
Posted by: dave at October 20, 2005 07:39 AM (CcXvt)
5
Well, it looks like the case of the missing rats at the Ohio Statehouse has been solved. They all moved over to the Dept. of Defense.
It's looking more and more like Clinton knew about Atta and his gang prior to the 9/11 attacks. There is a bomb ready to explode here, and the truth needs to come out. Let the pieces fall where they may.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 20, 2005 10:19 AM (rUyw4)
6
JJ: There are still far too many Clinton loyalists in the Pentagon. It's not like they clean house and hire all new people as each administration begins. We need some really big cats!
Posted by: Oyster at October 20, 2005 10:44 AM (fl6E1)
7
It's funny what a full-tilt rant by Weldon on the empty floor of the House can do to push an issue into view. He's even contemplating resigning over the matter if the DIA can't stop badmouthing Shaffer and pressing bogus/trumped up charges against him.
Call me skeptical over whether Weldon would actually resign, but the underlying issue is deadly serious. What did Able Danger know and why was the information not provided to those who could/should have acted on it?
Posted by: lawhawk at October 20, 2005 11:37 AM (eppTH)
8
This could become the Watergate level event of our age, if the press doesn't manage to bury it under missing girls and seasonal weather, which they will try very hard to do, considering that it can only exonerate Bush.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 20, 2005 03:58 PM (0yYS2)
9
I don't know. Being a commom sense middler from the midwest I'm more interested in what are we going to do. This turn to politics this and politics that of personal destruction and noise making just don't register with me. the last few weeks have been all games. Just noise to me. Harriet, Able Danger, Plame, Delay it's all the politics of blame and that favorite word accountability. Bores me to death. I feel and election coming on in about 12 months which means nothing will make any sense for the next year. Politics rarely solves much that does not have to be solved again two to four years later. For instance Reagan cut taxes to choke the gov't. Bush did the same. Another thing they have in common. Both left the spending problem of that equation to the next guy. So I'm more into practical every day ideas to make things better not that we will get that.
Posted by: Howie at October 20, 2005 04:51 PM (D3+20)
10
I sense a scandal of monumental proportions here. I think there are many more people involved here than what we can possibly imagine.
But to think about all the lives wasted, the murder of our citizens, the cost of the cleanup, the loss of prestige, and the spiritual hole left in NYC and the US just makes me sick.
When I think about the technology Clinton transferred to China, the loss in Somalia where we had superior forces, and the general decline of our armed forces during the Clinton Presidency I see why we are in the mess we are in. Before all you liberals start on Bush, believe me, I'm very disappointed in him, too.
With Clinton gutting the military, and Bush letting Rumsfeld bungle the Iraqi invasion, the jihadis think they can take over the Western world. Whether they can or not does not matter, the fact that they think they can will now produce a series of gut check little conflicts that will test the resolve of all the peoples of the World who desire to live in a modern world.
If you want to see what the Islamists want, look at Darfur, where looting, rape, murder, and slavery are the theme. Is that what you liberals want? Well, that is what you will get if you don't change your thinking pretty damn quick!
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 20, 2005 06:31 PM (rUyw4)
11
I keep an Able Danger blog roll at www.qtmonster.com. I just posted a transcript of Congressman Curt Weldon's interview today on the Sean Hannity Radio Show.
Posted by: vadkins at October 20, 2005 10:54 PM (BPcQE)
12
Notwithstanding the implications of Able Danger, it needs to be remembered that Ashcroft turned down requests for counterterrorism funding by the FBI on September 10, 2001.
Posted by: StormWarning at October 21, 2005 05:09 AM (85Vr/)
13
It seems to me that most people are interesteds in promoting their political beliefs..I am a Liberal Democrat but that does not stop me from putting America first..if there was and is going on in this Able Danger investigation that provess that the Bush and Clinton Pentagon has been covering up and doing damage to America, it should be exposed and cleaned up..no matter who it hurts!
Posted by: louise starr at October 22, 2005 12:54 PM (Zl2Qs)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Stop the ACLU on the Radio
Nedd Kareiva of
Stop The ACLU will be on
WRWL Radio with Pastor Ernie Sanders to discuss the ACLU and how the Stop the ACLU bunch intends to thwart the ACLU's plans to crush America. Nedd Kareiva will be on at 9:30 PM EDT / 6:30 PM PDT.
For those not in the WRWL coverage area you can use this audio feed to tune in to the program.
Posted by: Chris Short at
11:38 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 80 words, total size 1 kb.
1
ACLU the Ateists,Communist,and Lawyers,Underground, americas own al qaeda they do more damage then all the radical islanic extremists
Posted by: sandpiper at October 20, 2005 07:42 AM (S97cI)
2
Sandpiper, Jesus was a Buddhist.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 20, 2005 07:34 PM (0yYS2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Who Doesn't Like 'Em?
Stupid criminals, that is....
OMAHA, Neb. -- An Omaha police lieutenant and an officer said they were working at the front desk of police headquarters Monday night when they noticed people sitting a car parked in a handicap parking space.
When the pair walked up to the car, they smelled what they believed to be methamphetamine.
A search proved them right.
The suspect was taken to Creighton University Medical Center, where he agreed to have two small plastic bags of meth removed from his stomach, according to a police report.
Hey, at least they were parked in the right spot....
Posted by: Vinnie at
10:42 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 108 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Why do you think they call it DOPE?
Posted by: sandpiper at October 20, 2005 01:46 PM (ba9dN)
2
Now where did you all hide my trackback?
Posted by: IO ERROR at October 20, 2005 01:52 PM (vhWf1)
3
Hm, you could try sending it through Kalsey's standalone t/b or Wizbang's manual t/b.
Posted by: Vinnie at October 20, 2005 02:14 PM (Kr6/f)
4
Any libertarian views on this ?
Posted by: john Ryan at October 21, 2005 12:35 PM (ads7K)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Where's My 20 Million A Year?
Here is what
I posted, last night, on my own blog, concerning media coverage of the Saddam trial. An excerpt:
Simply astounding. Here sits a man that is probably the last on earth who deserves any hearing whatsoever, fair or not. Here is a democratically elected government trying him in a court of law, even though he doesn't deserve it, and yet in the AP's eyes, if they don't dot every i, and cross every t, then poor Saddam is going to be abused.
Here is part of the transcript of today's Rush Limbaugh show:
Well, also today the Saddam Hussein trial started, and it's amazing to contrast the media coverage of a Saddam trial, who is a mass murderer, a man who's used poison gas and weapons of mass destruction on his own population, a man who had rape rooms and torture rooms, did not allow women any kinds of human rights or civil rights -- very few men had them in Iraq, either -- and yet when you listen to the coverage of his trial today, you would think that this guy is unjust like [sic] accused. You would think that he's brave and courageous.
CURSE YOU LIMBAUGH, GET OUT OF MY HEAD! LEAVE MY BRAIN ALONE!!!
Posted by: Vinnie at
08:17 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 220 words, total size 1 kb.
1
How long will it take? i sure hope it dont end up becoming aother rediclous fiasco like with O.J. SIMPSON or MICHEAL JACKSON
Posted by: sandpiper at October 19, 2005 08:40 PM (UwJcR)
2
Well if they don't get the i's dotted and t's crossed he didn't really kill all those people did he?
Posted by: phin at October 19, 2005 08:49 PM (DGPlf)
3
The media coverage of the Saddam trial is nothing more than dog vomit. The media eats it up, regurgitates, eats it again, ad infinium. It does not matter who it is, and Saddam is proof positive that what I say is true, the media will use them as long as they are anti-American.
The media has now reached a level so low and treasonous, I doubt they will ever be able to recover the reputation they once had.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 19, 2005 09:01 PM (rUyw4)
4
Funny how they are all are worried about a fair trial for Saddam while wanting to hang Carl Rove and Tom DeLay in the public square without any trial at all!!
