November 23, 2004
Phallic Conspiracy: USC vs. USC
Quinton and I have been going back and forth in e-mail for months over who the
real USC is. As a Trojan alumni I resent any use of the term USC applied to the Gamecocks! Jeff now informs me that Mike McGee left the Trojans for the Gamecocks and has been Athletic Director both places. Is Mike McGee gay? No! What could be gay about a guy who is really into phallic symbols? Anyway, for all the latest on the Gamecock scandals check
out Quinton.
PS-Will Collier gets in on the joke.
Posted by: Rusty at
08:20 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 102 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I put up with 7000 other UA's, so I think you can handle one other USC.
Posted by: Joe R. the Unabrewer at November 23, 2004 09:31 AM (xzIhx)
2
Hey at least the University of Southern California has a class name for the womens' teams: the WOMEN OF TROY! Sounds a hell of a lot better than the LADY TROJANS doesn't it!
Posted by: Macker at November 23, 2004 10:06 AM (9F0Tf)
3
I'm sure it's an urban legend but, supposedly, USC did play USC in football years ago. The most popular poster around in Columbia was one that said "Your Trojans can't cover our Cocks!"
Posted by: JFH at November 23, 2004 10:24 AM (z4es9)
4
As a Clemson alum, I find it amusing that South Carolina fans consider themselves "USC" or "Carolina" when in reality much of the country thinks USC is Southern Cal and Carolina is NORTH Carolina.
Posted by: Jeremy at November 23, 2004 11:28 AM (/U19w)
5
On a slightly different, but relevent note...
Back in the day, a decade and a half ago, when I was a wee lad in high school I had a friend who was a cheerleader at University High in Irvine, CA. Their mascot also being the Trojans. And yes...one of their cheers was: Come on, Trojans. Come on!
Posted by: Kin at November 24, 2004 09:20 AM (ZQldT)
6
I find it funny that Clemson has the same mascot, fight song, and stadium nickname as the LSU tigers
Posted by: USC fan at April 27, 2005 07:25 PM (brQB0)
Posted by: Free Dish Network Installers at June 27, 2005 10:14 PM (X7KLM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 20, 2004
Censorship on College Campus
My anger at this guy showing Fahrenheit 9/11 to his class is only eclipsed by my anger at his suspension by the powers that be. College campuses are supposed to be filled with ideas--even stupid ideas--not subject to review by those in administration. Its called academic freedom.
Jeff Quinton has more.
Posted by: Rusty at
04:20 PM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.
1
yeah, that pencil-necked dingleshit was in the Charlotte Shit Rag the other day.
See PC 101 I sent you
Posted by: Mr. K at November 20, 2004 04:25 PM (gX1t1)
Posted by: Rusty at November 20, 2004 04:41 PM (JQjhA)
3
I think he should be bitch slapped. I agree with academic freedom and showing students thought provoking subject matter. But he was clearly doing his little grass roots effort to get out those youg voters.
I think the little turd should be fired.
Here is what I sent you:
http://academicbias.com/bw101.html
Posted by: Mr. K at November 20, 2004 05:04 PM (xxqyx)
4
Academic freedom: What if he was showing films of people torturing little puppy dogs or worse? Academic freedom doesn't mean anything goes.
I would have been less concerned if the biased dingbat would have shown it after the election. Did he? Probably not. Nay Rusty, another liberal at all costs got caught. That should be the end of it.
Posted by: greeyrooster at November 20, 2004 05:32 PM (ydtpC)
5
Rusty,
The documentarian over at Brain-Terminal made a documentary about something similar that I thought you might like. It's called: "
Brainwashing 101". It's being hosted by
Academicbias.com.
Since you're a teacher I thought you'd like to get the skinny on this.
Posted by: Jeremy at November 20, 2004 05:49 PM (farnf)
Posted by: Jeremy at November 20, 2004 05:51 PM (farnf)
7
People need to realise that "Freedom of speech" does not mean that everyone should bend over backwards to provide you with a stage from which to deliver that speech.
This teacher was clearly abusing his position to impose his own views upon the class.
He asked for permission to send out flyers promoting the showing of the film and permission was denied by the schools authorities.
Maybe it should have been made clearer that it wasn't just the posters they wouldn't allow.
I always thought schools ahd a curriculum and certain books, videos and other teaching materials were agreed upon prior to the commencement of the school year?
If I was a teacher, I would recommend all my students read Atlas Shrugged IN THEIR OWN TIME but I wouldn't make them read it before they went home that night.
Posted by: Red Devil at November 21, 2004 05:49 PM (+vlk+)
8
not unless they can read real damn fast.
Posted by: Mr. K at November 21, 2004 06:22 PM (lDgOv)
9
Interesting. So the censorship you were calling for a few months ago does not extend to the classroom. I guess that's a good thing. A bit bewildering, but good.
