An appeals court in Sweden has cut the sentence of two Ansar al-Islam terrorists. Apparently Seven years is too harsh in Sweden for financing murder in Iraq. Meanwhile, an offshoot of Ansar al-Islam is practicing for jihad in Sweden where it claims to have found 'safe-haven'.

Swedish Radio International:

The two have been found guilty of collecting and transferring more than 148,000 US dollars to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who leads al-QaidaÂ’s operations in Iraq, the Ansar al-Islam group, and other suspected terrorists in Iraq. They were linked to the December 2003 suicide bombing in Arbil, which took 4 lives.

They were sentenced by a lower court to 6 and 7 years imprisonment respectively, but the Stockholm Appeals Court changed the sentences to 4 and a half and 5 years, with permanent bans from entering Sweden after they are released.

Posted by: Rusty at 02:30 PM | Comments (12) | Add Comment
Post contains 226 words, total size 2 kb.

Over the weekend, al Qaeda made a bogus claim that it was holding two Marines hostage in Iraq, and later that the two had been executed. While such fictional claims are nothing new from al Qaeda, it serves as a reminder that several American civilians reamain in captivity.

We've been getting a number of hits about Dean Sadek today (thanks to Tim at Opinion Bug for the tip). Hopefully there is some impending good news that has not yet hit the MSM yet.

Mohammad Radeen Sadeq (better known by his Americanized name 'Dean Sadek') was working at the Baghdad airport as a civillian contractor when he was abducted from his home. It's not clear the exact date he was abducted, but al Jazeera showed a videotape released by the terrorist 1920 Brigades organization showing Sadek on Nov. 11th.

Dean Sadek was born in Lebanon but was a naturalized U.S. citizen who lived in the Charlotte, N.C. area. Dean Sadek's ex-sister-in-law left this comment saying Dean:

is a kind, giving individual who loves his two sons dearly. I'm hoping by he being of Lebanese descent that it would be in his favor. ...Why is he there? He is there to help the good people... If he loses his life he would be one more of the heroes to win freedom for others. I am totally devasted everyday not knowing what will happen to him besides his immediate family and children. My prayers are with him and the others daily fighting for freedom of others.

Posted by: Rusty at 01:37 PM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 275 words, total size 2 kb.

New RINO sightings is up itÂ’s unearthly strange.

No more little piggie stress relievers. Gees give me a break. I hereby vow to eat left over pork chops at lunch every day for the duration of Ramadan.

Hat Tip: Big thanks to Mike at Mr. Muffler for getting Howie back on the road again for cheap.

In other strange and paranormal news Howie gets a beyond the Grave visit and interview with Ben Franklin. Actually IÂ’ve been worried about buying propane and propane related accessories this year. Mainly the fuel, I mean IÂ’m sitting on bone dry empty and winter is coming on. I entered the FS(thatÂ’s farm service city slicker) drawing for 100 bucks worth of free propane. Turns out I won. I mean I freaking won is that weird or not. Even stranger than that, Mr. FranklinÂ’s ghost delivered the C note to my door. Below is a record of our exchange.

Updated: Ok no comment? Well let's try this. Scott Baio was on Arrested Development tonight as Lawyer Bob Loblaw. His lawfirm speicalizing in cool stuff like Fraud, Tax Evasion, money laundering. Hope you saw, it was good stuff.

Nipsey Russell has died Hat Tip: The Filthy One

Typhoone Longwang has struck China and 59 soldiers are missing. Aside from the name of the storm, not funny.

more...

Posted by: Howie at 01:36 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 483 words, total size 4 kb.

To Dave Gullyborg at Resistance is Futile! Once you're past the first year, it's all down hill man......

Posted by: Rusty at 12:40 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 22 words, total size 1 kb.

Connecticut sets itself square into the middle of one of the stickiest battles our country has ever faced by granting Civil Unions to homosexual couples.

The whole time that this has been a fight, I have felt that it is wrong, but wasn't sture why. Now I think I've figured it out, at least for me. Procreation. Heterosexual relationships are the only relationships that offer the ability to procreate and continue the survival of the human species. That's not to say that every human couple is able to procreate, but there is at least an underlying reason for the attraction. Other forms of sexual perversion don't even have this to fall back on.

