December 24, 2004
Terrorist Website Admits Own Deaths
-
Associated Press
CAIRO, Egypt - A posting on an Islamic Web site Friday made a rare admission of significant casualties among insurgents fighting U.S. forces in Iraq, saying 24 guerrillas, most of them non-Iraqi Arabs, were killed in battles in Fallujah the day before.
The posting on a site known as a clearinghouse for militant Muslim statements said three hours of fighting in Fallujah on Thursday resulted in the "martyrdom" of 24 fighters from different Islamic factions, 19 of them from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Egypt, Syria and Jordan. The rest were said to be Iraqis.
This is a rare admission, however it is interesting to note the countries of origin of the terrorists killed. Certain "intellectuals" and politicians would like you to believe the fighters in Iraq are Iraqis while Iraq's own government acknowledges many are foreign born.
Cross-posted at In the Bullpen
Posted by: Chad at
09:33 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 155 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Why is it that (official, ha, lol) news agencies never discover anything until 6 months after the obvious? Rare admission, yes, however nothing new.
Posted by: greyrooster at December 24, 2004 10:10 AM (4Pc3X)
2
I think that most of us and our government does indeed know that these terrorists are not Iraqi's but they are Arabs so they can blend in as easy as any Iraqi individual.
What's most important right now is when are the Iraqi citizens step up to the plate and fight against these foreign invaders who are not there just to kill Americans, but millions of Iraqi's and they really do need to step up and take responsibility to put an end to terrorists killing them.
Cindy
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 26, 2004 06:50 PM (D39Vm)
3
No, it's never been the Iraqi people themseves but sometimes they get coerced into doing something they really do not want to do. The hardliners are from other countries coming over the border and when on another post, I said "nuke em" we'd get most of the terrorists in one place. GreyRooster, I think they already knew that these terrorists were never the Iraqi people from the very beginning, so it's nothing new. What is new are the fights between Sunni's and Shia's not helping matters. Not long ago in Pakistan, a man ran out of one mosque and threw a bomb in the other mosque; a week later, someone from the other mosque ran over and threw a bomb inside the other mosque. Well, Muscharaff put an end to that immediately. One mosque was sunni and the other a shia. Learning about Shia laws is a mind-boggler and will piss you off big time.
Cindy
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 27, 2004 01:37 PM (D39Vm)
Posted by: stink nuts at April 29, 2005 01:01 PM (aQB7Y)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Rumsfeld Makes Surprise Visit to Iraq
-
Reuters
MOSUL, Iraq (Reuters) - Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld paid U.S. troops in Iraq a surprise Christmas Eve visit after weeks of controversy over his handling of the war and perceived lack of sensitivity to U.S. forces and their families.
Rumsfeld's helicopter tour of Iraq on Friday took him to some of the country's most volatile cities -- Mosul, scene of this week's suicide attack on a U.S. military mess hall; Tikrit, ousted Iraqi President Saddam Hussein's hometown; and Falluja, where U.S. troops battled Iraqi insurgents last month.
His last stop was in Baghdad where he met Iraqi President Ghazi Yawar in the heavily fortified Green Zone before heading to a hospital to visit wounded troops.
In Mosul Rumsfeld visited staff and patients at the 67th Combat Surgical Hospital, which dealt with the casualties from the attack on Tuesday that killed 18 Americans, the deadliest such attack since the war in Iraq began in March 2003.
It is fair game to question whether or not Rumsfeld has done the best job for the country, but it is not fair to question this man's heart with the
autopen "controversey." Clearly the only controversey of the autopen was that it had to do with a man some loathe.
President Bush also called members of our armed forces to wish them a Merry Christmas. I guess someone refered to as a warmongering chimp also has a heart.
Cross-posted at In the Bullpen
Posted by: Chad at
09:24 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 252 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Betcha someone will be out this morning with a negative slant on this. I just can't figure what it will be.
Posted by: Gene 6-Pack at December 24, 2004 12:06 PM (7XPVo)
2
First of all, it was the MSM who made a big stink over 2 things that have been out of control, not the soldiers: they love this man!
Cindy
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 26, 2004 11:51 AM (D39Vm)
3
Is it your opinion, Chad, that president Bush is a "warmongering chimp?" If so, then I should hang you upside down, then shoot you.
He has a huge heart, just like Runsfeld himself.
Cindy
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 26, 2004 12:01 PM (D39Vm)
4
Cindy, I assume you're joking in making the assumption that was not sarcastic and that I actually believe President Bush is a "warmongering chimp."
Posted by: Chad at December 26, 2004 01:13 PM (g4z7Z)
5
Of course I'm joking, chad! :-)
Cindy
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 27, 2004 12:53 PM (D39Vm)
6
One of the things that happened when Rumsfeld was there that was really funny (remember he was there only 2 weeks ago) was one of the guys gave him Saddam's opium pipe and a box of matches that was taken from Saddam's stash when they found him. He laughed, thought that was great and put the stuff in his pockets. It was wonderful to see the reaction of that gesture. It was also wonderful to see the love, the support and the respect given this man when he surprisedly showed up in Mosul first. Even pinned a purple heart on one of the soldiers in that base's hospital. From There he went to Baghdad by helicopter and as soon as he left, there was that really major car bombing that destroyed everything in a one block radius but he had just left.
Last year, President Bush hid himself under a blanket on the floor of a regular vehichle, without his family knowing it (and it was his fathers 80th birthday) got on a plane and landed in Baghdad Iraq to the full surprise of everyone there and had dinner with them. I though that was so cool. Paul Bremer was the only one who knew he was there and he doled out - either Thanksgiving or Christmas - I think it was Christmas dinner to the troops. Very Cool.
Like Rumsfeld surprise visit, very, very cool since he had only been there two weeks ago. The man may be 72, but he's definitely still very cool.
Cindy
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 27, 2004 01:47 PM (D39Vm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Murky Tariq Aziz
About a week ago,
MSNBC reported that former Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz is "ready to name names" and implicate Saddam Hussein in murder. Also reported was that he appeared "frail in orange prison garb and plastic handcuffs."
Today, a report from Xinhua states that Aziz "is unwilling to testify against Saddam Hussein at a future war crimes trial." And, according to his lawyer, Badi Aref Izzat, Aziz is in "good heath [sic] and spirits."
Any questions?
Companion post at Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
08:49 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 87 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Aziz a professional liar for 20 years. I'm sure better witnesses than he can be found. Testifying against his ex-boss merely shows what a cowardly little shit he is. Hang em both. Should have already been done.
Posted by: greyrooster at December 24, 2004 10:16 AM (4Pc3X)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 23, 2004
Decorate the Pole; Festivus is Here
-
New York Times (via
Poliblog)
GATHER around the Festivus pole and listen to a tale about a real holiday made fictional and then real again, a tale that touches on philosophy, King Lear, the pool at the Chateau Marmont hotel, a paper bag with a clock inside and, oh yes, a television show about nothing.
The first surprise is that from Tampa Bay, Fla., to Washington, from Austin, Tex., to Oxford, Ohio, many real people are holding parties celebrating Festivus, a holiday most believe was invented on an episode of "Seinfeld" first broadcast the week before Christmas in 1997.
"More and more people are familiar with what Festivus is, and it's growing," said Jennifer Galdes, a Chicago restaurant publicist who organized her first Festivus party three years ago. "This year many more people, when they got the invite, responded with, `Will there be an airing of the grievances and feats of strength?' "
As a bit of a Seinfeld fan that many friends of mine might have noticed, this story is just too funny not to post upon. One of my all-time favorite episodes of Seinfeld is the one with Festivus (behind The Chicken Roaster). Thankfully my family does not celebrate Festivus, though it might be nice to simply have a pole instead of decorate a Christmas tree every year. Sure, you have to store a pole, but you don't have to worry about spacing out the Christmas lights just perfect with a bulb at the end of every single branch as my late grandfather was a stickler about.
Cross-posted at In the Bullpen
Posted by: Chad at
09:03 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 277 words, total size 2 kb.
1
The Chicken Roaster? I put Festivus second only to The Bizarro Jerry (the one where Jerry dates man hands).
Posted by: Leopold Stotch at December 24, 2004 11:04 AM (gHm92)
2
All good episodes...the best, though, is clearly the one where Kramer finds the old Merv Griffin set and puts it up in his apartment.
That, or the "Serenity Now!" episode.
Posted by: Venom at December 24, 2004 12:03 PM (dbxVM)
3
Bah! Now you both are just being fusilli.
Posted by: Chad at December 24, 2004 12:34 PM (t1ahj)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Tawhid wal Jihad Denies Involvement in Weekend Car Bombings
-
Associated Press
"We, Al-Qaida in Iraq, declare that we are not responsible for the explosions and operations in Karbala and Najaf and we tell anyone who supports Americans and joins them in their atheism and criminality that we will continue our jihad against you by all means," it said in a statement posted on the Internet.
The denial came a day after the arrest in Karbala of six suspects, including a citizen of a former Soviet republic, on suspicion of involvement in the attacks. Police spokesman Rahman Meshaway said Thursday that the unidentified foreigner had admitted getting training from al-Qaida in a European country.
Funny how Tawhid wal Jihad (Al Qaeda in Iraq) denies this car bombing yet proudly boasts of similar car bombings throughout Iraq followed by threats to anyone they deem is cooperating with Democracy. Of course the group had to insert the same threat they have used for well over a year now.
The six suspects that were arrested yesterday indicates an argument I've made before regarding jihadists training and being indoctrinated in Europe. As many of my readers know, these European jihadists travel to Syria where they are outfitted for terrorist activity and sent into Iraq. It is a disturbing cylce of events that we seem not to be able to handle. Then again, a little help from some of our European "allies" certainly could help curb the growing radical Islamic front in Europe.
Cross-posted at In the Bullpen
Posted by: Chad at
04:03 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 262 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: greyrooster at December 24, 2004 10:19 AM (4Pc3X)
2
This car bombing is also on Terroristmedia and it looks like the Army of Al An Sunnar is responsible.
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 26, 2004 11:28 AM (D39Vm)
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 26, 2004 12:04 PM (D39Vm)
4
Grey Rooster - European allies aren't the only one's there - El Salvador, Columbia, Japan, China, NZ and of course Australia among the many. Russia couldnt go with all their problems and on the base of war themselves, Poland, Smaller countries in Europe even if the bigger European countries like France and Germany. There's a website that lists all the countries that make up the coalition. Spain moved out and look what happened to them. Those that could, sent a percentage. I'm not sure about the Phillipines where many of the camps are and their destruction of that country - the problem there is I hope we don't help them, but we are because the USA always helps those who need it. Right now, the coalition is made up of 30 plus countries. Kerry's speech during the debates didn't help any either; he made it terrible for those other countries to be there and stay there. You can thank him for their only being 30+ countries as part of the coalition mostly made up of the UK and the USA.
Cindy
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 27, 2004 01:56 PM (D39Vm)
Posted by: zgein at December 31, 2004 03:29 PM (d3Hsy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Kofi Calls Bush
As much criticism as I've leveled at both Kofi Annan and the United Nations, I feel I should present a story that is positive towards Annan because at times I've been too critical of the oil-for-food swindler.
WASHINGTON - President Bush took a condolence call Thursday from U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, who said he mourned the loss of more than 20 people in an apparent suicide attack at a U.S. military outpost in Mosul, Iraq.
This was a kind gesture by the man who runs the UN, though I can't help if his comments regarding supporting the Iraqi people later in the
article are accurate. If Annan truly supports the people of Iraq, he would send more than
22 UN electoral officials to Iraq for next month's historic elections. Then again, Annan doesn't believe the
elections will happen.
A kind gesture of goodwill between Annan and President Bush is nice to hear, but for those words to resonate with Americans Annan needs to back his wording with action.
Cross-posted at In the Bullpen
Posted by: Chad at
02:34 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 179 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I think it was jus a PR ploy. What the MSM calls a "photo op"
Kofi is mad as H--- we went into Iraq for obvious financial reasons. Since it came out last month that members of his family were getting kickbacks in the "Food for Oil" boondogle; he and the MSM have been working on a campaign to convince us that he is really a "good" guy. If you buy that then you may believe that the homicide bombers ( whose families got between $10,000,000 and $25,000,000 of Sadam's kick backs) were spreading Allah's love.
Rod Stanton
Cerritos
Posted by: Rod Stanton at December 23, 2004 04:02 PM (tHUgl)
2
Too critical of the oil for food swindler? Are you nuts? No one could be critical enough. Kofi Annon is a bum. Always has been and always will be. A crook is a crook. Enough of this crap of protecting the good name of the UN. It doesn't have a good name.
Posted by: greyrooster at December 23, 2004 09:01 PM (visY3)
3
Rod, normally I'd agree it was a PR move, however usually in a PR move the key for making it work is to include the media. The statement was made by the White House Press Secretary. That's what makes this a bit odd to me and makes me believe there is something going on behind the scenes with the U.S. and U.N.
Greyrooster, I realize it's hard to tell sarcasm in the written word, but imagine I inserted some there. I've been calling for his resignation since August when he entered into the political arena.
Posted by: Chad at December 23, 2004 09:07 PM (S/NaF)
4
Sorry, Too much company today. Too many margaritas. Too much food. Too many stories. Too much Venom. Too much everything. Life is good. Just trying to enjoy it. Partying with friends. One more month until 1st grandson. 2 more months until my son comes back from Iraq. Two turkeys and one ham to cook. Forgive me for missing the obvious. Gotta go as everyone here says give it up for tonight. Sure hope I get a Penn International reel for Xmas. Going to peek when everyone goes to bed. Jim, James, Venom, kiss my ass. Everyone else have a good Xmas.
Posted by: greyrooster at December 23, 2004 10:57 PM (visY3)
5
I realized I sounded too acusatory in my previous statement. I just meant that I should have elaborated more or left out sarcasm in the written word.
Posted by: Chad at December 24, 2004 12:05 AM (NK+l7)
6
Chad, Kofi Annan is still a swindler, so is his son and his nephew and he has done nothing about the genocide going on in the Darfur region of the Sudan among many things. I believe like other old readers of this site that UN building should be bulldozed into the closest river in New York (look in archives) and either forget about having a UN or actually having one that will do the job it's supposed to do. Having his sidekick resigning today - so immediately - makes you wonder if that poor man did that to take the pressure off Kofi Annan or because he knew something. The UN is useless and so is Kofi Annan and it's been that way for too many years now. He has not stepped up to the plate and I doubt he ever will.