By the way I think it is kind of silly to suggest that Fahrenheit 9/11 wouldn't be a productive use of class time. I'm starting to think you've been swallowed whole by your conservative ideology and no longer give even the slightest thought that perhaps your worldview might be dead wrong.
Posted by: Professor Peter Von Nostrand at November 21, 2004 09:54 PM (ESJWt)
10
By the way, it is quite humorous to read all of these liberal bashing comments after reading Thomas Frank's great new book "What's the Matter with Kansas." All this pissing and moaning. And no no coherent end.
Posted by: Professor Peter Von Nostrand at November 21, 2004 09:56 PM (ESJWt)
11
no objections to showing F911 anytime, as long as Stolen Valor or Farenhype 911 get equal time.
teachers and professors frequently abuse the sacred trust that has been given them, and it works on both ends of the political ideology spectrum.
teach them to think, and question. not what to think, and what to question.
Posted by: Mr. K at November 22, 2004 06:50 AM (K4Scw)
12
"teachers and professors frequently abuse the sacred trust that has been given them"
Rusty, does this apply to you?
Posted by: Venom at November 22, 2004 08:50 AM (dbxVM)
13
I would gladly show clips of Fahrenhype 9/11 (or the whole thing if time permitted), even though it is a vastly inferior product (as is virtually everything Ann Coulter touches).
One thing I object to is that any of you know what is going on in anybody else's classroom. Furthermore, I do not think I have
ever criticised anything a conservative has presented to students, perhaps because we liberals are not so up tight about that sort of thing, and/or perhaps because I realize that all of our educations benefit from a good mix of all perspectives (I impersonated a fundamentalist christian and took questions from my students just to keep things fair the other day).
I don't begrudge Rusty for his approach in the classroom, but he and his ilk
do begrudge what liberal professors teach. That's lame, especially since he hardly has a monopoly on any truth worth mentioning.
Lastly, anyone who makes available these disgusting beheadings - either out of principle or to get blog ratings - has very little credibility left to tell anyone what to show any audience.
Posted by: Professor Peter Von Nostrand at November 22, 2004 02:45 PM (ESJWt)
14
Ok. Maybe Team America: World Police and F9-11 would be better in a compare these films lesson.
No, the liberal mindset controls the colleges and universities. Always has. Took me twenty years to figure out they tried to brainwash me. Yes. Its true. I used to call him reckless Ron Reagan, the war monger. My econ professor railed on about how deficit spending would crowd out private investment. the chair of the department read aloud from A Radical History of the United States, suggesting that the signers of the declaration of independence were all motivated by greed.
But when the USSR collapsed, I began to see the light. Then, entering into the world of business, I really saw it.
No, Doc, you should show those kids the beheading videos. They will get to watch that Marine shoot that militant over and over. They will hear the PC crowd tell them Islam is the religion of peace, it is all about oil, and on and on, ad nauseum.
The after they have watched the videos, get them to read the quran, and the hadiths.Get them to read about the seige of Vienna. Or the Greek war for independence. Or about the slaughter of the zoroasters.
When I did, it just made me sick.
Posted by: Mr. K at November 22, 2004 03:12 PM (bhEHj)
15
I see the creep PETER VON NOSTRIL is back. The 2 people on his blog must be sleeping.
Posted by: greyrooster at November 22, 2004 06:03 PM (BFaxF)
16
I'd second that comment up there.
By all means watch Fahrenheit 911... but then read The Koran.
Actually, just read The Koran.
You don't need to read it all. By about... ooo... ten pages in, you will see how "peaceful" this religion really is.
Posted by: Red Devil at November 22, 2004 06:13 PM (+vlk+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 18, 2004
Which Light Saber Color is Rusty?
I'm giving a test right now to my night class. So what do I do? Surf the blogosphere, of course! Via the
Llamabutchers (who say they got it from
Big Stupid Tommy, who got it from
Missives Anonymous, who got it from
Allison, who got it from
Tyler Durden, etc....[somewhere in here there is a philosophy paper to be written, I'm thinking infinite regressions.....])
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
06:50 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 140 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Hey I can't get to this quiz!
Posted by: Macker at November 21, 2004 01:06 AM (pwS0P)
2
If you are at school the school blocked them...im still trying to find the override codes (*_*)/
Posted by: Jen-gi at June 07, 2005 07:06 AM (Qaafn)
3
this quiz is stupid because the color you pick is the color light saber you get
Posted by: jedi master at June 13, 2005 05:42 PM (eQLl1)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 11, 2004
Silence of the Lambs: Bigger, Longer, Uncut
Posted by: Rusty at
05:37 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 14 words, total size 1 kb.
1
This is just wrong...yet I am listening.
Posted by: Maureen at November 11, 2004 05:55 PM (ny5O/)
2
Totally wrong. Disgustingly wrong. Sick and wrong. I want more.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at November 11, 2004 08:58 PM (JQjhA)
3
Rusty,
What is this insanity? It wrong on so many levels!
Same response as Maureen tho.