Now, with that being said, if a state wishes to recognize two people, regardless of gender and cohabitating as a couple for all legal purposes such as medical treatment, living wills, etc. Then so be it. But you better be careful when you word the statute because you could be leaving the door open for your state to provide a civil union between he and his sixteen wives. Or a man and his dog. Think it won't happen? It's already happening in some of the same-sex marriage states. A woman is sueing the state to get a marriage license issued between her and her dog. All I'm saying is that if you want to grant special priviliges to one sexual deviation while leaving others out, you had better be prepared for the firestorm that will percipitate.

Posted by: Drew at 05:28 AM | Comments (54) | Add Comment
Post contains 257 words, total size 2 kb.

The Bush administration has, overall, done a fine job of foreign policy. Controlling proliferation, destabilizing and toppling terror sponsors, sowing the seeds of democracy.

But when it comes time to write the retrospectives, one glaring error will mar his legacy: Bush has ignored Latin America. For our first Spanish-speaking president it's a strange omission, though he's certainly had justifiable demands that took his attention elsewhere.

The next president will have to face down a creeping anti-Americanism that is advancing through the Latin world, led by Venezuela's Hugo Chavez in collusion with Castro from Cuba. His minions have already successfully brought down two governments in Bolivia and he is establishing a television network to consolidate his influence across the continent. Brazil's Lula has mellowed a bit but he's still redder than a parboiled lobster. The Communists are winning.

Today the Washington Post brings word that Chavez is undermining the democratic government of Nicaragua as well. And Chavez' gimp there is a blast from the past--America's old friend, the man whom Reagan nearly blew his whole presidency trying to bring down, the big Sandinista, Daniel Ortega. Of course, depending on the next president, that might be just fine and dandy:

Bush governs in interesting times, and his first responsibility remains the war on Terror. But he needs an affirmative policy for Latin America that begins the rollback of Chavez. We can't let this problem metastasize anymore. What will it profit us if we clean out the madrassas and terror dens of the middle east only to face a hostile continent unified against us to the south?

Posted by: seedubya at 01:16 AM | Comments (9) | Add Comment
Post contains 270 words, total size 2 kb.

(Lake George, New York) Dozens of senior citizens were onboard a 40-foot Shoreline Cruises tour boat when it flipped over on Lake George, about 50 miles north of Albany. The weather was clear, with the temperature in the 70s. Eyewitnesses say the glass-enclosed boat sank.

From PostStar.com:

Nineteen people were killed in a tour boat accident on Lake George today, according to Warren County Sheriff Larry Cleveland.

The Ethan Allen, a small cruise boat on the lake, was carrying 47 passengers this afternoon when the accident happened about 3 p.m. today.

According to Cleveland, the wake from the Mohican, a boat owned by Lake George Steamboat Company, swamped and flipped the glass-enclosed Ethan Allen.

[Update 2030EDT]

Twenty-one people are now listed as having died when the Ethan Allen sank in approximately 70 feet of water. The only crew member onboard, Captain Richard Paris, survived. The estimated number of passengers was increased to 49 and it's reported that none pulled from the water were wearing life vests. Also, since those onboard were senior citizens, a number were in wheelchairs or required walkers.

The incident occurred about 200 yards from shore. An unconfirmed report states that it capsized after it hit the wake of a larger cruise boat. In my opinion, before this tragedy is history, some serious liability will be assigned for negligence or malfeasance.

Companion at Interested-Participant.

Posted by: Mike Pechar at 05:00 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 263 words, total size 2 kb.

Leave a comment and show your support for this young lady's family.

Nothing about her sacrifice on our behalf overshadows those others who have given their lives for freedom, but a friend asked, and I answered. We honor them all here.

"But I suppose it's often that way. The brave things in the old tales and songs, Mr. Frodo: adventures, as I used to call them. I used to think that they were things the wonderful folk of the stories went out and looked for, because they wanted them, because they were exciting and life was a bit dull, a kind of a sport, as you might say. But that's not the way of it with the tales that really mattered, or the ones that stay in the mind. Folk seem to have been just landed in them, usually - their paths were laid that way, as you put it. But I expect they had lots of chances, like us, of turning back, only they didn't. And if they had, we shouldn't know, because they'd have been forgotten. We hear about those as just went on - and not all to a good end, mind you; at least not to what folk inside a story and not outside it call a good end."

Posted by: Vinnie at 09:20 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 219 words, total size 1 kb.

