October 17, 2005
First Question Concerning Enantiomorphism, With Profound Consequences for Shelby Foote's Theories About Union Constraints During the American Civil War:
And also for contemporary American geopolitical policy in the so-called "War on Terror."
So, just how do you tie one hand behind your back? I mean, as opposed to tying both of them?
Discuss...
Posted by: Demosophist at
09:39 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 72 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Any enantiomorphic superpositions of historical analyses are fundamentally disadvantaged by the chiral nature of time.
Posted by: a4g at October 17, 2005 10:49 AM (2GSc/)
2
when one hand ws tied behind the back it was typically fixed to the belt holding up ones pants
Posted by: john Ryan at October 17, 2005 11:41 AM (ads7K)
3
What the hell does "Enantiomorphism" mean? Damn, now I have to go look it up....
You and your big words.
Posted by: WunderKraut at October 17, 2005 02:22 PM (e2V/e)
4
Yeah I heard that the discusion in Iraq is aobut our civil war and parallels. I wish they would lookin into how what it really cost both north and south in terms of lives and money and suffering. If they look past the brave accounts of hero's to the real cost of that ware they will know why spilling blood here results in immediate reaction from the US. Too much of our blood soaks this nation. To let anyone else ever do that again is unacceptable. So Mr. Iraq think about that. Be smart before you actually get what you are talking about. We know all too well.
Posted by: Howie at October 17, 2005 02:59 PM (D3+20)
5
"
Any enantiomorphic superpositions of historical analyses are fundamentally disadvantaged by the chiral nature of time."
I like pie.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 17, 2005 03:30 PM (0yYS2)
6
John:
when one hand ws tied behind the back it was typically fixed to the belt holding up ones pants
Thanks. I'm beginning to see light at the end of the tunnel...
Gabby Hayes in seminal Roy Rogers movie, as he eats the last button attached to his suspenders at the very end of the film: "Mmmmm...." [Camera fades centering on Gabby with his pants around his ankles, mercifully in full 1950s-style long underwear.
Seriously. It happened.
Posted by: Demosophist at October 18, 2005 01:12 AM (AIHNg)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
18kb generated in CPU 0.0153, elapsed 0.0976 seconds.
117 queries taking 0.091 seconds, 247 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