Posted by: Gordon at November 11, 2004 09:05 PM (dEFhD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 09, 2004
Test Blogging
I'm giving a test right now. Shhhhh. Be very quiet.
Seriously, they should never have put this computer in this classroom. With me it's blogging, but who knows what other profs are doing on this thing? Let's check the history cache and find out, shall we?
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
11:52 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 173 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Downloding porn? Checking stock quotes? Porn-Quotes?
Posted by: Bill Dautrive at November 09, 2004 12:09 PM (G95Uf)
2
By the way, how do YOU give a test with your pants around your ankles?
Posted by: Bill Dautrive at November 09, 2004 12:11 PM (G95Uf)
3
Is that, like, a haiku or something?
Posted by: Rusty at November 09, 2004 01:45 PM (JQjhA)
4
He's dead...he's alive....he's dead....he's alive....I wish they would just pull the plug....I'm tired of hearing about it already!
Posted by: Chad at November 09, 2004 01:59 PM (la8jb)
Posted by: Rusty at November 09, 2004 02:14 PM (JQjhA)
6
Nothing better than studying for a urine test.
Posted by: Dick at November 09, 2004 04:11 PM (hu9UN)
7
A number of computers on campus were stolen on the weekend. All those history caches/downloaded files were the first things that came to mind.
Posted by: Flea at November 09, 2004 07:23 PM (/JBxu)
8
oooooooo I am Tellin!!!..... hahaha
Posted by: Andrea at November 10, 2004 11:37 AM (+7VNs)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The New York Slimes
by Demosophist
Back in 1996 I got a phone solicitation from the New York Times and on the spur of the moment decided it'd be a good idea to subscribe. After about three weeks I noticed that I hadn't seen a paper, and wandered down to the front desk to see if someone might be leaving it in my box. At the time I lived in a high rise just inside the beltway. Well, it turned out that rather than deliver the paper to me, or even leave it for me at the desk, the Times delivery service was just driving up to the front of the building and dumping papers intended for the residents unceremoniously onto the sidewalk.
more...
Posted by: Demosophist at
02:25 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 260 words, total size 2 kb.
1
You must be kidding. They're one of the largest newspaper organizations in the world. Of course they have glitches from time-to-time. Typical crude stereotyping from you guys. See the world like you want to see it.
Posted by: give it up at November 09, 2004 03:53 AM (ASZ8c)
2
And do you really have to be so crude about it? Can't you just criticize the paper in a civilized way without calling them "The New York Slimes"? That's pathetic.
This is why our country is going to hell. Elevate the dialog, beeotches.
Posted by: give it up at November 09, 2004 03:56 AM (ASZ8c)
3
Hey give it up! Fitting name, why don't you practice your name? You no like, you come here.
Freedom of speech so here's one for you:
FUCK OFF!
Posted by: Vinnyboy at November 09, 2004 07:10 AM (ptOpl)
4
"Elevate the dialog, beeotches"
That comment popped the irony fuse on my computer...
Posted by: Sharp as a Marble at November 09, 2004 12:19 PM (VxPRK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 08, 2004
American Exceptionalism
posted by Demosophist
Victor Davis Hanson's latest:
The Democrats now lament that America would prefer to be "wrong" with George Bush than "right" with them. They will no doubt adduce a number of other paradoxes, excuses, and sorrows. But the fact is that the Left was united, well-funded, and ran the most vitriolic campaign in the Democratic party's history — and still lost, taking all branches of power with it. The New York Times and the major networks have undone their legacy of a half-century, and in the desire for cheap partisan advantage have ruined the reputations of anchormen, the very notion of fair front-page reporting, and, indeed, the useful concept itself of an exit poll. 60 Minutes, Nightline, ABC News — these are now seen by millions as mere highbrow versions of Fahrenheit 9/11.
(Cross-posted by Demosophist to Demosophia and Anticipatory Retaliation)
Posted by: Demosophist at
11:28 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 147 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Folks who pay attention and can think have known the "Mainstream" media has had an anti American bias for at least 50 years. The NYT has been anti American since the 1920s check out their pro Communist pack of lies that won a Nobel 70 years ago. Read their WW2 papers, you will notice a # that except for names and places could have been written in 03 or today. Rathergat just made the hate America agenda of the "mainstream" media obvious to anyone with an IQ above room temp.
Posted by: Rod Stanton at November 09, 2004 04:28 AM (a2hGw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Myth of The Supreme Court as Agent of Desegregation
It's not often that I get to respond directly to another blogger's post. But I just wanted to
bitch slap some sense into the Smallholder (since the Maximum Leader seems to have so much restraint these days). His post reminds me of the old Maxim. No, not
an old maxim, an
old issue of Maxim which I am reminded of every time I make it over to his site. Now where was I? Oh, the notion that it was the courts that desegregated our nation. I can't blame the Smallholder for holding this clearly erroneous view of history. No, wait, sure I can. I blame the Smallholder for holding this clearly erroneous view of history. But I also blame our educational elite for promoting the myth of the court.
