mypetjawa v. 2.0 (beta) "<i>Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to ev

February 27, 2006

Islamic Militant Executed For Murders Of American Missionaries

Abed Abdul-Razzak Kamil, an Islamic militant, was executed in Yemen today for the murders of three American missionaries:

Yemen ObserverÂ—The Ibb Appeal Court executed this morning by a firing squad Abed Abdul-Razzak Kamil, who killed three American missionaries in Jibla, 5 km to the south of a southern province of Ibb in 2002.
The execution took place in the yard of the central prison of Ibb, which was attended by prison, police and judicial officials.
Some staff of American embassy in SanaÂ’a attended the execution, however, no confirmation made from the US embassy in Sana'a. ...

Abed Abdul-Razzak Kamil was convicted of killing American missionaries Martha C. Myers, William Koehn, and Kathleen A. Gariety.

Cross-posted at OpinionBug.com

Posted by: OpinionBug at 12:52 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 133 words, total size 1 kb.

Wipe Them Out

When Saudi security forces learned the location of the al-Qaeda cell that perpertrated last weeks attempted bombing of oil facilities, the order was given and carried out.

Herald Sun News : Security sources said that according to their information the suspects holed up in the Al-Yarmuk quarter of Riyadh, who battled police for an hour after being surrounded in the early morning, were linked to the Abqaiq attack.
"Five armed wanted men were killed today," a police officer said. "Large quantities of arms and explosives as well as material destined to prepare car bombs have been seized."
The suspects "used grenades in a bid to flee but they were prevented in doing so. The clashes are over. The (suspects') lair was assaulted and we killed those we found there".

IÂ’m feeling in touch with my dark side today. After all it has a 2% advantage!

Al-ZaqueeryÂ’s Â“BuddyÂ” caught too.

Yahoo News : Iraqiya named the man as Abu Farouq and said he was captured with five others in the Sunni insurgent stronghold of Ramadi, west of the capital.
It said Abu Farouq al-Suri, previously unknown to the media, was captured by the Wolf Brigade, one of several counter-insurgency units operating within the Shi'ite-run Interior Ministry but accused by Sunnis of targeting civilians in their community.

I trust you find your accommodations comfortable, Princess?

Posted by: Howie at 12:26 PM | Comments (16) | Add Comment
Post contains 225 words, total size 2 kb.

1 It's a real b*tch when the chickens finally come home. The level of response is interesting. The attack was against a Saudi owned facility, prompting a massive, violent response. I don't recall this level of action being taken after expat compounds and interests were attacked. The reports of the aftermath of those attacks usually involved the bad guys getting away somehow.

Posted by: Graeme at February 27, 2006 12:46 PM (6gSrm)

2 Yes they got a little too close to the smokehouse on that one.

Posted by: Howie at February 27, 2006 12:51 PM (D3+20)

3 So much for "the clash of cultures".... Now to this "previously unknown" Zarqawi associate captured by the Wolf Brigade (a group trained by James Steele, and associates as part of the Salvador Option).... You gotta wonder... "The Father of Farouk from Syria" hell of a name.... at least they didn't make the usual claim he is "number 2"...here's a partial list of Zarqawi operatives supposedly caught. Seems like he has an infinite supply.... "The No. 2 official in the al-Qaida in Iraq organization.' "The top deputy to Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi." Mohammed Salah Sutton, aka Abu Zubair (8/14/05) "A lieutenant of al-Qaida terror boss Abu Musab al Zarqawi." Abu Abd al-Aziz (7/13/05) "Zarqawi's 'main leader in Baghdad'" Khalid Suleiman Darwish, aka Abu Alghadiya (6/26/05) A Syrian dentist...was described by Arab media as the 'number two' in Iraq's al Qaeda network and tipped to succeed its leader Abu Musab Al Zarqawi." Mohammed Khalaf Shakar, aka Abu Talha (6/17/05) "A top lieutenant of terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi." Mullah Mahdi, aka Abu Abdul Rahman (6/4/05) "Suspected deputy of terrorist leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi" Abu Karrar (5/27/05) "The Washington Post quoted a Zarqawi lieutenant by the nom-de-guerre of Abu Karrar as saying the Jordanian militant was shot and wounded in fighting with US forces near the western city of Ramadi." Mullah Kamel al-Assawadi (5/25/05) "Described as one of al-Zarqawi's top lieutenants." Agha Umar (5/25/05) "A top aide to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi" Amar Adnan Muhammad Hamzah al-Zubaydi, aka Abu al-Abbas (5/9/05) "A high-ranking aide to terrorist leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi." Ghassan Muhammed Amin Husayn al-Rawi (4/26/05) "A key associate of Iraq's most wanted militant, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi." Hamza Ali Ahmed al-Wdimizyar, aka Abu Majid (beginning of April-05) "Zarqawi associate" Salman Aref Abulkadir Khwamurad al-Zardowe, aka Abu Sharif (beginning of April-05) "Zarqawi associate" Taifor Abulsattar Malallah (3/8/05) "One of the 'princes' of Musab al-Zarqawi's terrorist group." Talib Mikhlif Arsan Walman al-Dulaymi, aka Abu Qutaybah (2/25/05) "Iraqi forces have captured a man described as a trusted aide to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi." Mohammed Najm Ibrahim, aka Mohammed Najm (2/25/05) "Zarqawi lieutenant" Adel Mujtaba, aka Abu Rim (2/20/05) "A propaganda chief of al-Qaeda's frontman in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi" Anat Mohammed Hamat al-Kays, aka Abu Alid (1/28/05) "High-level Zarqawi lieutenant" Sami Mohammed Ali Said Jaaf, aka Abu Omar Kurdi (1/25/05) "A senior aide to Abu Musab al Zarqawi" "The 'most lethal' top lieutenant of Al Qaeda's leader in Iraq." Ismael Jeddan (1/23/05) "The raids also netted a man identified as Ismael Jeddan, an alleged associate of al-Zarqawi." Ali Hamad Ardani Yasin Isawi (1/20/05) "top lieutenant" Inad Mohammed Qais (1/20/05) "The deputy prime minister for national security affairs, Barham Salih, later told a news conference that authorities have arrested a third Zarqawi lieutenant." Salah Salman Idaaj Matar Luhaybi, aka Abu Sayf (12/31/04) "Zarqawi's chief of operations in Baghdad" Fadil Hussain Ahmed al-Kurdi, aka Abu Ubaydah al-Kurdi, aka Ridha (12/30/04) "A senior member of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's network." Abdul Aziz Sa'dun Ahmed Hamduni, aka Abu Ahmed (12/22/04) "Zarqawi-linked leader" Hassan Ibrahim Farhan Zyda (12/14/04) "An aide to Iraq's most-wanted man, Jordanian Islamist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi" Abu Saeed (11/26/04) "A lieutenant of Iraq's most feared terrorist leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi" Nameless (10/23/04) The US military has arrested a 'senior leader' in the network run by Jordanian mastermind Abu Musab al-Zarqawi." Omar Yusef Juma'a, aka Abu Anas al-Shami (9/25/04) "A senior aide of the Jordanian al Qaeda mastermind, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi" Umar Baziyani (6/4/04) "A top aide of al-Qaeda suspect Abu Musab al-Zarqawi" "His capture removes one of Zarqawi's most valuable officers from his network." Abu Mohammed Hamza (2/24/04) "A key lieutenant to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi." Hassan Ghul (2/23/04) "The letter was found on al-Zarqawi lieutenant Hassan Ghul, a Pakistani captured in Iraq." The letter in reference was a "17-page letter to senior al Qaeda leaders written by terror mastermind Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who asked for help starting a Muslim civil war between Iraqi Sunnis and Shiites." Nameless (4/30/03) "An associate of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi has been captured in the Baghdad area." From the looks of it, I guess everyone in Iraq is about two-degrees from Zarqawi.

Posted by: 8ackgr0und N015e at February 27, 2006 01:16 PM (jsv7b)

4 Background noise seems amazed at what most of the world calls 'dead mans boots' The promotion of a lesser ranked individual, to the position of the last man killed/captured. He must be fascinated by twinking lights.

Posted by: dave at February 27, 2006 01:21 PM (CcXvt)

5 Please when referring to Zarqawi associates please take the time the edit all Prince to Princess.

Posted by: Howie at February 27, 2006 01:21 PM (D3+20)

6 Can you just imaging the sinking feeling when he comes up puts his arm around you and says, "I like you Abdulla, You are doing a really fine job and I think you deserve more credit and a position worthy of your work".

Posted by: Howie at February 27, 2006 01:25 PM (D3+20)

7 You are in command now, Admiral Piett!

Posted by: Ernie Oporto at February 27, 2006 01:39 PM (/lpvu)

8 Gee... and you just swallow this crap without even thinking about it... hmmm Wonder what ever happened to all those Saddam doubles.... whatever happened to all those shark tanks....whatever happened to all those WMD.... hmmmm and now a group trained by the guy who trained Salvadoran death squads trots out a guy no one has ever heard of and says he is some Zarqawi hotshot and you buy it.... hmmmmm here's the funny part... you ever wonder how they keep getting the guy NEXT to Zarqawi but never get him? I mean how fast can a one legged guy run? hmmmmm == It's not fair to denigrate mindless Bush supporters. For those of you who are mindless Bush supporters, "denigrate" means "belittle".

Posted by: 8ackgr0und N015e at February 27, 2006 04:13 PM (jsv7b)

9 Oh it was not that serious man. That's why it got slapped in there with the Saudi deal. He was commander of the other five or else he was the one they didn't like. It's just news. Do we have to argue till the cows come home about just how big a deal it is?

Posted by: Howie at February 27, 2006 04:29 PM (D3+20)

10 He's a bit sensitive Howie, you're dark is all too obvious in this one and that's bad news, for more than just terrorists.