Posted by: Cindy at October 19, 2005 10:00 PM (V6yAS)
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at October 19, 2005 10:01 PM (WAdBy)
6
He is a megalomaniacal, psychopath who loves to be worshipped and feared, which is why the libtards love him so much; he's one of them.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 20, 2005 03:55 PM (0yYS2)
7
But let us not forget, he was OUR friend and ally once and after Gulf War I, who helped him rebuild his destroyed oil infrastucture ? Will Rummy be called as a defense witness ? I think it farcial that the present trial is for ordering the death of about 150 men and boys who lived in the village that an assasination attempt was tried. 150 ???? why that is just another bad day in present Iraq. What do I think his puishment should be ? Life in a plexiglass cell where everyone could come and vent and show their children, a living reminder to all.
Posted by: john Ryan at October 21, 2005 12:55 PM (ads7K)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I'll show you a faux, staged, set-up story!
Check out
Junkyard Blog on the "filmmaker" (read "leftist activist and shakedown artist") who is after Tom Delay, and who has Travis County DA Ronnie Earle for his production assistant:
What better way to end his anti-DeLay film, The Big Buy, than with that visual of Rep. Tom DeLay, until recently the majority leader in the US House of Representatives, with a number plate tucked under his chin? What better way to cast Republicans, enemies both of Earle and the far left agitator Jim Schermbeck, as corrupt than with that visual? And what better to get that visual than to abuse the power of a district attorney to make sure you have the opportunity to manufacture it?
More fine detective work from the JYB. This is just the newest exhibit in the phenomenon Michelle Malkin writes about in her column "All the News is a Stage". It shouldn't really surprise anyone that lefty documentaries are just as bad.
Hey, whatever floats your boat.
Posted by: seedubya at
07:40 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 179 words, total size 1 kb.
1
And this is what masquerades as journalism in the year 2005 in the US of A. DISGUSTING! And I don't want to hear one damn liberal talking about disinformation in the Bush Administration. HYPOCRITS!
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 19, 2005 07:57 PM (rUyw4)
2
You know, the libtards are gonna keep on until a few get killed to set an example. They're just going to keep pushing until someone has had enough, and gets on top of a building in Berkeley with a sniper rifle. Not soon enough.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 20, 2005 07:33 PM (0yYS2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
British Journalist Rory Carroll Kidnapped in Iraq
The
UK Guardian is
reporting that its Baghdad correspondent, Rory Carroll, 33, is missing and it's believed he was kidnapped by a group of armed men. Carroll, an Irish citizen, is one of the more experienced journalists for the Guardian and he has been
based in Iraq for the last nine months.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
10:59 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 66 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That's the same reporter that said US forces were "out of control".
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1567737,00.html
Posted by: Ariya at October 19, 2005 06:20 PM (noCGr)
2
irony, now he's most likely going to see how "out of control" the terrorists are about to get. first hand.
Wonder who he'll be the most scared of, the U.S military, who he's most likely praying will rescue him, or Ali "behead em' all, let Allah sort em' out" .
Posted by: dave at October 19, 2005 06:44 PM (CcXvt)
3
How long do you think it will take for Al-Guardian and its friends to blame the kidnapping on American soldiers or the Jooooos in the guise of Mossad?
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 19, 2005 06:45 PM (rUyw4)
4
I hope they give him the works. He's an enemy propagandist and if he gets his head cut off, that's one video I'll download and keep.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 19, 2005 06:54 PM (0yYS2)
5
Why are they kidnapping journalists their biggist supporters but he dont belong to the New York Times or CNN
Posted by: sandpiper at October 19, 2005 08:42 PM (UwJcR)
6
Impy - Dammit Klannie, you're going to hurt'im!
Klanrooster - Vengeance will be mine!
Impy - He's not standing at attention, he's collapsed!
Klanrooster - Not after the blue perky-pills he wont.. Vengeance will be mine!!!
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at October 19, 2005 09:59 PM (WAdBy)
7
I simply don't understand what unarmed people are doing wandering around Iraq. What do they expect to happen? I wouldn't be walking around Iraq without a belt-fed machine gun. I'm not saying any of the unarmed people who have been murdered over there deserved it, but damn. I think it is a lack of common sense that gets these people into trouble. Yeah, and we'll see who is "out of control" when that dull knife they use to kill sheep starts sawing his head off. Maybe an "out of control" Special Forces squad will save his sorry ass. Oh well.
Posted by: Jacks Smirking Revenge at October 20, 2005 04:29 AM (CtVG6)
8
It just goes to show that feeding your friends to sharks won't make any difference when they come for you. As they say, appeasement is the hope that the shark will eat you last.
Those who cry "Appease, appease!", are hanged by those they try to please.
One thing that gives me pleasure is knowing that liberal dhimmis will be among the jihadotards' first victims.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 21, 2005 12:07 PM (0yYS2)
9
Well all'swellthat ends well fortunately we have solid guys like Chalabi nowOil Minister a man with a proven track record helping us
Posted by: john Ryan at October 21, 2005 09:26 PM (ads7K)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Spanish Judge Has a Don Quixote Moment
Now lets watch this peckerwood try and enforce it.
A Spanish judge has issued an international arrest order for three US soldiers whose tank fired at a Baghdad hotel during the war in Iraq, killing a Spanish journalist, a court official said Wednesday.
Jose Couso, who worked for the Spanish television network Telecinco, died April 8, 2003, after the tank crew fired a shell at the Palestine Hotel in Baghdad where many journalists were staying to cover the war.
The Spanish judge said he issued the arrest order because of a lack of judicial cooperation from the United States regarding the case.
US officials insist the soldiers believed they were being shot at when they opened fire.
Any doubt why President Bush has-quite rightfully-rejected the International Criminal Court?
Companion Opinipundit
Posted by: Traderrob at
10:41 AM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 144 words, total size 1 kb.
1
They can't keep their own home-grown terrorists under check and they flip sides because of 1 bombing.
Sure we'll hand over our soldiers to you. Sure. Ok. I'll get right on that.
It still amazes me to hear people b*tch about us not listening to the int'l court. Personally I LIKE having my American rights that the rest of the world just drools over.
Posted by: Impatient GIrl at October 19, 2005 11:34 AM (z2tgL)
2
The judge is welcome to try to come get them. Well be sure to post his arrival time at the nearest airport in GA, NC, or TX.
http://cdrsalamander.blogspot.com/2005/10/you-want-em-come-and-get-em.html
Posted by: CDR Salamander at October 19, 2005 12:40 PM (m64uD)
3
In a related move, Prime Minister Tony Blair has issued arrest warrants for Spanish nationals involved with building the Armada--whose intent was to inflict harm on citizens of Britain.
Posted by: insider at October 19, 2005 01:49 PM (hwr9z)
4
CDR,
Make that Texas, please, as I wouldn't want to miss out on this one. I can see the conquistadors coming now! This is just silly, what can the Spanish be thinking about? Has the jihad overwhelmed them already?
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 19, 2005 06:49 PM (rUyw4)
5
Yes, jj, it has. I saw a thing on TV a while back about how wonderful everything is in Spain now, especially since they pretty much lifted all immigration restrictions on muslims. Spain will be an islamic theocracy within ten years, if that long.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 19, 2005 06:56 PM (0yYS2)
6
IM,
Damn, I predicted that Sweden would be the first to fall. Then Belgium, Denmark, Norway, France, Germany, Britain, Spain, and last to fall Italy. Austria, just like before, will have to be militarily conquered. They are the only Europeans who remember their own history, and well they should, as the barbarians were at the gates of Vienna twice.
Maybe the Poles will come to the rescue again, and perhaps the spirit of Sobieski still lives in the Polish people. That's about the only hope I have after what I saw at the WH this week. Bush is falling into the PC trap along with many others in the US. We will probably have a monumental struggle here as well. Oh, well, all I can say is get ready if you aren't.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 19, 2005 07:23 PM (rUyw4)
7
He cant arrest a american citizen and we should prevent him from doing it this is a crime against our constitution we should tell the spanish judges to BUTT OUT
Posted by: sandpiper at October 19, 2005 08:44 PM (UwJcR)
8
Impy stroking the bore of the rifle, begging for Spanish fly
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at October 19, 2005 10:02 PM (WAdBy)
9
DSM
So many of your comments are nothing more than personal insults (having nothing to do with topic) with clearly evident bizarre sexual themes. Is this some kind of Freudian thing with you.