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
03:15 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 484 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Thanks. It was a long day today so I hadn't had a chance to read/respond yet. I did a little redirect, but not a bitch slapping to be sure.
Posted by: The Maximum Leader at November 08, 2004 07:56 PM (zHoql)
2
Well said, Rusty.
You are entirely correct; LBJ does not get the credit he deserves for pushing through Civil Rights legislation. I did not mean to imply that court action was the only source of movement against desegregation; I'll clarify in another post. My point was that court action put desegregation on the political agenda. Lacking Brown v. Board or another desegregation ruling, the civil rights movement would have had a much harder time getting off the ground.
Thanks for calling my attention to the need to clarify.
Love the blog.
Posted by: Smallholder at November 09, 2004 07:03 AM (EKkB8)
3
http://www.nakedvillainy.com/2004/11/thank-you-sir-may-i-have-another.html
Posted by: Smallholder at November 09, 2004 09:34 AM (EKkB8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 02, 2004
New Prediction: Electoral Vote Tie!!
Ok, call it a political-scientist's wet dream, but I just calls it likes I sees it.
The Electoral Vote will be a tie!! Something that has not happened since the election of 1800, and in that election the tie was a mistake that resulted from a Constitutional flaw. This could get interesting....am I the only one out there who now thinks this has gone from a
possible scenario to a
likely scenario?
UPDATE: In case of a tie, the decision goes to the House of Representatives. The interesting catch is that each state gets a single vote in choosing the President in this case. The Republicans have a 12 seat majority in the House, but that would not automatically translate into a victory for Bush. Why? Again, each state gets one vote. Here's a question for my readers, which I don't know the answer to: How many state delegations to the US House of Representatives have more Republicans than Democrats? The Constitution does not clarify how the state delegations would decide which person to vote for, but presumably each delegation would meet by themselves and vote amongst themselves.
The Senate would then get to choose the VP, and since the Republicans have an advantage, you have a Cheney victory.
Steve over at Poli-blog makes some good observations in his last Toast-o-Meter. Looking around at the predictions, I'd say I'm the only one that really thinks the 269-269 scenario is likely. This roundup of roundups has no one else predicting it this way.
Megapundit will be upudating their Unofficial Poll Results all day (via Discarded Lies)
Shout out to Bill for dropping the Sith Lord Cheney reference. Vote or Lord Vader will crush your windpipe!! And from Bill's post a link to one of Dean's which shows the Dark-Side must be powerful in the military.
Note to Dean: I get uncomfortable with all this talk of the 'back door' on the same day I do a Wonkette post. Anyway, even with so many military votes going Bush, I still think Florida goes Kerry and we end up with the 269-269 scenario.
Note from Demosophist: One of the W. Virginia electors has said that he won't vote for Bush under any conditions. He's a maverick. Have you figured that into your predicition?
No, hadn't thought of that. But I also hadn't factored in the fact that one of Maine's electors might go Bush (Maine splits their electors by House District). So, it's a wash!
Ok, Pixy Misa, the god of the munuvians, drops this in the comments: There are 30 Republican-majority state delegations in the House, 16 Democrat, and 4 deadlocked. So an Electoral College tie is a Republican win.
Ouch, are the early numbers really saying "Please Rusty, don't hurt em?" I mean, is this looking like vindication or what?
Linked with today's Jimmy beltway fest.
Posted by: Rusty at
02:54 PM
| Comments (22)
| Add Comment
Post contains 485 words, total size 4 kb.
1
A tie is supposed to go to the incumbent, yes? Well, let's be realistic - it'll go to the lawyers. May the best firm win!
Posted by: Ricky V at November 02, 2004 02:58 PM (AHaCg)
2
That would make a Bush-Edwards result possible, wouldn't it, sir? Thank you.
Posted by: rev rick at November 02, 2004 02:59 PM (TG49H)
3
Possible, yes, but not likely. There are 51 Republicans in the Senate.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at November 02, 2004 03:00 PM (JQjhA)
4
I thought the VP comes in to break the tie.
Posted by: Jane at November 02, 2004 03:02 PM (6krEN)
5
Jane, nope. The VP is chosen by the Senate, the Pres by the House.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at November 02, 2004 03:10 PM (JQjhA)
6
This would make a great reality TV show for FOX! I'm seeing Johny Cochrane as the host, unless Kerry has him heading the team. My Fat Obnoxious President, perhaps? Hmmm... they aren't really fat though.
Posted by: LMAO at November 02, 2004 03:21 PM (p5xDI)
7
I wish we could resurrect 'That's My Bush' from Comedy Central.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at November 02, 2004 03:26 PM (JQjhA)
8
Is that scenario possible => President/Vice from differnet parties???
