February 27, 2006
Don't Kill Me (Please)
WARNING: The following content is not suitable for Muslims.
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
01:42 PM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You might as well be on the Green Mile right now.
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at February 27, 2006 02:17 PM (RHG+K)
Posted by: Rusty at February 27, 2006 02:25 PM (JQjhA)
3
You want to die don't you? Not by me but from Muslims all over the world.
Posted by: Max Power at February 27, 2006 02:41 PM (CnDtU)
4
Screw the muslims all over the world.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 27, 2006 03:41 PM (0yYS2)
5
Actually, I just want the fatwa.
Posted by: Rusty at February 27, 2006 04:16 PM (JQjhA)
6
Just like Rusty - always taking the easy route to the fatwa. ;-)
Will someone PLEASE fatwa his arse?
Posted by: Oyster at February 27, 2006 05:34 PM (YudAC)
7
You're going to get now. Have you considered a home, or businnes defence weapon? I suggest a Mosberg 12 gauge pump shotgun. Make sure you have a lot of ammo, at least 4 shot, and make every third round buck shot. Oh yea, take the plug out, you will need the extra room in the tube when they come a calling.
Posted by: Leatherneck at February 27, 2006 05:55 PM (D2g/j)
8
Listen to the wannabe tough guys.
Posted by: sonic at February 27, 2006 06:08 PM (Gsn6c)
9
...dude...I realize it is a symbol of pride or something of the like to get a fatwa...but....ummm....I hope you don't have any children that might be put at risk as a result of the fatwa hunt...=(
Posted by: Joel Bain at February 27, 2006 06:41 PM (GkACI)
10
I have a Socom rifle. It puts the fatwa givers at extreme risk if they were to try and hurt my family. I would assume Rusty would have the equivalent.
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 27, 2006 06:48 PM (rUyw4)
11
Fatwas are on the way man. I am with Ali Sina too, humiliation is the only way. Muslims need to be made ashamed of the monicker "muslim" and after all, they are the filth of the earth and deserve no respect or quarter (they NEVER GIVE EITHER!!!)
Posted by: Kafirus Maximus at February 27, 2006 11:55 PM (zscmU)
12
Listen to the wannabe tough guys.
but sonic is a manly nickname, right?
Posted by: dave at February 28, 2006 12:43 AM (CcXvt)
13
THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!!!!
Everyone knows Saddam lost 10 pounds on his new wonder diet, so displaying Mo with the extra poundage is like showing the "before" photo without showing the more svelt "after" photo.
Posted by: Son Of The Godfather at February 28, 2006 02:34 AM (maXzk)
14
F the Muslims. Thats funny.
Posted by: Jack's Smirking Revenge at February 28, 2006 04:19 AM (CtVG6)
15
Fatwa of the Week. Enjoy.
(Also, the Mossberg is a very good choice.)
Posted by: grace at March 08, 2006 08:46 PM (WUjWD)
16
What is the most important information I should know about Clonazepam?
• Use caution when driving, operating machinery, or performing other hazardous activities. Clonazepam will cause drowsiness and may cause dizziness. If you experience drowsiness or dizziness, avoid these activities.
• Use alcohol cautiously. Alcohol may increase drowsiness and dizziness while you are taking Clonazepam. Alcohol may also increase your risk of having a seizure.
• Do not stop taking Clonazepam suddenly. This could cause seizures and withdrawal symptoms. Talk to your doctor if you need to stop treatment with Clonazepam.
What is Clonazepam?
• Clonazepam is in a class of drugs called benzodiazepines. Clonazepam affects chemicals in your brain that may become unbalanced and cause seizures.
• Clonazepam is used to treat seizures.
• Clonazepam may also be used for purposes other than those listed in this medication guide.
Posted by: CLONAZEPAM at April 08, 2006 10:04 AM (Cbja3)
Posted by: ALPRAZOLAM at April 12, 2006 10:26 PM (/Ilgk)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 23, 2006
The Death Of Islamofascism..
...lies with the likes of
Muslihoon.
No particular post to link to. Just read it all.
Besides, how can you not love a Muslim that dares say this:
Now, if a Christian were to enter Mecca and leave a cross/crucifix/Bible - ah, that's an interesting issue. (We'd do it, except We might be killed. Even if We were not, many thousands of innocent Christians and Westerners might be in the raging flames of the Muslims' reaction.)
If I were a Muslim, I'd be Muslihoon.
God is great, indeed.
Posted by: Vinnie at
03:43 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 96 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yeah let's all kiss his ass just because he
isn't calling for the deaths of infidels. I want to see a muslim writing about how he is ashamed of what his bretheren have done, and begging forgiveness, then I'll consider not putting his ears on a necklace, otherwise, he's fair game.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 23, 2006 05:20 AM (0yYS2)
Posted by: Oyster at February 23, 2006 08:02 AM (7YTVr)
3
He seems like a pretty ordinary guy.
The fact that this seems to be rare enough to require praise is rather indicative of where things stand, I think.
Posted by: MiB at February 23, 2006 09:38 AM (tFcEO)
Posted by: Oyster at February 23, 2006 11:15 AM (7YTVr)
5
Sorry guys, but I don't take in deserters from the enemy's camp, Sun Tzu wouldn't approve. In case anyone hasn't noticed yet, I'm possibly the most ruthless bastard anyone here will ever have direct contact with, and I'm the last person anyone wants as an enemy. As things are now, I'm the enemy of every muslim who draws breath, because they represent the ideology that threatens the existence of civilization itself. Mercy is weakness.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 23, 2006 04:02 PM (0yYS2)
6
If it ever came down to the nitty gritty, maxie, I'd definately want you on my side. I only hope you're wrong.
Posted by: Oyster at February 23, 2006 05:56 PM (YudAC)
7
I'm seldom wrong these days, because I have lived long enough to have learned from my mistakes, and those of others,and I have learned how to avoid making them. I am an amateur scholar in many different fields, and a student of everything. There is no subject that pertains to or effects humanity or the universe in which we live which does not fascinate me, and so I study everything, all the time. If I haven't studied
Wanna talk physics? Dinosaurs? Computer theory? Guns? Evolution? Religion? Warfare? Philosphy, both Eastern and Western? The habits of teenagers? The works of Kipling, Poe, Faulkner, et al? Latin? Greek? Ebonics? Sailing? Want to hear my theory about how jellyfish are the bridge between plants and animals? I can discuss pretty much any subject with at least some authority, and I say this without boasting. Now, this doesn't mean that I think I know everything, but I
am curious about everything, which means that before I speak on a subject, I've studied it from top to bottom, side to side, front to back,and am thus inclined to be right in my opinion. Mostly.