Posted by: hondo at October 20, 2005 02:53 AM (bayez)
10
Being born in Spain I am ashamed of this.I am ashamed of seeing my country of birth going from the Azores between the USA and the UK to being between Cuba and Venezuela.
This Judge is another of those leftist judges that populate the Spanish courts.
Oh the shame, well there are still 10M Spaniards that did not voted for Zapatero and his new populist regime.
Posted by: VRP at October 20, 2005 09:16 AM (R+qmK)
11
Well, aparently there is more to the story that has not been published. The Prosecutor of the National Court has put forward a motion to paralize the order of the Judge (really a magistrate or investigating judge). Aparently, Judge Santiago Pedraz has jumped over the rules and put forward the order without the case having been approuved. The Prosecutor called the actions of the Judge "an act of revenge rather than a logical judicial procedure".
Also now that the judge has been named (Santigo Pedraz) I known him to be a rather soft guy on terrorism, some of his behavior could be taken as aiding the terrorist (that is the home grown ETA).
Posted by: VRP at October 20, 2005 10:05 AM (R+qmK)
12
Thank you VRP for clarifying the situation and helping us remember that Spain is the home of El Cid. There is still a remnant of faithful in Spain. May God bless them!
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 20, 2005 10:36 AM (rUyw4)
13
DSM is a retard who likes getting banned. Apparently, he's not interested in girls, or drinking, or anything fun, although he does talk a lot about burning insects and small animals to death. He just needs to be killed for the good of humanity, but failing that, he will just get banned again.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 20, 2005 07:42 PM (0yYS2)
14
Or let the Greyrooster's boys find him. Which would set a better example for other scumbags.
Posted by: BigAl at October 23, 2005 05:19 PM (6krEN)
15
Yo, everybody there! I am a very proud Spanish, and so I would please ask all of you not to spill the beans all over us, here in Spain. We are not all so dumb retarded as this judge, or as our actual President. As VRP said, we are about 40% of the population who did not fall for all the downright lies told by the almost entirely leftist media after the Madrid train bombings, and didn't vote for that asshole we have as a President right now. Hopefully, every day more and more people seem to see how big a mistake was making him President, and hopefully he will be sacked soon.
By the way, a few ABSOLUTELY REAL facts about Zapatero:
- He spent quite a few years wandering around the Law department, trying to obtain a doctorate, but never managed to finish.
- His former schoolfriends from Ponferrada (his hometown) say he was an absurdity of a human being, interested only in his appearance.
- Although he is always bragging about how Franco's soldiers shot his grandfather during the war, few people know his mother-in-law owns a tobacco shop given to her by Franco himself as a compensation for the killing of her husband by the communists.
- In a private conversation, former Socialist Prime Minister Felipe González compaired Zapatero to a "6-year-old driving a Masseratti at 160mph through a traffic jam".
Posted by: Javier at November 03, 2005 05:34 PM (+9TNn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
WTW AH Hates Winders !!!
So I pulled a late one last night & get early boot up. Then some detectothingy says I have a bad file and needs to go. SoÂ’s I get rid of it. ItÂ’s a library. Errr..ooops. SoÂ’s I get to run that one forever program on that thar shiny
winders disk. Then the little woman starts fooling with the breaker box(hair dry and what no that's this breaker dear??) and I get to run that blue screen stuff over my disk again! Yep now I gets to run winders update.
Please stand byÂ…..
(under breath mumbling %$$#%$# delays, delays get me dual boot or reload yer ass with Red Hat you %$%$# stupid detectothingy)
Here are your White Trash Wednesday bloggers
more...
Posted by: Howie at
09:33 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 166 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: IO ERROR at October 19, 2005 11:01 AM (vhWf1)
2
I can deal with it. The said detectothingy was not very descriptive I was not really paying attention to what it said which was not much. My bad fixed.
Posted by: Howie at October 19, 2005 12:07 PM (D3+20)
3
Gee hope it wasn't me that did thjat.
Posted by: Howie at October 19, 2005 06:15 PM (D3+20)
4
If you ever need to access files quickly while a computer's having a bad day, I highly suggest a live CD, such as the
Ubuntu Linux live CD. Just stick it in, start up the computer, give it a few minutes to figure out what hardware you're working with, then you're good to go. Access files, do things online, etc. Never leave home without it!
Posted by: Chris Fritz at October 19, 2005 07:30 PM (RX2tR)
5
Cool. I'm Ok. The thing runs. I've identified the problems and solutions. variants of common stuff.
Norton don't see it.
Spybot don't see
ad aware don't see it.
Emco malware bouncer was the only one that did see it. thanks tucows.
Posted by: Howie at October 20, 2005 08:37 AM (D3+20)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Abstinence vs. Indulgence
The two most immediately rewarding things humans can do take place in the face of temptation: abstinence and indulgence. But the quality of the rewards are not comparable. Abstinence builds upon and reenforces the empowering conviction that the world is ultimately and universally just, whereas at best indulgence tolerates, and at worst promotes, the conviction that the world is ultimately unjust or indifferent to evil (or that there is no evil). This is why the writings of the Marquis de Sade, for instance, open with a longish philosophical argument that nature and the universe are indifferent to evil, and that therefore evil is merely a human convention.
Terrorism attempts to merge the near-perfect abstinence of the Stoics (the founders of genuine liberalism) and the Christian martyrs with the indulgence of de Sade... and winds up entirely on the side of de Sade. Veiled within the justifications and grandiosly posturing rhetoric of Qutb, Bin Laden, Zawahiri and Zarqawi, claiming that they represent the manifestation of God's righteousness, is the very real conviction that God must either be indifferent, or as evil as their own darkest lusts. It is the ultimate cynicism, and little wonder that on some levels it finds itself allied with the western philosophical and ideological tradition that created both les indulgents and les enrages.
(Cross-posted by Demosophist to Demosophia and Anticipatory Retaliation)
Posted by: Demosophist at
08:44 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 230 words, total size 2 kb.
1
What if self denial is your fetish though? Moderation in all things, especially moderation.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 19, 2005 06:58 PM (0yYS2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
UN Weapons Ban Is Toothless
(Sana'a, Yemen) In a report from last week, it was confirmed that the Yemeni government sold weapons to Somalia in violation of a UN imposed ban. Discussions of the issue between the UN Security Council Weapons Experts Committee and the Yemeni government have consisted primarily of bickering over semantics with no consensus. Furthermore, according to the
Yemen Times, there will likely be no consequences.
The difference of opinion is getting Yemen into hot water, but with international resources already so overstretched international grumbling is unlikely to have any real teeth.
Of course, the international grumblers are the UN weapons experts.
In summary, the government of Yemen knowingly violated a UN imposed weapons ban by selling arms to Somalia. When accused of the violation, the Yemeni officials merely argued, fully expecting no further action by the toothless United Nations. To add insult, the country's major newspaper publishes the fact that the UN is considered to be just a bunch of grumblers and there's no expectation that it will do anything.
I think the Yemenis are on to something.
Companion post at Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
01:01 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 189 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It will take more, many more, of the same type of egregious violations, flaunted publicly, for people to wake up and see how the UN is not only not useful, and not only useless, but actually has a negative impact in global relations. The UN does not hinder criminal nations, but rather those who would stop them.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 19, 2005 03:30 AM (0yYS2)
2
Yeah but they got a real stern letter I'm sure. And according to Scrappleface, Kofi Annan insists he has fulfilled his role of fostering global peace by
"holding meetings, eating in fine restaurants and speaking very softly in a charming accent." Jeez, what do you people want?