Posted by: Javapuke at February 27, 2006 04:47 PM (0dTzo)

11 background noise: I haven't got any pictures, so you might not understand it. I know you would prefer chunky Crayola but I'll try and make you understand. Terrorists work in "cells" these cells work independent of each other. One cell has no operational ties, to another cell. The structure is based, like a pyramid. The bottom being the lowest members, the next tier are most likely "commanders", the next tier "local lieutenants" of multiple cells, followed by lieutenants, till you finally get to the Z man. You capture a cell member, he will not even know of the other cells operating, you capture the "commander" of the cell, he most likely knows the next man in the chain. To make it less confusing for you, I'll say this: It is unlikely even the 2nd lieutenant has even sat in the same room as Zarqawi in a very long time. Most of the cells do not communicate between each other by technology, but by courier -- hence the intercepted written words between members. now go back to your tickle-me-elmo coloring book.

Posted by: dave at February 27, 2006 05:30 PM (CcXvt)

12 C'mon, it's the media who keeps telling us it's Zarqawi's second-in-command, or his first lieutenant twice removed or his top-aide's godmother's first ex-husband's best friend. Does anyone really think the media has a clue? Nevermind - don't answer that. Of course we don't take it seriously! As long as it's an Islamo-jihadist, I'm happy - I don't care who he's related to or is commanded by, as long as he's dead.

Posted by: Oyster at February 27, 2006 05:42 PM (YudAC)

13 Capturing terrorists is good. But you have no idea who this guy is... and the report did not come from the US military. It came from the Wolf Brigade. They are implicated in death squad activities. You would think with all the middle management swept up that Zarqawi has no one to lead. Even crazy old Don Rumsfeld says we have created more terrorists than we can kill. In light of that admission, blithely hoping that everyone of the bad guys is captured and no one is inflaming the situation is foolish. Fortunately, we can see how this "War on Terrorism" is going - by the administration's own accounting. Here is a story that most folks missed in the furor over the Cheney shooting. Admittedly it isn't as sexy as getting shot in the face, but the news of the The National Counterterrorism Center terrorist suspect list should give you sanguine folks some pause. According to the National Counterterrorism Center there are 325,000 names on their terrorism suspect list. That is more people than worked in New Orleans prior to Katrina (and a hell of lot more than work there now). This came to light after 30,000 people were mistakenly matched to the no fly list. What the hell does that mean? Suspected terrorists have a 90% chance of getting a seat in first class as long as their name isn't Cat Stevens? But hey.... let's compare apples to apples and look at how things have gone since we invaded Iraq and made it a central front on the GWOT. In 2003 they only had 75,000 names on the NCC list. Now we have almost 5x as many. They're spawning faster than rabbits. Donald Rumsfeld is right. We are literally creating terrorists faster than we can kill them... actually 10x faster (assuming all the civilian deaths in Iraq were terrorists). Since 2002 we have spent almost 400 Billion on the War on Terrorism. In other words, it costs us more than a million dollars a pop to create just one terrorist! That is insane! Good thing we are fighting them over there...we can't afford to keep creating them over here! I don't know where people find their confidence given this administration's approach to forecasting. Consider the original cost of the war in Iraq (50 Billion) vs. now (400 Billion and counting). Consider the duration of the war (6 months) vs. now (20 years). consider the deficit projected for 2007 (200 Billion) vs. now (400 Billion). If you look at it that way this list of 325,000 may represent only one quarter of the candidates. Here's the kicker. They don't even have confidence in their own reporting. They tell us that although there are 325,000 names on the list ... the unique names are closer to 250,000. So the original 75,000 they had in 2003 are now reduced to what... a rounding error? == It is not fair to denigrate mindless Bush supporters as ignorant. For mindless Bush supporters, "denigrate" means "make fun of".

Posted by: 8ackgr0und N015e at February 28, 2006 08:36 AM (H7c0g)

14 Dose EMPOROR PALPATINE belong to the AL QUEDA? he sure looks it

Posted by: sandpiper at February 28, 2006 02:09 PM (162Hn)

15 Greg : And you solve this how? Besides bitching day and night night and day.

Posted by: Howie at February 28, 2006 02:20 PM (D3+20)

16 Ziggy

Posted by: Howie at February 28, 2006 02:41 PM (D3+20)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Peacenicks Plan to "Storm" White House

In the lingo of the left, "genocide" = any civilian killed by U.S. troops, regardless of extraordinary measures taken to avoid civilian casualites. It does not include mass murderers in the Sudan bent on wiping out animists, Christians, and black Muslims.

"Torture" = any time the U.S. deprives a prisoner of sleep. "Torture" does not include enforcement of sharia law, in places like Fallujah under the 'resistance', where beheading, arm and tongue amputation, and stoning to death are institutionalized.

"Occupaton" = any time the U.S. liberates a country. It also includes any Jewish majority anywhere. It does not Turkish, Iraqi, Syrian, and Iranian control over Kurdish territory.

United for Peace plans to "storm" the White House to "Stop Genocide, Torture and Occupation".

It's not so much that we're not against genocide, torture, and occupation. It's just that we fundamentally disagree on what those words mean.

Hat tip: Alicia

Posted by: Rusty at 10:14 AM | Comments (11) | Add Comment
Post contains 160 words, total size 1 kb.

1 The beauty of the "fringe" is that it is, and will always be, the "fringe". It has absolutely no growth potential. There are those who either find themselves associated with the "fringe" or choose to embrace it momentarily for gain (love those Dems), who will invaribly be singed and burned by it. Storm away!

Posted by: hondo at February 27, 2006 10:24 AM (fyKFC)

2 Would love to see regular folks show up and block them. But regular folks are too busy holding down a job and providing for their families.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 27, 2006 10:27 AM (8e/V4)

3 Going to be alot of dead hippys on the front lawn. S.Service will f-ing shoot first. Don't these idiots realize they are playing a dangerous game?

Posted by: Filthy Allah at February 27, 2006 11:14 AM (5ceWd)

4 If they were truly against genocide, torture, and occupation, then why have they waited so long? Why haven't they "stormed" the embassies of those countries which commit these things regularly? Why aren't they sending letters to Castro? Why not march in groups of thousands shouting slogans against Lybia, Syria, Iran, etc? Why don't they stand outside Saudi-run mosques with signs that say "Stop preaching hatred" and "Hate-mongers go home"? These are, of course, rhetorical questions.

Posted by: Oyster at February 27, 2006 11:33 AM (7YTVr)

5 Oyster ha ha ha - of course you know! Actually some of them would indeed support (and possibly participate in) genocide, torture, and occupation if the opportunity ever arose for them reference one of their own causes or goals. They would just rationalize it differently. We are their "enemy" - and the above is just lingo in that battle.

Posted by: hondo at February 27, 2006 11:51 AM (fyKFC)

6 Storm away, I say, but none of the assholes will be down here where I'm at. Damn, I miss all the fun!

Posted by: jesusland joe at February 27, 2006 06:52 PM (rUyw4)

7 On the definition of "Occupation". Don't forget that, according to the left, the US Military "Occupied" New Orleans. Apparently America is under US occupation.

Posted by: celestial at February 28, 2006 12:50 AM (cwlpC)

8 "Storm" = "Encounter the Secret Service and 'bravely run away, away, away, away....'"

Posted by: LC CanForce 101 at February 28, 2006 03:15 AM (3smJS)

9 And it will stay that way, celestial. If these leftists want to see some action, I would just love for them to attempt a coup. The military and patriotic civilians in this country would wipe them from the face of the earth.

Posted by: jesusland joe at February 28, 2006 10:13 AM (rUyw4)

10 Let them there will be quite a few of these reptiles with will REST IN PEACE right in the grave these people are the real extremists they are the equivalint to AL QUEDA

Posted by: sandpiper at February 28, 2006 02:12 PM (162Hn)

11 If you educated yourself on the true actions of the U.S. CIA and NSA, you would understand that their is no liberation going on in Iraq. The sweeping house raids and systematic murder of innocent people is all designed for one purpose - Corporate Rule and Corporate Theft of Other People's Resources. Stop pretending that your country cares about anything other than money. Stop pretending that they are on your side. They are not concerned with anyone other than their wealthy group of corporations, and the pollution, genocide, port deals and 911 were all arranged by PNAC a long time ago. If security was a real issue, then why did Bush make a deal with United Arab Emirates (pilots of 911 planes) and why did George's brother Marvin arrange the planting of controlled demolition in the WTC and arrange the "terrorist insurance" for his buddy Silverstein. Stop being conned, wake up and smell the coffee. Watch this interview with a CIA hitman and learn something http://play.rbn.com/?url=demnow/demnow/demand/2006/feb/audio/dn20060215.ra&proto=rtsp The crimes of other countries does not make our crimes okay. We cannot change Syria's government, but we have the obligation to try to change ours. If you don't care about living in a dictatorship, then do nothing and keep believing the stupidity propaganda they throw at you, as if you are 10 years old.

Posted by: Darrow Boggiano at March 05, 2006 06:28 PM (cjH6k)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

RINO's with Rhoids

This week's RINO sightings is up at ex-donkey's.

Posted by: Rusty at 09:04 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 14 words, total size 1 kb.

Jill Carroll Execution Deadline Passes

The deadline set by terrorists in which they claimed they would murder American reporter Jill Carroll if all female prisoners in Iraq were not released has passed. No word on the fate of Jill Carroll.

We pray Jill Carroll is released unharmed.

The good news is that that several similar deadlines have already passed, so hopefully the SOBs holding Jill Carroll are just making idle threats.

Washington Post:

"The Ministry of Interior said that she is alive and that they have information with regard to where she might be held," Khalilzad said in an interview with Fox News.
"The minister announced today that he is optimistic about her release," he said.
The U.S. ambassador did not say how the Interior Ministry knew about Carroll's well-being.
An apparent deadline set by kidnappers holding Carroll in Iraq passed Sunday with no word.

Posted by: Rusty at 08:11 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 149 words, total size 1 kb.

Gay Pudding Eating Cowboys

Top Rejected Titles For Brokeback Mountain

The Ox-Blow Incident
The Gerbil Whisperer

More.

Posted by: Rusty at 08:02 AM | Comments (14) | Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.

UAE, Drug Smuggling, and al Qaeda

Dubai (one of the member states of the UAE) is known as the 'Switzerland' of the Middle East. Why? It's not because of their long tradition of neutrality and better-than-average cheese making abilities. No, it's Dubai's don't ask, don't tell attitude about people doing business in that country.