Posted by: Roopesh at November 02, 2004 03:31 PM (q9wBH)
9
Yes it is, but not likely. It's all right there in the 12th amendment.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at November 02, 2004 03:44 PM (JQjhA)
10
That's My Bush was f'n hilarious!!! Have you seen the pilot for American Dad? It's done by the Family Guy ppl. You should check that out.
Posted by: LMAO at November 02, 2004 03:51 PM (p5xDI)
11
Any elections going on in any foreign countries I could stick my nose in?
Posted by: greyrooster at November 02, 2004 03:53 PM (CBNGy)
12
Thanks for the trackback, Rusty :-)
A tie? Oy. I hadn't even considered a tie when I started chewing my fingernails.
Posted by: zorkmidden at November 02, 2004 03:53 PM (q9kwd)
13
American Dad pilot
http://www.muchosucko.com/video-americandadpilot.html
Hope you think its as funny as i did. If you haven't seen it already.
Posted by: LMAO at November 02, 2004 03:54 PM (p5xDI)
14
LMAO--haven't seen that one. Zorkmidden, no problemo. Greyrooster, yeah, I hear that the Brits may be calling new elections. Maybe we can start a letter writing campaign?
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at November 02, 2004 03:56 PM (JQjhA)
15
Rusty:
I've a question about the tie scenario. One of the W. Virginia electors has said that he won't vote for Bush under any conditions. He's a maverick. Have you figured that into your predicition? Do you think he'll be replaced, or that someone will change his mind?
Posted by: Demosophist at November 02, 2004 03:59 PM (OtR16)
16
No, I hadn't factored that in. Interesting. But I also didn't figure in that one of Maine's electors might go Bush.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at November 02, 2004 04:07 PM (JQjhA)
17
There are 30 Republican-majority state delegations in the House, 16 Democrat, and 4 deadlocked. So an Electoral College tie is a Republican win.
Now, if there was a tie in the House as well,
then the VP would be called in to break the tie. Wouldn't that get the Left's knickers in a knot? Won't happen, though.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at November 02, 2004 04:42 PM (+S1Ft)
18
Just checking to see if this remembers me...
Posted by: Pixy Misa at November 02, 2004 04:44 PM (+S1Ft)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at November 02, 2004 04:45 PM (+S1Ft)
20
Rusty, there's something wrong specifically with how you have your comments set up, above and beyond the MuNu problem. I'll take a look later today.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at November 02, 2004 04:46 PM (+S1Ft)
21
Exit polls are showing that fewer than 10% of the votes came from young voters, therby squashing any hopes that they would be the ones to sway the election toward a Kerry win.
There's still hope!!
Posted by: Laura at November 02, 2004 07:01 PM (ptOpl)
22
Anyone realize that the vote in Penn. was much closer than the vote in Ohio. Say what!!! We need a recount. We've been cheated.
Posted by: greyrooster at November 08, 2004 10:35 AM (aq8Ok)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Poll Watching: Voter Intimidation?
by Demosophist
Well, I've voted. It's now up to history. But the circumstances of my experience led me to pontificate a bit on the accusations of voter intimidation that have been eminating from the mainstream Democratic activists. (I posted a comment about this on my home blog, but decided to turn the comment into a longer post because the topic seems to have acquired gravitas that I would not have expected a week ago.)
I don't know where the idea came from that poll watching was invented by Republicans to intimidate Democrats, but the accusation manifests a lot more heat than light. I worked for a number of years as a Democratic Party campaign organizer, and it was always pretty standard practice to do a stint as a poll watcher on election day. As soon as you finished a few tedious hours at the polling place, you went to the "after" party and waited with your fellow activists for the returns to come in. The idea was simply to challenge voters whose bonafides looked suspicious (wrong address, name change, etc.) and the government poll worker would then check the name, or ask for further identification. Normally a check was done on the spot, but nowadays the person who is challenged just fills out a provisional ballot and, if necessary, the check is done later. A very good idea.
more...
Posted by: Demosophist at
01:56 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 717 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Yes, we're a nation of pussies--and I'm afraid the F.A.G.s are in charge.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at November 02, 2004 02:00 PM (JQjhA)
2
What do you all think of those voting booths that were supposedly "rigged" to have contained votes in them already? I hear the Bush campaign is gonna sue em!!!!
Doesn't sound like Kerry's people are that confident, does it?
;-)
Posted by: Laura at November 02, 2004 02:27 PM (ptOpl)
3
If Kerry does win election through fraud, I don't expect the repubs to put up much of a fight.
And if Kerry really lives in a world where he can thinks he can 'heal' the divide in this country, he is truly delusional.
Go and read this posted over at http://beldar.blogs.com/beldarblog/2004/10/beldar_asks_his.html#c25068
"For John Kerry to fulfill your vision for his presidency — for him to run a "smarter, more effective" fight against the terrorists — he's not only going to have to fade the heat from the Howard Dean wing of the Democratic Party, he's going to have to line up and make effective use of Republican allies."