Greyrooster: take a deep breath and try to relax and set your mind so that certain people don't get to you; it'll save your sanity my friend.
And I would like to wish everyone a Happy Holiday, no matter what religion you are but please don't take 'CHRIST' out of Christmas.
God Bless,
Cindy
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 24, 2004 12:25 AM (D39Vm)
7
Greyrooster Grandkids are great! I love mine. Where did you go to boot? You think the way I do. Was it Daygo or LeJune?
Do all Jareheads think the same way or what. We were all great!
Posted by: Rod Stanton at December 24, 2004 12:27 PM (tHUgl)
8
Do we need anymore reason to tell the UN to get lost? i mean why do we have to put up with this bunch of idiots lets just tell them to get lost and be gone
Posted by: sandpiper at December 24, 2004 03:02 PM (fvObb)
9
HOW EASY THE IRAQI'S FORGET HOW LIFE WAS UNDER SADDAM HUSSEIN.
by Dr. Jack Shepard__________________________________________________ _____________________________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/dr_jack_shepard/
_________________________________________________Dr. Jack Shepard remembers consoling a father of one of the Children dying in Baghdad's Children's Hospital in March 2001; due to the lack of basic food supplements. by Dr. Jack Shepard Dr. Jack Shepard remebers consoling a father of one of the Children dying in Baghdad's Children's Hospital in March 2001; due to the lack of basic food supplements and adequate medicine, because Saddam Hussein choose to spend Billions of dollars of the Iraqi people money on himself. Dr. Shepard said presently the extremists in Iraq do not respect the uniqueness of each human as they were created by Allah. Dr. Shepard's repeats what the Prophet Mohammad said almost 1400 years ago, "this man will dwell in hell by his actions and this man will dwell in heaven by his." Basically what Dr. Shepard is saying that the teachings of Mohammad have been forgotten by the extremists and presently by their actions the extremists will be judged by the deeds and Allah will send them to dwell in Hell forever. The Prophet Mohammad teaching were based on submission to Allah; to do right and be granted eternal life. Dr. Shepard prayers for the day when the Iraqi people can get on with their lives. If the Iraqi People do not learn to respect each other and begin to speak out against the antisocial behavior and protest it the streets; the Iraqi people will never begin to be able to get on with their lives. To avert continued anarchy the mass of Iraqi People who really wish peace and happiness must speak out in the streets for peace, their silence to what is now happening only allows this twist and distorted situation where we find one Iraqi Brother killing another. This is only happening because many power-monger in the Iraqi population each wish to be an important power-mongers even if he has to kill his fellow Iraqi to establish their dominance as the new Iraqi leader. These people are truly people without a soul and do not fear Allah as the Prophet Mohammad taught. They are creating an environment for themselves where they will never see heaven. I and the world grow weary that this rebellious attitude has now become a fad. Presently in all truth many Iraqi's have become real mindless hypocrites by not stopping and protesting this new generation of power-mongers who are beginning to kill each other in ever greater numbers because they are set on ruling Iraq but reject the world trying to help their fellow Iraqi who are dying and starving because of their inhuman behavior. May Allah Bless Iraq and the Iraqi People with Peace and Happiness. This will only happen when the Average Iraqi man on the street cry out remember Allah you my brothers of Iraq. You must stop this evil behavior or you will dwell in the fires of Hell forever. Dr. Jack Shepard, founder of People for Peace group www.shepardusgov.com, www.care2.com/c2c/group/People_for_Peace_Group Click on image for a larger version http://www.flickr.com/photos/dr_jack_shepard/
Posted by: Dr. Jack Shepard at December 25, 2004 08:54 AM (O22/f)
10
Chad, you're doing fine!
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 27, 2004 02:09 PM (D39Vm)
11
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DR. JACK SHEPARD'S VIDEO WARNING IRAQI SUICIDE BOMBERS THAT THEY GO TO HELL NOT HEAVEN,
Visit www.shepardusgov.com
By Dr. Jack Shepard, founder of People for Peace Group.
Hello let us all pray for Peace.
I have made a 2.5 minute video Warning the Iraqi Suicide Bombers to beware; if they kill themselves they go to Hell not Heaven.
Please visit www.shepardusgov.com to see my Video warning to the Iraqi Insurgents.
If my message gets somehow to the Iraqi Insurgents and the Palestinian Suicide Bombers, and they learn what they do is against the Koran I think they will stop.
Then God willing we will have Peace In Israel and Iraqi and Love and Peace will have a chance.
Please copy my CD if anyone wishes TO HELP SPREAD THESE WORDS TO THE SUICIDE BOMBERS BEFORE THEY KILL THEMSELVES AND MANY OTHER POOR INNOCENT PEOPLE.
Then take it to your local TV Station to play for 2.5 minutes to stimulate a discussion about Suicide Bombing as a Weapon of War.
Please advise the TV station after they play my brief 2.5 minute video. I would suggest that the TV station organizes to have a group of religious scholars from all faiths give their opinion what each religion teaches its followers about Suicide.
May God Bless the World with Love and Peace
Dr. Jack Shepard, founder of People for Peace To contact
Dr. Shepard with ideas or comments Email: middle.east@flashnet.it
The ORIGINAL text (to use in translation into Arabic) of Dr.Jack Shepard, founder of People for Peace Group's warning to the Insurgent suicide bombers.
My brothers in Iraqi I pray for you; I am Dr. Jack Shepard founder of People for Peace (to use in translation into Arabic)
I warn the militant insurgents in Iraq you are now fighting and killing mostly innocent Iraqi men, women, and children, you do not fear Allah, if you continue to obey the evil publishing of fatwa (edicts) by Iraqi religious leaders.
These edicts are blaspheme against Allah and Prophet Muhammad, you defy the divine assertions that the Quran is complete, perfect, fully detailed, and shall be the only source of religious guidance Prophet Muhammad stated in very strong words, against issuing any religious teachings besides the Quran.
Fatwa were never authorized by Allah or the Prophet Muhammad, edicts are not the Word of God.
Presently many of the scholars in Iraq are engaging in major acts of disbelief by issuing these edicts. Believing in Allah means to believe Him and accept His teaching and His word.
Choosing the scholars or the dictionary over Allah reflects a disbelief in Allah and His word (Quran).
We each are living out AllahÂ’s plan; Allah knew each of us before we were born. What ever we do we can not hide it from Allah. As Mohammad once said this one, by his actions was made for Paradise and this one, by his actions was made for the fire of Hell.
The Jihad Organizations lie to the insurgents. These Organizations are led by these misguided individuals that only increase the tribulations of the entire Muslim community by not telling to young insurgents that suicide bombings according to the Quran guarantees punishment “in the fire of hell, wherein they shall dwell forever.”
Suicide bombing by young uninformed Muslim youths had been carried out almost routinely as a mean of revenge in the Iraq conflict.
These suicide bombers created an intolerable situation, no permission can be found in Islam to avengence by suicide bombing or by targeting the innocent civilians.
These young desperate Muslim youth have been taught what is NOT in the Quran, and what was never promised by Allah.
I pray my brothers in Iraq remember these things before Allah announces his verdict on you, presently only those who do not fear Allah are blocking the ability of ordinary IraqiÂ’s to take control of their own country
These fatwa (edicts) are presently causing limitless grief and sadness for your brothers in Iraq.
You militant insurgents who blindly obey these fatwa (edicts) have created a monstrous and inhumane situation unnecessarily in Iraq by killing and harming mostly your fellow Muslim Brothers if you continue your actions you will be made for the fires of hell..
My Iraqi brother l still hope and pray for you.
I only can Warn the Iraqi insurgents; stop killing your brothers Unfortunately most of the men, women and children who you are hurt and killed most often have nothing to do with anything but are just ordinary Iraqi trying to live, praying for their nightmare to end.
Those of you that follow these fatwa (edicts) how can you call your actions acts of resistance, all your doing is maximizing the suffering of your Muslim brothers in Iraq.
In the name of Allah stop. Allah sees all.
Presently you have to understand your actions are not right-doing for the Iraqi men, women and children that you are killing and maiming by exploding cars and bombs in the streets or shooting mortar or grenade launchers into the crowded streets.
You militant insurgents want to the American Coalition to go home; call a truce and learn to love your neighbors; as people made for Paradise would, and at that moment, the Coalition will immediately begin to start going home.
Fear Allah! How can you call your actions acts of resistance, all your doing is maximizing the suffering of the Iraqi people, suirely you do not fear Allah. Istill hope and pray for you..
I, myself pray that Allah blesses Iraq and the Middle East with Peace.
Allah made us all, do not be blinded by these blashme of these Edicts or fataw's these Coalition soldiers or Iraqi Policeman were all created by Allah. They have wives, children and families just like you.
They would be happier than you to soon be able to return home to their families and loved ones, as you would be happier to return to your families and a normal life.
We have to remember if we break Allah's law, by obeying false lord’s fatwa (edicts) we move ourselves away from Allah's mercy and support. Allah is send upon you humiliation and Allah will not remove it from you until you return to (practicing) Islam (correctly),”
Only when you stop killing our brothers and exploding cars in the streets, the kidnapping and murder of people in a manner which contradicts the teachings of the Prophet Mohammad.
You insurgents have to remember there is nothing holy about a war in Islam. If we call a truce with your brother Iraqi's the sooner the American Coalition force will have to leave Iraqi soil, ending their occupation and give you the control of their destiny.
In the name of Allah:end this slaughter of thousands of your innocence Iraqi brothers both men, women and children immediately.
Fear Allah
In the name of Allah: stop doing what is not pleasing to Allah or surely you will dwell in the fires of Hell for ever.
Allah is all knowing and seeing.
By Dr. Jack Shepard, founder of People for Peace
Posted by: Drjackshepard at July 02, 2005 09:51 AM (D3TC8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Suicide Bomber Wearing Iraqi Soldier Uniform
-
Associated Press
BAGHDAD, Iraq - The suicide bomber believed to have carried out this week's devastating attack on a U.S. military dining tent, killing more than 20 people, was probably wearing an Iraqi military uniform, a U.S. general said Thursday.
For background information, click
here and
here.
Even though it has not been confirmed the suicide bomber was wearing an Iraqi military uniform, for the sake of argument let's assume it has been confirmed. Naturally the question remains is how did a terrorist get an Iraqi military uniform.
The suicide bomber, according to the Ansar al-Sunnah website, worked at the base since October therefore he would have had access to whatever uniforms were left behind. His exact position within in the base however is not known so he very well could have been an Iraqi soldier, though no reports indicate this is the case.
Ansar al-Sunnah has systematically attacked Iraqi soldiers in several terrorist attacks. I have not found any reports indicating any clothing was taken from soldiers before they were executed, however based upon terrorists snatching up identification and other personal items of their victims this can be a reasonable explanation.
Cross-posted at In the Bullpen
Posted by: Chad at
01:25 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 210 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Also, I imagine that an Iraqi Army uniform wouldn't be too hard to fake. I don't know, but I would assume that they are A) not as sophisticated as a U.S. Army uniform, and B) there isn't yet a strong tradition of uniform discipline that would make small imperfections and shortcuts stand out.
Of course, the last uniform I wore was a Boy Scout Uniform in 7th grade, so I may not know what I'm talking about.
Posted by: Eric at December 23, 2004 02:29 PM (hrQvk)
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 23, 2004 03:01 PM (D39Vm)
3
"I hate being right."
Don't worry, it rarely happens.
Posted by: Venom at December 23, 2004 03:40 PM (dbxVM)
4
Instead of how he got a military uniform, I think a more troubling question would be how he got the explosives into the camp. Someone wasn't doing their job.
As for the military uniform, he could have easily gotten one if he joined the Iraqi army. It's not like they're doing background checks or anything. And they're so desperate to have an Iraqi army take care of business that they're probably accepting 90% of the people that apply.
Posted by: Venom at December 23, 2004 03:44 PM (dbxVM)
5
Agreed! Wasn't anyone watching out for the soldiers outside the mess hall? I don't get it! How the hell did this guy slip through????
Posted by: Laura at December 23, 2004 08:58 PM (ptOpl)
6
Oh stop it. The cooks are Iraqis. Explosive could have come in in food supplies, janitorial supplies, etc: Where there is a will there is a way. Crap, they smuggle drugs, guns, hacksaws into prison.
This is part of war when you are fighting with a people to cowardly to fight heads up. Our bases should be 100% American.
Posted by: greyrooster at December 23, 2004 09:10 PM (visY3)
7
Look, I already posted this elsewhere while at the same time mentioning CB of "My War" blog which I have saved and I have lots of sources. This particular FOB is absolutely huge and holds battalians, has it's own hospital, it's the main area for an airport, Iraqi's work there - they are drivers, cooks, translaters and also trained Iraqi guard are stationed there now so they can go out on ops with the US forces for further training and yes, they have destroyed mosques up there - we didn't have a choice. I also read Hammorbi and other soldier blogs as often as I can, so I learn a lot from the guys on the ground. It would be very easy for any Iraqi who works there or ING stationed there to be compromised and that is exactly what happenedl. Ansar all-Sunnah does a lot of research, even hacking into our satelites, are computer savvy and was on the base for some time if any of the soldiers there didn't think he was out of place. He fit in because he's been there awhile - he was compromised in some way; possibly his family was held hostage (probably dead now). In CB's one post, he had a woman translator who taught English at the university there; then one day she did not show up. Her sister was beheaded and the rest of the family was also compromised, so she quit her job there as a translator without notice. At the same time, they also beheaded the female Dean of the college there. When you are put in that kind of situation and want to save your family or whatever is being held agaist you, you'll do anything to save them when all he had to do was tell any of the battalian commanders. Since this group plans out all their attacks for maximum effect, this man could also have been on of the Al Ansar soldiers, getting to know the base, those on it, gaining their trust, so never in their mind would they consider someone working for them could be capable of such action; that is why it is so shocking. So it really is easy to get on the base as a worker. Not long ago, they built a second gym and weight room for the soldiers so whomever it was, they were not worried because they trusted him. I am glad CB is home instead of being there; I cannot remember how many battalions are located there but they have to step up on security a big harder so this does not happen again. He also could have been one of the ING based there because all the police stations have been blown up already by terrorist and was compromised somehow. Global Security is also based there but they have been a little lax on security because all the people coming and going are familar to the solders and this suicide bomber was famiiar to them. There's no doubt he and his family were compromised. He may have been a daily worker there or an ING who was trusted by the men. Either was Ansar-al-Sunnah plans their attacks out long ahead of the actual deed and this Iraqi could have been turned. Baghdad will be next after Falluja, then Mosul which is always getting the hit and run morter shells. Many of the soldiers there actually sleep through this. This is also the only base that has strykers out of Fort Lewis in WA when we should have strykers through out the country. And to accept the MEN IN BLACK, there is no way of knowing that an Iraqi has been turned unless they tell someone for help and you can bet this man ie terrorist has been there for some time making himself known, getting to know the other soldiers, working along with the other soldiers, so it is quite possible that this can happen and hopefully, it won't be the last time. Mosul will become the hotbed very soon and I sure hope they're getting ready for that eventuality. Even ING's can be turned if they are compromised. Personally I can't even imagine lowing myself up but these people will do anything to turn the people of Iraq and the terrorists will do just about anything to hit their target with lots of planning and preparation.