American Spectator:

Dawood Ibrahim himself is, by all accounts, living in Pakistan, but his baby brother Anees -- another suspect in the 1993 bombing -- was recently hanging around in Dubai. In 2002, Emirates authorities arrested Anees, and India finally expected to be able to bring him to account. But rather than extradite him to India, the UAE abruptly released him on bail and deported him back to the brier patch -- Pakistan....
Anees Ibrahim wasn't the only narcoterrorist who cashed in a "get out of jail free" card in the Emirates. Another suspect in the Mumbai bombing named Abu Salem was captured in UAE in 2001, and then quickly released before India could even request his extradition. Salem was later picked up in Lisbon, Portugal, after spending some time in Atlanta and attracting the attention of the FBI. Indian journalists and politicians report that Salem, after falling out with D-Company, had taken up with al Qaeda.
I don't doubt that the UAE has provided a great deal of assistance to the United States in the War on Terror, for which we ought to be grateful. And all nations will have organized crime of one variety or another, so the presence of some wiseguys in Dubai doesn't disqualify them from doing business in the USA. My point is that these particular gangsters are also Islamic terrorists with serious links to al Qaeda, and there is precious little evidence that Dubai is serious about stopping them.

Related satire on the UAE ports deal.

Related report from HNN.

Posted by: Rusty at 07:56 AM | Comments (27) | Add Comment
Post contains 315 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Rusty All true - but we are still not talking about the UAE govt, the Company involved, or the country itself. As pointed out - organized crime can not be found just anywhere - but virtually everywhere. On the point of criminal activity, they will gravitate to the weakess points anywhere - and the UAE is surprisingly not one of them. For this you should look closer at South America and SE Asia. Some should do a little research on a big player behind the scenes pushing the Dems and others - the affected unions here in the US. There is a fascinating story here with a lot of history - they were once one of the largest and most powerful (and corrupt) unions in the nation. At one time, they had more power and influence over this country than the UAW or Mine Workers. The way we run and operate our ports today began slowly in the early '70s as a direct result and reaction to them.

Posted by: hondo at February 27, 2006 10:14 AM (fyKFC)

2 Not six ports as falsely reported. It's really 21 ports! [excerpted under fair use] UAE terminal takeover extends to 21 ports By PAMELA HESS UPI Pentagon Correspondent WASHINGTON, Feb. 24 (UPI) -- A United Arab Emirates government-owned company is poised to take over port terminal operations in 21 American ports, far more than the six widely reported. The Bush administration has approved the takeover of British-owned Peninsular & Oriental Steam Navigation Co. to DP World, a deal set to go forward March 2 unless Congress intervenes. P&O is the parent company of P&O Ports North America, which leases terminals for the import and export and loading and unloading and security of cargo in 21 ports, 11 on the East Coast, ranging from Portland, Maine to Miami, Florida, and 10 on the Gulf Coast, from Gulfport, Miss., to Corpus Christi, Texas, according to the company's Web site. President George W. Bush on Tuesday threatened to veto any legislation designed to stall the handover. Read the rest @ http://www.upi.com/SecurityTerrorism/view.php?StoryID=20060223-051657-4981r

Posted by: Natasha at February 27, 2006 02:18 PM (i6py+)

3 "Some should do a little research on a big player behind the scenes pushing the Dems and others - the affected unions here in the US." Oh my GOD! Why that's criminal! Imagine that. An elected US official trying to keep Americans from loosing even more jobs. tsk tsk Why can't Bush do that? Oh. That's right. He's cutting deals with foreign governments selling the US infrastructure to the highest bidders instead!

Posted by: Natasha at February 27, 2006 02:24 PM (i6py+)

4 ITS PORT TERMINALS/BERTHINGS! NOT THE PORTS! THERE ARE (AS FAR AS I KNOW) APX 900 SUCH FACILITIES AROUND THIS NATION. THE DEAL IS FOR 21 SAID FACILITIES. What pisses me off most about all this is the deliberate (DELIBERATE) attempts to equate Port with port terminals, and port terminal operations with Port Security/Operations. I know exactly what Port entails courtesy my past years 1st hand experience in Port/Harbor operations with the USACE Harbor Operations Port of NY/NJ. And I know the BS being thrown about.

Posted by: hondo at February 27, 2006 02:34 PM (fyKFC)

5 John Buchanan, lamented Clinton doing the same thing, back when Bill was President. {excerpted under fair use] A Chinese Naval Base -- at Long Beach by Patrick J. Buchanan March 13, 1997 "And last year, Johnny Chung, who gave $366,000 to the Democratic National Committee, showed up for a Clinton radio broadcast at the White House, with six Chinese in tow, including an adviser of Cosco. The president begged off being photographed with his guests, which raises a question: If Bill Clinton is leery of being seen with these characters, why is he giving them a Long Beach naval base?... Does anyone care about national security anymore?" Read the rest @ http://www.buchanan.org/pa-97-0313.html [end excerpt] Clinton sold the Long Beech California Port to the Chinese commies?! Those damned liberals! That adulterous slimy lying bastard Clinton! Sadly, he is not alone, in the selling of America. Here is a really incredible coincidence too. The UAE based multinational corporation, set to buy 21 Ports in the US, also gave "us" a gift also, just weeks before the UAE Ports deal was announced. Only Bush must be a better salesman than Clinton, because he got "us" 366 MILLION dollars! It supposedly went to the Katrina relief effort. Who knows. Why would a supposed conservative, hell bent on National Security and improving our economy, sell off our infrastructure? Really, it doesn't matter what foreign outfit he sells them to, or which party is involved now obviously. The question is why? Bush does not need the money, and it didn't go to him. I guess. So what the hell is going on? Could globalization have anything to with this, and does that have anything to with Globalism? Of course it does. What the hell is Globalism, and who are these guys anyway? Now that is THE question, and here is the answer. George W Bush, like his father, is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, as are both Bill and Hillary Clinton, Dick Cheney, Carl Rove, Donnie Rumsfeld, and yes of course John Kerry and other phony liberals and phony conservatives also. WHAT THE HELL! WHO ARE THESE GUYS? The Council on Foreign Relations strongly advocates such deals, referring to the practice as "proactive global interdependence", touting it also as a necessary step toward WORLD GOVERNMENT. That's right. the CFR is a Globalist organization. They want a world government, 'and' they want to 'be' that world government. How could they ever hope to accomplish this?! Well, nobody is stopping them, and they can certainly afford it, because "they" are also BIG OIL, not just here in the US but everywhere on earth. Now that is some serious economic power right there. The CFR along with the Bilderburg Group, seems to be the headship of globalization, and they have long advocated "Corporate Powerbuilding" as a means to outstrip governments in wealth, in order to then subvert governments everywhere through direct economic influence. Oh by the way. Did I mention that Bush Jr and Sr, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Carl Rove, John Kerry, and others you have heard of recently, are also members of the Bilderburg Group? SURPRISE! They are! So is the owner of FOX, and many other media owners, major newscasters, and yes even some cute and fuzzy pundits are members too. Hello, Rush? Is that why you are so well fed? How could it even be possible, for this group of super wealthy corporate heads 'and' heads of state the world over, to ever hope to take over governments all over the world? Can they do it? Well obviously, they have so much money now, they can both buy the infrastructure 'and' the political cooperation necessary. In effect they are buying the world as we speak. Both Clinton and Bush, and Reagan and Carter, and Ford, and others, have been selling our nation all along, like, well, like hotcakes. How does that make you feel? Wont it be wonderful?! Imagine the same ethic displayed by EXXON, McDonalds, "The Good Guys", WAL-MART and that place you slave at, applied mercilessly on a global scale, without the government or civil restrictions now protecting you. Wont it be great?! Do you think maybe they (repubs and dems alike), got us all so divided and blinded with partisan squabbling, thanks Rush, that we didn't notice what they were up to in secret behind our backs? Ya think? I mean do you think at all? "Fascism should more rightly be called corporatism, as it is the merging of State and Corporate power." - Benito Mussolini

Posted by: Natasha at February 27, 2006 04:12 PM (i6py+)

6 And the Queen Of England is behind the drug trade - oh where have I've heard this before? You forgot the Free Masons, the Iluminiti - oh, lets not forget a few International Zionists now and then - there are more but I forget ...

Posted by: hondo at February 27, 2006 06:38 PM (fyKFC)

7 Go to the CFR website and read for yourself you dork. Geez. Some people. If isn't something they see on FOX news it has to be conspiracy theory stuff. Oh wait. This info 'has' been on FOX News! CNN even went into it a bit, but it is certainly not a "conspiracy theory" by a long shot. These convenience stores have got to start checking IDs and stop selling beer to teenagers.

Posted by: Natasha at February 27, 2006 07:18 PM (i6py+)

8 Natasha, the Larouche blog is elsewhere, mmkay? I know people who have worked for the CFR and even a couple who are on it. They're not pursuing some sinister globalist agenda.

Posted by: See-Dubya at February 27, 2006 07:49 PM (XZwOh)

9 That's right - I'm a dork and an illiterate moron - and your a genius. Feel better? Why don't you share your intellect with the Mensa board - doubt if anyone here is interested in your special part of the fringe.

Posted by: hondo at February 27, 2006 07:59 PM (fyKFC)

10 Fringe? My that is an old term. You never hear that one used anymore. Funny how first we have an "expert" who managed ports or some such thing, and now there is someone who "knows people in the CFR", and of course don't worry everything is just fine. Meanwhile they will continue to sell our ports, railway system, highways, bridges and airports to foreign corporations. People are waking up though. People are beginning to realize what is going on, and they do not like it one bit.

Posted by: Natasha at February 27, 2006 11:52 PM (i6py+)

11 Yes, funny, isn't it? In fact it's not just funny; I'd say it's hilarious. Because by your "logic" knowledge based on ignorance is more reliable than knowledge based on familiarity. Someone who knows absolutely nothing about port management or the CFR is a more reliable source of information about this question than someone who does. (Psst, Hondo, she's on to us! She's discovered that we're really part of the vast conspiracy ourselves! Call Alliance headquarters and have them execute operation "Dumbass" against "Natasha". They'll know what to do.)