Posted by: Oyster at October 19, 2005 05:34 AM (YudAC)
3
Speaking of Kofi, ever notice that when he talks, his eyes swivel back and forth like he's a cornered rat looking for a place to run to? I have a sixth sense about people, call it what you will, but I can tell within a very short time what someone is like, and I'm rarely wrong by any amount. I have always been an observer of people and have met all sorts, and I use things like body language, manner, patterns, and tone of speech, word usage, etc., to determine whether someone is honest or not.
I have been watching Kofi for a long time, and I can tell you that he has never spoken a word of truth in his life. His speech is always slow and guarded; he is hesitant because he must lie with every breath, and lying takes far more brain power than the truth, because one uses the creative side of the brain to lie, instead of the logical side, so he has to think about what he's going to say, and it's apparent that he's not very bright, so this is hard work for him.
As I mentioned, his eyes are always busy; looking out in case trouble should erupt. He is paranoid, and rightly so, because I'm sure that carrying that much ethical baggage would be a heavy burden. He probably worries constantly and looks over his shoulder in case justice should be catching up to him. He knows he has betrayed the oppressed peoples of the world, and it bothers him, but not because he is at heart a good man with a conscience, but because he knows that he deserves to be brought to justice, and is afraid.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 19, 2005 06:10 AM (0yYS2)
4
The weapons ban is a farce so now the UN want to disarm all americans in fact next year theres going to be a meeting by the UN to discuse the idea of world wide gun control and disarming us all its time to just pull out of the evil UN and its tyranical plans
Posted by: sandpiper at October 19, 2005 08:38 AM (g0rz7)
5
Here in NYC, I've always viewed the UN as an interesting tourist attaction with some really beautiful gardens and a great view of the river. Other than that - is there anthing else?
Posted by: hondo at October 19, 2005 10:30 AM (bayez)
6
This whole scenario with Yemen and many other rogue states is being and will be played out for the next I don't know how many years. What is really at play here is a lack of fear on the part of rogue states no matter the location, whether No. Korea or Iran.
It doesn't take a genius to see that three watershed events caused these problems to mushroom, the first being the takeover of the US embassy by Iran, the second being the defeat of the Russians in Afghanistan, and the other being the withdrawal of US forces from Somalia.
The former superpowers are not seen as super when either lack of will or avoidance of even light casualties cause national and international interests to be abandoned. The radical Muslims have stepped into the breach, and they will be difficult to dislodge. The Europeans couldn't even defeat a rump state like Serbia, much less confront a determined enemy.
The Chinese may be the wild card here in that they will be a challenge for the Muslims on their left flank. But I still see a long, hard struggle for people who desire a modern culture.
T
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 19, 2005 10:30 AM (rUyw4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 18, 2005
World To End Tomorrow, Russell Stover's, Pamprin Hardest Hit
Great news, men (and our
good gay counterparts)!
The opposite gender's most feared weapon of mass destruction has been disarmed!
We now can control the remote all four weeks of the month!
Arise, O men of the West!
Posted by: Vinnie at
10:26 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 56 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I can tell you this Mr. Vinnie, you come down to Our Lady of the Meadowlands and spout this type of rubbish and IÂ’ll open up a can of CORNED BEEF WOOP ASS on your heretic behind.
I don’t watch many of today’s movies, but I’ll tell you when I saw Monte Python go into that musical number “Every Sperm Is Sacred” I wanted to call my mum in county cork and just say thanks. You be sure to go to 3pm reconciliation this Saturday and take your penitence like a man.
Imagine a good Italian Catholic boy passing out birth control to get his filthy hands on a channel clicker. Why, IÂ’m inclined to search you out and teach you the catechism of the Church the hard way. I have half a mind to call that Greyrooster fella and have him show you his farm implements.
The road to heaven is narrow and rarely does a man enter it with a channel clicker.
You reflect on that you Protestant sounding poster of filth.
I expect better from ya tomorrow.
Posted by: Fr. Seamus O'Malley at October 18, 2005 11:15 PM (6mUkl)
2
Father Seamus, is that really you?
GET AWAY FROM ME YOU SICK BASTARD, HAVEN'T YOU DONE ENOUGH???
Posted by: Altar Boy at October 18, 2005 11:22 PM (Kr6/f)
3
hate to break it to you, Vin, but I've been on this for years and I still own the remote......
Posted by: caltechgirl at October 19, 2005 12:28 AM (X81mG)
4
A man's obsession with the remote is merely an extension of his penis and represents his hostility toward his mother. Here, take these pills. You'll forget you even have a penis.
Posted by: Dr. Freud at October 19, 2005 05:51 AM (YudAC)
5
Not bleed for a week, when would my poor body get any rest at night!! That's the part I look forward to once a month!
Men are dominating the world..auk!!!
Posted by: Deb at October 19, 2005 09:53 AM (JaMdb)
6
Deb,
You can move to Britain. The latest research released by someone in Britain and posted last week here at the Jawa reported that men in Britain think about sex more often than women, but only perform the act half as much. I'll let you do the arithmetic, but something just ain't right. Anyhow, away to the old country you may go if you get any tireder(is that a word?).
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 19, 2005 10:06 AM (rUyw4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Vets Day Cancelled at Berkeley.
Ok if you are so far left that
Berkeley don't want you to speak. Well I guess that says it all.
SunHerald:
WALNUT CREEK, Calif. - (KRT) - Berkeley's Veterans Day ceremony, scheduled for Nov. 11, was abruptly canceled on Monday because the volunteer organizing committee split over the political content. At issue was a proposal by the chairman, singer/songwriter Country Joe McDonald, to have Bill Mitchell, a co-founder of Cindy Sheehan's organization, Gold Star Families for Peace, as the keynote speaker.
Others : California Conservative and Michelle Malkin.
Oh so this is Why CindyÂ’s in Berkeley. Also it looks like President Bush will have more than one Turkey this Thanksgiving.
Speaking of CC, What you really need to know to understand the Iraqi Elections and why the MSM doesnÂ’t tell you.
Related kinda Michael Yon is back in Iraq.
Terror hoax perp caught in Mexico.
CNN:
Mexican authorities arrested Jose Ernesto Beltran Quinonez, 34, early Saturday in Mexicali, a border city about 120 miles east of San Diego, the FBI said. A three-count indictment charges Beltran with perpetrating a terrorist hoax and making false statements about an alleged plot to smuggle a nuclear warhead into the United States from Mexico
The latest on the OK University bombing MSM VS blogs with Michelle and Mark Tapscott.
Jawa Report posts From Rusty on the subject here.
And that's the way it is or was or what I had time for.
Posted by: Howie at
07:57 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 247 words, total size 2 kb.
1
More from the peoples republic of berkeley americans own ho chi min city just what a disgracful place and its in the vertial same area as honoi on the bay
Posted by: sandpiper at October 18, 2005 08:33 PM (swaoX)
2
Country Joe? Is that smug, faux-populist, hippie dumba$$ still taking up space? I'd have thought that pot-cured ham would have perished in a half-way house trying to light a doobie over a gas stove long ago.
Posted by: D. Carter at October 18, 2005 08:41 PM (xT77+)
3
You know what's so funny here. The liberals actually think they are supporting the troops when they go out and get a bunch of crazies to call our troops baby killers and such. It's hilarious that they are so stupid and full of themselves. Yep, you can bet the troops feel the love they get from places like Berkeley!
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 18, 2005 08:50 PM (rUyw4)
4
The amazing thing about this Berkley thing is that a collection of nit-wits see Veterans Day (a non-partisan event to say the least) as an opportunity to USE (hi-jack, pimp, whore, whatever etc.) for their own purposes without batting an eye. Inappropriate is an understatement - they are oblivious to the fact that they are telling everyone else (like er - the veterans) to bend over or get lost.
Berkley is an extremely liberal town - for them to cancel indicates that a majority of the lib/left even recognized how stupid this left stunt was and bailed out to prevent personal embarrassment.