And to end, not only do my prayers and love go to our troops, I would like to wish everyone a Happy Holiday but just don't forget to support our troops. They make it so that we can be here and have computer access and all the other freedoms we take for granted. Thank every person you know who was ever in a war and the troops in this war who are going to suffer more than what they've already lost, because 99% of them will have compression injuries to the brain.
I also think that if you are a terrorist, you should dress differently than a civilian - makes it a bit unfair. Geez, did I get off track or what?
Cindy
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 24, 2004 01:12 AM (D39Vm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Deserters In Canada
Listening to the elite media, one might get the impression that the number of people deserting the U.S. Armed Forces and going to Canada will soon exceed the number of conservatives in the country. As indicated by this
report, that's not what's happening. In fact, based upon best available information, deserters arriving in Canada total no more than a few handfuls. Nonetheless, desertion to a foreign country has international political implications so the media clamps on the story like a lamprey. This is not to say that a
stay-at-home deserter who wants headlines can't get them. The media will always oblige steaming piles of news.
The Canadian authorities are currently in the process of reviewing the applications for refugee status of a few deserters with a determination expected in the next few months. Those requesting to be classified as something other than criminals and cowards include Brandon Hughey, David Sanders, and Jeremy Hinzman. Deserter Daniel Felushko has dual U.S.-Canadian citizenship so he gets a pass.
Although there's no mass exodus of deserters, the exact number is unknown. According to a spokesman for the Immigration and Refugee Board, Serge Arsenault, privacy laws prevent release of that type of information. This seems odd. Whose privacy is being protected? The Canadian government?
All in all, the handfuls of deserters going to Canada seeking refugee status will have to prove that they have "a well-founded fear of persecution based on their race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion." It's sure that they have fears, but not of persecution. It's fear of incarceration for violating the contractual obligations they have with the United States of America. Interestingly, based on a recent report, the deserters may have been able to avoid the entire bureaucratic process by greasing a few palms. Apparently, permanent residency status has been marketed for a mere $4,000.
In closing, it's probably prudent for people to remember the names of the deserters so that, if they apply for employment, they are not hired into positions requiring trustworthiness and strength of character.
Companion post at Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
09:49 AM
| Comments (21)
| Add Comment
Post contains 353 words, total size 3 kb.
1
If they choose to desert, let them go. Who wants them anyway. Our men in uniform couldn't trust them. However, they should never, never be allowed on American soil again. Let them stay in Canada. Canada deserves them.
Posted by: greyrooster at December 23, 2004 10:50 AM (visY3)
2
I'd be pretty surprised to see the Canadian government take them in on refugee status. These soldiers broke their contractual obligations with the military and should face punishment. Canada would be loathe to be seen giving refugee status to people that are going to be prosecuted for their own actions, not because they are a special minority group, or anything similar.
By the way greyrooster, you do realize that Canada has troops fighting in Afghanistan, don't you?
Posted by: Venom at December 23, 2004 10:57 AM (dbxVM)
3
Ya well, some people put a penny in the collection plate to. I guess they figure that will pay their share of the bills.
Posted by: greyrooster at December 23, 2004 02:10 PM (visY3)
4
Sometimes a penny is all people can afford.
It's pretty well-known that Canada has a very small military. Sending a couple of thousand troops to Afghanistan (I think that's what it was at its peak) actually stretches Canada's military pretty tight. And those soldiers did very, VERY well while they were there. So well, in fact, that the US military tried to award some of those soldiers medals.
Posted by: Venom at December 23, 2004 03:31 PM (dbxVM)
5
Yea, Yea, been there, done that. Liberals in our government always try to award someone if they feel it's politically expedient. Earning has nothing to do with it. Those snow monkeys aren't any more deserving of medals than our boys. Probably not as much. They don't wish to be on our team 100%, fine. Let us remember. All they're doing is catering to the multitude of ragheads they let into Canada. The last 5 years I've been a lot of time in Canada. I know what the real Canadians say and think. Go up to Missasauga and have a pint and maybe you'll come back with a different view. Try a bar in the West Edmonton mall and talk to the locals. See what they think.
Once again, if you don't experience it you know nothing about it. Some things are not said in the papers or on the internet. The most important things. What the ordinary people believe.
Posted by: greyrooster at December 23, 2004 09:37 PM (visY3)
6
Yes, our Canadian brethren sent soldiers to Afghanistan. All Americans should be grateful that they did join in the war on terror, albeit a small contribution. Now, if the Canadian government would be so kind, would they mind sending back the yellow-bellied cowards so that they can spend some time in Leavenworth, or perhaps even a nice firing squad. The left hails these deserters as some sort of statesmen, keeping their conscience clear against an evil and unjust war. Let me see, if I look at the fine print when people sign up for the military, it doesn't say anything about "If you join the armed services, and you are sent to a war you don't agree with, you are released from your commitment...." Nope. Not there. You can refuse an unlawful order, such as shooting an innocent civilian or raping/pillaging. Unfortunately, the average soldier doesn't get to decide that an entire war is "Unlawful". The names of these people, along with their pictures, should be plastered all over the place so that they can hang their heads in shame while their brave brethren go off to war to fight for the freedoms that these shameful deserters won't defend.
Posted by: Craig at December 23, 2004 09:40 PM (b12Jq)
7
I hadn't even realized anyone was deserting and Canada should send them back immediately. From friends I know in Canada, the new govt said no to any troops in Iraq and I know the Canadians were very upset by this. I honestly don't know if Canada actually sent any troops at all, so that's news to me.
Venom: could you not post after every single post someone makes? It sure would be appreciated - I think once is enough.
Cindy
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 24, 2004 01:18 AM (D39Vm)
8
Holy smokes, you're ignorant greyrooster.
First, it was the US military that wanted to award the medals, not some "liberal" politician. Medals to snipers, one of whom still has the longest recorded kill. Don't believe me? Why don't you read this article from Soldier of Fortune?
http://www.stormpages.com/swellal/sof.html
Or how about this one detailing the record kill:
http://www.riflebarrels.com/articles/50calibre/50sniping.htm
"Earning has nothing to do with it." Fuck, you're dense. And incredibly disrespectful. Those soldiers deserved those medals, unless you think saving American lives isn't deserving. Of course, you won't check out either link because that would be admitting you're wrong. Canadian soldiers performed quite admirably. And they're still there. And if you actually KNEW something about the GWOT instead of shit you make up, you'd realize that this contribution by Canada is pretty significant, given the size of the Canadian military.
Is the Canadian government more liberal than the US government? Of course. But that doesn't reflect on the work Canadian troops put in.
Posted by: Venom at December 24, 2004 10:12 AM (dbxVM)
9
Your history of building up anything non American is sickening. As I said long ago, you are as much the enemy as any terrorist.
If you don't think the military is political you are the dense dumb shit. If fact, you probably never served.
I don't read soldier of fortune magazine. Most normal people don't. Of course, you've already shown yourself to be not normal.
The military gave medals to Kerry too. Of course, they later rescended them due to his traitorist mouth. The liberal, peanut farmer Carter allowed him to get them back.
I hold that no one is more deserving than American soldiers.
Your excuses for Canada or (any place other than America) doesn't hold water. Were they half assed in their support in WW2 and Vietnam?
They are ruining their country by allowing unchecked immigration to their country. Then allowing the immigrants to go on the dole and cry about their situation.
The worst part is many of these immigrants end up here.
Canada is becomming nothing but a stepping stone to American. Half the Canadian raghead immigrants end up in Detroit, again on the dole.
Who quit in the middle of the struggle? Canada did. Who deserves the accolades and Medals? Those holding the course. Those that don't waver.Those that don't quit in the middle.
Maybe they should make french their national language. They are on the road to being more french and English.
Canada allowed cowards to hide in their country during the Viet Nam war.
Canada needs to understand that this is not the sixties. America has been attacked at home. Canada harboring deserters should result in action. I say close the border until the deserters are returned in handcuffs.
Have you ever left your apartment?
Does your mommy ever let you out to see the real world?
Posted by: greyrooster at December 24, 2004 11:05 AM (4Pc3X)
10
Man, you are so delusional. I think it's you that doesn't get out enough. Like I figured, you wouldn't check out either link. You liken admitting you're wrong to admitting defeat. It's called learning, and you're so thick-skulled you don't want to peek outside of that self-built cocoon of bullshit you hide in.
Excuse me, and so the fuck what if I see the positives in other countries, as well as America? Canada has its problems and it has its positives. You, on the other hand, find only fault in other countries and no fault in the US. You believe it's unpatriotic to find fault with the US, let alone state it publicly (or, at least, that's the message you're sending in your posts). And, please, enough with the "experience" bullshit, too. Your experience has hardly enlightened you to anything, not based on what you type here. By your rationale, I could stand in the Sistine Chapel, and because I've "experienced" it, I should be an expert on 16th century art.
You don't read soldier of fortune? Well, good for you. Way to back out of a debate. Unfortunately for you, the Soldier of Fortune article has been cited in a number of conservative blogs about the great work the Canadian military (and, specifically, those snipers) has done. I guess you read the other article, huh? Oh, wait, don't answer. I already know you'd much rather hide than read. And we're not talking about who's "more deserving" than others. We're talking about whether the medals are earned. And those Canuck soldiers earned them. You keep thinking I'm trying to tear down America. Please show me in this thread here where I once criticized America. The crux of my argument was to show the good work the Canadian military was doing. You see it (for whatever insane reason) as some kind of attack on America. How do you draw up these conclusions????
"They are ruining their country by allowing unchecked immigration to their country."
More bullshit from you with nothing to back it up. In fact, the procedures to get into Canada are much more stringent since 9/11 (which, incidentally, was perpetrated by people coming through the US immigration system). Unchecked immigration...to you, I'd bet ANY kind of immigration is unchecked.
"Who quit in the middle of the struggle? Canada did."
Nope. How is this possible with troops still stationed in Afghanistan? Doesn't sound like quitting to me. Frankly, Canada couldn't afford to send troops to Iraq, even if it wanted to. And, since you made that comment about only contributing pennies, you wouldn't have been satisfied no matter what Canada contributed, no matter how token it would have been.
"Canada allowed cowards to hide in their country during the Viet Nam war.
Canada needs to understand that this is not the sixties. America has been attacked at home."
That's true, Canada did. So, if this isn't the sixties, why are you trying to relate it to now? Policies of 40 years aren't exactly the same ones being used now. I haven't heard of one American who's been granted asylum in Canada based on the Iraq war. And, in the off chance that it's actually happened, it's not occurred to anywhere near the extent it did 40 years ago. Assuming it's even happened at all.
"Canada harboring deserters should result in action."
I said this from the beginning.
Posted by: Venom at December 24, 2004 11:57 AM (dbxVM)
11
Their all traitors and deserters they can go live in canada if they want to and phooie on them they are no better then the lowlifes who did it during vietnam and that includes bill clinton
Posted by: sandpiper at December 24, 2004 03:06 PM (fvObb)
12
VENOM AND GREYROOSTER: TAKE IT OUTSIDE!!!!
When you read a post - one comment along is enough and I mean ENOUGH ALREADY! YOU TWO WANT TO DUKE IT OUT, DO IT ON YOUR OWN TIME AND THROUGH EMAIL IF NECESSARY, NOT HERE. AND THERE IS NO NEED OF SWEARING EITHER. So guys, growup.
This posts talks about deserters going to Canada. I didn't know of anyone deserting and going to Canada so it's news to me. New news. I don't think it's right - especially if you are already in the military; the article doesn't say, so I'm just assuming it's military personnel. And for them to leave their units and go to Canada is wrong and now that they've done it, they should stay there because if they can't stand up for their own country, then they have no right to live in it. It's that simple.
I'm glad you listed the names; that was a good idea. Hopefully if they ever try to return and get a job, someone will recognize their names and fire them immediately. If these names are military men, I hope they get court-martialed when and if they come back to the US. WE do not need people that unreliable in our country or our workforce; they have no right to it by leaving it when they were needed most. Canada can either said them back and be jailed or they can keep them with the word these men will never return to the United States. It's not our loss; it's theirs.
Cindy
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 26, 2004 07:53 PM (D39Vm)
13
Uh, I don't have a dog in this fight, Cindy, but I would like to point out that what those two are doing is commonly known as "dialogue." Your admonition about ONE POST! is senseless, since you yourself have 2 or 3 in this one thread. Discussion entails more than a serial sequence of monologues where each "participant" gets his say with no other opportunity for input. From my impartial view, while these two guys cussed a bit, it wasn't as bad as Rusty gets at times, and they still presented their views somewhat rationally. All-in-all this is an entertaining and informative thread. Let the guys (and girls, perhaps) have their say.
Posted by: skh at December 26, 2004 09:22 PM (0xwoN)
14
skh
you haven't had to put up with them on all the subjects, most in archives now where there are like 86 reponses back and forth. It is not dialogue - it's arguments back and forth. So yes, they should indeed take it outside. People are getting tired of it and at least, I'm opening my mouth and have the courage to say so. You haven't been here, so you have no idea. One comment per post is enough - these guys never end, so let them do it by email to each other and not here. If you've been a reader here from the very beginning, you'd know exactly why I said what I said. I've been part of this site for almost a year now, so unless you want that particular post to have them go back and forth 100 times, you'd say what I did say. One comment is enough; these guys go over the line.
