October 26, 2004

Terrorist Group Releases Video of 11 Captured Iraqis

captured.jpgA new video released by the Army of Ansar al-Sunnah shows 11 Iraqi National Guard soldiers being held hostage by the group. The video can be downloaded here. The video shows the eleven men sitting in what appears to be the same courtyard the group has used to murder several other hostages. The video shows each soldier dressed in various Iraqi National Guard uniforms or in 'LSF' shirts and each soldier is asked to state his name for the camera. [Right: image from the video showing the hostages]

While this Boston Globe article claims that 'the authenticity of the posting cannot be confirmed', let me just put that to rest. This is authentic. The saddest part is that these men are dead already. The Army of Ansar al-Sunnah has murdered all of their hostages, including several Iraqi nationals and those who appeared to 'repent' of their collaboration with the US. All of their earlier victims have been civilians. Further, as reported here earlier, the group has deepened it's ties to al Qaeda in the past few weeks. The Army of Ansar al-Sunnah murdered an Iraqi citizen named either Yassar Musil or Seif Adnan Kanaan on Oct. 23rd [information, images, and links to video here]. During the taped beheading of Turkish truck driver Ramadan Elbu on October 15th by the Army of Ansar al-Islam, one of the murderers identified himself as a follower of Zarqawi [information, video, and images here]. On October 11th, another individual claimed to be a member of Zarqawi's Tawhid and Jihad group on a beheading video released by the group--the victims were a Turkish truck driver and his Iraqi translator [information, video, and images here]. The Army of Ansar al Sunnah murdered an Iraqi named Barie Nafi'a Daoud Ibrahim on Oct. 2nd [images, link to video, and information here]. The same group murdered three Iraqis on September 16th (information, links to video, and images here). On August 31st, these terrorists executed 12 hostages from Nepal, one of them by beheading (information, links to video, and images here). On August 11th the group beheaded a man they claimed was a CIA agent (information and images here) and on August 25th the group beheaded a second alleged CIA agent (information and images here).

Posted by: Rusty at 02:58 PM | Comments (11) | Add Comment
Post contains 362 words, total size 3 kb.

1 "deepened its ties to Al Qaeda" you say? And everyone still thinks Iraq has nothing to do with 9/11 and terrorism? What's it gonna take to convince everyone that Bush was justified in sending troops to Iraq b/c Saddam WAS/IS a threat, and would have used those explosives we can't seem to find right now, to make WMD's to use against us???? Zarqawi pledges alliance with Al Qaeda, he trained in the camps of the Al Qaeda, under Osama Bin Laden. And the bleeding heart lib's and war haters are STILL saying Iraq posed no threat?

Posted by: Laura at October 26, 2004 03:14 PM (ptOpl)

2 If this isnt proof that things are getting worst over there. i dont know what else to say.Now they are capturing and killing there own. Now do you really think that the Iraq's really want us over there. come on think about it. The insurgents are getting desperate. kInd of like the republicans with that stupid post about kerry being a puppet for the Vietcong..... I guess in a way we are the same. Just in a different way..

Posted by: Vote4change at October 26, 2004 03:19 PM (xdHNZ)

3 I believe Zarqawi came to Iraq after the war broke out as did the other terrorists fighting the coalition in Iraq. Bush said it himself in the debates that terrorists are flooding over the borders to come to fight. If they are flooding over the borders to fight that means they weren't there in the first place. Show me where Iraq had direct involvement in 9/11. I'm not saying Iraq wasn't a threat but this WMD shit has to stop. They aren't there so build a bridge and get over it. These people are killing each other don't you think if they had such explosives they would use them now?

Posted by: LMAO at October 26, 2004 03:46 PM (p5xDI)

4 Let me just say to LMAO that he is basically right. Of course, basically right doesn't mean all the way right, but it is basically right--there was no operational collaboration between al Qaeda and Iraq. However, having no 'operational' colloboration is not the same as having no collaboration. But, all the same, Saddam and bin Laden were not in bed together. But, as he already knows, that is besides the point. We find ourselves in the position we find ourselves in now. But FYI, Zarqawi was in Iraq before the war, but it was not in an area controlled by Saddam. And the vote 4 change guy has a wierd posting. If the terrrorists are 'desperate' as he claims, then we should be doing exactly what we are doing--since we are the cause of their desperation.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at October 26, 2004 03:58 PM (JQjhA)

5 Rusty, thanks for the info. Goes to show that not every one always has the correct info.

Posted by: LMAO at October 26, 2004 04:03 PM (p5xDI)

6 f this isnt proof that things are getting worst over there. i dont know what else to say. This is what I mean by the left's confusion regarding scale and timing. 1. The capture and murder of 12 Iraqi guardsmen says absolutely nothing about the allegiances of most Iraqis. it certainly isn't an example of a popular uprising, even a small one. It's just more of the same Jihadist barbarity. 2. Although it's clearly not evidence that "things are getting worse," that in itself is not relevant... any more that the fact that the Battle of the Bulge or Iwo Jima were signs that things were "getting worse" during the latter stages of WWII. The issue is whether or not we're destroying the enemy at a faster rate than they can sustain, and there's every evidence that we are. Plus, it's just a really dumb and cowardly thing to say. I believe Zarqawi came to Iraq after the war broke out Well, you believe wrong. We know for a fact that he spent significant time with Ansar Al Islam in northern Iraq, but there's also evidence that he was a "guest" of the Saddam regime in Baghdad prior to the US invasion.

Posted by: Demosophist at October 26, 2004 04:07 PM (OtR16)

7 "Well, you believe wrong" Ya someone has pointed that out already, but thanks for coming out.

Posted by: LMAO at October 26, 2004 04:40 PM (eAnrJ)

8 How can one say there wasn't a link bet. Zarqawi and Al Qaeda? He trained in Afghanistan and went to Iraq. He trained in the very camps that Osama ran! Okay, maybe he and Saddam weren't together on matters, maybe it was a fight for power bet. the two... Iraq was a threat in its own way with Saddam being there. Had we gotten Hitler as fast as we captured Saddam, millions of lives may have been saved. Granted, lots of lives are being lost since this Iraq invasion, but who's to say MORE wouldn't be lost, had Saddam remained in Iraq and in power? He was murdering by the thousand's before we even got there!

Posted by: Laura at October 26, 2004 04:45 PM (ptOpl)

9 Looking at that photo again of the captured Iraqi soldiers, is it me, or does the one, second from the left look like a woman?? I haven't seen Zarqawi's group behead a woman..yet..Hussan would be the first I'd know about, when and if that happened...which looks inevitable, sadly.

Posted by: Laura at October 27, 2004 07:57 PM (ptOpl)

10 Yep, all dead. I just heard on the radio that a video was released, showing one soldier beheaded and the others being shot to death. Damn.

Posted by: Laura at October 28, 2004 09:25 AM (ptOpl)

11 Despite my own reservations of conflict in the begining, it appears there is a vipers nest of fractional terrorists forming and need to be snuffed out at source.

Posted by: Les.Knowles at January 03, 2005 08:56 PM (uaOj7)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
25kb generated in CPU 0.0516, elapsed 0.1722 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.162 seconds, 260 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.