Sometimes I speak rashly, and somtimes, I get it flat wrong, but I am always willing to correct myself and admit when I'm wrong, because I don't let my emotions dictate my opinions, but just the opposite. I don't hate muslims because they're different, I hate them because they represent the end of civilization as we know it. I don't want future generations of heirs to Plato and Cicero, Alexander and Caesar, to become ignorant savages who must kneel to a meteorite five times a day or get their heads chopped off. I will fight to the death to save the West, even if it doesn't want to be saved. Even if I fight alone. Our Western heritage is thousands of years old, and it's worth fighting for, so we must expel every muslim from civilized lands so that they cannot threaten us any more.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 23, 2006 08:31 PM (0yYS2)
8
Thanks, Vince! I appreciate it very much. :-)
Posted by: Muslihoon at February 25, 2006 10:56 PM (Q8UK2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 21, 2006
Metrospy T-shirt Maker Threatened With Death.
Not just production manager Johnathan Alexander, his family too. Sample statements below are of the type that Jawa readers, unfortunately, are quite familiar with. Metrospy is offering a T-shirt with cartoon of Muhammad depicted with a bomb as a turban.
Personally I like this cartoon the most.Metrospy Website : Scores of liberals and hundreds of Islamo-fascists have written in to tell me that I should respect ALL religions. Most of the comments are pretty funny to people who know me. Some of the comments further confirm what I've always thought about the so-called "religion of peace"...there is nothing peaceful about it
More samples
here at YahooNews.
In one email the person writes, “We kill you and burn your shop. I am Muslim with forces in the U.S.A.”... ...Another email claims to be from the terrorist group Al Qaeda. It reads, “You only have 5 days and your company will disappear. I promise!” The email is signed, Saalem Al Qahtani, Al Qaeda... ...One of the more disturbing messages simply says, “In two days we kill your family."
Kill the family? How nice and peaceful.
Others : Thisblogisfullofcrap.
Posted by: Howie at
04:43 PM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 195 words, total size 2 kb.
1
That's just the kind of tolerance and understanding I've come to expect from the Religion of Peace™.
Maybe he should make a shirt that has the acronym "WWMD: What would Mohammed do?"
Posted by: reverse_vampyr at February 21, 2006 04:58 PM (Ns5kk)
2
The WWMD t-shirt should add a picture of a knife in a wound right after the question...
Posted by: Tracy at February 21, 2006 05:36 PM (YK8mo)
Posted by: Oyster at February 21, 2006 06:09 PM (YudAC)
4
T-Shirt??? I was looking for the tattoo...
Posted by: Bob at February 21, 2006 06:18 PM (EKMxC)
5
It shouldn't be long now. I'm glad the gun show is this weekend, so I can stock up on ammo.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 21, 2006 06:26 PM (0yYS2)
6
IM, I hope you don't trust your family's safety to gun-show reloads.
Posted by: See-Dubya at February 21, 2006 06:27 PM (Oj6de)
7
Where can I get myself one of these shirts?
Posted by: Phil at February 21, 2006 06:39 PM (cNAbl)
8
Gang, the WWMD shirt has been done.. Quite nicely too..
Check it out..http://www.mikechurch.com/zencart/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=50&zenid=8ade0d6d994596710bb64b2e5346d84e
Posted by: disgruntledinca at February 21, 2006 06:45 PM (mQZ5P)
9
He should make shirts just quoting the assholes. ROPMA, indeed.
Posted by: Jeff Medcalf at February 21, 2006 07:43 PM (4pYF5)
10
Darn, those 'few' extremists that have 'hijacked' the 'peaceful' religion of Islam sure get around.
Posted by: dave at February 21, 2006 08:00 PM (CcXvt)
11
Hello,toomuchcoffecan'tsleepandnothingtodosoIthoughtI'dcheckthisout.Nothingparticularlyinterresting,seeya.
Posted by: A Finn at February 21, 2006 08:17 PM (lGolT)
12
"Talkers talk, doers do", line in the sand, mother of all wars, drive the jooos into the sea blah, blah, blah, If you pislamic little girls want to scare someone besides yourselves you actually have to do something that exhibits the trait of strength. So far you have only embarrassed yourselves and your women folk(that's why they wear burqas). Piss on you and your pedophile prophet.
Posted by: Dadzilla at February 21, 2006 08:55 PM (CDWOE)
13
"Scores of liberals and hundreds of Islamo-fascists"
Personally i think we should call a spade a spade and say -
Hundreds of Islamo-fascists and their liberal allies/lackeys.
Posted by: MathewK at February 21, 2006 09:02 PM (pVHqF)
14
Heh. I just got my t-shirt in the mail. Too bad there aren't many Mosques in my state. I'd love to make a moose-limb seethe.
Posted by: REMF at February 21, 2006 09:17 PM (7RMSi)
15
I don't buy reloads, as they're usually far more expensive than milsurp.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 22, 2006 05:20 AM (0yYS2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 20, 2006
That 70's Mohammed
I drew the following horrific caricature of Mohammed back in those hazy days of the 70's. Man.
Do not go below the fold if you are in any way offended by caricatures of Mohammed.
more...
Posted by: Vinnie at
02:08 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.
1
And a very good likeness it is.
Posted by: Rod Stanton at February 20, 2006 06:06 AM (lwdxR)
2
I find your reproducing this to be highly offensive. However I did not find the NYT's 154 reproducitons of Piss Christ from 1989 - 2006 to be very offensive; it was just an exercise of "press freedom". The free press has to cover all the news. Not just the PC news.
Posted by: Rod Stanton at February 20, 2006 06:12 AM (lwdxR)
Posted by: Max at February 20, 2006 07:49 AM (Ol+Ma)
4
You forgot the pig snout.
Posted by: Sean Gleeson at February 20, 2006 08:22 AM (Mot0+)
5
gee Rod that seems like sort of a lot of reproductions of "piss christ" that is about 20 each year for 8 years or so. And the "free press" doesn't HAVE to do anything, which is why it is called a free press. They have only to print what they wish, and of course PROFIT is the main reason to publish anything. I am not sure if you know but an Arab is now the second leading share holder of Murdoch stock (fox news)
Posted by: john ryan at February 20, 2006 01:24 PM (TcoRJ)
6
Hey, john ryan, he was being sarcastic. Although he should have done a better job of seperating the sarcastic parts from his actual opinion.