Cindy
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 26, 2004 09:33 PM (D39Vm)
15
I've had a few back-and-forths here myself. While I haven't been here from the beginning, I've been around a while. It's exactly those "you must be out of your fucking mind!" threads that are the most enjoyable to read. Seriously. If a blog was so dry that it only provoked a couple of comments per post then the number of visitors would likely plummet. I'm not trying to start a flame war or anything, but Venom and greyrooster are both responding to each other with more than simple insults and profanity...they are both presenting more information as the thread develops. I don't believe that they are to the point where they are about to resort to digital kung-fu ("Where do you live? I'll come over to your house and beat your ass like a $2 drum.") and, like I said, it IS entertaining to read their responses. And, neither one of them is a troll who makes a one line insulting comment and disappears. If visitors were limited to one comment per post, you and I couldn't be having this conversation...and I wouldn't be able to say that it's good to meet you!
Posted by: skh at December 27, 2004 07:30 AM (0xwoN)
16
First of all Crowing Grey Rooster Its not early morning adnd we dont need you to wake us up. If your going to try and open our eyes then do so with knowledge, French is also our national language we share our nationality and our contry as peaceful law abiding proud citizens. Not justifying murdering of women and children in Iraq, I think some new young rooster needs to take your post and spread seeds of understanding to feed the rest of the flock. As yours seem to be stale but then again when your a greying rooster I must consider the mind get feeble with age.
Foreverfree Proud Canadian.
Posted by: I am Canadian at January 01, 2005 05:47 AM (agqCk)
17
First of all Crowing Grey Rooster Its not early morning and we dont need you to wake us up. If your going to try and open our eyes then do so with knowledge, French is also our national language we share our nationality and our country as peaceful law abiding proud citizens. Not justifying murdering of women and children in Iraq, I think some new young rooster needs to take your post and spread seeds of understanding to feed the rest of the flock. As yours seem to be stale but then again when your a greying rooster I must consider the mind gets feeble with age.
Foreverfree Proud Canadian.
Posted by: I am Canadian at January 01, 2005 05:48 AM (agqCk)
18
Proud of what? Your inability to make a post correctly?
There is a young greyrooster. He is in Iraq fighting with the men not hugging the cowardly French.
Posted by: greyrooster at January 01, 2005 01:28 PM (VsBCt)
19
FIRSTBROKENANGEL: If you wish to be a moderator. Start your own blog!
Tell everyone to be nice. No cussing. Lots of hugging. See how many comments are made.
Posted by: greyrooster at January 01, 2005 01:32 PM (VsBCt)
20
i have a penis in my bum
Posted by: pooty tang at April 19, 2005 09:27 PM (25oj1)
21
the usa hands out medals like candy,but these guys deserve your repect.
A world-record killing shot by a Canadian sniper detachment in Afghanistan could never have been made with the ammunition they were issued when they left Edmonton last winter, the triggerman said in a recent interview. The Canadian .50-calibre rounds have a maximum range of between 2,200 and 2,300 metres.
But the U.S. rounds, they discovered, "fly farther, faster," said Cpl. "Bill", a 26-year-old native of Fogo Island, Nfld.
The two-man Canadian team, coupled with American Sgt. Zevon Durham of Greenville, S.C., made the kill from 2,430 metres, or nearly 2 1/2 kilometres, on the second shot.
This feat is the equivalent of standing at the foot of Yonge St. and hitting a target in the intersection of Yonge and Wellesley Sts., just north of College St.
The first shot blew a bag from the hand of their target, an Al Qaeda fighter walking on a road.
"He didn't even flinch," said Bill, who spoke on condition that his real name not be used.
"We made a correction and the next round hit exactly where we wanted it to. Well, a bit to the right."
The kill, one of more than 20 unofficially accredited to Canadian snipers during Operation Anaconda in Afghanistan's Shah-i-Kot Valley, beat the 35-year-old record of 2,500 yards, or 2,250 metres, set by U.S. Marine Gunnery Sgt. Carlos Hathcock in Duc Pho, South Vietnam.
Soldier of Fortune magazine estimated the number of kills made by the Canadians after talking to several U.S. soldiers in Kandahar for a cover story in its August edition.
The snipers themselves will not confirm the figure.
But judging from accounts given by Canadians involved in the first major coalition offensive of the Afghan war, the figure of at least 20 sounds conservative.
The 800-strong 3rd battalion of the Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry is pulling out this month.
They'll first go through a reintegration process on the Pacific island of Guam before heading home to Edmonton.
About 100 British Royal Marines, too, wrapped up their last combat mission in Afghanistan yesterday after four months in Afghanistan.
The five Canadian snipers, outfitted with British desert fatigues and an array of equipment from all over the world, were divided into two detachments that earned the respect of their American brothers-in-arms after helping rescue dozens of paratroopers pinned down by enemy fire.
The five have been nominated for one of the highest awards given by the United States military - the Bronze Star, two of them with Vs for Valour, marking exceptional bravery.
Awarding of the American medal, which was to have been done at a ceremony along with other Anaconda veterans in Kandahar in April, has been delayed by Canadian protocol officials.
But more important to the Canadians are the gestures from their American brethren who - while nearly killing them several times over with "friendly fire" - owe many lives to their shooting skills.
"They trusted us to do our job, without question," said Master Cpl. "James," a 31-year-old native of Kingsville, Ont., who like Cpl. Bill asked that his identity not be revealed.
At one point during a series of battles, one of the Canadians was without his rifle. Enemy bullets were hitting the earth all around. Mortars were dropping in front and behind them, some within 10 metres, bracketing their position and getting closer all the time. "They really hammered us," said Bill. He tried to get to their rifles but couldn't. Finally, an American sniper tossed him his rifle and said: "Here, you know how to use this better than I do."
They held off the enemy until darkness descended and escaped.
"They were instrumental in helping us achieve our goals out there," said 1st Lieut. Justin Overbaugh, 25, of Missoula, Mont., the soldier who recommended Bill and James for Bronze Stars.
"They are professionals; they are very good at what they do; they train hard, they are very mature, they are tactically and technically proficient so when it came time to do business, they were on," he said. "If they told me I was going out right now, I'd be begging, kicking, screaming, crying for them to come with us."
Bill and James said they pulled off several shots from 2,400 metres or more.
"Shots out that far are 60 per cent skill and 40 per cent luck, or vice versa," said Bill. "Usually, it takes two or three rounds, sometimes five. "Normally, a sniper wouldn't take that many shots, but they were out so far we felt confident they couldn't tell where we were."
One morning, the two Canadians were set up overlooking a compound when Al Qaeda fighters started "pouring out of buildings like ants." Bill started shooting while James called in a mortar attack, followed by B-52, F-16 and Apache helicopter strikes.
In a separate incident, Bill and James found themselves looking up at a large dark object screaming out of the sky directly above them - a 220-kilogram American bomb.
"We hit the deck and covered our heads with our hands," said James. The bomb landed 30 metres away, nose in, and never went off.
"By the grace of God, it was a dud," said Bill. "It landed 15 metres from the B company (U.S. 101st Airborne Division) trenches. A guy got up, walked out of the trench and kicked the thing."
Capt. Paul Madej, Operation Enduring Freedom chaplain, who debriefed the Canadians, described them: "The Canadian snipers are professional, well-trained soldiers who walked into harm's way and fulfilled their mission. They represent the best and they have our respect."
With files from Associated Press
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by: john at May 15, 2005 08:56 PM (AXyBz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Syria Housing Saddam Loyalists
-
Times Online
IRAQ has confronted Syria with evidence indicating that senior Syrian officials have been assisting the Iraqi insurgency, it emerged yesterday.
The evidence includes photographs of Syrian officials taken from Iraqi fighters captured during the offensive against Fallujah last month.
US Marines in Fallujah also found a hand-held global-positioning system receiver with waypoints originating in western Syria and the names of four Syrians in a list of 27 foreign fighters contained in a ledger.
Hassan Allawi, Iraq’s newly appointed Ambassador to Syria, told The Times in Damascus: “Prime Minister Iyad Allawi wrote a letter to the Syrians saying he had the pictures but was not going to release them despite being under pressure from the Americans to do so.”
Mr Allawi said the photographs were found in the possession of Moayed Ahmed Yasseen, also known as Abu Ahmed, leader of the Jaish Muhammad group composed of former Baathist intelligence personnel. One picture showed Mr Yasseen standing beside a senior Syrian official, he said. Mr Yasseen was arrested in Fallujah in mid-November.
There have been numerous reports indicating Syrian involvement in the insurgency inside of Iraq. Last week
Syrian intelligence officials were captured in Najaf aiding the insurgency. The story indicating Syria's housing of Saddam loyalists inside of Syria has been
documented before, however there are no pictures which would provide guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Radical Islamic mosques in Western Syria indoctrinate terrorists from all over the Middle East and
Europe before they are sent into Iraq to fight the Coallition and Iraqi soldiers/citizens.
Syrian government officials fear Democracy inside of the Middle East and Iraq specifically because the idea alone has caused protests by the citizens of Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Iran already. Syria remains the one bordering country of Iraq where the people have not had a protest in favor of Democracy, though part of this could be the massive suppression by the Syrian government.
Syria has been, and still is, a thorn in the side of the United States, the Iraqi people and the entire civilized world through funding, supporting, indoctrinating and arming terrorists hell-bent on forming a radical Islamic state of Iraq. Before the U.S. invasion of Iraq, there were 18 trucks seen by satellite crossing the border from Iraq to Syria which allegedly carried any remaining WMD stockpiles left in Iraq. Of course the content of those trucks is in question, however the Syrian support of the terrorist acts in Iraq cannot be questioned.
Cross-posted at In the Bullpen
Posted by: Chad at
01:34 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 424 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Syrian Involvement in Iraq.
Not quiet sure why you are getting so excited about Syria or for that matter Iran. The bottom line is the US and UK are over committed with the operation in Iraq. Neither the US or UK have the military/financial capability to can pose a credible threat to either country, whilst still stuck in Iraq.
The Syrians and Iranians know this so a bit of meddling and turning a blind eye to what people are doing whilst transiting through to Iraq is the equivalent of the US policy of pre-emptive strike, but to protect their countries/political interests.
As another ‘nasty’ regime, which has never been good friends with Iraq, Syria is wise get the Mil Intel people talking to the insurgents. Because:
a. It is always wise to know who you are helping and understand their networks. Perhaps if the CIA had not sub-contracted that role to the Pakistani ISID, the US might have known what the Mujaheeden's ideology and key players whilst OBL was developing Al Quaida.
b. It is also wise to understand your enemy, lets face it Syria is quasi-Communist State. Their government does not like Islamic Terrorists much more that the US does, however, being weak it stays allied to these groups whilst they serve a purpose and then will liquidate them (if they can) once they are no longer useful. A classic Communist Tactic! They did a good job the last time Islamic extremists tried to take over.
c. If and when Iraq is back on its feet, Iraq and Syria are likely to be Mortal enemies. Therefore, having good contact with organisation within Iraq is wise.
Meanwhile, Iran is building nukes and the Syrians are busy trying to learn from Iraq, how to fight the US if they invade and more importantly avoiding getting invaded in the first place. The easiest way is to facilitate insurgency in Iraq.
DemocracyÂ…Â…!
As for democracy.....the last country that tried this was Algeria, the FIS would have won but the Army took over; net result another military dictatorship and a ten year struggle to defeat Islamic fighters. In those ten years Algerians turned up in Afghanistan, France, Bosnia, Chechnya and now Iraq. The recruiting videos from Algeria are impressive they were found in a Mosque in the UK and aired on TV impressive.
State Sponsorship of Terrorism.
As for Assad and Syria being state sponsors of terrorism, well yes they are. One should be very careful not to bracket all Islamic terrorists in one bundle. The 'old fashioned' Palestinian terrorist was motivated by Political (Left Wing) Dogma and a nationalist desire to 'defend' their country. Hezbollah and other Shia Terrorist groups are either fighting to extend the Iranian Theological Philosophy or in Pakistan to fight against radical Sunni Muslims. Then their are the broad brush Al Quaida and affiliated groups who are determined to extend the Wahabi movement from beyond the borders of Saudi Arabia, and more immediately remove the US (and other infidels) Saudi Arabia.
Posted by: Jailor at December 23, 2004 07:16 AM (fw1t4)
2
Not bad Jailor, not bad. However, are we/you complicating the matter. While I agree against invading I do not agree we should let it pass. We do not have to invade using large ammounts of troops to get our point across to Syria. We have the means and capabilites to punish after due warning. Our military machine is not great at occupation (care too much) but there is none better at winning battles. A good butt whipping without invasion may prove worthwhile.
A message to those who don't believe we mean what we say.
Posted by: greyrooster at December 23, 2004 11:11 AM (visY3)
3
Both Syria and Iran have been assisting the terrorists from the very beginning; both borders are wired and manned by US Forces - most of the time they're bored to death - now winter is upon them, so the chore is going to get harder.
Cindy
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 24, 2004 01:23 AM (D39Vm)
4
I don't know - as I said before; Bin Laden's remarks towards Saudi Arabia......
Cindy
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 24, 2004 01:29 AM (D39Vm)
5
Saudi Arabia will be the place of the next revolution. The Royal family will fall. Just a matter of time. We should quit worrying about the house of Saud and start now to win the hearts and minds of the people. Catering to the Royal family will not do it. Revolution will start and the Islamofacists know it. They will gain the support of the people by helping the revolution while the west sits on its thumbs until too late. Then by force of arms and terror they will take over the country. It has started now. Bin Lauden has noticed the sitution and will take advantage of it. Remember Iran? We learned nothing in our support for the shah.
The majority of the 9/11 attackers were Saudis. One of the reasons they hate us is our support for the Royal family. Approximately 6000 members of the Royal family have 98% of the wealth of the country. This cannot remain. It's a carrot dangling in front of the Islamic Fundalmentalists. Saudi Arabia as is,is history. Just a matter of time. Are we smart enough to see the situation and present a counter in time? Doubt it.
