So Andrew Sullivan tries to act all hetero for a few posts. Dude just doesn't get it. Stick with the gay thing man.
more than a blog devoted to celebrities......
1
He's so gay.
When you can go from pro-Bush foreign policy hawk to Kerry supporter just because of gay, then you're too gay.
Posted by: Carlos at May 10, 2005 04:58 PM (8e/V4)
2
OK, IÂ’ll start it off:
In the immortal words of Butch in a post last week…” No one was ever born with a feeding tube” Butch 5/2005
First thing I thought of when I read this thread….” No one was ever born with a tube of K-Y Jelly”. ….Brad 5/2005
BoysÂ’, playing the back nine is against the rules. Wanting to do it is forgivable; doing it without asking forgiveness is a ticket to eternity in a very nasty place.
Just want to warn ya. Aint none of us perfect, but all of us sinners can turn it around.
Filthy Allah, I made fun of your goats a couple of weeks ago, and IÂ’m damn sorry about it.
Posted by: Brad at May 10, 2005 05:14 PM (aUEhc)
3
Yeah, Andrew is the C3PO of the 'sphere: So gay, acts like he's on the good guy's side, but when it comes down to the Jawas telling him what to do he puts on his knee pads like a good droid.
Posted by: Editor at May 10, 2005 08:15 PM (WUwLB)
4
So, Brad: if your wife puts on a strap-on and gives you a good time--that's a sin, huh? All right. And if you use her "back entrance" that's a sin as well . . .? I'd be interested in seeing where that's written in the rule book, 'cause I've never seen it there. It's intriguing that you're tempted, of course. I wonder whether that temptation pertains to back-door action, or homosexuality. Perhaps a little introspection is in order?
Rusty: I like the fact that Sullivan tried to explain that stereotypes were just stereotypes, that he isn't the way gays are portrayed in the media, and your reaction was essentially "yes you are! you just don't want to admit it!"
Plenty of men like guys who have hairy, masculine bodies (that is, after all, a classical part of the gay male experience: liking men).
And in my town lots of men do follow the lives of celebrities.
Rusty, Rusty: I love the work you do in terms of documenting some of the brutal murders going on in the Middle East, but on some issues you seem awfully naive.
To all: I understand that a lot of the readers here are philosophically opposed to homosexuality, but I cannot think that our Lord would approve of the way some of you formulate this disapproval, or the stance you take toward homosexuals.
We're told that Jesus hung out with prostitutes. I think that matters.
And I wish some of you guys would lighten up.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 11, 2005 01:48 AM (FAdyB)
5
Which brings me to the question: What is Rusty Shackleford? Homo/lesbian/straight/male/female/shemale or perhaps an energy being programmed to act human and gather useful propaganda to a website?
Posted by: A Finn at May 11, 2005 03:12 AM (cWMi4)
6
The biblical "rule book," has many references to activities that are condemned, including homosexual activity:
Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. Romans 1:24-27
But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully; Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind (Note: aresenokoitais: A sodomite, or homosexual), for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine; 1st Timothy 1:8-10
Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. Jude 1:7
Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind (Note: aresenokoitais: A sodomite, or homosexual), Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God. 1st Corinthians 6:9-11
About half the states still have laws, based upon the above, against sodomy on the books.
Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at May 11, 2005 07:15 AM (x+5JB)
7
Just to clarify: Rusty is gay, just not
all the way gay.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at May 11, 2005 08:15 AM (JQjhA)
8
I'm getting the impression that a large percentage of Zionazis have got the gay.
Posted by: greg at May 11, 2005 09:12 AM (/+dAV)
9
Attila hon,
I have been married 17 years. If I came up to bed and found my wife had strapped on what I think you are talking about, I would go running and screaming out the front door.
Good God, Is this whatÂ’s going on out there?
Hey YBP, great post. Are you a Deacon at your Parish?
Posted by: Brad at May 11, 2005 09:27 AM (pO1tP)
10
greg,
but that kind of gay just HAS gay.
But the other kind of gay IS gay-- it's entirely who they are and everything under the sun is about them being gay.
Posted by: Carlos at May 11, 2005 09:28 AM (8e/V4)
11
Good God, Is this whatÂ’s going on out there?
hehehe! Yup. People are bored out of their minds. They'll be fucking their dog Spot before long.