Posted by: celestial at February 20, 2006 01:31 PM (T2R9c)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 17, 2006
Muhammed cartoons not offensive, but accurate
Spend a little time talking to jihadis and a common theme emerges:
they believe it is their religious duty to fight. In their view,
this duty is imposed on them in the Quran and by the example of the Prophet Muhammed who, by most accounts in the most widely accepted hadiths, is a man not averse to killing his enemies and spreading Islam through force and the sword. If you are a Muslim and reject the authenticity of those hadiths and of that interpretation of Quranic verses, then what's the problem?
As the Demosophist has reminded me on several occasions, if Muhammed didn't endorse violent jihad then the caricature of him in Danish newspapers is of a false Muhammed and therefore should be offensive to no one. However, if Muhammed did endorse violent jihad, then he deserves to be blasphemed.
Diana West in the Washington Times via Powerline.:
When the widely influential Sheik Yusef al-Qaradawi can praise Muhammad as "an epitome for religious warriors [mujahideen]," Muhammad, a jihad model, shouldn't be a taboo subject in the West, either in caricature or commentary, and certainly shouldn't be super-sacralized, in effect, by a fearfully polite censorship. The subject should be laid out for all to see.
Posted by: Rusty at
04:04 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 215 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Screw muslims and the goat they rode in on; we need to kill them all.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 17, 2006 04:48 PM (0yYS2)
2
We need to found a new religion so we can take advantage of the same freedom of religion the Muslims are granted. Key tenet of this new religion will be a mirror image of the Islamic call to kill or convert all the non-Muslims. Our new religion will call for killing or converting all the Muslims. Or at least all who do not at least submit to the supremacy of the anti-Allah.
Posted by: Glenmore at February 17, 2006 08:42 PM (kfbvH)
3
to say a few words
every body has their own belief
we should not condemned any religion if we
do soo,its like condeming our own religion
and disaster.
Posted by: maxis at February 17, 2006 11:52 PM (nbW2R)
4
Cults and religions have similarities but are not the same.
Posted by: forest hunter at February 18, 2006 02:51 AM (Fq6zR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Tanks For The Memories
Remember the
Karnival Of The Koran Krapping?
Da wife, bless her soul, participated back on TypePad.
After all this time, she got the most hilarious comment of all:
you are a idiot! We muslims didin`nt make like thiis...
I found it very wrong its not normal you are an idiot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and PIG
If any of you object to my marrying this woman, speak now, or forever hold your peace.
I love you honey!! But I'll be in court if you get fatwa'd first!!!
Posted by: Vinnie at
12:28 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 91 words, total size 1 kb.
1
So I can object and y'all will get unmarried?
And she'll be on the market again?
And I can finally start a harem.
Sure my wife and you would both shoot me, but a guy can dream can't he?
Posted by: phin at February 17, 2006 08:00 AM (Xvpen)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 16, 2006
Monty Python's The Life of Muhammed
Just kidding. Praise Allah. I would never blaspheme Muhammed. Never. (
Please don't kill me!)
Via Ayaan Hirsi Ali, this little reminder from Monty Python's Life of Brian that there is an upside to being murdered for blasphemy: comedy.
And the next time you're being chased by an angry mob of radical Islamist trying to stone you to death, remember to always look on the bright side of life........
Posted by: Rusty at
03:51 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 80 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Feb 22nd best of Monte Python on PBS
Posted by: Howie at February 16, 2006 04:14 PM (D3+20)
2
Screw you Howie you dimwitted twit!!
...
......
........ You did come here for the insults, right?
Posted by: Rusty at February 16, 2006 04:21 PM (JQjhA)
3
I hope I'm not being a "dimwitted twit," but I love that song!
Posted by: Don Miguel at February 16, 2006 04:29 PM (UAn5X)
4
Oh most definately
Rusty's a lumberjack and He's OK.
Posted by: Howie at February 16, 2006 04:30 PM (D3+20)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 16, 2006 04:43 PM (0yYS2)
6
If you want to see dhimmi look no further than the wikipedia.org article on the life of Muhammad.
Despite requests to place a picture of Muhammad in the article they place one of the censored arts (and even state
his face is veiled!!)
If you read the discussion sections there are numerous discussions of why an Encyclopedia should abide by a religious ideology by censoring it's own works, there are people arguing that "prophet" should be capitalized before/after his name like "Christ" etc. not to mention it says "Muhammad was visited by the Angel Gabriel who told him.." (yes very NPOV there!)
I'm glad Britannica never decided to censor it's work to bow to the authority of a religious ideology that isn't even shared by all Muslims.
Posted by: dave at February 16, 2006 05:14 PM (CcXvt)
7
Let's start our own wiki.
"THEIR so-called 'Prophet', Muhammed"
Posted by: Rusty at February 16, 2006 07:48 PM (JQjhA)
8
Piss on allah.
Roll "allah" in a pig carcass and piss on his head. allah and his followers are dark ages, nazi, (majority) stupid, MF pieces of shit. Piss on 'em.
"I'm a lumberjack and I'm O.K., I piss on allah every day",
"I sleep all night, I work all day, I want to crush this scourge"
Everybody sing........
"We are lumberjacks and we're O.K., We'll piss on allah every day".....
All together now..........
Recognize war when you see it before you. It's time to call out these nazi bastards. It's time to stand up and call a nazi a nazi.
Fight islam Now
Posted by: Fight islam Now at February 16, 2006 09:05 PM (3SXQJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 11, 2006
Dancing Mohammed and Rave Mullahs
You are
so fatwa'd for this! What's great is that they have a link to the 'Jesus Dance' page, too. I wonder if 'the American Taliban' we keep hearing about from the Left will show out in
mass protest and call for state censorship against Christian blasphemy? Hat tip:
Stephen Green
And via Headmistress SondraK this link to what seems to be the Islamic equivalent of Pentacostalism--only set to techno music so it's funny.
Posted by: Rusty at
12:03 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 84 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: smitty at February 11, 2006 12:38 PM (NaWoX)
2
I was never a religious person but these dancing figure makes it a bit more appealing. Cant' fit the Hampster into this,.. Hampster religioun? Or was it used by both to clean their....ahum you know, and thereby a holy animal?
Posted by: Dan at February 11, 2006 01:23 PM (Z2OsI)
3
You don't remember the dancing hampster phenom from a few years back?
Posted by: Rusty at February 11, 2006 02:14 PM (JQjhA)
4
The Muslim rave had me in tears. Ahhh, German techno, is there anyone who can resist dancing?
Posted by: Brass at February 11, 2006 04:52 PM (6TLEO)
5
Rusty,
No, I am from the Netherlands. Although we have a yearly returning supermarket commercial with animated Hampters, driving a 10 years old Mercedes on their way to the supermarket to buy every product they have in store, because in that week the prices are low. The call it the “Hampster weeks”. But I think that is something else.
