September 06, 2004
Bin Laden, Still Not Captured
****Exlusive****Must Cite MPJ****Bin Laden Not Captured, Still****
News Flash--In an MPJ Exclusive, Dr. Rusty Shackleford can reveal that Osama bin Laden is still not in custody. MPJ can further reveal that left leaning bloggers question the timing of this news.
Posted by: Rusty at
11:57 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 50 words, total size 1 kb.
1
This report seems designed to embarass Bush.
Posted by: Walter E. Wallis at September 06, 2004 12:58 PM (7XPVo)
2
How can they capture a dead supposed human being?
~C
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at September 10, 2004 01:48 PM (D39Vm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Fatwa Against Hostage Taking, 34 Dead Hostages Question Timing
34 hostages have been killed since 9/11 and the threat of killing two Frenchman finally gets the Religion of Peas moving.
Telegraph:
Iraq's most senior Sunni religious body said yesterday it would issue a fatwa outlawing the abduction and execution of any foreigner in the country....
The fatwa was issued by the country's committee of Muslim scholars, or ulema. Although it had called for the release of reporters Georges Malbrunot and Christian Chesnot in the past, it had refused to condemn the kidnapping and execution of hostages from countries that backed the US invasion.
"We are going to issue a fatwa declaring that the kidnapping of foreigners in general is not Islamic and ordering that all hostages be released immediately," said Sheikh Abdul Sattar Abdul Jabbar, a senior cleric.PS-Religion of Irony update:
Refusing to comply with a fatwa, the most serious command that can be issued in Islam, risks damnation and execution.
Posted by: Rusty at
11:48 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 168 words, total size 1 kb.
Sabbath Blogging, Part Deux
Ask and ye shall receive. Thanks everyone for such insightful advice (except Rick James). The general consensus seems to be that bloggers like me, who write ten or more posts a day, ought to take a day off devoted to other activities. I know Mrs. Shackleford sure appreciated the fact that the computer stayed off all day. For lighter bloggers this might not be the case. The risk of course is that the sitemeter plunges when you do not post. I guess I'll live with that.
Just to clear up some confusion out there, I am a believer. On top of that I attend church regularly--every week in fact. And to add insult to injury I actually have some position of authority in the church--frightening, isn't it? So if I ever sound blasphemous you can be sure it's tongue in cheek. Besides, I think God doesn't mind people poking fun at all the dumbasses out there. Errr, well, at least I hope he doesn't.
Posted by: Rusty at
11:14 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 172 words, total size 1 kb.
September 04, 2004
Sabbath Blogging
I've been feeling pretty guilty about blogging on Sundays. As a Sabbath observer, I'm thinking that blogging isn't the most spiritual activity nor does it add to my overall day of rest experience. I'm not going to blog tomorrow and I'll see how I feel. Any other Sabbath observers out there who want to chime in? Do you think it's something I ought to think about giving up one day a week? I'm looking for both the religious/spiritual angle and the strictly rational argument. Anyway, I'll check back in on Monday and see what the masses think.
Posted by: Rusty at
10:41 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 101 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I think it's a good idea. This is something a person puts their whole heart and soul into and things are not always pretty. Sometimes you just have to take a break from it, not even read others, not even turn on the computer, take a nap, spend time with the family, watch nascar and just let the day take care of itself. One day a week is not too much to ask from oneself. That's spiritual, emotional, and a restful, relaxing idea - Sabbath or no Sabbath. One day just to yourself. It should be a given, Rusty. Take the day. Hope it's a good one.
~C
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at September 04, 2004 11:06 PM (D39Vm)
2
The appropriateness of whether or not you blog o the sabbath, to my mind, would depend entirely on why you blog at all.
If your blogging is based upon a passion to be perhaps the only Bible someone reads on a given day, through your example, then I believe your bloggin on Sabbath is appropriate. I would say it doen't matter what you blog about as much as who you blog as - if that makes any sense.
If you blog purely as a hobby or as a mundane work of some sort, I would refrain from blogging on the Sabbath.