Posted by: hondo at October 18, 2005 11:18 PM (bayez)
5
I'm glad they dumped the idea, because as a veteran, I don't want any goddamn stupid filthy hippies to even breathe on Veteran's Day, much less have an event. God I hate liberals. They should all be puirged for the good of society. Maybe we could grind them up and ship them to Africa to feed the starving people there, solving two problems at once.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 19, 2005 06:16 AM (0yYS2)
6
I've never been a link whore,
BUT I'm pissed and it was too much to say here....
Posted by: Oyster at October 19, 2005 06:37 AM (YudAC)
7
The fact that Berzerkeley even allowed Joe on the committee is a clue to their seriously deranged messed-up-ness. Joe is a second generation Communist agitator, his radical-red parents named him after Joseph Stalin - a fact he proudly declared in a newspaper article years ago.
Posted by: -keith in mtn. view at October 19, 2005 10:35 AM (T85lV)
8
Mr. and Mrs. McDonald wanted to name their son after a man of Peace and an advocate of free speech. Joseph StalinÂ….what a great choice.
Not so peaceful, not so free with the speech, but the health care was great!
Posted by: Brad at October 19, 2005 11:25 AM (3OPZt)
9
tHEY CAN COME TO etna calfornia WERE HOLDING A VETERANS DAY PARADE and were not anything like the PEOPLES REBUBLIC OF BERKLEY
Posted by: sandpiper at October 19, 2005 08:48 PM (UwJcR)
10
Country Joe served a full 3 year hitch in
the regular Navy in Japan in 1959-1962.
He is an honorably discharged Petty Officer.
For years he has worked for Veterans rights.
He is a family man and father of 5.
His parents were communists he is not.
Posted by: Ron at October 20, 2005 12:15 PM (7k5kk)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
One more: AQ in Iraq's webmaster deleted--UPDATE
Good news on the cyberwar front: top Al Qaeda in Iraq web talent gets taken down in a US raid--which may be why the referendum weekend was so quiet.
Big Lizards got the story.
Jawa Report Value Added: BigLiz links to this MSNBC report of the capture, which contains this wonderful example of MSM wafflery, emphasis mine:
But, the news also circulates on a fascinating and, some would say, disturbing Web site operated by al-Qaida.
Some would say a site featuring graphic footage of suicide bombings and beheadings and assassination plans is "disturbing", yes. Some would.
UPDATE: Our own Howie linked this yesterday and for some reason I got it into my thick skull that it was a different website. Duhh. Well, it's still big news.
Posted by: seedubya at
03:46 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 140 words, total size 1 kb.
A Quick Sandcrawler PSA
I has just been revealed to me that now is the time for the Jawa Report to issue its unofficially official opinion concerning the vacant Supreme Court seat.
The officially unofficial opinion is thus:
We, the squeaky voiced short guys in the brown robes and cheap flashlights for eyes, do hereby vehemently oppose the nomination of John Roberts to replace Sandra Day O'Connor on the Supreme Court.
We now return you to your current psychosis, already in progress.
Posted by: Vinnie at
03:32 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 86 words, total size 1 kb.
British Conservative makes tasty fags for Kim Jong Il
Now, I'm using that word in its British slang meaning of "cigarette", so don't go all Andrew Sullivan on me.
Interesting story in the Guardian (h/t AmSpec Blog) about a secret cigarette factory deep inside North Korea operated by British American Tobacco. The factory is apparently pretty damned illegal and even if it's not, BAT needs to be run out of business for collaborating with Mordor.
The political implications of this, however, are potential dynamite. Kenneth Clarke is currently running to lead the do-nothing, useless British conservative party. Clarke is pretty much "conservative" in the same way Chirac's party in France is "conservative": maybe a little less statist than Labour at home, but anti-Iraq war and not pro-American either. And Clarke is, outside of Parliament, a paid apologist for British American Tobacco.
Interestingly, this isn't the first time Clarke's in trouble over this issue; he's gotten burned doing the same thing in Burma. If this brings him down, good riddance.
It's a shame that Britain's conservative party isn't dedicated to conserving those wonderful British ideas that have brought liberty to so much of the world--Burke, Locke, Smith, Hume--but has (with the exception of Thatcher) embraced a snobbish version of socialism lite. They have recently gone through several new party chairmen and tried to remake themselves time and again, but the conservatism they espouse each time has much more in common with the effete, statist, snobbish continental conservatism than it does with a robust American-style vision of limited government, personal responsibility, and strong defense. Clarke is anti-Iraq war and pro-Europe, and would probably continue the Tories' disastrous streak.
Maybe it's time for a change, lads?
Posted by: seedubya at
03:13 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 292 words, total size 2 kb.
1
CINO! The British conservatives are the worst possible, not really conservative at all, but just a mirror image of the Liberal Party. One wonders why any true conservative would bother to vote for them at all.
The Brits are in dire need of a healthy conservative party. I can just imagine what Winston Churchill would say if he saw the mess Britain is in today. I talked to several radical Muslims last night, and all of them had IP addresses in Britain and Canada, and they all called for the destruction of the countries they are living in. And I will bet they are all living on welfare.
If Britain and Canada do not wise up quick, and I mean real quick, they will find themselves either at war with radical Muslims inside their own countries or else living under Sharia Law. Neither possibility will be paladable for the British or Canadians.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 18, 2005 03:39 PM (rUyw4)
2
I'd love to know where you get your info on the UK, because it is woefully inaccurate. Have you been reading the Guardian and believing it all?!
Do you mean the conservative party is "anti-Iraq war and not pro-American either" or just Ken Clarke? I think you might find one of the reasons that the Tories did so badly in the last election was the voters were well aware that the Tories went right along with Blair in the run-up to the war, and only started making anti-war noises when it seemed that it might (but ultimately wasn't) politically expedient. the Tories were quite pro-war when they thought it might suit them. Typically the Tories fall over themselves to praise the US too, so I don't know where you get this anit-US thing from. If it has anything to do with the attitude towards your current thicker-than-a-door-stop-but-less-useful president, that might be because, well, there really isn't anything to praise. Or, perhaps it's because he is so woefully unpopular in the rest of the ENTIRE world (including Britain- oddly enough) that it would be political suicide to say anything nice about him. Anyway, since when was being pro-US the litmus test of conservatism? Why can't conservatives the world over be right (the real - right on right) and you American conseratives be wrong? Oh, that's right, because you are ALWAYS right. But we're the elitist snobs - silly me.
Ken was anti-war and he's pro-Europe - I'll give you that. But, please don't try to sound like you follow or understand British politics with all this "effete, statist blah blah blah." You clearly don't know the first thing about my country. OH, and one last thing, Ken got defeated in the leadership battle today by the way so I think your
"The political implications of this, however, are potential dynamite"
statement might have just expired faster than one of Ken's dodgy fags.
BTW Jesusland - you are clearly as mad as a box of frogs.
Posted by: A Brit at October 18, 2005 04:08 PM (IKGiV)
3
Brit, I lived in your country for nearly two years and watched William Hague floundering around on the Beeb every night, trying and failing to find the right note to bring down Blair without actually doing anything conservative. Duncan Smith was no better.
And yes, I'm largely talking about the strongly Europhile and anti-bush Clarke wing of the party, but even the Spectator--besides the Sun and the Daily Torygraph edit pages one of the few conservative outlets in the UK--opposed the war, bashes Bush, and oozes contempt for yee-ha Americanism. Everybody but Mark Steyn, that is.
Posted by: See-Dubya at October 18, 2005 04:41 PM (+sqIa)
4
I have never seen a mad frog.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 18, 2005 05:13 PM (rUyw4)
5
Oh Noes!~ The British do not like the American President, but the American's love your ponce of a Prime Minister!!
Next you'll tell us the U.S lost the respect of France?
Posted by: dave at October 18, 2005 07:01 PM (CcXvt)
6
A Brit,
Do you call yourself a conservative? I don't in any way mean to be disrespectful, I am just curious. What would a conservative in Britain today think about Hobbes, Locke, or Churchill? About the right to self defence(your spelling), the right to own a firearm, the right to free speech unemcumbered by racial or gender considerations, the right to own property, the one man, one vote rule, and the right of the majority rule with protections for the minority(and I don't mean race or gender).