Posted by: greyrooster at December 24, 2004 11:29 AM (4Pc3X)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 22, 2004
Schuer on Al Qaeda Tapes
-
Time
Michael Scheuer, an al-Qaeda analyst who recently retired from the CIA and once headed its bin Laden unit, tells TIME he believes that in their series of recent messages and tapes, bin Laden and al-Zawahiri have been subtly addressing criticism from some Muslim clerics that the Sept. 11 attacks violated Islamic edicts against surprise attacks. "The Prophet's guidance," says Scheuer, "was always, Before you attack someone, warn them very clearly and offer them a chance to convert to Islam." He contends that bin Laden, by making his warnings very explicit, has "done everything that's required" so that, in his mind, "the criticisms he got after 9/11 won't be valid this time around." Adds Scheuer: "I think what he's done is clearly set the stage for a large attack."
Scheuer says he was particularly alarmed by the video of al-Zawahiri, aired Nov. 29 on the Arabic TV network al-Jazeera, in which he offered a "final piece of advice for America ... You must choose between two ways of behaving toward Muslims: either you deal with them on the basis of respect and mutual interest or you treat them as easy prey." Scheuer says, "What bothered me is he said this is the 'final' time we're going to raise this. I had not seen them ever before say, This is the end of this discussion we're having with you." If al-Zawahiri intended his message to be a last warning to the U.S., bin Laden's latest could be seen as a corollary shift in focus toward the Muslim world.
When the pre-election
Osama Bin Laden video was released, I noticed a change in the demeanor of Bin Laden. At the end of November, Ayman Al-Zawahri appeared on a
video tape showing the same sort of transformation. Last Thursday (December 16, 2004) Bin Laden released an
audio tape with the exact same type of demeanor he used in the video tape.
The demeanor of all three was one of a diplomat rather than a terrorist. In all three tapes, I noted how both Bin Laden and Al-Zawahri were changing tactics from terrorists to diplomats in an effort to gain support not only in the Middle East, but the media and the rest of the world as well. What I had not done is piece together their appeals to the world with the post-9/11 reaction from Islamic clerics criticizing the attack.
In hindsight though, I do distinctly remember several Islamic clerics and nations condemning the attack because there was no warning, but only a few that condemned the attack period. In fact, Bin Laden's "personal" cleric condemned the attack based upon no warning or reaching out towards America.
Schuer, the author of 'Anonymous,' does have some credibility issues however he still remains probably the most knowledgable person in the intelligence community when it comes to Bin Laden. Whether or not his analysis concerning a future attack is correct, only time will tell. According to Schuer on a 60 Minutes interview, Bin Laden has been given clearence to launch a nuclear attack on U.S. cities. The question remains though whether or not Al Qaeda has either the weaponry or the ability to do so.
Cross-posted at In the Bullpen
Posted by: Chad at
09:40 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 545 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Nothing would make me happier than to watch a bullet go through the skulls of Zawahiri and UBL. Their attempt to curry favor with the MSM and liberals who they will convince that hugs and love are the answer, only to later light off a dirty bomb next to them.
Ann Coulter was right, we should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. These guys are like the Necromongers from "The Chronicles of Riddick." Convert or Die.
I do not intend to convert, even if they give me a warning of their next attack. I am giving them a warning; soldiers like me are coming. We are coming and we do not forget. You will never be able to show your faces anywhere in the civilized world without being shot.
You are Marked Men. Behold the face of our vengeance. No God will protect you....
Posted by: Dave at December 23, 2004 01:03 AM (xfI1/)
2
Hi Chad, I just finished reading this interview with Scheur
http://www.worldpress.org/Americas/1996.cfm
before I read your post. The interview was annoying although the analysis of the tapes may be correct.
Posted by: Jane at December 23, 2004 10:06 AM (6krEN)
3
I do believe we will experience another horrific attack. Only the Islamic countries, clergy and people can stop it. The Islamic fanatics are spawned by these countries and people. Their religion is the root cause.
Our main deterrent should be there will be retribution against any and all Islamic nations.
We may suffer the day of the attack, but the entire muslim world will suffer the day after.
Let them live with the same fear and see if they dance in the streets this time.
Clean your own house or you will not have one.
We will not stand for any more attacks.
Posted by: greyrooster at December 23, 2004 11:33 AM (visY3)
4
Get a grip on yourself man!
This is no time to get hysterical
-------
unnnh... clem
Posted by: Unnnnnh.... Clem. at December 23, 2004 06:02 PM (WdSoH)
5
Interesting interview Jane. Thanks for the information.
Posted by: Chad at December 23, 2004 07:58 PM (TX/e5)
6
Unnnnnh....Clem. No instead we should be calm and again take it in the ear. Just hope its yours and not mine on the end the pretty damn sure in will happen attack. If it is remain calm. Don't get hysterical.
Posted by: greyrooster at December 23, 2004 09:47 PM (visY3)
7
the longer we fight this war with one hand on our weapon and the other around our balls. The longer and costly it will be. We have no strategy for winning. We do not have the leadership in place to win this war. We do have the leaders but they are not functional or allowed to be so. I feel for any american soldier or other who has to got to iraq and deal with this situation. The real sad part is that the sons of those politicians who have us there are not in the military. If they were perhaps this major issue would be resolved quicker since it would personally affect them. Those getting killed do not generate enough politics for us to get out. Maybe now with this slaughter in the mess hall, more will be able to see te light through the bull shit and realize that we are going nowhere fast. We need to get out of Iraq now...
Posted by: gr at December 24, 2004 10:03 AM (GyoP1)
8
Chad, do you remember right after 9/11 there were audios and videos showing bin laden and his cronies estatic over bringing down their plans? I remember bin laden saying he didn't realize the planes would bring the buildings down like that but was thrilled with that result - he was even hand gesturing. I even found tapes taken my al-qaeda from a distance watching it happening on tape, as they tape everything they do, and these tapes got back into his hands.
Yes their demeanor was different this time and I think they were basically warning Saudi Arabia as the next big place to attack. Also I thought their coloring was grayish because they are obviously in hiding and not outside much and that can change your whole attitude never mind your coloring. Something is up, don't know what and do not know if Bin Laden is involved in any of it. It could be he's trying to be the top dog again, something he's not at this time. But something is definitely up but who, when or where is the real crux of the matter. Personally, I hope it stays over there than here.
Cindy
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 26, 2004 09:45 PM (D39Vm)
9
I do remember the tapes right after 9/11 and I have re-read many of the communiques left by Al Qaeda during that time. I maintain that Bin Laden isn't trying to necessarily gain power back, but he wants to further his ideology. In order to do this he will try to appear as more of a diplomat rather than a terrorist who has thousands of innocent's blood on his hands.
This has happened before and the world ate it up. The most glaring example of this happening before just died about a month or so ago. He was a terrorist throughout his life yet was also cheered by people world-wide as a diplomat.
This is the only thing that concerns me. I could care less whether or not he makes threats, but I am concerned the media will turn Bin Laden into a media darling in 20 years. Will we be the few that realize Bin Laden is nothing more than an opportunistic killer?
Posted by: Chad at December 26, 2004 10:00 PM (8wuYC)
10
You guys keep assuming an attack is going to happen!!! Osama Bin Laden IS DEAD. Ask Israel. Al Qae'da are no longer functional as a choerent, organised terrorist network. And, for crying out loud, we have given up enough civil liberties you'd have thought that the CIA would have a hold on nutjob Islamic terrorists.
Do not fear Islam. Fear yourselves; fear fear because it is stealing your freedom.
Posted by: Ravin THambapillai at March 02, 2005 10:22 AM (F1nba)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Anti-Texan Bigotry
This is just sad. Yes, anti-Texan bigotry is everywhere and I have
documented it before, but come on now.
NEW YORK - Yeehaw! MTV's "The Real World" is headed to Austin, Texas. "We've been thinking about Austin for a long time," co-creator and executive producer Jon Murray told The Associated Press Wednesday.
Well saddle my britches, slap my cow Betsy and call it a day. Austin is about as cowboy as San Francisco is to Conservative. Why must people continue to believe everyone in Texas is a cowboy and screams out yeehaw? I believe the last time I heard that came from someone (no names) from New Jersey. Or was that yeeeaaaghh?
Update:
Fearing a Texas-charged lawsuit, the Associated Press has changed the lead paragraph.
NEW YORK - Dude! MTV's "The Real World" is headed to Austin, Texas. "We've been thinking about Austin for a long time," co-creator and executive producer Jon Murray told The Associated Press Wednesday.
Notice the change from Yeehaw to Dude.
Cross-posted at In the Bullpen
Posted by: Chad at
05:13 PM
| Comments (22)
| Add Comment
Post contains 174 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I know, sigh. I'm a native New Yawker myself, and my friends and family STILL think we're breaking in horses and milking the cows!
Either that, or they think that all the women are like Sue Ellen and all the men like J.R.!!
Posted by: Laura at December 22, 2004 06:13 PM (ptOpl)
2
Anti-Texan Bigotry is everywhere. My son said something with a Southern accent last night and then said that there's my Texas slang. I wanted to kick him. He heard it on a commercial.
Most irritating it is!
Posted by: AuntiCraker at December 22, 2004 06:21 PM (z8xeH)
3
True, true! My wife is from a small town in East Texas, and has a much heavier accent than I, who grew up in a city in Central Texas. She literally did have an oil well in her back yard, but there were none where I grew up. I wasn't part of the FFA or owned a huge belt buckle, wore boots or even owned a cowboy hat. But I love Texas, I love the Texas spirit, and, well, I love Texas! I noticed that there are very few other states where the people love their state and want to settle there, heck most want to get out. However most Texans can't get enough, of well, Texas!
Craig
(Only seven references to Texas in this post.)
Posted by: Craig at December 22, 2004 06:55 PM (b12Jq)
4
Oh, and yeah, I have to admit I hate Austin, so it is fitting that MTV picked it, since I also hate MTV (Sixth Street, that it is cool though).
Craig
(Disclaimer : Writer graduated from Texas A&M)
Posted by: Craig at December 22, 2004 06:58 PM (b12Jq)
5
I don't mind Austin because it is a fun town, but it's the Liberal part of Texas. Of course there's nothing wrong with that, but when you spent five years out in Lubbock, TX (city with the most churches per capita in the U.S.) Austin is like another world.
The problem with the media elite ragging on Texas is that they are just jealous we can use the phrases Texas-sized, ya'll and y'ant to without hesitation or embarassment. When they use it they sound like an outsider trying to either fit in or poke fun.
Actually, I don't think I've ever used two of those three phrases out of a joking context.
Posted by: Chad at December 22, 2004 07:47 PM (4wE0H)
6
"Texas? Only steers and queers come from Texas"
Gunnery Sgt. Hartman, from Full Metal Jacket
Directions to get to Texas from North Carolina: Go west until you smell shit, go south until you step in it.
Posted by: Mr. K at December 22, 2004 07:59 PM (TsG5r)
7
MTV? Do they have television in Texas?
Posted by: Leopold Stotch at December 22, 2004 08:03 PM (bkiWv)
8
People hate Texans for the same reason they hate Californians. We are too damn proud and love our states too damn much. That said the only good time I had in Texas was getting drunk after getting a speeding ticket at a bar in Odessa and watching cowboys, well basically watching their scrotums due to the tightness of their jeans, flip girls around. I wasn't impressed.
Posted by: Wittysexkitten at December 22, 2004 11:17 PM (Mv/yq)
9
They don't even wanna go there with me.
Posted by: iggy at December 23, 2004 08:22 AM (1Z4Aq)
10
Considering how many times I've heard Texans refer to the US as "Texas and the 49 lesser states", I'd advise you to be careful chucking rocks from your glass houses. There's an equal amount of evidence that Texans have an anti-unTexan bias.
Posted by: Brian B at December 23, 2004 11:39 AM (CouWh)
11
Where is a better place to live?
Posted by: greyrooster at December 23, 2004 11:56 AM (visY3)
12
Greyrooster:
I'd take my home state over Texas any day. As a matter of fact, I loved living here enough to give up a good job and a balmy climate to move back. I've been to Texas, I was underwhelmed.
Posted by: Brian B at December 23, 2004 01:24 PM (CouWh)
13
Why has a post intended for humor turned into a state pissing contest? Lighten up people. Texans aren't your enemy. It's those damn
North Dakotians!
Posted by: Chad at December 23, 2004 01:28 PM (D4h/n)
14
What state would that be Brian?
Posted by: iggy at December 23, 2004 03:55 PM (1Z4Aq)
15
Iggy,
I'm an Oregonian, and I have the webbed feet to prove it.
Posted by: Brian B at December 23, 2004 06:29 PM (CouWh)
16
Brian B: Surely you must be kidding. I thought you guys were starving to death. Anyway, that's what Californians think. Why else would so many of you move south?
My thoughts. San Antone east is Okay. West Texas you can keep. I prefer green.
West Oregon is Okay. You can keep eastern Oregon. Taters, Onions and desert. Except for Farewell Bend which I find enchanting.
I guess Oregon is Okay. If anything is going on to make more than just making it.
Posted by: greyrooster at December 23, 2004 10:07 PM (visY3)
17
On second thought the Williamette Valley is beautiful. Coos bay has great fishing. Bend Oregon was a great vacation place (haven't been their in years). Crater lake at dawn is fabulous. Port Orsford is neat when the fog is in. Medford is pretty and the trout fishing is unbelievable. Rouge River is one of a kind.
Have to rethink my previous post.
Posted by: greyrooster at December 23, 2004 10:15 PM (visY3)
18
Greyrooster,
Yeah, the economy here sucks, but it's picking up. We could spend a whole thread on the reasons for that. If you're gonna make the economic health of a state the sole criterion for judgubg it,hell, I'd give Texas props over us in a heartbeat. But for natural beauty, it's hard to beat. And the cool thing is, except for maybe Hawaii, you can name any state in the Union and I'll show you part of Oregon that will remind you of it.
I prefer green too, which is why I love it here. There are parts of Eastern Oregon that are beautiful and fascinating. Like Paleontology? Try the John Day Fossil Beds. The Bend area has some kick-ass skiing, but it's considered Central Oregon, not Eastern. The Wallowa mountains in the northeast corner remind a lot of people of the alps, very sharp, steep, and craggy.