You really need to go and read this whole thing. The man is in real deep doo doo if he wins. He's going to be like the dog who rabidly chases the car biting AT the tires, what's he gonna do when he finally catches that rotating monster?
If it weren't for the fact that we're at war, it might be some fun to watch the headless chickens who'll be running the white house for the next four years.
Posted by: mshyde at November 02, 2004 03:38 PM (dVnlf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
*Shocking* Results of A Straw Poll of the Profs. in my Dept.
I asked every single full-time faculty member of my department who they voted for. Here are the
shocking results.
Kerry=9
Bush=2
No vote or declined to state=2
Among the nine Kerry voters, seven say they would have preferred to vote for Ralph Nader. Of the two Bush supporters, one is an untenured political-scientist (wink-wink) and the other is a Full Professor of History with a specialty in military history. One Assistant Professor of Criminal Justice did not vote on prinicple, he is a Libertarian--although I openly speculated to him that he was a convicted felon. One Full Professor of History declined the invitation to state who he had voted for.
Posted by: Rusty at
12:29 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 134 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Sharp as a Marble at November 02, 2004 12:37 PM (VxPRK)
2
I won't say what college i'm attending as a student but I talked to a staff member of the college and he says that most of the staff wants kerry in "because they'll increase funding to the colleges." well, this person is also not going to wait to see if the college renews its contract with him as this person is now looking elsewhere for a job. Funny thing is colleges and universities are being run like city, state and federal governments. They hike the prices on everyone for the services while offering less and less all the while the higher ups in the administration raise their own bloated saleries. Gee, sounds so fimilar.
Posted by: Andre at November 02, 2004 12:39 PM (hD5mx)
3
Well, I'm not surprised considering that in my "academic ivory tower" I'm either the only one who voted for the President or one of 2 out of maybe 30 people.
But that increased funding argument doesn't hold water. Bush actually doubled NIH funding and clarified some aspects of funding policy. Dems don't want to remember that.....
Posted by: caltechgirl at November 02, 2004 12:59 PM (ce0nc)
4
Grasping at straws now, eh??
Posted by: Laura at November 02, 2004 01:28 PM (ptOpl)
5
What's shocking about the results? What the general public thinks about much of the academic community was much discussed right here less than a week ago.
Posted by: greyrooster at November 02, 2004 04:24 PM (CBNGy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 01, 2004
Who Will Vote?
by Demosophist
A great deal has been made of the Democrats' GOTV (get out the vote) program. I was a Democratic organizer and activist for years, and I'm pretty familiar with some of the rigmarole. My thesis is that Kerry's ambiguity is pretty much a wash with Democrats, so their motivation to vote for the candidate is no stronger than in any other year, and probably weaker. In fact, the more hawkish he's compelled to be, in order to match Bush, the less attractive he appears to the Deaniacs. Their motivation comes almost exclusively from their aversion to George Bush.
more...
Posted by: Demosophist at
07:50 PM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
Post contains 469 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Osama bin Laden lives. He has threatened terrorist attacks on any Red State. Will you make peace with this killer? Your vote makes this decision.
Half of this nation supports our President. Yet, half wish "For Peace in our time." A noble ambition but it did not work for Neville Chamberlain it will not work today. Peace is earned with sacrifice. You cannot negotiate with Osama bin Laden. He must die or be captured.
Give in to Osama bin Laden and some day he may tell you when to rise each day, when to pray, and what you will think. Have the terroristsÂ’ insurgents that kill our soldiers in Iraq threatened our nation on our soil? No, they do not have the men, the material, the strategy, or the funding.
Osama bin Laden evaded our military not because of out sourcing but because he is a superior opponent with the funding and resources to evade the most sophisticated technological fighting force in history. Hitler and Saddam Hussein abused drugs and alcohol. Both were megalomaniacs with psychotic delusions. It took five years to defeat Hitler and over a year to find Saddam. Osama bin Laden does not have these vices and he is not insane. He is just a killer.
This is a World War. It is not Vietnam. We must finish the liberation and restoration of Iraq. Our Military Forces want President Bush to see this through to the end. This is their choice. Will you deny them? Those that have given their life deserve this hard fought peace. And yet what is your reply? Are you on the front line? Your vote must reflect our nations support of winning this War. We cannot and must not change our Commander in Chief.
We should respect the wishes of those that are on the front line. Do the right thing finish and this War. Let those who are fighting and dying have their say. Your vote is your voice.
Posted by: Volunteer State at November 01, 2004 10:47 PM (Z7wSB)
Posted by: greyrooster at November 02, 2004 05:09 AM (CBNGy)
3
Incredibly well spoken, Volunteer State.
Rusty, I think it all boils down to the youth. If they come out, Bush is done. If not....
Posted by: Dick at November 02, 2004 06:44 AM (hu9UN)
Posted by: Jane at November 02, 2004 07:19 AM (6krEN)
5
Dick:
Why is it not obvious that this post was written by Demosophiast, and not Rusty? I mean, besides noting the fact in two places I even reference and link a post by Rusty and call him "Rusty," so it ought to be obvious that the post wasn't written by the good Doctor. You're scarin' me, man.