I am curious about many things, including frogs(as I've caught many bullfrogs and ate a few), and quite frankly enjoy them immensely when I see them in my wife's flower beds eating insects. And you may call me a mad frog anytime, because I would never take that as an insult, but as an offhand compliment. After all, think about all those princes who were turned into frogs destined to come back as a prince again. Watch out, Harry!
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 18, 2005 08:03 PM (rUyw4)
7
England needs another MAGRET THATCHER or WINSTON CHURCHILL its run by a palament of fools
Posted by: sandpiper at October 18, 2005 08:36 PM (swaoX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Whoa.
Howdy. I've been in communicado for a while (Communicado, Okla., pop. 459) but it doesn't look like I've missed much. Miers is a cipher, steady progress in Iraq, media are weasels, Bush is on the ropes and flailing...
Oh. Wait. Looks like he's connected, with a strong right to the "Bush is a squishbag" conservatives:
Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said his department aims without exception to expel all those who enter the United States illegally.
"Our goal at DHS (Homeland Security) is to completely eliminate the 'catch and release' enforcement problem, and return every single illegal entrant, no exceptions.
It's about time. If I were a real grouch I would say Bush doesn't get any points for this, since he's just agreeing to enforce existing law. And I'm still skeptical enough to "trust, but verify" on this statement. I want to see some how and when to back up the what.
But if this pans out, it's great news. Even better is that this news comes straight from the top at Homeland Security. While immigration-legal and illegal- is a complex problem, it is primarily a national security issue. It was important in peacetime, but after Sept. 11 there's no excuse for incentivizing illegal immigration--and failing to control the borders-- as we have done. Even the CIA has said so.
Just this rhetoric alone shows that the Norm Mineta racial pussyfooting that crippled aviation security doesn't still paralyze White House thinking.
PS I wonder whether this was in response to the Right's piling on Bush about Miers? Is this a sop to pacify his base? If so, sop me some more. Sop me real good, and sop me hard. Sop me like I've never been sopped before.
more...
Posted by: seedubya at
01:30 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 340 words, total size 2 kb.
1
How many al queda are crossing the borders with the illegal aleins?
Posted by: sandpiper at October 18, 2005 01:45 PM (e/auS)
2
From what I can tell of Chertoff's statement it is not nearly as meaningful as it seems. Chertoff comments were in relation to illegals who are captured as they cross over the border from Mexico. It sounds like we did not send them all back to Mexico - but apparently released some in the U.S. for lack of a temporary holding capacity. It does not appear that his comments call for expelling all illegals who are currently in this country. Such a policy would contradict Bush's proposed amnesty program. Further, it would put a knife in the RNC's plan to woo hispanics int this country into the Republican party. So, in sum, it is a helpful improvement, but a minor one (and one that I don't think most American's were even aware needed to be done).
Posted by: Cruiser at October 18, 2005 02:09 PM (L11K0)
3
I hate to be a party pooper too, but it also does not address the lack of boder patrol guards and all the people who get across undetected. This is like putting lipstick on a pig.
Posted by: Oyster at October 18, 2005 02:33 PM (fl6E1)
4
The AFP article linked by Drudge is wrong.
Chertoff was only referring to OTMs: "Other than Mexicans". They're currently given a notice to appear and released. Then, almost all don't show up.
Note, for instance, that he didn't pledge to crack down on those who employ illegals.
And, he pimped Bush's "guest" worker plan.
Details
here.
Regarding the second comment, here's more on the
"Hispanic vote" myth.
Posted by: Illegal immigration news at October 18, 2005 03:15 PM (m+wiY)
5
There will be no serious immigration reform as long as Republican and Democratic businessmen continue to make a forture off illegal immigrants. And don't tell me these people are just doing jobs no one else will do. No, these people are just doing jobs that no one else will do for slave wages. When enough money is offered, the jobs will be taken, but most Americans do not live 20+ to a trailer or substandard house as many Mexicans are doing.
These Mexicans are driving down the wages on numerous jobs, and are not only keeping Americans in poverty, but adding a tremendous burden on our hospitals and schools. It is past time that a stop was put to illegal immigration.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 18, 2005 03:47 PM (rUyw4)
6
Don't forget the obligatory "Sa-lute!"
Posted by: Chrees at October 18, 2005 10:35 PM (+sNxt)
7
I will believe it when I see it.
On another note - even with porous borders and immigration problems up the wahzoo .. and AQ and the like just dying to see blood flow on Main Street America - it has been "quiet" for 4 years now.
I don't believe its "luck". Somebody somewhere somehow someway is doing their job - "quietly".
Posted by: hondo at October 18, 2005 11:30 PM (bayez)
8
yeah and I think they are going to be able to stop the estimated 10,000 tons of drugs from coming in each year.Strong penalties against the people who hire them is the only way of managing the problem. And no thank you to any legal loopholes. i.e. "we are actually an off shore entity"
Posted by: john Ryan at October 21, 2005 01:32 PM (ads7K)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Baltimore's McHenry and Harbor Tunnels Closed
A terrorist threat against tunnels along I-95 has prompted closing of said tunnels. Developing....
ABCNEWS:
Information about a potential attack, ABC News has learned, came from a previously reliable source two or three days ago. The city of Baltimore is in the process of taking some additional security precautions, while the federal government is analyzing the credibility of the threat.
We'll see, the terrorists like to spread threats. Threats are effective as a tool to upset the population. That is after you actually blow stuff up. Better safe than sorry eh.. In fact I'm so shaken I'm going to go eat and fill up my car or is that just Dave's lunch doing me that way.
Updated: I'm full as a tick and the tunnels have been reopened.
Posted by: Howie at
11:21 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 139 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Howie,
There's a new terror alert every time Bush and company get in a jam. They're playing us like a fiddle.
Posted by: menenzes' ghost at October 18, 2005 12:30 PM (VP+X3)
2
Goering, for those unfamiliar with history, was the commander in chief of the Luftwaffe in Nazi Germany during WWII. He said:
"Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country that determine policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger."
Hermann Goering
Posted by: menenzes' ghost at October 18, 2005 12:51 PM (VP+X3)
3
"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such a time as the State can shield people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."
Joseph Goebbles, German Minister of Propaganda
Posted by: menenzes' ghost at October 18, 2005 12:57 PM (VP+X3)
4
The tunnels have been reopened. False alarm, yet again.
Posted by: menenzes' ghost at October 18, 2005 01:02 PM (VP+X3)
5
why ya wanna do me like that greg?
Posted by: Howie at October 18, 2005 01:15 PM (D3+20)
6
Mike,
No offense intended. I just call 'em they way I see
it. Nothing personal.
WTF you mean you shit all over your support. The minute my back is turned you go all off. You are supposed to be banned and I let you have an inch you took a mile. Cost me real work time too. In other words when I could have been making progress I was babysitting you.
Posted by: Howie at October 18, 2005 01:33 PM (D3+20)
7
It's always ironic when the left comes in decrying the "False alarms" by the Government.
Were they not the ones calling for accountability because President Bush didn't act on the intelligence in the August 6th Memo ("Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S" )
Can't have it both ways, Idiot.
Posted by: dave at October 18, 2005 01:34 PM (CcXvt)
8
Goering is a bad analogy to apply here.
"All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked,..." We WERE attacked. Several times. It can only be ignored for so long. And Dave's right - damned if you do, damned if you don't. Some people are just never happy. It's easy to pretend as we did for decades. And Goebbles as well -
"It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent,..." No repression going on. As a matter of fact, the dissent is the loudest voice you hear. The state doesn't own the papers as they did in Germany and as they still do in so many other countries.
Why people keep comparing us to pre-war Germany is beyond me. You see parallels. I see dumb people.
Posted by: Oyster at October 18, 2005 02:46 PM (fl6E1)
9
"It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent..."