As for more than making it, that's subjective. We have a saying up here, "Pay me in scenery." From the freeway I frive on to and from work each day, you can see a mountain (The Three Sisters) that has snow year round. You can take a city bus to the McKenzie, one of the best fly fishing rivers in the country. a half hour drive puts me in the middle of the forest. And, most importantly, it's where I was born. For others, if you love your home state as much asI do mine, more power to you, and Irespec that, but don't pity me just because I'm not there. This is where i'm happy.
The Wilamette valley (where I live now) is OK, but it's too flat for my tastes. I grew up in roseburg, which is in souther Oregon, a more mountainous region (though we always called them "hills", I'm told they're mountains). You pegged it on the other descriptions, and I'd say that Crater Lake is the most beautiful spot inthe state. Amazing how blue the water is. Bend's become an even bigger vacation destination, especially if you ski or golf.
Posted by: Brian B at December 25, 2004 12:10 PM (Mg1Kn)
19
Dude is definitely more accurate the yeehaw in Austin.
Much more of a hippie culture here.
Posted by: austin at December 26, 2004 04:44 AM (QUoOh)
20
I've heard tales of how liberal Austin is. To be honestly self-critical, I have a hard time believing it could be as bad as Berkeley-on-the-Willamette, aka Eugene.
Posted by: Brian B at December 27, 2004 07:35 PM (CouWh)
21
Well howdy,
coming from Toyah Texas (very small town), I can say that most Texans are really not the cowboys people say they are. As for me, I may really be a cowboy in my ranch but who cares? There are cowboys in Chily and Mexico, doesn't men they all say Yee Haa now does it? I do though ... but hey, everything's bigger in Texas and no state is friendlier and nicer! Y'all be good now y'hear?
Posted by: Arthemis A at December 30, 2004 02:44 AM (MWj+k)
22
Here is an interesting thought, my fiance is an Aussie. I fianlly took him to Texas (Dallas and all around the Austin area). He said he had never been anywhere that reminded him more of Australia- in attitude and places. (however we didnt get to hit the Rio Grande Valley...which I still think is in another dimension)
Posted by: andrea at May 18, 2005 07:59 AM (kuolt)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Sue Wal-Mart
We should all sue Wal-Mart. Why you ask? For one they
sold an album with the 'F' word on it that enraged parents then they had the audacity of following the gun laws in Texas but are getting
sued by the parents of a girl who committed suicide.
You know you want to sue Wal-Mart. Everyone's doing it and a lawsuit doesn't always have to make sense.
Posted by: Chad at
02:43 PM
| Comments (19)
| Add Comment
Post contains 71 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yes and poor $zillionaire John Edwards will need some work.
Rod Stanton
Cerritos
Posted by: Rod Stanton at December 22, 2004 04:56 PM (tHUgl)
2
One has to remember most of these frivolous lawsuits are pushed by attorneys on consignment. Hoping for a settlement by companies who don't wish the cost of defense. Right or wrong has little to do with it. Cost of defense, bad publicity, verses cost of settlement.
If consignment attorneys where held responsible for court courts of frivolous lawsuits it would slow up quick.
Posted by: greyrooster at December 23, 2004 12:13 PM (visY3)
3
can I sue Wal-Mart for accepting a stolen and forged check on my account? They carded the MAN and even wrote HIS DL number on my check. Obviously it was a woman's check and it was just one check torn out of the book. It was for over $100.
***identity theft victim...
Posted by: jb at February 07, 2005 02:14 PM (CTiwU)
4
I want to sue walmart for a situation that took place to me that caused me to lose integrity in the community and then completely was found to be unsubstantiated. I do not have money to file a civil suit and do not know how to go about it.
How do you find consignment attorneys?
Can someone tell me how to go about suing walmart.
Posted by: Jim at February 15, 2005 06:54 PM (ntbOT)
5
My son slashed both his wrist in a walmart super center. Had the knives not been in an isle my son would not have lost use of both his hands. He has depression issues. I was talking to a former walmart manager that said We indeed do have the right to sue walmart. The knives shouldnt have been out at all. any ideas?
Posted by: Tyson at April 23, 2005 10:40 PM (OWcWc)
6
I'm suing Wal-Mart for carding me when I handed them a signed Visa Debit Card. The refused the sale and evicted me from the store. I am asking for $30,000,000.00 . It is agaist the Visa policy to card customers that present a signed Visa Card. Other retailer don't ask for ID! Wal-mart will harrass every customer in an attempt to stop theft. It's downright wrong!
Posted by: Hillberry vs. Wal-Mart at May 01, 2005 06:22 PM (VAOnZ)
7
Well, it sounds like a bunch of spoiled children here. I cannot believe Hillberry vs. Wal-Mart is tring to sue Walmart for requesting id when using a VISA. I suppose the nimrod would rather lose the VISA and have someone else use it illegally at Walmart. They card you for your protection!!! Get off your drugs and use your brain to reason out reality!!!
Posted by: Reason at May 13, 2005 05:04 PM (lZQfO)
8
"Well, it sounds like a bunch of spoiled children here. I cannot believe Hillberry vs. Wal-Mart is tring to sue Walmart for requesting id when using a VISA. I suppose the nimrod would rather lose the VISA and have someone else use it illegally at Walmart. They card you for your protection!!! Get off your drugs and use your brain to reason out reality!!!"
Posted by someone who calls him or herself reason-what a joke!
If you were reasonable, then you would expect big corporations to follow the same LAWS and CONTRACTS that the rest of us average citizens must follow. THe fact that you are so dumb as to not understand that it is VIsa that protects the customer against losses as their millions of commericals tell you. Walmart in asking for identification is only trying to protect themselves and to hell with the customers rights. I would advise you to check out some of the Visa commerical which pushes you to use their card for the sole selling point of NO ID REQUIRED as opposed to writing a check, which requires one.
Since you are a name caller, and one who calls names when they do not even know what they are talking about, leads me to believe that you are a flat out stupid a**. You probably believed Bush when he said Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, and worse, probably still believe it in light of the fact that there is now evidence showing that Bush didn't care if he had weapons, he was starting the war anyway!
Let me clue you in on something Trailer Park homie, if you looked at the documents on that website, like I did, you would see that Wal-Mart is pushing super hard with all the tricks to get the suit dismissed. I also wrote the guy and learned that Walmart was willing to settle if he would sign an agreement not to tell anyone else that it was illegal. He declined.
So YOU get off the drugs and appreciate that someone has the balls to fight for the rights of idiots like you, who frankly are't deserving of such rights to begin with. HAH, your so dumb that you give yours away.
I know that you probably do very little real reading, but look on google for a sample merchant agreement (like the one Walmart signed) and it is clear that retailers who card are breaking the contract. Now if you rent an apartment and break the lease, you get sued! Why shouldn't Walmart be treated just like every other lawbreaker?
Posted by: Veronica at June 03, 2005 09:14 AM (VAOnZ)
9
Julie Doering Pierce..."The Walmart Way" Not Sam's Way...Walmart XIII AD
www.walmartassociatescentral.com
Posted by: julie pierce at June 19, 2005 09:02 AM (M7kiy)
10
wal-mart didn't pay me last check after i was fired. it's been 2mths now still no check..what should i do?
Posted by: Aaron Samuel at June 21, 2005 08:32 AM (8+oMz)
Posted by: Dish Network Promo at June 27, 2005 10:11 PM (X7KLM)
Posted by: Free Dish Network Installation at June 27, 2005 10:12 PM (X7KLM)
13
MY MOTHER WORKED AT WAL MART AND TRIPPED OVER A CO WORKER AROUND THE COUNTER ON THE FLOOR MEASURING SHELFS DURING THE RUSH HOUR. SHE BROKE BOTH HER ARMS, SHE JUST GET WORKMAN COMP, I THINK SHE SHOULD BE COMPENSATED FOR ALL THE TORTURE SHE HAS BEEN THROUGH. SHE CAN NOT EVEN BATH HER SELF, MY SIBLINGS AND MYSELF HAVE TAKEN TIME OFF WORK TO HELP HER, THIS IS GETTING HARD.AND WORKMAN COMP DONT EVEN COVER HER BILLS.
Posted by: mary at June 29, 2005 07:38 AM (LcOvq)
14
MY MOTHER WORKED AT WAL MART AND TRIPPED OVER A CO WORKER AROUND THE COUNTER ON THE FLOOR MEASURING SHELFS DURING THE RUSH HOUR. SHE BROKE BOTH HER ARMS, SHE JUST GETS WORKMAN COMP, I THINK SHE SHOULD BE COMPENSATED FOR ALL THE TORTURE SHE HAS BEEN THROUGH. SHE CAN NOT EVEN BATH HER SELF, MY SIBLINGS AND MYSELF HAVE TAKEN TIME OFF WORK TO HELP HER, THIS IS GETTING HARD.AND WORKMAN COMP DONT EVEN COVER HER BILLS.
Posted by: mary at June 29, 2005 07:38 AM (LcOvq)
15
I want to place a lawsuit because i use to work for walmart and i got injured on the job ( i was pregnant and 17 years old) they sent me to the back to get blue bags (noone under 18 is allowed in the back) i got the bags and my back statrted hurting. i told my supervisor and the sent me to one of there docters. he gave me a motrin, ( i know its not really strong. but thats not for pregnant women in there 3rd trimester.) that medication could have killed or harmed my son. I WANT A LAWYER.......... ANY SUGGESTIONS????
Posted by: Maria Reyes at September 15, 2005 12:54 AM (7yPuK)
16
Recently went to Walmart and was refused my purchase because I didn't have another form of ID to show them , which is illegal for them to ask for by the way. They said they voided the transaction, yet the purchase is on my credit card and Visa nd Walmart refuse to remove it. I can't afford to take them to court over $208.00 , anyone have any advice?
Posted by: Steve at September 15, 2005 05:44 PM (5UsI2)
17
I am a former employee of walmart. I am in a situation were I am unable to get my job back at walmart. Officialy I am still employeed by walmart I am on a personal leave of absence but I am having a hard time trying to get back to work. I am getting very behind on my bills and they keep giving me the run around about they don't have any positions available at this time. Its been two and a half months now and they are still dening me a transfer. What should I do?
Posted by: ll at September 30, 2005 10:11 AM (K8Soo)
18
I recently slipped on water and fell at a Wal Mart store at the checkout, resulting in a hyrniated disc resting on my spine. I now have to have micro lumbar surgery. They denied my claim, saying they were not responsible. I was lied to by the manager. Security came out to check on me, and stated, "You took a Hard Fall", as evidently they saw everything on camera. Why is this so hard to prove where the water came from, if they have so many cameras everywhere? Why am I not entitled to atleast payment of my medical bills? I have never had surgery, and can't afford my bills, nor find an attorney to represent me.
Posted by: Pamela at October 22, 2005 11:17 AM (6krEN)
19
I left my car at the wal-mart parking lot after seeing a mass of people standing in line for tires and oil changes, i never spoke to a representative about my needs or had a ticket printed out or given any of my info. After one hour of shopping for my sister's wedding dress, i come back to find my car moved and being worked on by 3 walmart employees!!!How did they crank and move my car, the manager came out and explained they moved my car by mistake but i had gotten a free oil change. I had come for tires. The key that was used was to another car with the same make and model but had broken in the ignition, now i am without a car for a few days and still stunned, what should i do, any comments are appreciated.
Posted by: dg at November 06, 2005 02:32 PM (CcleW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Violence Against Santa on the Rise
Attacks on Santa Claus are a stark reminder just how naughty some people can be. While random acts of violence occur all the time around the world, why would someone pick on Saint Nick?
A group of French teenagers have mugged Father Christmas, attempting to steal his sack of presents.
The man dressed as Santa Claus was handing out sweets in the southern town of Ales when things turned nasty.
One of the teenagers demanded extra sweets and, when the red-cloaked Santa refused, he and his friends started kicking and pummelling the man.
- BBC
I wish I could report that was the only incident of violence against Santa, but Shamokin, Pennsylvania
Santa was shot at with a pellet gun. I know what these people are getting in their stockings this Christmas.
Cross-posted at In the Bullpen
Posted by: Chad at
02:21 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 149 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I might be the only person to read this blog who knows someone from Shamokin Pa. It's a small world.
The french attacks on Santa are probably some french muzzie.
The Shamokin attacks, are just some drunk red neck, settling the score, because Santa banged his wife, on the hood of a pick up truck, behind the bar. I think Shamokin has one bar.
Posted by: Princess Kimberley at December 23, 2004 12:40 PM (C0pXZ)
2
Those french teen thugs should be bureid alive under a mountian of coal until they ether learn a lession of smother they should be taken to the woodshed for a little aplication of disapline and screw the child care experts their a bunch of nambdy pambdies anyway
Posted by: sandpiper at December 24, 2004 03:11 PM (fvObb)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
India Names 32 Terrorist Groups
-
Sify
New Delhi: The government has notified 32 prominent organisations/groups as terrorist organisations operating mainly in Jammu and Kashmir, North-East and Naxal-affected states, Rajya Sabha was informed on Wednesday.
A number of terrorist groups operating in Jammu and Kashmir and North-East had their hideouts in neighbouring countries, Minister of State for Home Affairs Sri Prakash Jaiswal said in a written reply.
[snip]
Hizbul Mujahideen, Lashkar-e-Toiba, Jaish-e-Mohammad, Harkat-ul Mujahideen, Harkatul-Jejad-e-Islami, Jamiat-ul- Mujahideen, Jammua and Kashmir Islamic Front, Al-Badr, Tehrik-e-Mujahideen and Al Umar are prominent militant groups operating in Jammu and Kashmir.
The United Liberation Front of Assam, All Tripura Tiger Force, National Democratic Front Bodoland and the People's Liberation Army are operating in the North-East region and are reportedly receiving funds from foreign countries.
Kashmir is the region in between India and Pakistan in which both countries claim sovereignty over. It is a mountainous region where clashes between both terrorists and Indian soldiers and terrorists and Pakistani soldiers occur on an almost daily basis. This is also the region where some feel Osama Bin Laden may be hiding out.
Cross-posted at In the Bullpen
Posted by: Chad at
02:13 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 193 words, total size 1 kb.
Islamic Jihad Site Taken Down
-
Novinite
The Islamic Jihad movement said Tuesday the United States had forced its Web site host to close down Jihad Web sites. A statement sent to UPI by the Jihad media office in Gaza said the Ukrainian host had been forced by the US Defense Department to shut them down "to keep the Palestinian voice silent."The statement said the Ukrainian host had sent apologies saying it had been pressured by the United States.