(Jakarta, Indonesia) Near-simultaneous bomb blasts ripped through popular tourist areas of Kuta and Jimbaran Beach on the Indonesian island of Bali on Saturday killing at least 23 persons and wounding at least 35 foreign tourists. Details remain sketchy.

Two explosions hit beachside area seafood restaurants at dinner time and minutes later an explosion struck a popular shopping area, Matahan Square.

Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono strongly condemned the bombings in a televised address: "These are clearly terrorist attacks because the targets were random and public places."

[Update 1500 EDT]

Xinhua now reports that at 30 people are dead. In another report, the blasts are being blamed on the fuel oil price hikes of an average of 126 percent instituted Saturday. Professor Budiatna of the University of Indonesia observed that opposition groups no longer demonstrate because the government ignores them.

"They pressured (the government) by resorting to terrors. Their message is to lower the fuel oil price or else the terror acts will continue," the observer added.

[Update 1545 EDT]

The BBC reports that over 100 are wounded.

From Aljazeera.com:

A government spokesman, Dino Djalal, said up to six bombs exploded at different locations.

Local media said police discovered a number of unexploded devices.

Companion at Interested-Participant.

Posted by: Mike Pechar at 01:19 PM | Comments (15) | Add Comment
Post contains 268 words, total size 3 kb.

Bill Bennet has apparently ruffled a lot of feathers recently by making the point that aborting all the black pregnancies in the land would reduce the crime rate. And the PC brigades are out in force attempting to cash in a little anti-conservative treasure. None of this is very encouraging, because everyone is thinking in terms of a broad fallacy. No one is bothering to make sense. Bennet obviously thought he was making a clear empirical point, using it to bolster a case that there are lots of things one could do to reduce the crime rate that would be more objectionable than simply putting up with crime. This was, in fact, one of the more subtle points of Seymour Martin Lipset's classic: American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword. Lipset's point being that it's our unwillingness to give automatic deference to authority that partly explains higher historical crime rates in the US, at least until Europe began to pass us in the robbery, burglary and home invasion category. And that if we changed that basic relationship to authority, the whole tapestry of our civilization could come unravelled... Compared to that, a high crime rate is a small price to pay.
more...

Posted by: Demosophist at 12:47 AM | Comments (28) | Add Comment
Post contains 947 words, total size 6 kb.

1 Now that is exactly the kind of dialog his statement should have created. A common sense refutation by a non-reactionary. Instead we got gasps and outrage.

Posted by: Oyster at October 01, 2005 05:39 AM (YudAC)

2 Bennett's remark was an abstraction, and a reductio ad absurdum, much like Jonathan Swift's "Modest Proposal" for curing the famine in Ireland. Nancy Pelosi and Jesse Jackson may not be mental giants, but one has to believe they understand this--and choose, nevertheless, to use Bennett vilely to whip up their more-ignorant followers. It's typical of the kind of smear Democrats use against Republicans, and the liberal media uses against Republicans, shamelessly betraying their own total lack of ethics. In this case the underlying charge is doubly absurd, inasmuch as Bennett, despite many enormous changes from Democrat to Republican, academic to Reagan or Bush cabinet officer, and think-tank moralist to talk show host, has always and consistently maintained his vehement opposition to all abortion everywhere, in accord with the devout Catholic faith which everyone knows him to practice.

Posted by: Exguru at October 01, 2005 08:31 AM (M7kiy)

3 ". And the PC brigades are out in force attempting to cash in a little anti-conservative treasure. " Even dubya cashed in on the action. See? he does care about black people.

Posted by: actus at October 01, 2005 08:56 AM (Zi15r)

4 these comments and those by bennet don't "add" up. when one looks at raw numbers of crimes in U.S. and 'race' of those persons, you find the results don't point toward african american.

Posted by: richard at October 01, 2005 08:57 AM (53R3n)

5 Bennett's remark was an abstraction, and a reductio ad absurdum, much like Jonathan Swift's "Modest Proposal" for curing the famine in Ireland. Well yes, in terms of the spirit of the remark; which is why it wasn't "racist." But the relationship between humans and nutrition is largely fixed, while the relationship between blacks and crime isn't. It's his assumption that it is fixed that's fallacious.

Posted by: Demosophist at October 01, 2005 10:53 AM (QvodM)

6 Richard: I don't think he was looking at "raw" numbers. I think it was "disproportionate" numbers of black to white. I thought Demosophist's response was pretty spot on.

