March 11, 2005
Are the Italians on to Sgrena?
Interesting development, Sgrena being questioned by police AGAIN. Hmmmmm, could it be all the inconsistencies in her tale? AP:
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Meanwhile, Italian prosecutors conducting their own investigation on Thursday questioned former Italian hostage Giuliana Sgrena again in the Rome military hospital where she is recovering from a shoulder wound sustained in the March 4 shooting.Ok, I have a big date with Mrs. Shackleford tonight. Ciao.
Posted by: Rusty at
05:13 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 75 words, total size 1 kb.
1
See! I had a feeling all along the Italian government would catch up to her BS. Thanks for answering my question the other night on the radio!
Oh and have fun on your date too!
Posted by: Macker at March 11, 2005 05:34 PM (Ue0Bo)
2
Have a few too meeny martoonies..enjoy you know.
Heard on the radio that some Italian "High Official" gave her notice: to please STFU with the wild accusations, that she'd donme enough harm already.
Stupid Communists, always lying, get people killed.
Posted by: -keith in mtn. view at March 11, 2005 06:31 PM (sE9R7)
3
Unbelievable how the hard left latched onto every accusation she made. Her story will go down in flames and her proponents will find a new issue.
Posted by: Mink Karlieb at March 12, 2005 12:11 AM (nuVko)
4
And they never, never admit they were wrong. Just go on to another issue of the same type.
Posted by: greyrooster at March 12, 2005 12:26 AM (CBNGy)
5
Big date? Let me guess...Chuck E. Cheese's?
Posted by: Mr. K at March 12, 2005 07:01 AM (IcZsX)
6
You deserve to be plagiarized. You're the leading authority on Sgrena, and you have a hell of a blog.
Posted by: Carlos at March 12, 2005 09:39 AM (8e/V4)
7
Carlos is right. You're doing a great job getting the information out.
Posted by: Stan LS at March 12, 2005 01:30 PM (HYcSU)
8
Thanks one and all. It's Spring Break so posting might be light for awhile.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at March 12, 2005 04:49 PM (JQjhA)
9
hey
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at March 12, 2005 05:07 PM (JQjhA)
10
that cannot have been an intentional attack by US forces: not only because they could then have finished the job, but when secret services want to kill somebody, as the SISMI (Italian Military Secret Service) has pointed out at
http://www.corriere.it/Primo_Piano/Cronache/2005/03_Marzo/05/raccontosgrena.shtml
they don't do it via a tank with a clearly waving "US ARMY" flag on it and via bullet that are standard of the Us Army so to leave more evidence, and then staying on place to be sure they get identified: they would do it via paid iraqis, that intercept the ongoing car with a shoulder carried bomb launcher made for instance in Syria , would blow up the whole car in one second, and would go home leaving no one on place and after that would blame the iraqi "resistance". This is the way a secret service would work, it would not send in the... marines with a flag on their caps for these "jobs"!
Posted by: Alberto at March 13, 2005 06:38 PM (PV9W5)
11
Alberto: How true, how true. We are not beginners.
Posted by: greyrooster at March 13, 2005 10:28 PM (CBNGy)
18kb generated in CPU 0.0239, elapsed 0.1104 seconds.
118 queries taking 0.1007 seconds, 250 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
118 queries taking 0.1007 seconds, 250 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