Posted by: Carlos at May 11, 2005 09:30 AM (8e/V4)
12
“but that kind of gay just HAS gay.
But the other kind of gay IS gay-- it's entirely who they are and everything under the sun is about them being gay.”-Carlos
Probably just my naiveté but I fail to appreciate the difference. Too nuanced for me to understand. Has gay?
Posted by: greg at May 11, 2005 09:42 AM (/+dAV)
13
Hi Brad: I'm not a deacon--yet. Merely continuing in my unofficial secular capacity as Lord High Curmudgeon Heresy-Finder General.
Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at May 11, 2005 09:56 AM (x+5JB)
14
greg,
HAS gay means it's not your entire life.
It means Bush's stance on gay marriage is irrelevant to your foreign policy views. Andrew Sullivan, who comments extensively on foreign policy, was unable to separate the two. He IS gay, so his view on foreign policy changed depending on where Bush stood on gay marriage.
That doesn't happen to someone who merely HAS gay.
Posted by: Carlos at May 11, 2005 10:07 AM (8e/V4)
15
Errr, Ahhh, Okey Dokey.
Are you sure this isn't just a way for My Pet Jawa Fags to rationalize their homosexuality? Where I come from a fag is a fag is a fag.
Posted by: greg at May 11, 2005 10:13 AM (/+dAV)
16
The big catch that wasn't?
Pakistan's arrest of Libyan Al Qaeda suspect not as big a breakthrough as first thought.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0510/dailyUpdate.html
The first American newspaper to admit what the rest of the world already knows, namely that the Libyan who was captured and said to be the #3 Al Qaeda man is just small fry.
Why would the rest of the American MSM remain silent on this? Because they are complicit in this war of lies and theyÂ’re trying desperately to make lemonade out of lemons.
Posted by: greg at May 11, 2005 10:31 AM (/+dAV)
17
greg,
aren't you posting that on the wrong thread?
LMAO!
Posted by: Carlos at May 11, 2005 10:53 AM (8e/V4)
18
Sorry, but I just can't take this Has Gay v. Is Gay thing seriously.
Posted by: greg at May 11, 2005 11:03 AM (/+dAV)
19
greg,
it's not meant to be taken all that seriously. Just a little bit seriously. Like a kernel of truth seriously.
And FYI, the CSMonitor agreeing with a couple of Lefty eurorags is hardly news.
Posted by: Carlos at May 11, 2005 11:15 AM (8e/V4)
20
Foreign Press Reporting that Zarqawi is Dead
http://www.proche-orient.info/xjournal_pol_der_heure.php3?id_article=40639#htdepage
Posted by: greg at May 11, 2005 11:18 AM (/+dAV)
21
greg,
is there a particular website where you pick up those foreign sources? I'd like to check it out.
Posted by: Carlos at May 11, 2005 11:19 AM (8e/V4)
22
Whatreallyhappened.com
&
Bushwatch.net
Enjoy!
Posted by: greg at May 11, 2005 11:23 AM (/+dAV)
23
greg,
my loony buddy turned me onto propagandamatrix dot com
check it out.
Posted by: Carlos at May 11, 2005 11:28 AM (8e/V4)
24
I'm familiar with it. It's not a bad site. Thanks though.
Posted by: greg at May 11, 2005 11:34 AM (/+dAV)
25
Gee thanks Brad,
I was not sure if any besides Greg, chicken little brain
ever read my posts. But if the first thing you thought of after
reading my post is about K-Y jelly, well I have to wonder bout
you now, and I hate to spoil your fantasies, but I am not that type.
Now the next point I have is most of you are yelling
that homosexual activities are a sin in the Bible. Repent, or
thou are doomed to hell. Right? But what if you are not a Christian?
Also why are Christians basing their whole salvation on just one
book. One book that was not written down until 3 centuries after Jesus
died. True the oral traditions have been around for ever, but have
they really never been changed from the begining? Fact, I heard of a
story about a 30 year old man, goes off into the desert and is tempted
by an evil being. This man of course turns down the temptation and
follows the good god. Sound familiar? It did to me, but then I found
out the man was not Jesus, but Zoroaster, who lived like 400 years before Jesus. The magies that came to visit the child Jesus, they to
, along with guardian beings (angels), all came from Zoroasterism. Now this is not so suprising considering that the Romans, the most infamous plagiarizers ever, complied the bible. When it comes down to
it, religion is a private affair, between oneself and ones diety(or dieties). As such, we should respects everyone's own beliefs as long
as those beliefs do not threaten society.