A good example of another option is the Good News Saturday that Winds of Change runs for Shabbat.
Posted by: Joel (No Pundit Intended) at September 04, 2004 11:09 PM (DU9+H)
3
Lemme tell where I stand, Rusty:
I will not blog on Sundays. I have in the past, but I'm supposed to be a Sabbath observor myself, so no more of that, especially with tomorrow being a fasting day.
But neither can I blog from work anymore unless I'm willing to squeeze it into short breaks and a 30 minute lunch, which, frankly, I'm not. There's this word called "honesty" that's been pricking my conscience.
Thus I'm reduced to blogging, briefly, in the evenings and on weekends.
But I fell much less stressed for the change.
I'm with ya, bro.
Posted by: ccwbass at September 05, 2004 01:02 AM (xsXcU)
4
Despite my general confusion and support of war and killing and such (aimed in the right direction, of course) I am still a Quaker and do not generally hold with the idea that one day is any more sacred than the rest of Creation. So, technically, I am writing this on First Day rather than the Day of the Sun.
I observe the Sunday Sabbath anyway. Partially out of social convention and partially because it seems a reasonable way to make sense of being a small part of a big world and born (and yes, born again) into an inexplicable gift. So, no, unless there is something exceptional going on I do not blog on Sunday.
Sometimes I leave comments at other people's blog though.
Posted by: Ghost of a flea at September 05, 2004 02:43 AM (8/xNM)
5
If you're feeeling uneasy then listen to your gut. I think you should try it for a while and see if you feel better. Taking a day off will also give you more perspective and possibly a better blog when you do. The blogosphere is always quieter on the weekends anyway.
Posted by: Jane at September 05, 2004 01:19 PM (PcgQk)
6
Well, far be it for me to get preachy, but knowing your situation I can say that Sundays are not yours alone -- they belong to Mrs. Shackleford and the little beta versions running around the house. You spend enough time in the office, so I think that Sunday you owe to them.
Posted by: Leopold Stotch at September 05, 2004 01:34 PM (HIg68)
7
Just some thoughts on *Sabbath blogging* - I try to observe Sunday as the Lord's Day, but often end up doing things around the place that could be considered *working*, writing e-mails to family and friends, catching up on things - not very spiritual activities. Is Sunday the sabbath? Are we bound to observe the sabbath, or is that a commandment for Israel? Or is it a day to observe Christ's resurrection from the dead? Doctors and nurses work on Sunday... breaking news stories, wars, catastrophes need to be covered and they often happen on a Sunday. It's all down to what you feel the Lord would prefer you to do to best observe His day with reverence.
I do know that it's a slippery slope and you can end up not observing the day at all if you don't hold fast to observing the Lord's Day and start working on Sundays. It's an incremental process and has a tendency to de-sanctify or nullify the day. A day of rest and spiritual renewal is a great way to prepare for the battles of the week ahead. There's no commandment that I'm aware of in the Bible to the New Tetsament Church to keep the sabbath, although the early Church did indeed observe the sabbath (and other Jewish feast days). There are some early Church documents on the spiritual resoning behind Sunday observance, but I'm at a loss to find them as I write - I can post at a later date. The Byzantine (Orthodox) Church has numerous beautiful Sunday prayers (Troparia) connceting God's creation, Adam's resurrection through Christ, and The Second Coming, which are helpful in understanding the signifigance of Sunday in the liturgical scheme.
Anyway, I'm interested in reading other's thoughts on the matter. I'd like to return to observing Sunday with greater reverence than I now do... a little backsliding here. Thanks for the opportunity to post.
All the best,
robsta
:-)
Posted by: robsta at September 05, 2004 01:52 PM (etIyN)
8
"One man considers one day more sacred than another; another man consideres every day alike. Each one should be fully ocnvinced in his own mind."
Translation: do what your conscience tells you. I think God honors your decision.
Just my two cents.
ps. I like Leopold's advice too.