Posted by: See-Dubya at February 28, 2006 12:12 AM (XZwOh)

12 Nah! I'm just going to have them beam her aboard the mother ship then park her in orbit. Yes, it is an old term - I'm an old guy - and it does fit.

Posted by: hondo at February 28, 2006 12:37 AM (fyKFC)

13 excerpted from Click 2 Houston @ http://www.click2houston.com/news/7397234/detail.html?rss=hou&psp=news United Arab Emirates Donated At Least $1M To Bush Library POSTED: 7:37 am CST February 24, 2006 HOUSTON -- A sheik from the United Arab Emirates contributed at least $1 million to the Bush Library Foundation, which established the George Bush Presidential Library at Texas A&M University in College Station. The UAE owns Dubai Ports World, which is taking operations from London-based Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co., which operates six U.S. ports. A political uproar has ensued over the deal, which the White House approved without congressional oversight. Dubai Ports World offered Thursday night to delay part of the takeover to give the Bush administration more time to convince lawmakers the deal poses no security risks. The donations were made in the early 1990s for the library, which houses the papers of former President George Bush, the current president's father. The list of donors names Sheik Zayed Bin Sultan al Nahyan and the people of the United Arab Emirates as one donor in the $1 million or more category. The amount of the gift grants them recognition on the engraved donor wall in the library entrance or on the paving bricks that line the library's walkways, according to library documents. Roman Popaduik, chairman of the Bush Library Foundation that collects donations, said he could not discuss details of the gifts except to say the amount category and whether it was before or after 1997. The chief executive of the Dubai company, Ahmed bin Sulayem, did not donate individually. The hundreds of large donors include longtime Bush associates, including Vice President Dick Cheney and other administration officials as well as business titans -- such as Enron Corp. founder Kenneth Lay -- and big Republican donors. Other Arab donors include the state of Kuwait, the Bandar bin Sultan family, the Sultanate of Oman, King Hassan II of Morocco and the amir of Qatar. The former Korean prime minister and China also gave tens of thousands of dollars to the library.

Posted by: Natasha at February 28, 2006 12:38 AM (i6py+)

14 I think I chipped in 20 bucks too - but I'd have to check my old tax records.

Posted by: hondo at February 28, 2006 12:40 AM (fyKFC)

15 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/23/AR2006022301882.html Role of Sen. Dole's Husband at Issue By Jeffrey H. Birnbaum Washington Post Staff Writer Friday, February 24, 2006; Page A06 The lobbying of former Senate majority leader Robert J. Dole on behalf of the Dubai-owned company set to take over management of terminals at six major U.S. seaports is creating a political problem for his wife, Sen. Elizabeth Dole (R-N.C.). The chairman of the North Carolina Democratic Party, Jerry Meek, yesterday called on Sen. Dole to remove herself from "any congressional oversight" of the Dubai port deal. "The fact that Dubai is paying her husband to help pass the deal presents both a financial and ethical conflict of interest for Senator Dole," Meek said. A spokeswoman for Sen. Dole rejected the criticism as "a partisan attack" and defended the senator's role as a lawmaker and her husband's as a lobbyist. "Elizabeth Dole knows that her work is separate from Bob Dole," said her spokeswoman, Lindsay Taylor Mabry. "Bob Dole works for a law firm. Elizabeth Dole works for the people of North Carolina." Former senator Dole (R-Kan.), 82, said in a written statement yesterday that he is not going to lobby his wife or members of Congress. His law firm, Alston & Bird LLP, helped steer the application of Dubai Ports World through the federal bureaucracy over the past few months, and Dole signed on as a lobbyist for the company this week. His spokesman would not say what lobbying, if any, Alston & Bird is now doing in Congress; the firm's spokeswoman did not return telephone messages. Dubai Ports World beefed up its lobbying efforts, including on Capitol Hill, after lawmakers threatened this week to scuttle the transaction. The lawmakers said they feared that national security might be compromised by letting a Middle Eastern firm manage key U.S. ports. Dole's statement said he will confine his lobbying to the Bush administration. "I have not nor will I 'lobby' Members of Congress on this issue, not even at home," he wrote. "I have not discussed the port issue with any Senator or member of Congress or anyone working for the Congress, nor will I do so in the months to come." The controversy confronting the Doles is an increasingly common one in Washington. According to Public Citizen's Congress Watch, at least three dozen members of Congress have relatives who are professional lobbyists. Congress Watch and other watchdog groups have loudly criticized the growing trend. "What better way to buy access to a lawmaker than to hire the lawmaker's son, daughter or spouse as their lobbyist on a lucrative retainer?" said Craig Holman, a lobbyist for Congress Watch. Some of Congress's most prominent members have relatives on K Street. House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) has a son, Josh Hastert, who works as a lobbyist for PodestaMattoon. The son of former Senate majority leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.), Chester Trent Lott Jr., lobbies for the Livingston Group. A son-in-law of Senate Minority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) is a lobbyist, as are the wives of both Democratic senators from North Dakota -- one for professional baseball, the other for insurance companies. In addition, sons of two senior members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.) and Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah), are lobbyists. The father of Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.), former senator Birch Bayh (D-Ind.), lobbies, as does the wife of House Majority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.). Blunt's connection to Altria Group Inc., the tobacco and consumer products company that his wife works for, was an issue in his unsuccessful bid to become majority leader. Lawmakers defend their connections with lobbyists as just another byproduct of the modern world in which spouses are often professionals, as are their children. Lawmakers also state that their lobbyist relatives do not lobby them personally. Blunt's wife does not lobby the House of Representatives, a Blunt spokeswoman said. Hastert's son refrains from lobbying the House Republican leadership. Amid news media scrutiny a few years ago, Reid imposed a prohibition against any lobbying in his office by relatives. Still, the issue remains sensitive. Various proposals to change lobbying laws amid the Jack Abramoff political corruption scandal have included bans on lobbying by relatives of lawmakers.

Posted by: Natasha at February 28, 2006 12:55 AM (i6py+)

16 Not a conspiracy. Oh no. That never happens. Everything is fine. Our leader is in control. You are safe. SLEEP

Posted by: Natasha at February 28, 2006 12:58 AM (i6py+)

17 Lawmakers assail deal giving Dubai firm control of ports BY MICHAEL MCAULIFFNew York Daily News WASHINGTON - The Bush administration gave control of six crucial ports to a Sept. 11-linked Arab nation after a flimsy investigation and with weak guarantees the company in charge can stop Osama bin Laden from infiltrating, the House homeland security chairman said. "There are conditions, which shows they had concerns, but it's all procedural and relies entirely on good faith," Rep. Pete King, R-N.Y., told the New York Daily News. "There's nothing those conditions ... nothing that assures us they're not hiring someone with bin Laden." The firm, Dubai Ports World, owned by the United Arab Emirate of Dubai, cut a $6.8 billion deal last week to buy control of the ports - including Manhattan's cruise ship terminal and Newark, N.J.'s, giant container port - from a British firm. A source with knowledge of the purchase echoed the chairman, telling The News that while Department of Homeland Security administrators rubber-stamped it, senior analysts at the agency were never told, and they don't like it now. News of the sale, approved by a secretive multi-agency panel headed by the Treasury Department, has sparked a growing outcry from both political parties. "It's unbelievably tone-deaf politically at this point in our history, four years after 9/11, to entertain the idea of turning port security over to a company based in the UAE, (which) vows to destroy Israel," Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told "Fox News Sunday." Hearings on the deal have been called for this week in Congress, and Sens. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y, and Bob Menendez, D-N.J., have proposed a law to ban such takeovers. Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., demanded that President Bush personally intervene. "The president must act," he said at a news conference with New York Harbor as a backdrop. "Outsourcing the operations of our largest ports to a country with long involvement in terrorism is a homeland security accident waiting to happen." But the administration is defending the port transfer, pointing out that even though Dubai was an important base for the Sept. 11 plot, the emirate is now an American ally. "You can be assured that before a deal is approved, we put safeguards in place, assurances in place, that make everybody comfortable that we are where we need to be from a national security viewpoint," Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff told ABC's "This Week." But King, who was briefed on the deal by top officials last week, disagreed. "Our investigation was very superficial," he said. "We're talking 20 to 25 days of work, and that includes all the financial aspects and everything else." King said a huge blind spot was the identity of the firm's employees. "All we know are principals and people at the top level," he said. "We don't even know the midlevel guys, who are the ones who will be doing the work, really running things."

Posted by: Natasha at February 28, 2006 01:13 AM (i6py+)

18 Yes - sleep - love it -sleep - more of it! Actually,the key staging base probably for the 9/11 operation was Homburg Germany - you can have a go with this one.

Posted by: hondo at February 28, 2006 01:26 AM (fyKFC)

19 Was the United States sleeping when the deal was going on , or they jews were waiting because the chances were great that a Singaporean company was taking it over,the moment they backed out and Dubai got the deal suddenly the people who were sleeping woke up and started to make a noise about this deal, besides that if they are so eager for the shares why dont the U.S. government buy over the shares of P&O , USA, and let the people feel that they are at ease,,what a country with such naive people,,God help the USA

Posted by: ronnie at February 28, 2006 02:42 AM (+EUV1)

20 No, it's Dubai's don't ask, don't tell attitude about people doing business in that country. This is a bad thing?

Posted by: Mark J at February 28, 2006 03:17 AM (sbNVA)

21 I still can't believe it. People are allowing their attention to be diverted from the most important issue regarding this deal. Yes, there are obvious irregularities and "conflicts of interest" involved, in this little deal really, which are of concern surely. These are sides issues of less importance though, in comparison to the fact that ownership or control, when not both, of our entire infrastructure has already been sold to foreign corporations. It is not just our seaports which have been sold off over the last four Presidential administrations. If only that were all there is to it. No, also our airports, railways system, trucking companies, highways and toll roads, bridges, hospitals, national retail chains, shipping companies, and even most of what little domestic industrial capacity left here to us in the US, have already been sold off. For whatever reason, whether by design or by accident, the public has become aware of some of this because of the DPW of the UAR Ports deal. The electronic media however has not told even half the story. For example DPW is not buying control of a mere 6 ports, but 21 ports in fact. Thus far media coverage has focused on the sensationalist possibilities, which I am certain the Bush admin, both can and will put to rest as they proceed with the deal. Media coverage is also making this a very sensationalized partisan issue. Clearly however both US Parties have been fully complicit all along, in selling control and ownership of our entire infrastructure to the multinational corporate alliance. This same global confederation of Big Corps, doing all the buying, has no loyalty to any nation state. In fact this multinational corporate alliance, is becoming more powerful in wealth (the one true power) than all national governments put together, and they are doing it through the buying of the infrastructure within all nations, everywhere, not just here in the US. Well what can expect of the media? It too is owned and controlled by the same global confederation of corporations.