About damn time too! There are of course hundreds of terrorist websites still operating without any type of censure, spreading their propoganda while hailing the murder of innocents. Terrorists are perhaps more inclined to adapt to changing technology and their use of the internet to spread their radical Islamic ideology of "love" is sickening to those who oppose it.
Internet Haganah though reports the site was not taken down by the U.S. government, rather "'Al Haganah' type activity."
Perhaps the thing that has bugged me the most is the inability, or refusal more appropriately, of the United States to shut down these sites. Most terrorist websites are housed by U.S. hosting companies. There is the intelligence factor, and one would have to assume the CIA is actively pursuing the names and locations of those who both frequent and post on these sites, however the effect of a terrorist website on those that are easily swayed is the main reason why all of them need to be taken down.
There have been terrorist sites taken down permanently before, but when a small fraction is removed an even larger group opens up. Terrorists also hide their sites on the servers of unknowing participants.
In an effort to keep any willing participants who like to cause trouble with terrorists, specifically their sites, I will re-post a couple of email addresses of the Islamic Army of Iraq.
enas2009@hotmail.com Webmaster of the site
iaiiraq-subscribe@yahoogroups.com Permission email to be included in the "peaceful" Yahoo Group
Editor's Note: I do not condone hacking or spamming of email addresses. I only present the facts and let the readers decide what to do. Please act responsibly.
Cross-posted at In the Bullpen
Posted by: Chad at
02:02 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 366 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Too bad they can't get rid of Al Jazeera as well.
Posted by: Laura at December 22, 2004 06:14 PM (ptOpl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
New Zeland Safe Haven for Terrorists
-
CNN
WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) -- Islamic extremists with links to international terror groups are believed to be using New Zealand as a safe haven, the nation's top spy agency has warned.
Security Intelligence Service Director Richard Woods said in his annual report to Parliament that "increased vigilance and effort" was needed to ensure the country was neither the victim nor source of international terrorism.
"From the service's own investigations we assess that there are individuals in, or from, New Zealand who support Islamic extremist causes," Woods wrote.
The developments "indicate attempts to use New Zealand as a safe haven from which activities of security concern elsewhere can be facilitated and/or the involvement of people from New Zealand in such activities."
There are people in every country around the world who support radical Islamic causes. Exactly what has been learned to indicate something special in New Zeland is not known.
There have been various rumors as to where the next Afghanistan will be. Some say Bangledesh is the next Afghanistan based upon a growing Muslim population and poverty. Sure, New Zeland will probably never be close to Afghanistan in terms of supporting terrorism, however the alarm given by New Zeland's intelligence official raises a few eyebrows as to why this type of statement was made unless there is a viable threat.
Cross-posted at In the Bullpen
Posted by: Chad at
11:08 AM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 239 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Surprise to me. My sister and her family spent three years there as part of the American Embassy and if anything was going on, as ignorant of such matters as she may be, she would have known this, that's for sure. It was the safest place in the world for her to be compared to China and Hungary and other countries she's lived in.
Cindy
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 22, 2004 11:52 AM (D39Vm)
2
It won't take long to find them, there's more sheep than people.
Posted by: karl at December 22, 2004 12:41 PM (PM/BC)
3
Haha that is true, karl.
~C
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 22, 2004 01:05 PM (D39Vm)
4
Personally, I think it's probably overblown. Calling a country a "safe haven" sounds akin to Afghanistan under Taliban rule. The differences between pre-invasion Afghanistan and New Zealand are pretty significant, with one being a much clearer example of a terrorist safe haven than the other.
Typically, aspects of a country like free speech or free expression have been considered factors conducive to it being a considered a "safe haven," even though such qualities are a part of any of our day-to-day lives.
So, in a nutshell, I think it's trying to make a mountain out of a molehill.
Posted by: Venom at December 22, 2004 01:56 PM (dbxVM)
5
I agree with you Venom. I thought it was a bit strange myself, but then again I've never been to New Zeland therefore I didn't know there were more sheep than people there until today.
Posted by: Chad at December 22, 2004 02:03 PM (+p/DW)
6
Chad, mailmen ride bicycles to deliver the mail in NZ and there's this one mailman who tries to "outbike" this horned sheep on a daily basis. Kind of funny actually. Second why would you agree with Venom on anything?
Ewww
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 22, 2004 04:43 PM (D39Vm)
7
Heh. Cindy, I must have forgotten to take my medicine this afternoon.
Posted by: Chad at December 22, 2004 05:07 PM (TAyPf)
8
"Second why would you agree with Venom on anything?"
Uhh...because I'm right? And what kind of idiot disagrees with someone out of principle, regardless if that someone is speaking the truth.
Just because I don't agree with a mindless windbag like yourself, Cindy, doesn't mean I'm an irrational person. My opinions are based on facts. Yours are based on emotion.
Posted by: Venom at December 23, 2004 11:01 AM (dbxVM)
9
first define haven
than define threat
than read this post for what it is. fear mongering. i think enough of that goes on over the radio and from the white house.
the blogosphere can do without it.
Posted by: Jorgey at December 23, 2004 11:11 AM (vxVhq)
10
Jorgey, I believe you already made your point in your post where you took this post out of context. For fear mongering to work, you must actually have fear in what is reported/advocated. I don't know that anyone fears the report by New Zeland intelligence on this blog therefore I cannot say simply posting something regarding this is fear mongering on my part.
I've heard many critiques of various posts of mine but this is the first time I've been accused of fear mongering. I probably could scare some people with false accusations and fabricated stories, but I do not do this. In fact, I believe if you would re-read what I said in the post you would see that I am more than skeptical, but then again those that believe everything related to terrorism is fear mongering do not take the time to read things in context.
Posted by: Chad at December 23, 2004 11:27 AM (aieOC)
11
I don't believe it. However, venom agrees simply because he is in disagreement with orginal info. If inthebullpen would have stated (New Zealand is not a safe place for terrorists) venom would have replied Oh yes it is. Has nothing to do with right or wrong. NOW THATS A FACT.
Posted by: greyrooster at December 23, 2004 12:27 PM (visY3)
12
Whatever you say, conspiracy theorist.
I said New Zealand shouldn't be considered a safe haven because it doesn't fit the profile as a safe haven. Get your head out of your ass.
Posted by: Venom at December 23, 2004 12:48 PM (dbxVM)
13
Those sheep with the 'goaty beards' can also be of great use, such as providing camouflage for the terrorists.
Posted by: Karl at December 23, 2004 02:48 PM (PM/BC)
14
Dammit, I am not a mindless windbag, Venom. You are. Actually I agreed with your post but that's another story. I will not kowtow to you in any way; it's just to easy for you to put others down and I wish you'd go back to your anthill and stay there. You are not welcome here and for someone so stupid, I know an awful lot.
Cindy
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 24, 2004 01:36 AM (D39Vm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 21, 2004
Al-Manar TV Dubbed 'Terrorist' Station
From MediaGuardian.co.uk comes the
report (Free reg.) that the Lebanese al-Manar satellite television channel and broadcast station has been placed on the list of terrorist organizations by the U.S. Produced by Hezbullah, the station regularly broadcasts anti-Israel and anti-Semitic programs filled with hate propaganda. As an example, the station recently accused Israel of spreading AIDS to Arab populations throughout Africa.
The French-based media group, Reporters Sans Frontieres (Reporters Without Borders), has condemned the U.S. actions by stating that al-Manar doesn't broadcast terrorist propaganda all the time, sometimes they do news reporting. Understandably, the U.S. doesn't buy the 'part-time terrorist' argument and cut al-Manar's satellite feed to America and said that anyone with links to the station would be expelled from or refused a visa to enter the country.
My take is that it's about time. The terrorist organizations use the willful media as strategic weapons to incite hatred, recruit fanatics, and sway public opinion. Any prudent war planning would consider the terrorist media as targets. Al-Manar should be happy that it's only had the plug pulled.
Companion post at Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
10:18 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 190 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I just don't understand the French. They try to undermine anything America does. Short memories. Ungrateful. French say we should not have stuck our noses in the middle east. I wonder if we did the right thing when we stuck our noses in Europe 60 years ago. Maybe not. Hey, I wonder if this character Jim and Venom are French? They act the same.
Posted by: greyrooster at December 21, 2004 10:34 PM (FtnlD)
2
It has nothing to do with us as America or the US foreign policy. It is the arrogent colonial bourgeoisie attitude of the French. The French view themselves as the purveyors of flawless "laice" (Secularism) view of all things in this world. Help from the French came to us during a period when French were fighting for the same cause as us: freedom from oppressive leadership. Now the French have become the whore of the UN; they will go to bed with anyone who will stand up to their view or do what they want, but wont just do it with anyone due to their work ethic of not doing something for free just because it might help someone.
I have to point out something important: the French have caused more of the problems in the Middle East along with the British, but still have the gall to stand and blame us for all of the problems we have caused. At least we dont cut and run like the French. Every encounter in Africa and the Middle East has resulted in the French killing locals and causing a worse insurection than what the situation began with, then they just up and walk out saying "we have done what we can!". I feel for the French soldiers and Foreign Legion troops who have to put up with the pansy ass attitude of their political masters.
Posted by: Salamander at December 22, 2004 08:15 AM (D4mP3)
3
Should have been shut down long ago..
Posted by: qpr jon at December 23, 2004 01:53 AM (Mz9dT)
4
http://www.headlinemuse.com/Politics/mythfrench.htm
Posted by: davÃð Charles at March 17, 2005 01:52 PM (M3Oix)
5
WHERE IS SO TALKING "DEMOCRACY" AND FREEDOM OF SPEACH THAT BUSH ... THE OCUPATOR AND MORDER OF IRAQIS SAID ? AL MANAR TV IS THE ONLY 1 GREAT TV STATION WHITCH IS SHOWING AND SAY THE REAL TRUTH ABOUT OCUPATION OF THE PALESTINE , LIBANON BY THE JEWS ! AL MANAR TV IS NOT A ANY TERRORIST STATION !!! , HEZZBOLLAH IS NOT A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION THEY ARE ONLY THE RESISTANCE TO THE ZIONIST OCUPATION !!!
ALL THE SHIT ABOUT AL MANAR AND HEZZBOLLAH IS ONLY A GEORGE BUSH AND JEWS PROPAGANDA AGAINST THAT TELEVISON.
I WAS WATCHING AL MANAR TV IN THE PAST 2 YEARS UNTIL THIS FUCKING DISCONECTION BY THE FRENCH "JEWS" AND I CAN SAY THAT THEY DO NOT SHOW HATE AGAINST JEWS , THEY SHOW ONLY WHAT JEWS DO FOR THEM AND FOR ARABS IN PALESTINE , FOR EXAMPLE CRUSHING HOUSES WITH BULDOZERS , MISSLE STRIKES FROM APACHES ON ARAB HOMES , CARS..... !
GOD BLESS HEZZBOLLAH ,
GOD BLESS AL MANAR TV.
Posted by: ROCK at March 27, 2005 07:52 AM (HOblR)
6
Just like Americans and French find CNN and France 2 the leading news channels so is Al-Manar for the Arab world. It is the influence that this TV channel has on Muslims and Arabs around the world and the objective and professional way of reporting on events that lead the so-called "democracies" to censor Al-Manar.
They are thinking that this way they will show their own views of Abu-Ghraib, Jennine and American/Israeli occupation of Palestine/Iraq and other atrocities around the world without being confronted with pictures from the other side. This censorship only strengthens Al-Manar.
The US, Israel, and many other western countries spend so much money to control Arab opinion but in vain, because they can't change the truth they try to hide/mask/ignore it but they can't change it. Al-Manar with a fraction of that budget achieves much higher results with audiences in the Arab world and abroad even populations living in Israel and America by simply telling the truth. They put the pictures before you and you decide for yourself. They donÂ’t do embedded journalism. They are free journalists; they view things from their own angle.
As for hatred spreading, if this was the objective reason then TV channels such as FOX, CNN and many others should have been shutdown long time ago. Israel occupies many contries, demolishes Palestinian peoples houses, kill their children, and destroys their agricultural and industrial wealth. This by American standards is love spreading.
Al-Manar doesnÂ’t need to waist itÂ’s time spreading anything against Israel; Sharon is taking care of this task.
Hezbollah liberated his people and land from the zionist aggression and occupation (20 years of occupation, more than 50000 people killed by Israeli army using American weapons with American veto protection). Hezbollah defeated Israel and the US behind it that's why it is labeled as terrorist organization, but for millions around the world it a FREEDOME fighters.
Doesn't matter how big you think yourself are, you will not hide the sun.
Posted by: Kamal Sakkay at May 01, 2005 08:42 PM (7wMCR)
7
fuck Ameriqua and bouch!!!!!
Posted by: choucou at May 19, 2005 12:02 PM (mUa+J)
8
HIZBULLA ? YES I SAY TERRORIST THEY ARE BUT AGAINST THE KINGDOM OF TERRORIST ISREAL & THE U.S.A NOT AGAINST THE INNOCENT .THEY ARE THE FRIENDS OF ALL HUMANS JEWS , CHRISTIANS ETC.ETC.
THEY ONLY & ONLY HIZBULLAH KNOWS THE MEANING OF HUMAN RIGHT .SO INSHALLAH THESE SMALL GROUP WILL BRING JUSTICE TO THE WORLD .LONG LIVE SAYEED HASSAN NASRALLAH LONG LIVE HIZBULLA .ALLAH BLESS YOU ALL .B HAQ MUHAMMAD WA 2ALLI MUHAMMAD
Posted by: mujahid at May 23, 2005 02:07 AM (LZoWB)
9
Hezzbollah is nothing but a palestinian islamic terrorist organization supported by Iran and Syria located in lebanon. All they are good for is causing more trouble for lebanon. Iran and Syria should do the dirty work on their own and not use palestinians and lebanese as puppets. But because they do, this deems them nothing but cowards, with shitty ass countries and a population of idiots. People with the islamic jihaad are hollow headed and are meer idiots. They need to take a hammer to the head to finally use their heads for a change, even then they will probably never wake up. SHA3IB BAGAM, BHEEM, HAKEER!