Posted by: gordon at September 05, 2004 04:21 PM (dEFhD)
9
First of all, I have to say, for some reason, I always assumed you were an agnostic, so the fact that you're concerned about the Sabbath threw me for a loop.
Second, I have to agree with Gordon. Also, if you are usin the word "Sabbath" in a Christian and not a Jewish sense, remember Jesus' comment, "Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath". If you are adhering to some sort of Sabbath schedule out of adherence to tradition or the Law, you're missing the point. Don't let rules of conduct established by man embellish on the truth of scripture -- remember to understand why we observe a Sabbath, not just WHEN.
Having said that, if your conscience tells you that your blogging is causing you to negelct your family, or your opportunity to rest, or worship, or fellowship with other believers, then follow what your conscience, guided by the Spirit tells you.
Posted by: Brian B at September 05, 2004 11:16 PM (HcPOX)
10
Bloggers set their own schedules, albeit other aspects of life must and do take place which help set those schedules.
I'll make a deal with you Rusty. You blog on my Shabbos and I'll read it on yours. ;-)
Posted by: bj at September 06, 2004 06:38 AM (kFyZF)
11
Certainly, you should cut down on the blogging about porn, booze, and sodomy on Sundays.
Posted by: James Joyner at September 06, 2004 11:01 AM (eDs6L)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Anwar Ibrahim's Sodomy Conviction Overturned
I was just
reading about how former Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's sodomy conviction was overturned. That's right, sodomy. Oh, and this wasn't a replay of
Lawrence v. Johnson. He was let out on a technicality. Had he the evidence that he had actually had sex with another man been better, well, let's just say Mr. Ibrahim would not be on a plane to see London's fabulous night-life right now. So, let's just keep the whole gay marriage thing in perspective, shall we? I'm looking in your general direction Sullie.
Posted by: Rusty at
09:33 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 101 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You wouldn't believe - or maybe you would - how many gays seem to believe there's no such thing as considered moral opposition to gay marriage. It's totally self-defeating, like the pro-abortion crowd's refusal to see that, yes, people do have considered moral opposition to abortion, and it's not just an academic issue about a woman's right to choose.
Q: How come these same people don't support my right to choose to own a gun?
Posted by: jeff at September 04, 2004 10:51 PM (0GFTF)
2
TX v Johnson? Wasn't that the flag-burning case?
Do you mean Lawrence v Texas?
Posted by: Christopher Cross at September 05, 2004 12:49 AM (akYOv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Militants Threaten to Behead Turkish Man
Another Turkish truck driver. ABC News:
Iraqi militants threatened to behead a Turkish truck driver if his company and the Kuwaiti contractor it works for don't stop their operations in Iraq within 48 hours, according to a videotape aired on Arab television Saturday.
Sickenning. If they follow through with their threat this would be the fourth
Turkish truck driver killed in the last week.
Posted by: Rusty at
09:17 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 74 words, total size 1 kb.
1
and how many overall from that company alone? Right now they can't transport oil from anywhere, so maybe they should take a break. They were going to let three go and they didn't - maybe everyone should also take a Sabbath day off. Do you think the terrorist would do so too? I know, don't bother to answer.
Why can't we find the good things that are going on instead? Like if we didn't post about these other dasdardly things anymore and they didn't get the coverage, think it would slow it down at all? No need to answer, just wishful thinking.
~C
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at September 04, 2004 11:10 PM (D39Vm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
U.S. Near Seizing bin Laden
Snooze. I've heard this one before. He's dead. Teets up. Six feet under. Wormfood. Proof? He's the Jihadi equivalent of Paris Hilton, pure media-whore. Go a month without seeing Paris on TV and you know she's dead. Same rule applies to Ossama bin Laden.
AP:
The United States and its allies have moved closer to capturing Osama bin Laden in the last two months, a top U.S. counterterrorism official said in a television interview broadcast Saturday.
"If he has a watch, he should be looking at it because the clock is ticking. He will be caught," Joseph Cofer Black, the U.S. State Department coordinator for counterterrorism, told private Geo television network.