Posted by: Oyster at October 01, 2005 10:56 AM (YudAC)

7 You kill off any subset of the population and crime will reduce. What Mr. Bennett tried to do was to take the argument that abortion has reduced the crime rate to an absurd place on the field. I do not think it is completely unfair to attack the argument the way it is either. I think even dunderheads like Jesse Jackson can figure out what the whole meaning of Bennett's comments were about. What is being attacked is the assumption that black==criminal, which is separate from the abortion aspect of Bennett's comments. In the end we file this along with the case of Bill Cosby. Blacks may be able to use the N word but they can not offer thoughtful and substantial criticism either.

Posted by: Marcus Aurelius at October 01, 2005 11:15 AM (hTZG+)

8 In the same manner, racism can be reduced in america by aborting all white children.

Posted by: customer at October 01, 2005 11:35 AM (J/bfB)

9 customer - genius comment!

Posted by: I spit on your grave at October 01, 2005 12:07 PM (BmtfW)

10 Just read what he said. No one should be defending this racist. CALLER: I noticed the national media, you know, they talk a lot about the loss of revenue, or the inability of the government to fund Social Security, and I was curious, and I've read articles in recent months here, that the abortions that have happened since Roe v. Wade, the lost revenue from the people who have been aborted in the last 30-something years, could fund Social Security as we know it today. And the media just doesn't -- never touches this at all. BENNETT: Assuming they're all productive citizens? CALLER: Assuming that they are. Even if only a portion of them were, it would be an enormous amount of revenue. BENNETT: Maybe, maybe, but we don't know what the costs would be, too. I think as -- abortion disproportionately occur among single women? No. CALLER: I don't know the exact statistics, but quite a bit are, yeah. BENNETT: All right, well, I mean, I just don't know. I would not argue for the pro-life position based on this, because you don't know. I mean, it cuts both -- you know, one of the arguments in this book Freakonomics that they make is that the declining crime rate, you know, they deal with this hypothesis, that one of the reasons crime is down is that abortion is up. Well -- CALLER: Well, I don't think that statistic is accurate. BENNETT: Well, I don't think it is either, I don't think it is either, because first of all, there is just too much that you don't know. But I do know that it's true that if you wanted to reduce crime, you could -- if that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down. That would be an impossible, ridiculous, and morally reprehensible thing to do, but your crime rate would go down. So these far-out, these far-reaching, extensive extrapolations are, I think, tricky.

Posted by: I spit on your grave at October 01, 2005 12:47 PM (BmtfW)

11 I always thought putting drops of liquid acid on ATM bank deposit envelopes would help society get along. But then again, I've witnessed racism more in the mind than in action. Being white, it's always touchy trying to talk about race with someone who isn't white. It's almost like there's some sort of PC code where you're supposed to agree that whitey is the worst, etc. I don't buy that shit. It's like you're racist if you have a different opinion! For instance, I think that blacks bring racism on themselves in different ways, like kids thinking it's sly to be a menace, or people who use race as an excuse or crutch. The worst being the whole "Your ancestors enslaved my ancestors, so now I'm going to be a dick to you" thing. Depending on who's version of history you're believing in, it's obvious: Hate only breeds more hate. If Bennett is a racist, I wouldn't be surprised. He is guilty of saying stupid shit, but it's not like it hasn't been said before. Just recently the NYtimes had a pro-author review about a book called "Freakonomics" which had similar views about abortion and ghetto crime. Anyway, I'm going on tangents. We all know Kanye was wrong...Bush hates POOR people.

Posted by: osamabinhiding at October 01, 2005 12:53 PM (QMrot)

12 In the same manner, racism can be reduced in america by aborting all white children. Hmm... That implies that whites are more racist than blacks, which isn't something I'd concede. My hunch is that there's no difference between the races on that score, so the rate of racism probably wouldn't change at all. Of course there are those who define racism exclusively as an attitude of the dominant group, but that's easily seen through. I'm even skeptical that racism would be reduced if we got rid of all but one "race," because the term isn't really scientific so Hutu and Tutsi, Arab and Jew, see one another as racially distinct when the fact is otherwise. Race is in the eye of the beholder. But it was a brain-teasing comment, that's for sure.