As for the youth, where'd you hear that the Democrats have the youth vote sewed up. Polls done by Newsweek, etc., with decent numbers of respondents show the two parties drawing about evenly from 18 to 25 year olds, and some show Republicans leading. John Stewart is Cool, but
Team America is super-cool. I think the Dems have been counting on their draft intimidation factor to scare younger voters into voting for Kerry, but their assumption of youthful ignorance may well backfire. Kids don't like to be lied to. So far the only measure to reinstitute the draft was introduced by Charles Rangel, a Democrat.
Posted by: Demosophist at November 02, 2004 07:26 AM (OtR16)
6
Okay, I'll fess up. I didn't pay attention to who wrote the post. I'm still used to Rusty writing here exclusively. My bad.
As far as the youth, I've seen the polls you've quoted but, the grumpy old man in me is still worried about em.
I am old enough to remember the sixties and seventies and this has the same feel but with a lot more coordination.
We'll see this evening.
Posted by: Dick at November 02, 2004 08:07 AM (hu9UN)
7
Dick:
No problem. It's sort of new for BRD and I as well, but seems to be working out nicely. About the youth vote, the Dems seem to be counting on it, and perhaps they're right. I just found out that my car is dead, so I'll have to walk to my polling place. Wasn't counting on that, but what the heck.
Posted by: Demosophist at November 02, 2004 08:37 AM (OtR16)
8
I'm worried about the "young vote" as well. We need to support the troops and vote Bush back in...why the hell would we want to change leaders in the midst of a war? Yeah, I know, the Demo's will tell you we NEED a change, that Bush has screwed up, blah, blah but the majority of people usually don't vote in someone new in the middle of a war.
Yet, those young uns....I'm ascared!!!!
Posted by: Laura at November 02, 2004 09:09 AM (ptOpl)
9
What? How does voting (very reluctantly) for Kerry equate with "making peace" with Osama? Because he said so? Who makes decisions for you, yourself or someone else? Look, one can vote for someone other than Bush and still be determined to give Osama what he so deserves. George Bush's lies got my friend's son killed in Iraq. I won't soon forget that, nor will his family.
If Bush stayed the course on Osama and Afghanistan, there would not be anywhere near the anger level that there is across the USA, and his reelection would be a no brainer.
Posted by: Geoff at November 02, 2004 11:03 AM (ywZa8)
10
Geoff it is NOT Bush's fault! The men went over there WILLINGLY, VOLUNTARILY, not that they deserve it, by any means.
Then if you agree with staying in Afghanistan, how do you explain the kidnappings that are going on there?????
Same shit, different country. I say nuke em all.
End of story, end of war.
Posted by: Laura at November 02, 2004 11:10 AM (ptOpl)
11
"George Bush's lies got my friend's son killed in Iraq"
Don't even start with this crap!
When that kid raised his right hand and took the oath as an adult of the United States, he knew what could happen the same as I did and millions of others did.
You can shove that statement up your ass. Period end.
Posted by: Dick at November 02, 2004 11:29 AM (hu9UN)
12
He knew what could happen? He knew a bunch of lies spewing out of the mouth of the most powerful man on earth would be the catalist for a war? Bullshit. It is you who can shove it.
Posted by: Geoff at November 02, 2004 04:13 PM (ywZa8)
13
PS to Laura: Nuke them all! The older I get the more I agree. But if we wait long enough, I think India and pakistan will enable just this to happen, sooner or later.
Posted by: Geoff at November 02, 2004 04:19 PM (ywZa8)
14
Geoff, will you be moving out of the country today? If so, I'll help you and your seeing eye dog pack.
Posted by: Dick at November 03, 2004 12:20 PM (hu9UN)
15
GEOFF: You defame the memory of a brave young man. Knock it off.
Billy Metzler of Nickelson, Mississippi is coming home this week. He is now 100% disabled. Billy was my sons best friend in highschool. Billy joined the Army after highschool. He was stationed in Germany with his wife and two kids. Billy was sent to Iraq.
He has been in the hospital for 6 months. Had reconstructive surgery on his hips, arms and legs. My son says he has never complained and wants dearly to stay in the Army but cannot due to his physical condition. Billy was manning a roadblock when a truck full of armed terrorists tried to shoot their way thru. He stood his ground. The truck ran over him. He told my son he got three of them before the truck got him. The truck did not get thru. That is the most important thing to him. The truck did not get thru.
Billy doesn't blame Bush. Billy was doing the job he hired on to do. He did his job for his country with honor. America will now care for Billy as he cared for us.
Sorry about your neighbors son but you have no right to bring our brave young men into your politcal agenda. I don't feel sorry for Billy. I'm proud of him.
If you want to talk to him I will give you his grandma's number. That's were he will be staying. Don't cry for people who don't want your tears. Honor him with your support. All Billy wants is to win.