Posted by: Dan at February 12, 2006 03:26 AM (Z2OsI)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 10, 2006
Caricatures Of The Prophet Mohammed
Just because I'm going through personal issues doesn't mean I haven't given up my quest for a fatwa.
Below the fold you will find several caricatures of the Prophet Mohammed.
WARNING: GRAPHIC IMAGES BELOW!!!!!
more...
Posted by: Vinnie at
01:40 AM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 64 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Dear god - all of them - have you no shame? That picture of Hilary! as
anyone (even Hilary!) is pathetic pandering for a fatwa. Shame!
Posted by: Jeff Medcalf at February 10, 2006 03:02 AM (eer2X)
2
Hell! I'm gonna kill ya just for tricking me into seeing that fat chick! I can only take so much disrespect.
Posted by: hondo at February 10, 2006 03:09 AM (3aakz)
3
You know, you coulda kept Scott Baio out of this. You've really crossed a line now, buddy.
Posted by: Oyster at February 10, 2006 03:57 AM (YudAC)
4
They're not Mohammed. I'M Mohammed!
Posted by: Aaron's cc: at February 10, 2006 04:19 AM (ov6Vw)
5
How come there are two pictures of Michael Moore in that group? Your chances of a fatwa would probably have gone up if you had included Larry Flynt.
Posted by: Graeme at February 10, 2006 04:23 AM (uncdj)
6
No Graeme, that was really three pictures of Hitlery. She looks quite different without her makeup.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 10, 2006 05:11 AM (0yYS2)
7
Vinnie, you may get that fatwa, yet. Anything that could get hondo that riled ought to be worth a fatwa.
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 10, 2006 05:12 AM (rUyw4)
8
How dare you foul the beauty of Scott Baio! I will light a flag on fire and not bathe for weeks and then maybe, refuse to tip my regular waitress at the olive garden.,
Posted by: Filthy at February 10, 2006 07:47 AM (5ceWd)
9
So Vinnie - when I come over this weekend - maybe we go for drive over to that Italian bakery n' pick up some cannolies.
Posted by: hondo at February 10, 2006 11:34 AM (3aakz)
10
i was looking for the actual caricutes of mohammed published in Denmark's Jyllands-Posten, but this was a good laugh. thanks
Posted by: melanie at February 11, 2006 12:12 PM (baeWk)
11
that fourth one down isn't me, it's Fatimomma, one of my 72 virgins. You have gone too far this time in desecrating her image. Now I'm really mad!
Posted by: Demmahom Phub at February 11, 2006 09:58 PM (tO9V8)
12
even the value ofJESUS christ who,and all God'sprophets,respect him so much and we will still respect him till the Dayafter.Really they are very hopless.
Posted by: salah at February 19, 2006 07:54 AM (mr/i9)
13
those who don't feel shame for insulting GOD'S PROPHET,surely they don't respect not only muslim's theirs prophet,but theirs too(MOSES NOR JESUS CHRIST).
Posted by: salah at February 19, 2006 08:01 AM (mr/i9)
Posted by: mike at February 24, 2006 01:45 PM (CcFK2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 09, 2006
Meanwhile, Somewhere in Dar al Islam....
Another Jawa Report editorial cartoon. Click for larger image and feel free to reproduce and distribute.
Related from the Islamic Republic: Rape Victim Receives Death Penalty. More here and here.
Related: French newspaper with another blasphemous cartoon and I guess we have to boycott Egypt since the cartoons were published there as well.
Posted by: Rusty at
09:42 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 65 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The Iranian cases bare close watching - seperate from all this bruha that has been happening over islam. It goes to the very heart of the internal domestic goings-on inside that country.
Iran is slowly inching towards a cliff (internally) which will forsee where Iran goes externally - internationally.
This is one of the reasons (clues) that I've not been overly interested in a confrontation with Iran at this time. Something is going to happen inside Iran that will dictate the future of that country - and it ain't the nukes I'm talking about.
Posted by: hondo at February 09, 2006 11:51 AM (3aakz)
2
Iran is a backwards country and why isnt the UN objecting to the exicution of a inocent girl the way they objected to the exiction of a convicted muderer like ROGER COLEMAN?
Posted by: sandpiper at February 10, 2006 09:39 AM (U+eLg)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 08, 2006
Fatwa Me, Baby
Fatwas should be issued c/o Rusty Shackleford.
Fatwa Me--we hereby:
Request, invite, and laugh at the issue of a FATWA, CURSE, SPELL, or any other fancied ignominy that any enemy of human liberty may choose to place upon us.
Posted by: Rusty at
01:19 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 44 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Do you receive something, like a certificate, when you got a Fatwa against you? Because it would look good on my wall, next to my 12, 410, and 30-06...
- Max
Posted by: Max at February 08, 2006 01:51 PM (+kFf8)
2
max,
Here ya go! Already sized for an 8X10 framable document. You'll have to find your own Imam to sign it.
Posted by: Oyster at February 08, 2006 03:36 PM (sMLtC)
3
Oyster,
Thanks for the certificate. I can't print it right now because I didn't receive any official Fatwa, but when that magical day will come, I'll use your template!
Mille merci!
- Max
Posted by: Max at February 09, 2006 08:46 AM (aPkwd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
It's The West's Fault That We're Terrified of Offending Muslims
I, for one, welcome our new Muslim overlords.
Posted by: Rusty at
11:21 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 28 words, total size 1 kb.
1
This is what we get for letting liberals take over, but that's all changing, though not quickly enough for my liking. If we get things turned around pretty soon, i.e. voting traitor scum out of office and turning of the money taps to the media whores, then we might be able to straighten out the situation without bloodshed. Liberalism and islam are like twin cancers that feed on the body of civilized humanity, and the sooner they're cut out, the less blood will be shed, but if we wait too long, it may require lots of bloodshed, and the patient may not survive anyway.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 08, 2006 11:32 AM (0yYS2)
2
CNN the Chicken News Network
Posted by: sandpiper at February 10, 2006 09:52 AM (U+eLg)
3
There is a show on CNN International called
'Inside the Middle East' ~ which tries to 'bridge the gap'.
I want to have a look over there -
but is there a travel insurance policy
which covers the loss of your head!
Posted by: Orange Tiger at February 10, 2006 11:24 PM (AlFBO)
4
I have got a better name for CNN
ANN or the Arab News Network!
Posted by: Orange Tiger at February 10, 2006 11:26 PM (AlFBO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 07, 2006
We Are Not All Danes Now
I've seen quite a bit of linking to Jeff Jacoby's latest column where he proclaims "we are all Danes now."