Israel is also cowardly for targetting innocent civilians and crushing their homes. This crisis in the middle east will never end because it is fought by 2 sides who are very much alike :stubborn and stupid, a very bad combination.
Now, for palestinian retaliation with suicide bombing is very bad BUT yet sooo understandible because they are left with nothing to defend themselves and are pretty much treated like shit. Jews are too paranoid and pretty much have no respect for anybody but themselves for "they ahve suffered soo much." SO UR GONNA GET OVER IT BY DOING IT TO OTHERS!!???....shittiest solution EVER!
Now, i criticize both sides, islamic jihaad and israel because they both are...(i have to keep it pg13)
THSE TERRORIST GROUPS LIKE HEZZBOLLAH AND HAMAS ONLY BRING MORE TROUBLE TO THEIR COUNTRIES AND PEOPLE RATHER THAN HELP THEM. STUPID YOUTH THESE DAYS ALSO FOLLOW THESE GROUPS BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN RAISED IN THAT STUPIDLY MANNER BY THEIR STUPID PARENTS. BUT WHAT CAN U DO WHEN U HAVE BEEN TERRORIZED OR KNOW PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN TERRORIZED RIGHT? SO THIS IS WHY A SOLUTION IS VERY FAR! PARENTS WILL CONTINUE RAISING THEIR KIDS WITH THIS SHITTY MENTALITY.
I HOPE SOMEDAY HEZZBOLLAH AND HAMAS ARE DESSIMATED FOR I SHALL LAUGH AT THEM.
ITS EITHER REALIZE NOW THAT YOUR ACTIONS ARE POINTLESS AND ONLY BRING MORE HARM...OR...GET WHAT YOU DESERVE AND BE LAUGHED AT..MORE THAN U ARLDY ARE LAUGHED AT. LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLOLOLLLLLLLL LMAO RFLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAHAHAHAH.
THOSE GROUPS KILL ME LOL...SEE WHAT NO EDUCATION CAN DO TO YOU..STAY IN SCHOOL KIDS, SEE THE WORLD OPEN UR EYES. DONT STAY BETWEEN 4 WALLS ALL DAY AND SEE FOR YOURSELF WHAT UR SOCIETY IS DOING..AND U BE THE JUDGE..TO FOLLOW THIS UTTER COLD, MURDERIOUS, HATING, STUBBORN, BRAIN WASHED,PATH OR NOT...
Posted by: Habib at July 12, 2006 03:59 PM (vYbQc)
10
Hezzbollah is nothing but a palestinian islamic terrorist organization supported by Iran and Syria located in lebanon. All they are good for is causing more trouble for lebanon. Iran and Syria should do the dirty work on their own and not use palestinians and lebanese as puppets. But because they do, this deems them nothing but cowards, with shitty ass countries and a population of idiots. People with the islamic jihaad are hollow headed and are meer idiots. They need to take a hammer to the head to finally use their heads for a change, even then they will probably never wake up. SHA3IB BAGAM, BHEEM, HAKEER!
Israel is also cowardly for targetting innocent civilians and crushing their homes. This crisis in the middle east will never end because it is fought by 2 sides who are very much alike :stubborn and stupid, a very bad combination.
Now, for palestinian retaliation with suicide bombing is very bad BUT yet sooo understandible because they are left with nothing to defend themselves and are pretty much treated like shit. Jews are too paranoid and pretty much have no respect for anybody but themselves for "they ahve suffered soo much." SO UR GONNA GET OVER IT BY DOING IT TO OTHERS!!???....shittiest solution EVER!
Now, i criticize both sides, islamic jihaad and israel because they both are...(i have to keep it pg13)
THSE TERRORIST GROUPS LIKE HEZZBOLLAH AND HAMAS ONLY BRING MORE TROUBLE TO THEIR COUNTRIES AND PEOPLE RATHER THAN HELP THEM. STUPID YOUTH THESE DAYS ALSO FOLLOW THESE GROUPS BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN RAISED IN THAT STUPIDLY MANNER BY THEIR STUPID PARENTS. BUT WHAT CAN U DO WHEN U HAVE BEEN TERRORIZED OR KNOW PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN TERRORIZED RIGHT? SO THIS IS WHY A SOLUTION IS VERY FAR! PARENTS WILL CONTINUE RAISING THEIR KIDS WITH THIS SHITTY MENTALITY.
I HOPE SOMEDAY HEZZBOLLAH AND HAMAS ARE DESSIMATED FOR I SHALL LAUGH AT THEM.
ITS EITHER REALIZE NOW THAT YOUR ACTIONS ARE POINTLESS AND ONLY BRING MORE HARM...OR...GET WHAT YOU DESERVE AND BE LAUGHED AT..MORE THAN U ARLDY ARE LAUGHED AT. LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLOLOLLLLLLLL LMAO RFLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAHAHAHAH.
THOSE GROUPS KILL ME LOL...SEE WHAT NO EDUCATION CAN DO TO YOU..STAY IN SCHOOL KIDS, SEE THE WORLD OPEN UR EYES. DONT STAY BETWEEN 4 WALLS ALL DAY AND SEE FOR YOURSELF WHAT UR SOCIETY IS DOING..AND U BE THE JUDGE..TO FOLLOW THIS UTTER COLD, MURDERIOUS, HATING, STUBBORN, BRAIN WASHED,PATH OR NOT...
Posted by: Habib at July 12, 2006 04:01 PM (vYbQc)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Army of al SunnahÂ’s Communique
International Terror Consultant Evan F. Kohlmann of
Global Terror Alert has released the communique given by the Ansar al-Sunnah Army claiming responsibility for the
attack on the United States mess hall in Mosul. As I had questioned, as had
Hyscience, the wording the Army of al-Sunnah regarding "martyrdom" raised a few eyebrows and questioned the initial reports.
Kohlmann too noticed this. The area in question of the communique reads as follows, translated by Evan F. Kohlmann:
Allah has aided the mujahideen who fight the enemies of Allah - the occupiers and the apostate - in causing a massacre among the crusade Americans. One of the mujahideen of the Ansar al-Sunnah Army carried out a martyrdom operation at 12 noon on Tuesday, December 21, 2004 at a restaurant belonging to the infidel occupation forces in the Al-Ghazlani camp in Mosul. Two medivac helicopters were seen carrying away the bodies of the dead and wounded. This heroic operation was videotaped and will be shown later, if Allah wills it.
Along with a mortar round, a suicide bomber had infiltrated the base. Now how could a terrorist walk into the base that is presumably well guarded? My guess, which is purely speculative at this moment, is that one of the Iraqi soldiers, translators, electoral officials, etc. were in disguise.
Terrorists have long grabbed up credentials of Iraqi officials with clearence into U.S. bases either through killing the officials and grabbing them or stealing them. Is it completely plausible that the suicide bomber gained access to the base in this type of fashion.
You can read the entire communique here, again courtesy of Global Terror Alert.
Update:
- ABC News (via Wizbang)
Dec. 22, 2004 — New evidence shows the bombing of a U.S. military mess tent in the northern Iraqi city of Mosul on Tuesday — which killed 22 people and wounded 70 others — was a suicide attack, ABC News has learned.
Investigators at the base have found remnants of a torso and a suicide vest that was probably a backpack, sources told ABC News, indicating that the attack was a suicide bombing.
This of course strengthens the validity to the above communique.
Update:
According to Fox News, information contained on Ansar al-Sunnah's website indicates a suicide bomber worked for the base for over two months. He was 24 years old and recently married. During his employment on the U.S. base, he collected intelligence and locations of specific targets.
Just as Craig said in the comments, we should realize what terrorists claim is not always accurate. This claim however has seemed to be proven accurate so right now I have no reason to doubt the suicide bomber was in fact a former employee on the base. There is no word though on what type of employment he held.
Update:
With the reports of a suicide bomber being confirmed by the U.S. military based upon the finding of several BBs or small pieces of shrapnel, it is newsworthy to show the link to a video of the development and testing of a suicide bomber bomb (video courtesy of Global Terror Alert). In the video you will see a bomber's belt being assembled as well as demonstrated against cardboard "people."
Cross-posted at In the Bullpen
Posted by: Chad at
09:25 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 551 words, total size 4 kb.
1
I would be very surprised to see that a terrorist made it into the camp with any type of explosive device. The TCNs (third country nationals) who work on these bases are throughly searched coming on and off the bases. Is it possible that an insurgent made it onto base with, say, a hand grenade. Yes, it is not outside the realm of possibility. Would the said hand grenade really be able to as much damage as depicted in the story and pictures. No. Much more likely that a 122mm rocket was the cause. And these rockets are not guided, just point and shoot and hope you did the math correctly. All luck after the fuse is lit. But for the purposes of the terrorists, it just sounds better for all of the other nuts that have joined if a fellow brother in Islam tied a bomb to himself, and, for the glory of Allah, was able to infiltrate into the evil Zionist lap dogs' chow hall and blow himself up.
Posted by: Craig at December 21, 2004 09:57 PM (FjNzj)
2
This is not a surprise. If you have ever read CB's reports in his blog MY WAR, you can tell from his stories that it is easy to get in and out of the FOB. He has such stories and I have them in archive since he closed up his blog. He is at this base in Mosul, so I am worried about him and another soldier with a milblog there. This group is associated with Al-Zawari, an offshoot of Al Qaeda. These terrorist groups tape everything they do; we see only a little of what they do; how they could tape it, would only mean one of the Iraqi's in there - the drivers or translaters was somehow compromised but these terrorists groups are also very good at stealing info right from our own satelites and use it as part of their propaganda films. I didn't hear anything about a suicide bomber but this FOB is used to having morters and rockets over the wall and then booking it out of there, never to be caught. This time they hit the right place at the right time which makes me believe that one of the Iraqi's had to be in on it somehow - someone who was probably trusted by the soldiers there and who's family was probably at great risk. That's just one theory of many. Another theory is that whomever sent those morters shells over the wall just happened to get the right place at the wrong time just by accident. Ansar Al-Sunnar, like the other terrorist groups, usually plan these things down to the last detail and since they can hack even into the military computers for how this base is set up, not like the usual hit and run which does no damage, planned this for the worst possible effect and they are very good at what they do. My stomach turns that 19 out of 24 dead are US soldiers eating chow and 64 or more injured. I know people there and it bothers me that I'll never know how they're doing or if they are okay considering all the action that has been happening in Mosul lately. My hearts go out to all the families and the individuals themselves who were part of this melee; our soldiers are not even safe in their own base but this FOB does have it's own hospital, airport and more, and now they are no longer safe. They are also proud for it didn't matter who was hurt, everyone took care of each other. We have a lot to be proud of when it comes to our soldiers but this is the greatest loss of people in over a year. It makes me ache inside.
If you want to know more about this group and it's affiliations, go through Rusty's archives; all the information is right there for your reading. These people kidnap, behead, make car bombs and are associated with Al Zawari and Al Qaeda; they are responsible for much of the terrorism going on in Iraq. What was done is Falluja will also have to be done in Baghdad and in Mosul; after that they have no where else to go except back into Afghanistan and Pakistan, but go through the archives, you will find plenty of info on this group.
What we need to do is be there for our soldiers, their families and more. All the injured may need help for the rest of their lives. This was a very sad day indeed and it broke my heart when I first heard about this horrendous event at the Mosul chow hall.
Expect more of this, expect that the Iraqi's must stand up at the plate and do everything in their power to stop these events even though they're being blown to bits themselves but mostly for our boys and their families - the living and the dead. This FOB is where most of the Strykers are located, too, so those families will be wondering until they hear word one way or another.
God Bless them all and my condolences to them all as well; for those who were injured, speedy recovery and I hope I can get it out of my heart and mind myself soon; just what these families needed at this time of year. I can't even imagine how bad this was but I know it was a living hell, a shock and a surprise to all those who were involved. I personally find this extremely upsetting.
We should find out where these soldiers were from, where their american bases were and give them all the love and support to them and their families as possible.
Cindy
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 21, 2004 10:43 PM (D39Vm)
3
I eat my words. I guess the terrorists did find a way to get a bomb past security. From my experience, this would have been extremely difficult to do, but nothing is fool proof. The only consolation(and not much of one) is that the terrorist is atleast burning in hell this Christmas.
Posted by: Craig at December 22, 2004 12:19 PM (b12Jq)
4
Amen, Craig.
Most of the soldiers werer from the Stryker Brigade in Fort Lewis, Washington.
~C
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at December 22, 2004 01:22 PM (D39Vm)
5
There is going to be a day of reckoning for these murdering cocksuckers and it is going to be soon. American Soldiers will not stand by while these animals remain on the loose.
We are going to put these running dogs down. I hope I am there when it happens. I want to be the one with my foot on their throat holding them down while I put two right in their forehead.
I have been to these countries before and this is truly all they understand. They understand force and bigger guns and subjugation. The good people of Iraq deserve freedom. These monsters, like all their kind, deserve to go straight to hell, courtesy of the US Military.
Zarquawi, your days are numbered. Ansar Al Islam, hell is coming to your doorstep. We got Saddam, we will get you too.
No God will protect you.... Mark my words, there will be retribution for this act.
Screw Zarquawi, Osama and the Partisan Treasonous Liberal Media that cheers for these jackasses. I hope the next bomb lands right on top of all of them.
Posted by: Dave at December 23, 2004 01:22 AM (xfI1/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Light sabers
Hi everybody... also guest blogging while Rusty is away. Here are some
light sabers to play with for a start.
The Flea
Posted by: Flea at
05:00 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I think I'm dumber for having gone to that site. Thanks Flea.
Posted by: Leopold Stotch at December 21, 2004 05:14 PM (qS6hM)
2
Notice all the other Lightsabres are red or dark blue or purple or green, but Annakin's is powder blue? What's up with that?
Posted by: Brian B at December 21, 2004 06:30 PM (CouWh)
3
Cool.
Need a duel site. I want to see that smashing electrical stuff when they strike each other. Somehow I don't think this is productive
But hey it's Christmas Eve who is working that hard today anyway.
Posted by: Howie at December 24, 2004 11:27 AM (YdcZ0)
4
YOU GAVE ME NO HELP! YOUR COMPANY STINKS!
Posted by: PETER POOPSTICK at December 30, 2004 11:42 PM (9d5RX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
189kb generated in CPU 0.6007, elapsed 2.8472 seconds.
135 queries taking 2.7638 seconds, 435 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.