Posted by: Natasha at February 28, 2006 01:10 PM (i6py+)

22 Someone has seen Robocop one too many times.

Posted by: hondo at February 28, 2006 02:38 PM (fyKFC)

23 I will not rise to the bait being trolled by those who seek to divert the topic of this thread.

Posted by: Natasha at February 28, 2006 02:58 PM (i6py+)

24 Ha ha ha ha ha Now that's funny! Fire & passion! Should hook you up with DU greg.

Posted by: hondo at February 28, 2006 03:27 PM (fyKFC)

25 I thought it was funny too, Hondo. With all the hijacking she's done in other threads, suddenly she's taken the moral high ground. And calls others the trolls. Can't even use a real email. So far she's been unable to hold her own in a debate so now she's clamming up with some pretense of maintaining the integrity of "the thread". Take for instance the last few comments on the Jan. 9th post http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/150526.php Yes, what I just said was off-topic. Sue me. The problem is that even though there's is always some truth to any story, such as all the articles that are quoted at length and ad nauseum regarding these topics, there isn't the level of secret conspiracy implied by the commenter.

Posted by: Oyster at February 28, 2006 04:02 PM (zCI3+)

26 Oyster Similar to greg, the bulk of her(?) posts consists of credited Cut & Paste from others writing - suspect much of what is not credited is also C&P from elsewhere. Same pattern as greg - different spectrum of the "fringe". Don't bother attempting to place her(?) on right/left xy axis - this is one of the multitude of isolated z's.

Posted by: hondo at February 28, 2006 04:26 PM (fyKFC)

27 Public icons of both the left and the right, likewise share membership together in globalist organizations like the CFR and the Bilderburg Group, and obviously they do not really take the left/right political divide seriously. Partisan politics is for weak minded emotion driven fools. They have you right where they want you. Caught up in appearances completely unaware of what they are doing.

Posted by: Natasha at March 01, 2006 11:47 PM (i6py+)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Pamela Rogers Released From Jail

(McMinnville, Tennessee) Convicted child sex offender and former teacher, 28-year-old Pamela Rogers, was released from jail yesterday after completing about six months of her nine month sentence. Rogers (aka Pamela Turner) earned an early release through good behavior.

To refresh everyone's memory, Pamela Rogers Turner (photos) was arrested and charged in February 2005 with 15 counts of sexual battery by an authority figure and 13 counts of statutory rape of one of her students, a 13-year-old boy. In August, she pleaded no contest as part of an agreement with the prosecution and was sentenced. The agreement provided for dismissal of most of the 28 counts against her.

I think it's important to remember that Rogers was convicted of having a three-month sexual affair with a 13-year-old boy. Her crime was a clear case of child sexual abuse by a person in a position of authority and many observers believe Rogers received very lenient treatment by the court.

Her sentence includes seven years probation which, if violated, will send her back to jail. Rogers is already entered into the Tennessee sex offender registry with her photo posted on its website. In addition, she must complete 90 hours of community service.

In summary, the former teacher and former homecoming queen opens a new chapter in her life as an ex-convict and registered sex offender on probation. She forfeited her career, her good name and her marriage. In return, she's blanketed her life and her future with a dark cloud.

Poor decision-making skills produce poor results.

From Interested-Participant.

Posted by: Mike Pechar at 06:14 AM | Comments (21) | Add Comment
Post contains 265 words, total size 2 kb.

1 "Poor decision making skills" - that's funny. I wonder if its OK to say that when its the man with girl? And would he get 6 months? Nooo

Posted by: Javapuke at February 27, 2006 07:13 AM (HbfST)

2 The real emotional effect of a story is when it reduced to an individual with their name beside a picture. This is what has happened to Pamela Joan Rogers. I started studying this story on 11.August.2005, when she took the plea. I watch the coverage on television that night and said she is not guilty. I have spent many hours since then studying the case. Talking with attorney about how it was conducted, talking to investigators about how it was not investigated correctly, talking to individuals that had some knowledge of the case. All this information makes me one hundred percent sure that I am correct when I say she is not guilty of anything. Her ex-husband and several of his friends and several people that did not like Pamela stung Pamela Rogers. I now know why the 13-year old boys' family could not say anything about the case. I now know why the 19-year old boy had to say what he said about the case. I now know why Pamela had to take the Plea. I now know who the 8 men and one woman involved in the sting are. I now know what the connections between Pamela and these 8 individuals are. This complex case is very simple when you put the time into it to understand what was happening. The case was completely made up for humiliation of Pamela at the time her ex-husband was asking for a divorce. Nothing improper happened between her and the 13-year-old boy. The case became public on the 28.January.2005 and she was indicted on 04.February.2005. No investigator or Distract Attorney could have understood a case this complex in that short of time. I am completely sure I am correct about the case. There is no evidence for Pamela to be guilty; there is no circumstantial evidence for her being guilty. The study of this case shows a Pamela Joan Rogers that is so nice that everyone at Centertown School simple adore her. Dan Bass danba@usit.net

Posted by: Dan Bass at February 27, 2006 07:43 AM (I11kX)

3 IP seems to only post these types of stories. Quite frankly I would say that I think the most "harm" that has happened is to the reputations of the "victims" Imagine having to go thru your adolescence being constantly teased that you had told your mom that you were "molested" by the prettiest teacher in school. Every other kid in his class will be saying "Nice going *ssh*l* You ruined a good thing. If you didn't want it any more give her my number. Hook me up "

Posted by: john ryan at February 27, 2006 09:17 AM (TcoRJ)

4 Ummmm.... How can an attractive older woman "molest" a teenage boy, exactly? This is the stuff that adolescent fantasies are made of!

Posted by: docjim505 at February 27, 2006 09:58 AM (MC8cP)

5 You guys make it tough to take a side. On one hand, I agree with john ryan just from my own personal experiences with puberty. If it were my child, I would be on the warpath. But when I was 13, I spent many an afternoon or night in my treehouse with a pair of binoculars staring at the 20-something divorcee either in her shower (bedroom window was always open) or watching her getting a tan in the backyard. I would have loved for her to teach me a thing or two back then. I even used to go over and do things for her - like mow her yard, carry in groceries, etc. As an adult now, I suspect she knew I was her own personal peeping tom. I believe the open window was payment for the chores I did for her or she just liked to be watched. That was one pretty young lady and, if not at age 13, I'm sure my dad would not have been too upset by the time I was 15 to hear I was boning the single woman that every man on the street talked about. Of course, I was too young and stupid to even think about making an awkward move. Ironically, she was also an elementary school teacher. But Dan, it's hard for me to believe anyone would give up their career, reputation, and future unless she did more than what you say. Under most circumstances, a truly innocent person would fight like crazy for the sake of their own name. What you're saying is that she rolled over (no pun intended) due to a conspiracy. If the 13 y.o. were lying, a good lawyer would have had him on the witness stand and have him in tears confessing to the JFK assassination. I would only advocate putting a 13 year old through this IF I was sure he were lying, BTW, so we don't get into a mode of blaming the victim. I would demand to put the evidence on trial. If she really didn't do it, then what possible evidence could there be other than his word against her word unless he went straight to the police and had them break out a rape kit? That's why I find your story difficult to believe. I'm not saying it's not true because I'm not familiar with the case other than what I've heard on TV but if you can come across (again, no pun intended) with some hard information instead of vague statements, I'll give you a chance to win me over but our prisons are littered with people who are inside due to some grand conspiracy against them - their words, certainly not mine. What I see happening is a kid who gets lucky. He knows he's lucky and, like all 13 year old boys, brags about it to all his friends. Word gets around and one parent calls his parents and the story blows wide open. Again, I'm willing to read further if you can point me somewhere but it would have to be pretty convincing because any half-way decent lawyer and/or judge wouldn't allow all of the 'chatter' that has nothing to do with the case, to be presented. I'm also not naive enough to think that evidence can't be manufactured but you mention a lot of people involved and when there are that many, sooner or later, the perjury will start to get out. Give us more details.

Posted by: slug at February 27, 2006 11:42 AM (wcNc2)

6 By the way - just to clarify: I, in no way, condone predatory action by an adult onto a child. I'm just saying when I was 13 and having all these new things happening to me (think Joseph Gribble when he grew up over the summer), I would have clawed through 6 feet of granite to get the opportunity to get into my neighbor's pants.

Posted by: slug at February 27, 2006 01:32 PM (vQoK9)

7 What is it was a male teacher and male kid? Should a same-sex affair be seen as more or less predatory? Often times young gay kids dream about the older men in their lives.

Posted by: ColeWake at February 27, 2006 04:14 PM (xQltn)

8 This isn't about gay kids. It is about one really hot lady. Man, is she hot, or what?

Posted by: Leatherneck at February 27, 2006 06:12 PM (D2g/j)

9 The difference has a lot to do with the perception by the parent and the age of of the child and his awareness. A mentally retarded (or PC equivalent) 13 year old would never (hopefully) be acceptable to the parent or by society as a teacher's sexual partner. There have been lot of movies where the teen boy spends the whole two hours trying to get with the older woman. Most people don't seem to have a big problem with a 'normal' hormonal boy and an older woman. The line gets a lot fuzzier when it's the kid's teacher but, otherwise, they're considered normal feelings. Many fathers would just be relieved to find out their son isn't gay. Even most liberal parents don't want their son to be gay though they might tell you otherwise. It's kind of like the hypocritical anti-gun leftists who only think it should apply to everyone but themselves and their bodyguards. I'm not saying it's right or wrong. It just is. A normal, 13 year old heterosexual male trying to get laid isn't considered taboo. It's considered normal. How many of us men can honestly raise their hand and say they didn't want a chance to nail every teacher they had that was within reason when their hormones kicked in? To a 13 year old, any woman under 80 years old and 400 pounds is within reason. But at 13, a teenage boy is not likely to have come to accept any homosexual feelings he may have nor has it become acceptable for that type of relationship that NAMBLA is trying to make legal, much less a teacher and a student. Just my 2 cents.