Asked if concrete progress had been made during the last two months - when Pakistan has arrested dozens of terror suspects including some key al-Qaida operatives - Black said, "Yes, I would say this."
Posted by: Rusty at
09:03 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 154 words, total size 1 kb.
1
As I posted before; I think he's dead and in Pakistani hands and we'll find out about it through DNA testing for they'll never tell that they once had him in custody, tortured the bastard till he was dead. That is the Pakistani way. Same with Zarqawi too. Just my guess.
~C
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at September 04, 2004 11:13 PM (D39Vm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Iraq Closes al Jazeera Offices, Again
That's a good appetizer. I'd suggest a nice incitement to murder lawsuit to go with that. The main course would be to never let it open again. And for dessert? How does a nice JDAM sound? If killing in war is justified, why is shutting down hostile media outlets not? You know, cause when you kill someone dies. But when you shut down hostile media, the principle of free-speech is broken, but lives are saved. There has to be a trump card in there somewhere.
Xinhuanet:
The Iraqi interim government Saturday renewed closure of offices of the Arabic-language satellite television network Al-Jazeera over incitement toviolence.
The decision was taken as the Qatar-based channel did not submit explanations requested by the Iraqi government, the prime minister's office announced in a statement.
The statement said during the temporary closure since Aug. 5,the Iraqi Government had expected the al-Jazeera management to offer an explanation to the presented allegations or to officiallyrequest a description of the possible threat that the channel maybe imposing. However, none of this has happened."
"Additionally, al-Jazeera TV has not respected the decision taken by the ministerial national security committee and has continued to broadcast from within Iraq and interview individuals on Iraqi soil regardless of the temporary closure order," added it.
The government, therefore, decided to extend the ban on al-Jazeera from operating within Iraq until a time when its headquarters sends an official response of their policies andmotives within Iraq, said the statement.
Washington and Baghdad has frequently accused al-Jazeera ofinciting violence by screening "exclusive" video tapes from Muslim extremists, including al-Qaida terror network mastermind Osama binLaden.
Posted by: Rusty at
08:58 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 280 words, total size 2 kb.
The Bush Air National Guard Non-Story
Wait, so a friend of Bush's father tried to pull a few strings
when no string pulling was necessary? It reminds me of the student's Mom who called me on the day of a test begging me to let her son take a make-up. "Okay," I says to her, "I'll do you a favor--but don't go spreading it around that I let him take a make-up." Of course, I would have given him the make-up anyway and her son might have known that had he bothered to read the syllabus. But it always makes people feel good if they think they are the reason something gets done.
Posted by: Rusty at
08:46 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 119 words, total size 1 kb.
Jews Behind Russian School Massacre
I knew it.
Look long enough and the hidden hand of the J-O-Os will be revealed in all dastardly deeds:
Ali Abdullah, an Islamic scholar in Bahrain who follows the ultra-conservative Salafi stream of Islam, also condemned the school attack as 'unIslamic'. However, he insisted Muslims were not involved and revived an old conspiracy theory: 'I have no doubt that this is the work of the Israelis, who want to tarnish the image of Muslims.'
Posted by: Rusty at
08:21 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 84 words, total size 1 kb.
I'm a Playful Primate, Hell Freezes Over
Something is truly wrong with the blogosphere.
Thank you everyone for linking me!!!! If you're not on my blogroll too, I apologize. Just send me an e-mail saying, "Hey, dorkwad, where's my link?"

PS-Don't expect this to last. These things have a tendency to change rapidly.
Posted by: Rusty at
08:00 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 60 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I can only vouch for the primate part ...
Posted by: Leopold Stotch at September 04, 2004 08:03 PM (i5DPf)
Posted by: The Commissar at September 04, 2004 08:07 PM (YWbMt)
3
Congrats!
I, on the other hand, am losing links so rapidly that by next week I should be (don't ask me how) carrying an actual negative number.
I wonder of there's a category for outer darkness?
Posted by: ccwbass at September 04, 2004 08:33 PM (PTMVh)
4
Not unless you commit blasphemy against the Instapundit. That is unpardonable.