I like the way Oyster dissects the quote down to just a fragment of a sentence to twist the point.
The sentence goes on to read, "...for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."
That's kind of an important part of the quote.
Posted by: menenzes' ghost at October 18, 2005 06:20 PM (VP+X3)
10
Yep, Greg, the most important part. So when are you going to start telling the truth? That's kinda important to most of us here at the Jawa.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 18, 2005 08:14 PM (rUyw4)
11
Are there people who think this blog needs a daily dose of stupidity? Greg is a fucking moron. There are stark raving mad bums on streetcorners who are far smarter and more articulate than him, and don't have to rely on cut-n-paste to make a statement. Greg, kill yourself, please, for the good of the gene pool, because you're existence is depressing the global IQ by a couple of points.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 18, 2005 08:20 PM (0yYS2)
12
Why do we continue to belong to the biggist hide out of terrorists the UN?
Posted by: sandpiper at October 18, 2005 08:38 PM (swaoX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Trials And Tribulations
Saddam
set to go on trial Wednesday.
Some questions:
Will the MSM cover this like they covered Scott Peterson, or even Martha Stewart?
Can he make things easier on himself if he produces a Heisman Trophy and vows to go after the real killers?
If he's convicted, but gets spared the death penalty, will he still be isolated, or will he be placed in an Iraqi federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison?
Posted by: Vinnie at
07:10 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 75 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'd hope he'd get the third option and they'd put him in a cell with "Ali Bubba."
Posted by: Seth at October 18, 2005 07:23 AM (KeFmK)
2
You see, because he didn't steal a red stapler, he should escape the death penalty. Instead, he should be locked up with a guy named Michael Bolton.
Posted by: lawhawk at October 18, 2005 10:12 AM (eppTH)
3
Option three. And he should be made to wear a female camel costume during encounters with "Ali Bubba".
Posted by: Oyster at October 18, 2005 11:35 AM (fl6E1)
Posted by: sortapundit at October 18, 2005 05:14 PM (F1nba)
5
Will it be the trial of the century like with O.J. Simpson? or will it be a nurimburgh type trial? HANG HIM HANG HIM
Posted by: sandpiper at October 18, 2005 08:41 PM (swaoX)
6
Hah! Sandpiper, LOL!
Maybe they'll tape a scene of his galloping slowly down a highway on a camel, with half the Iraqi police following him, ala the OJ debacle.
Personally, as "unlawful" as I may come off, I'm half hoping they'll use the same approach to Saddam that the Germans used to see to Nicholas Baader and Gudrun Enslin, thus circumventing a coming massive dog & pony show.
Posted by: Seth at October 18, 2005 10:00 PM (+YZMv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Egypt Builds Anti-Terror Fence
(Cairo) As a result of being a target for terrorists, the popular tourist destination of Sharm El-Sheikh will be a city surrounded by a security fence.
From ArabNews.com:
Egypt has started building a wire fence around Sharm El-Sheikh's tourist spots in a bid to prevent attackers from crossing into the Red Sea resort that was hit by deadly bombings in July, a security official said yesterday. "The fence aims to block cars from entering tourist areas except from four designated points and thus prevent possible terror attacks," the official said on condition of anonymity.
The fence would span 20 kilometers, stand one-and-a-half meters high, and be patrolled by security forces, the official said. He said work started on Saturday but did not say when it would end. Once the fence is complete, access to the city will be restricted to police-monitored entry points, equipped with state-of-the-art explosive detection equipment, he said.
Obviously, the
question has to be pondered of how the Egyptian fence is any different from the wall being constructed by the Israelis for the same reason. And, the last I checked, every group that can sniff a goat from the European Union to the Arab League and to the United Nations has denounced the Israeli wall as the inhumane "Apartheid Wall."
Will these groups now also denounce the Egyptian fence? I think not. The opposition newspaper Al-Wafd in Egypt, however, did ask the question and remarked that the fence would only attract terrorists. We'll just have to wait to see how the rest of the critics respond.
[Update 10/20/05]
(From Ritzy) It seems that news of the fence was incorrect or plans have changed. According to this report, Governor Mustafa Afifi of South Sinai said that 80cm concrete walls are being constructed to keep out the camels and prevent accidents. Evidently, terrorists will continue to be allowed access to Sharm El-Sheikh as long as they don't travel by camel.
Companion post at Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
05:27 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 329 words, total size 3 kb.
1
The only difference is that the Israelis did it to protect the very lives of all their people. Egypt is doing it to protect tourists because they spend money there. And they call us capitalistic pigs?
Posted by: Oyster at October 18, 2005 06:14 AM (YudAC)
2
Sharm is popular with foreign tourists, but it's even more popular with people from the region. So I think this boils down to another case of it being okay for muslims to repel attacks from other muslims, while when it's non-muslims doing the repelling, well that's just islamophobic and down right wrong. I'm no border security expert, but I'm not all that certain about how effective a fence just 5 feet in height will be.
Posted by: Graeme at October 18, 2005 10:50 AM (N5vCl)
3
Any tourist spending money is still a tourist. If they cared about Muslims killing Muslims, they'd erect fences all over the Middle East. They're protecting a major source of income. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with that. I AM saying there's a pot and kettle analogy here.
Posted by: Oyster at October 18, 2005 11:44 AM (fl6E1)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at October 18, 2005 11:44 AM (8e/V4)
5
Most upset would Sinai's Bedouin boys be, who no longer can watch the Italian ladies when they're swimming in thongs. Outrage! And the land actually belongs to them.
Seriously guys, you seem to forget sometimes that this country has been deeling with Muslim terrorists longer than most other countries. Indeed so effectively that the big terror brains are now fighting in other countries, BUT, the people of Egypt are AT LEAST as bothered by the terrorists as you are.
I know it is easier for you to grasp it if you make a dualims out of it; e.g. Muslim vs. Non-Muslim, but that's not what it is about; it's bastards against decent people and the bastards happen to have hijacked a religion.
You ought to check my latest posts also:
http://missmabrouk.blogspot.com/2005/10/professor-of-death.html
http://missmabrouk.blogspot.com/2005/10/egypts-mujahideen-and-pig-priests.html
thanks / ritzy
Posted by: Ritzy Mabrouk at October 18, 2005 12:46 PM (DI4Qj)
6
I agree Oyster, the pot and kettle analogy is there and there are several reasons behind the double standard. Bottomline is, the double standard is glaringly obvious.
Posted by: Graeme at October 18, 2005 02:16 PM (N5vCl)
7
"Indeed so effectively that the big terror brains are now fighting in other countries,..."
Indeed so effectively that only government approved and sponsored terror is allowed.
Yes, I believe that the people of Egypt are tired of it, but it seems a majority of the people in Egypt are only tired of it in Egypt. Not nearly as much concern for it when it happens to infidels.
Posted by: Oyster at October 18, 2005 02:56 PM (fl6E1)
8
Should we build a fence on our borders to keep out illegal aleins?
Posted by: sandpiper at October 18, 2005 08:42 PM (swaoX)
9
Don't forget the little apartheid fence Spain has constructed around its colony in North Africa.
Posted by: babs at October 19, 2005 09:17 AM (fAmiP)
10
Now the governor of South Sinai says it's not a fence, just something to keep the Camels out!
http://missmabrouk.blogspot.com/2005/10/fence-around-sharm-not-true.html
Posted by: Ritzy Mabrouk at October 19, 2005 10:00 PM (VFYHW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 17, 2005
Blog Sabbath Caption Contest: Good News Edition
Caption this photo of Iraqis counting votes in yesterday's Constitutional Referendum:

Fatwas will be issued Monday afternoon/evening.
Or mid-afternoon.
Or mid-late-afternoon.
Possibly early evening.
Even mid-late-early evening.
Or maybe at dusk.
