July 27, 2005

Best News for Labor in 50 Years

By Demosophist

Four dissident unions representing about one-third of the union members in the US will boycott the upcoming AFL-CIO Convention. The boycott is more than symbolic. Two of the unions, the Service Employees Union and the Teamsters, have already withdrawn from the federation. The reason given for the withdrawal, as announced by MSM, is that the AFL-CIO has placed too much emphasis on political lobbying at the expense of membership recruitment, and for once MSM isn't far off the mark. If they've made a mistake in reporting the situation it is that they've allowed the impression that this is just a recent or local dispute, rather than a sea change within the "progressive coalition." But make no mistake, this is the first domino to fall in an ideological orientation that has straight-jacketed the progressive left for more than half a century.

Union density has been declining in the US, and the beginning of the decline can be traced and registered specifically with the establishment of the AFL-CIO. You see, the logic of the merger was precisely the same as the logic behind the establishment of religion in most of Western Europe. The assumption was that strength comes from unity, and that in order to adequately defend the American worker from the whims of management the unions had to operate under a single coordinated leadership. The problem is that once individual unions no longer had direct responsibility for their own programs in competition with other unions they lost the incentive to excel at their representation function.

They also lost the incentive to provide other benefits of union membership, not the least of which concerns the function of a professional association that confers kudos and respect on the people who practice a given occupation. Studies I conducted with Lipset on attitudes toward trade unionism in Canada and the US demonstrated that the segment of the worker population in the "off-diagonals," which includes workers who aren't in a union but want to be, and workers who are in a union but want to be independent, are about evenly split in Canada. In the US, however, they're almost all in the non-union category. Nearly everyone in the US who doesn't want to be in a union, isn't in one. However, there are a lot of people who would like to be in something like a union, but don't like any of the unions that represent their choices.

The reason the US is the most religious nation in the Western world is simply because we're sectarian. There are lots of little churches instead of one big one. All the little churches have to compete with one another for members, so they excel at the task. They manage to fulfill whatever it is that people are looking for in a religion, and also manage to steer clear of the taint of being associated with The State. Contrary to what many religious people believe, being too close to The State is bad for religion. The legitimacy of The State is always in periodic ebb and flow, but if the Church is subject to the same judgments determined by how well the State is doing at meeting its political expectations it's the ebb that sticks, and the flow that people forget. The result is a slow and gradual decline in the legitimacy and stature of religion. Church attendance in all countries that had a State Religion is now in single digits. On the other hand, church attendance in the US is higher than anywhere else in the "industrialized world."

But it never occurred to anyone that trade unionism might be subject to the same dynamic whereby the closer it is to The State the less legitimate it becomes, and the less well it accomplishes the task of representation. The events of this week in the AFL-CIO could well be the signs of trade unionism in the US trying to save itself from complete irrelevance and marginalization. Contrary to what the Democrats are saying, this is actually good news for the union movement. Very good news.

(Cross-posted by Demosophist to Demosophia and Anticipatory Retaliation)

Posted by: Demosophist at 01:19 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 700 words, total size 4 kb.

1 If it weren't for unions, half of you would be barefoot and living in shantytowns in the shadow of HELLIBACON.

Posted by: Downing Street Memo at July 27, 2005 08:39 AM (ScqM8)

2 The reason the US is the most religious nation in the Western world is simply because we're sectarian. There are lots of little churches instead of one big one. All the little churches have to compete with one another for members, so they excel at the task. Hear, hear! I've long since decided that if the secularists in America really wanted to eliminate religion as a force in American life, instead of demanding hyperenforcement of their version of the Establishment Clause, what they should be doing is trying to repeal it. Wouldn't it be awesome if it turned out that Madalyn murray O'Hare contributed more to religious revival in modern times, than any ten televangelists?

Posted by: McGehee at July 27, 2005 08:51 AM (S504z)

3 At one time 65% of all Americans were in a union. Now it's 17%. I wonder why they quit? Perhaps they were not getting their moneies worth. I grew up in San Francisco. The most unionized city in America. I don't see them living any better than other areas of the country. I fact with in the cost of housing and living their life styles must be much more stressful. Downing Street Moron: Time to take your medicine. Seeing the little birds again?

Posted by: greyrooster at July 28, 2005 04:55 AM (CBNGy)

4 Klanrooster, the only bird I see is me giving you the finger.

Posted by: Downing Street Memo at July 28, 2005 06:38 AM (ScqM8)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
21kb generated in CPU 0.0224, elapsed 0.1261 seconds.
118 queries taking 0.1169 seconds, 247 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.