Posted by: RS at September 04, 2004 08:35 PM (JQjhA)
5
Well, it HAS been a while since I offered alms to Allah. Maybe I can buy some linkitude.
Posted by: ccwbass at September 04, 2004 08:39 PM (PTMVh)
6
Right on Bro, I am behind ya (literaly and figuratively), congrats.
Posted by: David Anderson at September 04, 2004 09:19 PM (VCVxu)
7
Thanks. But when behind me please be sure to keep a safe distance from my arse...for your own protection.
Posted by: RS at September 04, 2004 09:21 PM (JQjhA)
8
Nice work. Couldn't happen to a nicer Primate.
Posted by: Gordon at September 04, 2004 10:32 PM (dEFhD)
9
Woo-hoo! Cue "Monkey Man" by the Rolling Stones, and crack open a celebratory PBR. Congratulations, Shack.
Posted by: Johnny Walker Red at September 05, 2004 12:26 PM (6Kr48)
10
Damn, I'm still a flappy fish or something. I need to take some lessons from you, guy. Start promoting m'self, or something. Write a book, maybe. Have sex with somebody famous (besides Eleanor Holmes Norton).
Posted by: Demosophist at September 05, 2004 01:29 PM (turqZ)
11
Its got to be the lime green color that everybody is attracted to.
Congrats dude.
Posted by: Jane at September 05, 2004 07:55 PM (PcgQk)
12
BTW what is the difference or why is there a difference between the average daily hits and the eco-ranking? Anybody?
Posted by: Jane at September 05, 2004 08:12 PM (PcgQk)
13
*Sniff*, and I knew you when you were only an insect.
Posted by: Simon at September 07, 2004 10:28 PM (GWTmv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 03, 2004
Llama Liveblog Reminder
Remember, the live-blogging of the Wonkette/Andrew Sullivan ambush will begin at 4:15 CDT.
Click here to join the butchery!!
UPDATE: Whew. Steve pulled through for us, even if Sullie didn't show. I think I heard something about meeting a bear on the way to the meeting....Anyhoo, this is what it is like to be a political scientist. I know on TV there's a whole lot more grave-robbing and bullwhip swinging, but in reality the life of a political scientist is not so glamorous. FYI-Woodrow Wilson was the 1st President of the American Political Science Association. Yips!
PS: Steve
Busted!! Gordon the Cranky Neocon has the 'real deal'
Posted by: Rusty at
03:36 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 113 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Brian B at September 03, 2004 04:57 PM (OnnW3)
2
Me thinks the only people being ambushed is us.
Posted by: gordon at September 03, 2004 05:56 PM (dEFhD)
3
Dude, if true, that's not funny. It's 5 months too late for April Fools.
Posted by: Brian B at September 03, 2004 06:06 PM (OnnW3)
4
Maybe the llamas got ambushed?
Posted by: Pixy Misa at September 04, 2004 12:18 AM (+S1Ft)
5
Rusty--I was only yanking your leg on the whole jawa stuff....no worries!
Posted by: Steve the Llamabutcher at September 04, 2004 04:14 PM (049sd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
What Bounce?
Bush Opens Double-Digit Lead Mecca leaning bow:
Allah
Posted by: Rusty at
02:59 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 12 words, total size 1 kb.
1
May we start gloating? Glenn and Ace and Free Republic are all over it too, I've posted on it, and rumor has it they have the vapors over at DU (I can neither confirm nor deny as I refuse to provide them with any traffic whatsoever).
Posted by: Brian B at September 03, 2004 03:09 PM (OnnW3)
2
Well, makes my prediction of a 20% win for Bush look a bit less insane. One cautionary note: Kerry usually has a rather intense final push, and many of his elections have been won in the last few days. Definitely not time to gloat.
Posted by: Demosophist at September 03, 2004 03:56 PM (turqZ)
3
Kerry usually has a rather intense final push
Just ask Teresa.
Thank you! I'm here all week! Try the Veal! Don't forget to tip your server!