Posted by: Demosophist at October 01, 2005 02:47 PM (egnHl)

13 A couple of things. It is clear what he is arguing and people want to focus on one tree from a whole forest. Some years ago Rush got into trouble by saying something very similar. He said if a test came out where parents could tell if their unborn children had homosexual tendencies then a whole segment of the population would come out against abortion. This was taken to mean Rush favored the aborting of unbron gay children. Of course it isn't true. What Bill Bennett is saying that utilitarian arguments for or against abortion end up in abusrdity. Why isn't Margaret Sanger villified in a similar fashion?

Posted by: Marcus Aurelius at October 01, 2005 02:49 PM (hTZG+)

14 "In the same manner, racism can be reduced in america by aborting all white children." I concur with Demosophist in his response. I'll tell you, here where I'm from, I see more racism from the black folk. And most times it's born of paranoia. They expect most white people to be racist when they're not. I work for a restaurant and watched on more than one occasion when the manager has asked someone to leave because they've become confrontational. Sometimes it's white people and sometimes black. But everytime it's someone black, they cry racism. So yeah, it's a real problem. It's become a catchall reason for every grievance.

Posted by: Oyster at October 01, 2005 03:28 PM (YudAC)

15 labelling seems inappropriate when it isn't pushed by some agenda. For example during Katrina in New Orleans the looting was excused by the media labelling the looters as "poor black people" now I have known quite a few poor people in my time but does that mean they steal when given the chance? No. So why was there no outrage when they linked income -> criminal behavior ? Playing the race card these days is almost synonymous with having a royal flush.

Posted by: dave at October 01, 2005 08:48 PM (CcXvt)

16 Bennet defended racial comments with falsehood. http://mediamatters.org/items/200509300008

Posted by: Screaming At A Wall at October 02, 2005 03:32 AM (BmtfW)

17 CUSTOMER: Racism would not be reduced in America by aborting all white children. With blacks in the majority one would quickly find just how racist blacks are. Blacks are far more racist than whites. Look at Africa and the constant murders, rapes and attacks that continue. Whites are leaving for fear of the lives in massive numbers. Look at any prison population. Take your ass to an all black area of town as see what happens. How many white muggers are arrested in New York City compared to black muggers. How many blacks were attacked and killed in the superdome. But whites were attacked by blacks for no other reason than they were white. One young man was beaten to death by the animals. Right in front of hundreds of so called (good)blacks. How many looters were white in New Orleans? And I'm not talking about those that were taking food and essentials. How many whites were shooting at the white people attempting to save black asses? The truth is crime is rampant in black communities. Me, I believe in accepting the truth and working on it from there. Denying the truth promotes the problem. Your post is bullshit. Only accepted by candy assed black ass kissing liberals.

Posted by: greyrooster at October 02, 2005 10:01 AM (ywZa8)

18 I spit on your grave: I SPIT ON YOUR FACE.

Posted by: greyrooster at October 02, 2005 08:56 PM (ywZa8)

19 Racism would not be reduced in America by aborting all white children. With blacks in the majority one would quickly find just how racist blacks are. Blacks are far more racist than whites. Look at Africa and the constant murders, rapes and attacks that continue. Whites are leaving for fear of the lives in massive numbers. Honestly, I don't see why blacks in a modern society would be inherently more racist than whites. Granted tribaly people are more "racist" in the sense that they stick to their own tribe. And as a rule tribal warfare has taken no prisoners. The Tutsi and Hutu rivalry, however, is no more nor less vile than the ethnic cleansing in Serbia-Herzogovnia, which was white on white. The reason North Americans (especially Canada and the US) are generally less racist than other peoples is simply that they're better protected from invasion, and have a culture that's more centered on ideology than ethnicity. Of course, you wouldn't know than North Americans are generally less racist than other people if you listened to Cindy Sheehan and Michael Moore. Strictly speaking there isn't that much difference within western societies on "prejudice." They're all within a fairly narrow range. The two ends of the spectrum are Canada (least prejudiced) and Belgium (most prejudiced). And again the explanation is pretty straightforward. Belgium has been trampled by practically every power in every war since Charlemagne, while Canada (with a big menacing protector to the south) has almost never been invaded. It's purely a matter of which culture feels more secure. Has nothing to do with race.