Posted by: slug at February 27, 2006 08:04 PM (vQoK9)

10 Slug, you're 2 cents is worth a million. And it makes all the sense in the world.

Posted by: Oyster at February 28, 2006 10:29 AM (7YTVr)

11 Crap! "your" 2 cents ....

Posted by: Oyster at February 28, 2006 10:30 AM (7YTVr)

12 Pamela Joan Rogers 26. February.2006 Pamela Joan Rogers has now completed her jail time. In the 198 days she was in the Warren County Jail, I was able to befriend her and find out that she is a very sweet nice kindhearted person. This is exactly what people that know her have said about her from the beginning of this ordeal. I have studied the case for hundreds of hours and know that she is not guilty of anything. Ms Rogers was just too trusting and she let herself get involved in a sting. I have talked with her parents, I have talked with the young manÂ’s family, I have talked with teachers at Warren County High School were the young man is now a student, I have talked with teachers at Centertown School, and talked with people in general around Warren County and have figured out who was involved in the sting. I have received information that the young man has told several different people that there is nothing to this case. There is no question Â“Pamela Rogers is not guilty of anythingÂ”. Her plea was nodo contendere, which means that she said not guilty. Even the DA said it was no admitting of guilty. The boyÂ’s mother told me the last thing that Pamela told her when this mess started was that she would not do anything to hurt her son. So she went to jail to keep the boy from having to testify at a trial. The mother told me that Pamela did not do anything to be humiliated like she has been. She also told me her family had been treated like criminals and that the case had been handled very poorly. Remember we are talking about people that were very close friends although the District Attorney has forced them to stop talking now. One member of the boyÂ’s family told me that Pamela was like a sister or daughter and before this mess came up they all adored her. My analysis of the case is that the ex-husband was very close friends with a few people that were very close to the investigator for the District Attorney and the District Attorney himself and this group of men and one woman decided to sting Pamela Rogers because of the nasty divorce between her and her husband. Also the mother told me that the woman involved in the string most likely was PamelaÂ’s ex-husband lover. There was also an earlier major problem between the boyÂ’s family and several of the people involved in the sting according to the boyÂ’s mother, which reinforces ideas of a sting. So one can draw the conclusion that the sting was not only directed at Ms Rogers, but also at the boyÂ’s family and it all was for the purpose of humiliation and belittlement. An analyzation of the films made of the District Attorney more than shows that he was getting a very big high out of talking on National TV shows about this beautiful lady performing sexual related acts on this 13 year old boy. His performance on films made at the trial verifies this conclusion. With the closeness of the investigator for the District Attorney and the District Attorney to this group of people, one could most reasonably conclude that they all knew about what was to happen back in October 2004, when the ex-husband was trying to get Pamela connected with this boy. What the Pamela Joan Rogers case reduced to is that there was a group of men and one woman in McMinnville Tennessee that got the District Attorney to humiliate these two families and Ms Rogers had to take the Â“no contestÂ” plea to keep these friends of the District Attorney from putting her in prison for many years. This is just another example of the pit falls in our legal system and shows why we have the right to expect the people that enforce our laws to be of the highest moral and ethical character.

Posted by: Dan at February 28, 2006 02:02 PM (I11kX)

13 So, Dan, Pamela went to jail to avoid the boy having to testify in a sting operation conducted by her husband, her husband's lover, an investigator for the DA, the DA, and the boy. And the primary purpose was to humiliate two families? That's some conspiracy.

Posted by: Mike at February 28, 2006 03:38 PM (7JhpN)

14 No. Mike, the boy did not have anything to do with it. His family was also the Objective of the sting.

Posted by: Dan at March 02, 2006 08:26 PM (/yC9R)

15 Hey everbody, do you all like apples? I'm a male model, live in East Tennessee, not far from where Pam lives, 'bout 2 hours away. I've been writing her letters for the duration of her short prison sentance. Gotten to know her pretty good. Is she guilty as charged? Well, I never really gave a red rats ass, hey she's beautiful, intelligent and single. Thats all the reason I need to ask her out on a date. And she's actualy considering my offer. All the media and legal hype about her is just background noise to me. I don't know what the big fuss was all about she's just a woman for crying out loud. Everyone acts as tho' she fell from outer space. Whats up with that.Why was this thing with her case so blown out of proportion and hyped up way outta' control? Our society is so hungry for a new slant of sex gossip that they will trample all over themselves to get to it. Pathetic. I'm not concerned with trusting her.....I worry about you people, you know, the giant collective pervert known as the general public. If the American general public were one person, I wouldn't trust him alone with a one-eyed-purple-people-eater in a pink-polka-dot-bikini. So excuse the hell out of me if I see this woman in a nuetral light free from all the crazy opinions and charges railed against her. The bottom line is......I've gotten to know her pretty close, and she's about as respectful, kind, sincere and normal a woman as I've ever met. Beleive me, I've dated enough wacko women and sex crazed nut-bags to know one when I see one. Pam ain't it. So all you out there in hype land who thought they had a sleezy story to masterbate over.... Read it and weep. Looks like you'll have to turn your prurient attentions elswhere. Pam is now free, free to go and free from all you. How do you like them apples?

Posted by: Brian at April 04, 2006 08:01 PM (fkaXX)

16 Oh and for the record.....Dan is 100% correct.

Posted by: Brian at April 04, 2006 08:02 PM (fkaXX)

17 By the way Dan.....why you ignoring my Emails bro?Either that or you have one heck of a sensitive spam filter. I just wanted to ask if Pam is under some code of silence right now I haven't heard from her or her family and they don't return my calls anymore....everything ok? I realize she can't talk about her case but....she can still go out on a dates and see new friends right? Is there some personal restrictions being placed on her I wasn't informed of by her? Is she and her family paranoid? They never avoided me before. Man I haven't heard a peep out of her since her release and trust me....we are close. I became her new best friend, now for no apparent reason my attempts to contact her get no response. That ain't like her....at all....she'd never treat anyone like that, most of all me....so who is putting her up to this? Is she ok? You obviously are allowed contact with her presently....how's she holding up?

Posted by: Brian at April 04, 2006 08:20 PM (fkaXX)

18 I am French with a case in Detroit and travelling from France for this... I read this morning USA Today and I see the Pamela story, and I move on the WEB to know more about the story. This are clear Pamela are in love and abandonned and the messages or any in the web are not SEX messages but claims for love only I think about you think about me ! My wife are 19 years younger than me and the first days I said do not love me I am too old for you !! and now we are married from 12 years ago with two childrens... Love are nos pure SEX but sex follow the love. Poor Pam I hope US citizens can help you. Jean-Claude

Posted by: Jean-Claude at April 13, 2006 07:34 AM (7XQUQ)

19 Nevermind Dan....I got my answers from Pam....but thanks anyway...you mute, catatonic creep.The only time you broke your silence with me is when you discovered I did indeed have letters from Pam.....that was rude man. But thats ok....I know everything I need to know now. Go screw yourself.

Posted by: Brian at April 15, 2006 12:21 AM (aUgVW)

20 I would like to know how I could send this lady a letter with my condolances and an invitation to be with a guy her own age and give her a third chance at life. Anyone know how I could possibly get this done?

Posted by: Steve at May 02, 2006 04:06 PM (wZLWV)

21 All I gotta say is that this kid is lucky as hell! Have you seen the video of her dancin? I mean, c'mon! She's fine as heck, especially for a 30 year old. She was "Miss Nitro" too. I would not be traumatized by an "experience" with her, I guarantee that. Man... she can dance like a stripper. Wish she were my teacher...

Posted by: nate at May 06, 2006 04:33 PM (sVRWD)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Explosion At Israeli Arms Facility

An explosion has occurred near the entrance to an Israeli arms facility in Haifa, Israel:

INNÂ—Six persons were reportedly hurt in an explosion that occurred at a defense factory in Kiryat Bialik north of Haifa. The factory is run by the Rafael company, a leading producer of high-tech aeronautic equipment for the IDF.
Teams of rescue workers are arriving at the scene, including Magen David Adom ambulances. Rambam hospital in Haifa is preparing to treat the wounded.
The explosion occurred at the factoryÂ’s entrance. Police are checking whether the explosion was an accident or a terrorist strike.

Cross-posted at OpinionBug.com

Posted by: OpinionBug at 05:54 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 110 words, total size 1 kb.

The Freedom to Speak About Restricting the Freedom to Speak

The catch phrase now in the Cartoon War is "clash of civilizations". But in dealing with a "civilization", large numbers of whose members can be driven into frenzies of violence by taboo-violating cartoons, the real situation more closely resembles the Roman Empire under siege by barbarians.

Even Islam's intellectuals are infected with the false logic that springs from trying to reconcile seventh century mysticism with modern democratic freedoms. Dr Abdelwahab El-Affendi is a senior research fellow at University of Westminster in London. more...

Posted by: Bluto at 12:04 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 333 words, total size 2 kb.

February 26, 2006

Ow, That'll Leave A Mark

Thanks, Linda, for the smack upside the head.

Posted by: Vinnie at 11:19 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.

I'm A Reich Wing RethugliKKKan, So It Must Be True

You Are 82% Evil

You're the most evil person you know.

The devil is even a little scared of you!

How Evil Are You?

Well, I'm a tad more Reich Wing than I am RethugliKKKan, but you get the idea.

stein hoist: Teach

Posted by: Vinnie at 07:14 PM | Comments (13) | Add Comment
Post contains 63 words, total size 1 kb.

Open Thread: Olympic Sports You'd Like to See

In a previous post I rated the GAY, STRAIGHT, or METROSEXUAL aspects of selected Winter Olympic sports. Hilarity ensued, with the bonus that we were able to mortally offend a fullblown moonbat who shall remain nameless so as not to offend her life partner, Boris.

Commenter slug has requested an open thread for the sports we'd like to see introduced.