I'm not a Dane now. Never have been, never will be. No offense to our Danish friends, it's just a simple fact. I'm an American. Doesn't mean I don't support them, and their right to free speech. And I surely enjoyed the Carlsberg I bought, and will buy more (haven't tried the Fris yet, that's for the wife).
Besides, I was bashing Mohammed long before Jyllends-Posten ever dreamed of it.
So where's my damned fatwa already?
Posted by: Vinnie at
07:42 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 108 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You're an American?
I thought you were an Aussie for some reason.
Posted by: jonny at February 07, 2006 10:21 PM (nytWC)
2
Vinnie
Say it louder. Its gonna take more than a couple of cartoons in a few newpapers for me to give a damn.
Posted by: hondo at February 07, 2006 11:35 PM (3aakz)
3
When will be be Jews, or are the world's miner's canaries free game?
Posted by: Aaron's cc: at February 07, 2006 11:36 PM (ov6Vw)
4
I'm an Aussie, jonny, maybe you got us mixed up...
Posted by: Matthew at February 07, 2006 11:58 PM (/LA+Y)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 06, 2006
Jewish Extremists Protest Moses Cartoon Blasphemy
Via Caribpundit.
Posted by: Rusty at
08:41 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 14 words, total size 1 kb.
1
They are of the sect of jews that were kafiyehs instead of kippas.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 06, 2006 09:01 PM (8e/V4)
2
I loved the slogan...Islam is indeed a cancer. There may be a billion muslims but they can't fight or organise an army apart from cowardly terrorist attacks. There is no military might in the muslim world and little old Israel will continue kicking their sorry backsides. Mohammed passed on a crap fighting tradition to his useless warriors.
Posted by: Jester at February 06, 2006 09:29 PM (QKZX5)
3
Are you sure this isn't a Photoshop, I mean.. these people don't look very much like Jews, more Arab...funny!
Posted by: Dan at February 07, 2006 02:00 AM (Z2OsI)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Pimp My Fatwa
This is a post I did on my home blog back on May 10th of last year. If Mohammed being a child molestor isn't enough for some of you to see the rationale of our ridicule, and our right to portray images of him in an unflattering light, then maybe the notion of muta'a will. Mohammed is NOT a divine figure, he was a simple thug, a child molestor, and a pimp. If you can't handle the truth, that's your problem. Also, this is an old post, so some links may be expired. If you have a problem with that, I'll email you my home address and you can come burn down my embassy. Would you like to know something else? I could care less what 1 billion Muslims think. The truth hurts, don't it?
SC&A, ever concerned for my safety and well-being, may get me on the fatwa list even before Rusty and Jane. He sent me a link to a link to a USA Today article concerning the Muslim practice of "pleasure marriages."
BAGHDAD — In the days when it could land him in jail, Rahim Al-Zaidi would whisper details of his muta'a only to his closest confidants and the occasional cousin. Never his wife...
...The 1,400-year-old practice of muta'a— "ecstasy" in Arabic — is as old as Islam itself. It was permitted by the prophet Mohammed as a way to ensure a respectable means of income for widowed women...
Pleasure marriages were outlawed under Saddam Hussein but have begun to flourish again. The contracts, lasting anywhere from one hour to 10 years, generally stipulate that the man will pay the woman in exchange for sexual intimacy...
...A woman agreeing to a pleasure marriage that involves a one-time encounter might be able to count on about $100. For a muta'a that runs longer, she might be paid $200 a month, though the amounts vary widely and can depend on whether she has children.
So, in addition to being a child molester (I've read different accounts, one site said he married a 9 year old, another said six), Mohammed was a pimp. A benevolent pimp to be sure, after all, who doesn't feel sorry for lonely, broke widows. Of course, nowadays, the Koran is open to interpretation:
A turbaned Shiite cleric who issues wedding permits from a street-side counter in Sadr City says he encourages permanent marriages but gives the OK for pleasure marriages when there are "special reasons." The cleric, Sayid Kareem As-Sayid Abdullah Al-Mousawi, says he grants licenses for muta'a in cases where the woman is widowed or divorced, or for single women who have approval from their fathers.
That's right, you dads out there, convert to Islam and you too can be a pimp. Pimp-daddy, if you will. What the f**k, change your name to P. Diddy.
Is there an alternative? Well, yes. The treatment of Muslim women is well documented. They can avoid the whole "pleasure marriage" route, do what they want, be irresponsible, get naked and throw down with whoever they want.
And be the victim of an honor killing.
Prostitution or death. What a choice the Religion of Peace gives to its adherents.
Now I'll have to change the name. The Religion of Peace and Big Pimpin' Page. Has a nice ring to it, doesn't it?
Where's N.O.W. when you need them? Does Code Pink have an opinion on this issue?
(At this time, Blogger appears to be down, I'll link to the blog SC&A pointed me too when it's back)
I was going to end there, but I went back to the article and decided to post this:
Most Shiite scholars today consider it halal, or religiously legal. Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the highest religious authority in Shiite Islam, sets conditions and obligations for muta'a on his Web site. ("A woman with whom temporary marriage is contracted is not entitled to share the conjugal bed of her husband and does not inherit from him ..."
First off, I thought Sistani was the highest authority in Iraq, not all Shiite Islam. But, that's beside the point. This is the guy we're always reading about who is apparently eager to see a free, secular Iraq borne from the ashes of tyranny.
And he's just a pimp.
Posted by: Vinnie at
07:40 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 715 words, total size 5 kb.
1
Here's my dilemma.
a) I'm for the legalization of prostitution.
b) I believe prostitution is immoral.
So, this gets it 180 degrees backward! I want religious authorities to condemn prostitution and secular authorities to keep it legal. I don't want a state (like Iran) which legally outlaws prostitution but then comes up with essentially its equivalent, yet wrapped in the guise of relgion.
Posted by: Rusty at February 06, 2006 08:14 PM (JQjhA)
2
I believe that about 99% of what our government does is immoral and unconstitutional, but it mostly isn't illegal. Morality and legality rarely cross paths.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 06, 2006 08:49 PM (0yYS2)
3
IM:
And all this time i thought that our laws were based on Christian morality...i think i better reread my year 11 legal studies textbook
Posted by: Matthew at February 06, 2006 10:23 PM (/LA+Y)
4
Matthew, originally they were based on Christian morality. Today, they bear little resemblance to one another. The laws these days are based on "do whatever you want because not only are all men equal, so are their ideas".
Posted by: Oyster at February 07, 2006 07:45 AM (YudAC)
5
Rusty, federally mandated legal prostitution would lead to more irresponsibility, more laws and more cost to taxpayers who don't "indulge". It would be one thing to say, "Go ahead, but you're on your own." But that's not what would come of it.