Unfortunately the Moral Majority does not like this idea. They
want everyone to believe as they do and want laws to enslave everyone
to follow them. Abortion is evil, lets outlaw it. Gay marriages are
evil, lets outlaw it. Mercy killing (when truly needed.) is evil,
lets outlaw it. Reading Huck Fin is evil, lets burn it. Mypetjawa is
evil (according to Google,
) lets close it down.
Posted by: Butch at May 11, 2005 11:52 AM (Gqhi9)
26
Just as the Holy Spirit guides the election of the pope, so it guideed the Bible, regarded by Christians as infallible.
Non-Christians will be judged by not by Christian precepts, but whether or not they have faithfully followed the law written upon their heart.
Zoroaster. No one denies the existence of pagan religions/cults before Christianity. And many New Testament incidents had "types," or forshadowings in the Old Testament.
Morality as a private matter leads to chaos, with loony fathers justifying the stabbing their children because they broke curfews.
We've all heard this before: "Your right is not my right." And 2+2=5, by the way.
The thing to remember is that Christianity deems it sinful to FORCE anyone to comply with its teachings.
Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at May 11, 2005 12:53 PM (x+5JB)
27
Hey Butch, I was just having a little fun.
Honestly, I donÂ’t give my team much hope to stop abortion, promote religion in public arena or just put some reasonable restraints on the gay juggernaut. The left is winning all these battles not us. You should be basking in your victories.
I throw up a comment about the Gay thing every now and then. Man the response can be just overwhelming. ItÂ’s probably a cheep shot, but its fun seeing the explosion that follows.
Hey, did you call Greg “chicken little brain”? I thought you two were bros.
Posted by: Brad at May 11, 2005 01:08 PM (aUEhc)
28
Bourbon/Brad:
Difficult to discuss without violating the PG rule, but plenty of straight men like to have their prostate glands tickled. That's sensation, not orientation. And I saw *nothing* in your scriptures that said anything about the prostate gland (or how to get there).
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 11, 2005 03:09 PM (FAdyB)
29
Brad, no, Chicken little brain is aka greyrooster. Who has not been
around lately. Honestly I take very little out here seriously. This
is a way for me to pass the time at work when I have slow time.
To You YBP, I did say as long as it did not society. (aka killing
kids because of late curfews.) Once again I say, no matter how saintly you or Pope John Paul II is/was, neither of you can ensure
me a place in heaven. Only my relationship with my God,(or gods) can
do that. It is cool for people of like beliefs to get together and worship as long as it hurts no one, (sorry human sacrifices are out).
And if it is a sin to force Christianity on to people, help bout telling that to MR. Bushie, and friends up in D.C.
.
As far as your right is not my right. Well some time this is true.
If we are in the same room, and you say it is too cold, and I say it
is to hot, which of us is wrong. Neither, due to the fact we each perceive the temperature differently. I guess that is my main point,
is that one's perception of something is not necessarily wrong, but
it can be different.
Posted by: Butch at May 11, 2005 03:13 PM (Gqhi9)
30
Butch: If a person says that the room is the "right" temperature, that's not really what we're talking about here. We're talking about "right" and "wrong" within the contect of morality.
I agree--the pope or any other Christian can't save anyone, be can show the way to holy living and eternal life through his office as Vicar of Christ.
Attilla Girl: Plenty of straight men cheat on their wives, but that doesn't make it morally permissable.
Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at May 11, 2005 04:45 PM (nU3B/)
31
>>>"...but plenty of straight men like to have their prostate glands tickled."
What a load of politically correct crap.
Posted by: Carlos at May 11, 2005 04:55 PM (8e/V4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
aranoid Idiotarian of the Day
Ok, I don't really have time to post, but I read this over at Eschaton's place.....talk about freaking nutty!!! Look, Atrios is just your run of the mill left-wing activist in the Democratic party. I've never considered him part of the tin-foil brigades, just part of the gay-hating pretending to be gay-loving gay-outing partisan left. But whoever this guy Avedon is.....man, this guy takes the cake!