Please keep your posts at the customary PG-13 level. Unless they're really funny.

Posted by: Bluto at 05:29 PM | Comments (15) | Add Comment
Post contains 89 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I would like to see the Snowball Fight added as a sport. Team USA could hide rocks in them when they go up against the Iranian team.

Posted by: Vinnie at February 26, 2006 05:58 PM (f289O)

2 I want to see a real biathlon with shooters armed with 7.62mm NATO rifles hunting for caribou or elk. The team with the biggest rack wins the gold medal. And all the members of the male figure skating teams have to clean the animals shot by the biathlon teams. Now that I would like to see.

Posted by: jesusland joe at February 26, 2006 06:15 PM (rUyw4)

3 I'd like to see a sleding race like something out of Ben Hur, where the sledders need to "kill or be killed" as they travel at high speeds down a steep mountain slope. Athletes should be permitted to take as many drugs as needed. And there should be no rules, none. Last one standing gets the gold, and if there's anyone else alive, they can fight over the other two.

Posted by: Asgerd at February 26, 2006 06:20 PM (3/J8G)

4 1) One of my favorites is one my buddies and I do at the beach house twice a year: a)empty several cases of beer; b) toss cans out into the yard; c) load/shoot .22 rifle*; d) whoever hits the most in row wins. Competition continues until we run out of ammo, until it gets too dark, or until everyone passes out. * Our place is secluded so a BB gun will work in a more populated area. 2)It would be pretty cool to dress up a bunch of competitors in those sumo wrestling outfits and just watch them fall down. That never gets old. 3)Anything where guys get hit in the sack. 4)Anything that could produce the new 'Agony of Defeat' guy. Any or all of these would mean higher ratings for NBC. However, I would keep the womens's figure skating. The only reason that gets high ratings is that men like to watch nearly naked 18 year olds with their leg over their own shoulder. NBC: call me.

Posted by: slug at February 26, 2006 06:29 PM (vQoK9)

5 I'd like to see "Polar Bear Cub Snatch". In this event the athletes (unarmed of course) must steal a cub while in the presence of its mother and carry it by hand over the finish line, 500 metres away. Points are awarded for the weight of the cub taken and the time taken to cross the finish line.

Posted by: Graeme at February 26, 2006 06:30 PM (RkR7z)

6 I'd like to see a more violent version of Ultimate Fighting Championship. No rules, in a cage till one man is completely unconcious. It would have clear winner, unlike the judged sports. The sport could also be used to solve international conflicts.

Posted by: Moose at February 26, 2006 06:37 PM (3btGz)

7 Moose, is this to be an outside or inside sport, because it would be much better if it were outside, in the snow, on top of a mountain. The term, "agony of defeat" would take on a new meaning.

Posted by: jesusland joe at February 26, 2006 06:42 PM (rUyw4)

8 It would absolutely be outside, winter olympics, on top of a mountian. No medics either for the loser.

Posted by: Moose at February 26, 2006 07:28 PM (3btGz)

9 Combined figure skating and curling event. Skater must cross in front of the stone several times.

Posted by: Marvin at February 26, 2006 08:21 PM (zktVb)

10 Ultimate Biathalon: instead of taking shots at targets, the various teams try to 'tag' each other. Snowboard Archery Catch: Snowboarders will attempt to catch arrow fired by expert archers while in the middle of elaborate jumps. Most arrows caught and still alive wins. Bobsled Chicken: Bobsleds are released at opposite sides of a very steep track and head right for each other at breakneck speeds. If one team hits the 'chicken switch' and bails, the other teams wins. In case of collision and death, it's a tie.

Posted by: Remulak MoxArgon at February 26, 2006 08:32 PM (/kHgK)

11 Downhill Speedskating. A very steep hill covered in ice, and speedskaters race down it while curling rocks are dropped behind them.

Posted by: Moose at February 26, 2006 09:49 PM (3btGz)

12 I'm late to the discussion - damn - but better late than never - I have a very important..personal...question: curling...gay,straight, or metro?

Posted by: Heroic Dreamer at February 27, 2006 12:16 AM (aH6Zf)

13 My money's on Graeme's with one more twist. TBCUR.

Posted by: forest hunter at February 27, 2006 03:00 AM (Fq6zR)

14 Heroic Dreamer: curling is probably a symbolic fertilization ritual. The "stones" represent spermatozoons competing to be first to inseminate the "target", or egg. Thus, curling is categorized as STRAIGHT, but also as LAME.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at February 27, 2006 09:31 AM (RHG+K)

15 DPB: : ) This is me laughing at your funny joke. ..O( : \)> This is Mo (PBUH) puzzled because his head might detonate.

Posted by: Heroic Dreamer at February 27, 2006 05:28 PM (aH6Zf)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

ACLU Sponsors Anti-NSA Granny Moonbat Exhibition

From The Oakland Tribune:

The vigil, sponsored by the ACLU, Code Pink, and the Raging Grannies of San Francisco, featured speakers from various organizations, private citizen testimonies, and the activist flock singing classic tunes with supplanted lyrics for their cause and waving flashlights and electric candles to Â“shed the light on secrecy."

We should encourage the ACLU to sponsor more of these events. Not only does it help get word out to the public that the ACLU has become a radical, subversive organization bent on sabotaging US efforts in the War on Terror, but the pictures show normal Americans how deranged and uncouth the idiots who march in these things are.

Via Stop the ACLU.

Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.

Posted by: Bluto at 05:19 PM | Comments (13) | Add Comment
Post contains 138 words, total size 1 kb.

Ugh

Bad idea for a caption contest.

Sorry.

Posted by: Vinnie at 11:27 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 9 words, total size 1 kb.

British Judge Okays Baby's Death Over Parent's Objections

From the Telegraph:

The parents of Charlotte Wyatt have been told that doctors are to be allowed to let their profoundly ill baby daughter die if they feel it is in her best interests.
A High Court judge yesterday lifted a previous ruling that she should always be resuscitated, on the grounds that the two-year-old was now on a "downward rather than an upward trend".
Mr Justice Hedley heard an emergency application from doctors treating her that she had developed an aggressive chest infection and was unlikely to survive any moves to keep her alive.

This is happening in the UK, but how far down this slope has America slipped?

Via Stop the ACLU and Michelle Malkin.

Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.

Posted by: Bluto at 12:07 AM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 143 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Abominable. Why don't they simply instruct the doctors to slit the baby's throat instead of withholding life support? Oh yeah, I almost forgot, because that would make it too obvious what they're doing.

Posted by: reverse_vampyr at February 26, 2006 02:24 AM (r6z8D)

2 Sounds too me that these 'Doktors' trained at the 'Josef Mengele Mercy Hospital'. They should haveb re-studied the Hippocratic oath, before deciding that both they and the Judge can decide too assume the title of God. The 'Doktors' in this case, shouldn't be employed at a Hospital but at a slaughterhouse, there they can engage in butchering for a just cause and at the same time satisfy their bloodlust. The judge can be compared with the Nazi Judges of the past, they too decided that the 'inferior' human specimen's should be butchered, until of course, the just put an end to their crimes against humanity.

Posted by: Ken at February 26, 2006 02:25 PM (CYeOT)

3 The judge should be sent to the TOWER OF LONDON and beheaded

Posted by: sandpiper at February 26, 2006 02:36 PM (1mdPR)

4 Too bad the baby wasn't Muslim, the judge would never had made such a decision, unless of course sharia allowed it, which it doesn't. Disgusting. I wonder if it is too late for a Muslim conversion, or should I say reversion?

Posted by: jesusland joe at February 26, 2006 03:28 PM (rUyw4)

5 How can the US Taliban (PNAC Xians) exploit the private misery of families dealing with the death of their loved ones in this way? Just as they exploited the Terri Schiavo case, and were found to be 100% wrong on all counts, so shall they very likely be found to be completely wrong about this. These Xian pseudochristians stop at nothing! There is no fact they will not distort, nothing sacred they will not misuse (like the name Jesus), in their effort to come out on top by way of divide and conquer. One need only notice their unflinching support for war and state executions, to put this clear case of heartless media exploitation into perspective.

Posted by: Natasha at February 26, 2006 05:13 PM (i6py+)

6 The family wants the world to know that their child is being put to death against their wishes, Natasha.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at February 26, 2006 09:28 PM (RHG+K)

7 Now it delares that docotrs and not parents have the say so about wheather a child lves or dies what a bunch of barbarians

Posted by: sandpiper at February 27, 2006 09:35 AM (AlCYT)

8 "The family wants the world to know that their child is being put to death against their wishes, Natasha." If the media reports of this can be trusted (my media skepticism is showing) then of course I am 100% against that. Given that GB is a semi socialist police state. I am inclined to believe the story. Of course Blair's GB, the greatest Bush NWO ally, only shows the way we are headed also, and I for one do not look forward to that. I wish the parents well and that their baby lives. I further wish to see the heartless medical deities (Md's) involved being thrown in jail and banned from practicing medicine. That's just me though.

Posted by: Natasha at February 28, 2006 01:46 PM (i6py+)

9 I also think the Judge should be both forced to resign and forced to pay damages to the parents he has so traumatized.

Posted by: Natasha at February 28, 2006 01:48 PM (i6py+)

10 I,ll bet that if this involved a rabid dog or wild critter that just killed someone the jerks at PETA would be over there protesting with PAMELA ANDERSON and a few dozen other hollywood celebery morons

Posted by: sandpiper at February 28, 2006 02:20 PM (162Hn)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

February 25, 2006

RIP: America's Deputy - Don Knotts Dies At 81

From the LA Times:

Don Knotts, the saucer-eyed, scarecrow-thin comic actor best known for his roles as the high-strung small-town deputy Barney Fife on the 1960s CBS series "The Andy Griffith Show" and the leisure-suit-clad landlord Ralph Furley on ABC's '70s sitcom "Three's Company," has died. He was 81.
Knotts, who lived in West Los Angeles, died Friday night of lung cancer at a Los Angeles hospital, according to Sherwin Bash, his longtime manager.

When I was a kid our TV got only two stations. One of them carried The Andy Griffith Show. The world will be a less interesting place without Deputy Barney Fife.

Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto .

UPDATE: Related from Danny Carleton.