Posted by: Oyster at February 07, 2006 07:57 AM (YudAC)
6
Our laws, i.e., the Constitution, were more directly based on Enlightenment ideals than Christian morality, which is specifically evinced by the fact that in the entire Constitution, there is no mention of God, Jesus, or anyone else, and religion is only mentioned in that it may neither be promoted nor suppressed by the government. Now, this does
not mean that Christian morals had no influence upon the men who wrote the Constitution, or the ideals of the Enlightenment, because I believe that a document like the Constitution, and its forebear, the Magna Carta, along with other important writings, such as those of Voltaire, Paine, and Locke, could have
only been written by Christians in a Christian nation at that time, or perhaps any time, but also only in a Christian nation that was heir to the Greek
and Roman, and to some extent Germanic and Celtic legal, moral, and philosophical traditions.
My evidence for all this is the fact that alone in the world, it was the citizens of the Enlightened nations who did more to propel the world forward to a new age of Liberty than anyone else; indeed, they alone are responsible, and though those who were the most influential were generally
not very religious, they could not have survived very long amongst any people other than Christians, because Buddhists could not have been motivated to fight for Liberty, and a muslim nation would have sent them to the headsman double quick. Such men as Voltaire, Franklin, Paine, Locke, Jefferson, et al, would not even have existed in any other place, because only in the West were people allowed to develop intellectually as they themselves saw fit. At least after the Catholic Church stopped burning them, but that's another argument.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 07, 2006 09:16 AM (0yYS2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Us vs. Them: the video
Dan Riehl has produced an excellent and moving video about why we fight and how the the reaction to the Muhammed cartoons relates to the greater war against radical Islam.
Go check it out here.
Posted by: Rusty at
02:26 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 45 words, total size 1 kb.
1
First time blogger. I just watched your video regarding islamic extremism-nice job. I could go on and on about how I feel regarding frustration w/Europe and anger at the "Sheehans" of the world.
I am actually looking to reenlist and join (as a 1st LT) an Army Reserve unit here in CT to be able to say that I am doing my part to counter these fools and threats to our way of life.
Anyway, I will keep checking in on your thoughts and others like Ralph Peters and M. Malkin. Thank you for the information.
Posted by: Andrew Peterson at February 07, 2006 02:54 PM (pNnP0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Muslims Protest Superbowl Results
Posted by: Rusty at
08:11 AM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 8 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Venom at February 06, 2006 08:39 AM (dbxVM)
Posted by: Debby at February 06, 2006 08:42 AM (j0UQe)
3
They're burning NFL logo flags ( hold my Starbucks while i light this sonsabitch) in SEEEEattle.
It's time for full time officials.
Posted by: Dave K at February 06, 2006 09:03 AM (YaR8u)
4
Venom,
What do you expect in 30 seconds!!
Posted by: Rusty at February 06, 2006 09:04 AM (JQjhA)
5
Waaa! Dropped passes hurt the Seahawks a lot more than any missed calls.
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at February 06, 2006 09:08 AM (WOQ34)
6
Where's Brad? I want his take on it since he is from Seattle. I say the Seahawks got robbed!
Hmm....looks like you used whiteout on that photoshop, Rusty. But I agree with the jihadist take on the referees. Heh!
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 06, 2006 09:10 AM (rUyw4)
7
Humiliated 49er fans seething and demanding tagliabue's head. What! oh yes they were! Taqiyaa applied, not only were they in it but they won by 50 points! I love Pislam(religion of winning my bets)
Posted by: Dadzilla at February 06, 2006 09:16 AM (oZUG3)
8
Beheading may be too severe, maybe just an eye or two.
Man, 3 calls and one player just killed us. The offensive PI, the holding call and calling Matt for a block below the waste when he actually made the tackle was just wrong.
OH and, Â….No virgins ever for Iron Hands Jeremy Stevens.
Posted by: Brad at February 06, 2006 09:19 AM (BJYNn)
9
You know what I like..like the first steeler touchdown that wasn't on the right side of the goal line..
always next year..
Posted by: akmarksman at February 06, 2006 09:24 AM (7U6zw)
10
30 seconds?! Perfection, of course! lol, no worries.
Posted by: Venom at February 06, 2006 09:45 AM (dbxVM)
11
not a fan of american football (its just rugby for poofs) but was laughing watching the fans of the winning team running round whooping and screaming like a bunch of demented muzzas.....
Posted by: ian uk at February 06, 2006 11:25 AM (GhCfc)
12
As a Seahawks fan, I hate to say it, but the Seahawks lost not only because the refs sucked, but so did the Seahawks (but only just barely worse than the Steelers).
What a crappy superbowl.
Posted by: Brian B at February 06, 2006 11:42 AM (rGfpg)
13
I don't know Brian B, as a Texan and someone who didn't have a dog in this fight, I thought Seattle outplayed Pittsburgh. A free touchdown for the Steelers, a bad call on what should have been a no call for a Seahawk touchdown, numerous bad holding calls just about every time Seattle made a big play, and what do you get? A sorry Super Bowl! I regret that the referees decided a game at this level.
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 06, 2006 11:51 AM (rUyw4)
14
I think Seattle probably still would have lost, but you gotta admit the officiating sucked!
Posted by: Rusty at February 06, 2006 12:14 PM (JQjhA)
15
This is karma, because the city and people of Seattle don't deserve a win.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 06, 2006 01:43 PM (0yYS2)
16
LOL!!! Must be a Seattle fan!
Posted by: Joe at February 06, 2006 07:20 PM (9kkfS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 05, 2006
Jack Straw: Appease in Our Time Cartoon (please circulate)
The Jawa Report's new editorial cartoonist, Sam, submits his latest masterpiece:
Jack Straw: Appease in Our Time. Please feel free to circulate it. Click for larger version.
Posted by: Rusty at
11:05 PM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
Post contains 45 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Does the name Neville Chamberlain ring a bell?
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 05, 2006 11:21 PM (rUyw4)
2
Rusty
I don't know the details of Straw's comments - I know Bush's and the US State Dept - and I know how some have twisted and deliberately mis-interpreted them.
This is getting a bit rediculous. Confrontation with islam - maybe - maybe not - whatever ...
But why so quicky turn inwardly on ourselves and friends?