Fatwas are hereby issued:
"Got a few absentee ballots here from some guys named Kos, Willis and Atrios. They're all marked 'No'. And they spelled 'no' wrong." by sortapundit
"Hey! This one says Hillary Clinton!" by Marcus Aurelius ("First principles, Clarice. Read Marcus Aurelius. Of each particular thing ask: what is it in itself? What is its nature? What does he do, this man you seek?" - Hannibal Lecter. sorry, couldn't resist.)
"Hey! What are we supposed to do with all these AOL CDs?" by Just Plain Joe
Honorable mention:
"Faisal, while doing his bit for democracy, secretly wonders and dreads how long it will take before someone notices his shirt matches the drapes." by Mr. Venom, who frightens me.
Dishonorable mention:
A off topic blatant link whorage by someone named Ritzy. Who shall henceforth be known as Ditzy.
Excellent entries from all, you're all number one in my book, and I gotta mighty thick book.
Posted by: Vinnie at
08:04 PM
| Comments (35)
| Add Comment
Post contains 201 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I take one one one 'cause you left me
And two two two for my family
And 3 3 3 for my heartache
And 4 4 4 for my headaches
And 5 5 5 for my lonely
And 6 6 6 for my sorrow
And 7 7 7 for no tomorrow
And 8 8 8 I forget what 8 was for
And 9 9 9 for a lost god
And 10 10 10 for everything everything everything everything
Posted by: MonkMojo at October 16, 2005 02:07 AM (sWjGN)
2
Hey man, this voting process we got from Florida is the greatest!
Posted by: Bubbe at October 16, 2005 03:56 AM (cbAi4)
3
"Hmmm ... what would Mullah Daley do ... ?"
Posted by: FrauBudgie at October 16, 2005 07:22 AM (+M6+7)
4
MonkMojo should win just because he's so cool...
"Oh, and he're s write-in for 'return Saddam to us'. Who the Hell is 'Sheehan'?"
Posted by: Gordon at October 16, 2005 07:43 AM (dEFhD)
5
Who's this Chad guy and why is he hanging out behind me?
One for the money... one for the show... one to get ready... and away we go...
Achmed, you know that those jedi mind tricks wont work on me... so stop saying "These aren't the votes you're looking for."
Posted by: lawhawk at October 16, 2005 08:31 AM (DmEnp)
6
Hey man, your face looks a little blurry.
Posted by: Jane at October 16, 2005 08:32 AM (6krEN)
7
Amir, look! Another write in for Cindy Sheehan!
Posted by: CDR Salamander at October 16, 2005 08:34 AM (m64uD)
8
Got a few absentee ballots here from some guys named Kos, Willis and Atrios. They're all marked 'No'. And they spelled 'no' wrong.
Posted by: sortapundit at October 16, 2005 08:56 AM (F1nba)
9
What's with all these votes for Al Gore?
Posted by: BoDiddly at October 16, 2005 09:47 AM (B5UQ6)
10
Hey!
This one says Hillary Clinton!
Posted by: Marcus Aurelius at October 16, 2005 09:47 AM (IP175)
11
Im holding two queens and three kings and a ace whats you got there?
Posted by: sandpiper at October 16, 2005 09:48 AM (QagY6)
12
They vote no, we win. They vote yes, we win. Man, democracy is awesome!
Posted by: Jim at October 16, 2005 10:34 AM (iD0gu)
13
Omar tries to take the pot by calling all-in with just a queen high in the Baghdad Hold 'Em national tournament.
Posted by: Jim at October 16, 2005 10:53 AM (iD0gu)
14
By Allah's beard I swear Abdul, this is the last time I fall for your "Dude, come on over and watch my new Burqa Babes Gone Wild in Damascus DVD" lie. I could be at home playing dirty camel herder with my wife, but noooooooooooo - I have to be stuck here with you guys counting ballots. And where the heck is that pizza we ordered anyway?
Posted by: Graeme at October 16, 2005 11:22 AM (wYSxw)
15
Any votes for "no"?
Go fish!
Posted by: Jeff Medcalf at October 16, 2005 12:57 PM (eer2X)
16
Abdullah, go to the door and tell Jimmy Carter thanks, but we can count just fine by ourselves.
Posted by: D. Carter at October 16, 2005 01:48 PM (xT77+)
17
Can you say President Schwarzenegger!?
Posted by: Ayatrollah at October 16, 2005 01:56 PM (497To)
18
"One million, three hundred thousand, four hundred and two, one million three hundred thousand, four hundred and three . . . Rasheed, will you stop singing '99 Bottles of Beer on the Wall'? Let's see, one million, three hundred thousand and . . . Crap! One, two, three . . ."
Posted by: D. Carter at October 16, 2005 02:49 PM (xT77+)
19
Don't miss the fatwa news!:
- Soccer Shariah
http://missmabrouk.blogspot.com/2005/10/shariah-on-soccer-field.html
- Egypt's Fatwa Crisis:
http://missmabrouk.blogspot.com/2005/10/egypts-fatwa-crisis.html
Thanks! More at http://missmabrouk.blogspot.com
take care / ritzy
Posted by: Ritzy Mabrouk at October 16, 2005 03:29 PM (pSHkP)
20
What's
this-- "No" votes from the Netherlands and France??
Posted by: charlotte at October 16, 2005 05:17 PM (ywZa8)
21
Count carefully, my friends, else the American Democrats inspect your dimples and hang your chads...
Posted by: charlotte at October 16, 2005 05:22 PM (ywZa8)
22
Ali, I'll see your fascist Iraq and raise you a democracy.
Posted by: charlotte at October 16, 2005 05:40 PM (ywZa8)
23
Who the hell is Christine Gregoire, and where did all these Washington State Gubernatorial ballots come from?
Posted by: Anty at October 16, 2005 06:46 PM (P/IhD)
24
Monkmojo : This will go down on your
permanent record.
Posted by: Howie at October 16, 2005 09:26 PM (D3+20)
25
They voted on time yeah yeah, They voted on time yeah yeah.
Posted by: Howie at October 16, 2005 09:29 PM (D3+20)
Posted by: Howie at October 16, 2005 09:32 PM (D3+20)
27
"Hey, how goes the tally so far?"
"'YES' is winning and 'NO' is coming in third."
"Third? Who's in second?"
"Pat Buchanan."
"Woo Hoo! Democracy has arrived!"
Posted by: Tuning Spork at October 16, 2005 09:40 PM (Kfkyk)
28
"You imbecile, I said to forge voter registrations, not GOAT HERDER registrations!"
Or...
"See? I told you strip hold'em was more fun without that Sheehan bitch."
Posted by: RomeoDelta at October 17, 2005 01:54 AM (8Aigg)
29
hey good editorial give it a read http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,170-1829047,00.html
Posted by: Graeme at October 17, 2005 04:59 AM (CY03r)
30
I just want to point out that the "Graeme" recommending the Times Editorial and the "Graeme" of comment #14 are not the same person.
Posted by: Graeme at October 17, 2005 06:29 AM (ZBCiB)
31
The accounting firm for American Idol tallies voter results over tea and falafel in a private get-away.
Posted by: charlotte at October 17, 2005 09:37 AM (ywZa8)
32
Faisal, while doing his bit for democracy, secretly wonders and dreads how long it will take before someone notices his shirt matches the drapes.
Posted by: Venom at October 17, 2005 12:02 PM (dbxVM)
33
I like Venom's.
"One alhumdulillah, two alhumdulillah, three alhumdulillah, four. Five alhumdulillah, six alhumdulillah, seven alhumduneo-cons more."
Posted by: charlotte at October 17, 2005 01:34 PM (6krEN)
34
Hey! What are we supposed to do with all these AOL CDs?
Posted by: JustPlainJoe at October 17, 2005 03:06 PM (Xj6+u)
35
"I found the missing Florida votes, quick we gotta call Gore."
"Very Good, Saddam wins the Iraqi Presidency again with 100% of the votes."
Posted by: Rodney Dill at October 17, 2005 07:23 PM (tGTSA)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
130kb generated in CPU 0.0597, elapsed 0.0866 seconds.
39 queries taking 0.0515 seconds, 226 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.