May 04, 2006
Mexico Backs Away from Drug Legalization
In a turnaround from what was
previously reported, Mexican President Vicente Fox has balked on the drug legalization law.
From WashingtonPost.com:
Mexican President Vicente Fox backed off signing a drug decriminalization bill that the United States warned could result in "drug tourism" and increased availability of narcotics in American border communities.
Fox reversed course Wednesday and said he was sending the bill back to Congress for changes, just one day after his office had said he would sign it into law. The measure would have dropped criminal penalties for possession of small amounts of marijuana, cocaine, heroin and other drugs.
Fox's statement said he will ask for corrections "to make it absolutely clear in our country, the possession of drugs and their consumption are, and will continue to be, a criminal offense."
Really?
I'm confused. Fox wants the law which drops criminal penalties for possession to clearly state that drug possession is a criminal offense.
It doesn't make sense to me. Of course, I'm a guy who thinks "law-abiding illegal alien" is a contradiction.
From Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
04:52 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 186 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Well at least thats a good move now why dont they take back their illegal laeins as well
Posted by: sandpiper at May 04, 2006 07:33 AM (760E/)
2
Sobering when the hit finally wears off ...
Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 04, 2006 09:30 AM (FCC6c)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 02, 2006
Euthanasia Delayed For Now
On April 25, I wrote about a woman who was about to be euthanized by a Houston hospital's ethics committee, over the objections of the woman herself and her family. Good news, at least temporarily.
From the Washington Times:
A Texas hospital has agreed to delay taking a severely ill woman off life support, following a failed plan to transfer her to an Illinois nursing home.
St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital had invoked the state's futile-care law, which allows hospitals to take some patients off life support with 10 days notice to the families, the Houston Chronicle reported.
Cross-posted at
The Dread Pundit Bluto and
Vince Aut Morire.
Posted by: Bluto at
01:49 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 113 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I do not know if she can exist without the machine, but if my taxes are paying for it, I say pull the plug after 10 day notice.
Sorry, that is how I feel at the moment.
Posted by: Leatherneck at May 02, 2006 08:07 PM (D2g/j)
2
Andrea Clark is recovering and the procedings have been stopped - all after she changed doctors who adjusted her medication. Her white blood cell count has been down to normal for five days now, and she has been able to get off of the blood pressure raising drugs that she has had to be on for months.
St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital in Houston and it's so-called "Ethics Committee" (sic) had wanted to withdraw life support from Andrea Clark instead of giving her body the opportunity to recover.
Were it not for a physician that truly cared, respected Andrea's own wishes, AND had the common decency to care about life, unlike St. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital and it's "Ethics Committee" - Andrea Clark would likely be dead instead of having an opportunity to continue fighting for her life and recover, which she is apparently still doing as of last night.
Posted by: Richard at May 03, 2006 05:43 AM (ENIEZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
18kb generated in CPU 0.0212, elapsed 0.1093 seconds.
118 queries taking 0.098 seconds, 232 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.