Posted by: Demosophist at October 02, 2005 09:16 PM (0cPRt)

20 What Bennett should have said to avoid the charge of "racism" is that if you kill off all WHITE people then crime will dissapear. But he chose blacks because his entire point was that a racist could easily make that argument, but that such arguments are morally reprehensible, according to Bennett.

Posted by: Carlos at October 03, 2005 08:06 AM (GbzDT)

21 There is no explaining such a moronic,racist,stupid remark by a hypocrite like the gambling,womanizing,steak and booze guzzling moron bill bennet. to call for the extermination of an entire race is outrageous. to think this idiot wrote a book "of virtues"while he was losing millions at the crap tables is bad enough,I dont think even david duke ever said such a stupid thing,what an imbecile!

Posted by: joe at October 03, 2005 08:39 AM (FWGcT)

22 Nothing joe says is the truth. " Bennett called for the extermination of an entire race". What a bunch of bullshit. Joe are you a liberal democrat black muslim? That is the only group ignorant enough to come up with what you said. Gambling, womanizing, steak and booze guzzler. Hmmmm. Sounds like me. I didn't care much for Bennett until now. So I take it the Joe doesn't gamble. I bet on all football games. Joe doesn't like womanizing. So he apparently likes men. Joe doesn't eat steak. A veggie freak. Joe doesn't drink alcohol. Joe attacks our republican leader. Joe refers to David Duke as saying stupid things. But Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton he leaves out. Since Joe never brought these maggots up I now deduce that: Joe is a black democrat faggot veggie freak that doesn't like beer. WHAT A FRIGGING FREAK!

Posted by: greyrooster at October 03, 2005 02:22 PM (ywZa8)

23 to call for the extermination of the black race is outrageous.this imbecile who ghostwrote a book called"book of virtues"is so stupid,a steak and liquor guzzling(just look at his face and gut)womanizing gambler who spent the book profits at the craps table.Even David Duke never said anything so stupid.the man is an imbecile.period!

Posted by: joe at October 03, 2005 06:47 PM (dV2NF)

24 Joe, which part don't you understand? He did not "call for the extermination of the black race". He may have used a poor choice of words that others took wrongly. But he absolutely did not do what you suggest. You're going to have to do better.

Posted by: Oyster at October 04, 2005 07:16 AM (YudAC)

25 Oh, ferchrissake! Bennet was quoting a passage from a book . . taken in context, it was an anology, no more . . but as is the custom today, by so many, "let's lynch the mother******" for reading and quoting . . he stated that he didn't neccessarily agree with the passage, it was just to point out a point of view that some have . . . And you have the Racists who make good money for being Racist, Jesse, Al and that group, then Pelosi and her whole far left whiners association, who wait for ANYONE to say something that will get them in front of a camera and a bank of microphones. I don't pay much attention to Bennet or a lot of the far right, just as I think the whole Far left should be ignored to the point of "Termination" . . there's far too much emotion in Politics today, and that makes politics far less logical than it should be . . my nickle . . .

Posted by: large at October 04, 2005 09:47 AM (Ny1Tj)

26 Joe is like any other liberal idiot. He refuses to admit the truth and continues on with his stupid comments. Again, must be a black democrat faggot veggie freak who doesn't like beer. A weirdo at best.

Posted by: greyrooster at October 05, 2005 06:32 AM (ywZa8)

27 Bush hates poor people? Ha, Ha. Well why do we need them. Down with the poor. They don't pay their share of taxes. Ha, ha. What a bunch of shit.

Posted by: greyrooster at October 05, 2005 06:34 AM (ywZa8)

28 You all are IGNORANT and you don't know half of what blacks go through on a daily basis. I'm used to racist comment like that (and yes, saying somebody must be a "black democrat faggot" is racist.It doesn't even bother me because there are some shitty ass people in this world that will get what they deserve when they die. "Unless you was me, how could you judge me, I was brought up in pain you can't touch me. Police pursued me, chased cuffed and subdued me, talked to me rudely, cause I'm young, black, and I'm living a movie, not living by rules." Yes there are some racist blacks, but they wouldn't be that way unless given a reason to. I've walked in stores and been literally followed everywhere I go, treated differently, yes because I'm black. But all blacks are not violent....I am in college on a full scholarship. Young, black and educated......AMERICA'S NIGHTMARE

Posted by: Melissa at October 10, 2005 06:10 PM (Al5t1)

Hide Comments | Add Comment