Posted by: hondo at February 05, 2006 11:39 PM (3aakz)
3
The islamooslamists will get their wish: fearful Westerners will be cowed by their violence. But in the process they will gain the silent but burning emnity of tens of millions of these previously neutral (and even friendly) Westerners who will resent them for it. The more these Westerners see their own governments and media bending over to appease those barbarians, the more that enmity will burn in their souls. And in the long run, this will only work against the islamooslamists, and in favor of the West. Like 9/11, this is going to be a real wake up call.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 05, 2006 11:41 PM (8e/V4)
4
I'm not sure I really expect our authority figures to tell the Muslim World to "get over it," but it might be kind of refreshing. I guess there'd be an immediate wave of violence and the anti-war crowd would blame BushHitlerBurtonBlair for any property damage or loss of life. And one generally doesn't start a political career in order to put that sort of stamp on one's posterity. But the secondary effect might well be beneficial, if Islam begins to get the notion that we're a little bit crazy about our values.
And, I suppose one ought to have some respect for the religious convictions of others, even though it probably wouldn't be reciprocated. But... like... they're burning embassies... over a
carfreakin'toon! I mean, look in the mirron once in awhile, Islam! Zip your fly. Rotate your nose, so the rain doesn't pour in. Pull your pants up. It's a
carfreakin'toon!
We feel your (heh) pain...
Seriously, isn't this ping pong diplomacy in reverse?
Posted by: Demosophist at February 05, 2006 11:52 PM (SuxYQ)
5
Speaking of "peace in our time"...
-Guy calls for annihilation of Jews
-Oversees military buildup
-His country finished a war 20 years ago
-International community meets in Munich...
Lucky the Jews have a military this time
Posted by: Matthew at February 06, 2006 05:07 AM (w09XI)
6
Hondo,
As do I. However, in Britain they have hate crime legislation, so it makes such statements by Straw a little more odious than if, say, Condi had said the same thing.
Posted by: Rusty at February 06, 2006 08:03 AM (JQjhA)
7
Hey Rusty,
You have hate crime legislation in Britian? How come NO ONE was arrested for inciting murder during the demonstrations on Friday???
Posted by: Babs at February 06, 2006 08:31 AM (iZZlp)
8
Babs, because the British authorities don't have the balls to confront the radical Islamists.
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 06, 2006 10:30 AM (rUyw4)
9
the police have been studying the pictures of the protests over the weekend and have set up a special unit to deal with prosecuting anyone they deem to have broke the law.
one of the protesters has has made a speech of apology today after he attended the protest dressed as a suicide bomber....he didnt seem very genuine to me in his apology but there was a cleric standing over his shoulder as he said it.
jack straw by the way was very embarresed a few years ago after speaking out against drugs.....only for the british press to expose his son is a pot head.
Posted by: ian uk at February 06, 2006 10:37 AM (GhCfc)
10
your wrong jesusland, the british government are backing the police 100% in their enquiries. there will be arrest's believe me.
Posted by: ian uk at February 06, 2006 10:42 AM (GhCfc)
11
ian, if I am wrong, I will be glad. I sincerely hope these people are prosecuted to the full extent of the law and deported, but I noticed that many of the worst offenders had masks on or had their faces covered. How is one to identify them?
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 06, 2006 10:57 AM (rUyw4)
12
britain is a cctv state mate. thing is after shooting that innocent brazilian bloke in the head six times last summer our police/secret services are having to be a bit more carefull to identify the right targets.
Posted by: ian uk at February 06, 2006 11:06 AM (GhCfc)
13
Here are some good cartoons. WWW.ISLAMCOMICBOOK.COM
Posted by: bob at February 07, 2006 01:39 PM (8twVT)
14
I think it's fair to say i know a lot of people, as most of us do. I cant say I know anyone who doesn't feel strongly about the importance of, say, saving rain forests, in reducing harmful greenhouse gasses, that the war is "not in my name", etc. Sound beliefs for a greater good.
But whilst we all feel an inner conflict about these and other issues, not once have I, or to my knowledge anyone I know, attended a protest march about any of them. Cowardice? Perhaps. Maybe it would take just a few more reports replete with statistics to spur us into full blown action. We DO know something needs to be done and we DO hope that things will change. But for now at least, we'll sit back and see what happens next. My point is simply this. London prides itself on being multi-cultural, each corner of the world is represented here and this has many benifits. The many Muslim communities here and all over Britain are more prominent than any other minority, and those few extremists flaunting their anger at the recent protests are a greater minority still..Just as those anonymous faces at the 'save fossil fuel' marches seem a minority to me. They are only the tip of the ice-berg, and our government knows it.
Posted by: garf at February 07, 2006 07:44 PM (9rHDB)
15
Neville, (oops - sorry) Jack Straw has to appease the muslims. You have to be reasonable, he wants to get re-elected and his constituency has a massive muslim population. So, really, you cannot expect the poor man to do anything else, can you? Let's face it, would you give up his fantastic job, free housing, big car (and a driver, WHOPPING pension and all the cudos that goes with it: just to stand up for the indiginous population of Britain. He'd be stupid - wouldn't he??????
All he really has to do is go away on a freebe holiday somewhere where there is sun, sea and sand (and I'm not talking about iraq - Allah Forbid)somwhere nice in the West Indies, or the such. We will soon forget he chickened out. We always do!
Posted by: Thaxton1 at February 14, 2006 11:22 AM (N9IiB)
16
I wonder if it is the case the same drug dealing son of straw which is a muslim convert, in which case there is no surprise that Al Ayatollah Ibn Straw has come to give his beloved offspring a hand.
Posted by: Thaxton1 at February 18, 2006 01:29 AM (VFilb)
17
I wonder if it is the case the same drug dealing son of straw a muslim convert, in which case there is no surprise that Al Ayatollah Ibn Straw has come to give his beloved offspring a hand.
Posted by: kaffir at February 18, 2006 01:30 AM (VFilb)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
And Now A PBUHlic Service Announcement
Ladies and gentlemen, I am Mohammed Theprophet (PBUM), here to talk to you about a distressing situation in the world of fine art and high culture.
As you well know, I have had several supporting roles in such movies as "The Siege," "Executive Decision," and "The Delta Force" trilogy. I also had a prominent role in the television drama "Flight 93" and various episodes of "24." So I can talk about the arts from an insider's perspective. And what I see in the art world today distresses me greatly.
We are losing a valuable gem in the world of art. A beautiful flower amongst the dead petals of contemporary popular culture. This wonderful, yet disappearing art form is, of course
more...
Posted by: Vinnie at
11:03 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 276 words, total size 2 kb.
1
What's up with the compassionate head tilt?