Posted by: greyrooster at November 03, 2004 02:02 PM (CBNGy)
16
Greyrooster:
Thanks. That was well, and not easily, said. My uncle, Reg Clizbe, was the topic of a chapter in Ernie Pyle's
Brave Men. He survived, to become part of the Air Force General Staff, and had two fine sons and a beautiful daughter (my "hottest" cousin). One of his sons won an Emmy before he died in 1998. The father, ironically, outlived the son.
Reg died last year, at the age of 90-something, right in the midst of the US invasion of Iraq. I imagine, though I can't prove it, that he died fulfilled. He named his second son after his fallen brother, Garth. I don't know Garth at all, but imagine that he's a fine man.
It literally amazes me when Democrats complain that the casualty rate in Iraq is "unacceptable." Certainly any rate is worse than zero, but casualty rates in most US wars have been above 30% and combat deaths in the range of 15% to 20%. Nearly one out of five die. This is the price that has been paid to put us where we are, and that the wishful thinkers would sooner squander, than pay a price one hundredth of the original.
When the terrorists slyly smile and nod to one another, it's these complainers that they (wrongly) take to be Americans...
Fools.
Posted by: Demosophist at November 03, 2004 07:45 PM (OtR16)
17
The libs' argument is that 100,000 + innocent civilians have been killed needlessly for an war that was started illegally, when Bush "illegally invaded" Iraq. They say Iraq was not a direct threat, no WMD were found, Saddam "may" have been a threat to us later, but we don't have proof he would have, and so on.
I am soooo damned tired of this! I don't really think those 100 thous. were casualties as a result of the US soldiers, many of them are suicide bombings and car bombings, and maybe even some were the result of Saddams' doings. I really doubt the numbers are that high.
Saddam was torturing the Iraqi's way before we got there, so why is everyone saying the violence started after we got there? And I do believe Zarqawi always was a part of Al Qaeda. He trained in Afgahnistan under Osama's terrorist camps, and moved to Iraq when we got there (who knows? maybe he was already there).
No one can prove to me that Saddam wouldn't have used WMD against us or that Zarqawi wasn't linked to Al Qaeda before 9/11. I believe it's all related.
Yet, the libs will tell you that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. And if it didn't, there was still no reason for Bush to invade Iraq, there was no evidence they were a threat to us.
Do those libs honestly believe there is a peaceful solution to all this? That we were supposed to sit on our asses and wait for them to strike first?
I thought when I came on this blog that I would be able to debate the issue and relieve some of my anger and frustrations with other Americans who are just as upset as I was. Now, all I'm getting is even MORE angry and upset because there are so many people out there who would rather sympathize with foreigners than our own soldiers that are getting killed or maimed. I just don't get why any red blooded American would not want their country to stand up for itself.
Posted by: Laura at November 06, 2004 07:44 PM (ptOpl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
If you're stupid, please don't vote
Since most of my intro classes are taught on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, today afforded me the last opportunity to give some advice to students who are about to get their election cherries popped. Here's what I told them:
DON'T VOTE.
PS-Amen.
Posted by: Rusty at
01:09 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 54 words, total size 1 kb.
Osama Speech Mistranslated (Urgent!)
by Demosophist
According to MEMRI the Osam speech delivered on Saturday threatens each individual state in thet US that votes in favor of Bush. So, I guess that means that New York is OK but Virginia is "in trouble" unless we can float the excuse that his message was garbled by the press. Boy, if Hawaii goes for Bush they're sure gonna kick themselves, huh? From MEMRI:
more...
Posted by: Demosophist at
10:50 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 229 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Well now, that makes me a little prouder than normal to be from Texas. I hope that he brings his best and, packs a lunch.
Posted by: dick at November 01, 2004 10:55 AM (hu9UN)
2
Now we're getting silly. Please cancel this one. Some of these pussies will believe it and vote for osama oops! Kerry. Same thing.
Posted by: greyrooster at November 01, 2004 10:59 AM (CBNGy)
3
This is the most ridiculous, fraudulant, venomous campaign I've ever been alive to witness!
My God, what will "they" think of next??? Time's running out, I guess.
Posted by: Laura at November 01, 2004 11:53 AM (ptOpl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Terrorist Factory Fallacy
by Demosophist
It's a pretty gloomy Monday. The Redskins lost yesterday, the polls are ambiguous at best, a speech by Osama against Bush gets spun so that it helps Kerry, and logical fallacies repeated with mind-numbing frequency at a setting of 11 on the volume knob seem to count for valid argument. Beldar holds the theory that we're "creating terrorists" in about as much esteem as the theory that leaving the meat at room temperature will spontaneously generate maggots:
more...
Posted by: Demosophist at
07:53 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 293 words, total size 2 kb.
87kb generated in CPU 0.04, elapsed 0.1915 seconds.
129 queries taking 0.1658 seconds, 364 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.