Posted by: Brian B at September 03, 2004 04:19 PM (OnnW3)
4
Well, at the very least movement is in the direction I was hoping for.
Posted by: RS at September 03, 2004 04:26 PM (JQjhA)
5
Great news going into the holiday, but you know how polls are...
Posted by: LB at September 03, 2004 08:52 PM (ybj3R)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Robert Reich: Moonbat
I've never been a fan of Robert Reich, but I always respected his analysis...until now. I think he's been reading too much Chomsky and might have eaten a bad shroom. Does Reich really believe this stuff? From
his site plugging his book
Reason:
Bush's top 7 agenda items for a second term:
1) Invade and occupy Iran. [It's all a neocon conspiracy!!]
2) Make tax cuts permanent for richest 5 percent. [True, if not selective in data usage]
3) Patriot II: Let Ashcroft eavesdrop, monitor, watch, question anyone at any time. [Stop beaming radio beams into my head Ashcroft!!]
4) Gut most remaining evironment and worker safety protections. [Notice the word 'remaining' as if somehow the last four years have seen serious erosion in either.]
5) Pack Supreme Court with Scalia and Thomas clones, to overrule Roe v. Wade, bar gay marriage, and put prayer back in schools. [a) yes b) dumb conclusion c) 'allow' is different than 'put' dumbass]
6) Redistrict all congressional seats, to assure a permanent Republican majority. [Hey dumbass, state legislatures do this not the President.]
7) Make the budget deficit so big that Social Security has to be privatized because there's no money to fund it. [Backdoor conspiracy theory, you are a complete loon. As a percent of GDP we have had far greater deficits and I still pay my SS taxes. I mean, I wish this were true, but the deficit has nothing to do with SS.]
And how do we prevent Bush from invading country after country, killing our environment, and taking away our jobs?
Liberals' top 7 things to do to make sure Bush doesn't have a second term:
1) Make sure America knows Bush's top 7 second-term agenda items. [Reinforce people's natural gullibility and predisposition to believe in conspiracies.]
2) If you're not in a "battle-ground state," call every acquaintance who is, and ask whether they're better off today than four years ago. If the answer is "no," recruit them to go door-to-door for Kerry. [Of course, since the unemployment rate is only one-half of one percent higher today than it was four years ago you will need to call 200 people before you will find someone who is worse off today than they were four years ago. With not use the money saved on long-distance phone calls to give to a nice charity instead?]
3) Leave work from October 19 to November 2, to go door-to-door for Kerry. [Yes, that way when your boss fires you we can blame the increase in unemployment number and make Bush look bad.]
4) Say ocrats will give us affordable health care and better jobs" to everyone. [Lie to people. If you believe this and you say it you're not lying, your just stupid. Either way, your probably better off saying nothing at all.]
5) Call and remind right-wing talk radio hosts that the Framers of the Constitution erected a wall between church and state. [Lie to people, again. The framers wrote "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" and that "no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States." That's it. One founder wrote of a 'wall of seperation between Church and State.' One.]
6) Mention "Alabama National Guard" every time anyone says "Swift Boat." [Fair come back. Then again, why not mention "cut off ears" "raised villages" and "Ghenghis Khan" back at them.]
7) GIVE 'EM HELL. [Bring it on.]
Other than being completely nutty, I also object to Reich's book title. The problem with so many people on the left and right is that they seem to think their core beliefs are based on intelligence alone. In their minds, the other side is decieved. They think, "If only people were as smart as I am, or had all the facts as they exist, they would come to the same conclusion as me." No, people have differences of opinion because a) people have different values b) reality is not so easily measured that two equally intelligent or reasonable people might disagree.
To think that your position is reasonable, while the opposition is unreasonable is the height of arrogance. This is doubly so when you are not talking about a position, but rather an ideology which may includes multiple positions--each of which may or may not be reasoned. To argue that liberals are liberals because reason compelled them to it is the height of arrogance. The same is true for any ideological construct.
PS-Speaking of Nazi Ashcroft, Gordon has some quotes from Reich at the GOP convention.
