Actual headline over at the LA Times. Amazing.

Bloggers with more to say than me: Charles Johsnon: The LA Times has exactly reversed the truth, in best Orwellian fashion.

Commissar: ...even Charlie Rangel the author of the bill, votes against it. Got it? Rangel introduces a bill that is so bad that even he votes against it. He undeniably introduced it to make a political point, but should the House leadership force the thing to a vote, well ... that is a "cheap political ploy."

Digger (crossposted): So why, I ask did Charlie Rangle not vote for his own bill that he introduced into the house? Maybe because he was full of crap?

California Yankee: I'm glad that the Dems' Despicable Draft Deception has been defeated. Young people of draft age and their parents can rest easier.

Ubique Patriam Reminisci: (funniest take) Besides, do you know how many kittens died while Rangel was originally pushing this needless piece of zebu refuse legislation? ONE PER MINUTE! I mean, come on New York! Why isnÂ’t your guy actually tackling the issues? RANGEL LIED, KITTENS DIED!

Chad (here and here): Despite numerous attempts by the Democrats to paint the issue of the military drafy upon Republicans, the only two who voted for the draft were Jack Murtha, D-PA and Pete Stark, D-CA. Of course this bill was introduced by Charles Rangel, D-NY and Fritz Hollings, D-TN

Cranky Neocon: Hopefully, this well backfire on the Dems. Where is Karl Rove when you need him? What's that? He just ducked into a phone booth. We're all saved!

Say Anything: The bias in this article is absolutely amazing.

MuD and PhuD: Will everyone now drop all this draft talk?

Posted by: Rusty at 12:30 PM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 303 words, total size 3 kb.