Posted by: Bluto at 06:53 PM | Comments (17) | Add Comment
Post contains 135 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Truly one of the honest to God good guys.

Posted by: dick at February 25, 2006 07:53 PM (3UKWo)

2 I suppose I have watched every black and white Andy Griffith episode at least 100 times, yet I never tire of the back and forth banter between Andy and Barney during those times they were together at the jail. I have laughed and laughed thousands of times. What a great show! Don, rest in peace, knowing that you have made so many people happy and blessed so many with the great gift of laughter. Go with God, Don!

Posted by: jesusland joe at February 25, 2006 08:04 PM (rUyw4)

3 Yep.. the Andy Griffith Show was like an oasis for me. And Don Knotts was awesome. They had some real strange characters in Mayberry. One of my favorites was Floyd, the barber. Gawd he was strange. We used to call him Pink Floyd. But Don Knotts was the greatest and I'll never forget him.

Posted by: Richard at February 25, 2006 08:37 PM (7KF8r)

4 I was in a really good mood until I read about Mr Knotts passing. The Andy Griffith Show was THE funniest show ever (OK, so was Seinfeld...)

Posted by: tele64 at February 25, 2006 09:25 PM (pSM02)

5 Truly a sad day. I really loved Don Knotts. I watched The Andy Griffith Show when I was in elementary school. (I am over 50 now!) -- gunjam

Posted by: gunjam at February 25, 2006 11:23 PM (v3tHm)

6 For about the past year or so I've been watching the reruns daily on TV Land. He was the perfect Barney. I thought I was a little wierd not getting tired of the show's character humor and wholesome entertainment. Not now tho. I didn't even know Knotts was still alive, I can't remember anything about him after Three's Company.

Posted by: Javapuke at February 25, 2006 11:39 PM (36MDi)

7 gunjam; Do you remember Gomer and Barney playing off one another?

Posted by: forest hunter at February 26, 2006 02:47 AM (Fq6zR)

8 RIP Barney! I have sets for your reminiscing. http://fadfocus.com/barney.html Share the memories... Thank you!

Posted by: Otis at February 26, 2006 02:58 AM (jc1d6)

9 We've just recently lost four 60's comedy icons. (Don Adams from "Get Smart," Bob Denver from "Giligan's Island," Al Lewis from "The Munsters," and Now Don Knotts.) Very sad.

Posted by: youngbourbonprofessional at February 26, 2006 06:35 AM (tdhAh)

10 Bummer: My dad too me to Apple Dumpling Gang. If Andy's on, I'm watching it. They don't make em like that anymore. Plus I'm in love with Thelma Lou too.

Posted by: Howie at February 26, 2006 09:16 AM (D3+20)

11 Sad, but think of this......... Barn will still be chasing Earnest T. Bass (Howard Morris) up there. Earnest T. must have a plethora of glass panes to throw rocks at.

Posted by: jesse fan in chapel hill at February 26, 2006 12:29 PM (TPwEw)

12 I personally will miss America's Favorite Deputy. He made us laugh with his antics, but his heart was always in the right place.

Posted by: Tom at February 26, 2006 12:48 PM (vWF9N)

13 THE GHOST AND MR CHICKEN,THE RELUCTANT ASTRONUAT,THE SHAKEIST GUN IN THE WEST,THE INCREDIBLE MR LIMPET,THE APPLE DUMPLING GANG, THE PRIVATE EYES,CHICKEN LITTLE,HOT LEAD AND COLD FEET, thats some of his movies and BARNEY FIFE RIP

Posted by: sandpiper at February 26, 2006 02:40 PM (1mdPR)

14 Damn! Now the Night Stalker (Darren McGavin) has joined the ranks of TV heroes of yesteryear!

Posted by: youngbourbonprofessional at February 26, 2006 03:48 PM (tdhAh)

15 BARNEY WAS THE EPITOME OF HUMANITY. THERE IS JUST NO WAY TO DESCRIBE THE WONDERFUL FEELING I EXPERIENCED WHILE WATCHING THE ANDY GRIFFITH SHOW. IT WAS SOFT RAIN AND MELLOW SUNSHINE, IT WAS YOUTHFUL DAYS AT PLAY, IT WAS HOME AND PARENTS AND EVERYTHING WONDERFUL. MOST OF ALL, IT WAS BARNEY, I WOULD LOVED TO HAVE LIVED IN MAYBERRY AND BEEN AQUAINTED WITH ALL THE CHARACTERS. GO WITH GOD, DON KNOTTS.

Posted by: Joanna at March 03, 2006 11:20 PM (Ffvoi)

16 Dear Don Knotts, Thank you for the many memories. Thank you for being you! We will all miss you dearly; however, you live through the Andy Griffith show. Always remember that you and Andy will always be the model of my life, and more importantly, my idols. We will all see you on the other side my friend....and do look forward to that day!!! Don Knotts - July 1924 to February 2006

Posted by: Greg Andress at March 04, 2006 07:57 AM (XCriA)

17 Thanks for always making me laugh no matter how my day is going!! We lost a true angel when Don Knotts died and like my father that posted the comment above we will see you on the other side! Yvette Gorman

Posted by: Yvette Gorman at March 05, 2006 01:02 AM (Ffvoi)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

I'll Never Look At Her The Same

Sitting here wondering why my 4 year old daughter stubbornly refuses to pick up in her room when my 8 year old son has done it happily since he was 2.

Then it hit me.

ZIONIST CONSPIRATORS HAVE GOTTEN TO MY DAUGHTER!!!

AUGHHH!

Damn you Tom and Jerry, damn you all to Hell!

Posted by: Vinnie at 05:54 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 67 words, total size 1 kb.

Isolated Incident #4332

Start with Michelle Malkin and go from there.

Nuttin' to see here, folks. Move along, please.

Posted by: Vinnie at 03:48 PM | Comments (11) | Add Comment
Post contains 22 words, total size 1 kb.

ToonTown Riots Over Iranian Remarks

***Breaking News, Must Cite Jawa Report***

Violent demonstrations have erupted in ToonTown over incorrect remarks made about the revered 'toons Tom and Jerry (PBUT) by an Iranian professor.

Luckily, no 'toons have been killed or injured as of yet, due to the remarkable ability of these creatures to regenerate themselves.

Rumors are circulating that half-human, half 'toon The Mask is mobilizing a group of heavily armed 'toons to tunnel their way into Tehran and exact revenge, with close air support provided by Marvin the Martian and Duck Dodgers.

A source close to the action told me "Being called a Zionist plot is a badge of honor, that's not the problem. But when they associate the great Tom and Jerry with the lame ass studio that gave us pap like The Little Mermaid, it's time for war."

We'll keep you updated as events warrant.

Update: Bikini Bottom has joined in the uproar. In a misguided attempt at anti-toon defiance, the Tehran Times published the following caricature of the Prophet Squarepants (PBUH).

Warning: Graphic image below more...

Posted by: Vinnie at 01:23 PM | Comments (12) | Add Comment
Post contains 223 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Holy smokes! They didn't.. oh no.. not tom and jerry! LMAO.. hillarious keep it up love g

Posted by: girish at February 25, 2006 01:51 PM (IpuE8)

2 TOM AND JERRY are in hiding and wheres ROGER and JESSICA RABBIT? and what about BENNY THE CAB and BABY HERMAN are they in dire danger?

Posted by: sandpiper at February 25, 2006 02:10 PM (AQZCQ)

3 This afternoon I was doing some wood work. After sawing a plank I noticed that I had a small cut on my finger. Then it dawned on me - the Jews made the Ark of the Covenant out of wood! I had just falling victim to a Zionist plot whereby all of the world's timber was specially treated to have splinters which would cause immeasurable pain, suffering and even bleeding, thus requiring treatment from Jewish doctors at the hospital. It's all a Zionist scheme to subjugate the world and control its money!

Posted by: Graeme at February 25, 2006 04:50 PM (sZ5tQ)

4 You realize that you're going to straight to Hell for blaspheming Spongebob, don't you?

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at February 25, 2006 06:25 PM (RHG+K)

5 My eyes. The goggles do nothing!

Posted by: Robert Savage at February 25, 2006 06:40 PM (CnDtU)

6 Ithink people aare reading more into toons than is really there. Remember the gay teletubbies and gay Patrick and SpongeBob Squarepants. These religously intolerant of Christianity and Islam are actually quite similar.

Posted by: john ryan at February 25, 2006 09:26 PM (TcoRJ)

7 Yes, John I was thinking the same thing when I read about Christians burning down PBS's office, and holding up signs threatening to behead the producer. Oh wait. that didn't happen.

Posted by: dave at February 25, 2006 09:55 PM (CcXvt)

8 The Toons are handicapped by the fact that the traitor Bert has already turned over most of their classified information to the Other Side.

Posted by: Joseph Hertzlinger at February 25, 2006 10:27 PM (HEEUr)

9 John Ryan: "quite similar?" Hmmm. By your logic, may I also say that Satanism and Christianity are quite similar? Both believe in the supernatural, both honor invisible beings, and both have worship services.

Posted by: gunjam at February 25, 2006 11:29 PM (v3tHm)

10 I like pie. Sometimes, I choose pudding.

Posted by: Vinnie at February 26, 2006 12:10 AM (f289O)

11 GI Joe is mobilizing for an invations as we speak.. Cobra is on the back burner and Islam is be saying, 'Now we Know' soon

Posted by: The Other Dave at February 26, 2006 02:03 PM (aynOR)

12 BUGS BUNNY,DAFFY DUCK and ELMER FUDD are now under goverment protection THE TRANSFORMERS and getting ready to ROLL OUT and POKEMON are hiding

Posted by: sandpiper at February 26, 2006 02:46 PM (1mdPR)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

167kb generated in CPU 0.043, elapsed 0.1833 seconds.
134 queries taking 0.1554 seconds, 485 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.

Search Thingy

Monthly Traffic

Pages: 3127
Files: 29
Bytes: 78.4M
CPU Time: 4:14
Queries: 357633

Content

Posts: 5690
Comments: 76633

Feeds

February 27, 2006

February 26, 2006

February 25, 2006

Search Thingy

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Blogroll

Monthly Traffic

Content

Feeds