Posted by: Rusty at
02:20 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 478 words, total size 5 kb.
1
Classic Liberal psychopathy. That is all this is.
Posted by: Chad Evans at September 03, 2004 03:32 PM (kbZV2)
2
Either that or Robert Reich and Paul Krugman have been sharing a bong.
Posted by: Brian B at September 03, 2004 04:58 PM (OnnW3)
3
You know I can't let that Chomsky comment go by unscathed... Here's what someone who's actually take the time to read his work thinks... Ronald Steel from this week's edition of The Nation:
"Noam Chomsky, who has produced a shelf of books on the subject of American imperialism, may no longer be able to surprise. But he does have the ability to zero in unerringly on the lies and distortions the government uses to sell its policies, and on the realities ignored or buried by the media. In Hegemony or Survival he argues that America's effort to "maintain its global dominance and military supremacy forever" threatens human survival. While this apocalyptic scenario may seem a long stretch to many, the book, with its wealth of information, is a thoughtful, well-argued antidote to the conventional wisdom. Chomsky, whether one agrees with him or not, is a national resource, never afraid to challenge power, and is solidly within the honored tradition of American radicalism."
Posted by: Professor Moonbat at September 04, 2004 03:37 AM (Me1FA)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Shock! Arabs 'Elect' Dictator
Reuters:
Lebanon's parliament is going ahead with a vote to extend the term of Syrian-backed President Emile Lahoud on Friday despite a U.N. Security Council resolution warning Damascus against interfering in Lebanon.
They won't get away with this!! The Arab street will rise up! The UN will invade and force it's will!!
Posted by: Rusty at
01:22 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 58 words, total size 1 kb.
Arabs found among hostage takers
Look away. This post is not happening. The real problem is Osama bin Laden. Al Qaeda is a small organization. Let's send special forces to take them out. BBC:
....20 hostage-takers had died in exchanges of fire with troops, at least nine of them Arabs.
Terrorists are linked together by common ideology, not by the boundaries of organizations. Al Qaeda, Hamas, the KLA, the Iranian government, and Chechens alll share a vision of the future worldwide Islamic state. That vision is the enemy. Hat tip:
LGF
Posted by: Rusty at
01:07 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 94 words, total size 1 kb.
1
hello?!! where do you think they got their training? see my post on 9/1 Re: the Qaeda/Chechen connection.
Posted by: michele at September 03, 2004 05:21 PM (JjrEO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Good Luck Mr. President!
And a speedy recovery.
UPDATE: Atrios readers take off tin-foil hats, question timing:
Say a prayer, if that's your style, that Bubba pulls through with flying colors and that his anesthesiologist is a diehard Dem.
------
I think it's great that this and the hurricane and even the russian school disaster(terribly tragic) is taking attention away from the RNC.
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
12:59 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 154 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ugly.
Almost made me regret posting a get well for the Prez on my blog.
But then, *I* can remember that this is about a human being, not a fucking political catfight.
Posted by: Brian B at September 03, 2004 02:11 PM (OnnW3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Al Khobar Slimeball Captured
Saudi Abdullah Bin Abdul Aziz Bin Ahmad al-Muqrran is in custody.
Update:
CNNThe recently captured militant came to the attention of Saudi authorities after the atttack in al-Khobar. They said he was identified as one who provided information and support for the four men who participated in the attack.
Twenty-two people died in al-Khobar in a hostage standoff that began May 29, ending with Saudi troops storming the residential compound where militants had taken more than 200 people hostage.
What was the name of the American who died in this incident? It was not Paul Johnson, who died on Jun 13. Anyone?
Linked by Communist Infiltrators
Posted by: Rusty at
10:12 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 113 words, total size 1 kb.
1
His last name was Floyd, I think. He was an executive in one of the companies there.
Posted by: Jimmie at September 03, 2004 11:05 AM (LIkgw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
74kb generated in CPU 0.1092, elapsed 0.2625 seconds.
131 queries taking 0.2302 seconds, 333 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.