Posted by: jesusland joe at February 05, 2006 11:23 PM (rUyw4)
2
I still can't believe they're burning embassies over care-freakin-toons. My Jordanian roommate once told me that the most popular TV show in Jordan was the Gong Show, but when people watched it no one laughed. They just sat around staring at the tube with a grim expression on their faces. It sounded impossibly strange at the time, but now I think I understand. It's like the painful experience of a young girl who shows up for the Prom in a hand-me-down dress with a big drek stain on the front. God, thinking Muslims must be totally mortified... like they've been shoved out the front door absent their pants. Even the America-hating Left is cracking up.
They're burning embassies over
cartoons. That's just off the foolishness scale, completely.
Posted by: Demosophist at February 06, 2006 12:12 AM (VR353)
3
Vinnie
Interesting isn't it - places like Denmark being in the vanguard of giving the West accessiblity and legitimacy of Pornography - and not just any porn. They were for a long time ground zero for kiddieporn - till forced deeper underground - they remain the king of beastial*** - now must complete with the Germans for the fringe SM and fetish crowds.
I could go on in other areas besides sex - say like drugs - whatever - but why bother. Denmark and much of Europe have deep societal "problems" just under the suface.
What the islamists have done is simply draw our attention to life in Europe - maybe its time we started to take a closer look at Europe in general before we re-crowd them as the heartland of Western civilization.
Posted by: hondo at February 06, 2006 12:19 AM (3aakz)
4
This board kicks out the strangest works as inappropriate like beast...! What's up with that?
Posted by: hondo at February 06, 2006 12:21 AM (3aakz)
5
Hondo:
Our societal "problems" are not under the surface. And openness on sexuality is not part of these problems, but part of the solution.
Every society has its child molesters. In one recent case in Denmark, a "father" prostituted his 10 year old daughter. Seven of the customers who are now charged - were turks! According to the newspapers these turks had no understanding that fucking a 10 year old girl could be in any way more wrong that fucking any other hole. So my guess is child molestation is far more widespread in muslim countries, it is just not perceived as such. My guess is that their fucked up views of sexuality are a great part of the reason for this.
And where was it now, that raped women are being punished for adultery? Oh, right.
-Lasse
Posted by: Lasse Hillerøe Petersen at February 06, 2006 08:15 AM (AkzEQ)
6
aw to think that the smiley faced little rag head grew up to be the cause of so much hate and death in this world-peace be upon him........................
Posted by: ian uk at February 06, 2006 10:56 AM (GhCfc)
7
Lasse
I haven't forgotten theat prior to all this there was (and is) a deep cultural divide between the US and Europe. Incredibly tame compared to thre current situation , eh?
These are your muslims - they didn't simply materialize out of nowhere overnight - you deal with them.
Posted by: hondo at February 06, 2006 03:23 PM (3aakz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 04, 2006
Frankly, We're Afraid of Offending You (Please Circulate)
A concerned citizen named Sam sent me this cartoon. Please circulate it or post it to your website. Yes, it's that good.
Click for bigger image:
He says:
Hi
Having witnessed the embarrassing behaviour of most the western media over the past couple of days in relation to the Danish cartoons, I was prompted to make this cartoon myself.
I'm not sure if you can make use of it, but perhaps you could circulate it
around or suggest another site/blog I could contact who might be interested.
Somebody get this guy a syndicated, please!
Posted by: Rusty at
12:14 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 110 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Send it to the Captain or Michelle.
Posted by: Oyster at February 04, 2006 12:38 PM (YudAC)
2
Rusty:
As I said below, about the only reason I can come up with for not publishing the cartoons is the chance that, by not doing so, one might provide a forum for Muslims to take a position in opposition to the the "Arab Street." In other words it makes some sense to offer hospitality and a microphone to Muslims willing to speculate that the concept behind those images of Muhammed
is a false and illegitimate idea, and that (assuming there's some concept of Muhammed that hasn't been seduced by Salafism) the images are therefor
not of The Prophet. That would be a fortuitous development. (Note that I don't have any stake in whether The Prophet was legitimate or not, but the proof will be in the behavior of believers rather than dogma.) And having listened to a number of British Muslims make precisely this point on the BBC I'm not quite ready to condemn them for not publishing the cartoons. There is some evidence, in other words, that the Muslim World isn't quite united behind the kabuki outrage.
That said, I think it's entirely ethical and moral to publish the cartoons even if one isn't necessarily in agreement with the sentiments they express... because the principle is worth supporting and because those who have published the images deserve the protection of numbers.
Anyway, is there a way I can fly the Danish flag on my blog, along with the Union Jack? I've kind of neglected that so far, and (just in case there are some Muslims willing to make the point above in my comments) I will refrain from posting the images for the time being. As you know, I'm not afraid. I carry a weapon, a practice which seem prudent and appropriate. I just think there may be a moral and ethical position for maintaining at least a small semblence of neutrality, for the sake of the Muslims willing to take a stand against totalitarianism.
Posted by: Demosophist at February 04, 2006 01:00 PM (A066M)
3
He is good.
Are the weekly comics in the lower 48 in color? Most of what I see in Alaska are black and white.
Posted by: Phillep at February 04, 2006 02:01 PM (un7CE)
4
Great cartoon. It needs to be sent to all news organizations that claim to support "freedom of speech”, and have, as yet, not published the “Mohammad Cartoons.”
Posted by: Bob Smith at February 04, 2006 03:37 PM (U2Qoq)
5
Screw Islam and all the cowardly accomplices here. I find Islams utter disrespect for human freedom and art to be so offensive that is should be re-classified from religion to psychopathic disorder
Posted by: Jake at February 04, 2006 09:39 PM (dByop)
6
We'll be Drawing Old Muhammad on the Wall
(music: She'll be coming 'round the mountain,
http://www.niehs.nih.gov/kids/lyrics/mountain.htm)
We'll be drawing old Muhammad on the wall,
We'll be drawing old Muhammad on the wall,
For even Muslims must admit it,
You don't need a special permit,
To be drawing old Muhammad on the wall.
We'll be spraying old Muhammad on the wall,
We'll be spraying old Muhammad on the wall,
With graffiti that's persisting,
We will show that we're insisting,
On our right to spray the Prophet on the wall.
We'll be painting old Muhammad on the wall,
We'll be painting old Muhammad on the wall,
Now some claim that He's angelic,
So we'll paint Him psychedelic,
We sure hope He likes His pictures on the wall.
We'll be etching old Muhammad on the wall,
We'll be etching old Muhammad on the wall,
The time has come to make our stand
Or our rights they will get banned,
And we'll find ourselves lined up against the wall.
(If you like this, please re-post it elsewhere on the Internet.)
Posted by: Ima Blogger at February 05, 2006 04:51 PM (qQE6X)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
111kb generated in CPU 0.0441, elapsed 0.1633 seconds.
136 queries taking 0.1332 seconds, 408 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.